Table 1 Objective functions, decision variables, and selected flows for the hybrid design (50 kW SOFC system); performance comparison among three designs for a 50 kW SOFC system

From: Scalable modular design of solid oxide fuel cell systems for enhanced large-scale power generation

Objective functions

Electrical efficiency, %

66.3

Global fuel utilization, -

0.98

External water flow rate, mol/s

0.085

Parameters

Parallel stacks

Series stack 1

Series stack 2

Series stack 3

Reformer temperature for pre-reformer, °C

539

533

518

519

Reforming ratio for pre-reformer

0.12

0.13

0.12

0.11

Natural gas flow rate, kg/s

0.0007

0.0003

0.0003

0.0003

Natural gas flow rate, mol/s

0.0409

0.0174

0.0187

0.0186

External water flow rate, mol/s

0.085

0

0

0

Fresh air input, mol/s

2.151

0.778

0.644

0.62

COG air input, mol/s

0

0.694

0.694

0.694

Air output O2 mole fraction, -

0.184

0.178

0.175

0.174

Air blower power, kW

0.74

0.64

Net power from module(s)

20.88

9.89

9.95

9.79

  

Hybrid

NCNA

NCHA

Natural gas flow rate, kW

76.67

81.98

79.77

External water flow rate, mol/s

0.085

0.212

0.085

Fresh air flow rate, mol/s

4.193

5.377

6.42

Electricity output, kW

50.51

52.79

45.9

Electrical efficiency, %

66.3

65.8

57.5

Heat available at 600 °C, kW

4.1

7.93

5.66

Heat available at 200 °C, kW

4.47

0.92

8.87

Cold utility requirement, kW

30.77

37.4

40.25

Additional electricity generated by RC, kW

2.03

2.14

2

Electrical efficiency with RC, %

68.5

67

60

Direct mixing points at high temperature

8

0

5

  1. COG cathode off-gas, RC Rankine cycle.