Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Advertisement

Nature Communications
  • View all journals
  • Search
  • My Account Login
  • Content Explore content
  • About the journal
  • Publish with us
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed
  1. nature
  2. nature communications
  3. articles
  4. article
Maximising environmental savings from silicon photovoltaics manufacturing to 2035
Download PDF
Download PDF
  • Article
  • Open access
  • Published: 03 February 2026

Maximising environmental savings from silicon photovoltaics manufacturing to 2035

  • Bethany L. Willis  ORCID: orcid.org/0009-0001-8248-45411,
  • Oliver M. Rigby  ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0003-3559-21251,
  • Sophie L. Pain  ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0003-1333-20232,
  • Nicholas E. Grant2,
  • John D. Murphy  ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0003-0993-59722,3,
  • Ruy S. Bonilla  ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0002-5395-58504 &
  • …
  • Neil S. Beattie  ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0002-0098-44201 

Nature Communications , Article number:  (2026) Cite this article

We are providing an unedited version of this manuscript to give early access to its findings. Before final publication, the manuscript will undergo further editing. Please note there may be errors present which affect the content, and all legal disclaimers apply.

Subjects

  • Energy infrastructure
  • Environmental impact
  • Solar cells

Abstract

The silicon photovoltaics market is transitioning from the incumbent passivated emitter rear cell to the higher efficiency tunnel oxide passivated contact technology and it is crucial to understand the environmental impact of this change. Here, we conduct life cycle assessment to compare both technologies quantitatively and identify environmental savings in 15 of 16 environmental impact categories for tunnel oxide passivated contact. This includes a 6.5% reduction in carbon dioxide equivalent emissions, per watt peak at the expense of 15.2% increase in metal resource use, for photovoltaic modules manufactured in China and transported to central Europe. A critical factor in photovoltaics manufacturing is the carbon intensity of the electricity mix. We model the impact of photovoltaics production across different global regions, incorporating future electricity mix scenarios and a projection for photovoltaics deployment. Our model provides a forecast of the environmental impact of global photovoltaics manufacturing and identifies a potential reduction of 8.2 gigatonnes of carbon dioxide equivalent emissions by 2035, depending on manufacturing location.

Data availability

The life cycle assessment data generated in this study are provided in the Supplementary Information and Supplementary Data files. All source data used to create figures are also provided in the Source Data file. Source data are provided with this paper.

References

  1. Nijsse, F. J. et al. The momentum of the solar energy transition. Nat. Commun. 14, 6542 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Alaaeddin, M., Sapuan, S., Zuhri, M., Zainudin, E. & Al-Oqla, F. M. Photovoltaic applications: Status and manufacturing prospects. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 102, 318–332 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  3. International Renewable Energy Agency (IRENA), Renewable Power Generation Costs in 2023. https://www.irena.org/-/media/Files/IRENA/Agency/Publication/2024/Sep/IRENA_Renewable_power_generation_costs_in_2023.pdf (2024).

  4. Global Solar Council. Global Solar Council announces 2 terawatt milestone achieved for solar. https://www.globalsolarcouncil.org/news/global-solar-council-announces-2-terawatt-milestone-achieved-for-solar/#:~:text=2%20terawatts%20of%20solar%20PV%20now%20installed&text=Notably%2C%202%20TW%20of%20solar,and%20a%2020%25%20capacity%20factor (2025).

  5. Goldschmidt, J. C., Wagner, L., Pietzcker, R. & Friedrich, L. Technological learning for resource efficient terawatt scale photovoltaics. Energy Environ. Sci. 14, 5147–5160 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Haegel, N. M. et al. Photovoltaics at multi-terawatt scale: waiting is not an option. Science 380, 39–42 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Xu, C., Isabella, O. & Vogt, M. R. Future material demand for global silicon-based PV modules under net-zero emissions target until 2050. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 210, 107824 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Santoyo-Castelazo, E. et al. Life cycle assessment for a grid-connected multi-crystalline silicon photovoltaic system of 3 kWp: A case study for Mexico. J. Clean. Prod. 316, 128314 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Méndez, L. et al. “Upgraded metallurgical grade silicon and polysilicon for solar electricity production: A comparative life cycle assessment. Sci. Total Environ. 789, 147969 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Jia, X., Zhou, C., Tang, T. & Wang, W. Life cycle assessment on PERC solar modules. Sol. Energy Mater. Sol. Cells 227, 111112 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Müller, A. et al. A comparative life cycle assessment of silicon PV modules: Impact of module design, manufacturing location and inventory. Sol. Energy Mater. Sol. Cells 230, 111277 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  12. Rashedi, A. & Khanam, T. Life cycle assessment of most widely adopted solar photovoltaic energy technologies by mid-point and end-point indicators of ReCiPe method. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 27, 29075–29090 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  13. Liang, H. & You, F. Reshoring silicon photovoltaics manufacturing contributes to decarbonization and climate change mitigation. Nat. Commun. 14, 1274 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  14. Lunardi, M. M., Alvarez-Gaitan, J., Chang, N. L. & Corkish, R. Life cycle assessment on PERC solar modules. Sol. Energy Mater. Sol. Cells 187, 154–159 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  15. Ballif, C., Haug, F. J., Boccard, M., Verlinden, P. J. & Hahn, G. Status and perspectives of crystalline silicon photovoltaics in research and industry. Nat. Rev. Mater. 7, 597–616 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  16. Wang, Z. et al. Environmental impact assessment of the manufacture and use of N-type and P-type photovoltaic modules in China. J. Clean. Prod. 470, 143187 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  17. Kluska, S. et al. Enabling savings in silver consumption and poly-Si thickness by integration of plated Ni/Cu/Ag contacts for bifacial TOPCon solar cells. Sol. Energy Mater. Sol. Cells 246, 111889 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  18. GovUK. Emissions of air pollutants in the UK - Non-methane volatile organic compounds (NMVOCs) Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs. https://www.gov.uk/government/statistics/emissions-of-air-pollutants/emissions-of-air-pollutants-in-the-uk-non-methane-volatile-organic-compounds-nmvocs (2025).

  19. Kreiger, M., Shonnard, D. & Pearce, J. M. Life cycle analysis of silane recycling in amorphous silicon-based solar photovoltaic manufacturing. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 70, 44–49 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  20. Cortés-Estrada, C. E., Ramírez-Márquez, C., Ponce-Ortega, J. M., Segovia-Hernández, J. G. & Martín, M. Optimization and sensitivity analysis of a multi-product solar grade silicon refinery: Considering environmental and economic metrics. Chem. Eng. Process. Process. Intensif. 183, 109237 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  21. Ansanelli, G., Fiorentino, G., Tammaro, M. & Zucaro, A. A life cycle assessment of a recovery process from end-of-life photovoltaic panels. Appl. Energy 290, 116727 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  22. Mulazzani, A., Eleftheriadis, P. & Leva, S. Recycling c-Si PV modules: A review, a proposed energy model and a manufacturing comparison. Energies 15, 8419 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  23. Energy Information Administration. International Energy Outlook, 2023. https://www.eia.gov/outlooks/ieo/data.php (2024).

  24. Verband Deutscher Maschinen Und Anlagenbau (VDMA). International Technology Roadmap for Photovoltaics (ITRPV), 15th Edition. 2024. https://www.vdma.org/international-technology-roadmap-photovoltaic (2025).

  25. Intergovernmental Panel On Climate Change (IPCC). Emissions Trends and Drivers in Climate Change 2022 - Mitigation of Climate Change: Working Group III Contribution to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. 215–294 (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 2023).

  26. International Energy Agency (IEA). Renewables 2024. https://www.iea.org/reports/renewables-2024 (2025).

  27. Fthenakis. V. et al. Methodology guidelines on life cycle assessment of photovoltaic electricity. International Energy Agency (IEA) Photovoltaic Power Systems (PVPS) Programme Task 12. https://iea-pvps.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/01/rep12_11.pdf (2011).

  28. Weber, T., Stocks, R., Blakers, A., Nadolny, A. & Cheng, C. A global atlas of pumped hydro systems that repurpose existing mining sites. Renew. Energy 224, 120113 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  29. Yoon, M. Y., Yeom, H. J., Jeong, J.-R., Lee, H. C. & Kim, J.-H. Effect of SiH4 fragments and H radicals on nc-Si: H film deposition in an inductively coupled plasma PECVD. Surf. Interfaces 60, 106040 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  30. Global Solar Council. Solar Purchasers and Policy Makers https://globalelectronicscouncil.org/epeat-for-solar/solar-purchasers-and-policy-makers/ (2025).

  31. European Union. The Use of the Environmental Footprint Methods to Measure and Communicate the Life Cycle Environmental Performance of Products and Organisations. 2021. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/reco/2021/2279/oj (2025).

  32. European Commission. Developer Environmental Footprint (EF) https://eplca.jrc.ec.europa.eu/LCDN/developerEF.html (2025).

  33. Grant, C. A. & Hicks, A. L. Effect of manufacturing and installation location on environmental impact payback time of solar power. Clean. Technol. Environ. 22, 187–196 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  34. Shiradkar, N. et al. Recent developments in solar manufacturing in India. Sol. Compass 1, 100009 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  35. Energy Information Administration (EIA). International Energy Outlook Narrative. 2023. https://www.eia.gov/outlooks/ieo/pdf/IEO2023_Narrative.pdf. (2024).

  36. SP Global Commodity Insights. P. V. Module Supply Chain Tracker. ed, 2024.

  37. Maka, A. O., Ghalut, T. & Elsaye, E. The pathway toward decarbonisation and net-zero emissions by 2050: The role of solar energy technology. GTS 2, 100107 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  38. Frischknecht, R. et al. Life Cycle Inventories and Life Cycle Assessment of Photovoltaic Systems. Int. Energy Agency (IEA) PVPS Task. 12, Rep. T12-19, 2020 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  39. Blakesley, J. C. et al. Roadmap on established and emerging photovoltaics for sustainable energy conversion. J. Phys. Energy 6, 041501 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  40. Stefani, B. V. et al. Historical market projections and the future of silicon solar cells. Joule 7, 2684–2699 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors gratefully acknowledge financial support for this research from the Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council in the UK through grants EP/S023836/1 (B.L.W. EPSRC Centre for Doctoral Training in Renewable Energy Northeast Universities) and EP/W010062/1 (O.M.R., N.S.B., EPSRC Reimagining Photovoltaics Manufacturing). The work was also supported by the EPSRC Charged Oxide Inversion Layer (COIL) solar cells project (EP/V037749/1 and EP/V038605/1). S.L.P. is supported by a Royal Academy of Engineering Research Fellowship RF-2324-123-197. The authors gratefully acknowledge useful discussions with Prof Caroline Sablayrolles and Dr Claire Vialle in relation to life cycle assessment, as well as Kyle Affleck for their valuable contribution towards uncertainty and sensitivity analysis.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Engineering, Physics and Mathematics, Northumbria University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK

    Bethany L. Willis, Oliver M. Rigby & Neil S. Beattie

  2. School of Engineering, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK

    Sophie L. Pain, Nicholas E. Grant & John D. Murphy

  3. School of Engineering, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham, UK

    John D. Murphy

  4. Department of Materials, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK

    Ruy S. Bonilla

Authors
  1. Bethany L. Willis
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Oliver M. Rigby
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Sophie L. Pain
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Nicholas E. Grant
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  5. John D. Murphy
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Ruy S. Bonilla
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Neil S. Beattie
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

B.L.W., O.M.R., and N.S.B. conceived and designed the research. B.L.W. and O.M.R. performed the life cycle assessment, analysis and interpretation under the supervision of N.S.B. S.L.P., N.E.G., J.D.M., and R.S.B. supported the analysis and steered the direction of the investigation. S.L.P., N.E.G., J.D.M. and R.S.B. provided technical insights relating to silicon photovoltaics and R.S.B. facilitated data collection relating to tunnel oxide passivating contact solar cells. B.L.W., O.M.R., N.S.B. prepared the manuscript and revised submission; B.L.W, O.M.R, S.L.P, N.E.G, J.D.M, R.S.B, and N.S.B reviewed and commented on the manuscript and the revision.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Neil S. Beattie.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Peer review

Peer review information

Nature Communications thanks the anonymous reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work. A peer review file is available”.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Information

Descriptions of Additional Supplementary Files

Supplementary Data 1-6

Transparent Peer Review file

Source data

Source data

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Willis, B.L., Rigby, O.M., Pain, S.L. et al. Maximising environmental savings from silicon photovoltaics manufacturing to 2035. Nat Commun (2026). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-026-69165-x

Download citation

  • Received: 18 February 2025

  • Accepted: 26 January 2026

  • Published: 03 February 2026

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-026-69165-x

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

Download PDF

Advertisement

Explore content

  • Research articles
  • Reviews & Analysis
  • News & Comment
  • Videos
  • Collections
  • Subjects
  • Follow us on Facebook
  • Follow us on Twitter
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed

About the journal

  • Aims & Scope
  • Editors
  • Journal Information
  • Open Access Fees and Funding
  • Calls for Papers
  • Editorial Values Statement
  • Journal Metrics
  • Editors' Highlights
  • Contact
  • Editorial policies
  • Top Articles

Publish with us

  • For authors
  • For Reviewers
  • Language editing services
  • Open access funding
  • Submit manuscript

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

  • Explore articles by subject
  • Find a job
  • Guide to authors
  • Editorial policies

Nature Communications (Nat Commun)

ISSN 2041-1723 (online)

nature.com sitemap

About Nature Portfolio

  • About us
  • Press releases
  • Press office
  • Contact us

Discover content

  • Journals A-Z
  • Articles by subject
  • protocols.io
  • Nature Index

Publishing policies

  • Nature portfolio policies
  • Open access

Author & Researcher services

  • Reprints & permissions
  • Research data
  • Language editing
  • Scientific editing
  • Nature Masterclasses
  • Research Solutions

Libraries & institutions

  • Librarian service & tools
  • Librarian portal
  • Open research
  • Recommend to library

Advertising & partnerships

  • Advertising
  • Partnerships & Services
  • Media kits
  • Branded content

Professional development

  • Nature Awards
  • Nature Careers
  • Nature Conferences

Regional websites

  • Nature Africa
  • Nature China
  • Nature India
  • Nature Japan
  • Nature Middle East
  • Privacy Policy
  • Use of cookies
  • Legal notice
  • Accessibility statement
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Your US state privacy rights
Springer Nature

© 2026 Springer Nature Limited

Nature Briefing Anthropocene

Sign up for the Nature Briefing: Anthropocene newsletter — what matters in anthropocene research, free to your inbox weekly.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing: Anthropocene