Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Advertisement

Nature Communications
  • View all journals
  • Search
  • My Account Login
  • Content Explore content
  • About the journal
  • Publish with us
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed
  1. nature
  2. nature communications
  3. articles
  4. article
Sustainable water oxidation enabled by a complex-doped cobalt oxide electrode
Download PDF
Download PDF
  • Article
  • Open access
  • Published: 31 December 2025

Sustainable water oxidation enabled by a complex-doped cobalt oxide electrode

  • Hongsheng Wang  ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0001-6487-63091 na1,
  • Jia Lei1 na1,
  • Jiashun Wu2 na1,
  • Yan Shi3 na1,
  • Yunze Zhang1,
  • Miao Wang1,
  • Hao Fei1,
  • Siyuan Wang1,
  • Ziyi Wang1,
  • Ruoqi Liu1,
  • Tong Liu4,
  • Ting-Shan Chan  ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0001-5220-16115,
  • Shu-Chih Haw5,
  • Cheng-Wei Kao5,
  • Aleksandra Wanda Baron-Wiechec  ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0001-9458-66796,
  • Changfeng Yan  ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0001-7096-17613,
  • Hui Kong  ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0003-4817-97867,
  • Zhenbin Wang  ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0002-7016-92451,2,
  • Fu-rong Chen  ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0003-4707-65902 &
  • …
  • Jian Wang  ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0002-6800-04671,8 

Nature Communications , Article number:  (2025) Cite this article

  • 3192 Accesses

  • Metrics details

We are providing an unedited version of this manuscript to give early access to its findings. Before final publication, the manuscript will undergo further editing. Please note there may be errors present which affect the content, and all legal disclaimers apply.

Subjects

  • Electrocatalysis
  • Hydrogen energy

Abstract

Achieving sustainable water oxidation presents significant challenges, particularly employing cobalt-based electrocatalysts. Despite promising activities, many cobalt-based electrocatalysts undergo in-situ partial restructuring into disordered (oxy)hydroxides, as indicated by the Pourbaix diagram. This restructuring typically degrades structural integrity and electronic conductivity, undermining catalytic stability. Here, we propose a complex doping strategy to stabilize LiCoO2, a cobalt oxide that can be sourced from spent lithium-ion batteries, for sustainable water oxidation. Specifically, by co-doping LiCoO2 with Ni, Fe, and Pd, we mitigate the reconstructed extent of the in-situ generated spinel phase during water oxidation reaction and enhance electrochemical stability. Furthermore, complex doping improves the surface conductivity and facilitates gas removal, boosting mechanical robustness. Consequently, the optimized LiCo0.79Ni0.1Fe0.1Pd0.01O2 achieves a competitive water oxidation stability of over 2000 hours. Additionally, in membrane electrolyzer tests, LiCo0.79Ni0.1Fe0.1Pd0.01O2 outperforms the benchmark RuO2, delivering 2.5 A cm−2 at 1.58 V and maintaining stability for over 1400 hours. By elucidating the role of each dopant in LiCo0.79Ni0.1Fe0.1Pd0.01O2, this work offers critical insights for the rational design of sustainable water splitting electrodes.

Similar content being viewed by others

Redirecting dynamic surface restructuring of a layered transition metal oxide catalyst for superior water oxidation

Article 01 March 2021

Identifying and tuning coordinated water molecules for efficient electrocatalytic water oxidation

Article Open access 30 December 2024

Iron and oxygen vacancies co-modulated adsorption evolution and lattice oxygen dual-path mechanism for water oxidation

Article Open access 02 October 2025

Data availability

Source data are provided with this paper. Numerical data generated in this study are provided in the Source Data file. The authors declare that the main data supporting the findings of this study are available within the article and its Supplementary Information files. Additional data, including raw data files from apparatus data acquisition software, are available from the corresponding authors upon request. Source data are provided with this paper.

References

  1. Turner, J. A. Sustainable hydrogen production. Science 305, 972–974 (2004).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Pham, C. V., Escalera-López, D., Mayrhofer, K., Cherevko, S. & Thiele, S. Essentials of high performance water electrolyzers - from catalyst layer materials to electrode engineering. Adv. Energy Mater. 11, 2101998 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Grigoriev, S. A., Fateev, V. N., Bessarabov, D. G. & Millet, P. Current status, research trends, and challenges in water electrolysis science and technology. Int. J. Hydrog. Energy 45, 26036–26058 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Seh, Z. W. et al. Combining theory and experiment in electrocatalysis: insights into materials design. Science 355, eaad4998 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Huang, Z. F. et al. Chemical and structural origin of lattice oxygen oxidation in Co-Zn oxyhydroxide oxygen evolution electrocatalysts. Nat. Energy 4, 329–338 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Xu, D. et al. Earth-abundant oxygen electrocatalysts for alkaline anion-exchange-membrane water electrolysis: effects of catalyst conductivity and comparison with performance in three-electrode cells. ACS Catal. 9, 7–15 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Klingenhof, M. et al. Anion-tuned layered double hydroxide anodes for anion exchange membrane water electrolyzers: from catalyst screening to single-cell performance. Acs Energy Lett. 7, 3415–3422 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Li, Z. et al. Seed-assisted formation of NiFe anode catalysts for anion exchange membrane water electrolysis at industrial-scale current density. Nat. Catal. 7, 944–952 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Chung, D. Y. et al. Dynamic stability of active sites in hydr(oxy)oxides for the oxygen evolution reaction. Nat. Energy 5, 222–230 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Wang, J. Controlling dynamic reconstruction chemistry for superior oxygen-evolving catalysts. Chem 9, 1645–1657 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Fabbri, E. et al. Dynamic surface self-reconstruction is the key of highly active perovskite nano-electrocatalysts for water splitting. Nat. Mater. 16, 925–931 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  12. Bergmann, A. et al. Unified structural motifs of the catalytically active state of Co(oxyhydr)oxides during the electrochemical oxygen evolution reaction. Nat. Catal. 1, 711–719 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  13. Edgington, J., Schweitzer, N., Alayoglu, S. & Seitz, L. C. Constant change: exploring dynamic oxygen evolution reaction catalysis and material transformations in strontium zinc iridate perovskite in acid. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 143, 9961–9971 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  14. Wu, Y. et al. Efficient electrocatalysis of overall water splitting by ultrasmall NixCo3−xS4 coupled Ni3S2 nanosheet arrays. Nano Energy 35, 161–170 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  15. Ma, C. L. et al. Surface reconstruction for forming the [IrO(6)]-[IrO(6)] framework: key structure for stable and activated OER performance in acidic media. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 13, 29654–29663 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  16. Wilde, P. et al. Insights into the formation, chemical stability, and activity of transient NiyP@NiOx core–shell heterostructures for the oxygen evolution reaction. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. 3, 2304–2309 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  17. Liu, X. et al. Comprehensive understandings into complete reconstruction of precatalysts: synthesis, applications, and characterizations. Adv. Mater. 33, e2007344 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  18. Wang, J. et al. Redirecting dynamic surface restructuring of a layered transition metal oxide catalyst for superior water oxidation. Nat. Catal. 4, 212–222 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  19. Lu, Z. et al. Electrochemical tuning of layered lithium transition metal oxides for improvement of oxygen evolution reaction. Nat. Commun. 5, 4345 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  20. Yu, J. et al. Mechanochemical upcycling of spent LiCoO(2) to new LiNi(0.80)Co(0.15)Al(0.05)O(2) battery: an atom economy strategy. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 120, e2217698120 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  21. Zhu, Y. et al. A High-performance electrocatalyst for oxygen evolution reaction: LiCo0.8 Fe0.2 O2. Adv. Mater. 27, 7150–7155 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  22. Zheng, X. B. et al. Enriched-band holes enabling fast oxygen evolution kinetics on atomic-layered defect-rich lithium cobalt oxide nanosheets. Adv. Funct. Mater. 32, 2200663 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  23. Kim, Y. et al. Alteration of oxygen evolution mechanisms in layered LiCoO2 structures by intercalation of alkali metal ions. J. Mater. Chem. A 10, 10967–10978 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  24. Zhu, Y. et al. A high-performance electrocatalyst for oxygen evolution reaction: LiCo0.8Fe0.2O2. Adv. Mater. 27, 7150–7155 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  25. Shannon, R. D. Revised effective ionic-radii and systematic studies of interatomic distances in halides and chalcogenides. Acta Crystallogr. Sect. A 32, 751–767 (1976).

    Google Scholar 

  26. Mitra, S. & Sudakar, C. High rate capability and cyclic stability of Ni-rich layered oxide LiNi0.83Co0.12Mn0.05−xAlxO2 cathodes: nanofiber versus nanoparticle morphology. Battery Energy https://doi.org/10.1002/bte2.20230066 (2024).

  27. Lei, H. et al. Homogenization and upcycling of hetero spent LiCoO2 cathodes: rational introduction of Li/Co anti-sites toward enhanced high-voltage stability. Adv. Funct. Mater. https://doi.org/10.1002/adfm.202402325 (2024).

  28. Kong, W. et al. Adjusting the redox coupling effect via Li/Co anti-site defect for stable high-voltage LiCoO2 cathode. Adv. Funct. Mater. https://doi.org/10.1002/adfm.202211033 (2022).

  29. Patridge, C. J., Love, C. T., Swider-Lyons, K. E., Twigg, M. E. & Ramaker, D. E. In-situ X-ray absorption spectroscopy analysis of capacity fade in nanoscale-LiCoO2. J. Solid State Chem. 203, 134–144 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  30. Wu, Z. et al. Unveiling the evolution of LiCoO2 beyond 4.6 V. ACS Energy Lett. 8, 4806–4817 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  31. Huang, W. & Frech, R. Vibrational spectroscopic and electrochemical studies of the low and high temperature phases of LiCo1−x MxO2 (M = Ni or Ti). Solid State Ion. 86-88, 395–400 (1996).

    Google Scholar 

  32. Nishi, T., Nakai, H. & Kita, A. Visualization of the state-of-charge distribution in a LiCoO2Cathode by in situ Raman imaging. J. Electrochem. Soc. 160, A1785–A1788 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  33. Gao, R. et al. Probing the self-boosting catalysis of LiCoO2 in Li–O2 battery with multiple in situ/operando techniques. Adv. Funct. Mater. https://doi.org/10.1002/adfm.202002223 (2020).

  34. Hertz, J. T. et al. Magnetism and structure of LixCoO2 and comparison to NaxCoO2. Phys. Rev. B 77, 075119 (2008).

    Google Scholar 

  35. Sun, Y. et al. Navigating surface reconstruction of spinel oxides for electrochemical water oxidation. Nat. Commun. 14, 2467 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  36. Meng, Y. S. & Arroyo-de Dompablo, M. E. First principles computational materials design for energy storage materials in lithium ion batteries. Energy Environ. Sci. 2, 589–609 (2009).

    Google Scholar 

  37. Shan, X. et al. Bivalence Mn(5)O(8) with hydroxylated interphase for high-voltage aqueous sodium-ion storage. Nat. Commun. 7, 13370 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  38. Jaiswal, S. K. & Kumar, J. On the X-ray photoelectron spectra, oxygen permeability, and electrical conductivity variations in (Ba0.5Sr0.5)(ZnηFe1-η)O3-ξ (η = 0, 0.2) system. Ionics 27, 1323–1329 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  39. Wan, L., Xu, Z., Xu, Q., Wang, P. C. & Wang, B. G. Overall design of novel 3D-ordered MEA with drastically enhanced mass transport for alkaline electrolyzers. Energy Environ. Sci. 15, 1882–1892 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  40. Chatenet, M. et al. Water electrolysis: from textbook knowledge to the latest scientific strategies and industrial developments. Chem. Soc. Rev. 51, 4583–4762 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  41. Luo, S., Elouarzaki, K. & Xu, Z. J. Electrochemistry in magnetic fields. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 61, e202203564 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  42. Fang, W. et al. Origins of fast diffusion of water dimers on surfaces. Nat. Commun. 11, 1689 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  43. Ren, G., Zhou, M., Hu, P., Chen, J. F. & Wang, H. Bubble-water/catalyst triphase interface microenvironment accelerates photocatalytic OER via optimizing semi-hydrophobic OH radical. Nat. Commun. 15, 2346 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  44. Kim, M. et al. Gas-liquid interfacial plasma engineering under dilute nitric acid to improve hydrophilicity and OER performance of nickel foam. Prog. Nat. Sci.: Mater. Int. 32, 608–616 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  45. Zhu, A. et al. Rational design of precatalysts and controlled evolution of catalyst-electrolyte interface for efficient hydrogen production. Nat. Commun. 16, 1880 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  46. Harrington, D. A. & Conway, B. E. Kinetic-theory of the open-circuit potential decay method for evaluation of behavior of adsorbed intermediates - analysis for the case of the H-2 evolution reaction. J. Electroanal. Chem. 221, 1–21 (1987).

    Google Scholar 

  47. Conway, B. E. & Bourgault, P. L. Significance of e.m.f. decay measurements. Applications to the nickel oxide electrode. Trans. Faraday Soc. 58, 593–607 (1962).

    Google Scholar 

  48. Doyle, R. L., Godwin, I. J., Brandon, M. P. & Lyons, M. E. Redox and electrochemical water splitting catalytic properties of hydrated metal oxide modified electrodes. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 15, 13737–13783 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  49. Singh, A. K. et al. Electrochemical stability of metastable materials. Chem. Mater. 29, 10159–10167 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  50. Li, H. et al. Analysis of the limitations in the oxygen reduction activity of transition metal oxide surfaces. Nat. Catal. 4, 463–468 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  51. Maiyalagan, T., Jarvis, K. A., Therese, S., Ferreira, P. J. & Manthiram, A. Spinel-type lithium cobalt oxide as a bifunctional electrocatalyst for the oxygen evolution and oxygen reduction reactions. Nat. Commun. 5, 3949 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  52. Ravel, B. & Newville, M. ATHENA, ARTEMIS, HEPHAESTUS: data analysis for X-ray absorption spectroscopy using IFEFFIT. J. Synchrotron Radiat. 12, 537–541 (2005).

    Google Scholar 

  53. Funke, H., Scheinost, A. C. & Chukalina, M. Wavelet analysis of extended x-ray absorption fine structure data. Phys. Rev. B 71, 094110 (2005).

    Google Scholar 

  54. Bard, A. J. Standard Potentials in Aqueous Solution. https://doi.org/10.1201/9780203738764 (Routledge, 1985).

  55. McCrory, C. C., Jung, S., Peters, J. C. & Jaramillo, T. F. Benchmarking heterogeneous electrocatalysts for the oxygen evolution reaction. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 135, 16977–16987 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  56. Gerhardt, M. R. et al. Method—Practices and pitfalls in voltage breakdown analysis of electrochemical energy-conversion systems. J. Electrochem. Soc. https://doi.org/10.1149/1945-7111/abf061 (2021).

  57. Bratsch, S. G. Standard electrode potentials and temperature coefficients in water at 298.15 K. J. Phys. Chem. Ref. Data 18, 1–21 (1989).

    Google Scholar 

  58. Kresse, G. & Furthmuller, J. Efficient iterative schemes for ab initio total-energy calculations using a plane-wave basis set. Phys. Rev. B Condens Matter 54, 11169–11186 (1996).

    Google Scholar 

  59. Blochl, P. E. Projector augmented-wave method. Phys. Rev. B Condens Matter 50, 17953–17979 (1994).

    Google Scholar 

  60. Perdew, J. P., Burke, K. & Ernzerhof, M. Generalized gradient approximation made simple. Phys. Rev. Lett. 77, 3865–3868 (1996).

    Google Scholar 

  61. Dudarev, S. L., Botton, G. A., Savrasov, S. Y., Humphreys, C. J. & Sutton, A. P. Electron-energy-loss spectra and the structural stability of nickel oxide: an LSDA+U study. Phys. Rev. B 57, 1505–1509 (1998).

    Google Scholar 

  62. Jain, A. et al. Commentary: the materials project: a materials genome approach to accelerating materials innovation. Apl. Mater. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4812323 (2013).

  63. Monkhorst, H. J. & Pack, J. D. Special points for Brillouin-zone integrations. Phys. Rev. B 13, 5188–5192 (1976).

    Google Scholar 

  64. Su, D., Dou, S. & Wang, G. Single crystalline Co3O4 nanocrystals exposed with different crystal planes for Li-O2 batteries. Sci. Rep. 4, 5767 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  65. Van De Walle, A. Multicomponent multisublattice alloys, nonconfigurational entropy and other additions to the alloy theoretic automated toolkit. Calphad 33, 266–278 (2009).

    Google Scholar 

  66. Zheng, H. et al. Controlling self-assembled perovskite−spinel nanostructures. Nano Lett. 6, 1401–1407 (2006).

    Google Scholar 

  67. Man, I. C. et al. Universality in oxygen evolution electrocatalysis on oxide surfaces. ChemCatChem 3, 1159–1165 (2011).

    Google Scholar 

  68. Wang, Z., Guo, X., Montoya, J. & Nørskov, J. K. Predicting aqueous stability of solid with computed Pourbaix diagram using SCAN functional. npj Comput. Mater. 6, 160 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  69. Sun, J., Ruzsinszky, A. & Perdew, J. P. Strongly constrained and appropriately normed semilocal density functional. Phys. Rev. Lett. 115, 036402 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  70. Anubhav, J. et al. The Materials Project: A materials genome approach to accelerating materials innovation. APL Materials 1, 011002 (2013).

  71. Kuai, C. et al. Dissolved Fe species enable a cooperative solid–molecular mechanism for the oxygen evolution reaction on NiFe-based catalysts. Nat. Catal. 8, 523–535 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  72. Wu, D. et al. Time-resolved spectroscopy uncovers deprotonation-induced reconstruction in oxygen-evolution NiFe-based (oxy)hydroxides. Nat. Commun. 16, 726 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

J.W. acknowledge the support from the National Natural Science Foundation of China through the projects 52302312, the Research Grants Council of Hong Kong through the projects ECS 21308523 and C1003-24Y, the Innovation and Technology Commission of Hong Kong through the project ITS/130/23FP, the City University of Hong Kong through projects 9667262, 9610537, and 7005921, the Department of Science and Technology of Guangdong Province through project 2022A1515010212, 2023B1515130004, and 2024A1515013020, the Department of Science and Technology of Sichuan Province through project 2024NSFSC0275, and the joint support from the Innovation and Technology Commission of the Hong Kong SAR (Project No. GHP/290/23SZ) and the Science, Technology and Innovation Bureau of Shenzhen Municipality (Project No. SGDX20240115110505010) under the Mainland-Hong Kong Technology Cooperation Funding Scheme. Z.B.W. acknowledge the support from the City University of Hong Kong through project 9020004.

Author information

Author notes
  1. These authors contributed equally: Hongsheng Wang, Jia Lei, Jiashun Wu, Yan Shi.

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Energy and Environment, City University of Hong Kong, Kowloon, Hong Kong SAR, China

    Hongsheng Wang, Jia Lei, Yunze Zhang, Miao Wang, Hao Fei, Siyuan Wang, Ziyi Wang, Ruoqi Liu, Zhenbin Wang & Jian Wang

  2. Department of Materials Science and Engineering, City University of Hong Kong, Kowloon, Hong Kong SAR, China

    Jiashun Wu, Zhenbin Wang & Fu-rong Chen

  3. Guangzhou Institute of Energy Conversion, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Guangzhou, China

    Yan Shi & Changfeng Yan

  4. State Key Laboratory of Rare Earth Resource Utilization, Changchun Institute of Applied Chemistry, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Changchun, China

    Tong Liu

  5. National Synchrotron Radiation Research Center, Hsinchu, Taiwan

    Ting-Shan Chan, Shu-Chih Haw & Cheng-Wei Kao

  6. Guangdong Technion - Israel Institute of Technology, Shantou, Guangdong, China

    Aleksandra Wanda Baron-Wiechec

  7. School of Mechanical Engineering, Beijing Institute of Technology, Beijing, China

    Hui Kong

  8. City University of Hong Kong, Shenzhen Research Institute, Shenzhen, China

    Jian Wang

Authors
  1. Hongsheng Wang
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Jia Lei
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Jiashun Wu
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Yan Shi
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Yunze Zhang
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Miao Wang
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Hao Fei
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Siyuan Wang
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Ziyi Wang
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  10. Ruoqi Liu
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  11. Tong Liu
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  12. Ting-Shan Chan
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  13. Shu-Chih Haw
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  14. Cheng-Wei Kao
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  15. Aleksandra Wanda Baron-Wiechec
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  16. Changfeng Yan
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  17. Hui Kong
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  18. Zhenbin Wang
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  19. Fu-rong Chen
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  20. Jian Wang
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

Hongsheng Wang, Jia Lei, Jiashun Wu, and Yan Shi contributed equally to this work. H.S.W. and J.L. carried out the experiment, processed the experimental data, performed the analysis, drafted the manuscript, and designed the figures. Y.S., H.K., and C.F.Y. conducted the electrolyzer stability test. Y.Z.Z., M.W., H.F., S.Y.W., Z.Y.W., R.Q.L., and T.L. contributed to data analysis. T.S.C., S.C.H., and C.W.K. contributed to the XAFS and sXAS experiments. J.S.W., Z.B.W. contributed to theoretical calculations and analysis. A.W.B.W. and F.R.C. supported the STEM analysis. J.W. conceived the idea, supervised the project, analyzed the data, and revised the manuscript. All authors reviewed and commented on the manuscript before publication.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Changfeng Yan, Hui Kong, Zhenbin Wang or Jian Wang.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Peer review

Peer review information

Nature Communications thanks the anonymous reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work. A peer review file is available.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Information

Description of Additional Supplementary Files

Supplementary Data 1

Transparent Peer Review file

Source data

Source Data

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if you modified the licensed material. You do not have permission under this licence to share adapted material derived from this article or parts of it. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wang, H., Lei, J., Wu, J. et al. Sustainable water oxidation enabled by a complex-doped cobalt oxide electrode. Nat Commun (2025). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-025-68064-x

Download citation

  • Received: 09 May 2025

  • Accepted: 17 December 2025

  • Published: 31 December 2025

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-025-68064-x

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

Download PDF

Advertisement

Explore content

  • Research articles
  • Reviews & Analysis
  • News & Comment
  • Videos
  • Collections
  • Subjects
  • Follow us on Facebook
  • Follow us on Twitter
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed

About the journal

  • Aims & Scope
  • Editors
  • Journal Information
  • Open Access Fees and Funding
  • Calls for Papers
  • Editorial Values Statement
  • Journal Metrics
  • Editors' Highlights
  • Contact
  • Editorial policies
  • Top Articles

Publish with us

  • For authors
  • For Reviewers
  • Language editing services
  • Open access funding
  • Submit manuscript

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

  • Explore articles by subject
  • Find a job
  • Guide to authors
  • Editorial policies

Nature Communications (Nat Commun)

ISSN 2041-1723 (online)

nature.com sitemap

About Nature Portfolio

  • About us
  • Press releases
  • Press office
  • Contact us

Discover content

  • Journals A-Z
  • Articles by subject
  • protocols.io
  • Nature Index

Publishing policies

  • Nature portfolio policies
  • Open access

Author & Researcher services

  • Reprints & permissions
  • Research data
  • Language editing
  • Scientific editing
  • Nature Masterclasses
  • Research Solutions

Libraries & institutions

  • Librarian service & tools
  • Librarian portal
  • Open research
  • Recommend to library

Advertising & partnerships

  • Advertising
  • Partnerships & Services
  • Media kits
  • Branded content

Professional development

  • Nature Awards
  • Nature Careers
  • Nature Conferences

Regional websites

  • Nature Africa
  • Nature China
  • Nature India
  • Nature Japan
  • Nature Middle East
  • Privacy Policy
  • Use of cookies
  • Legal notice
  • Accessibility statement
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Your US state privacy rights
Springer Nature

© 2026 Springer Nature Limited

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing