Abstract
Microglial capacity to adapt to tissue needs is a hallmark feature of these cells. New studies show that mitochondria critically regulate the phenotypic adaptability of macrophages. To determine whether these organelles play similar roles in shaping microglial phenotypes, we generated transgenic mouse crosses to accurately visualize and manipulate microglial mitochondria. We find that brain-region differences in microglial attributes and responses to aging are accompanied by regional differences in mitochondrial mass and aging-associated mitochondrial remodeling. Microglial mitochondria are also altered within hours of LPS injections and microglial expression of inflammation-, trophic-, and phagocytosis-relevant genes is strongly correlated with expression of mitochondria-relevant genes. Finally, direct genetic manipulation of microglial mitochondria alters microglial morphology and leads to brain-region specific effects on microglial gene expression. Overall, this study advances our understanding of microglial mitochondria and supports the idea that mitochondria influence basal microglial phenotypes and phenotypic remodeling that takes place over hours to months.
Similar content being viewed by others
Introduction
An essential and defining characteristic of microglia is their ability to rapidly remodel their attributes and shift into a wide array of distinct functional states1,2,3. Historically, microglial cellular phenotypes were viewed in a binary fashion as either pro-inflammatory (M1, activated) or anti-inflammatory / tissue-reparative (M2, homeostatic)4. Work over the past 10-15 years has refined our understanding of microglial functions, showing that they can adopt a wide spectrum of transcriptional signatures, morphologies, and secretory/ proliferative/ phagocytic/ migratory profiles5. Moreover, the particular combination of microglial properties observed depends on brain region, age, and the presence or absence of chronic stress, high fat diet, and pollution exposure. Distinct tissue injury, infection, and disease processes also elicit unique sets of properties in responsive microglia5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17, meaning that binary categorization of microglial functional states is far too simplistic and inaccurate.
As the field works to catalogue the spectrum of cellular phenotypes that microglia display in distinct circumstances, efforts have also been made to identify central or master regulators of microglial phenotypes. Key examples include transcription factors that turn on entire programs of microglial gene expression and associated downstream functional capabilities. Other examples include chromatin remodelers that can similarly enable or suppress expression of large numbers of genes that will shape downstream microglial attributes and functions10,18. Identifying such regulators of microglial phenotypes that have the capacity to modulate numerous microglial attributes is of high utility for the field. It can assist with defining and categorizing microglial functional states, as they can be determined on the basis of the central regulator rather than panels of 10s-100s of microglial genes, proteins, or functional readouts. These central regulators are also of great interest as potential therapeutic targets that could be utilized to elicit broad changes in microglial function via coordinated regulation of multiple microglial attributes. Recent findings raise the possibility that mitochondria - as organelles - may have the capability to regulate microglial phenotypes in this fashion.
Classically thought of as the ATP producing powerhouse of the cell, mitochondria are now also recognized as critical signaling hubs19,20,21,22. Mitochondria can influence calcium-dependent intracellular signaling pathways via their ability to buffer intracellular calcium. They exert strong influence on signaling that involves protein post-translational modifications, as mitochondrial metabolic pathways generate many of the metabolites needed for these modifications. Mitochondria can influence the function of cellular endoplasmic reticulum and lysosomes via physical interactions with these organelles, and mitochondria can signal to the nucleus to impact gene expression19,20,21,22. Research in macrophages supports the idea that mitochondria act as signaling hubs, demonstrating that mitochondria regulate macrophage responses to pathology and ability to shift into distinct inflammatory states23,24,25,26,27,28,29. Key observations suggest a similarly important role for these organelles in regulating changes in microglial cellular phenotypes. Regional differences in microglial phenotypes are accompanied by prominent differences in expression of mitochondrial-relevant genes30, and the state of mitochondria appears to be linked to microglial responses to early life immune challenge, brain injury, and protein aggregates in neurodegenerative disease31,32,33,34,35,36,37,38. Yet, direct and rigorous study of these organelles in microglia in vivo is minimal and gaps persist in our knowledge about potential mitochondrial regulation of microglial attributes.
To begin addressing this knowledge gap, we sought to analyze the relationship between mitochondria and key microglial attributes in both physiological and pathological contexts in mice. We used multiple transgenic crosses and multidisciplinary approaches to determine whether differences in microglial properties across brain regions during normative aging were accompanied by regional differences in microglial mitochondria. To explore the relationship between these organelles and microglial properties during CNS challenges, we chose pathological insults that differ in their modality (tissue injury vs inflammatory challenge) and time course over which microglia exhibit phenotypic remodeling (mins vs hours/days). Finally, to probe causal links between mitochondrial state and microglial properties we generated transgenic crosses to selectively manipulate microglial mitochondria and link organelle state to cellular properties. Collectively, these studies advance the field by revealing the mitochondrial landscape within microglia and the relationship of these organelles to microglial phenotypic remodeling across brain regions, in response to inflammatory insult, and during aging.
Results
Region-specific phenotypes of microglia are accompanied by regional differences in mitochondrial mass and number
Mitochondrial abundance, morphology, and molecular composition vary dramatically across cell types39, suggesting that the relationship between mitochondria and cellular function cannot be generalized across cell types and needs to be defined on a cell by cell basis. To unequivocally visualize microglial mitochondria, we crossed mice that express inducible cre recombinase in microglia (CX3CR1CreER/+) with mice that express Cre-dependent mitochondrial-targeted GFP (mitoGFP) (Fig. 1A)40,41. In fixed tissue from young adult (2mo) double transgenic CX3CR1CreER/+;mitoGFP mice (MG-mitoGFP mice hereafter), numerous GFP+ structures could be observed throughout the somas and cell processes of microglia in the nucleus accumbens (NAc) and ventral tegmental area (VTA), two interconnected brain regions where we have extensively mapped microglial phenotypes across the lifespan (Fig. 1B and Fig. S1A, B)30,42,43. Consistent with reports of tamoxifen-independent recombination when using CX3CR1CreER/+ mice and reporters with minimal distance between loxP sites44,45, recombination was observed in approximately 80% of microglia in MG-mitoGFP mice without tamoxifen administration (Fig. S1A–C) or in oil-injected controls (Fig. S1D, E). FACS-based analysis indicated that 4-hydroxytamoxifen treatment increased recombination to approximately 90% of microglia (Fig. S1F, G). Given the high level of tamoxifen-independent recombination, we elected to carry out analyses without tamoxifen-treatment, unless otherwise noted. In terms of cellular and organelle specificity of mitoGFP, FACS analyses indicated that GFP expression was not observed in non-microglial CNS cells (Fig. S1H, I). Moreover, in acute brain sections from MG-mitoGFP mice, GFP+ structures were consistently colocalized with tetramethylrhodamine (TMRM), a mitochondrial membrane potential indicator, confirming that GFP-tagged structures are mitochondria (Fig. S1J, K). Together these results indicate that MG-mitoGFP mice accurately label microglial mitochondria.
A Schematic of transgenic crosses used to achieve GFP labeling of microglial mitochondria. B Representative high-magnification images from P60 MG-mitoGFP mice of NAc microglia (Iba1) and mitochondria (GFP); panels at right show 3D volumetric reconstructions of microglia (transparent gray) and mitochondria (colored according to volume). C–E Field of view (FOV) microglial volume (tissue coverage; *P = 0.003), FOV microglial mitochondrial mass (FOV mitochondrial volume / FOV microglial volume; *P = 0.001), and FOV microglial mitochondrial number (relative to FOV microglial volume; *P = 0.026) in NAc and VTA. Data points from the same mouse connected by lines (N = 7 mice, stats via two-tailed paired t-tests). F Representative confocal images of microglial cells in NAc and VTA expressing cytosolic TdTomato (TdTom) and mitochondrial targeted GFP (MG-mitoGFP;Ai14 mice). Reconstruction of cell branching and 3D volumetric reconstruction of mitochondria in Imaris at right. G Total process length of individual microglia from PFC (N = 15 cells), NAc (N = 16 cells), and VTA (N = 15 cells). One-way ANOVA with Bonferroni correction, F2,43 = 31.30, P = 0.0001. *P < 0.05. H Robust regression plots relating mitochondrial number and volume to total process length of individual microglia from PFC (R = 0.40 P = 0.17), NAc (R = 0.13 P = 0.42), and VTA (R = 0.56 P = 0.02). *P < 0.05 I Sum of branch points of individual microglia from PFC, NAc, and VTA. One-way ANOVA with Bonferroni correction, F2,43 = 36.73, *P = 0.0001. *P < 0.05. J Robust regression plots relating mitochondrial number and volume to morphological complexity (sum of branch points) of individual microglia from PFC (R = 0.17 P = 0.59), NAc (R = 0.45 P = 0.08), VTA (R = 0.49 P = 0.08). *P < 0.05. Mice used for these experiments were not treated with 4-hydroxytamoxifen. Data for panels C, D, E, G, and I was plotted as mean +/- SEM. Source data for all graphs are provided as a Source Data file.
Microglia show prominent differences in cell density, branching complexity, and gene expression across the NAc and VTA30. To determine if these regional differences in baseline microglial attributes were accompanied by regional differences in microglial mitochondria, we carried out high resolution confocal imaging and 3D volumetric reconstruction of both microglia and their mitochondria in the NAc and VTA of young adult mice (Fig. 1B and Fig. S2A). Consistent with previous findings, microglial tissue coverage in the VTA was lower than that observed in NAc (Fig. 1C)30. Yet, field of view (FOV) mitochondrial mass (mitochondrial volume relative to microglial volume) and FOV mitochondrial number relative to microglial volume were greater in the VTA compared to the NAc (Fig. 1D, E). The FOV sphericity, median volume, max volume, and aspect ratio (longest axis/shortest axis - measure of elongation) of individual mitochondria were relatively consistent across NAc and VTA (Fig. S2B–E). Together, these observations indicate that regional differences in microglial cellular phenotypes are accompanied by regional differences in some but not all mitochondrial metrics.
Mitochondrial number is partially correlated with morphological complexity of microglia
Microglial capacity to survey the surrounding brain tissue is influenced by the degree of their cell branching complexity. To define how mitochondrial networks relate to microglial branching structure, we crossed MG-mitoGFP mice to Ai14 reporter mice to drive cytosolic expression of TdTomato (TdTom) along with GFP tagging of microglial mitochondria (Fig. 1A)40,41,46. In the absence of tamoxifen injection, incidence of mitoGFP+TdTom+ cells was low enough to allow rigorous and unequivocal reconstruction of the branching patterns of individual microglial cells and their mitochondrial networks in VTA and NAc as well as prefrontal cortex (PFC) (Fig. 1F and Fig. S2F). Consistent with previous findings, microglia display morphological differences across these brain regions, with NAc microglia exhibiting greater total process length than VTA microglia (Fig. 1G)30. PFC microglia displayed total process length comparable to that of VTA microglia. To relate these regional differences in total process length to mitochondria of the cells, we used regression analyses and found that greater process length was significantly associated with higher total volume of mitochondria in NAc microglia (Fig. 1H). Both VTA and PFC microglia showed trends toward greater process length being correlated with a greater number of mitochondria (Fig. 1H). These findings suggest that a greater quantity/volume of mitochondria are needed to support a greater mass of cell processes.
Microglia also displayed regional differences in morphology in terms of total number of branch points, with this metric being elevated in NAc microglia compared to VTA and PFC microglia (Fig. 1I). Robust regression analyses revealed that greater branching was associated with a greater number of mitochondria for VTA microglia (Fig. 1J). Trends toward greater branching being associated with a larger total volume of mitochondria were also evident for NAc and VTA microglia. Intriguingly, these findings suggest that the architecture of cell processes, rather than simply the total amount of cell processes, may be related to mitochondrial networks within microglia (Fig. 1J). Consistent with this idea, Sholl analysis revealed that both the number of intersections (reflecting the number of cell process branches / morphological complexity) and the number of mitochondria reached a maximum at approximately 20–25 µm from the cell soma in the PFC, NAc, and VTA microglia (Fig. S2G–I). Hence, the subcellular distribution of the organelles aligns with branching architecture, as opposed to mitochondria being primarily clustered in the soma or at the motile tips of microglial processes. In addition, the maximum number of Sholl intersections was significantly correlated with the total number of mitochondria in PFC, with NAc and VTA microglia showing trends toward significance in this metric (Fig. S2J). Altogether, these analyses suggest that baseline microglial morphology and features of their mitochondria are partially interlinked.
Mitochondrial number and mitochondrial motility are not aligned with microglial tissue surveillance
Microglia engage in continual morphological remodeling as they survey the surrounding tissue. Microglial tissue surveillance can also vary across brain regions and is assumed to be an energy-intensive process7,47. However, the relationship between microglial cell process motility and mitochondrial abundance has not been explored. We performed two-photon imaging in acute brain sections prepared from young adult (2-3mo) MG-mitoGFP;Ai14 mice and recorded motility of NAc and VTA microglial cell processes (TdTom) and attributes of mitochondria (GFP) within these cells (Fig. 2A, B and Fig. S3A–C). Microglia were imaged at least 60 µm below the surface of the brain section. Although microglia show more simplified branching in acute brain sections compared to fixed tissue, total mitochondrial volume and total number of microglial Sholl intersections were positively correlated (Fig. S3D), indicating that alignment of mitochondria with the morphological architecture of the cells was preserved in acute brain sections. Moreover, microglial motility and mitochondrial motility were not correlated with time elapsed since preparation of brain sections (Fig. S3E, F), suggesting that this preparation is well suited for initial exploration of relationships between mitochondria and microglial cell dynamics.
A Representative images taken during multiphoton live imaging of VTA microglia (TdTomato) and their mitochondria (GFP) in acute brain sections from 1.5–2mo old MG-mitoGFP;Ai14 mice. B Example of microglial cell process extension indicated by white arrow. C Overall microglial motility in NAc and VTA during a 10-min period. N = 14 NAc cells and N = 12 VTA cells, P = 0.659, two-tailed t-test. Data was plotted as mean +/- SEM. D Robust regression analysis relating mitochondrial volume (total volume in a cell averaged across time points) and microglial motility over a 10-min period. N = 14 NAc cells, R = −0.42 P = 0.14 and N = 12 VTA cells, R = −0.19 P = 0.57. E Robust regression analysis relating mitochondrial mass and microglial motility over a 10-min period. N = 14 NAc cells, R = −0.10 P = 0.49 and N = 12 VTA cells, R = 0.04 P = 0.98. F Representative examples of mitochondrial fission and fusion observed in microglia from MG-mitoGFP mice. G Raw fluorescence from multiphoton imaging (left) and 3D reconstruction of microglial mitochondria (right), colored by time. H Displacement of individual mitochondria across cells over a 10-min period. N = 116 NAc mitochondria and N = 134 VTA mitochondria. Box plot displaying median, 25-75 percentiles (box), and 5th and 95th percentiles (whiskers). I Robust regression analysis relating mitochondrial motility to microglial motility. N = 14 NAc cells, R = −0.07 P = 0.78 and N = 12 VTA cells, R = −0.06 P = 0.70. J Robust regression analysis relating mitochondrial motility within one primary microglial branch to motility of the primary branch itself. N = 55 primary branching processes from NAc microglia, R = 0.06 P = 0.91 and N = 46 primary branching processes from VTA microglia, R = 0.01 P = 0.75. Mice used for these experiments were not treated with 4-hydroxytamoxifen. Source data for all graphs are provided as a Source Data file.
Although NAc and VTA microglia displayed regional differences in morphology and mitochondrial mass in fixed tissue (Fig. 1), microglial cell process motility, defined as percent pixel change over a 10 min period, was similar across NAc and VTA in acute brain sections (Fig. 2B, C and Fig. S3B). In addition, despite several associations between microglial morphology and features of their mitochondria in fixed tissue (Fig. 1H, J and Fig. S2J), there was no correlation between total mitochondrial volume or mitochondrial mass and microglial motility in NAc or VTA (Fig. 2D, E) in acute brain sections. These observations suggest that there is a more robust relationship between mitochondrial abundance and baseline cell morphology than with dynamic remodeling of that morphology.
Microglial mitochondria themselves also exhibited motility that included jitter, concerted directional movement, and occasional examples of fission and fusion (Fig. 2F, G and Fig. S3C). These types of mitochondrial motility are consistent with what has been reported in other cell types29,48. 3D reconstruction and tracking of mitochondria in Imaris revealed that motility of individual mitochondria (total displacement over 10 mins) was similar in NAc and VTA microglia, with the majority of mitochondria displaying modest movement (approximately 1 µm) and a smaller number of mitochondria showing larger movements of 2-6 µm (Fig. 2H). To begin exploring whether mitochondrial motility was related to cell process remodeling of individual microglia, we used robust regression analyses and found that mitochondrial motility (percent pixel change for all mitochondria in the cell) was not significantly correlated with microglial motility in either the NAc or the VTA (Fig. 2I). This was also the case at the level of primary branches of microglia. Even within one microglial cell, some primary branches contained few or no mitochondria while others contained multiple mitochondria. However, there was no significant correlation between motility of primary microglial branches and either mitochondrial motility (Fig. 2J) or mitochondrial mass within those branches (Fig. S3G). Altogether, these data further reinforce the idea that mitochondria are not tightly linked to baseline microglial tissue surveillance within a 10 min time frame.
Mitochondrial distribution is stable during early phases of microglial response to focal injury
In addition to homeostatic tissue surveillance, microglia exhibit rapid and robust cell process extension toward focal sites of CNS injury49,50,51. In acute brain sections from MG-mitoGFP;Ai14 mice, we induced focal laser lesions and imaged the response of both microglia and their mitochondria to this insult. Consistent with previous findings in the field49,52, microglia rapidly extended cell processes toward and contacted the lesion within 5 min (Fig. 3A–G). However, these rapidly extending cell processes did not contain any mitochondria and no mitochondria were trafficked into lesion-responsive cell processes during the imaging period (Fig. 3A–E). Quantitative analyses confirmed minimal change in mitochondrial (GFP + ) signals within 30 µm of the lesion over a 20 min period (Fig. 3H, I). Qualitative observations suggested minimal remodeling of mitochondria in the somas and non-extending processes of microglia that responded to laser lesion (Fig. 3A–E, zoom).
A Representative image from multiphoton live imaging of NAc microglia (TdTomato) and their mitochondria (mitoGFP) in an acute brain slice from young adult MG-mitoGFP;Ai14 mouse prior to induction of focal laser injury. B TdTom+ microglia and GFP+ mitochondria from the same field of view as in A immediately following induction of focal laser lesion (T0). Ring 1 encompasses the primary lesion area, with inner and outer rings at 15 μm and 30 μm from ring 1, respectively. C–E TdTom+ microglia and GFP+ mitochondria from the same field of view as in A at 5, 10, and 20 min post laser lesions. F, G Percent change in TdTomato signal (microglial processes) within the outer and inner rings, respectively, relative to T0. One-way ANOVA with repeated measures: Outer ring within subjects comparison F(3,24) = 1.6, P = 0.215, Outer ring between subjects comparison F(1,8) = 0.01, P = 0.942, Inner ring within subjects comparison F(3,24) = 2.38, P = 0.095, Inner ring between subjects comparison F(1,8) = 4.08, P = 0.078. H, I Percent change in GFP signal (mitochondria) within the outer and inner rings, respectively, relative to T0. One-way ANOVA with repeated measures: Outer ring within subjects comparison F(3,24) = 1.2, P = 0.318, Outer ring between subjects comparison F(1,8) = 3.69, P = 0.091, Inner ring within subjects comparison F(3,24) = 5.4, P = 0.005, Inner ring between subjects comparison F(1,8) = 14.5, P = 0.005. For data in F–I, N = 3 NAc acute brain sections from 3 mice (9 NAc acute brain sections total) and data was plotted as mean +/- SEM. Mice used for these experiments were not treated with 4-hydroxytamoxifen. Source data used to generate all graphs are provided as a Source Data file.
Mitochondrial remodeling is evident at the earliest stages of microglial responses to inflammatory challenge
Microglia respond to a wide variety of CNS insults that vary substantially in both the nature of the insult (injury vs. infection vs. disease process vs. pathological electrical activity, etc.) as well as the time course over which microglial responses emerge and evolve (minutes to months). Given lack of clear evidence for mitochondrial involvement in rapid microglial responses to tissue injury, we sought to further explore the relationship between mitochondria and microglial phenotypic remodeling using a pathological insult of distinct modality as well as time course. Intraperitoneal (i.p.) injections of lipopolysaccharide (LPS), a component of the cell wall of gram-negative bacteria, were used to model inflammatory responses that accompany infection. Microglia show prominent changes in gene expression within hours of LPS injection and changes in morphology by 24–48 hours post-injection53. In vitro LPS exposure alters microglial mitochondrial structure and function54,55,56,57 and, in macrophages, mitochondrial alterations play an essential role in enabling and regulating changes in macrophage attributes as they respond to inflammatory challenges24,25,26,27,29,58,59. All together, these findings suggest that there may be important relationships between mitochondria, as organelles, and microglial responses to inflammatory challenge.
Young adult (3-4mo) MG-MitoGFP mice were given i.p. injections of saline or LPS and microglial gene- and protein-expression were analyzed via FACS, using the previously described gating strategy to identify and isolate microglia (Fig. S1D), followed by downstream qPCR (Fig. 4A). High expression of key microglial genes (Cx3cr1 and P2ry12) and little to no expression of oligodendrocyte-lineage, astrocyte-, and neuron-specific genes (Fig. S4A) confirmed fidelity of our microglial isolation. Within 4 h of LPS challenge, microglia from both striatum (STR, containing NAc) and midbrain (MB, containing VTA) upregulated transcripts for pro-inflammatory factors (Il1β, Tnfα), and downregulated transcripts for homeostatic microglial genes (Tgfβ1, P2ry12, Cx3cr1), consistent with previous studies53,60. Upregulation of genes associated with microglial phagocytic function (Cd45, Itgam) was evident by 24 h post-injection (Fig. 4B, S4B and Table S1, S2). Overall, STR and MB microglia responded similarly to LPS challenge at the gene expression level.
A Schematic of the experiment design, created partially in BioRender https://BioRender.com/yedibtm. 3-4mo MG-MitoGFP mice were injected with saline or lipopolysaccharide (LPS) prior to FACS isolation of STR/MB microglia and downstream qPCR analysis. B Heatmaps showing relative expression levels (2-ΔCt) of key microglial function and mitochondrial function genes. Z-scores represent average gene expression across treatment groups and brain regions. See Tables S1 and S2 for Two-way ANOVAs and post hoc comparisons with Bonferroni correction. Treatment: * P < 0.05, ** P < 0.01, *** P < 0.001. Brain region difference: $ P < 0.05. (Saline STR N = 7 mice, Saline MB N = 7 mice, LPS 4 h STR N = 7 mice, LPS 4 h MB N = 6 mice, LPS 24 h STR N = 7 mice, LPS 24 h MB N = 7 mice). C PC1 and PC2 of Principal Component Analysis of samples using only mitochondrial function genes. D Heatmaps depicting the degree of correlation between expression levels of microglial function genes (pro-inflammatory - Cd45, Il1β, Tnfα; homeostatic - Cx3cr1, P2ry12, Tgfβ1) and mitochondrial function genes as determined by robust regression analysis with false discovery rate correction. See Table S3 for R- and P-values. * P < 0.05, ** P < 0.01, *** P < 0.001. E Representative FACS contour plots showing TMRM and GFP fluorescence intensity of microglia from Saline, LPS 4 h, and LPS 24 h mice. F Median Fluorescence Intensity of GFP, TMRM (normalized to each cell’s GFP to account for mitochondrial mass), and CD45 in STR and MB microglia from Saline (N = 7, squares), LPS 4 h (N = 7, triangles), and LPS 24 h (N = 7, circles) mice. One-way ANOVAs and post hoc comparisons with Bonferroni correction: GFP STR, F(2,18) = 25.06735, P < 0.0001; GFP MB, F(2,18) = 29,85264, P < 0.0001; TMRM STR, F(2,18) = 19.2316, P < 0.0001; TMRM MB, F(2,18) = 6.61021, P = 0.00704; CD45 STR, F(2,18) = 5.52274, P = 0.01348; CD45 MB, F(2,18) = 2.99003, P = 0.07565. * P < 0.05, ** P < 0.01, *** P < 0.001. Data was plotted as mean +/- SEM. Mice used for these experiments were not treated with 4 hydroxytamoxifen. Source data used to prepare all graphs are provided as a Source Data file.
Microglial expression of mitochondrial-function related genes was also altered at both 4 h and 24 h post injection (Figs. 4B, S4B and Tables S1, S2). Within 4 h of LPS challenge, genes related to mitochondrial ROS handling (Sod2, Cat), mitochondrial fission (Dnm1l), and mitochondrial biogenesis (Nrf1) were significantly altered. Some of these gene expression changes were maintained into 24 h post injection (Sod2, Dnm1l), while others appeared more restricted to the 4 h time point (Cat, Nrf1). At 24 h post injection, prominent upregulation of electron transport chain component genes Ndufa12 (Complex I), Cox4i1 (Complex IV), and Atp5d (Complex V) emerged. Genes related to mitochondrial calcium handling (Vdac1, Micu1) were also significantly altered. Again, most gene expression changes were similar across STR and MB (Figs. 4B, S4B and Tables S1, S2).
To probe the relationship between mitochondrial state and key features of microglia as they respond to inflammatory challenge, we used Principal Component Analysis (PCA) and found that PCA based solely on expression patterns of mitochondrial function-relevant genes can explain 64.7% of sample variation with the first 2 components and 81% of variation with the first 3 components (Fig. 4C and Fig. S4C). Moreover, 24 h post-injection samples cluster away from Saline samples (Fig. 4C) and 4 h post-injection samples are interspersed among Saline samples or skewed toward the 24 h samples. Hence, without even considering microglial inflammatory genes or homeostatic genes, microglia that are responding to LPS challenge can be clearly identified on the basis of their mitochondrial function profiles. We also used robust regression analyses and found numerous correlations between individual microglial-state and mitochondrial state genes (Fig. 4D and Table S3). For example, expression of homeostatic microglial gene P2ry12 showed significant correlation with electron transport chain (ETC) genes (Ndufa12, Sdha) as well as Tfam, which influences expression of mitochondrial DNA encoded ETC genes, in saline-treated animals, but the majority of these correlations were lost at 4 h post-LPS. Microglial pro-inflammatory genes ll1β and Tnfα showed significant correlation with mitochondrial biogenesis genes (Nrf1, Tfam), mitochondrial fusion and fission genes (Mnf1, Dnm1l) and the ROS handling gene Sod2 at 4 h post LPS (Fig. 4D and Table S3). Microglial- and mitochondrial- gene correlations remained abundant and continued to evolve at 24 h post LPS.
Together these data indicate that numerous facets of mitochondrial function are remodeled during microglial responses to inflammatory challenge and that mitochondrial remodeling begins at the earliest stages of microglial responses to inflammatory challenges. Moreover, examination of Cd68, a key microglial lysosome gene, hints that mitochondria, as organelles, may be uniquely positioned to regulate microglial functional state during inflammatory challenge. While LPS treatment increased the correlation between most mitochondria-relevant genes and key microglial function genes (Cd45, Cx3cr1, P2ry12, Tgfβ1) (Fig. 4D), LPS treatment did not modulate correlations between Cd68 and Cx3cr1, P2ry12, Tgfβ1 (correlations between Cd68 and Cd45 increased at 24 h post LPS) (Fig. S4D and Table S4). Moreover, while multiple mitochondria-relevant genes were positively correlated with expression of the microglial pro-inflammatory factors Tnfα and Il1β at 4 h post-LPS, Cd68 expression was not correlated with Tnfα and Il1β in any of the conditions examined (Fig. S4D).
The transcript-level, qPCR-based analyses presented thus far show high sensitivity for the detection of early changes in cell and organelle state following LPS challenge. To test protein-level changes following the LPS challenge, we analyzed data recorded during FACS isolation of microglia. These analyses revealed that the intensity of GFP, reflecting mitochondrial mass, was significantly increased at 24 h post-injection in both the STR and MB, with hints of emerging increases at 4 h post-injection (Fig. 4E, F). In contrast, mitochondrial membrane potential, as detected by TMRM intensity, decreased significantly at 24 h post LPS (Fig. 4E, F). These changes in mitochondrial mass and mitochondrial membrane potential were accompanied by significant protein-level increases in CD45 by 24 h in STR microglia and trends toward increased CD45 in MB microglia. Protein level expressions of CX3CR1 and P2RY12 differed across regions but not across treatment (Fig S4E). Microglial size, as indicated by forward scatter, was significantly elevated in both STR and MB by 24 h post LPS, while internal complexity (side scatter) remained unchanged (Fig S4E). These data confirm that changes in mitochondrial state at the protein and functional level are associated with changes in microglial protein-level expression and cell structure.
Increased mitochondrial mass and mitochondrial elongation are associated with microglial responses to inflammatory challenge
To investigate how LPS challenge impacts the morphology of microglial mitochondria, we analyzed fixed tissue from 3-4mo MG-MitoGFP mice (Fig. 5A, Fig. S5A) at 24 h post-LPS, when protein-level changes in microglia and their mitochondria were most evident via FACS (Fig. 4). 3D reconstruction of both microglia and their mitochondria in NAc and VTA revealed significant increases in mitochondrial mass at 24 h post LPS (Fig. 5B), consistent with FACS-based analyses of GFP and qPCR-based increases in mitochondrial biogenesis factor Nrf1. No significant changes in mitochondrial number (relative to cell volume) were detected (Fig. 5C) and, instead, microglial mitochondria showed significant elongation, as detected by increases in aspect ratio (Fig. 5D). Elongation of mitochondria has been associated with increased capacity for oxidative phosphorylation61,62,63, which would be consistent with the qPCR-based observation of robust increases in electron transport chain components (Ndufa12, Atp5d, Cox4i1) at 24 h post LPS (Fig. 4B). Collectively, these findings indicate that mitochondrial structural remodeling is a key component of microglial responses to inflammatory challenge.
A Representative images of NAc microglia (IBA1) and their mitochondria (GFP) from 3-4mo MG-MitoGFP mice injected with saline (left) or LPS 24 h (right). White and yellow boxes highlight microglial somas and cell processes shown at higher magnification in lower panels. B Field of view (FOV) microglial mitochondrial mass (FOV mitochondrial volume / FOV microglial cell volume) within NAc and VTA microglia of saline (squares) or LPS treated mice (circles); Two-way ANOVA with Bonferroni correction for post hoc comparisons: main effect of treatment, F(1,17) = 5.19787, P = 0.03579; main effect of region, F(1,17) = 0.0713, P = 0.079266. C FOV mitochondrial number (relative to FOV microglial cell volume) within NAc and VTA microglia of saline (squares) or LPS treated (circles) mice; Two-way ANOVA with Bonferroni correction for post hoc comparisons: main effect of treatment: F(1,17) = 0.23167, P = 0.63642; main effect of region, F(1,17) = 0.05079, P = 0.82438. D Average mitochondrial aspect ratio (longest axis / shortest axis) within NAc and VTA microglia of saline (squares) or LPS treated (circles) mice; Two-way ANOVA with Bonferroni correction for post hoc comparisons: main effect of treatment, F(1,17) = 10.19319, P = 0.00533; main effect of region, F(1,17) = 0.26571, P = 0.61286. Quantification for B-D from N = 5 saline-injected mice and N = 6 LPS-injected mice. Data for B-D was plotted as mean +/- SEM. *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01. Mice used for these experiments were not treated with 4 hydroxytamoxifen. Source data used to generate all graphs are provided as a Source Data file.
Microglial mitochondria undergo morphological and functional changes during aging
The results described above indicate that there are key relationships between mitochondria and region-specific microglial morphology (Fig. 1), as well as microglial expression of homeostatic genes and inflammatory factors in the context of an inflammatory insult (Fig. 4). Microglia exhibit numerous changes during aging, including altered morphology and inflammatory profile13,43,64,65,66. Altered mitochondrial function is heavily implicated in CNS aging, but aging-associated changes in mitochondria have not been investigated with cellular specificity67,68,69. Hence, whether and how mitochondrial remodeling is linked to changing microglial attributes during aging is unknown. We also showed previously that microglial responses to aging vary across brain regions, with VTA microglia displaying proliferative and inflammatory changes months before microglia in the NAc43. Whether there are links between mitochondrial state and early VTA microglial aging has also not been investigated.
To determine if aging-associated changes in microglial morphology and inflammatory profile are accompanied by changes in their mitochondria, we analyzed NAc and VTA microglial mitochondria in fixed tissue from middle-aged (12-13mo) and late middle-aged (16-18mo) MG-MitoGFP mice (Fig. 6A) and compared them to microglial mitochondria in young adult (2-3mo) mice. Tissues were treated with TrueBlack to quench autofluorescent aggregates (lipofuscin) that emerge during aging and any dim residual signals in microglia could be clearly distinguished from MG-MitoGFP signal during analysis (Fig. S6A)70. With age, mitochondrial mass tended to increase, particularly in the VTA, and significant increases in mitochondrial number (relative to cell volume) were observed in both NAc and VTA microglia (Fig. 6B, C). VTA microglia also showed significant increases in mitochondrial elongation at 16-18mo (Fig. 6B, C). Hence, at the level of mitochondrial structure, LPS challenge and aging both elicit similar types of mitochondrial remodeling.
A Representative images of NAc (left) and VTA (right) microglia (IBA1) and microglial mitochondria (GFP) from 2-3mo, 12-13mo, and 16-18mo MG-MitoGFP mice. Regions highlighted by yellow boxes shown at higher magnification in lower panels. B, C Field of view (FOV) mitochondrial mass, number, and aspect ratio of NAc and VTA microglia during aging, normalized to mean values from 2-3mo animals. 2-3mo (N = 7 mice), 12-13mo (N = 4 mice), and 16-18mo (N = 5 mice). One-way ANOVAs with Bonferroni correction for post hoc comparisons: mitochondrial mass NAc, F(2,13) = 0.43588, P = 0.65581, mitochondrial number NAc, F(2,13) = 11.5342, P = 0.00132, mitochondria aspect ratio NAc, F(2,13) = 2.54264, P = 0.11695, mitochondrial mass VTA, F(2,13) = 1.47803, P = 0.26401, mitochondrial number VTA, F(2,13) = 7.57294, P = 0.0066, mitochondrial aspect ratio VTA, F(2,13) = 24.40763, P < 0.0001. * P < 0.05. Data plotted as mean +/- SEM. D Representative FACS contour plots showing TMRM fluorescence intensity (measure of mitochondrial membrane potential) and GFP fluorescence intensity (mitochondrial abundance) of microglia from 2-3mo and 16-18mo MG-MitoGFP mice. E TMRM median fluorescence intensity (normalized to individual cell mitoGFP signal to account for mitochondrial abundance) of STR and MB microglia from 3mo (N = 6 STR, 6 MB) and 18mo (N = 5 STR, 6 MB) MG-MitoGFP mice. Two-way ANOVA with Bonferroni correction for post hoc comparisons: main effect of age, F(1,19) = 79.60044, P < 0.0001; main effect of region, F(1,19) = 0.1661, P = 0.68816. *** P < 0.001. Data was plotted as mean +/- SEM. F Cumulative probability distributions comparing TMRM fluorescence intensity across brain regions (STR black, MB red) in microglia from 2-3mo and 12-13mo C57Bl6 wildtype mice (top panels) and comparing TMRM fluorescence intensity across ages (2-3mo black, 12-13mo red, 16-18mo blue) in MB and STR microglia (bottom panels). * P < 0.05, Kolmogorov-Smirnov tests. Mice used for these experiments were not treated with 4 hydroxytamoxifen. Source data used to generate all graphs are provided as a Source Data file.
Although aging impacts microglia in both the NAc and VTA, key regional differences in microglial aging are also apparent. VTA microglia show more prominent lysosome swelling, proliferation, and inflammatory profiles, while NAc microglia show more prominent reductions in cell branching complexity43. To further explore how regional differences in microglial aging relate to mitochondrial remodeling during aging, within-mouse comparisons were carried out using paired t-tests. This analysis revealed that the elevated mitochondrial mass and mitochondrial number in VTA microglia relative to NAc microglia that were observed at 2-3mo were no longer significant at 12-13mo and 16-18mo, likely due to increased mouse-to-mouse variation (Fig. S6B, C) and increased mitochondrial number (relative to cell volume) in NAc microglia. Finally, VTA microglia exhibited an elevated aspect ratio (greater mitochondrial elongation) relative to NAc microglia at 16-18mo (Fig. S6D). Therefore, some regional differences in microglial mitochondria that are evident in young adulthood (mitochondrial mass and number) are lost during aging, while other regional differences in microglial mitochondria are gained (elongation).
To further explore how aging impacts microglial mitochondria, we used the previously described gating strategy (Fig. S1D) for FACS-based analysis of microglia from 3mo and 18mo MG-mitoGFP mice. This analysis revealed that the median fluorescence intensity of GFP was significantly increased with age in both STR (containing NAc) and MB (containing VTA) microglia (Fig. S6E), pointing to increases in mitochondrial mass. Conversely, mitochondrial membrane potential (TMRM intensity normalized to GFP) was significantly reduced with age in both regions (Fig. 6D, E). To confirm changes to mitochondrial membrane potential and further elucidate the time course of such changes, we analyzed TMRM intensity of microglia from WT mice and included an intermediate 12–13mo time point. In this analysis, MB microglia exhibited slightly more depolarized mitochondrial membrane potential (lower TMRM intensity) than STR microglia in 2–3mo old mice (Fig. 6F). These regional differences grew progressively larger in 12-13mo old mice (Fig. 6F) and 16–18mo old mice (Fig. S6F). Examining the time course of TMRM changes within each region revealed subtle but significant depolarization in 12-13mo MB microglia and pronounced depolarization in 16-18mo MB microglia, compared to MB microglia from 2-3mo mice. Interestingly, STR microglia exhibited hyperpolarized mitochondrial membrane potential (higher TMRM intensity) in 12–13mo mice compared to 2–3mo mice. At 16-18mo, however, they showed depolarized mitochondrial membrane potential, relative to microglia from 2-3mo mice (Fig. 6F). Together, these findings indicate that the functional status of microglial mitochondria changes significantly during aging, with key differences in the time course and magnitude of these changes across brain regions. Moreover, they reveal that remodeling of microglial mitochondrial status begins in middle age, rather than in the late stages of aging.
Targeted genetic manipulation of microglial mitochondria elicits changes in microglial morphology and gene expression
Results presented thus far indicate that there are correlations between region-specific microglial morphology and mitochondrial mass/number. They also reveal correlations between mitochondrial mass, mitochondrial elongation, mitochondrial membrane potential, and changes in microglial morphology and inflammatory profiles during responses to LPS challenge and aging. To further probe whether there are causal links between mitochondria and these microglial phenotypic attributes, we crossed CX3CR1CreER/+ mice and CX3CR1CreER/+;mitoGFP mice with Tfamfl/fl mice to achieve targeted deletion of mitochondrial transcription factor A (TFAM) in microglia (MG-TFAMKO or MG-mitoGFP-TFAMKO) (Fig. 7A). TFAM deletion in diverse cell types leads to reduced expression of electron transport chain subunits encoded by mitochondrial DNA and gives rise to changes in mitochondrial membrane potential and mitochondrial morphology, making this an ideal genetic manipulation to further elucidate the relationship between mitochondrial and microglial phenotypes71,72,73,74,75.
A Schematic of transgenic crosses used to achieve microglial-specific deletion of TFAM in microglia with or without simultaneous GFP labeling of microglial mitochondria. B qPCR-based analysis of TFAM expression (fold change relative to control, 2-ΔΔCT) in FACS-isolated microglia from the midbrain (MB) and striatum (STR). Two-way ANOVA with Bonferroni correction for post hoc comparisons: main effect of genotype, F(1,24) = 115.410, P < 0.0001, main effect of brain region F(3,20) = 1.654, P = 0.213. N = 7 CTR mice (filled circles), N = 5 KO mice (open circles). C Representative high-magnification images of NAc microglia (IBA1) and mitochondria (GFP) from 5mo MG-mitoGFP (CTR) and MG-mitoGFP-TFAMKO (KO) mice. D Total mitochondrial volume within the field of view (FOV); Two-way ANOVA with Bonferroni correction for post hoc comparisons: main effect of genotype F(3,14) = 4.808, P = 0.046, main effect of region F(3,14) = 4.716, P = 0.046. E FOV mitochondrial number, Two-way ANOVA with Bonferroni correction for post hoc comparisons: main effect of genotype F(3,14) = 13.489, P = 0.002, main effect of brain region F(3,14) = 15.864, P = 0.0013. F Average FOV mitochondrial sphericity, Two-way ANOVA with Bonferroni correction for post hoc comparisons: main effect of genotype F(3,14) = 5.313, P = 0.037, main effect of brain region F(3,14) = 1.636, P = 0.221. G Microglial density, Two-way ANOVA with Bonferroni correction for post hoc comparisons: main effect of genotype F(3,14) = 1.666, P = 0.218, main effect of brain region F(3,14) = 96.163, P < 0.0001. H Microglial tissue coverage (FOV volume), Two-way ANOVA with Bonferroni correction for post hoc comparisons: main effect of genotype F(3,14) = 9.665, P = 0.007, main effect of brain region F(3,14) = 43.274, P < 0.0001. I Branching complexity of individual microglia (total number of Sholl intersections), NAc N = 27 CTR and N = 35 KO cells; VTA N = 25 CTR N = 33 KO cells, Two-way ANOVA with Bonferroni correction for post hoc comparisons: main effect of genotype F(3,116) = 10.314, P = 0.002, main effect of brain region F(3,116) = 45.863, P < 0.0001. J FOV mitochondrial number normalized to FOV microglial volume, Two-way ANOVA with Bonferroni correction for post hoc comparisons: main effect of genotype F(3,14) = 0.366, P = 0.554, main effect of brain region F(3,14) = 2.295, P = 0.152. K FOV mitochondrial mass (FOV mitochondrial volume normalized to FOV microglial volume), Two-way ANOVA with Bonferroni correction for post hoc comparisons: main effect of genotype F(3,14) = 0.119, P = 0.734, main effect of brain region F(3,14) = 4.728, P = 0.047. Data was plotted as mean +/- SEM. For panels D–H, Jand K, N = CTR 4 and 5 KO mice. For all data panels, CTR samples are represented by filled circles and KO samples are represented by open circles. Mice were treated with 4-hydroxytamoxifen and analyzed 2 months later as described in methods. * P < 0.05, ** P < 0.01,*** P < 0.001. Source data used to generate all graphs are provided as a Source Data file.
For these experiments, mice were injected with 4-hydroxytamoxifen and analyzed 2 months later to allow for both TFAM deletion and turnover of existing mitochondrial components that will be impacted by TFAM deletion, as mitochondrial proteins are among the most long-lived within the cell76. This interval also allows for the replacement of any peripheral CX3CR1+ cells that experience TFAM deletion in these mice. FACS followed by qPCR confirmed that this treatment paradigm resulted in downregulation of Tfam in both STR and MB microglia in MG-TFAMKO mice (Fig. 7B). Histology in fixed tissue revealed that microglial TFAM loss resulted in increased mitochondrial volume, mitochondrial number, and mitochondrial sphericity at the tissue (FOV) level in MG-mitoGFP-TFAMKO mice (Fig. 7C–F, Fig. S7A). Mean intensity of the mitoGFP signal was also elevated in MG-mitoGFP-TFAMKO mice in both NAc and VTA (Fig. S7A–C). This increase in GFP intensity appeared to vary substantially from cell-to-cell in MG-mitoGFP-TFAMKO mice and may reflect incomplete TFAM recombination in some microglia. Analysis of individual cells confirmed increases in mitochondrial number and trends toward increased mitochondrial sphericity in microglia from MG-mitoGFP-TFAMKO mice (Fig. S7D, E). This analysis also highlighted increased cell-cell variation in microglia from MG-mitoGFP-TFAMKO mice. Some properties of microglial mitochondria, such as FOV median and max mitochondrial volume, were unchanged following TFAM loss (Fig. S7F). Together, these findings confirm that this genetic manipulation induces changes to some of the same mitochondrial attributes (number, sphericity, GFP intensity) that differ across brain regions and that are remodeled during microglial responses to LPS and aging.
To determine how genetically-induced changes in mitochondrial status relate to microglial properties, we analyzed microglial density, tissue coverage, and individual microglial morphological complexity. Microglial density did not differ significantly between MG-mitoGFP-TFAMKO and control mice (Fig. 7G). However, microglial tissue coverage was significantly increased in both NAc and VTA microglia from MG-mitoGFP-TFAMKO mice (Fig. 7H), suggesting that this manipulation caused changes to microglial morphology. To investigate this possibility, we also reconstructed individual microglial cells and assessed branching complexity via Sholl analysis. The total number of Sholl intersections was elevated in microglia from MG-mitoGFP-TFAMKO mice, particularly in the NAc (Fig. 7I), supporting the idea that there are important links between mitochondrial state and microglial morphology. Moreover, this increase in morphological complexity suggests that TFAM deletion does not simply make microglia “reactive” or compromise their health. Finally, no significant changes were observed in FOV mitochondrial number (relative to FOV microglial volume) or mitochondrial mass in MG-mitoGFP-TFAMKO mice (Fig. 7J–K), which would be expected if both microglial volume and mitochondrial number/volume are increased in these mice.
To further elucidate how genetically targeted manipulation of microglial mitochondria affects microglial properties, we used FACS analysis of STR and MB microglia (gated via the previously described strategy, Fig. S1D) as well as qPCR for a panel of microglial- and mitochondrial-function related genes. FACS analysis revealed significant increases in microglial forward scatter (FSC, cell size) and side scatter (SSC, internal cellular complexity) in MG-TFAMKO samples (Fig. 8A), consistent with observed increases in microglial tissue coverage/volume (Fig. 7H). Protein level expression of CD45 and CX3CR1 (median fluorescence intensity, MFI, measured during FACS) differed across brain regions, but was not significantly altered by TFAM loss. qPCR analysis revealed that multiple mitochondria-related genes were altered in response to TFAM knockout. This included increased expression of genes coding for components of the electron transport chain (Ndufa12, Atp5d, Cox4i1, Sdha), as well as genes related to mitochondrial ROS (Sod2 and Cat) and calcium handling (Micu1, Fig. 8B, Fig. S8A and Table S5). Mitochondrial biogenesis genes Nrf1 and Ppargc1a also showed significant changes, but in opposite directions (Fig. 8B, Fig. S8A and Table S5). Mitochondrial fusion gene Dnm1l was significantly decreased and there were no significant changes in expression of mitochondrial fission-associated gene Mfn1 (Fig. 8B, Fig. S8A and Table S5). Together, these data indicate that loss of microglial TFAM induces broad changes to expression of nuclear-encoded, mitochondria-relevant genes and suggest that multiple aspects of mitochondrial function are impacted by this manipulation.
A Median Fluorescence Intensity for forward scatter (FSC, cell size), side scatter (SSC, internal cellular complexity), CD45, and CX3CR1 in STR and MB microglia from N = 7 CTR mice (filled circles) and N = 6 TFAM KO mice (open circles). See Table S5 for F and P values from Two-way ANOVAs with Bonferroni correction for post hoc comparisons. B Heatmaps showing relative expression levels (2-ΔCt) of key microglial function and mitochondrial function-related genes in each group. Z-scores represent average gene expression across genotypes and brain regions. See Table S5 for F and P values from Two-way ANOVA with Bonferroni correction for post hoc comparisons. * P < 0.05, ** P < 0.01, *** P < 0.001, significant effect of treatment, post hoc comparison with Bonferroni correction. $ P < 0.05, significant effect of brian region, post hoc comparison with Bonferroni correction. (N = 7 mice for CTR STR and CTR MB, N = 5 mice for TFAM KO STR and TFAM KO MB). C Principal Component Analysis of control (STR filled gray circles, MB open gray circles) and MG-TFAMKO (STR filled black triangles, MB open black triangles) samples based on microglial- and mitochondrial-function related genes. D Median Fluorescence Intensity of GFP, FSC, SSC, and CXC3CR1 signal in STR and MB microglia from N = 6 CTR mice (filled circles) and N = 4 TFAM KO mice (open circles) 12 h after LPS injection. The dotted line represents the average signal of microglia from saline-injected MG-mitoGFP mice (shown in Fig. 4F and Fig S4D). See Table S6 for F and P values from Two-way ANOVA with Bonferroni correction for post hoc comparisons. * P < 0.05, ** P < 0.01, *** P < 0.001, post hoc comparison with Bonferroni correction. E Fold change (2-ΔΔCt) of key microglial genes Cd68, Itgam, Il1β, and Tgfβ1 in N = 5 LPS-treated CTR mice (filled circles) and N = 4 LPS-treated KO mice (open circles) relative to microglia from saline-treated mice. See Table S7 for F and P values from Two-way ANOVA with Bonferroni correction for post hoc comparisons. * P < 0.05, ** P < 0.01, *** P < 0.001, post hoc comparison with Bonferroni correction. F Principal Component Analysis of microglia from saline- (gray/black) and LPS-treated (pink/red) CTR (circles) and TFAM KO (triangles) mice based on expression levels of microglial- and mitochondrial- function related genes. Fold-change analyses in E and PCA in F incorporate data from saline-treated MG-mitoGFP mice (Fig. 4 and Fig. S4) as well as untreated MG-TFAMKO mice (Fig. 8B). Mice for these experiments were injected with 4-hydroxytamoxifen and analyzed 2 months later as described in methods. Data in A, D, and E was plotted as mean ± SEM. Source data for all graphs are provided as a Source Data file.
These alterations in mitochondrial state upon TFAM knockout were accompanied by significant changes in genes related to key microglial functions. Proinflammatory transcripts Il1β and Tnfα were significantly increased in MG-TFAMKO microglia while Ifnβ1 was significantly decreased. For multiple microglial genes that show regional differences in expression (Cd45, Cd68, P2ry12), these regional differences were preserved in TFAM knockout mice, and were not significantly modulated by TFAM loss. Instead, Tgfβ1 and Cx3cr1, which have both been implicated in modulation of overall microglial phenotypes, were significantly increased in microglia from MG-TFAMKO mice (Fig. 8C). Post hoc analysis revealed that many of the gene expression changes associated with TFAM KO occurred in a brain region-specific manner. Increases in Tnfα were primarily observed in MB TFAM knockout samples, while increases in Tgfβ1 and Cx3cr1 were only prominent in STR TFAM knockout microglia (Fig. 8C and Table S5). Leveraging PCA analysis to examine these gene expression changes in an integrated fashion revealed that MG-TFAMKO samples from STR and MB appeared to cluster separately from one another (Fig. 8C and Fig. S8B–C), providing further evidence that manipulating mitochondrial function exerts distinct effects on STR and MB microglia.
Loss of TFAM causes subtle changes in LPS-induced mitochondrial remodeling and microglial responses to inflammatory challenge
In addition to defining how mitochondrial manipulation impacts basal microglial phenotypes, we sought to investigate the impact of TFAM knockout on microglial ability to respond to an inflammatory challenge. To this end, MG-mitoGFP-TFAMKO and MG-mitoGFP control mice were given i.p. injections of LPS, and microglial gene- and protein-expression were analyzed via FACS and downstream qPCR. To maximize ability to detect protein level alterations, as well as catch potential differences in time course of microglial transcriptional responses, samples were collected and analyzed at an intermediate time point (12 h) between those examined previously (4 h and 24 h, Figs. 4, 5). On the whole, TFAM loss did not appear to substantially impair remodeling of microglial mitochondria following LPS treatment. For example, both microglia from MG-mitoGFP control and MG-mitoGFP-TFAMKO mice showed increased mitoGFP at 12 h post LPS (Fig. 8D), consistent with previous observations of increased mitoGFP at 24 h post LPS (Fig. 4F). Moreover, the magnitude of the mitoGFP increase did not differ across genotypes. TMRM levels, which were seen to decrease at 24 h post LPS (Fig. 4F), had not yet declined at 12 h post LPS and did not differ across genotypes (Fig. S8D). Similarly, at the transcript level, LPS-induced changes in expression of mitochondria-relevant genes appeared to proceed irrespective of TFAM loss (Table S6). For example, Sod2 (up-regulated at 4 h and 24 h compared to saline) and Vdac1 (down-regulated at 4 h compared to saline) were still up- and down-regulated in TFAM KO microglia at 12 h post LPS (Fig. S8F, G). In cases where significant differences were observed across genotypes, many of these were already evident without LPS challenge. For example, Cox4i was elevated in TFAM KO microglia relative to controls at baseline (Fig. 8B), and it remained elevated relative to controls after LPS (Fig. S8H).
The microglial response to LPS-challenge was also largely preserved at both the protein- and gene-expression, irrespective of TFAM loss. Microglia from both MG-mitoGFP control and MG-mitoGFP-TFAMKO mice showed increases in FSC (cell size) at 12 h post injection (Fig. 8D), consistent with observations at 24 h post LPS (Fig. 4F). TFAM KO microglia showed significantly higher FSC than control microglia, but this increased FSC was already evident in the absence of LPS treatment (Fig. 8A). Regional differences in expression of CD45 and CX3CR1 across STR and MB that were present at baseline in TFAM KO and control microglia (Fig. 4F, Fig. S4E, Fig. 8A) remained present at 12 h post LPS (Figs. 8D, and S8D). At the transcript level, the prominent increases in Tnfα and Il1β that are observed following LPS injection (Fig. 4B), were still observed in TFAM KO microglia (Fig. 8E and Fig. S8H) and did not differ significantly in magnitude from responses in control microglia. Similarly, LPS-induced downregulation of homeostatic transcripts Tgfβ1 and Cx3cr1 did not differ across genotypes (Fig. 8E and Fig. S8I). Expression levels of Cd68 and Itgam did differ significantly across genotypes, with TFAM KO microglia showing more muted reductions in expression compared to control samples at 12 h post LPS injection (Fig. 8E).
Altogether, these subtle differences in response to LPS challenge were evident in PCA analysis comparing the gene expression patterns of saline-treated MG-mitoGFP samples (Fig. 4B), untreated MG-TFAMKO samples (Fig. 8B), and 12 h LPS-treated control and MG-mitoGFP-TFAMKO samples. This analysis revealed that LPS-treatment was the strongest driver of sample clustering (Fig. 8G) on PC1, with genotype effects being evident on PC2. Together, these data suggest that microglial mitochondrial remodeling and changes in microglial attributes in response to acute inflammatory challenge remain largely intact in MG-mitoGFP-TFAMKO mice. Future studies using repeated or chronic inflammatory challenge will be needed to determine whether the subtle differences in mitochondrial remodeling that were observed lead to more prominent downstream shifts in microglial function.
Discussion
Changes in mitochondrial function have been associated with developmental delays, epilepsy, psychiatric disorders, aging, and neurodegeneration77,78. A key priority in uncovering how mitochondria are linked to CNS pathology is understanding how mitochondria impact the function of specific CNS cells. However, because mitochondrial structure and molecular composition vary widely across distinct cell types39, findings about the functional roles of these organelles cannot be generalized, and mitochondria need to be studied with cellular specificity. Our study provides detailed information about microglial mitochondria and supports the idea that mitochondrial function is distinct across CNS cells. We observed that mitochondria occupy about 4-6% of microglial volume, and entire microglial branches sometimes have few, if any, mitochondria (Figs. 1, 2). This is similar to mature oligodendrocytes, where mitochondria make up about 4% of cell volume79 but unlike astrocytes where mitochondria make up about 80% of astrocyte volume in young adult mice80. Qualitatively, our experiments using TMRM incubation in acute brain sections also suggest that microglial mitochondria are less hyperpolarized than mitochondria of surrounding cells (Fig. S1H). Hence, our study underscores the need for cell-specific study of mitochondria in CNS cells and argues for caution in assuming that relationships between mitochondria and cell function in one cell type will also hold true for other cell types.
Previous studies have suggested that mitochondrial function in microglia changes in the context of disease, stress, and immune activation31,32,52,53,54. Almost nothing is known, however, about how these organelles are linked to the physiological functions of microglia. We found key relationships between mitochondrial abundance and total process length as well as branching complexity of microglia (Fig. 1). Hence, even if microglia have fewer mitochondria than other CNS cells, our data suggest that these organelles play a key role in shaping the general cellular architecture of microglia. This finding is further supported by our observation that targeted manipulation of microglial mitochondria (deletion of microglial TFAM) led to increased branching complexity of NAc and VTA microglia (Fig. 7I), as well as increased cell size assessed via FACS (Fig. 8A). Our qPCR-based analyses also indicated that expression of critical homeostatic microglial gene P2ry12 was significantly correlated with expression of multiple mitochondrial genes under basal conditions. Moreover, targeted manipulation of microglial mitochondria (deletion of microglial TFAM) increased expression of the homeostatic microglial genes Cx3cr1 and Tgfβ1, providing further evidence that the state of mitochondria impacts multiple molecules involved in basal microglial phenotypes. Finally, regional specialization is also a key feature of homeostatic microglia6,9,10,30,42, and we found that regional differences in microglial cellular phenotypes were accompanied by regional differences in mitochondrial mass, mitochondrial number, and mitochondrial membrane potential in young adult mice (Figs. 1, 6). Altogether, these observations indicate that mitochondrial status is tightly linked to key microglial attributes under physiological conditions.
Additional studies will be required to fully elucidate the significance for physiological microglial function if a microglial cell exhibits higher mitochondrial mass, mitochondrial number, and/or distinct mitochondrial membrane potential. Increased mitochondrial mass, at the most basic level, means that a cell exhibits increased volume of mitochondria relative to the cell volume. While this could imply, simplistically, that a given cell has elevated energetic needs, the interpretation of increased mitochondrial mass is not so straightforward. Abundance of electron transport chain (ETC) components can vary across individual mitochondria81,82, meaning that more mitochondrial volume does not automatically equate to enhanced capacity for oxidative phosphorylation and ATP production. Some mitochondria lack cristae and are specialized in the reductive synthesis of macromolecules81 needed to support growth and other cellular functions. The subcellular localization of mitochondria also matters. For example, mitochondria at pre-synaptic terminals in neurons play critical roles in calcium buffering83. Alternatively, mitochondria positioned together with ER membranes play critical roles in lipid synthesis and regulation of autophagy and inflammasome activation84. Thus, an elevated mitochondrial mass could have different functional implications depending on subcellular location.
In the present study, we did not observe obvious differences in subcellular distribution of mitochondria between NAc and VTA microglia (Fig. S2G–I) nor did we observe significant differences in the morphology/elongation of individual mitochondria (Fig. S2B–E) across these brain regions. We previously found via RNAseq of NAc and VTA microglia that the latter express higher levels of Vdac1 and Vdac2 (mitochondrial calcium channels) as well as Sod2 (reactive oxygen species buffer). At the same time, VTA microglia express lower levels of Atp5k and Atp5g2 (components of the ATP synthase). Taken together, these observations raise the possibility that elevated mitochondrial number and mitochondrial mass in VTA microglia may be related to non-ATP production functions of mitochondria. This idea would also be consistent with the observation of more depolarized mitochondrial membrane potential (lower TMRM intensity) observed in MB microglia (Fig. 6F), as mitochondrial membrane potential fuels ATP production. Future studies can employ genetically encoded mitochondrial calcium indicators and genetically encoded mitochondrial ROS indicators, as well as strategies to perturb mitochondrial calcium channels and ROS regulatory molecules in microglia, to further elucidate the functional significance of regional differences in microglial mitochondrial mass and number.
The idea that non-ATP-producing functions of mitochondria are important for microglia is also supported by our unexpected finding that microglial cell process motility did not show a positive correlation with the abundance of mitochondria (Fig. 2). We also analyzed the movement of the mitochondria themselves and observed the same forms of dynamic mitochondrial remodeling (fission, fusion, trafficking) described in other cell types. Yet, we failed to find any association between mitochondrial displacement and cell process motility, suggesting that mitochondrial trafficking to specific subcellular locations is not required for overall baseline microglial tissue surveillance. Connections between the abundance of mitochondria and cell process remodeling of fine branchlets may exist, however. Using in vivo multiphoton imaging, Pietramale and colleagues found that microglial branchlets with fewer mitochondria were more likely to be fully retracted85. Finally, we found that mitochondria are relatively stable within microglia as they rapidly extend cell processes toward focal laser lesions (Fig. 3). Similar responses were observed in vivo by Pietramale and colleagues during early phases of microglial responses to a laser lesion. Intriguingly, at longer intervals post-lesion (6 h) they did observe significant mitochondrial remodeling in nearby microglia, suggesting roles for these organelles in microglial injury responses over hours-to-days85. Microglial tissue surveillance and rapid tissue injury responses are assumed to be energy-intensive processes. It may be, however, that the more rapid, albeit less efficient, process of glycolysis provides the primary energetic support for microglial tissue surveillance and injury-responsive motility. Future studies will need to investigate highly localized relationships between microglial filopodia and nearby mitochondria to examine whether mitochondrial membrane potential or other features of mitochondrial state (e.g., fission and fusion) are linked to movement of adjacent cell processes. Improvements in optical tools for the detection of ATP86 and glycolytic function can also be used in conjunction with the assessment of mitochondrial abundance and localization to expand our understanding of how these organelles do or do not support the energetics of microglial motility.
Our LPS experiments indicate that remodeling of mitochondrial function is an early and prominent component of microglial responses to inflammatory challenge. Our finding of mitochondrial elongation following an LPS challenge differs from in vitro experiments that found fragmented mitochondria in primary microglia treated with LPS for 24 h54. Differences between in vitro versus in vivo microglia and direct versus systemic LPS treatment likely contribute to these distinct findings. In our experiments, rapid increases in microglial Tnfα and Il1β mRNA were accompanied by altered expression of multiple mitochondrial-relevant genes (Fig. 4). Moreover, expression levels of Tnfα, Il1β, and Cd45 in individual samples at 4 h post-LPS were significantly correlated with expression levels of genes involved in mitochondrial fission and fusion, calcium handling, and ROS handling, in addition to genes involved in mitochondrial biogenesis and oxidative phosphorylation. These findings support the possibility that mitochondrial signaling regulates changes in microglial attributes rather than simply altering energy production to support a newly emerging cellular phenotype. The idea that mitochondrial state may regulate inflammatory profiles of microglia is further supported by the increased expression of Tnfα and Il1β in TFAM KO microglia, particularly in the midbrain (Fig. 8B). These qPCR results also suggest important future directions for investigation of the links between mitochondria and microglial inflammatory responses. For example, the surge in mitochondrial biogenesis transcription factor Nrf1 at 4h post LPS (Fig. 4B) followed by significant increases in mitoGFP signal by 12h post LPS (Fig. 8D) suggests that targeted impairment of mitochondrial biogenesis capacity may be a fruitful strategy for dissecting how these organelles regulate microglial responses to inflammatory challenge.
Although TFAM deletion led to significant increases in microglial branching (Fig. 7I), overall cell size (Fig. 8A), and expression of inflammatory and homeostatic microglial genes (Fig. 8B), the impact of TFAM loss on acute microglial responses to LPS was relatively muted (Fig. 8D–F). A key consideration in interpreting these results is that TFAM loss did not substantially interfere with ability of microglia to increase mitochondrial biogenesis (increase mitoGFP) and alter expression of nuclear-encoded, mitochondria-relevant genes in response to LPS challenge. Hence, additional mitochondria-targeted manipulations will be needed to fully elucidate the relationship between these organelle and microglial responses to inflammatory challenge. Given that TFAM-KO microglia exhibit distinct morphology and expression of inflammatory and homeostatic genes at baseline, it will also be of interest to examine their responses to more chronic or repeated challenges, such as those encountered during normative aging or in the context of neurodegenerative disease. Although the impact of TFAM loss on acute inflammatory microglial responses is subtle, the cumulative effect of these subtle changes during a chronic challenge may be substantial.
Importantly, targeted manipulation of microglial mitochondria did not impact MB and STR microglia in the same way (Fig. 8C), suggesting that mitochondrial regulation of microglial function is not equivalent throughout the brain. Following TFAM loss, MB microglia showed substantial changes in proinflammatory genes (upregulation of Tnfα and Il1β, and downregulation of Ifnβ1). STR microglia, instead, exhibited prominent upregulation of homeostatic genes Cx3cr1 and Tgfβ1. These findings align with some of our prior observations of regional differences in microglial responses to aging. Previously, we showed that VTA microglia exhibit early proliferative and inflammatory responses compared to NAc microglia during aging43. In the current study, we demonstrated similar trends in mitochondria, with MB microglia showing earlier and more prominent aging-induced changes to mitochondrial membrane potential compared to STR microglia (Fig. 6). When combined with our observation that targeted manipulation of microglial mitochondria leads to prominent changes in inflammatory factor expression specifically in MB microglia (Fig. 8), our findings support the idea that VTA/MB microglia are uniquely vulnerable to perturbations of mitochondrial function and that mitochondrial function is intimately linked to inflammatory profiles of these MB microglia.
Multiple mutations that increase risk for neurodegenerative disease are in mitochondrial-relevant genes19,87,88 and microglia themselves are also highly implicated in shaping risk for and progression of neurodegeneration. Several recent studies have begun investigating links between microglial mitochondria and neurodegeneration, but more research is needed. Microglia deficient in mitochondrial complex I activity induced glial inflammation, synapse loss and premature death in juvenile mice35 but, conversely, blocking complex I activity was neuroprotective in an EAE-model of multiple sclerosis36. Similarly, age- and disease model-dependent findings have emerged using models of Alzheimer’s disease. In 5x FAD mice, microglial deletion of a subunit of complex III resulted in increased microglial coverage of amyloid beta plaques and decreased plaque number37, while deletion of microglial mitochondrial translocator protein (TSPO) impaired microglial phagocytosis of amyloid beta in a different mouse model of Alzheimer’s38. Future studies should delve into whether mitochondria-associated disease risk stems from brain region-specific impact of mitochondrial function on neuroprotective vs. neurotoxic phenotypes of microglia.
Several limitations of our study are important to note. First, we carried out our studies using light microscopy, and this limits the ability to determine if densely packed mitochondria remain distinct or are part of a larger, interconnected mitochondrial network. In microglial somas, this was particularly evident, and future studies using super-resolution approaches such as STED imaging will be needed to more clearly determine if there are changes in degree of mitochondrial interconnectedness in microglial somas across brain regions, during aging, or following pathological challenges. A second limitation of our study is that border-associated macrophages (BAMs) can also be labeled by Iba1 immunostaining and are expected to experience recombination and mitoGFP expression in CX3CR1CreER/+;mitoGFP mice. As BAMs are primarily concentrated in the meninges and vascular interfaces and are significantly less abundant than microglia, we are confident that our results are focused on parenchymal microglia89. Nonetheless, future studies employing markers of BAMs can explicitly analyze the mitochondria of BAMs and identify similarities and differences of BAM and microglial mitochondria and how these organelles regulate cell function.
Important future directions for this work and for the field also include deeper investigation of whether there are sex differences in microglial mitochondrial function. Both male and female mice were included in our study, and we did not observe clear sex differences in most analyses of mitochondrial number, elongation, and remodeling following LPS challenge (Fig. S9). However, we did observe potential overall elevations of mitochondrial mass in microglia from female mice compared to microglia from male mice (Fig. S9A). Sex differences in microglial function are increasingly recognized in multiple contexts, including neurodevelopment and neurodegenerative disease90 and this will be an important area to explore further. Finally, mitochondria are highly complex organelles with numerous functions beyond ATP production. Our study provides insight into how these organelles align with key physiological properties of microglia as well as their attributes during responses to CNS insults. To expand upon this work and continue to elucidate how mitochondria impact microglial attributes and functions, we need to develop more tools that allow cell-specific manipulation of discrete facets of mitochondrial function, such as calcium buffering, lipid metabolism, ROS handling, and interactions with other organelles.
Methods
Mouse lines
C57Bl6 WT mice were obtained from the NIA Aged Rodent Colony and housed in the UCLA vivarium for at least one month before experiments. CX3CR1CreER/+ mice were originally obtained from Jackson Labs (stock #025524) and subsequently maintained in our colony41. Rosa26-lsl-mito-GFP mice (mitoGFP mice) were obtained from Dr. Jeremy Nathans (Johns Hopkins University) and are available at Jackson Labs (stock #021429). These mice enable cre-dependent expression of GFP that is fused to an N-terminal signal derived from mouse cytochrome c oxidase, subunit VIIIa, enabling specific localization to mitochondria40. Ai14 TdTomato reporter mice were obtained from Jackson Labs (stock #007914) and subsequently maintained in our colony46. Mice used for experiments were heterozygous for these transgenes. Tfamfl/fl floxed mice were obtained from Jackson Laboratories and have loxP sites flanking exons 6-7 of the transcription factor A, mitochondrial (Tfam) gene (stock #026123)75. These mice were crossed to the CX3CR1CreER mice with a final breeding strategy to generate CX3CR1CreER;Tfamfl/fl and CX3CR1CreER;Tfam+/+ littermate controls. In all experiments, balanced numbers of male and female mice were used. Mice were housed in a normal light/dark cycle and had ad libitum access to food and water. All experiments were performed in strict accordance to an animal use protocol (ARC−2018-103) approved by the Animal Care and Use Committees at UCLA.
Tamoxifen injections
In general, experiments were carried out without treating mice with tamoxifen. For select experiments as noted, 4-Hydroxytamoxifen (H7904-25mg, 95% pure z-isomer) was dissolved at 20 mg/mL in ethanol. For injections preparation, 4-OHT was redissolved in ethanol and diluted in a 1:4 mixture of castor oil:sunflower seed oil (Sigma, Cat #s 259853 and S5007) to give a final concentration of 1 mg/kg. CX3CR1CreER/+;mitoGFP mice at 3-4 mos received intraperitoneal injections of 4-OHT or vehicle (oil mixture) twice a day for 3 days at 1 mg/kg. Mice were euthanized 3 weeks later for immunohistochemistry and flow cytometry. CX3CR1CreER/+;mitoGFP;Tfamfl/fl mice and CX3CR1CreER/+;Tfamfl/fl at 3-4 mos received injections of 4-Hydroxytamoxifen twice a day for 3 days at 1 mg/kg. The mice were housed for 2 months after injections to allow for turnover of long-lived mitochondrial proteins76,91. Mice were then euthanized for immunohistochemistry or flow cytometry.
Lipopolysaccharide injections
CX3CR1CreER/+;mitoGFP and CX3CR1CreER/+;mitoGFP;Tfamfl/fl mice 3 to 7 months (mos) of age received single intraperitoneal injections of 1 mg/kg of Lipopolysaccharide (LPS) (Millipore Sigma, strain O55:B5, cat# L2880-25MG) or saline. All injections were performed around ~10am. For immunohistochemistry, mice were deeply anesthetized via isoflurane inhalation and transcardially perfused with 1 M phosphate-buffered saline (PBS; pH 7.4) followed by ice-cold 4% paraformaldehyde (PFA) in 1 M PBS. For flow cytometry, mice were deeply anesthetized via isoflurane inhalation and transcardially perfused with 10 mL of chilled 1 M PBS. Timepoints for experiments were 4 h, 12 h, or 24 h post-injection.
Tissue collection and immunohistochemistry
Mice were deeply anesthetized via isoflurane inhalation and transcardially perfused with 1 M PBS followed by ice-cold 4% PFA in 1 M PBS. Brain tissue was isolated and postfixed in PFA for ~4 h at 4 °C and then stored in 1 M PBS with 0.1% sodium azide until sectioning. Coronal brain sections were prepared using a vibratome at 60 µm thickness. For immunostaining, free-floating brain sections were washed with 1 M PBS (5min) and then permeabilized and blocked in a solution of 2% bovine serum albumin (BSA), 3% normal donkey serum (NDS), and 0.01% Triton-X for 2 h with rotation at room temperature. Sections were then incubated overnight with primary antibodies prepared in 2% bovine serum albumin (BSA) and 3% normal donkey serum (NDS) at 4 °C with rotation. Sections from aged mice were incubated in TrueBlack lipofuscin autofluorescence quencher, (5%; Biotium cat: 23007) for 60 s followed by a 3×5 min rinse in 1 M PBS prior to incubation with primary antibodies. Following primary antibody incubation, sections were washed 3x with 1 M PBS and then incubated with secondary antibodies prepared in 2% bovine serum albumin (BSA) and 3% normal donkey serum (NDS) at room temperature for 2 h with rotation. This was followed by washes in 1 M PBS (3x) with a second wash containing 1:4000 dilution of DAPI in 1 M PBS. Sections were mounted using Aqua-Poly/Mount (Polysciences cat: 18606) and cover-slipped. Primary antibodies used include: rabbit anti- Iba1 (1:800; Wako, catalog #019-19741), rat anti-CD68 (1:200; clone FA11, AbD Serotec, catalog #MCA1957), chicken anti-TH (1:500; Aves, catalog #TYH). Secondary antibody combinations include rabbit AlexaFluor-647, chicken AlexaFluor-594, rat AlexaFluor-594, or chicken AlexaFluor-405 (used at 1:1000; all raised in donkey; Jackson ImmunoResearch Laboratories). For each set of analyses, three brain sections containing nucleus accumbens (NAc) and prefrontal cortex (PFC) and three brain sections containing ventral tegmental area (VTA) were chosen from each mouse. Brain sections were selected based on well-defined anatomical parameters and were matched for anterior-posterior location.
Confocal image acquisition and analysis
Fixed tissue slides were imaged using a Zeiss LSM880 or Zeiss LSM700 confocal microscope. Within the NAc, images were acquired at the boundary between core and shell (identified anatomically) and include both subregions. In the VTA, images captured were medial to the medial lemniscus. For quantification of MitoGFP recombination within microglia, stacks of confocal images (z-stacks) with a z interval of 1 µm were taken using a 20x objective and imported into ImageJ software for analysis. Maximum intensity projections were counted manually for the % of microglia exhibiting MitoGFP expression. For 3D volumetric reconstruction of microglia and mitochondria, confocal z-stacks were acquired with a 63x objective and z interval of 0.3 µm and imported into Imaris (Bitplane) software for analysis. The surface reconstruction module was used for volumetric reconstruction of mitochondria and microglia within the entire field of view (FOV). Measures of the average volume of individual mitochondria, mitochondrial sphericity (degree of circularity, with 1 representing a perfect circle), and aspect ratio (longest axis of mitochondria / shortest axis of mitochondria) were generated within the Imaris surfaces module and exported for graphing and statistical testing. For FOV-based analyses, two or three images from separate brain sections were analyzed per mouse to obtain an average value for that mouse. 3 to 7 mice were analyzed per brain region, per age and/or per condition. In some cases, further analysis of individual microglia was carried out by selecting Imaris surfaces from an individual cell and the mitochondria within that cell. In these cases, 4-6 cells were analyzed per mouse. To select individual microglia for full 3D morphological reconstruction in MG-mitoGFP;Ai14 mice, the brain region of interest was located and centered using only TH staining and anatomical landmarks with 20x objectives. After switching to 63x objectives, TdTom+mitoGFP+ microglia within that field of view were imaged. Slight X-Y adjustments were made, if needed, to bring a TdTom+mitoGFP+ microglial cell away from the edge of the FOV to avoid truncating processes. Cells were excluded from reconstruction if their somas fell near the top or bottom edge of the brain slice rather than being situated near the middle of the z-stack. The Imaris filament tracer module was used for reconstruction and analysis of the branching morphology of individual cells, and surfaces were used to reconstruct mitochondria as described above. 1 or 2 cells were reconstructed per FOV per brain region, yielding 3-6 morphologically reconstructed cells per mouse. The Imaris filament tracer tool was also used for Sholl analysis, where each concentric circle was 1 μm apart. For analysis of mitoGFP signal intensity in MG-mitoGFP-TFAMKO and MG-mitoGFP control mice, mean fluorescence intensities for each individual, Imaris-reconstructed mitochondria in a field of view were extracted. Mean fluorescence intensity values for all reconstructed mitochondria from one mouse were then pooled (n = 3 FOVs per mouse per brain region) and a cumulative distribution plot for that mouse and brain region was generated. Cumulative distribution plots from all mice from one genotype and brain region were then averaged to generate an average cumulative distribution for that group.
Acute brain slice preparation
CX3CR1 CreER/+; mitoGFP or CX3CR1 CreER/+; mitoGFP; Ai14 mice at 1.5 to 2.5 months were anesthetized with isoflurane and perfused transcardially with 10 mL of oxygenated, ice-cold N-methyl-D-glucamine (NMDG)-based solution containing the following (in mM): 92 NMDG, 20 HEPES, 30 NaHCO3, 1.2 NaH2PO4, 2.5 KCl, 5 sodium ascorbate, 3 sodium pyruvate, 2 thiourea, 10 MgSO4, and 0.5 CaCl2, 10 glucose, pH 7.4 (310 mOsm). Brains were then rapidly dissected free and horizontal midbrain sections (230 μm thick) and coronal forebrain sections (300 μm thick) were prepared using a vibratome in ice cold NMDG-based cutting solution bubbled continuously with 95% O2 / 5% CO2. Following sectioning, sections were transferred to a holding chamber containing NMDG solution at 34 °C for 5 min and then transferred to artificial cerebrospinal fluid (aCSF) solution at room temperature for 30 min recovery containing the following (in mM): 125 NaCl, 2.5 KCl, 1.25 NaH2PO4•2H2O, 1 MgCl2•6H2O, 26 NaHCO3, 11 Glucose and 2.4 CaCl2•2H2O and bubbled continuously with 95% O2 / 5% CO2.
Acute brain slice multiphoton imaging
Acute brain slices from NAc and VTA were imaged using a Leica Stellaris 8 Dive, multiphoton microscope equipped with a Coherent Chameleon Ultra II laser and a Leica 25x/1.00 NA W motCORR objective. During video acquisition, acute brain slices were continuously perfused with aCSF bubbled with 95% O2 / 5% CO2. Videos were acquired at least 60 µm below the surface of the slice and video acquisition was carried out within 1–3 h after sectioning. For analysis of microglial mitochondria only in CX3CR1 CreER/+; mitoGFP mice, an excitation wavelength of 930 nm was used and GFP was detected via a non-descanned detector (464–542 nm). For analysis of microglial mitochondria and microglial cell process motility in CX3CR1 CreER/+; mitoGFP; Ai14 mice, an excitation wavelength of 930 nm was used, and GFP and TdTom signals were detected simultaneously via two non descanned detectors (detector 1: 463–537 nm, detector 2: 558–668 nm). Stacks of images encompassing entire microglial cells (z-step interval 1 µm) were acquired at 0.02 Hz (for mitochondrial motility only) and 0.008 Hz (mitochondrial motility + microglial cell process motility). To induce a focal laser lesion, exposure to high power illumination of 750 nm for 10 sec was applied 60 µm below the surface with maximal zoom in the space between 4-5 GFP+TdTom+ microglial cells. Imaging of microglia and their mitochondria post-lesion was then carried out as described above.
Analysis of microglial and mitochondrial motility
To analyze microglial and mitochondrial motility, 3Dmorph, a previously published automated analysis pipeline by York et al.92, was adapted for 2D analysis. Movies were pre-processed in ImageJ. Pre-processing included: background subtraction, median filter, drift correction (MultiStackReg ImageJ plugin), and bleach correction (Histogram matching ImageJ plugin). Individual cells were highlighted by ROI of maximum projections at each time point and the signal outside of ROI was removed. The adapted 3D morph script was applied to the final 2D movie to determine added/subtracted pixels, total pixels changed, and the area of TdTomato (microglia) and GFP (mitochondria) channels. To calculate microglial and mitochondrial motility, the total number of pixels altered during a 10-min interval were normalized to the total number of pixels making up the cell (cell area). For quantification focused on individual microglial branches, preprocessed videos were cropped to isolate entire primary branches of the cell from the point at which the primary branch connects to the cell soma out to the terminal endings of branches emanating from that primary process. Analysis and quantification were then carried out in the same manner as for entire cells. Mitochondrial mass of whole microglia or primary branching processes was calculated as GFP area divided by TdTomato area in final frame. Morphological complexity of microglia was analyzed using Sholl analysis through the Simple Neurite Tracer plugin in ImageJ42. Each concentric circle was 1 μm apart, like the morphological analysis conducted in fixed tissue. Values from Sholl analysis of cell branching in the first and last frame of 10-min videos were averaged to obtain an overall assessment of cell complexity throughout the imaging period. To analyze mitochondrial motility in 3D, additional analyses were carried out within Imaris (Bitplane) Software. The surface reconstruction module was used to create surfaces for GFP+ mitochondria in microglial cell processes where individual mitochondria can be easily tracked; microglial somas contain large mitochondrial networks, complicating tracking of individual mitochondria. 4D movement tracks were then generated for each reconstructed mitochondrion. Some manual editing of tracks was performed to ensure accurate tracking of reconstructed mitochondria across time. 3D positional information at the start and end of 10 min videos was used to calculate displacement of individual mitochondria. Individual mitochondrial displacements were averaged per cell to obtain average mitochondrial displacement within individual microglia. The volume for individual mitochondria was averaged across the initial frame and the final frame and volume of all mitochondria in a cell was summed to obtain the mitochondrial volume for each microglial cell.
Analysis of laser lesion response
Videos were preprocessed in ImageJ for background subtraction, median filter, maximum projection, and thresholding. Using an analysis strategy similar to that employed by others in the field50,51, circular ROIs were used to create three rings within images at defined times post-lesion (0, 5, 10, and 20 mins), with the first ring enclosing the lesion, the second ring at 15 μm from the first, and the third ring at 30 μm from the first. ROI rings were used as masks to extract pixels within each ring at each time point and the measure function was used to extract ring area and percent of area covered by thresholded pixels. The percent change of pixels within a ring was calculated as initial pixels minus final pixels divided by initial pixels.
Tissue dissociation and flow cytometry
2-4mo, 12-13mo, and 16-18mo WT, CX3CRCreER/+;mitoGFP and CX3CR1CreER/+;Tfamfl/fl mice were deeply anesthetized with isoflurane and transcardially perfused with 10 mL of chilled 1 M PBS. The brain was rapidly removed, cut coronally with a razor blade using anatomical landmarks and midbrain and striatum were dissected free. Samples were thoroughly minced with a razor blade on a chilled glass surface and transferred to 1.7 mL tubes containing chilled 1 mL Hibernate A Low-Fluorescence (BrainBits, Half100). Samples were then mechanically dissociated using gentle sequential trituration with fire-polished glass pipettes of decreasing diameter. Cell suspensions were pelleted via centrifugation and resuspended in 1 M PBS + Debris Removal Solution (Miltenyi, 130-109-398). Debris removal was carried out according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Following debris removal, samples were resuspended in small volumes of 1 M PBS and incubated with primary antibodies on ice for 20 min. Tetramethylrhodamine (TMRM) (Biotium, 70017) was used in some experiments to assess mitochondrial membrane potential. For these experiments, samples were incubated with TMRM 50 nM for 20 min at room temperature, prior to antibody incubation. Following incubation, samples were washed with 1xPBS and filtered through a 35μm filter (Falcon, 352235) prior to sorting. With the exception of TMRM incubation, throughout the experiment, samples were kept at 4 °C. Samples were sorted using a FACS Aria I cell sorter (BD Biosciences). The population of cells containing microglia could be readily identified based on forward scattering (FSC) and side scattering (SSC) properties. A gating strategy based on FSC and SSC width and height was used to select single cells and reduce dead cells and doublets. Microglial cells within this population were then identified and sorted based on combinations of microglial antibodies. Antibody combinations used included anti-CD45 (1:400; Biolegend, 147703), anti-P2RY12 (1:500; Biolegend, 848005), and anti-CX3CR1 (1:800; Biolegend, 149023). Microglia from CX3CR1CreER/+;mitoGFP mice were further gated from microglial antibodies to sort GFP+ cells. Placement of gates was verified using unstained samples as well as single color controls and Fluorescence Minus One (FMOs) controls. Gated Microglia were FACS sorted into 1.7 mL tubes containing 50 µl Pico Pure RNA extraction buffer and, following the sort, samples were incubated at 42 °C for 30 min, and stored in RNase-free tubes at −80 °C until further processing. Total sample processing time from brain dissection to completion of FACS purification ranged from 2-4h depending on the sort order of individual samples. Samples were collected in batches with each day of sorting including a young adult, saline injected, or TFAM+/+ control mouse. Sort order of samples from specific ages, brain regions, treatment conditions, or genotypes was interleaved to avoid introduction of bias related to tissue processing length. FACS-isolation itself was carried out at 4 °C. FACS-isolation of all samples for a given set of experiments was completed prior to downstream processing to allow simultaneous RNA isolation and cDNA preparation as described below.
Flow cytometry analyses
FCS files from sorting experiments were imported into FlowJo software for additional analyses of flow cytometry data. After placement of gates as described above, median fluorescence intensity measures were exported for populations of interest. Graphing and statistical analyses of MFI values were performed in OriginPro. To examine TMRM values normalized for mitochondrial volume/abundance, TMRM signal for each individual cell in a given sample was normalized to mitoGFP signal for that cell. Median values for this TMRM/mitoGFP measure were then calculated across all cells for a given sample. In some experiments, fluorescence signals across the entire population of cells from one sample were examined via cumulative distribution plots. For these analyses, a cumulative distribution plot was generated for each sample. Cumulative distribution curves from all samples in a group were then averaged to generate an average plot for that group.
RNA Extraction and qPCR
Total RNA was extracted from sorted cells using Pico Pure RNA isolation kit (Arcturus Bioscience) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Single strand cDNAs were synthesized using Superscript III first-strand cDNA synthesis kit (Invitrogen, 18080051), according to the manufacturer’s protocol. Samples were subjected to PreAmplification-RT-PCR. TaqMan PreAmp Master Mix Kit was used for cDNA preamplification (Cat# 4391128; Applied Biosystems, Life Technologies), using pooled primer mixes of 20x dilution of TaqMan Gene Expression Assay and 80 nM of custom-designed primer sets. cDNAs were pre-amplified in an Veriti 96-Well Fast Thermal Cycler (ThermoFisher Scientific, 4375305) using the program: 95 °C hold for 10 min, 14 cycles of 90 °C denaturation for 15 s, and 60 °C annealing and extension for 4 min. Pre-amplification PCR products were immediately diluted five times with molecular biology grade water and stored at −20 °C, or immediately processed for RT-PCR. For qPCR analysis of gene expression, single plex qPCR assays were performed on technical duplicates using TaqMan probes for each gene target or for endogenous control gene (Gapdh for LPS experiments, Gusb for MG-TFAMKO/MG-mitoGFP-TFAMKO experiments). TaqMan Advanced Fast PCR Master Mix was used (catalog #4444963; Invitrogen). To avoid amplification of any genomic DNA contamination, primers and probes that amplify across target gene exon–exon junctions were selected when possible. qPCRs reactions were run in a QuantStudio5 using the program: 95 °C hold for 20 s, followed by 40 cycles of 95 °C denaturation for 3 s, and 60 °C annealing and extension for 30 s. Calculations of relative expression and expression fold change from Ct data were conducted according to User Bulletin #2 for ABI Prism 7900 Sequence Detection System. For each target gene, the average Ct value for the endogenous control gene (Gapdh/Gusb) was subtracted from the average Ct value for the target gene, to obtain ΔCt. The relative expression was then plotted as 2-ΔΔCt. ΔΔCt was obtained by subtracting the average ΔCt of the control group from the average ΔCt of a given sample. Expression fold change was then plotted as 2-ΔΔCt. The average ΔCt of the control group was calculated separately for STR and MB samples. All TaqMan Assays and custom primers/probes that were used are detailed in Table S8.
Statistical analyses
Statistical analysis was performed in OriginPro, Matlab, and R. Heatmaps were generated in R using the ComplexHeatmap package by Gu Z et al93. PCAs were generated in R using the ggplot2 package by Wickham H94. Robust regression with False Discovery Rate control analyses were performed in R or Matlab. Cumulative distribution plots were analyzed for significant differences using Kolmogorov-Smirnov tests in OriginPro or Matlab. All graphed values are shown as mean ± SEM. Statistical details of experiments (statistical tests used, exact value of N, what N represents) can be found in results and the figure legends. In general, statistical significance was assessed using one- or two-way ANOVA. Post hoc comparisons were conducted using Student’s t-test with Bonferroni correction for multiple comparisons. Data are sufficiently normal and variance within groups is sufficiently similar for use of parametric tests. 2 tailed paired t-tests were used to compare trends across two different brain regions within individual mice. Statistical significance was considered if P < 0.05. Asterisks were used to delineate statistical significance.
Reporting summary
Further information on research design is available in the Nature Portfolio Reporting Summary linked to this article.
Data availability
Source data are provided with this paper. Source data used to prepare all figures in this study have been deposited in FigShare database (https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.30152542). Raw data files are available to researchers wishing to carry out additional analyses or validation analyses for non-commercial purposes. Access to raw data files can be obtained by contacting Dr. Lindsay De Biase, ldebiase@mednet.ucla.edu.
Code availability
Custom MatLab code used for analysis of microglial and mitochondrial motility is available on CodeOcean (https://doi.org/10.24433/CO.1668583.v1).
References
Li, Q. & Barres, B. A. Microglia and macrophages in brain homeostasis and disease. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 18, 225–242 (2018).
Sierra, A., Paolicelli, R. C. & Kettenmann, H. Cien Años de Microglía: Milestones in a century of microglial research. Trends Neurosci. 42, 778–792 (2019).
Matsudaira, T. & Prinz, M. Life and death of microglia: Mechanisms governing microglial states and fates. Immunol. Lett. 245, 51–60 (2022).
Ransohoff, R. M. A polarizing question: do M1 and M2 microglia exist?. Nat. Neurosci. 19, 987–991 (2016).
Paolicelli, R. C. et al. Microglia states and nomenclature: A field at its crossroads. Neuron 110, 3458–3483 (2022).
Grabert, K. et al. Microglial brain region−dependent diversity and selective regional sensitivities to aging. Nat. Neurosci. 19, 504–516 (2016).
Stowell, R. D. et al. Cerebellar microglia are dynamically unique and survey Purkinje neurons in vivo. Dev. Neurobiol. 78, 627–644 (2018).
Böttcher, C. et al. Human microglia regional heterogeneity and phenotypes determined by multiplexed single-cell mass cytometry. Nat. Neurosci. 22, 78–90 (2019).
De Biase, L. M. & Bonci, A. Region-specific phenotypes of microglia: The role of local regulatory cues. Neuroscientist 25, 314–333 (2019).
Ayata, P. et al. Epigenetic regulation of brain region-specific microglia clearance activity. Nat. Neurosci. 21, 1049–1060 (2018).
Hanamsagar, R. & Bilbo, S. D. Environment matters: microglia function and dysfunction in a changing world. Curr. Opin. Neurobiol. 47, 146–155 (2017).
Salter, M. W. & Stevens, B. Microglia emerge as central players in brain disease. Nat. Med. 23, 1018–1027 (2017).
Wolf, S. A., Boddeke, H. W. G. M. & Kettenmann, H. Microglia in physiology and disease. Annu. Rev. Physiol. 79, 619–643 (2017).
Gleichman, A. J. & Carmichael, S. T. Glia in neurodegeneration: Drivers of disease or along for the ride?. Neurobiol. Dis. 142, 104957 (2020).
Ceasrine, A. M. & Bilbo, S. D. Dietary fat: a potent microglial influencer. Trends Endocrinol. Metab. TEM 33, 196–205 (2022).
Sequeira, M. K. & Bolton, J. L. Stressed microglia: Neuroendocrine-neuroimmune interactions in the stress response. Endocrinology 164, bqad088 (2023).
Wangler, L. M. & Godbout, J. P. Microglia moonlighting after traumatic brain injury: aging and interferons influence chronic microglia reactivity. Trends Neurosci. 46, 926–940 (2023).
Cheray, M. & Joseph, B. Epigenetics control microglia plasticity. Front. Cell. Neurosci. 12, 243 (2018).
Shen, K. et al. Mitochondria as cellular and organismal signaling hubs. Annu. Rev. Cell Dev. Biol. 38, 179–218 (2022).
Collier, J. J., Oláhová, M., McWilliams, T. G. & Taylor, R. W. Mitochondrial signalling and homeostasis: from cell biology to neurological disease. Trends Neurosci. 46, 137–152 (2023).
Picard, M. & Shirihai, O. S. Mitochondrial signal transduction. Cell Metab. 34, 1620–1653 (2022).
Tan, J. X. & Finkel, T. Mitochondria as intracellular signaling platforms in health and disease. J. Cell Biol. 219, e202002179 (2020).
Kolliniati, O., Ieronymaki, E., Vergadi, E. & Tsatsanis, C. Metabolic regulation of macrophage activation. J. Innate Immun. 14, 51–68 (2021).
Mills, E. L. & O’Neill, L. A. Reprogramming mitochondrial metabolism in macrophages as an anti-inflammatory signal. Eur. J. Immunol. 46, 13–21 (2016).
Mills, E. L. et al. Succinate dehydrogenase supports metabolic repurposing of mitochondria to drive inflammatory macrophages. Cell 167, 457–470.e13 (2016).
Diskin, C. & Pålsson-McDermott, E. M. Metabolic modulation in macrophage effector function. Front. Immunol. 9, 270 (2018).
Ramond, E., Jamet, A., Coureuil, M. & Charbit, A. Pivotal role of mitochondria in macrophage response to bacterial pathogens. Front. Immunol. 10, 2461 (2019).
Wang, X.-L. & Li, L. Microglia regulate neuronal circuits in homeostatic and high-fat diet-induced inflammatory conditions. Front. Cell. Neurosci. 15, 722028 (2021).
Afroz, S. F. et al. Mitochondrial dynamics in macrophages: divide to conquer or unite to survive?. Biochem. Soc. Trans. 51, 41–56 (2023).
De Biase, L. M. et al. Local cues establish and maintain region-specific phenotypes of basal ganglia microglia. Neuron 95, 341–356.e6 (2017).
Maes, M. E. et al. Mitochondrial network adaptations of microglia reveal sex-specific stress response after injury and UCP2 knockout. iScience 26, 107780 (2023).
Bordt, E. A. et al. Gonadal hormones impart male-biased behavioral vulnerabilities to immune activation via microglial mitochondrial function. Brain. Behav. Immun. 115, 680–695 (2024).
Baik, S. H. et al. A breakdown in metabolic reprogramming causes microglia dysfunction in alzheimer’s disease. Cell Metab. 30, 493–507.e6 (2019).
March-Diaz, R. et al. Hypoxia compromises the mitochondrial metabolism of alzheimer’s disease microglia via HIF1. Nat. Aging 1, 385–399 (2021).
Mora-Romero, B. et al. Microglia mitochondrial complex I deficiency during development induces glial dysfunction and early lethality. Nat. Metab. 6, 1479–1491 (2024).
Peruzzotti-Jametti, L. et al. Mitochondrial complex I activity in microglia sustains neuroinflammation. Nature 628, 195–203 (2024).
Stoolman, J. S. et al. Mitochondrial respiration in microglia is essential for response to demyelinating injury but not proliferation. Nat. Metab. 6, 1492–1504 (2024).
Fairley, L. H. et al. Mitochondrial control of microglial phagocytosis by the translocator protein and hexokinase 2 in Alzheimer’s disease. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. Usa. 120, e2209177120 (2023).
Fecher, C. et al. Cell-type-specific profiling of brain mitochondria reveals functional and molecular diversity. Nat. Neurosci. 22, 1731–1742 (2019).
Agarwal, A. et al. Transient opening of the mitochondrial permeability transition pore induces microdomain calcium transients in astrocyte processes. Neuron 93, 587–605.e7 (2017).
Yona, S. et al. Fate Mapping reveals origins and dynamics of monocytes and tissue macrophages under homeostasis. Immunity 38, 79–91 (2013).
Hope, K. T., Hawes, I. A., Moca, E. N., Bonci, A. & De Biase, L. M. Maturation of the microglial population varies across mesolimbic nuclei. Eur. J. Neurosci. 52, 3689–3709 (2020).
Moca, E. N. et al. Microglia drive pockets of neuroinflammation in middle age. J. Neurosci. 42, 3896–3918 (2022).
Faust, T. E. et al. A comparative analysis of microglial inducible Cre lines. Cell Rep. 42, 113031 (2023).
Bedolla, A. M. et al. A comparative evaluation of the strengths and potential caveats of the microglial inducible CreER mouse models. Cell Rep. 43, 113660 (2024).
Madisen, L. et al. A robust and high-throughput Cre reporting and characterization system for the whole mouse brain. Nat. Neurosci. 13, 133–140 (2010).
Nimmerjahn, A., Kirchhoff, F. & Helmchen, F. Resting microglial cells are highly dynamic surveillants of brain parenchyma in vivo. Science 308, 1314–1318 (2005).
Chiurazzi, M., Di Maro, M., Cozzolino, M. & Colantuoni, A. Mitochondrial dynamics and microglia as new targets in metabolism regulation. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 21, 3450 (2020).
Etienne, F. et al. Two-photon Imaging of Microglial Processes’ Attraction Toward ATP or Serotonin in Acute Brain Slices. J. Vis. Exp. JoVE https://doi.org/10.3791/58788 (2019).
Davalos, D. et al. ATP mediates rapid microglial response to local brain injury in vivo. Nat. Neurosci. 8, 752–758 (2005).
Lou, N. et al. Purinergic receptor P2RY12-dependent microglial closure of the injured blood-brain barrier. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. Usa. 113, 1074–1079 (2016).
Bernier, L.-P. et al. Microglial metabolic flexibility supports immune surveillance of the brain parenchyma. Nat. Commun. 11, 1559 (2020).
Norden, D. M., Trojanowski, P. J., Villanueva, E., Navarro, E. & Godbout, J. P. Sequential activation of microglia and astrocyte cytokine expression precedes increased Iba-1 or GFAP immunoreactivity following systemic immune challenge. Glia 64, 300–316 (2016).
Nair, S. et al. Lipopolysaccharide-induced alteration of mitochondrial morphology induces a metabolic shift in microglia modulating the inflammatory response in vitro and in vivo. Glia 67, 1047–1061 (2019).
Park, J. et al. Mitochondrial dynamics modulate the expression of pro-inflammatory mediators in microglial cells. J. Neurochem. 127, 221–232 (2013).
Orihuela, R., McPherson, C. A. & Harry, G. J. Microglial M1/M2 polarization and metabolic states. Br. J. Pharmacol. 173, 649–665 (2016).
Hu, Y. et al. mTOR-mediated metabolic reprogramming shapes distinct microglia functions in response to lipopolysaccharide and ATP. Glia 68, 1031–1045 (2020).
O’Neill, L. A. J., Kishton, R. J. & Rathmell, J. A guide to immunometabolism for immunologists. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 16, 553–565 (2016).
Van den Bossche, J. et al. Mitochondrial dysfunction prevents repolarization of inflammatory macrophages. Cell Rep. 17, 684–696 (2016).
Hoogland, I. C. M. et al. Microglial activation after systemic stimulation with lipopolysaccharide and escherichia coli. Front. Cell. Neurosci. 12, 110 (2018).
Picard, M., Shirihai, O. S., Gentil, B. J. & Burelle, Y. Mitochondrial morphology transitions and functions: implications for retrograde signaling?. Am. J. Physiol. -Regul. Integr. Comp. Physiol. 304, R393–R406 (2013).
Chan, D. C. Mitochondrial dynamics and its involvement in disease. Annu. Rev. Pathol. 15, 235–259 (2020).
Su, É, Villard, C. & Manneville, J.-B. Mitochondria: At the crossroads between mechanobiology and cell metabolism. Biol. Cell 115, e2300010 (2023).
Candlish, M. & Hefendehl, J. K. Microglia phenotypes converge in aging and neurodegenerative disease. Front. Neurol. 12, 660720 (2021).
Brawek, B., Skok, M. & Garaschuk, O. Changing functional signatures of microglia along the axis of brain aging. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 22, 1091 (2021).
Niraula, A., Sheridan, J. F. & Godbout, J. P. Microglia priming with aging and stress. Neuropsychopharmacol. Publ. Am. Coll. Neuropsychopharmacol. 42, 318–333 (2017).
Lima, T., Li, T. Y., Mottis, A. & Auwerx, J. Pleiotropic effects of mitochondria in aging. Nat. Aging 2, 199–213 (2022).
Sun, N., Youle, R. J. & Finkel, T. The mitochondrial basis of aging. Mol. Cell 61, 654–666 (2016).
Chistiakov, D. A., Sobenin, I. A., Revin, V. V., Orekhov, A. N. & Bobryshev, Y. V. Mitochondrial aging and age-related dysfunction of mitochondria. BioMed. Res. Int. 2014, 238463 (2014).
Stillman, J. M. et al. Lipofuscin-like autofluorescence within microglia and its impact on studying microglial engulfment. Nat. Commun. 14, 7060 (2023).
Fiebig, C. et al. Mitochondrial dysfunction in astrocytes impairs the generation of reactive astrocytes and enhances neuronal cell death in the cortex upon photothrombotic lesion. Front. Mol. Neurosci. 12, 40 (2019).
Sterky, F. H., Lee, S., Wibom, R., Olson, L. & Larsson, N.-G. Impaired mitochondrial transport and Parkin-independent degeneration of respiratory chain-deficient dopamine neurons in vivo. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. Usa. 108, 12937–12942 (2011).
Vernochet, C. et al. Adipose-specific deletion of TFAM increases mitochondrial oxidation and protects mice against obesity and insulin resistance. Cell Metab. 16, 765–776 (2012).
Sörensen, L. et al. Late-onset corticohippocampal neurodepletion attributable to catastrophic failure of oxidative phosphorylation in MILON mice. J. Neurosci. J. Soc. Neurosci. 21, 8082–8090 (2001).
Larsson, N. G. et al. Mitochondrial transcription factor A is necessary for mtDNA maintenance and embryogenesis in mice. Nat. Genet. 18, 231–236 (1998).
Fornasiero, E. F. et al. Precisely measured protein lifetimes in the mouse brain reveal differences across tissues and subcellular fractions. Nat. Commun. 9, 4230 (2018).
Alshial, E. E. et al. Mitochondrial dysfunction and neurological disorders: A narrative review and treatment overview. Life Sci. 334, 122257 (2023).
Norat, P. et al. Mitochondrial dysfunction in neurological disorders: Exploring mitochondrial transplantation. NPJ Regen. Med. 5, 22 (2020).
Bame, X. & Hill, R. A. Mitochondrial network reorganization and transient expansion during oligodendrocyte generation. Nat. Commun. 15, 6979 (2024).
Zehnder, T. et al. Mitochondrial biogenesis in developing astrocytes regulates astrocyte maturation and synapse formation. Cell Rep. 35, 108952 (2021).
Ryu, K. W. et al. Cellular ATP demand creates metabolically distinct subpopulations of mitochondria. Nature 635, 746–754 (2024).
Aryaman, J., Johnston, I. G. & Jones, N. S. Mitochondrial heterogeneity. Front. Genet. 9, 718 (2018).
Seager, R., Lee, L., Henley, J. M. & Wilkinson, K. A. Mechanisms and roles of mitochondrial localisation and dynamics in neuronal function. Neuronal Signal 4, NS20200008 (2020).
Degechisa, S. T., Dabi, Y. T. & Gizaw, S. T. The mitochondrial associated endoplasmic reticulum membranes: A platform for the pathogenesis of inflammation-mediated metabolic diseases. Immun. Inflamm. Dis. 10, e647 (2022).
Pietramale, A. N., Bame, X., Doty, M. E. & Hill, R. A. Mitochondria are absent from microglial processes performing surveillance, chemotaxis, and phagocytic engulfment. BioRxiv Prepr. Serv. Biol. 2024.10.15.618505 https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.10.15.618505 (2024).
Sivagnanam, S., Mahato, P. & Das, P. An overview on the development of different optical sensing platforms for adenosine triphosphate (ATP) recognition. Org. Biomol. Chem. 21, 3942–3983 (2023).
Harrington, J. S., Ryter, S. W., Plataki, M., Price, D. R. & Choi, A. M. K. Mitochondria in health, disease, and aging. Physiol. Rev. 103, 2349–2422 (2023).
König, T. & McBride, H. M. Mitochondrial-derived vesicles in metabolism, disease, and aging. Cell Metab. 36, 21–35 (2024).
Utz, S. G. et al. Early fate defines microglia and non-parenchymal brain macrophage development. Cell 181, 557–573.e18 (2020).
Han, J., Fan, Y., Zhou, K., Blomgren, K. & Harris, R. A. Uncovering sex differences of rodent microglia. J. Neuroinflammation 18, 74 (2021).
Krishna, S. et al. Identification of long-lived proteins in the mitochondria reveals increased stability of the electron transport chain. Dev. Cell 56, 2952–2965.e9 (2021).
York, E. M., Bernier, L.-P. & MacVicar, B. A. Microglial modulation of neuronal activity in the healthy brain. Dev. Neurobiol. 78, 593–603 (2018).
Gu, Z., Eils, R. & Schlesner, M. Complex heatmaps reveal patterns and correlations in multidimensional genomic data. Bioinforma. Oxf. Engl. 32, 2847–2849 (2016).
Wickham, H. Ggplot2. (Springer International Publishing, Cham, 2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-24277-4.
Acknowledgements
This work was supported by the Diana Jacobs Kalman Scholarship (American Federation on Aging Research scholarship to A.W.S), the Jennifer S. Buchwald Graduate Fellowship (UCLA Department of Physiology fellowship to K.E.), a University of California Office of the President Pre-Professoriate Fellowship (to K.E.), UCLA CARE Summer Undergraduate Fellowship (to C.C.), UCLA CARE Summer Undergraduate Fellowship (to K.M.), David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA start-up funds (to L.M.D.) and a Stanley Fahn Junior Faculty Award (PF-SF-JFA-836586; Parkinson’s Foundation Grant to L.M.D.). We thank the UCLA Eli and Edythe Broad Center of Regenerative Medicine and Stem Cell Research Flow Cytometry Core and the UCLA Jonsson Comprehensive Cancer Center and Center for AIDS Research Flow Cytometry Core for assistance with FACS-based experiments. We thank the UCLA Eli and Edythe Broad Center of Regenerative Medicine and Stem Cell Research Microscopy Core for access to and use of confocal microscopes and Imaris workstations. We thank Dr. Elaine Hsiao for the use of the Hsiao lab QuantStudio5 for qPCR experiments. We thank Dr. Fanny Etienne for assistance with training for multiphoton imaging experiments.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
K.E., A.W.S., and L.M.D. designed research; K.E., A.W.S., A.S., A.E., K.M., M.Y., and C.C. performed research; K.E., A.W.S., D.T.G., A.S., K.M., M.Y., and C.C. analyzed data; K.E., A.W.S., and L.M.D. edited the paper; K.E. and A.W.S. wrote the first draft of the paper; K.E. and A.W.S. wrote the paper; L.M.D. supervised research.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Peer review
Peer review information
Nature Communications thanks Sandra Siegert, who co-reviewed with Margaret Maes; Adam Denes and the other, anonymous, reviewers for their contribution to the peer review of this work. A peer review file is available.
Additional information
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Espinoza, K., Schaler, A.W., Gray, D.T. et al. Dynamic changes in mitochondria support phenotypic flexibility of microglia. Nat Commun 16, 11103 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-025-66709-5
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Version of record:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-025-66709-5










