Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Advertisement

Nature Communications
  • View all journals
  • Search
  • My Account Login
  • Content Explore content
  • About the journal
  • Publish with us
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed
  1. nature
  2. nature communications
  3. articles
  4. article
Asymmetrical covalent organic framework mixed matrix membranes for highly efficient gas separation
Download PDF
Download PDF
  • Article
  • Open access
  • Published: 22 January 2026

Asymmetrical covalent organic framework mixed matrix membranes for highly efficient gas separation

  • Li-Hua Qi1,
  • Zheng Wang  ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0002-0265-75461,2,
  • Tong-He Zhang1,
  • Zhongmin Feng1,
  • Ling Huang1,
  • Shengping Wang1,3 &
  • …
  • Huanting Wang  ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0002-9887-55554 

Nature Communications , Article number:  (2026) Cite this article

  • 1509 Accesses

  • Metrics details

We are providing an unedited version of this manuscript to give early access to its findings. Before final publication, the manuscript will undergo further editing. Please note there may be errors present which affect the content, and all legal disclaimers apply.

Subjects

  • Organic molecules in materials science
  • Polymers

Abstract

The asymmetrical and seamless Covalent organic framework (COF)-mixed matrix membranes (COF-MMMs) extending over the centimeter scale for highly efficient H2/CO2 separation are fabricated via a non-solvent induced phase separation (NIPS)-triggered in situ interfacial polymerization (IP) strategy. Here, a dense and ultrathin COF membrane (15–30 nm thick) is fabricated on the surface of the Polyether sulfone (PES) skin layer, and isolated COF nanocrystals (4–8 nm) are formed and highly dispersed inside the PES matrix through in situ interfacial polymerization. No interfacial defects are detected between the COF nanocrystals and the PES matrix. The COF-MMMs exhibit H2/CO2 selectivity of 88.8 ± 2.46 at an ambient temperature of 298 K, while maintaining a high H2 permeance of 2738 ± 58.02 GPU. This study proposes a facile strategy to fabricate large-scale high-performance COF-MMMs for gas separation.

Similar content being viewed by others

Metal–organic frameworks and covalent organic frameworks as disruptive membrane materials for energy-efficient gas separation

Article 22 August 2022

Reverse filling approach to mixed matrix covalent organic framework membranes for gas separation

Article Open access 16 April 2025

Mixed matrix membrane of poly(4-methyl-1-pentyne) and ZIF-8 for enhanced CO2 separation over H2 and CH4

Article Open access 25 April 2025

Data availability

All data are available in the main text or the Supplementary Information. Source data are provided with this paper.

References

  1. Cote, A. P. et al. Porous, crystalline, covalent organic frameworks. Science 310, 1166–1170 (2005).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Rodríguez-San-Miguel, D., Montoro, C. & Zamora, F. Covalent organic framework nanosheets: preparation, properties and applications. Chem. Soc. Rev. 49, 2291–2302 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Yuan, S. et al. Covalent organic frameworks for membrane separation. Chem. Soc. Rev. 48, 2665–2681 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Song, Q. et al. Porous organic cage thin films and molecular-sieving membranes. Adv. Mater. 28, 2629–2637 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Shen, J., Liu, G., Han, Y. & Jin, W. Artificial channels for confined mass transport at the sub-nanometre scale. Nat. Rev. Mater. 6, 294–312 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Qian, Q. et al. MOF-based membranes for gas separations. Chem. Rev. 120, 8161–8266 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Jin, Y., Hu, Y., Ortiz, M., Huang, S. & Zhang, W. Confined growth of ordered organic frameworks at an interface. Chem. Soc. Rev. 49, 4637–4666 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Wang, H. et al. Aqueous two-phase interfacial assembly of COF membranes for water desalination. Nano-Micro Lett. 14, 216 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Ying, Y., Peh, S. B., Yang, H., Yang, Z. & Zhao, D. Ultrathin covalent organic framework membranes via a multi-interfacial engineering strategy for gas separation. Adv. Mater. 34, 2104946 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Guo, Z. et al. Missing-linker defects in covalent organic framework membranes for efficient CO2 separation. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 61, e202210466 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Guo, Z. et al. Reverse filling approach to mixed matrix covalent organic framework membranes for gas separation. Nat. Commun. 16, 3617 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  12. Oh, N. Y., Min, H. J., Kim, Y. J., Maboudian, R. & Kim, J. H. Mixed-matrix, thin-film composite membranes with covalently-bonded covalent organic framework for enhanced gas separation. J. Membr. Sci. 720, 123791 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  13. Wang, S. et al. Recent advances in developing mixed matrix membranes based on covalent organic frameworks. Sep. Purif. Technol. 301, 122004 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  14. Niu, Z. et al. Mixed matrix membranes for gas separations: a review. Chem. Eng. J. 494, 152912 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  15. Zou, C. et al. Mechanical synthesis of COF nanosheet cluster and its mixed matrix membrane for efficient CO2 removal. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces. 9, 29093–29100 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  16. Knebel, A. A. & Caro, J. Metal-organic frameworks and covalent organic frameworks as disruptive membrane materials for energy-efficient gas separation. Nat. Nanotechnol. 17, 911–923 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  17. Chen, G. et al. Solid-solvent processing of ultrathin, highly loaded mixed-matrix membrane for gas separation. Science 381, 1350–1356 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  18. Zhang, Y., Ma, L., Lv, Y. & Tan, T. Facile manufacture of COF-based mixed matrix membranes for efficient CO2 separation. Chem. Eng. J. 430, 133001 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  19. Müller, M. & Abetz, V. Nonequilibrium processes in polymer membrane formation: theory and experiment. Chem. Rev. 121, 14189–14231 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  20. Huang, Y., Wang, M. & Chung, T. Development of multifunctional membranes via plasma-assisted nonsolvent induced phase separation. Nat. Commun. 15, 1092 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  21. Chisca, S. et al. Polytriazole membranes with ultrathin tunable selective layer for crude oil fractionation. Science 376, 1105–1110 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  22. Zhao, C., Xue, J., Ran, F. & Sun, S. Modification of polyethersulfone membranes-A review of methods. Prog. Mater. Sci. 58, 76–150 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  23. Karatay, E., Kalıpçılar, H. & Yılmaz, L. Preparation and performance assessment of binary and ternary PES-SAPO 34-HMA based gas separation membranes. J. Membr. Sci. 364, 75–81 (2010).

    Google Scholar 

  24. Yousef, S., Šereika, J., Tonkonogovas, A., Hashem, T. & Mohamed, A. CO2/CH4, CO2/N2 and CO2/H2 selectivity performance of PES membranes under high pressure and temperature for biogas upgrading systems. Environ. Technol. Innov. 21, 101339 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  25. Cervellere, M. R., Qian, X., Ford, D. M., Carbrello, C. & Millett, P. C. Phase-field modeling of non-solvent induced phase separation (NIPS) for PES/NMP/Water with comparison to experiments. J. Membr. Sci. 619, 118779 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  26. Hardian, R. et al. Design of mixed-matrix mof membranes with asymmetric filler density and intrinsic MOF/polymer compatibility for enhanced molecular sieving. Adv. Mater. 36, 26 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  27. Liu, Y. X. et al. Construction of covalent organic frameworks membranes in situ through nonsolvent-induce phase separation for fast and accurate nanofiltration. J. Membr. Sci. 697, 122601 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  28. Kandambeth, S. et al. Construction of crystalline 2D covalent organic frameworks with remarkable chemical (acid/base) stability via a combined reversible and irreversible route. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 134, 19524–19527 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  29. Yang, H. et al. Hierarchical pore architectures from 2D covalent organic nanosheets for efficient water/alcohol separation. J. Membr. Sci. 561, 79–88 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  30. Ismail, A. F., Norida, R., Rahman, W. A., Matsuura, T. & Hashemifard, S. A. Preparation and characterization of hyperthin-skinned and high performances asymmetric polyethersulfone membrane for gas separation. Desalination 273, 93–104 (2011).

    Google Scholar 

  31. Wang, P. et al. Single-phase covalent organic framework staggered stacking nanosheet membrane for CO2-selective separation. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 60, 19047–19052 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  32. Kang, Z. et al. Mixed matrix membranes (MMMs) comprising exfoliated 2D covalent organic frameworks (COFs) for efficient CO2 separation. Chem. Mater. 28, 1277–1285 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  33. Ullah, S. et al. Synthesis and characterization of iso-reticular metal-organic Framework-3 (IRMOF-3) for CO2/CH4 adsorption: Impact of post-synthetic aminomethyl propanol (AMP) functionalization. J. Nat. Gas Sci. Eng. 72, 103014 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  34. Ku, A. Y., Kulkarni, P., Shisler, R. & Wei, W. Membrane performance requirements for carbon dioxide capture using hydrogen-selective membranes in integrated gasification combined cycle (IGCC) power plants. J. Membr. Sci. 367, 233–239 (2011).

    Google Scholar 

  35. Zhang, W. et al. Reconstructed covalent organic frameworks. Nature 604, 72–79 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  36. Xu, H., Tao, S. & Jiang, D. Proton conduction in crystalline and porous covalent organic frameworks. Nat. Mater. 15, 722–726 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  37. Shah, J. K. et al. Cassandra: an open source Monte Carlo package for molecular simulation. J. Comput. Chem. 38, 1727–1739 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  38. Kaminski, G. A., Friesner, R. A., Tirado-Rives, J. & Jorgensen, W. L. Evaluation and reparametrization of the OPLS-AA force field for proteins via comparison with accurate quantum chemical calculations on peptides. J. Phys. Chem. B 105, 6474–6487 (2001).

    Google Scholar 

  39. Jorgensen, W. L., Maxwell, D. S. & Tirado-Rives, J. Development and testing of the OPLS all-atom force field on conformational energetics and properties of organic liquids. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 118, 11225–11236 (1996).

    Google Scholar 

  40. Do Ngoc, S., Nguyen, T. X. H., Nam, T. & Pham, T. K. Highly selective separation of CO2 and H2 by MIL-88A metal organic framework. VNU J. Sci. Math. Phys. 37, 2588–1124 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  41. Robeson, L. M. The upper bound revisited. J. Membr. Sci. 320, 390–400 (2008).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was financially supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 22169015), the Natural Science Foundation of Ningxia Hui Autonomous Region (Grant No. 2021AAC02003) and the Innovation Group Project of Ningxia Natural Science Foundation (Grant No. 2024AAC01002). We would like to thank Weitao Xia and Peng Wang at the Analytical and Testing Center of Ningxia University for their assistance with SEM (Hitachi SU5000 SEM) and XRD (Bruker D8 Advance A25) analysis. We would like to thank Beishide, Beijing, China, for the porosity test (BSD-TD Automatic True Density Analyzer) and pore size analysis (BSD-PB Comprehensive Membrane Pore Size Analyzer).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. College of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Ningxia University, Yinchuan, Ningxia, China

    Li-Hua Qi, Zheng Wang, Tong-He Zhang, Zhongmin Feng, Ling Huang & Shengping Wang

  2. School of Materials and New Energy, Ningxia University, Yinchuan, China

    Zheng Wang

  3. Key Laboratory for Green Chemical Technology, School of Chemical Engineering and Technology, Tianjin University, Collaborative Innovation Center of Chemical Science and Engineering, Tianjin, China

    Shengping Wang

  4. Department of Chemical and Biological Engineering, Monash University, Clayton, VIC, Australia

    Huanting Wang

Authors
  1. Li-Hua Qi
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Zheng Wang
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Tong-He Zhang
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Zhongmin Feng
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Ling Huang
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Shengping Wang
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Huanting Wang
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

L.H.Q. and Z.W. conceived the research. L.H.Q. designed and performed experiments. L.H.Q.(Li-Hua Qi), T.H.Z., and L.H.(Ling Huang) performed the characterization and results analysis. L.H.Q., and Z.M.F. assisted with the figure production and experiment design. L.H.Q. design the theoretical calculation. L.H.Q., Z.W., S.P.W., and H.T.W. wrote and edited the manuscript. All authors discussed the results and commented on the manuscript.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Zheng Wang or Huanting Wang.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Peer review

Peer review information

Nature Communications thanks the anonymous reviewers for their contribution to the peer review of this work. A peer review file is available.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Information

Description of Additional Supplementary File

Supplementary Data 1.

Transparent Peer Review file

Source data

Source Data

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if you modified the licensed material. You do not have permission under this licence to share adapted material derived from this article or parts of it. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Qi, LH., Wang, Z., Zhang, TH. et al. Asymmetrical covalent organic framework mixed matrix membranes for highly efficient gas separation. Nat Commun (2026). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-026-68790-w

Download citation

  • Received: 25 August 2025

  • Accepted: 13 January 2026

  • Published: 22 January 2026

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-026-68790-w

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

Download PDF

Advertisement

Explore content

  • Research articles
  • Reviews & Analysis
  • News & Comment
  • Videos
  • Collections
  • Subjects
  • Follow us on Facebook
  • Follow us on Twitter
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed

About the journal

  • Aims & Scope
  • Editors
  • Journal Information
  • Open Access Fees and Funding
  • Calls for Papers
  • Editorial Values Statement
  • Journal Metrics
  • Editors' Highlights
  • Contact
  • Editorial policies
  • Top Articles

Publish with us

  • For authors
  • For Reviewers
  • Language editing services
  • Open access funding
  • Submit manuscript

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

  • Explore articles by subject
  • Find a job
  • Guide to authors
  • Editorial policies

Nature Communications (Nat Commun)

ISSN 2041-1723 (online)

nature.com sitemap

About Nature Portfolio

  • About us
  • Press releases
  • Press office
  • Contact us

Discover content

  • Journals A-Z
  • Articles by subject
  • protocols.io
  • Nature Index

Publishing policies

  • Nature portfolio policies
  • Open access

Author & Researcher services

  • Reprints & permissions
  • Research data
  • Language editing
  • Scientific editing
  • Nature Masterclasses
  • Research Solutions

Libraries & institutions

  • Librarian service & tools
  • Librarian portal
  • Open research
  • Recommend to library

Advertising & partnerships

  • Advertising
  • Partnerships & Services
  • Media kits
  • Branded content

Professional development

  • Nature Awards
  • Nature Careers
  • Nature Conferences

Regional websites

  • Nature Africa
  • Nature China
  • Nature India
  • Nature Japan
  • Nature Middle East
  • Privacy Policy
  • Use of cookies
  • Legal notice
  • Accessibility statement
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Your US state privacy rights
Springer Nature

© 2026 Springer Nature Limited

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing