Table 3 Enantiomeric compositions, expressed as l-enantiomeric excess (%eel), of selected amino acids detected in the water unhydrolyzed (UNH) extracts of the CI carbonaceous chondrite Orgueil, compared with amino acids measured in both unhydrolyzed and combined unhydrolyzed + hydrolyzed (HYD) Orgueil extracts50,51

From: Abiotic sugar enantiomers in the CI carbonaceous chondrite Orgueil

Amino acid

Orgueil this study

Orgueil previous studies50,51

UNHa

UNHb

UNHc

UNH + HYDc,d

Alanine

9.97 ± 0.52

8.46 ± 0.65

18.6 ± 16.8

10.0 ± 14.0c

Serine

79.64 ± 0.40

85.21 ± 0.89

71.4 ± 8.3

<LOQ

Aspartic acid

11.16 ± 0.31

9.34 ± 0.38

50.6 ± 28.0

0.0 ± 38.0c

2-ABA

0.08 ± 0.32

−0.33 ± 0.34

n.s.

n.s.

3-AIB

0.29 ± 0.24

0.29 ± 0.25

n.q.

n.q.

3-ABA

−2.69 ± 0.71

−2.76 ± 0.71

2.9 ± 17.7

−7.7 ± 33.5c

Valine

68.06 ± 2.36

59.79 ± 2.75

n.d

43.3 ± 10.8 d

Isovaline

2.13 ± 1.60

2.13 ± 1.60

0.0 ± 7.1

15.1 ± 5.3 d

Norvaline

1.77 ± 1.45

1.59 ± 1.49

n.s.

3.7 ± 5.1 d

  1. Unhydrolyzed treatment (UNH) refers to the extraction of amino acids using either successive cold and hot water (100 °C) extractions or hot water (100 °C) alone. In contrast, hydrolyzed treatment (HYD) involves extraction via HCl acid hydrolysis.
  2. n.s.: Not separated. <LOQ: Both enantiomers were detected but remained below quantification limits. n.q.: Detected but not quantified due to chromatographic interference with other target analytes.
  3. a l-enantiomeric excess (%eel) was calculated as %eel = [(Al-Ad)/(Al+Ad) × 100], where Al and Ad correspond to the ion peak areas for l- and d-enantiomers, respectively, obtained from single ion chromatograms at a specific m/z. Values represent the average ± standard deviation of n replicate injections: n = 9 except isovaline (n = 6). Negative %eel values indicate d-excesses.
  4. b Values represent the average ± standard deviation of 9 replicate injections corrected for procedural blank.
  5. c %eel values determined as %eel = [(Cl-Cd)/(Cl+Cd) × 100], where Cl and Cd correspond to the concentrations of the enantiomers reported by Burton et al.50. Associated standard errors reported were propagated through first-order Taylor expansion approximation.
  6. d Data for the %eel correspond to the free (unhydrolyzed) plus bound (acid hydrolyzed) abundances reported by Glavin and Dworkin51.