Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Advertisement

Nature Communications
  • View all journals
  • Search
  • My Account Login
  • Content Explore content
  • About the journal
  • Publish with us
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed
  1. nature
  2. nature communications
  3. articles
  4. article
Carbon sequestration for geological negative emissions of the shale gas value chain in China
Download PDF
Download PDF
  • Article
  • Open access
  • Published: 26 January 2026

Carbon sequestration for geological negative emissions of the shale gas value chain in China

  • Pu Hong  ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0003-4939-21161,
  • Meiyu Guo  ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0002-7379-66661,
  • Sai Liang  ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0002-6306-58002,
  • Wenrui Shi1,
  • Yumeng Li2 &
  • …
  • Xi Lu  ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0002-5063-37763 

Nature Communications , Article number:  (2026) Cite this article

  • 7126 Accesses

  • 10 Altmetric

  • Metrics details

We are providing an unedited version of this manuscript to give early access to its findings. Before final publication, the manuscript will undergo further editing. Please note there may be errors present which affect the content, and all legal disclaimers apply.

Subjects

  • Climate-change mitigation
  • Energy policy

Abstract

Carbon sequestration in shale gas operations represents a crucial pathway to achieve Geological Negative Emissions, which is essential for global 1.5 °C targets. However, the emissions reduction potential and economic viability of this approach in China’s shale gas value chain remain unclear. This study quantifies the potential for transforming China’s shale gas value chain from an emission source to a carbon sink, while revealing spatial heterogeneity in economic feasibility. Results demonstrate that synergistic deployment of CO2-based technologies can achieve Geological Negative Emissions across the value chain, with national carbon sink potential reaching 66 billion tonnes of CO2-equivalents and shale gas production increasing by 4,518 billion cubic meters. Multi-scenario economic assessments reveal that marine shale in the Sichuan Basin exhibits inherent profitability, whereas continental reservoirs require carbon credit integration or optimized production. Current Chinese carbon market prices provide insufficient incentives, implementing region-specific subsidies and enhancing carbon pricing frameworks could unlock this potential, thereby contributing to national carbon neutrality goals and multiple Sustainable Development Goals.

Similar content being viewed by others

Exploring negative emission potential of biochar to achieve carbon neutrality goal in China

Article Open access 05 February 2024

Challenges and opportunities for carbon neutrality in China

Article 21 December 2021

Comprehensive geological analysis and evaluation of the feasibility of renovating the Wanshunchang gas reservoir into a gas storage facility

Article Open access 02 January 2025

Data availability

The authors declare that the data supporting the findings of this study are available within the paper and its supplementary information files. Source data are provided with this paper.

Code availability

The datasets generated during and/or analyzed during the current study are available at https://github.com/SEU-lingfeng/Cumulative-climate-impact. Source data for Figs. 2–5 and Supplementary Figs. are provided as a Source Data file. Source data are provided in this paper.

References

  1. Aloulou, F. & Zaretskaya, V. China extracts commercially viable natural gas from deeper shale formations. Today Energy https://www.eia.gov/todayinenergy/detail.php?id=63284 (2024).

  2. PetroChina National High-end Think Tank Research Center. China Natural Gas Development Report in 2024 (Petroleum Industry Press, 2024).

  3. Wang, J., Xue, M., Fan, J., Bentley, Y. & Wang, X. Does shale gas exploitation contribute to regional sustainable development? Evidence from China. Sustain. Prod. Consumption 40, 169–181 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Mei, Y., Liu, W., Wang, J. & Bentley, Y. Shale gas development and regional economic growth: evidence from fuling. China. Energy 239, 122254 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Burnham, A. et al. Life-cycle greenhouse gas emissions of shale gas, natural gas, coal, and petroleum. Environ. Sci. Technol. 46, 619–627 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Liang, B. et al. Carbon capture, utilization and storage (CCUS) in oil and gas reservoirs in China: status, opportunities and challenges. Fuel 375, 132353 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Jiang, K. & Ashworth, P. The development of carbon capture utilization and storage (CCUS) research in China: a bibliometric perspective. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 138, 110521 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Lyu, Q. et al. The role of supercritical carbon dioxide for recovery of shale gas and sequestration in gas shale reservoirs. Energy Environ. Sci. 14, 4203–4227 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Middleton, R. S. et al. Shale gas and non-aqueous fracturing fluids: Opportunities and challenges for supercritical CO2. Appl. Energy 147, 500–509 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Lackner, K. S. A guide to CO2 sequestration. Science 300, 1677–1678 (2003).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Verdon, J. P. et al. Comparison of geomechanical deformation induced by megatonne-scale CO2 storage at Sleipner, Weyburn, and in Salah. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 110, E2762–E2771 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  12. Edwards, R. W. J., Celia, M. A., Bandilla, K. W., Doster, F. & Kanno, C. M. A model to estimate carbon dioxide injectivity and storage capacity for geological sequestration in shale gas wells. Environ. Sci. Technol. 49, 9222–9229 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  13. Liu, F., Ellett, K., Xiao, Y. & Rupp, J. A. Assessing the feasibility of CO2 storage in the New Albany shale (Devonian–Mississippian) with potential enhanced gas recovery using reservoir simulation. Int. J. Greenhouse Gas Control 17, 111–126 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  14. Tao, Z. & Clarens, A. Estimating the carbon sequestration capacity of shale formations using methane production rates. Environ. Sci. Technol. 47, 11318–11325 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  15. Levine, J. S. et al. U.S. DOE NETL methodology for estimating the prospective CO2 storage resource of shales at the national and regional scale. Int. J. Greenhouse Gas Control 51, 81–94 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  16. Ji, T., Jiang, P. & Xu, R. Technology portfolios optimization to deliver cost-effective shale gas development: Using CO2 versus water. Fuel 335, 127006 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  17. Wilkins, R., Menefee, A. H. & Clarens, A. F. Environmental life cycle analysis of water and CO2-based fracturing fluids used in unconventional gas production. Environ. Sci. Technol. 50, 13134–13141 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  18. Huang, J., Jin, T., Barrufet, M. & Killough, J. Evaluation of CO2 injection into shale gas reservoirs considering dispersed distribution of kerogen. Appl. Energy 260, 114285 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  19. Tong, Z. et al. Eco-friendly electric-powered hydraulic fracturing towards shale-gas recovery: efficiency, economics, and field application. In Proc. SPE International Hydraulic Fracturing Technology Conference & Exhibition D022S022R001 (OnePetro, 2022).

  20. Wang, J. L. et al. Large-scale controlled experiment demonstrates effectiveness of methane leak detection and repair programs at oil and gas facilities. Environ. Sci. Technol. 58, 3194–3204 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  21. Ravikumar, A. P. et al. Repeated leak detection and repair surveys reduce methane emissions over scale of years. Environ. Res. Lett. 15, 034029 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  22. Huo, H., Zhang, Q., Liu, F. & He, K. Climate and environmental effects of electric vehicles versus compressed natural gas vehicles in China: a life-cycle analysis at provincial level. Environ. Sci. Technol. 47, 1711–1718 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  23. Tavakkoli, S., Feng, L., Miller, S. M. & Jordaan, S. M. Implications of generation efficiencies and supply chain leaks for the life cycle greenhouse gas emissions of natural gas-fired electricity in the United States. Environ. Sci. Technol. 56, 2540–2550 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  24. Chang, Y., Huang, R., Ries, R. J. & Masanet, E. Life-cycle comparison of greenhouse gas emissions and water consumption for coal and shale gas fired power generation in China. Energy 86, 335–343 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  25. Tyner, D. R. & Johnson, M. R. Where the methane is—insights from novel airborne LiDAR measurements combined with ground survey data. Environ. Sci. Technol. 55, 9773–9783 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  26. Allen, M. R. et al. Geological net zero and the need for disaggregated accounting for carbon sinks. Nature 638, 343–350 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  27. Ritchie, H., Rosado, P. & Roser, M. Greenhouse gas emissions. Our World Data https://ourworldindata.org/greenhouse-gas-emissions (2024).

  28. National Bureau of Statistics. China Statistical Yearbook 2024. https://www.stats.gov.cn/sj/ndsj/2024/indexeh.htm (2024).

  29. State and Trends of Carbon Pricing Dashboard. World Bank Group https://carbonpricingdashboard.worldbank.org/compliance/price (2023).

  30. COP29 opens in Baku with breakthrough on global carbon markets. COP29.Baku Azerbaijan https://cop29.az/en/media-hub/news/cop29-opens-in-baku-with-breakthrough-on-global-carbon-markets (2024).

  31. Rennert, K. et al. Comprehensive evidence implies a higher social cost of CO2. Nature 610, 687–692 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  32. Xu, J., Guan, Y., Oldfield, J., Guan, D. & Shan, Y. China carbon emission accounts 2020-2021. Appl. Energy 360, 122837 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  33. Xu, W. et al. Phase-field method of crack branching during SC-CO2 fracturing: a new energy release rate criterion coupling pore pressure gradient. Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng. 399, 115366 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  34. Zhang, C. P., Liu, S., Ma, Z. Y. & Ranjith, P. G. Combined micro-proppant and supercritical carbon dioxide (SC-CO2) fracturing in shale gas reservoirs: a review. Fuel 305, 121431 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  35. Huang, L. et al. Effect of organic type and moisture on CO2/CH4 competitive adsorption in kerogen with implications for CO2 sequestration and enhanced CH4 recovery. Appl. Energy 210, 28–43 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  36. Xie, W. et al. Effects of gas components, reservoir property, and pore structure of shale gas reservoir on the competitive adsorption behavior of CO2 and CH4. Energy 254, 124242 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  37. Shen, Y. et al. Water imbibition of shale and its potential influence on shale gas recovery—a comparative study of marine and continental shale formations. J. Nat. Gas Sci. Eng. 35, 1121–1128 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  38. Zhu, H., Tao, L., Tian, S. & Wang, H. First field trail and experimental studies on scCO2 fracturing. In Proc. Mechanics of Hydraulic Fracturing: Experiment, Model, and Monitoring 51–64 (John Wiley & Sons, 2022).

  39. Zhang, X., Lu, Y., Tang, J., Zhou, Z. & Liao, Y. Experimental study on fracture initiation and propagation in shale using supercritical carbon dioxide fracturing. Fuel 190, 370–378 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  40. Schepers, K. C., Nuttall, B., Oudinot, A. Y. & Gonzalez, R. Reservoir modeling and simulation of the Devonian gas shale of eastern Kentucky for enhanced gas recovery and CO2 storage. In Proc. SPE International Conference on CO2 Capture, Storage, and Utilization SPE-126620-MS (SPE International Conference on CO2 Capture, Storage, and Utilization, 2009).

  41. Liu, J. et al. Research on mechanism and effect of enhancing gas recovery by CO2 huff-n-puff in shale gas reservoir. ACS Omega 9, 33111–33118 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  42. Damen, K. Reforming Fossil Fuel Use the Merits, Costs and Risks of Carbon Dioxide Capture and Storage (Utrecht University, 2007).

  43. Wang, J., Liu, M., McLellan, B. C., Tang, X. & Feng, L. Environmental impacts of shale gas development in China: a hybrid life cycle analysis. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 120, 38–45 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  44. Chen, G. et al. An improved method for estimating GHG emissions from onshore oil and gas exploration and development in China. Sci. Total Environ. 574, 707–715 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  45. Shi, W. et al. Water use for shale gas development in China’s Fuling shale gas field. J. Cleaner Prod. 256, 120680 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  46. Wang, S. et al. Environmental impacts from conventional and shale gas and oil development in China considering regional differences and well depth. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 167, 105368 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  47. Chang, Y., Huang, R., Ries, R. J. & Masanet, E. Shale-to-well energy use and air pollutant emissions of shale gas production in China. Appl. Energy 125, 147–157 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  48. Tong, F., Jaramillo, P. & Azevedo, I. M. L. Comparison of life cycle greenhouse gases from natural gas pathways for medium and heavy-duty vehicles. Environ. Sci. Technol. 49, 7123–7133 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  49. Yuan, Z., Ou, X., Peng, T. & Yan, X. Life cycle greenhouse gas emissions of multi-pathways natural gas vehicles in China considering methane leakage. Appl. Energy 253, 113472 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  50. Zhang, Y. et al. Life cycle assessment of ammonia synthesis in China. Int. J. Life Cycle Assess. 27, 50–61 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  51. Ling, Y. et al. Carbon emissions in China’s thermal electricity and heating industry: An input-output structural decomposition analysis. J. Cleaner Prod. 329, 129608 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  52. Chen, S. et al. Shale gas reservoir characterisation: a typical case in the southern Sichuan basin of China. Energy 36, 6609–6616 (2011).

    Google Scholar 

  53. Addendum to technical support document on social cost of carbon for regulatory impact analysis under Executive Order 12866: application of the methodology to estimate the social cost of methane and the social cost of nitrous oxide. Interagency Working Group on Social Cost of Greenhouse Gases https://19january2017snapshot.epa.gov/climatechange/social-cost-carbon-technical-documentation_.html (2016).

  54. Technical update of the social cost of carbon for regulatory impact analysis ­ under Executive Order 12866. Interagency Working Group on Social Cost of Greenhouse Gases https://19january2017snapshot.epa.gov/climatechange/social-cost-carbon-technical-documentation_.html (2016).

  55. Li, S. et al. Distribution characteristics, exploration and development, geological theories research progress, and exploration directions of shale gas in China. China Geol 5, 110–135 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  56. Zeng, B., Chen, G., Meng, W. & Wang, J. Prediction, analysis and suggestions of shale gas production in China based on a new grey model with four parameters. Alexandria Eng. J. 86, 258–276 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  57. Zimmerle, D. J. et al. Gathering pipeline methane emissions in Fayetteville shale pipelines and scoping guidelines for future pipeline measurement campaigns. Elem. Sci. Anth. 5, 70 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  58. Gvakharia, A. et al. Methane, black carbon, and ethane emissions from natural gas flares in the Bakken shale, North Dakota. Environ. Sci. Technol. 51, 5317–5325 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  59. Plant, G. et al. Inefficient and unlit natural gas flares both emit large quantities of methane. Science 377, 1566–1571 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  60. Khanna, N., Lin, J., Liu, X. & Wang, W. An assessment of China’s methane mitigation potential and costs and uncertainties through 2060. Nat. Commun. 15, 9694 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  61. Sheng, J. J. Critical review of field EOR projects in shale and tight reservoirs. J. Pet. Sci. Eng. 159, 654–665 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  62. Schwietzke, S. et al. Aerially guided leak detection and repair: a pilot field study for evaluating the potential of methane emission detection and cost-effectiveness. J. Air Waste Manage. Assoc. 69, 71–88 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  63. Kruschwitz, L. & Löffler, A. Stochastic Discounted Cash Flow: A Theory of the Valuation of Firms (Springer Nature, 2020).

  64. Ma, X. A compendium and comparative study of shale gas support policies in China and the U. S. Technol. Econ. Petrochem. 39, 35 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  65. Eggleston, H., Buendia, L., Miwa, K., Ngara, T. & Tanabe, K. 2006 IPCC Guidelines For National Greenhouse Gas Inventories (IPCC, 2006).

Download references

Acknowledgements

This research is supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (grant Nos. 52325005, 72293602, and 52388101 to S.L.), the General Research Fund (grant No. 12616222 to M.G.) and Early Career Scheme (grant No. 22611624 to M.G.) of Hong Kong Research Grants Council, and the Guangdong Natural Science Fund (grant No. 2025A1515010017 to M.G.).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Geography, Hong Kong Baptist University, Kowloon, Hong Kong SAR, China

    Pu Hong, Meiyu Guo & Wenrui Shi

  2. Guangdong Basic Research Center of Excellence for Ecological Security and Green Development, Key Laboratory for City Cluster Environmental Safety and Green Development of the Ministry of Education, School of Ecology, Environment and Resources, Guangdong University of Technology, Guangzhou, China

    Sai Liang & Yumeng Li

  3. State Key Joint Laboratory of Environment Simulation and Pollution Control, School of Environment, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China

    Xi Lu

Authors
  1. Pu Hong
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Meiyu Guo
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Sai Liang
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Wenrui Shi
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Yumeng Li
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Xi Lu
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

M.G. and P.H. conceived the project. P.H. conducted data retrieval and performed subsequent evaluation calculations. M.G. and W.S. supervised part of the model construction. M.G., S.L., and X.L. jointly guided the writing framework. Y.L. advised on the visualization design. P.H., M.G., and S.L. co-wrote and revised the manuscript.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Meiyu Guo or Sai Liang.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Peer review

Peer review information

Nature Communications thanks Haoming Ma and the other anonymous, reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work. A peer review file is available.”

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Information (download PDF )

Reporting Summary (download PDF )

Transparent Peer Review file (download PDF )

Source data

Source Data (download XLSX )

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if you modified the licensed material. You do not have permission under this licence to share adapted material derived from this article or parts of it. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Hong, P., Guo, M., Liang, S. et al. Carbon sequestration for geological negative emissions of the shale gas value chain in China. Nat Commun (2026). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-026-68829-y

Download citation

  • Received: 24 January 2025

  • Accepted: 14 January 2026

  • Published: 26 January 2026

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-026-68829-y

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

Download PDF

Advertisement

Explore content

  • Research articles
  • Reviews & Analysis
  • News & Comment
  • Videos
  • Collections
  • Subjects
  • Follow us on Facebook
  • Follow us on X
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed

About the journal

  • Aims & Scope
  • Editors
  • Journal Information
  • Open Access Fees and Funding
  • Calls for Papers
  • Editorial Values Statement
  • Journal Metrics
  • Editors' Highlights
  • Contact
  • Editorial policies
  • Top Articles

Publish with us

  • For authors
  • For Reviewers
  • Language editing services
  • Open access funding
  • Submit manuscript

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

  • Explore articles by subject
  • Find a job
  • Guide to authors
  • Editorial policies

Nature Communications (Nat Commun)

ISSN 2041-1723 (online)

nature.com footer links

About Nature Portfolio

  • About us
  • Press releases
  • Press office
  • Contact us

Discover content

  • Journals A-Z
  • Articles by subject
  • protocols.io
  • Nature Index

Publishing policies

  • Nature portfolio policies
  • Open access

Author & Researcher services

  • Reprints & permissions
  • Research data
  • Language editing
  • Scientific editing
  • Nature Masterclasses
  • Research Solutions

Libraries & institutions

  • Librarian service & tools
  • Librarian portal
  • Open research
  • Recommend to library

Advertising & partnerships

  • Advertising
  • Partnerships & Services
  • Media kits
  • Branded content

Professional development

  • Nature Awards
  • Nature Careers
  • Nature Conferences

Regional websites

  • Nature Africa
  • Nature China
  • Nature India
  • Nature Japan
  • Nature Middle East
  • Privacy Policy
  • Use of cookies
  • Legal notice
  • Accessibility statement
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Your US state privacy rights
Springer Nature

© 2026 Springer Nature Limited

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing