Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Advertisement

Nature Communications
  • View all journals
  • Search
  • My Account Login
  • Content Explore content
  • About the journal
  • Publish with us
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed
  1. nature
  2. nature communications
  3. articles
  4. article
Structural basis for transcriptional regulation by the cell division regulator MraZ in Mycoplasma genitalium
Download PDF
Download PDF
  • Article
  • Open access
  • Published: 29 January 2026

Structural basis for transcriptional regulation by the cell division regulator MraZ in Mycoplasma genitalium

  • Lucía Sánchez-Alba  ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0001-7353-10971,
  • Nathalia Varejão  ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0002-6952-88961,
  • Alexandre Durand  ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0002-9173-68862,
  • Javier García-Pardo  ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0001-9179-63711,
  • Maria Carreras-Caballé  ORCID: orcid.org/0009-0000-1182-91383,
  • Virginia Amador  ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0002-3016-28743,
  • Jaume Pinyol  ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0002-9055-89341 &
  • …
  • David Reverter  ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0002-5347-09921 

Nature Communications , Article number:  (2026) Cite this article

We are providing an unedited version of this manuscript to give early access to its findings. Before final publication, the manuscript will undergo further editing. Please note there may be errors present which affect the content, and all legal disclaimers apply.

Subjects

  • Cell division
  • Electron microscopy
  • Gene regulation
  • Transcriptional regulatory elements

Abstract

Cell division is a central process in all living organisms and requires the coordinated action of many proteins and regulatory elements. In most bacteria, the division and cell wall (dcw) gene cluster is regulated by the first gene of the dcw operon, mraZ, a highly conserved DNA-binding transcriptional regulator. Here we report the structural basis of MraZ transcriptional regulation by the resolution of three different cryo-EM structures of MraZ in complex with the upstream promoter region of the dcw cluster from Mycoplasma genitalium at 3.36, 3.57 and 3.87 Å resolution. The structures reveal the specific interactions between MraZ DNA-binding motif and nucleobases of the binding boxes, which induces distortion in the MraZ octamer to enable the interaction with the four repetitive binding boxes of the promoter DNA. The “cradle-like” DNA-binding motif of MraZ exposes three highly conserved basic residues, Lys13, Arg15 and Arg86, which are essential for binding to the consensus sequence of its cognate promoter. Ultimately, the mechanism behind MraZ’s DNA binding and regulation of the dcw operon could be translated to other species, working as a general mechanism for the regulation of dcw gene cluster in bacteria.

Data availability

Coordinates from crystal structures reported here have been deposited in the Protein Data Bank under accession codes 9QLG (MraZ octamer) and 9QLR (MraZ nonamer). CryoEM coordinates and maps have been deposited in the Protein Data Bank under accession codes 9R4J and EMD-53569 (MraZ Fiber 1), 9SZ7 and EMD-55361 (MraZ Fiber 2), and 9SX6 and EMD-55332 (MraZ Octamer-DNA). Other Protein Data Bank accession codes used in this study: 1N0E (MraZ M.pneumoniae), 2W1T (SpoVT), 1Z0R (AbrB) and 2FY9] (AbH). All other data supporting the findings of this study are available within the article and its supplementary information files. Source data are provided in this paper.

References

  1. Hutchison, C. A. et al. Global transposon mutagenesis and a minimal mycoplasma genome. Science 286, 2165–2169 (1999).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Glass, J. I. et al. Essential genes of a minimal bacterium. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 103, 425–430 (2006).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Lluch-Senar, M. et al. Defining a minimal cell: essentiality of small ORFs and ncRNAs in a genome-reduced bacterium. Mol. Syst. Biol. 11, 780 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Errington, J. et al. Cytokinesis in bacteria. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 67, 52–65 (2003).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Weiss, D. S. Bacterial cell division and the septal ring. Mol. Microbiol. 54, 588–597 (2004).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Goehring, N. W. & Beckwith, J. Diverse paths to midcell: assembly of the bacterial cell division machinery. Curr. Biol. 15, R514–R526 (2005).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Tamames, J. et al. Bringing gene order into bacterial shape. Trends Genet. 17, 124–126 (2001).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Vicente, M. et al. Regulation of transcription of cell division genes in the Escherichia coli dcw cluster. Cell. Mol. Life Sci. 54, 317–324 (1998).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Eraso, J. M. et al. The highly conserved MraZ protein is a transcriptional regulator in Escherichia coli. J. Bacteriol. 196, 2053–2066 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Alarcón, F. et al. Genes involved in cell division in mycoplasmas. Genet. Mol. Biol. 30, 174–181 (2007).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Benders, G. A. et al. Transcriptional Analysis of the Conserved ftsZ Gene Cluster in Mycoplasma genitalium and Mycoplasma pneumoniae. J. Bacteriol. 187, 4542–4551 (2005).

    Google Scholar 

  12. Martínez-Torró, C. et al. Functional characterization of the cell division gene cluster of the wall-less bacterium mycoplasma genitalium. Front. Microbiol. 12, 695572 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  13. Lluch-Senar, M. et al. Cell division in a minimal bacterium in the absence of ftsZ. Mol. Microbiol. 78, 278–289 (2010).

    Google Scholar 

  14. Fisunov, G. Y. et al. Binding site of MraZ transcription factor in Mollicutes. Biochimie 125, 59–65 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  15. White, M. L. et al. MraZ Transcriptionally controls the critical level of FtsL required for focusing Z-rings and kickstarting septation in Bacillus subtilis. J. Bacteriol. 204, e00243-22 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  16. Maeda, T. et al. RNase III mediated cleavage of the coding region of mraZ mRNA is required for efficient cell division in Corynebacterium glutamicum. Mol. Microbiol. 99, 1149–1166 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  17. Xu, X. et al. Beyond a ribosomal RNA methyltransferase, the wider role of MraW in DNA methylation, motility and colonization in Escherichia coli O157:H7. Front. Microbiol. 10, 2520 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  18. Kyuma, T. et al. Ribosomal RNA methyltransferases contribute to Staphylococcus aureus virulence. FEBS J. 282, 2570–2584 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  19. Kimura, S. & Suzuki, T. Fine-tuning of the ribosomal decoding center by conserved methyl-modifications in the Escherichia coli 16S rRNA. Nucleic Acids Res. 38, 1341–1352 (2010).

    Google Scholar 

  20. Adams, D. W. & Errington, J. Bacterial cell division: assembly, maintenance and disassembly of the Z ring. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 7, 642–653 (2009).

    Google Scholar 

  21. Busiek, K. K. & Margolin, W. Bacterial actin and tubulin homologs in cell growth and division. Curr. Biol. 25, R243–R254 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  22. Fujita, J. et al. Crystal structure of FtsA from Staphylococcus aureus. FEBS Lett. 588, 1879–1885 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  23. Vicente, M. & Rico, A. I. The order of the ring: assembly of Escherichia coli cell division components. Mol. Microbiol. 61, 5–8 (2006).

    Google Scholar 

  24. Dai, K. & Lutkenhaus, J. The proper ratio of FtsZ to FtsA is required for cell division to occur in Escherichia coli. J. Bacteriol. 174, 6145–6151 (1992).

    Google Scholar 

  25. Dewar, S. J. et al. Inhibition of cell division initiation by an imbalance in the ratio of FtsA to FtsZ. J. Bacteriol. 174, 6314–6316 (1992).

    Google Scholar 

  26. Bisson-Filho, A. W. et al. Treadmilling by FtsZ filaments drives peptidoglycan synthesis and bacterial cell division. Science 355, 739–743 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  27. Dai, K. & Lutkenhaus, J. ftsZ is an essential cell division gene in Escherichia coli. J. Bacteriol. 173, 3500–3506 (1991).

    Google Scholar 

  28. Beall, B. & Lutkenhaus, J. FtsZ in Bacillus subtilis is required for vegetative septation and for asymmetric septation during sporulation. Genes Dev. 5, 447–455 (1991).

    Google Scholar 

  29. Trespidi, G. et al. Molecular characterization of the Burkholderia cenocepacia dcw operon and FtsZ interactors as new targets for novel antimicrobial design. Antibiotics 9, 841 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  30. Nyongesa, S. et al. Evolution of longitudinal division in multicellular bacteria of the Neisseriaceae family. Nat. Commun. 13, 4853 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  31. Wang, C. et al. Structural insights into the PrpTA toxin–antitoxin system in Pseudoalteromonas rubra. Front. Microbiol. 13, 1053255 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  32. Sultan, M. et al. Targeting the G-quadruplex as a novel strategy for developing antibiotics against hypervirulent drug-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. J. Biomed. Sci. 32, 15 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  33. Chen, S. et al. Crystal structure of a protein associated with cell division from Mycoplasma pneumoniae (GI: 13508053): a novel fold with a conserved sequence motif. Proteins 55, 785–791 (2004).

    Google Scholar 

  34. Adams, M. A. et al. MraZ from Escherichia coli: cloning, purification, crystallization and preliminary X-ray analysis. Acta Crystallogr. F Struct. Biol. Cryst. Commun. 61, 378–380 (2005).

    Google Scholar 

  35. Bobay, B. G. et al. Revised structure of the AbrB N-terminal domain unifies a diverse superfamily of putative DNA-binding proteins. FEBS Lett. 579, 5669–5674 (2005).

    Google Scholar 

  36. Sullivan, D. M. et al. Insights into the nature of DNA binding of AbrB-like tanscription factors. Structure 16, 1702–1713 (2008).

    Google Scholar 

  37. Coles, M. et al. AbrB-like transcription factors assume a swapped hairpin fold that is evolutionarily related to double-Psi β barrels. Structure 13, 919–928 (2005).

    Google Scholar 

  38. Raumann, B. E. et al. DNA recognition by beta-sheets in the Arc repressor-operator crystal structure. Nature 367, 754–757 (1994).

    Google Scholar 

  39. Somers, W. S. & Phillips, S. E. V. Crystal structure of the met represser–operator complex at 2.8 Å resolution reveals DNA recognition by β-strands. Nature 359, 387–393 (1992).

    Google Scholar 

  40. Costa, M. et al. Plasmid transcriptional repressor CopG oligomerises to render helical superstructures unbound and in complexes with oligonucleotides1. J. Mol. Biol. 310, 403–417 (2001).

    Google Scholar 

  41. Gomis-Rüth, F. X. et al. The structure of plasmid-encoded transcriptional repressor CopG unliganded and bound to its operator. EMBO J. 17, 7404–7415 (1998).

    Google Scholar 

  42. Stefanucci, A. et al. A novel β-hairpin peptide derived from the ARC repressor selectively interacts with the major groove of B-DNA. Bioorg. Chem. 112, 104836 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  43. Weber, L. et al. The conserved Dcw gene cluster of R. sphaeroides is preceded by an uncommonly extended 5’ leader featuring the sRNA UpsM. PLoS ONE 11, e0165694 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  44. Alva, V. et al. A vocabulary of ancient peptides at the origin of folded proteins. ELife 4, e09410 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  45. Coles, M. et al. Common evolutionary origin of swapped-hairpin and double-psi beta barrels. Structure 14, 1489–1498 (2006).

    Google Scholar 

  46. Asen, I. et al. Crystal structure of SpoVT, the final modulator of gene expression during spore development in Bacillus subtilis. J. Mol. Biol. 386, 962–975 (2009).

    Google Scholar 

  47. Dong, T. C. et al. DNA-binding studies on the Bacillus subtilis transcriptional regulator and AbrB homologue, SpoVT. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 233, 247–256 (2004).

    Google Scholar 

  48. Chumsakul, O. et al. Genome-wide binding profiles of the Bacillus subtilis transition state regulator AbrB and its homolog Abh reveals their interactive role in transcriptional regulation. Nucleic Acids Res. 39, 414–428 (2011).

    Google Scholar 

  49. Olson, A. L. et al. Structure and DNA-Binding Traits of the Transition State Regulator AbrB. Structure 22, 1650–1656 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  50. Vaughn, J. L. et al. The DNA-binding domain in the Bacillus subtilis transition-state regulator AbrB employs significant motion for promiscuous DNA recognition. J. Mol. Biol. 305, 429–439 (2001).

    Google Scholar 

  51. Krissinel, E. & Henrick, K. Inference of macromolecular assemblies from crystalline state. J. Mol. Biol. 372, 774–797 (2007).

    Google Scholar 

  52. Schymkowitz, J. et al. The FoldX web server: an online force field. Nucleic Acids Res. 33, W382–W388 (2005).

    Google Scholar 

  53. Kuriata, A. et al. Aggrescan3D (A3D) 2.0: prediction and engineering of protein solubility. Nucleic Acids Res. 47, W300–W307 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  54. Bachman, J. Chapter Ninteen - Site-Directed Mutagenesis. In Methods in Enzymology 529, 241–248, (Academic Press, 2013)

  55. Juanhuix, J. et al. Developments in optics and performance at BL13-XALOC, the macromolecular crystallography beamline at the Alba Synchrotron. J. Synchrotron. Rad. 21, 679–689 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  56. McCarthy, A. A. et al. ID30B – a versatile beamline for macromolecular crystallography experiments at the ESRF. J. Synchrotron. Rad. 25, 1249–1260 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  57. Vonrhein, C. et al. Data processing and analysis with the autoPROC toolbox. Acta Cryst. D 67, 293–302 (2011).

    Google Scholar 

  58. Emsley, P. et al. Features and development of Coot. Acta Cryst. D 66, 486–501 (2010).

    Google Scholar 

  59. Adams, P. D. et al. PHENIX: a comprehensive Python-based system for macromolecular structure solution. Acta Cryst. D 66, 213–221 (2010).

    Google Scholar 

  60. Mastronarde, D. N. Automated electron microscope tomography using robust prediction of specimen movements. J. Struct. Biol. 152, 36–51 (2005).

    Google Scholar 

  61. Punjani, A. et al. cryoSPARC: algorithms for rapid unsupervised cryo-EM structure determination. Nat. Methods 14, 290–296 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  62. Rohou, A. & Grigorieff, N. CTFFIND4: Fast and accurate defocus estimation from electron micrographs. J. Struct. Biol. 192, 216–221 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  63. Kimanius, D. et al. New tools for automated cryo-EM single-particle analysis in RELION-4.0. Biochem. J. 478, 4169–4185 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  64. Kimanius, D. et al. Data-driven regularization lowers the size barrier of cryo-EM structure determination. Nat. Methods 21, 1216–1221 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  65. Wagner, T. et al. SPHIRE-crYOLO is a fast and accurate fully automated particle picker for cryo-EM. Commun. Biol. 2, 1–13 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  66. He, J. et al. Improvement of cryo-EM maps by simultaneous local and non-local deep learning. Nat. Commun. 14, 3217 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  67. Tegunov, D. & Cramer, P. Real-time cryo-electron microscopy data preprocessing with Warp. Nat. Methods 16, 1146–1152 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  68. Ettwiller, L. et al. A novel enrichment strategy reveals unprecedented number of novel transcription start sites at single base resolution in a model prokaryote and the gut microbiome. BMC Genom. 17, 199 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  69. Crooks, G. E., Hon, G., Chandonia, J. M. & Brenner, S. E. WebLogo: a sequence logo generator. Genome Res. 14, 1188–1190 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the Spanish Ministry of Science and Innovation (MICINN) PID2024-160233OB-I00 to D.R., PID2024-156687OB-I00 to V.A. and PID2024-159663OB-C21 to J.P.; and by ICREA to DR, ICREA-Academia-2022, from Generalitat de Catalunya. L.S.A. acknowledges her FPI fellowship from the Spanish Government (PRE2019-088509). D.R. acknowledges support from the Serra Hunter program from Generalitat de Catalunya. X-ray experiments were performed at BL-13 XALOC beamline at ALBA Synchrotron with the collaboration of ALBA staff. This work benefited from access to IGBMC, an Instruct-ERIC Center. Financial support was provided by Instruct-ERIC internship APPID 3074 and PID 27465. We thank the Microscopy Services (UAB). We thank Nils Marechal (IGBMC-CBI) for his help with cryoEM sample preparation, data collection and insightful discussions. We also thank Pablo Guerra (IBMB-CSIC, JEMCA, ALBA Synchrotron) for his help in obtaining preliminary cryoEM data.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Institut de Biotecnologia i Biomedicina and Departament de Bioquímica i Biologia Molecular. Universitat Autònoma de, Barcelona, Bellaterra, Spain

    Lucía Sánchez-Alba, Nathalia Varejão, Javier García-Pardo, Jaume Pinyol & David Reverter

  2. Institut de Génétique et de Biologie Molecule et Cellulaire, 1 Rue Laurent Fries, Illkirch, Cedex, France

    Alexandre Durand

  3. Institut de Investigacions Biomèdiques Agustí Pi i Sunyer (IDIBABS), Barcelona, Spain

    Maria Carreras-Caballé & Virginia Amador

Authors
  1. Lucía Sánchez-Alba
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Nathalia Varejão
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Alexandre Durand
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Javier García-Pardo
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Maria Carreras-Caballé
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Virginia Amador
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Jaume Pinyol
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  8. David Reverter
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

L.S.A. conducted crystallization experiments. A.D, L.S.A., and J.G.P. performed the cryoEM analysis. J.P. analyzed the promotor sequences. L.S.A. and N.V. conducted all in vitro activity assays. M.C-C. and V.A. conducted qPCR analysis. D.R., N.V., and L.S.A. contributed to the correction and writing of the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to David Reverter.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Peer review

Peer review information

Nature Communications thanks Naruhiko Adachi, Vadim Govorun and the other anonymous reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work. A peer review file is available.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Figs.

Reporting Summary

Transparent Peer Review file

Source data

Source Data File

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if you modified the licensed material. You do not have permission under this licence to share adapted material derived from this article or parts of it. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Sánchez-Alba, L., Varejão, N., Durand, A. et al. Structural basis for transcriptional regulation by the cell division regulator MraZ in Mycoplasma genitalium. Nat Commun (2026). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-026-68809-2

Download citation

  • Received: 28 July 2025

  • Accepted: 08 January 2026

  • Published: 29 January 2026

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-026-68809-2

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

Download PDF

Advertisement

Explore content

  • Research articles
  • Reviews & Analysis
  • News & Comment
  • Videos
  • Collections
  • Subjects
  • Follow us on Facebook
  • Follow us on Twitter
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed

About the journal

  • Aims & Scope
  • Editors
  • Journal Information
  • Open Access Fees and Funding
  • Calls for Papers
  • Editorial Values Statement
  • Journal Metrics
  • Editors' Highlights
  • Contact
  • Editorial policies
  • Top Articles

Publish with us

  • For authors
  • For Reviewers
  • Language editing services
  • Open access funding
  • Submit manuscript

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

  • Explore articles by subject
  • Find a job
  • Guide to authors
  • Editorial policies

Nature Communications (Nat Commun)

ISSN 2041-1723 (online)

nature.com sitemap

About Nature Portfolio

  • About us
  • Press releases
  • Press office
  • Contact us

Discover content

  • Journals A-Z
  • Articles by subject
  • protocols.io
  • Nature Index

Publishing policies

  • Nature portfolio policies
  • Open access

Author & Researcher services

  • Reprints & permissions
  • Research data
  • Language editing
  • Scientific editing
  • Nature Masterclasses
  • Research Solutions

Libraries & institutions

  • Librarian service & tools
  • Librarian portal
  • Open research
  • Recommend to library

Advertising & partnerships

  • Advertising
  • Partnerships & Services
  • Media kits
  • Branded content

Professional development

  • Nature Awards
  • Nature Careers
  • Nature Conferences

Regional websites

  • Nature Africa
  • Nature China
  • Nature India
  • Nature Japan
  • Nature Middle East
  • Privacy Policy
  • Use of cookies
  • Legal notice
  • Accessibility statement
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Your US state privacy rights
Springer Nature

© 2026 Springer Nature Limited

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing