Introduction

Interface engineering is a crucial strategy in enhancing the overall performance of perovskite solar cells (pero-SCs), by improving film morphology1, charge carrier dynamics2,3, and reducing interface charge recombination4,5. Particularly, in inverted pero-SCs (or p-i-n pero-SCs), hole transport layer (HTL) at the bottom buried interface plays a critical role in the device performance. Among these HTLs, the self-assembled monolayer (SAM) has recently drawn great attention due to its simple structure, facile fabrication process and superior charge extraction efficiency6,7,8,9. A typical SAM molecule consists of a p-type conjugated (such as a carbazole unit) terminal group, an alkyl spacer and an anchoring group10. The terminal group usually determines the energy level and surface wettability of the HTL, while the anchoring group shows significant influence on the resulting SAM coverage on substrate11,12,13,14,15. Anchoring groups with −PO(OH)2 exhibit higher substrate coverage compared to the alternatives like −COOH and −SO3H, and are widely used in the molecular design of SAMs16,17,18,19. During the thermal annealing process, these SAM molecules bond to the metal oxide (MO) and form an organized monolayer. Among various metal oxides (MO), nickel oxide (NiOx), a well-known p-type metal oxide, has been widely used as the substrate of the SAM HTL for its exceptional hole transport ability, chemical and thermal stability20. With the application of the magnetron sputtering technology, the fabrication becomes suitable and widely utilized for large-scale production in industry21.

NiOx exhibits strong chemical bonding with SAM22. Meanwhile, the deposition of SAM effectively passivates the defects on the NiOx surface and optimizes the HTL/perovskite interface. Consequently, the combined HTL of NiOx/SAM provides important opportunities for the improvement of the performance of p-i-n pero-SCs. You et al. modified NiOx with hydrogen peroxide and created a more hydroxyl content surface, promoting the SAM anchoring on it22. Zhu et al. reported a SAM MeO-4PADBC in the NiOx/SAM HTL with lowered voltage deficit in the pero-SCs23. Sargent et al. applied the NiOx/SAM HTL into wide-bandgap pero-SCs in all perovskite tandem solar cell and achieved high performance24. However, variations in the valence states of NiOx on the surface create complexity in the growth of a high-quality SAM HTL. Meanwhile, the oxidation reaction caused by high-valent nickel species (Ni3+) in NiOx can accelerate the decomposition of amine halides, detrimentally affecting both device performance and long-term stability25,26,27.

To simultaneously enhance the quality of the SAM and reduce the intrinsic reactivity of the NiOx surface, comparing with the strategies mentioned above, we aimed to develop a dual-functional interfacial strategy. Given the strong oxidative nature of high-valence nickel species in NiOx, we sought to exploit this property to promote the formation of a more homogeneous SAM layer. Specifically, we envisioned introducing a reducing agent that could react with NiOx to passivate its surface while concurrently functioning as an HTL and facilitating the formation of a high-quality SAM layer.

Herein, we designed and synthesized a new SAM molecule 4-(3-fluoro-6-methoxy-9H-carbazol-9-yl)butane-1-thiol (MeOF-4SHCz), which is applied together with (4-(3-fluoro-6-methoxy-9H-carbazol-9-yl)butyl)phosphonic acid (MeOF-4PACz) as a combined HTL28. Due to the reducibility of thiol groups, MeOF-4SHCz can serve as an effective reducing agent to reduce the Ni3+-rich regions on the surface of the NiOx substrate. The oxidation product of 4-(3-fluoro-6-methoxy-9H-carbazol-9-yl)butane-1-sulfonic acid (MeOF-4SACz) could form a new S-O-Ni bond at the Ni3+ region, together with the P-O-Ni bond at the Ni2+ region, improving the overall quality and coverage of SAM on the NiOx substrate. Moreover, the redox reaction causes the reduction of Ni3+ on the NiOx surface and hence lowers the reactivity between the NiOx and perovskite interface, which is beneficial to improving the photovoltaic performance of pero-SCs. As a result, the device based on the redox-improved (ROI)-SAM reaches a higher PCE of 26.5% (certified as 26.28%), and a better stability of T90 > 1000 h at the maximum power point (MPP) under continuous 1 sun illumination.

Results

Mechanisms for ROI-SAM

The molecular structure of MeOF-4SHCz is presented in Fig. 1a, and the synthesis procedures of MeOF-4SHCz are described in the Methods section. The molecular structures were further confirmed by nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectroscopy as shown in Supplementary Figs. 1-7. To investigate the interaction between the MeOF-4SHCz and the NiOx substrate, X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) measurements were performed. We analyzed the XPS spectra to examine the valence states of the elements, and the detailed XPS peak fitting data are listed in Supplementary Tables 1-7. The MeOF-4SHCz SAM was deposited onto the NiOx substrate, before annealing, two distinct peaks were observed in S 2p spectrum at binding energies of 163.2 eV and 164.3 eV, corresponding to the S2− species from thiol groups29. Notably, after annealing at 100 °C for 10 minutes, a new peak appeared in S 2p spectrum at binding energy of 167.5 eV (see Fig. 1b, Supplementary Tables 1 and 2), which is also reported in the previous study on the adsorption of alkyl mercaptan on the NiOx surface30. To determine the oxidation product, we conducted electrospray ionization Fourier-transform ion cyclotron resonance mass spectrometry (ESI-FTICR-MS) based on the mixture of NiOx nanoparticles and MeOF-4SHCz. The substance with mass-to-charge (m/z) of 350.1 was detected, suggesting the formation of MeOF-4SACz molecules with −SO3H groups (Supplementary Fig. 8). Therefore, we deduce that the −SH group in MeOF-4SHCz is oxidized by Ni3+ into −SO3H group, as illustrated by the following chemical equation:

$$3{{{{\rm{Ni}}}}}_{2}{{{{\rm{O}}}}}_{3}+2{{{\rm{R}}}}-{{{\rm{SH}}}}{\to }^{\triangle }6{{{\rm{NiO}}}}+2{{{\rm{R}}}}-{{{\rm{S}}}}{{{{\rm{O}}}}}_{3}{{{\rm{H}}}}$$
(1)
Fig. 1: Redox reaction at the NiOx-perovskite interface.
Fig. 1: Redox reaction at the NiOx-perovskite interface.
Full size image

a Chemical structure of MeOF-4SHCz. b S 2p XPS spectra and fitted peaks of the NiOx/MeOF-4SHCz samples before and after thermal annealing. The fitted components include S2- 2p3/2 (green), S2- 2p1/2 (brown), and SO32- (blue). c S 2p XPS spectra and fitted peaks of NiOx/MeOF-4SHCz (thermal annealed) and MeOF-4SACz. The fitted components include S2- 2p3/2 (green), S2- 2p1/2 (brown), and SO32- (blue). d Schematic illustration of the oxidation process. e Reaction energy of MeOF-4PACz and MeOF-4SHCz with NiO and Ni2O3, respectively. f Ni 2p XPS spectra and fitted peaks of NiOx after treatment with MeOF-4PACz and MeOF-4SHCz. The fitted components include NiO (yellow), Ni(OH)2/Ni2O3 (brown), NiOOH (green) and Ni≥3+ species (dark green). g Schematic illustration of the reduction process. h XRD spectra of perovskite coated on NiOx, NiOx/Pristine-SAM and NiOx/ROI-SAM. The inset presents the ratio of the intensity of the PbI2 peak and the FAPbI3 (100) peak. i P 2p XPS spectra and fitted peaks of the NiOx/MeOF-4PACz (top) and NiOx/MeOF-4SHCz samples, respectively. The fitted components include P 2p3/2 (green) and P 2p1/2 (brown). Source data are provided as a Source Data file.

where R represents the 3-fluoro-6-methoxy-9H-carbazol (MeOF-Cz). Based on the above redox reaction, we further synthesized the MeOF-4SACz and measured its XPS spectrum. It exhibits a binding energy of 167.7 eV (Fig. 1c), closely matching the new peak appeared in S 2p spectrum mentioned above. Moreover, for the MeOF-4SHCz treated NiOx film, the existence of −SO3H groups can also be observed by photo-induced force microscopy (PiFM) (Supplementary Fig. 9). This oxidation process is shown in Fig. 1d. The −SO3H group generated from oxidation can serve as an additional anchoring group on the NiOx surface.

As MeOF-4SHCz is co-applied with MeOF-4PACz on the NiOx substrate, it is important to investigate the binding preference of each SAM on different Ni species (Ni2+, Ni3+). Therefore, we calculated the reaction energy between SAM and NiOx surface (Fig. 1d, e)31,32,33,34. The results show that there is a tridentate bind mode at NiO surface because of the thermodynamically favorable configuration with the lowest total energy, while a bidentate mode at Ni2O3 surface due to the larger lattice spacing, and this larger lattice spacing limits the interaction between the anchor group and the substrate (Supplementary Fig. 10, Supplementary Tables 3-4). For the MeOF-4PACz, the reaction energy with NiO is −0.80 eV, and that with Ni2O3 is −1.00 eV, indicating no significant preference between the two Ni species. For the MeOF-4SHCz, the reaction energy with NiO is −0.09 eV, which suggests it hardly interacts with Ni2+. However, on Ni2O3, MeOF-4SHCz preferentially undergoes oxidation with a reaction energy of −5.25 eV, which is significantly lower than that of MeOF-4PACz with Ni2O3, indicating a much stronger driving force for the reaction of MeOF-4SHCz with Ni2O3 during the self-assembly process. As a result, the MeOF-4SHCz strengthens the binding of the SAM to the Ni3+-rich regions, and improves the quality of the SAM layer on NiOx substrate.

As the thiol group in MeOF-4SHCz is oxidized to higher valence states, the valence state of the oxidant NiOx also changes. The peak fitting and analysis of Ni in the XPS spectra were performed25,27,35,36. The content of NiO species was calculated to evaluate the Ni2+ content, and the total content of higher valence species was considered as Ni3+ content. The binding energy of different Ni species is listed in Supplementary Table 5. For bare NiOx, as shown in Supplementary Fig. 11 and Supplementary Table 6, the integration results of the peak fitting show that the content of Ni3+ is 78.2%. When MeOF-4SHCz is deposited on NiOx, as shown in Fig. 1f and Supplementary Table 6, the Ni3+ content decreases to 75.3%. This change suggests that the Ni3+ species on the surface is reduced to a lower oxidation state. However, when the regular MeOF-4PACz is deposited on NiOx, the content of Ni3+ remained 78.1% and shows almost no change, which means the −PO(OH)2 group barely influences the valence state of the NiOx surface. The results also indicate that the −SH groups are more inclined to react with Ni3+ than −PO(OH)2 groups, which makes MeOF-4SHCz an effective SAM to target the Ni3+-rich region on the NiOx substrate, potentially contributing to a more homogeneous SAM layer. Considering that the reaction mainly occurs at the surface, to further investigate the oxidation of Ni3+ species, Ni2O3 powder was mixed with the MeOF-4SHCz powder and XPS measurements were performed. The results show about 47% of MeOF-4SHCz oxidized to MeOF-4SACz, which confirms the surface oxidative role of the Ni3+ (Supplementary Fig. 12). And this process can be illustrated as Fig. 1g.

Measurements of kinetic process of the SAMs were conducted to characterize the oxidation influence of HTL on the perovskite layer. For simplicity, the MeOF-4PACz SAM is named as “Pristine-SAM”. The X-ray diffraction (XRD) analysis reveals that the perovskite layers coated on the ROI-SAM substrates exhibit a slight decrease in the intensity ratio of the PbI2 peak to the FAPbI3 (100) (Fig. 1h). And the tendency is shown in the inset, with the ratio of 0.128 for bare NiOx, 0.103 for the Pristine-SAM, and 0.091 for the ROI-SAM, respectively (Supplementary Table 7). As the three samples have the same perovskite composition, the reduced PbI2 formation corresponds to a lower loss of ammonium salts, which indicates the less oxidation of I. We performed additional analyses to directly investigate the interfacial degradation (Supplementary Fig. 13). Specifically, we deposited FAI onto the NiOx layer and the NiOx/MeOF-4SHCz layer, and found the formation of the neutral FA molecule in NiOx/FAI sample. To figure out the chemical transformation, we immersed the sample into anhydrous toluene and performed UV measurement. The UV-vis absorption spectrum shows a peak at ~500 nm, characteristic of molecular iodine, confirming the oxidation of I- during the process. The reaction can be summarized as

$$2{{{\rm{FAI}}}}{\to }^{{{{{\rm{NiO}}}}}_{x}}2{{{\rm{FA}}}}+{{{{\rm{I}}}}}_{2}$$
(2)

However, the NiOx/MeOF-4SHCz sample shows no FA molecule generated. As a result, the deposition of MeOF-4SHCz on NiOx could reduce the reactivity between NiOx and perovskite active layer, thereby suppressing the oxidation of perovskite components and potentially enhancing the long-term stability of the corresponding pero-SCs.

As shown in Fig. 1i and Supplementary Table 8, the addition of MeOF-4SHCz did not affect the binding energy of phosphorus, indicating the −SH group did not cause obvious change to the bonding between −PO(OH)2 and NiOx layer in the rest Ni2+-rich regions. Eventually, MeOF-4SHCz can serve as an effective reducing agent and effectively reduce the Ni3+-rich regions on the NiOx substrate, which may contribute to a more uniform SAM layer.

Distribution of SAM in devices

Kelvin probe force microscopy (KPFM) was employed to examine the potential distribution of SAM on the NiOx layer. As illustrated in Fig. 2a and b, the sample with ROI-SAM displays a more uniform potential distribution with a smaller standard deviation than that of the sample with the Pristine-SAM, with 22.6 mV for Pristine-SAM and 14.5 mV for ROI-SAM, which suggests that the ROI-SAM exhibits a more uniform SAM layer37. Additionally, the conductive atomic force microscopy (c-AFM) demonstrates that the ROI-SAM sample (root mean square roughness (RMS) equals 0.134 nA) has a more uniform distribution than the Pristine-SAM sample (RMS = 0.197 nA) as shown in Fig. 2c, d. The results indicate that MeOF-4SHCz additive effectively improves the SAM uniformity on the NiOx substrate, which is favorable for the charge transfer in the corresponding pero-SCs. Meanwhile, the contact potential difference (CPD) of the ROI-SAM HTL is 274.2 mV, slightly lower than that (339.2 mV) of the Pristine-SAM sample (Fig. 2a, b), indicating that the ROI-SAM HTL has a deeper Fermi level with improved electron-blocking capability. Additionally, we performed conductivity measurements on both ROI-SAM and Pristine-SAM samples (Supplementary Fig. 14). The conductance showed a negligible change from 0.451 S to 0.439 S, indicating that the surface reaction had little impact on the bulk conductivity. Ultraviolet photoelectron spectroscopy (UPS) measurements were conducted to further confirm the energy level of the HTLs (Supplementary Fig. 15), with the data shown in Supplementary Table 9. The work function calculated from UPS curves of ROI-SAM sample is 5.38 eV, slightly higher than the Pristine-SAM sample of 5.31 eV, which is consistent with the CPD data.

Fig. 2: Distribution of SAM on NiOx.
Fig. 2: Distribution of SAM on NiOx.
Full size image

KPFM surface potential maps and corresponding potential histograms of the Pristine-SAM (a) and ROI-SAM (b) on NiOx substrates. Scale bar: 1 μm. The mean surface potential is 339.2 mV for Pristine-SAM and 274.2 mV for ROI-SAM. The corresponding standard deviations are 22.6 mV and 14.5 mV, respectively. c-AFM current maps and corresponding current histograms of Pristine-SAM (c) and ROI-SAM (d) on NiOx substrates. The average current is 0.181 nA for Pristine-SAM and 0.177 nA for ROI-SAM. The RMS values of two samples are 0.197 and 0.134, respectively. Top views of equilibrated molecular representation of Pristine-SAM (e) and ROI-SAM (f). g TOF-SIMS depth profiles of selected ions and 3D imaging of SO3- (green dot) of the perovskite deposited on the NiOx/ROI-SAM substrate. The sputter time and the true vertical depth of the perovskite layer are not scaled. The film was fabricated based on an ITO substrate. Source data are provided as a Source Data file.

To understand the self-assembly process of the Pristine-SAM and ROI-SAM systems, we performed molecular dynamics simulations to reveal the interaction between MeOF-4PACz and MeOF-4SHCz on the NiOx substrate during self-assembly38. The detailed kinetic processes are presented in Supplementary Figs. 16 and 17. From 20 ps to 100 ps, phosphate groups tend to form clusters due to hydrogen-bond interactions, leading to aggregation in the solution. After introducing MeOF-4SHCz with thiol groups, the dispersion of phosphate groups improves, and the number of clusters decreases at equilibrium, this improvement in solution dispersion facilitates uniform adsorption on the substrate. With the incorporation of MeOF-4SHCz, the SAM precursor solution also exhibits improved homogeneity, as shown in Fig. 2e and f, which is beneficial to the homogeneity of the formation of the SAM. When annealing, MeOF-4SHCz undergoes oxidation to form –SO3H groups, which anchor onto the NiOx substrate and function as part of the HTL, improving the overall quality of the SAM layer.

Time-of-flight secondary ion mass spectrometry (TOF-SIMS) was performed to study the spatial distribution of the SAM in the device (Fig. 2g). The perovskite precursor was dissolved in DMF/NMP = 6:4 (v/v) to diminish trace DMSO in perovskite film, and the sulfur content is entirely attributed to the −SO3H group in the SAM. When conducting the TOF-SIMS measurement, the −SO3H group is detected as SO3. It was concentrated at the same depth as PO3 (see Supplementary Fig.18) and remains resistant to washing and the annealing of the perovskite precursor solution, which suggests the bonding of the −SO3H on the NiOx substrate. Moreover, the SO3 lateral distribution driven by the redox reaction is found to be uniform, which also confirms the overall coverage of the SAM on the NiOx.

Optoelectronic properties of the SAM layer and Perovskite films

To investigate the charge recombination properties and charge-carrier dynamics at the buried perovskite interface, we measured steady-state photoluminescence (PL) spectra (Fig. 3a) and time-resolved photoluminescence (TRPL) (Fig. 3b, Supplementary Fig. 19 and Supplementary Table 10). The perovskite film coated on the ROI-SAM (ROI-SAM sample) exhibits higher PL intensity compared to that on the Pristine-SAM HTL (Pristine-SAM sample), indicating the reduced non-radiative charge recombination. The TRPL spectrum of NiOx/ROI-SAM displays a longer decay time (73.1 ns) compared to that (37.0 ns) of the Pristine-SAM sample, which suggests reduced non-radiative charge recombination loss at the interface39,40. Space charge limited current (SCLC) technique was employed to characterize the defect density41 (Fig. 3c). The trap-filled-limit voltage (VTFL) extracted from the ROI-SAM sample is 0.29 V and smaller than that (0.33 V) of the Pristine-SAM sample, which means a lower trap density. This reduction is likely due to the higher quality of the buried SAM layer, which facilitates better crystallization and growth of the perovskite film, thereby reducing interfacial defects, consistent with the observations from the decay time of TRPL spectrum.

Fig. 3: Characteristics of SAM layers and the corresponding perovskite films.
Fig. 3: Characteristics of SAM layers and the corresponding perovskite films.
Full size image

PL and TRPL spectra of perovskite films deposited on NiOx/Pristine-SAM (a) and NiOx/ROI-SAM (b) substrates, respectively. The excitation light was incident from the ITO side. c Dark Current density-voltage curves using the SCLC model for hole-only devices: ITO/NiOx/SAM/Perovskite/Spiro-OMeTAD/Ag, with Pristine-SAM or ROI-SAM. The hole mobility in the ROI-SAM based device is 2.95×10−3 cm2·V−1·s−1 while the Pristine-SAM device is 1.17×10−3 cm2·V−1·s−1. d Nanosecond transient absorption spectra of Pristine-SAM. 2D Nanosecond transient absorption spectra of Pristine-SAM (e) and ROI-SAM (f), respectively. g Kinetic traces probing at 540 nm for the ESA of carriers in Pristine-SAM and ROI-SAM based perovskite films. The pump light was incident from the ITO side. PL mapping of perovskite film coated on Pristine-SAM (h) and ROI-SAM (i) HTL, respectively. scale bar, 10 μm. Source data are provided as a Source Data file.

The nanosecond transient absorption (TA) spectra measurements were also conducted to investigate the exciton dissociation and recombination dynamics of different HTLs (Fig. 3d, Supplementary Fig. 20). A pump wavelength of 488 nm was used to selectively excite the film. As shown in the 2D spectra in Fig. 3e, f, both samples exhibit similar transient absorption features. Between 520 nm and 720 nm, a broad excited state absorption (ESA) peak centered at 540 nm was observed. We then compared the transient kinetics at the wavelength of 540 nm42,43, as shown in Fig. 3g. The ROI-SAM-based film exhibited a rapid decay before 0.1 μs, likely due to the more effective charge extraction, which decreases the number of charge carriers in the perovskite film. After 1 μs, this curve decays more slowly than that of the Pristine-SAM sample.

Moreover, PL mapping of the ROI-SAM HTL exhibits a more uniform PL emission (Fig. 3h, i), which is likely contributing to the improved buried interface. We further investigated the morphology of the perovskite layer using scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and atomic force microscopy (AFM). Compared to the film coated on Pristine-SAM, the ROI-SAM-based film exhibits larger grains (Supplementary Fig. 21), and reduced RMS (Supplementary Fig. 22). These results also confirm that, after using ROI-SAM as HTL, the perovskite layer exhibits a more uniform morphology, which is beneficial to the interfacial contact and improves the device performance.

Photovoltaic performance of the p-i-n pero-SCs

We fabricated devices and studied the photovoltaic performance of pero-SCs utilizing the Pristine-SAM or ROI-SAM as HTLs. The device structure of the pero-SCs studied in this work is shown in the cross-sectional SEM image in Fig. 4a, with the architecture of ITO/NiOx/SAM/perovskite/C60/BCP/Ag [ITO, indium tin oxide; BCP, 2,9-Dimethyl-4,7-diphenyl-1,10-phenanthroline]. The concentration of MeOF-4SHCz in the ROI-SAM solution was optimized to be 0.25 mg·mL−1, and the concentration of MeOF-4PACz is 1 mg·mL−1 (weight ratio of MeOF-4SHCz/MeOF-4PACz is 1:4). The effect of the MeOF-4SHCz concentration on photovoltaic performance parameters of the pero-SCs is presented and compared in Supplementary Fig. 23. It is shown that the PCE of the pero-SCs based on the ROI-SAM increases with the MeOF-4SHCz concentration rising from 0 to 0.25 mg·mL−1. However, as the MeOF-4SHCz concentration is further increased to 0.5 mg·mL−1, the device performance declines, which is likely due to the hindered bonding between MeOF-4PACz and NiOx by excessive MeOF-4SHCz.

Fig. 4: Photovoltaic performance of perovskite solar cells.
Fig. 4: Photovoltaic performance of perovskite solar cells.
Full size image

a Cross-sectional SEM image of the ROI-SAM based pero-SC. b J − V characteristics curves of the pero-SCs using Pristine-SAM or ROI-SAM as HTLs under forward and reverse scans (device area: 0.09 cm2), under the illumination of AM1.5 G, 100 mW cm−2. c Steady-state PCEs of the pero-SCs using Pristine-SAM or ROI-SAM as HTLs. d EQE curves of the pero-SCs using Pristine-SAM or ROI-SAM as HTLs. e Distribution of the PCEs of the pero-SCs using Pristine-SAM or ROI-SAM as HTLs. f Transient photocurrent plots of the devices with NiOx/Pristine-SAM or NiOx/ROI-SAM HTL. g MPP tracking of the encapsulated pero-SCs using Pristine-SAM or ROI-SAM as HTLs (LED lamp, 100 mW cm−2, 25°C, 30% RH). Source data are provided as a Source Data file.

The current density (J)–voltage (V) characteristic curves of pero-SCs under forward and reverse scans are illustrated in Fig. 4b. The optimized ROI-SAM based devices show an improved Jsc of 26.6 mA·cm−2, Voc of 1.18 V and FF of 84.5% in comparison with the Pristine-SAM based devices showing the slightly lower Jsc of 26.4 mA cm−2, Voc of 1.15 V and FF of 83.2%, leading to an enhanced PCE from 25.3% for the Pristine-SAM based devices to 26.5% for the ROI-SAM based devices (Supplementary Table 11, certified PCE of 26.28%, Supplementary Fig. 24). The steady-state PCEs of the pero-SCs using Pristine-SAM or ROI-SAM as HTLs were 25.5% and 25.9%, respectively, as shown in Fig. 4c. In addition, the Jsc value from the external quantum efficiency (EQE) measurements was integrated to be 24.7 mA·cm−2 for the Pristine-SAM based devices and 25.0 mA·cm−2 for the ROI-SAM based devices, as shown in Fig. 4d. The statistical device parameters are illustrated in Fig. 4e, which indicates that the ROI-SAM based devices show good reproducibility, likely due to the improved uniformity of the buried SAM layer.

The charge transfer dynamics in the pero-SCs were investigated by transient photocurrent (TPC) measurement44 (Fig. 4f). The photocurrent delay time of the device based on ROI-SAM is 0.8 μs and smaller than that (1.5 μs) of the Pristine-SAM, suggesting more effective charge carrier extraction. In Supplementary Fig. 25, the exponential factor (α) of ROI-SAM device obtained from the slope of the logarithmic Jsc and logarithmic light intensity is closer to 1, suggesting better charge transport and reduced recombination of ROI-SAM HTL.

Besides the increased efficiency, we evaluated the long-term operational stability of the encapsulated device by tracking the maximum power point (MPP) under 1 sun illumination at 25 °C and 30% relative humidity (Fig. 4g). The ROI-SAM based devices retained 90% of their initial efficiency (T90) after about 1000 hours. In contrast, the Pristine-SAM based control devices maintained 81% of their initial PCE under the same conditions, while the unmodified NiOx-based devices exhibited the T80 around 600 hours, which shows the enhanced stability of the ROI-SAM-based devices. We then conducted thermal tests at 85 °C under N2 atmosphere. The ROI-SAM devices showed improved thermal tolerance (T90 > 576 h) compared to the control (T90 ~ 72 h) and Pristine-SAM (T90 ~ 312 h) devices (Supplementary Fig. 26). The improved long-term efficiency is attributed to the improved SAM layer and better interfacial contact with the perovskite active layer, and the decomposition of perovskite caused by the oxidation of Ni3+ can be mitigated. These results indicate that the ROI-SAM HTL with weight ratio of MeOF-4SHCz/MeOF-4PACz = 1:4 is an effective strategy for enhancing the operational stability of p-i-n pero-SCs.

Discussion

In conclusion, we present a ROI-SAM strategy utilizing the difference in the reaction driving forces between −SH group and −PO(OH)2 group to target the Ni3+-rich and Ni2+-rich regions on the NiOx substrate, respectively. The −SH-functionalized SAM molecule MeOF-4SHCz can be oxidized and effectively form bonds with the high-valence region of NiOx during annealing, and the valence states of NiOx becomes more homogeneous due to the redox reaction. This strategy provides a facile approach to enhance the overall quality and uniformity of SAM/NiOx HTL in the inverted pero-SCs.

Methods

Materials

Cesium iodide (CsI, 99.9%), dimethyl formamide (DMF, anhydrous) and dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO, anhydrous) were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich. Formamidinium iodide (FAI, 99.5%), methylammonium iodide (MAI, 99.5%), lead iodide (PbI2, 99.9%), lead chloride (PbCl2, 99.9%), 1,3-Propyldiammonium diiodide (PDADI) and C60 were purchased from Xi’an Yuri Solar Co. All materials were used as received without further purification. ITO substrates were purchased from Suzhou Shangyang Solar Technology Co.

Synthesis of MeOF-4PACz

MeOF-4PACz was obtained in our laboratory as published previously.

Synthesis of MeOF-4SHCz

Supplementary Fig. 1 shows the synthetic route of MeOF-4SHCz, and it was synthesized by the following steps. MeOF-4C-Br (500 mg, 1.432 mmol) and thiourea (163.6 mg, 2.149 mmol) were dissolved in EtOH (20 mL) in a two-neck round-bottom flask. The mixture was refluxed at 80 °C for 20 h under argon protection. Subsequently, an aqueous solution of KOH (4.9 g in 7 mL H₂O) was added into the flask and the resulting mixture was refluxed for another 9 h. After cooling to room temperature, HCl was added to adjust the pH of the solution to 4. The mixture was then extracted with dichloromethane (50 mL×3) and the organic phase was purified by column chromatography on silica gel using dichloromethane/petroleum ether (1/3, v/v) as the eluent. As a result, a white powder of MeOF-4SHCz (212 mg, 49% yield) was obtained. 1H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 7.98 (dd, J = 9.4, 2.6 Hz, 1H), 7.75 (d, J = 2.5 Hz, 1H), 7.60 – 7.48 (m, 2H), 7.27 (td, J = 9.1, 2.6 Hz, 1H), 7.12 (dd, J = 9.0, 2.6 Hz, 1H), 4.36 (t, J = 7.0 Hz, 2H), 3.85 (s, 3H), 2.52-2.42 (m, 2H), 2.21 (t, J = 7.8 Hz, 1H), 1.82 (p, J = 7.1 Hz, 2H), 1.53 (p, J = 7.3 Hz, 2H). 13C NMR (101 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 157.77, 155.47, 153.51, 137.44, 136.32, 122.78, 122.68, 122.48, 122.44, 116.08, 113.74, 113.49, 110.81, 110.73, 110.64, 106.52, 106.28, 103.99, 56.17, 56.10, 42.46, 40.63, 40.42, 40.21, 40.00, 39.79, 39.58, 39.37, 31.28, 27.85, 27.76, 26.57, 23.95. ESI-FTICR-MS, Calcd for C17H18FNOS (M-H)-: 302.10149 Found: 302.10237.

Synthesis of MeOF-4SACz

Supplementary Fig. 2 shows the synthetic route of MeOF-4SACz, and it was synthesized by the following steps. Sodium hydride (71 mg, 3.04 mmol) was carefully added to a solution of MeOF core (500 mg, 2.33 mmol) in 30 mL of anhydrous THF at 0 °C. After stirring for 1 h, 1,4-butanesultone (414 mg, 3.04 mmol) was added and the reaction mixture was refluxed for 24 h. The resulting solid was recovered by filtration and washed with acetone repeatedly to afford product as a slightly yellow powder (0.66 g, 81% yield). 1H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 7.96 (dd, J = 9.4, 2.6 Hz, 1H), 7.74 (d, J = 2.5 Hz, 1H), 7.62-7.50 (m, 2H), 7.25 (td, J = 9.2, 2.6 Hz, 1H), 7.11 (dd, J = 8.9, 2.6 Hz, 1H), 4.34 (t, J = 7.1 Hz, 2H), 3.85 (s, 3H), 2.48 – 2.40 (m, 2H), 1.80 (p, J = 7.3 Hz, 2H), 1.65-1.53 (m, 2H). 13C NMR (101 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 157.73, 155.42, 153.46, 137.46, 136.36, 122.71, 122.62, 122.42, 122.38, 116.06, 113.70, 113.46, 110.88, 110.80, 110.71, 106.44, 106.20, 103.98, 56.19, 56.11, 51.55, 42.90, 40.61, 40.41, 40.29, 40.20, 39.99, 39.78, 39.57, 39.36, 28.43, 23.19. ESI-FTICR-MS, Calcd for C17H17FNO4S(M-H)-: 351.09406 Found: 350.08696.

Device fabrication

The patterned ITO glass substrates were sonicated with detergent, deionized water, acetone and isopropanol for 30 min sequentially. After the ultraviolet ozone treatment for 30 min, NiOx (15 mg·mL−1) were spin-coated on the substrate at 3,000 rpm for 30 s and annealed at 150 °C for 15 minutes in the ambient air. Then the controlled condition (1 mg·mL−1 MeOF-4PACz) and target condition (1 mg·mL−1 MeOF-4PACz and 0.25 mg·mL−1 MeOF-4SHCz) solutions were spin-coated on NiOx at 3,000 rpm for 30 s and then annealed in inert gas at 100 °C for 10 min respectively. Cs0.05FA0.9MA0.05PbI3 was prepared according to the stoichiometric ratio with solvent of DMSO: DMF (v/v  =  1/5) as the perovskite precursor, with excessive 5% PbCl2 and MAI addition. The 1.8 M perovskite precursor solution was spin-coated at 5,000 rpm for 30 s with an acceleration of 5,000 rpm s−1 and at the 15 s, 800 μL diethyl ether poured onto the substrate. The perovskite films were annealed at 100 °C for 30 min in the N2 atmosphere. 0.5 mg mL−1 PDADI was spin-coated at 5,000 rpm for 30 s and then annealed at 100°C for 10 min. Finally, C60 (30 nm)/BCP (8 nm)/Ag (100 nm) were deposited by thermal evaporation under a pressure of 2×10-6 torr. The devices were controlled by a mask with an area of 0.09 cm2 during the J-V measurement.

Characterization of SAM and perovskite films

The 1H and 13C nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy was recorded on Bruker AVANCE 400 MHz spectrometer at 300 K. Chemical shifts (δ) are reported relative to tetramethylsilane (TMS) as an internal standard. High-resolution mass spectra were recorded on a Bruker solariX Fourier-transform ion cyclotron resonance mass spectrometer (FTICR-MS) equipped with an electrospray ionization (ESI) source operating in negative-ion mode. Fourier-transform Infrared (FTIR) Spectroscopy was recorded on Bruker VERTEX 70 v, and UV-Vis absorption spectra were obtained on PerkinElmer Lambda 1050 + .

X-ray Photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) data and Ultraviolet photoelectron spectroscopy (UPS) were measured by Kratos AXIS ULTRA DLD spectrometer. Non monochromatic He I (21.22 eV) source was used as an excitation source. Gold was used as reference. The bias voltage applied during the test is -9 V. X-ray diffraction (XRD) was measured with PANalytical Empyrean X-ray diffractometer with Cu Kα radiation at the scan rate of 2° min−1.

Photo-induced force microscopy (PiFM) results were acquired using a Vista Scope microscope from Molecular Vista, inc., from Songshan Lake Materials Laboratory. All PiFM experiments were excited by a pulsed quantum cascade laser (Block Engineering) with a gap-free narrow band tunable wave number of 760-1950 cm−1. The spectral linewidth is ~2 cm−1 with a wave number resolution of 0.5 cm−1. The PiFM experiment here was operated at the sideband excitation with the laser-frequency modulated at fm = f1-f0, where f0 is the first mechanical eigen mode resonances of the cantilever that is used for PiF signal detection, while f1 denotes the second ones recorded for the AFM topography of the sample. The probe is a Pt-coated tip with a resonant frequency of ~350 kHz (PPP-NCHPt-MB, Nanosensors). The atomic force microscopy, Kelvin probe force microscopy (KPFM) and conductive atomic force microscopy (c-AFM) images were obtained by Bruker ICON2-SYS.

TOF-SIMS analysis was performed on a TOF-SIMS-M6 spectrometer (ION-TOF GmbH, Münster, Germany) equipped with a 30 keV Bi3+ primary ion gun pulsed at 10 kHz (mass range: 0 – 563 Da). An argon gas cluster ion source (GCIB, 10 kV, 5 nA) was employed as sputter gun. Negative ion spectra were calibrated by O-, OH-, C2-, C2H-, and Cl-, etc. An electron flood gun for charge neutralization was applied throughout the experiments. The scan sputter area was 400 × 400 μm2 and the analysis area was 200 × 200 μm2. Data were processed by ION-TOF SurfaceLab software (Version 7.4, ION-TOF GmbH) by signal of corresponding ions or fragment ions. To better resolve the SAM signal in TOF-SIMS, perovskite films with reduced thickness were prepared by diluting the perovskite precursor solution. To visualize the SAM layer more clearly, the perovskite precursor solution was diluted to form a thinner perovskite film.

Steady-state photoluminescence (PL) spectra were carried out with Horiba Jobin Yvon system. The excitation wavelength was set to 490 nm, and the final spectra were obtained by averaging three scans. The films tested in time-resolved photoluminescence (TRPL) were excited by a 485 nm pulse laser with a repetition frequency of 500 kHz provided by a picosecond pulsed diode laser (FLS980, Edinburgh Instruments Ltd). PL mapping experiments were undertaken by using a confocal laser scanning microscopy (CLSM, Leica STELLARIS 8, Germany) with a 40x object lens. Perovskite films were excited with a Diode laser (488 nm), and the photoluminescence were collected from 600-700 nm.

Nanosecond transient absorption spectrometer was composed of a regenerative-amplified Ti: sapphire laser system (Coherent) and EOS pump-probe system (Ultrafast Systems). The regenerative-amplified Ti: sapphire laser system (Legend Elite-1K-HE, center wavelength of 800 nm, pulse duration of 25 fs, pulse energy of 4 mJ, repetition rate of 1 kHz) was seeded with a mode-locked Ti: sapphire laser system (Vitara) and pumped with a Nd: YLF laser (Evolution 30). The output 800 nm fundamental of the amplifier was split into two beam pulses. The main part of the fundamental beam went through the optical parametric amplifiers (TOPAS-C), whose output light was set as the pump light with wavelength of 488 nm and chopped by a mechanical chopper operating at frequency of 500 Hz. Probe light was generated from an EOS (Ultrafast Systems) apparatus, produced in a diode-laser-pumped photonic crystal fiber, and electronically delayed relative to the pump pulse with a digital delay generator. Data acquisition was performed using the EOS software package from Ultrafast Systems. The pump was spatially and temporally overlapped with the probe beam on the sample.

Surface and cross-sectional morphology of the films and devices were examined by scanning electron microscopy (SEM, Hitachi S-4800). For the cross-sectional image, the sample was coated with ca. 1 nm-thick gold using sputter to enhance the conductivity.

Characterization of devices

The light intensity was calibrated to be 100 mW·cm−2 by an SRC-2020 reference cell (traceable to NREL). The current density-voltage (J–V) curves of the perovskite solar cells were measured using a Keysight B2901A Source-Meter, with the scanning voltage from 1.22 V to -0.2 V in 20 mV step and delay time of 1 ms. The device area is confined to 0.09 cm2 by a mask. The measurements were performed in a glove box filled with nitrogen (oxygen and water contents are smaller than 10 ppm). Enli-tech class AAA Solar Simulator (model, SS-X180R-3A) with a 450 W xenon lamp was used as the light source. The EQE responses were measured by Solar Cell Spectral Response Measurement System QE-R3-011 (Enli Technology Co., Ltd., Taiwan). The light intensity at each wavelength was calibrated with a standard single-crystal Si photovoltaic cell. For the stability tests, all the devices were encapsulated, and measurement was performed under a LED that was adjusted to AM 1.5 G (100 mW·cm−2) in ambient atmosphere.

Molecular simulations

Density functional theory (DFT) calculations were performed using the Vienna Ab initio Simulation Package (VASP). The projector augmented-wave (PAW) method was employed, and the Perdew–Burke–Ernzerhof (PBE) functional within the generalized gradient approximation (GGA) was used to describe the exchange-correlation interactions. A Vacuum layer of 30 Å was used in the Z-direction to separate the slabs. The plane-wave cutoff energy was set to 600 eV. Structural relaxation was carried out using the conjugate gradient algorithm with an energy convergence criterion of 1×10-4 eV and a force convergence threshold of 0.05 eV/Å. The Brillouin zone was sampled using a Γ-centered 1×1×1 k-point mesh due to the large size of the supercell. Subsequently, total energies were calculated on the optimized geometries using a denser Γ-centered 3 × 3 × 1 mesh. VESTA was used for visualization.

The Molecular Dynamics simulation was performed using the Materials Studio (MS) 2020 software package (BIOVIA, USA). A model containing NiO, molecule MeOF-4PACz and molecule MeOF-4SHCz were built through Amorphous Cell (AC) modules with Condensed-phase Optimized Molecular Potentials for Atomistic Simulation Studies II (COMPASSII) the force field. The Forcite module was used to optimize the molecular structure, during the geometric optimization process, the convergence threshold for maximum energy change, maximum force convergence threshold, and maximum displacement convergence threshold are 0.001 kcal/mol, 0.5 kcal/mol/Å, and 0.015 Å, respectively. To obtain a more optimized structure, a 100 ps dynamic simulation was conducted under the NVT ensemble with a step size of 1 fs. In the progress of MD, Electrostatic is calculated using Ewald, while van der Waals is calculated using atom based. The precise Nose-Hoover temperature control mode and Berendsen pressure control mode are used in the dynamic process.

Reporting summary

Further information on research design is available in the Nature Portfolio Reporting Summary linked to this article.