Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Advertisement

Nature Communications
  • View all journals
  • Search
  • My Account Login
  • Content Explore content
  • About the journal
  • Publish with us
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed
  1. nature
  2. nature communications
  3. articles
  4. article
Substantially lower estimates in China’s offshore wind potential using farm-scale spatial modeling and wake effects
Download PDF
Download PDF
  • Article
  • Open access
  • Published: 26 January 2026

Substantially lower estimates in China’s offshore wind potential using farm-scale spatial modeling and wake effects

  • Shiwei Xu1,2,
  • Gege Yin1,2,
  • Peiyu Hu1,2,
  • Di Dong3,
  • Yue Qin  ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0003-1664-45164,
  • Yu Liu  ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0002-0016-29022,
  • Gang Liu  ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0002-7613-19853,
  • Lili Song5 &
  • …
  • Chuan Zhang  ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0001-8541-60291,2,6 

Nature Communications , Article number:  (2026) Cite this article

  • 1158 Accesses

  • 2 Altmetric

  • Metrics details

We are providing an unedited version of this manuscript to give early access to its findings. Before final publication, the manuscript will undergo further editing. Please note there may be errors present which affect the content, and all legal disclaimers apply.

Subjects

  • Climate change
  • Energy infrastructure
  • Wind energy

Abstract

Renewable energy is critical for addressing global climate change, and accurate assessments of its potential are key for decision making and planning. This study provides a detailed, farm-level evaluation of offshore wind power potential in China, incorporating realistic turbine layouts derived from remote sensing data, wake loss modeling, and future climate scenarios. Our findings show that accounting for the farm-level details results in a China’s offshore wind potential of 2.5–4.2 PWh yr−1 which is significantly lower than previous estimates, which often exceeded 5.6 PWh yr−1. Through modeling the wake loss effects within wind farms, the study reveals that wake losses are higher than previously assumed in earlier research. Additionally, the study highlights substantial economic and technical disparities between nearshore bottom-fixed and deep-water floating wind farms, with the latter offering higher potential density but at greater costs. Our results provide a more realistic foundation for setting energy targets, optimizing regional strategies, and promoting floating wind technologies to harness deep-water resources, thereby supporting China’s transition to a sustainable energy future.

Similar content being viewed by others

Accelerating deployment of offshore wind energy alter wind climate and reduce future power generation potentials

Article Open access 03 June 2021

High-resolution gridded dataset of China’s offshore wind potential and costs under technical change

Article Open access 14 January 2025

Transforming offshore wind farms into synergistic aggregators to enhance renewable integration and grid flexibility—an Eastern China example

Article Open access 08 December 2025

Data availability

The main data supporting the findings of this study are available within the paper and Supporting Information; other data can be requested from the author upon request. Furthermore, datasets are openly accessible via the online repository at https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.29625785. Source data is available as a Source Data file. Source data are provided with this paper.

Code availability

The full set of code employed for data processing, quantitative analysis, and figure generation in this study is publicly available in the online repository at https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.29625785. The repository also includes example datasets and comprehensive documentation detailing the structure and usage of the code.

References

  1. Calvin, K. et al. IPCC, 2023: Climate Change 2023: Synthesis Report. Contribution of Working Groups I, II and III to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change [Core Writing Team, H. Lee and J. Romero (Eds.)]. https://www.ipcc.ch/report/ar6/syr/ (IPCC, Geneva, Switzerland, 2023).

  2. Global renewables outlook: energy transformation 2050. (International Renewable Energy Agency, Abu Dhabi, 2020).

  3. GWEC. Global wind report 2021. https://gwec.net/global-wind-report-2021/ (2021).

  4. NDRC. The first deep-sea floating wind turbine platform ‘Haiyang Guanlan’ sets sail. https://www.ndrc.gov.cn/fggz/jjyxtj/202303/t20230330_1366149.html (2023).

  5. Kim, T., Park, J.-I. & Maeng, J. Offshore wind farm site selection study around Jeju Island, South Korea. Renew. Energy 94, 619–628 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Hong, L. & Möller, B. Offshore wind energy potential in China: Under technical, spatial and economic constraints. Energy 36, 4482–4491 (2011).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Assessment of wind and wave energy in the China Seas under climate change based on the CMIP6 climate model. Energy 310, 133207 (2024).

  8. Sherman, P., Chen, X. & McElroy, M. Offshore wind: An opportunity for cost-competitive decarbonization of China’s energy economy. Sci. Adv. 6, eaax9571 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Deng, X. et al. Offshore wind power in China: a potential solution to electricity transformation and carbon neutrality. Fundam. Res. S266732582200440X https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fmre.2022.11.008 (2022).

  10. Rinne, E., Holttinen, H., Kiviluoma, J. & Rissanen, S. Effects of turbine technology and land use on wind power resource potential. Nat. Energy 3, 494–500 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Eurek, K. et al. An improved global wind resource estimate for integrated assessment models. Energy Econ 64, 552–567 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  12. Zhang, S. & Li, X. Future projections of offshore wind energy resources in China using CMIP6 simulations and a deep learning-based downscaling method. Energy 217, 119321 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  13. Costoya, X., deCastro, M., Carvalho, D., Feng, Z. & Gómez-Gesteira, M. Climate change impacts on the future offshore wind energy resource in China. Renew. Energy 175, 731–747 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  14. Liu, L. et al. Climate change impacts on planned supply–demand match in global wind and solar energy systems. Nat. Energy 8, 870–880 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  15. Lundquist, J. K., DuVivier, K. K., Kaffine, D. & Tomaszewski, J. M. Costs and consequences of wind turbine wake effects arising from uncoordinated wind energy development. Nat. Energy 4, 26–34 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  16. Jung, C. & Schindler, D. Wind speed distribution selection – a review of recent development and progress. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 114, 109290 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  17. Davidson, M. R., Zhang, D., Xiong, W., Zhang, X. & Karplus, V. J. Modelling the potential for wind energy integration on China’s coal-heavy electricity grid. Nat. Energy 1, 1–7 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  18. Guo, X. et al. Grid integration feasibility and investment planning of offshore wind power under carbon-neutral transition in China. Nat. Commun. 14, 2447 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  19. He, G. & Kammen, D. M. Where, when and how much wind is available? A provincial-scale wind resource assessment for China. Energy Policy 74, 116–122 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  20. Georgiou, A., Polatidis, H. & Haralambopoulos, D. Wind energy resource assessment and development: decision analysis for site evaluation and application. energy sources part recovery util. Environ. Eff. 34, 1759–1767 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  21. Li, Y., Huang, X., Tee, K. F., Li, Q. & Wu, X.-P. Comparative study of onshore and offshore wind characteristics and wind energy potentials: a case study for the southeast coastal region of China. Sustain. Energy Technol. Assess. 39, 100711 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  22. Lopez, A. et al. Impact of siting ordinances on land availability for wind and solar development. Nat. Energy 8, 1034–1043 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  23. Wang, Y., Chao, Q., Zhao, L. & Chang, R. Assessment of wind and photovoltaic power potential in China. Carbon Neutrality 1, 15 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  24. IRENA. Renewable power generation costs in 2022. (2023).

  25. Xu, Z., Han, Y., Tam, C.-Y., Yang, Z.-L. & Fu, C. Bias-corrected CMIP6 global dataset for dynamical downscaling of the historical and future climate (1979–2100). Sci. Data 8, 293 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  26. Global Modeling and Assimilation Office (GMAO), MERRA-2 inst3_3d_asm_Np: 3d,3-Hourly, Instantaneous, Pressure-Level, Assimilation, Assimilated Meteorological Fields V5.12.4, Greenbelt, MD, USA, Goddard Earth Sciences Data and Information Services Center (GES DISC), Accessed: [15 July 2024], https://doi.org/10.5067/QBZ6MG944HW0 (2015).

  27. Gil-García, I. C., Ramos-Escudero, A., García-Cascales, M. S., Dagher, H. & Molina-García, A. Fuzzy GIS-based MCDM solution for the optimal offshore wind site selection: the Gulf of Maine case. Renew. Energy 183, 130–147 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  28. Gil-García, I. C., Ramos-Escudero, A., Molina-García, Á & Fernández-Guillamón, A. GIS-based MCDM dual optimization approach for territorial-scale offshore wind power plants. J. Clean. Prod. 428, 139484 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  29. Pryor, S. C., Barthelmie, R. J. & Shepherd, T. J. Wind power production from very large offshore wind farms. Joule 5, 2663–2686 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  30. Bastankhah, M. & Porté-Agel, F. Experimental and theoretical study of wind turbine wakes in yawed conditions. J. Fluid Mech. 806, 506–541 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  31. Niayifar, A. & Porté-Agel, F. Analytical modeling of wind farms: a new approach for power prediction. Energies 9, 741 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  32. NREL. FLORIS: Controls-oriented engineering wake model. https://github.com/NREL/floris (2023).

  33. Jensen, N. A note on wind generator interaction. in (1983).

  34. Bastankhah, M., Welch, B. L., Martínez-Tossas, L. A., King, J. & Fleming, P. Analytical solution for the cumulative wake of wind turbines in wind farms. J. Fluid Mech. 911, A53 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  35. Dupont, E., Koppelaar, R. & Jeanmart, H. Global available wind energy with physical and energy return on investment constraints. Appl. Energy 209, 322–338 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  36. Klingler, M., Ameli, N., Rickman, J. & Schmidt, J. Large-scale green grabbing for wind and solar photovoltaic development in Brazil. Nat. Sustain. 7, 747–757 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  37. Kenis, M., Lanzilao, L., Bruninx, K., Meyers, J. & Delarue, E. Trading rights to consume wind in the presence of farm-farm interactions. Joule 7, 1394–1398 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  38. Balaji, R. K. & You, F. Sailing towards sustainability: offshore wind’s green hydrogen potential for decarbonization in coastal USA. Energy Environ. Sci. https://doi.org/10.1039/D4EE01460J (2024).

  39. Stehly, T., Duffy, P. & Hernando, D. M. 2022 Cost of wind energy review. https://doi.org/10.2172/2278805 (2023).

  40. The State Council of the People’s Republic of China. Outline for the construction of a rule of law government (2015–2020). https://www.gov.cn/zhengce/zhengceku/2019-09/29/content_5434626.htm (2019).

  41. Harrison-Atlas, D., Glaws, A., King, R. N. & Lantz, E. Artificial intelligence-aided wind plant optimization for nationwide evaluation of land use and economic benefits of wake steering. Nat. Energy 9, 735–749 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  42. Howland, M. F. et al. Collective wind farm operation based on a predictive model increases utility-scale energy production. Nat. Energy 7, 818–827 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  43. Veers, P. et al. Grand challenges in the science of wind energy. Science 366, eaau2027 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  44. Myhr, A., Bjerkseter, C., Ågotnes, A. & Nygaard, T. A. Levelised cost of energy for offshore floating wind turbines in a life cycle perspective. Renew. Energy 66, 714–728 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  45. Hall, R., Topham, E. & João, E. Environmental Impact Assessment for the decommissioning of offshore wind farms. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 165, 112580 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  46. Wu, Y., Zhang, J., Yuan, J., Geng, S. & Zhang, H. Study of decision framework of offshore wind power station site selection based on ELECTRE-III under intuitionistic fuzzy environment: a case of China. Energy Convers. Manag. 113, 66–81 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  47. Hall, R., João, E. & Knapp, C. W. Environmental impacts of decommissioning: Onshore versus offshore wind farms. Environ. Impact Assess. Rev. 83, 106404 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  48. Feng, J. & Shen, W. Z. Solving the wind farm layout optimization problem using a random search algorithm. Renew. Energy 78, 182–192 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  49. Chen, K., Song, M. X., Zhang, X. & Wang, S. F. Wind turbine layout optimization with multiple hub height wind turbines using greedy algorithm. Renew. Energy 96, 676–686 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  50. Galparsoro, I. et al. Reviewing the ecological impacts of offshore wind farms. Npj Ocean Sustain. 1, 1–8 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  51. Jung, C. & Schindler, D. Efficiency and effectiveness of global onshore wind energy utilization. Energy Convers. Manag. 280, 116788 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  52. Gallaher, A., Graziano, M., Axon, S. & Bertana, A. Breaking wind: A comparison between U.S. and European approaches in offshore wind energy leadership in the North Atlantic region. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 187, 113766 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  53. Rentier, G., Lelieveldt, H. & Kramer, G. J. Institutional constellations and policy instruments for offshore wind power around the North sea. Energy Policy 173, 113344 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  54. Johansen, K. Blowing in the wind: a brief history of wind energy and wind power technologies in Denmark. Energy Policy 152, 112139 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  55. von Krauland, A.-K., Long, Q., Enevoldsen, P. & Jacobson, M. Z. United States offshore wind energy atlas: availability, potential, and economic insights based on wind speeds at different altitudes and thresholds and policy-informed exclusions. Energy Convers. Manag. X 20, 100410 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  56. Wada, R. et al. Floating Offshore Wind in Japan: Addressing the Challenges, Efforts, and Research gaps. Wind Energ. Sci. Discuss. 2025, 1–58 (2025).

  57. Ren, Z., Verma, A. S., Li, Y., Teuwen, J. J. E. & Jiang, Z. Offshore wind turbine operations and maintenance: a state-of-the-art review. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 144, 110886 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  58. Wang, Y. et al. Accelerating the energy transition towards photovoltaic and wind in China. Nature 619, 761–767 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  59. Beiter, P., Mai, T., Mowers, M. & Bistline, J. Expanded modelling scenarios to understand the role of offshore wind in decarbonizing the United States. Nat. Energy 8, 1240–1249 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  60. Aziz, M. J. et al. A co-design framework for wind energy integrated with storage. Joule 6, 1995–2015 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  61. Snyder, B. F. A renewably powered Global South requires meeting interconnected cost and land-use challenges. One Earth 3, 677–679 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  62. Shaner, M. R., Davis, S. J., Lewis, N. S. & Caldeira, K. Geophysical constraints on the reliability of solar and wind power in the United States. Energy Environ. Sci. 11, 914–925 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  63. Yang, J. et al. The life-cycle energy and environmental emissions of a typical offshore wind farm in China. J. Clean. Prod. 180, 316–324 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  64. Zhang, T., Tian, B., Sengupta, D., Zhang, L. & Si, Y. Global offshore wind turbine dataset. Sci. Data 8, 191 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  65. 4C offshore. Offshore wind farms interactive map. 4C offshore https://map.4coffshore.com/offshorewind/ (2023).

  66. Hoeser, T., Feuerstein, S. & Kuenzer, C. DeepOWT: a global offshore wind turbine data set derived with deep learning from Sentinel-1 data. Earth Syst. Sci. Data 14, 4251–4270 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  67. Counihan, J. Adiabatic atmospheric boundary layers: a review and analysis of data from the period 1880–1972. Atmos. Environ. 9, 871–905 (1975).

    Google Scholar 

  68. Feng, J., Feng, L., Wang, J. & King, C. W. Evaluation of the onshore wind energy potential in mainland China—Based on GIS modeling and EROI analysis. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 152, 104484 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  69. Eikrem, K. S., Lorentzen, R. J., Faria, R., Stordal, A. S. & Godard, A. Offshore wind farm layout optimization using ensemble methods. Renew. Energy 216, 119061 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  70. Department of Wind Energy, Technical University of Denmark (DTU). WASP version 12.7 (2022).

  71. Stull, R. Practical meteorology: an algebra-based survey of atmospheric science. (University of British Columbia, 2016).

  72. EMD International A/S. WindPRO version 3.2. Available at: https://www.emd-international.com/windpro/, Accessed: [12 May 2024] (2022).

  73. Bastankhah, M. & Porté-Agel, F. A new analytical model for wind-turbine wakes. Renew. Energy 70, 116–123 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  74. Short, W., Packey, D. J. & Holt, T. A Manual for the economic evaluation of energy efficiency and renewable energy technologies. NREL/TP--462-5173, 35391 http://www.osti.gov/servlets/purl/35391-NqycFd/webviewable/ (1995).

  75. Lou, J., Yu, S., Cui, R. Y., Miller, A. & Hultman, N. A provincial analysis of wind and solar investment needs towards China’s carbon neutrality. Appl. Energy 378, 124841 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  76. Bruck, M., Sandborn, P. & Goudarzi, N. A Levelized Cost of Energy (LCOE) model for wind farms that include Power Purchase Agreements (PPAs). Renew. Energy 122, 131–139 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  77. Alsubal, S. et al. Life cycle cost assessment of offshore wind farm: Kudat, Malaysia case. Sustainability 13, 7943 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  78. Jiang, Q., Li, B. & Liu, T. Tech-economic assessment of power transmission options for large-scale offshore wind farms in China. Processes 10, 979 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  79. National Bureau of Statistics of China. China Statistical Yearbook 2022. China Statistical Yearbook 2022 https://www.stats.gov.cn/sj/ndsj/2022/indexch.htm (2022).

Download references

Acknowledgments

This research was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (72571005, 72334001) (C.Z., G.L.), the National Key R&D Program of China (2023YFF0613900) (C.Z.), China Meteorological Administration Climate Change Thematic Research (QBZ202409) (L.L.S., C.Z.), and High-performance Computing Platform of Peking University (C.Z.).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Institute of Energy, Peking University, Beijing, China

    Shiwei Xu, Gege Yin, Peiyu Hu & Chuan Zhang

  2. School of Earth and Space Sciences, Peking University, Beijing, China

    Shiwei Xu, Gege Yin, Peiyu Hu, Yu Liu & Chuan Zhang

  3. College of Urban and Environmental Sciences, Peking University, Beijing, China

    Di Dong & Gang Liu

  4. College of Environmental Science and Engineering, Peking University, Beijing, China

    Yue Qin

  5. Chinese Academy of Meteorological Sciences, Beijing, China

    Lili Song

  6. Institute of Carbon Neutrality, Peking University, Beijing, China

    Chuan Zhang

Authors
  1. Shiwei Xu
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Gege Yin
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Peiyu Hu
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Di Dong
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Yue Qin
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Yu Liu
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Gang Liu
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Lili Song
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Chuan Zhang
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

Conceptualization, S.X. and C.Z.; investigation, S.X. and C.Z.; formal analysis, S.X. and C.Z.; supervision, S.X., G.Y., P.H., Y.Q., and C.Z.; writing—original draft, S.X. and C.Z.; writing—review and editing, S.X., G.Y., Y.H., D.D., Y.Q., Y.L., G.L., L.L.S., and C.Z.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Chuan Zhang.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Peer review

Peer review information

Nature Communications thanks Nagababu Garlapati, Isabel C. Gil-Garcia, Amy Robertson, who co-reviewed with Daniel Mulas Hernando, and the other anonymous reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work. A peer review file is available.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Information

Transparent Peer Review file

Source data

Source Data

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Xu, S., Yin, G., Hu, P. et al. Substantially lower estimates in China’s offshore wind potential using farm-scale spatial modeling and wake effects. Nat Commun (2026). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-026-68655-2

Download citation

  • Received: 09 February 2025

  • Accepted: 09 January 2026

  • Published: 26 January 2026

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-026-68655-2

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

Download PDF

Advertisement

Explore content

  • Research articles
  • Reviews & Analysis
  • News & Comment
  • Videos
  • Collections
  • Subjects
  • Follow us on Facebook
  • Follow us on Twitter
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed

About the journal

  • Aims & Scope
  • Editors
  • Journal Information
  • Open Access Fees and Funding
  • Calls for Papers
  • Editorial Values Statement
  • Journal Metrics
  • Editors' Highlights
  • Contact
  • Editorial policies
  • Top Articles

Publish with us

  • For authors
  • For Reviewers
  • Language editing services
  • Open access funding
  • Submit manuscript

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

  • Explore articles by subject
  • Find a job
  • Guide to authors
  • Editorial policies

Nature Communications (Nat Commun)

ISSN 2041-1723 (online)

nature.com sitemap

About Nature Portfolio

  • About us
  • Press releases
  • Press office
  • Contact us

Discover content

  • Journals A-Z
  • Articles by subject
  • protocols.io
  • Nature Index

Publishing policies

  • Nature portfolio policies
  • Open access

Author & Researcher services

  • Reprints & permissions
  • Research data
  • Language editing
  • Scientific editing
  • Nature Masterclasses
  • Research Solutions

Libraries & institutions

  • Librarian service & tools
  • Librarian portal
  • Open research
  • Recommend to library

Advertising & partnerships

  • Advertising
  • Partnerships & Services
  • Media kits
  • Branded content

Professional development

  • Nature Awards
  • Nature Careers
  • Nature Conferences

Regional websites

  • Nature Africa
  • Nature China
  • Nature India
  • Nature Japan
  • Nature Middle East
  • Privacy Policy
  • Use of cookies
  • Legal notice
  • Accessibility statement
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Your US state privacy rights
Springer Nature

© 2026 Springer Nature Limited

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing