Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Advertisement

Nature Communications
  • View all journals
  • Search
  • My Account Login
  • Content Explore content
  • About the journal
  • Publish with us
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed
  1. nature
  2. nature communications
  3. articles
  4. article
Inhibition mechanism of the fungal β−1,3-glucan synthases by triterpenoid antifungal drugs
Download PDF
Download PDF
  • Article
  • Open access
  • Published: 04 February 2026

Inhibition mechanism of the fungal β−1,3-glucan synthases by triterpenoid antifungal drugs

  • Zi-Long You1 na1,
  • Lei Sun  ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0002-7899-03451 na1,
  • Le-Xuan Wang1 na1,
  • Yue-Ran Ni1,
  • Rui-Qing Lyu1,
  • Dan-Dan Chen1,
  • Cai-Hong Yun  ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0002-5880-83071,
  • Tiefeng Song2,
  • Yinggai Song3 &
  • …
  • Lin Bai  ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0002-7535-78191 

Nature Communications , Article number:  (2026) Cite this article

We are providing an unedited version of this manuscript to give early access to its findings. Before final publication, the manuscript will undergo further editing. Please note there may be errors present which affect the content, and all legal disclaimers apply.

Subjects

  • Cryoelectron microscopy
  • Fungal infection
  • Pharmacology

Abstract

β−1,3-glucan synthase is the molecular target for triterpenoid and echinocandin antifungal drugs in clinical. It catalyzes the formation of β−1,3-glucan, which is the primary component of the fungal cell wall. However, the inhibition mechanism of β−1,3-glucan synthase by triterpenoid drugs remains unclear. In this study, we report cryo-electron microscopy (cryo-EM) structures of Saccharomyces cerevisiae β−1,3-glucan synthase Fks1 and Fks2 in the apo state, the triterpenoid drug enfumafungin-bound state, and an open state. Structural analysis along with mutagenesis reveals the enfumafungin binding site, and the mechanism of the clinical drug-resistant mutations of the β−1,3-glucan synthases. Remarkably, the enfumafungin attaches on a single transmembrane helix TM5 of the β−1,3-glucan synthases, reorganizes its nearby lipid environment, and stabilizes the enzyme in a specific basal state with intact active site. Moreover, we elucidate that both the basal state and the open state are essential for FKS’s glycosyltransferase activity. Our research also shows that Fks2 is highly conserved with Fks1 in terms of structure, activity, and drug inhibition. These findings provide deep insights into the fungal cell wall synthesis, and will facilitate the development of antifungal drugs targeting β−1,3-glucan synthase.

Data availability

The cryo-EM 3D maps and the corresponding atomic models of the Fks1 and Fks2 have been deposited at the EMDB database and the RCSB PDB with the respective accession codes of EMD-66359 and 9WY1 (Fks1 in apo state), EMD-66409 and 9WZU (Fks1 in complex with enfumafungin), EMD-66410 and 9WZV (Fks1 with intact active site), EMD-66411 and 9WZX (Fks1 in open state), EMD-66408 and 9WZT (Fks2 in apo state), EMD-66407 and 9WZS (Fks2 in complex with enfumafungin), EMD-66419 and 9X04 (Fks2 with intact active site). PDB codes of previously published structures used in this study are 8WLA and 7YUY. MD simulation input, parameter, and output files are provided in Supplementary Data 1. Source data are provided as a Source Data file. Source data are provided with this paper.

References

  1. Hawksworth, D. L. The magnitude of fungal diversity: the 1.5 million species estimate revisited. Mycol. Res. 105, 1422–1432 (2001).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Nature Microbiology. Stop neglecting fungi. Nat. Microbiol. 2, 17120 (2017).

  3. Brown, G. D. et al. Hidden killers: human fungal infections. Sci. Transl. Med. 4, 165rv113 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Almeida, F., Rodrigues, M. L. & Coelho, C. The still underestimated problem of fungal diseases worldwide. Front. Microbiol. 10, 214 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Fisher, M. C. et al. Emerging fungal threats to animal, plant and ecosystem health. Nature 484, 186–194 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Lima, S. L., Colombo, A. L. & de Almeida, J. N. Fungal cell wall: emerging antifungals and drug resistance. Front. Microbiol. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2019.02573 (2019).

  7. Douglas, C. M. et al. The Saccharomyces cerevisiae Fks1 (Etg1) gene encodes an integral membrane-protein which is a subunit of 1,3-beta-D-glucan synthase. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 91, 12907–12911 (1994).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Mazur, P. et al. Differential expression and function of two homologous subunits of yeast 1,3-beta-D-glucan synthase. Mol. Cell Biol. 15, 5671–5681 (1995).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Qadota, H. et al. Identification of yeast Rho1p GTPase as a regulatory subunit of 1,3-beta-glucan synthase. Science 272, 279–281 (1996).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Arellano, M., Duran, A. & Perez, P. Rho1 GTPase activates the (1-3)beta-D-glucan synthase and is involved in Schizosaccharomyces pombe morphogenesis. Embo J. 15, 4584–4591 (1996).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Diaz, M. et al. The Schizosaccharomyces pombe Cwg2+ gene codes for the beta-subunit of a geranylgeranyltransferase type-I required for beta-glucan synthesis. Embo J. 12, 5245–5254 (1993).

    Google Scholar 

  12. Mazur, P. & Baginsky, W. In vitro activity of 1,3-beta-D-glucan synthase requires the GTP-binding protein Rho1. J. Biol. Chem. 271, 14604–14609 (1996).

    Google Scholar 

  13. Drgonova, J. et al. Rho1p, a yeast protein at the interface between cell polarization and morphogenesis. Science 272, 277–279 (1996).

    Google Scholar 

  14. Li, J. et al. Cryo-EM structure of the beta−1,3-glucan synthase FKS1-Rho1 complex. Nat. Commun. 16, 2054 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  15. Healey, K. R. et al. Differential regulation of echinocandin targets Fks1 and Fks2 in Candida glabrata by the post-transcriptional regulator Ssd1. J. Fungi (Basel) https://doi.org/10.3390/jof6030143 (2020).

  16. Katiyar, S. K. et al. Fks1 and Fks2 are functionally redundant but differentially regulated in Candida glabrata: implications for echinocandin resistance. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 56, 6304–6309 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  17. Garcia-Effron, G., Lee, S., Park, S., Cleary, J. D. & Perlin, D. S. Effect of Candida glabrata FKS1 and FKS2 mutations on echinocandin sensitivity and kinetics of 1,3-beta-D-glucan synthase: implication for the existing susceptibility breakpoint. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 53, 3690–3699 (2009).

    Google Scholar 

  18. Gonzalez-Jimenez, I. et al. Expression of 1,3-beta-glucan synthase subunits in Candida glabrata is regulated by the cell cycle and growth conditions and at both transcriptional and post-transcriptional levels. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 69, e0050025 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  19. Suwunnakorn, S., Wakabayashi, H., Kordalewska, M., Perlin, D. S. & Rustchenko, E. FKS2 and FKS3 genes of opportunistic human pathogen Candida albicans influence echinocandin susceptibility. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. https://doi.org/10.1128/AAC.02299-17 (2018).

  20. Douglas, C. M. et al. Identification of the FKS1 gene of Candida albicans as the essential target of 1,3-beta-D-glucan synthase inhibitors. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 41, 2471–2479 (1997).

    Google Scholar 

  21. Jallow, S. & Govender, N. P. Ibrexafungerp: a first-in-class oral triterpenoid glucan synthase inhibitor. J. Fungi https://doi.org/10.3390/jof7030163 (2021).

  22. Kumar, V., Huang, J., Dong, Y. W. & Hao, G. F. Targeting Fks1 proteins for novel antifungal drug discovery. Trends Pharm. Sci. 45, 366–384 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  23. Zhao, C. R. et al. Structure of a fungal 1,3-beta-glucan synthase. Sci. Adv. 9, eadh7820 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  24. Hu, X. L. et al. Structural and mechanistic insights into fungal ß−1,3-glucan synthase FKS1. Nature 616, 190 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  25. Morgan, J. L., Strumillo, J. & Zimmer, J. Crystallographic snapshot of cellulose synthesis and membrane translocation. Nature 493, 181–186 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  26. Datry, A. & Thellier, M. Echinocandins: a new class of antifungal agents, a new mechanism of action. J. Mycol. Med. 12, S5–S9 (2002).

    Google Scholar 

  27. Pound, M. W., Townsend, M. L. & Drew, R. H. Echinocandin pharmacodynamics: review and clinical implications. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 65, 1108–1118 (2010).

    Google Scholar 

  28. Wiederhold, N. P. Pharmacology, mechanisms of action, and unique characteristics of antifungal agents. Mycoses 54, 36–36 (2011).

    Google Scholar 

  29. McCarthy, M. W. Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of ibrexafungerp. Drugs RD 22, 9–13 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  30. Pelaez, F. et al. The discovery of enfumafungin, a novel antifungal compound produced by an endophytic Hormonema species biological activity and taxonomy of the producing organisms. Syst. Appl. Microbiol. 23, 333–343 (2000).

    Google Scholar 

  31. Onishi, J. et al. Discovery of novel antifungal (1,3)-beta-D-glucan synthase inhibitors. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 44, 368–377 (2000).

    Google Scholar 

  32. Jimenez-Ortigosa, C., Perez, W. B., Angulo, D., Borroto-Esoda, K. & Perlin, D. S. De novo acquisition of resistance to SCY-078 in Candida glabrata involves FKS mutations that both overlap and are distinct from those conferring echinocandin resistance. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. https://doi.org/10.1128/AAC.00833-17 (2017).

  33. Nunnally, N. S., Etienne, K. A., Angulo, D., Lockhart, S. R. & Berkow, E. L. In vitro activity of ibrexafungerp, a novel glucan synthase inhibitor against Candida glabrata isolates with FKS mutations. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. https://doi.org/10.1128/AAC.01692-19 (2019).

  34. Aldejohann, A. M. et al. In vitro activity of ibrexafungerp against clinically relevant echinocandin-resistant Candida strains. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 68, e0132423 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  35. Schwartz, R. E. et al. Isolation and structural determination of enfumafungin, a triterpene glycoside antifungal agent that is a specific inhibitor of glucan synthesis. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 122, 4882–4886 (2000).

    Google Scholar 

  36. Zhong, Y. L. et al. Synthesis of antifungal glucan synthase inhibitors from enfumafungin. J. Org. Chem. 77, 3297–3310 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  37. Apgar, J. M. et al. Novel orally active inhibitors of beta−1,3-glucan synthesis derived from enfumafungin. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 25, 5813–5818 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  38. Jorgensen, K. M., Astvad, K. M. T., Hare, R. K. & Arendrup, M. C. EUCAST ibrexafungerp MICs and wild-type upper limits for contemporary danish yeast isolates. J. Fungi (Basel) https://doi.org/10.3390/jof8101106 (2022).

  39. Mesquida, A. et al. DeltaF659 and F659S substitutions at the HS1 of FKS2 gene, along with E655A and W715L upstream and downstream substitutions, correlate with high ibrexafungerp MICs against Candidaglabrata. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. 28, 1154 e1155–1154 e1158 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  40. Perlin, D. S. Resistance to echinocandin-class antifungal drugs. Drug Resist. Updat. 10, 121–130 (2007).

    Google Scholar 

  41. Perlin, D. S. Mechanisms of echinocandin antifungal drug resistance. Ann. NY Acad. Sci. 1354, 1–11 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  42. Morgan, J. L., McNamara, J. T. & Zimmer, J. Mechanism of activation of bacterial cellulose synthase by cyclic di-GMP. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 21, 489–496 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  43. Morgan, J. L. W. et al. Observing cellulose biosynthesis and membrane translocation in crystallo. Nature 531, 329 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  44. Chen, D. D. et al. Structure, catalysis, chitin transport, and selective inhibition of chitin synthase. Nat. Commun. 14, 4776 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  45. Maloney, F. P. et al. Structure, substrate recognition and initiation of hyaluronan synthase. Nature 604, 195–201 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  46. Denning, D. W. Echinocandin antifungal drugs. Lancet 362, 1142–1151 (2003).

    Google Scholar 

  47. Saitô, H. Dynamic pictures of membrane proteins in two-dimensional crystal, lipid bilayer and detergent as revealed by site-directed solid-state C NMR. Chem. Phys. Lipids 132, 101–112 (2004).

    Google Scholar 

  48. Zocher, M., Zhang, C., Rasmussen, S. G. F., Kobilka, B. K. & Müller, D. J. Cholesterol increases kinetic, energetic, and mechanical stability of the human β-adrenergic receptor. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 109, E3463–E3472 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  49. Fioriti, S. et al. Antifungal combinations against Candida species: from bench to bedside. J. Fungi (Basel) https://doi.org/10.3390/jof8101077 (2022).

  50. Chandrasekar, P. H. & Sobel, J. D. Micafungin: a new echinocandin. Clin. Infect. Dis. 42, 1171–1178 (2006).

    Google Scholar 

  51. Roling, E. E. et al. Antifungal activities of fluconazole, caspofungin (MK0991), and anidulafungin (LY 303366) alone and in combination against Candida spp. and Crytococcus neoformans via time-kill methods. Diagn. Microbiol Infect. Dis. 43, 13–17 (2002).

    Google Scholar 

  52. Petraitis, V. et al. Combination therapy with ibrexafungerp (formerly SCY-078), a first-in-class triterpenoid inhibitor of (1–>3)-beta-d-glucan synthesis, and isavuconazole for treatment of experimental invasive pulmonary aspergillosis. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. https://doi.org/10.1128/AAC.02429-19 (2020).

  53. Ghannoum, M. et al. Evaluation of the antifungal activity of the novel oral glucan synthase inhibitor SCY-078, singly and in combination, for the treatment of invasive aspergillosis. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. https://doi.org/10.1128/AAC.00244-18 (2018).

Download references

Acknowledgments

Cryo-EM data were collected in the Peking University Health Science Center Cryo-Electron Microscopy Facility. We thank Dandan Chen and Lihong Chen for facilitating data collection. We thank Yong Wang for facilitating the MD analysis. This work was supported by grants from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (32571451 and 92578126 to L.B.), Beijing Natural Science Foundation (7252080 to L.B.), and Peking University (to L.B.).

Author information

Author notes
  1. These authors contributed equally: Zi-Long You, Lei Sun, Le-Xuan Wang.

Authors and Affiliations

  1. State Key Laboratory of Natural and Biomimetic Drugs, Department of Biophysics, School of Basic Medical Sciences, Peking University, Beijing, 100191, China

    Zi-Long You, Lei Sun, Le-Xuan Wang, Yue-Ran Ni, Rui-Qing Lyu, Dan-Dan Chen, Cai-Hong Yun & Lin Bai

  2. College of Life Sciences, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, 310027, China

    Tiefeng Song

  3. Peking University First Hospital, Peking University, Beijing, 100034, China

    Yinggai Song

Authors
  1. Zi-Long You
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Lei Sun
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Le-Xuan Wang
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Yue-Ran Ni
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Rui-Qing Lyu
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Dan-Dan Chen
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Cai-Hong Yun
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Tiefeng Song
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Yinggai Song
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  10. Lin Bai
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

Z.Y. and L.B. conceived and designed the experiments. Z.Y., L.S., L.W., Y.N., R.L., D.C., T.S., and L.B. performed the experiments. Z.Y., L.S., L.W., C.Y., Y.S., and L.B. analyzed the data. Z.Y. and L.B. wrote the paper with input from all authors.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lin Bai.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Peer review

Peer review information

Nature Communications thanks David Perlin and the other, anonymous, reviewers for their contribution to the peer review of this work. A peer review file is available.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Information

Description of Additional Supplementary Files

Supplementary Data 1

Reporting Summary

Transparent Peer Review file

Source data

Source Data

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if you modified the licensed material. You do not have permission under this licence to share adapted material derived from this article or parts of it. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

You, ZL., Sun, L., Wang, LX. et al. Inhibition mechanism of the fungal β−1,3-glucan synthases by triterpenoid antifungal drugs. Nat Commun (2026). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-026-69114-8

Download citation

  • Received: 17 September 2025

  • Accepted: 26 January 2026

  • Published: 04 February 2026

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-026-69114-8

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

Download PDF

Advertisement

Explore content

  • Research articles
  • Reviews & Analysis
  • News & Comment
  • Videos
  • Collections
  • Subjects
  • Follow us on Facebook
  • Follow us on Twitter
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed

About the journal

  • Aims & Scope
  • Editors
  • Journal Information
  • Open Access Fees and Funding
  • Calls for Papers
  • Editorial Values Statement
  • Journal Metrics
  • Editors' Highlights
  • Contact
  • Editorial policies
  • Top Articles

Publish with us

  • For authors
  • For Reviewers
  • Language editing services
  • Open access funding
  • Submit manuscript

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

  • Explore articles by subject
  • Find a job
  • Guide to authors
  • Editorial policies

Nature Communications (Nat Commun)

ISSN 2041-1723 (online)

nature.com sitemap

About Nature Portfolio

  • About us
  • Press releases
  • Press office
  • Contact us

Discover content

  • Journals A-Z
  • Articles by subject
  • protocols.io
  • Nature Index

Publishing policies

  • Nature portfolio policies
  • Open access

Author & Researcher services

  • Reprints & permissions
  • Research data
  • Language editing
  • Scientific editing
  • Nature Masterclasses
  • Research Solutions

Libraries & institutions

  • Librarian service & tools
  • Librarian portal
  • Open research
  • Recommend to library

Advertising & partnerships

  • Advertising
  • Partnerships & Services
  • Media kits
  • Branded content

Professional development

  • Nature Awards
  • Nature Careers
  • Nature Conferences

Regional websites

  • Nature Africa
  • Nature China
  • Nature India
  • Nature Japan
  • Nature Middle East
  • Privacy Policy
  • Use of cookies
  • Legal notice
  • Accessibility statement
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Your US state privacy rights
Springer Nature

© 2026 Springer Nature Limited

Nature Briefing: Translational Research

Sign up for the Nature Briefing: Translational Research newsletter — top stories in biotechnology, drug discovery and pharma.

Get what matters in translational research, free to your inbox weekly. Sign up for Nature Briefing: Translational Research