Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Advertisement

Nature Communications
  • View all journals
  • Search
  • My Account Login
  • Content Explore content
  • About the journal
  • Publish with us
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed
  1. nature
  2. nature communications
  3. articles
  4. article
Net widening of Southern California beaches
Download PDF
Download PDF
  • Article
  • Open access
  • Published: 29 January 2026

Net widening of Southern California beaches

  • Jonathan A. Warrick  ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0002-0205-38141,
  • Kilian Vos2,
  • Daniel D. Buscombe1,3,
  • Andrew C. Ritchie1,
  • Sean Vitousek  ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0002-3369-46731,
  • Teresa Hachey  ORCID: orcid.org/0009-0002-5196-39344 &
  • …
  • Brett F. Sanders  ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0002-1592-52044 

Nature Communications , Article number:  (2026) Cite this article

We are providing an unedited version of this manuscript to give early access to its findings. Before final publication, the manuscript will undergo further editing. Please note there may be errors present which affect the content, and all legal disclaimers apply.

Subjects

  • Environmental impact
  • Geomorphology
  • Natural hazards

Abstract

Human impacts from dams reduce river sediment fluxes and are primary causes of coastal erosion worldwide. Here we provide new satellite-derived shoreline observation techniques to examine beach area trends across the diverse coastal settings of California. Contrary to global trends, these data reveal that the most heavily urbanized and dammed region of southern California experienced net beach growth of over 2 million m2 during 1984-2024. While several beaches experienced severe erosion, overall widening is explained by sufficient sediment supply and concentrated widening from longshore transport captured at coastal structures and in littoral convergence zones. These results indicate that adequate sediment sources exist in this human-modified landscape to mitigate coastal erosion, but that this sediment is not effectively distributed to vulnerable beaches. This highlights the critical role that longshore sediment transport plays in long-term beach trends and illuminates management opportunities for coastal sustainability at the regional scale.

Data availability

Beach segment locations, source CoastSat transects, and mean annual shoreline positions and annual values of uncertainty for all 329 beach segments of California are tabulated and published in Warrick (2025)74. The raw shoreline position measurements that were used to derive the mean annual shoreline positions are published and available from the CoastSat data publication by Vos42, version 1.5. Beach width measurements for each CoastSat transect are published in Warrick and Buscombe76. Hindcast wave data were obtained from the European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts (ECMWF) Reanalysis Version 5 (ERA5) hindcasts of as detailed by Soci et al.61 and made available at https://www.ecmwf.int/en/forecasts/dataset/ecmwf-reanalysis-v5 (accessed May 14, 2025). Beach nourishment rates were obtained from the ASBPA National Beach Nourishment Database as detailed by Elko et al.64 and made available at: https://asbpa.org/national-beach-nourishment-database/ (accessed May 14, 2025). Mean river discharge of littoral-grade sand for the Santa Barbara Littoral Cell was obtained from Barnard and Warrick54.

Code availability

Codes used to generate shoreline positions from satellite imagery are provided in the gitbub site: https://github.com/kvos/CoastSat. Codes used to compute deseasonalized annual shoreline positions from the raw CoastSat data are provided in the USGS Software Release by Warrick44: https://doi.org/10.5066/P1UYMOK7.

References

  1. Mehvar, S. et al. Quantifying economic value of coastal ecosystem services: a review. JMSE 6, 5 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Zhang, F., Wang, X. H., Nunes, P. A. L. D. & Ma, C. The recreational value of Gold Coast beaches, Australia: an application of the travel cost method. Ecosyst. Serv. 11, 106–114 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Defeo, O. et al. Threats to sandy beach ecosystems: a review. Estuar. Coast. Shelf Sci. 81, 1–12 (2009).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Castelle, B. & Masselink, G. Morphodynamics of wave-dominated beaches. Camb. Prism. Coast. Futures 1, e1 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  5. FitzGerald, D. M., Fenster, M. S., Argow, B. A. & Buynevich, I. V. Coastal Impacts Due to Sea-Level Rise. Annu. Rev. Earth Planet. Sci. 36, 601–647 (2008).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Warrick, J. A., East, A. E. & Dow, H. Fires, floods and other extreme events–How watershed processes under climate change will shape our coastlines. Camb. Prisms Coast. Futures 1, e2 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Armstrong, S. B. & Lazarus, E. D. Masked shoreline erosion at large spatial scales as a collective effect of beach nourishment. Earth’s. Future 7, 74–84 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  8. King, E. V. et al. Wave, tide and topographical controls on headland sand bypassing. J. Geophys. Res. Oceans 126, (2021).

  9. Komar, P. D. Beach Processes and Sedimentation. (Prentice Hall, 1998).

  10. Short, A. D. Australian beach systems: Are they at risk to climate change? Ocean Coast. Manag. 224, 106180 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Syvitski, J. et al. Earth’s sediment cycle during the Anthropocene. Nat. Rev. Earth Environ. https://doi.org/10.1038/s43017-021-00253-w (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  12. Castelle, B. et al. Impact of the winter 2013–2014 series of severe Western Europe storms on a double-barred sandy coast: Beach and dune erosion and megacusp embayments. Geomorphology 238, 135–148 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  13. Wang, H. et al. Recent changes of sediment flux to the western Pacific Ocean from major rivers in East and Southeast Asia. Earth-Sci. Rev. 108, 80–100 (2011).

    Google Scholar 

  14. Alves, B., Angnuureng, D. B., Morand, P. & Almar, R. A review on coastal erosion and flooding risks and best management practices in West Africa: What has been done and should be done. J. Coast Conserv 24, 38 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  15. Besset, M., Anthony, E. J. & Bouchette, F. Multi-decadal variations in delta shorelines and their relationship to river sediment supply: an assessment and review. Earth Sci. Rev. 193, 199–219 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  16. Li, X., Liu, J. P., Saito, Y. & Nguyen, V. L. Recent evolution of the Mekong Delta and the impacts of dams. Earth Sci. Rev. 175, 1–17 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  17. Trimble, S. W. Contribution of stream channel erosion to sediment yield from an urbanizing watershed. Science 278, 1442–1444 (1997).

    Google Scholar 

  18. Russell, K. L., Vietz, G. J. & Fletcher, T. D. Global sediment yields from urban and urbanizing watersheds. Earth Sci. Rev. 168, 73–80 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  19. Anthony, E. et al. A 7000-year record of human influence on Global River Deltas: Geomorphology, stratigraphy, the Anthropocene overprint and future. Earth Sci. Rev. 271, 105302 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  20. MacKenzie, K. M., Singh, K., Binns, A. D., Whiteley, H. R. & Gharabaghi, B. Effects of urbanization on stream flow, sediment, and phosphorous regime. J. Hydrol. 612, 128283 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  21. Vitousek, S., Barnard, P. L. & Limber, P. Can beaches survive climate change? J. Geophys. Res. Earth Surf. 122, 1060–1067 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  22. Cooper, J. A. G. et al. Sandy beaches can survive sea-level rise. Nat. Clim. Chang. 10, 993–995 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  23. Cosby, A. G. et al. Accelerating growth of human coastal populations at the global and continent levels: 2000–2018. Sci. Rep. 14, 22489 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  24. Willis, C. M. & Griggs, G. B. Reductions in fluvial sediment discharge by coastal dams in California and implications for beach sustainability. J. Geol. 111, 167–182 (2003).

    Google Scholar 

  25. Inman, D. L. & Chamberlain, T. K. Littoral Sand Budget along the Southern California Coast. 245–246 (1960).

  26. Patsch, K. B. & Griggs, G. B. Littoral Cells, Sand Budgets, and Beaches: Understanding California’s Shoreline. 40 (2006).

  27. Hapke, C. J., Reid, D. & Richmond, B. Rates and trends of coastal change in california and the regional behavior of the Beach and Cliff System. J. Coast. Res. 253, 603–615 (2009).

    Google Scholar 

  28. Slagel, M. J. & Griggs, G. B. Cumulative Losses of Sand to the California Coast by Dam Impoundment. J. Coast. Res. 243, 571–584 (2008).

    Google Scholar 

  29. Shepard, F. P. Beach Cycles in Southern California. 33 p. (1950).

  30. Inman, D. L. & Brush, B. M. The coastal challenge. Sci., N. Ser. 181, 20–32 (1973).

    Google Scholar 

  31. Yates, M. L., Guza, R. T. & O’Reilly, W. C. Equilibrium shoreline response: Observations and modeling. J. Geophys. Res. 114, (2009).

  32. Flick, R. E. The myth and reality of Southern California beaches. Shore Beach 61, 3–13 (1993).

    Google Scholar 

  33. Thorne, K. M., MacDonald, G. M., Chavez, F. P., Ambrose, R. F. & Barnard, P. L. Significant challenges to the sustainability of the California coast considering climate change. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. Usa. 121, e2310077121 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  34. Griggs, G. & Patsch, K. California’s coastal development: Sea-level rise and extreme events—Where do we go from here? Shore & Beach 15–28 https://doi.org/10.34237/1008722 (2019).

  35. King, P. G. et al. Valuing beach ecosystems in an age of retreat. Shore beach 86, 45–59 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  36. Vitousek, S., Vos, K., Splinter, K. D., Erikson, L. & Barnard, P. L. A model integrating satellite-derived shoreline observations for predicting fine-scale shoreline response to waves and sea-level rise across large coastal regions. JGR Earth Surf. 128, e2022JF006936 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  37. Amrouni, O., Heggy, E. & Hzami, A. Shoreline retreat and beach nourishment are projected to increase in Southern California. Commun. Earth Environ. 5, 274 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  38. Warrick, J. A. & Rubin, D. M. Suspended-sediment rating curve response to urbanization and wildfire, Santa Ana River, California. J. Geophys. Res. 112, (2007).

  39. King, P. G., McGregor, A. R. & Whittet, J. D. Can California coastal managers plan for sea-level rise in a cost-effective way? J. Environ. Plan. Manag. 59, 98–119 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  40. Anderson, R. B. The taboo of retreat: The politics of sea level rise, managed retreat, and coastal property values in California. Econ. Anthropol. 9, 284–296 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  41. Vos, K., Harley, M. D., Splinter, K. D., Simmons, J. A. & Turner, I. L. Sub-annual to multi-decadal shoreline variability from publicly available satellite imagery. Coast. Eng. 150, 160–174 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  42. Vos, K. Time-series of shoreline change along the Pacific Rim. Zenodo https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7758183 (2025).

  43. Warrick, J. A. et al. Shoreline seasonality of California’s Beaches. JGR Earth Surf. 130, e2024JF007836 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  44. Warrick, J. A. Shoreline STL Decomposition Software. https://doi.org/10.5066/P1UYMOK7 (2025).

  45. Young, A. P. et al. Southern California coastal response to the 2015–2016 El Niño. JGR Earth Surf. 123, 3069–3083 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  46. Barnard, P. L. et al. Extreme oceanographic forcing and coastal response due to the 2015–2016 El Niño. Nat. Commun. 8, 1–8 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  47. Barnard, P. L. et al. The impact of the 2009-10 El Niño Modoki on U.S. West Coast beaches: EL NIÑO impact on USA west coast beaches. Geophys. Res. Lett. 38, n/a-n/a (2011).

  48. Storlazzi, C. D. & Griggs, G. B. Influence of El Nino-Southern Oscillation (ENSO) events on the evolution of central California’s shoreline. Geol. Soc. Am. Bull. 112, 236–249 (2000).

    Google Scholar 

  49. Warrick, J. A., Vos, K., Buscombe, D., Ritchie, A. C. & Curtis, J. A. A Large Sediment Accretion Wave Along a Northern California Littoral Cell. JGR Earth Surf. 128, e2023JF007135 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  50. Vos, K., Harley, M. D., Turner, I. L. & Splinter, K. D. Pacific shoreline erosion and accretion patterns controlled by El Niño/Southern Oscillation. Nat. Geosci. 16, 140–146 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  51. Griggs, G. B. & Patsch, K. B. Natural Changes and Human Impacts on the Sand Budgets and Beach widths of the Zuma and Santa Monica littoral cells, Southern California. Shore Beach 86, 3–16 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  52. Kahl, D. T., Vulis, L. M., Schubert, J. E. & Sanders, B. F. Characterizing longshore transport potential and divergence of drift to inform beach loss trends. Coast. Eng. 189, 104473 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  53. Warrick, J. A. Littoral sediment from rivers: patterns, rates and processes of river mouth morphodynamics. Front. Earth Sci. 8, 355 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  54. Barnard, P. L. & Warrick, J. A. Dramatic beach and nearshore morphological changes due to extreme flooding at a wave-dominated river mouth. Mar. Geol. 271, 131–148 (2010).

    Google Scholar 

  55. Ludka, B. C., Guza, R. T. & O’Reilly, W. C. Nourishment evolution and impacts at four southern California beaches: a sand volume analysis. Coast. Eng. 136, 96–105 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  56. Valiente, N. G., McCarroll, R. J., Masselink, G., Scott, T. & Wiggins, M. Multi-annual embayment sediment dynamics involving headland bypassing and sediment exchange across the depth of closure. Geomorphology 343, 48–64 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  57. Warrick, J. A. et al. Large-scale dam removal on the Elwha River, Washington, USA: Source-to-sink sediment budget and synthesis. Geomorphology 246, 729–750 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  58. Limber, P. W., Patsch, K. B. & Griggs, G. B. Coastal sediment budgets and the littoral cutoff diameter: a grain size threshold for quantifying active sediment inputs. J. Coast. Res. 2, 122–133 (2008).

    Google Scholar 

  59. O’Reilly, W. C., Olfe, C. B., Thomas, J., Seymour, R. J. & Guza, R. T. The California coastal wave monitoring and prediction system. Coast. Eng. 116, 118–132 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  60. O’Reilly, W. C. et al. Interannual wave-driven shoreline change on the California coast. Nat. Commun. 16, 9967 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  61. Soci, C. et al. The ERA5 global reanalysis from 1940 to 2022. Quart. J. R. Meteor. Soc. 150, 4014–4048 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  62. Vos, K. et al. Benchmarking satellite-derived shoreline mapping algorithms. Commun. Earth Environ. 4, 345 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  63. Syvitski, J. P. M. & Milliman, J. D. Geology, geography, and humans battle for dominance over the delivery of fluvial sediment to the coastal ocean. J. Geol. 115, 1–19 (2007).

    Google Scholar 

  64. Elko, N. et al. A century of U.S. beach nourishment. Ocean Coast. Manag. 199, 105406 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  65. Yates, M. L., Guza, R. T., O’Reilly, W. C. & Seymour, R. J. Overview of seasonal sand level changes on southern California beaches. Shore Beach 77, 39–46 (2009).

    Google Scholar 

  66. Rangel-Buitrago, N. & Neal, W. The unsustainable harvest of coastal sands. Science 382, 1116–1118 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  67. Greimann, B., Sheydayi, P., Vargas, S., Lai, Y. & Mefford, B. Developing Mitigation Plans for Matilija Dam Removal. in World Environmental and Water Resources Congress 2008 1–9 (American Society of Civil Engineers, 2008). https://doi.org/10.1061/40976(316)349.

  68. Cui, Y. et al. Analyses of the erosion of fine sediment deposit for a large dam-removal project: an empirical approach. Int. J. River Basin Manag. 15, 103–114 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  69. Ulibarri, N. et al. Barriers and opportunities for beneficial reuse of sediment to support coastal resilience. Ocean Coast. Manag. 195, 105287 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  70. Goodrich, K. A. et al. Toward improved sediment management and coastal resilience through efficient permitting in California. Environ. Manag. 72, 558–567 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  71. Ludka, B. C. & and 15 others. Sixteen years of bathymetry and waves and San Diego beaches. Sci. Data 6, (2019).

  72. Vitousek, S. et al. The future of coastal monitoring through satellite remote sensing. Camb. prisms Coast. futures 1, e10 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  73. Vos, K., Harley, M. D., Splinter, K. D., Walker, A. & Turner, I. L. Beach slopes from satellite-derived shorelines. Geophys. Res. Lett. 47, (2020).

  74. Warrick, J. A. Data to Support Analyses of Widening and Narrowing of Beach Segments in California. https://doi.org/10.5066/P139YRVP (2025).

  75. Cleveland, R. B., Cleveland, W. S., McRae, J. E. & Terpenning, I. STL: A seasonal-trend decomposition procedure based on loess. J. Off. Stat. 6, 3–73 (1990).

    Google Scholar 

  76. Warrick, J. A. & Buscombe, D. Data to Support Analyses of Shoreline Seasonal Cycles for Beaches of California. U.S. Geological Survey Data Release https://doi.org/10.5066/P14WWHOJ (2024).

  77. Adams, P. N., Inman, D. L. & Graham, N. E. Southern California deep-water wave climate: characterization and application to Coastal Processes. J. Coast. Res. 244, 1022–1035 (2008).

    Google Scholar 

  78. Warrick, J. A. & Farnsworth, K. L. Sources of sediment to the coastal waters of the Southern California Bight. in Earth Science in the Urban Ocean: The Southern California Continental Borderland (Geological Society of America, 2009). https://doi.org/10.1130/2009.2454(2.2).

  79. San Diego Association of Governments (SANDAG). Coastal Regional Sediment Management Plan for the San Diego Region. 220 https://dbw.parks.ca.gov/?page_id=29337 (2009).

  80. Gadd, P. E., Leidersdorf, C. B., Hearon, G., Shak, A. T. & Ryan, J. Use Of “Statistical” Depth Of Closure To Resolve Historical Changes In Shorezone Volume, Huntington Beach Littoral Cell, Ca, Usa. in Coastal Engineering 2006 5302–5311 (World Scientific Publishing Company, 2007). https://doi.org/10.1142/9789812709554_0444.

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the U.S. Geological Survey’s Coastal and Marine Hazards and Resources Program through the Remote Sensing Coastal Change project. Additional funding provided by NASA grant NNH21ZDA001 (BS, TH). Any use of trade, firm, or product names is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. U.S. Geological Survey, Santa Cruz, CA, USA

    Jonathan A. Warrick, Daniel D. Buscombe, Andrew C. Ritchie & Sean Vitousek

  2. OHB Digital Services, Konrad-Zuse-Str. 8, Bremen, Germany

    Kilian Vos

  3. Washington State Department of Ecology, Applied Coastal Research and Engineering, Olympia, WA, USA

    Daniel D. Buscombe

  4. Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of California, Irvine, CA, USA

    Teresa Hachey & Brett F. Sanders

Authors
  1. Jonathan A. Warrick
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Kilian Vos
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Daniel D. Buscombe
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Andrew C. Ritchie
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Sean Vitousek
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Teresa Hachey
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Brett F. Sanders
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

J.A.W.—Primary author, data analyses, synthesis. K.V.—Data generation (shoreline change), data analyses. D.B.—Study design, data analysis, secondary author. A.R.—Study design, data analysis. S.V.—Data synthesis, secondary author. T.H.—Data generation and synthesis (longshore transport, sediment budgets). B.S.—Study design, primary author.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jonathan A. Warrick.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Peer review

Peer review information

Nature Communications thanks Aikaterini Konstantinou and the other anonymous reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work. A peer review file is available.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Information

Transparent Peer Review file

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Warrick, J.A., Vos, K., Buscombe, D.D. et al. Net widening of Southern California beaches. Nat Commun (2026). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-026-68880-9

Download citation

  • Received: 12 July 2025

  • Accepted: 30 December 2025

  • Published: 29 January 2026

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-026-68880-9

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

Download PDF

Advertisement

Explore content

  • Research articles
  • Reviews & Analysis
  • News & Comment
  • Videos
  • Collections
  • Subjects
  • Follow us on Facebook
  • Follow us on Twitter
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed

About the journal

  • Aims & Scope
  • Editors
  • Journal Information
  • Open Access Fees and Funding
  • Calls for Papers
  • Editorial Values Statement
  • Journal Metrics
  • Editors' Highlights
  • Contact
  • Editorial policies
  • Top Articles

Publish with us

  • For authors
  • For Reviewers
  • Language editing services
  • Open access funding
  • Submit manuscript

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

  • Explore articles by subject
  • Find a job
  • Guide to authors
  • Editorial policies

Nature Communications (Nat Commun)

ISSN 2041-1723 (online)

nature.com sitemap

About Nature Portfolio

  • About us
  • Press releases
  • Press office
  • Contact us

Discover content

  • Journals A-Z
  • Articles by subject
  • protocols.io
  • Nature Index

Publishing policies

  • Nature portfolio policies
  • Open access

Author & Researcher services

  • Reprints & permissions
  • Research data
  • Language editing
  • Scientific editing
  • Nature Masterclasses
  • Research Solutions

Libraries & institutions

  • Librarian service & tools
  • Librarian portal
  • Open research
  • Recommend to library

Advertising & partnerships

  • Advertising
  • Partnerships & Services
  • Media kits
  • Branded content

Professional development

  • Nature Awards
  • Nature Careers
  • Nature Conferences

Regional websites

  • Nature Africa
  • Nature China
  • Nature India
  • Nature Japan
  • Nature Middle East
  • Privacy Policy
  • Use of cookies
  • Legal notice
  • Accessibility statement
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Your US state privacy rights
Springer Nature

© 2026 Springer Nature Limited

Nature Briefing Anthropocene

Sign up for the Nature Briefing: Anthropocene newsletter — what matters in anthropocene research, free to your inbox weekly.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing: Anthropocene