Table 1 Comparison between the proposed MOT system and the baseline in terms of tracking accuracy on benchmark sequences
From: Enhancing vehicle-mountable multiple object tracking systems with embeddable Ising machines
Benchmark | HOTA↑ | AssA↑ | DetA↑ | LocA↑ |
|---|---|---|---|---|
MOT17-02-FRCNN | 33.5 (107%) | 38.0 (113%) | 29.9 (100%) | 88.6 (100%) |
MOT17-04-FRCNN | 52.5 (105%) | 56.5 (109%) | 48.9 (100%) | 90.8 (100%) |
MOT17-05-FRCNN | 43.3 (101%) | 47.8 (101%) | 39.3 (101%) | 85.2 (100%) |
MOT17-09-FRCNN | 49.4 (112%) | 49.2 (125%) | 49.6 (101%) | 91.6 (100%) |
MOT17-10-FRCNN | 37.8 (98%) | 31.6 (96%) | 45.7 (99%) | 85.6 (100%) |
MOT17-11-FRCNN | 54.0 (109%) | 55.8 (118%) | 52.3 (100%) | 91.4 (100%) |
MOT17-13-FRCNN | 43.0 (102%) | 44.7 (104%) | 41.7 (100%) | 84.9 (100%) |
Overall (MOT17) | 46.7 (104%) | 49.6 (109%) | 44.3 (100%) | 89.1 (100%) |
Cross-DLVL | 95.8 (101%) | 96.5 (101%) | 95.3 (100%) | 94.9 (100%) |
Cross-DLVM | 91.1 (110%) | 91.4 (120%) | 90.9 (100%) | 91.0 (100%) |
Cross-DLVH | 80.8 (118%) | 81.2 (137%) | 80.6 (101%) | 84.4 (100%) |
Cross-DMVL | 96.2 (123%) | 96.9 (150%) | 95.6 (100%) | 95.4 (100%) |
Cross-DMVM | 87.2 (133%) | 84.8 (174%) | 89.7 (101%) | 91.4 (100%) |
Cross-DMVH | 72.7 (121%) | 66.5 (144%) | 79.5 (101%) | 84.7 (100%) |
Cross-DHVL | 91.0 (129%) | 87.9 (164%) | 94.2 (101%) | 95.2 (100%) |
Cross-DHVM | 84.1 (139%) | 81.1 (189%) | 87.4 (102%) | 91.3 (100%) |
Cross-DHVH | 68.1 (120%) | 61.4 (141%) | 75.6 (102%) | 84.3 (100%) |
Overall (Cross) | 85.2 (123%) | 85.8 (148%) | 86.0 (101%) | 90.6 (100%) |
Overall (MOT17+Cross) | 56.0 (111%) | 60.9 (123%) | 52.1 (101%) | 89.5 (100%) |
