Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Advertisement

Nature Communications
  • View all journals
  • Search
  • My Account Login
  • Content Explore content
  • About the journal
  • Publish with us
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed
  1. nature
  2. nature communications
  3. articles
  4. article
Earthquake dynamics sustained by seismic CO2
Download PDF
Download PDF
  • Article
  • Open access
  • Published: 14 February 2026

Earthquake dynamics sustained by seismic CO2

  • Manuel Curzi  ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0002-3430-25121,
  • Andrea Billi  ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0002-6368-18732,
  • Luca Aldega  ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0002-4665-13731,
  • Ilaria Baneschi3,
  • Chiara Boschi  ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0001-8972-44323,
  • Antonio Caracausi  ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0003-2510-28904,
  • Andrea Cavallo5,
  • Giovanni Ruggieri  ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0002-1188-19966 &
  • …
  • Eugenio Carminati1 

Nature Communications , Article number:  (2026) Cite this article

We are providing an unedited version of this manuscript to give early access to its findings. Before final publication, the manuscript will undergo further editing. Please note there may be errors present which affect the content, and all legal disclaimers apply.

Subjects

  • Geology
  • Seismology
  • Structural geology

Abstract

Seismic faults paradoxically combine high frictional strength, which promotes stress accumulation and should hinder slip, with large seismic displacements. Among proposed dynamic weakening mechanisms, shear heating is crucial because it triggers decarbonation and CO₂ production. In carbonate faults, this process generates transient CO₂ pressurization that can modulate rupture dynamics and promote supershear propagation, yet the amount and pressure of produced CO₂ remain poorly quantified. We investigate carbonate faults in the Apennines, Italy, a region affected by Mw≤7.1 earthquakes. Integrating nano-scale observations of fault surfaces with mineralogical and isotopic constraints, we develop a stoichiometric-thermodynamic model linking seismic decarbonation to Mw 5.9–6.5 earthquakes. Individual events can produce up to 12 tons of CO₂, generating quasi-lithostatic pressures ( ~ 196 MPa) under undrained confinement and supra-hydrostatic pressures (76–134 MPa) under drained conditions. Here, we conclude that seismic CO₂ pressurization can sustain dynamic slip and enhance the destructive potential of earthquakes in carbonate terrains.

Similar content being viewed by others

Physics-based broadband characterization of weak earthquakes

Article Open access 08 December 2025

Dynamics, interactions and delays of the 2019 Ridgecrest rupture sequence

Article 24 May 2023

Application of CO₂ fracturing blasting in mountain tunnel construction adjacent to existing structures

Article Open access 18 December 2025

Data availability

All data used in this work are available in the Supplementary Information (Supplementary Figs. 1–8 and Supplementary Tables 1–7) and in a public data repository (https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.31007884). All the figures have been edited with Adobe Illustrator (https://www.adobe.com/produ cts/illustrator.html). Historical and instrumental seismological data of earthquakes in the Apennines (Figs. 5, 6, Supplementary Fig. 1, and Supplementary Table 4) are from the catalogs of Istituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia, INGV, freely available at https://emidius.mi.ingv.it/CPTI15-DBMI15/ and https://terremoti.ingv.it/en/tdmt, respectively. The elevation data used for the Supplementary Fig. 1 was obtained from the Open Digital Elevation Model (OpenDEM) freely available at https://www.opendem.info/archiv_2020.html. Pressure computation applying the Span and Wagner’s equation of state was performed using the open source LONER18 software available at https://fluids.unileoben.ac.at/Computer.html. Pressure computation applying the Peng-Robinson’s equation of state was performed using the WolframAlpha online resource available at https://www.wolframalpha.com/input?i=Peng-Robinson+equation+of+state. Pressure computation applying the Famin et al.21 approach was performed using a Python code provided in the supplementary information. Masses of CO2 shown in Fig. 5 (A to G) are reported in the Supplementary Table 3. Correspondence and requests for materials should be addressed to Manuel Curzi, although all data are publicly available online (https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.28562510) and in the Supplementary Information.

Code availability

The Python code used to calculate CO2 pressure under drained conditions (which requires prior installation of the NumPy, Matplotlib, and SciPy libraries) is provided as text in the Supplementary Information.

References

  1. Wibberley, C. A. & Shimamoto, T. Earthquake slip weakening and asperities explained by thermal pressurization. Nature 436, 689–692 (2005).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Di Toro, G. et al. Fault lubrication during earthquakes. Nature 471, 494–498 (2011).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Viesca, R. C. & Garagash, D. I. Ubiquitous weakening of faults due to thermal pressurization. Nat. Geosci. 8, 875–879 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Kurzawski, R. M. et al. Earthquake nucleation in weak subducted carbonates. Nat. Geosci. 9, 717–722 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Rattez, H. & Veveakis, M. Weak phases production and heat generation control fault friction during seismic slip. Nat. Commun. 11, 350 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Dong, P. et al. Laboratory earthquakes decipher control and stability of rupture speeds. Nat. Commun. 14, 2427 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Han, R. et al. Ultralow friction of carbonate faults caused by thermal decomposition. Science 316, 878–881 (2007).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Sulem, J. & Famin, V. Thermal decomposition of carbonates in fault zones: slip-weakening and temperature-limiting effects. J. Geophys. Res. 114, B03309 (2009).

  9. Brantut, N. et al. Thermochemical pressurization of faults during coseismic slip. J. Geophys. Res. 115, B05314 (2010).

    Google Scholar 

  10. De Paola, N. et al. The geochemical signature caused by earthquake propagation in carbonate-hosted faults. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 310, 225–232 (2011).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Rubino, V. et al. Understanding dynamic friction through spontaneously evolving laboratory earthquakes. Nat. Commun. 8, 15991 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  12. Passelègue, F. X. et al. From fault creep to slow and fast earthquakes in carbonates. Geology 47, 744–748 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  13. Ohl, M. et al. Mechanisms of fault mirror formation and fault healing in carbonate rocks. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 530, 115886 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  14. Kim, H. N. Seismic fault weakening via CO2 pressurization enhanced by mechanical deformation of dolomite fault gouges. Geology 49, 1245–1249 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  15. Rubino, V. et al. Intermittent lab earthquakes in dynamically weakening fault gouge. Nature 606, 922–929 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  16. Aretusini, S. et al. Mechanical energy dissipation during seismic dynamic weakening in calcite-bearing faults. J. Geophys. Res. 129, e2024JB028927 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  17. Rice, J. R. Heating and weakening of faults during earthquake slip. J. Geophys. Res. 111, B05311 (2006).

  18. Goldsby, D. L. & Tullis, T. E. Flash heating leads to low frictional strength of crustal rocks at earthquake slip rates. Science 334, 216–218 (2011).

    Google Scholar 

  19. Ortega-Arroyo, D. et al. “Lab-Quakes”: quantifying the complete energy budget of high-pressure laboratory failure. AGU Adv. 6, e2025AV001683 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  20. Violay, M. et al. Pore fluid in experimental calcite-bearing faults: abrupt weakening and geochemical signature of co-seismic processes. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 361, 74–84 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  21. Famin, V. et al. Earthquakes produce carbon dioxide in crustal faults. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett 265, 487–497 (2008).

    Google Scholar 

  22. Samtani, M. et al. Comparison of dolomite decomposition kinetics with related carbonates and the effect of procedural variables on its kinetic parameters. Thermochim. Acta 392, 135–145 (2002).

    Google Scholar 

  23. Delle Piane, C. et al. Carbonate hosted fault rocks: a review of structural and microstructural characteristic with implications for seismicity in the upper crust. J. Struct. Geol. 103, 17–36 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  24. Sibson, R. H. Interactions between temperature and pore-fluid pressure during earthquake faulting and a mechanism for partial or total stress relief. Nat. Phys. Sci. 243, 66–68 (1973).

    Google Scholar 

  25. Miller, S. A. et al. Aftershocks driven by a high-pressure CO2 source at depth. Nature 427, 724–727 (2004).

    Google Scholar 

  26. Collettini, C. et al. Thermal decomposition along natural carbonate faults during earthquakes. Geology 41, 927–930 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  27. Collettini, C. et al. Fault structure and slip localization in carbonate-bearing normal faults: an example from the Northern Apennines of Italy. J. Struct. Geol. 67, 154–166 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  28. Smith, S. A. et al. Principal slip zones in limestone: microstructural characterization and implications for the seismic cycle (Tre Monti Fault, Central Apennines, Italy). Pure Appl. Geophys. 168, 2365–2393 (2011).

    Google Scholar 

  29. Rowe, C. D. & Griffith, W. A. Do faults preserve a record of seismic slip: a second opinion. J. Struct. Geol. 78, 1–26 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  30. Smeraglia, L. et al. Crustal-scale fluid circulation and co-seismic shallow comb-veining along the longest normal fault of the central Apennines, Italy. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 498, 152–168 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  31. Rowe, C. D. et al. Signature of coseismic decarbonation in dolomitic fault rocks of the Naukluft Thrust, Namibia. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 333, 200–210 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  32. Carpenter, B. M. et al. Influence of calcite decarbonation on the frictional behavior of carbonate-bearing gouge: implications for the instability of volcanic flanks and fault slip. Tectonophysics 658, 128–136 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  33. Aretusini, S. et al. Fast and localized temperature measurements during simulated earthquakes in carbonate rocks. Geophys. Res. Lett. 48, e2020GL091856 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  34. Cornelio, C. et al. Multiple seismic slip-rate pulses and mechanical and textural evolution of calcite-bearing fault gouges. J. Geophys. Res. 129, e2024JB029099 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  35. Sharp, Z. D. et al. The effect of thermal decarbonation on stable isotope compositions of carbonates. Am. Mineral. 88, 87–92 (2003).

    Google Scholar 

  36. Baldermann, A. et al. Fracture dolomite as an archive of continental palaeo-environmental conditions. Commun. Earth Environ. 1, 35 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  37. Sharp, Z. Principles of Stable Isotope Geochemistry: Nitrogen. (Pearson Prentice Hal, Upper Saddle River, 2017).

  38. Curzi, M. et al. Fossil chemical-physical (dis)equilibria between paleofluids and host rocks and their relationship to the seismic cycle and earthquakes. Earth 254, 104801 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  39. Coppola, M. et al. Meso- to nano-scale evidence of fluid-assisted co-seismic slip along the normal Mt. Morrone Fault, Italy: implications for earthquake hydrogeochemical precursors. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 568, 117010 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  40. Delle Piane, C. et al. Reaction-induced strain localization: torsion experiments on dolomite. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 256, 36–46 (2007).

    Google Scholar 

  41. Rossetti, F. et al. Patterns of fluid flow in the contact aureole of the Late Miocene Monte Capanne pluton (Elba Island, Italy): the role of structures and rheology. Contrib. Mineral. Petrol. 153, 743–760 (2007).

    Google Scholar 

  42. Han, R. et al. Strong velocity weakening and powder lubrication of simulated carbonate faults at seismic slip rates. J. Geophys. Res. Solid Earth 115, B03412 (2010).

  43. D’Agostino, N. et al. Space-time distribution of afterslip following the 2009 L’Aquila earthquake. J. Geophys. Res. 117, B02402 (2012).

  44. Tinti, E. et al. Slip heterogeneity and directivity of the ML 6.0, 2016, Amatrice earthquake estimated with rapid finite-fault inversion. Geophys. Res. Lett. 43, 10–745 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  45. Chiaraluce, L. et al. The 2016 central Italy seismic sequence: a first look at the mainshocks, aftershocks, and source models. Seismol. Res. Lett. 88, 757–771 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  46. Wells, D. L. & Coppersmith, K. J. New empirical relationships among magnitude, rupture length, rupture width, rupture area, and surface displacement. Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 84, 974–1002 (1994).

    Google Scholar 

  47. Faulkner, D. et al. Pore fluid pressure development in compacting fault gouge in theory, experiments, and nature. J. Geophys. Res. Solid Earth 123, 226–241 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  48. Affinito, R. et al. Rate and pressure dependence of dilatancy and fault strength in partially-drained laboratory fault zones. J. Geophys. Res. Solid Earth 130, e2024JB030596 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  49. Spagnuolo, E. et al. Fast-moving dislocations trigger flash weakening in carbonate-bearing faults during earthquakes. Sci. Rep. 5, 16112 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  50. Sulem, J. Coupled thermo-hydro-mechanical processes in fault zones during rapid slip. Rock Mechanics in Civil and Environmental Engineering, EUROCK 2010, June 2010, Lausanne, Switzerland. pp 15–25. ffhal-00562457 (2010).

  51. Billi, A. et al. Dolostone pulverization induced by coseismic rapid decompression of CO2-rich gas in nature (Matese, Apennines, Italy). Earth Plan. Sci. Lett. 604, 117996 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  52. Peng, D. Y. & Robinson, D. B. A new two-constant equation of state. Ind. Eng. Chem. Fundam. 15, 59–64 (1976).

    Google Scholar 

  53. Span, R. & Wagner, W. A new equation of state for carbon dioxide covering the fluid region from the triple-point temperature to 1100 K at pressures up to 800 MPa. J. Phys. Chem. Ref. Data 25, 1509–1596 (1996).

    Google Scholar 

  54. Saxena, S. K. & Fei, Y. Fluids at crustal pressures and temperatures: I. Pure species. Contrib. Mineral. Petrol. 95, 370–375 (1987).

    Google Scholar 

  55. Chiodini, G. et al. Correlation between tectonic CO2 Earth degassing and seismicity is revealed by a 10-year record in the Apennines, Italy. Sci. Adv. 6, eabc2938 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  56. Wang, S. et al. Rapid decompression and desorption induced energetic failure in coal. JRMGE 7, 345–350 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  57. Hubbert, M. & Rubey, W. W. Role of fluid pressure in mechanics of overthrust faulting: I. Mechanics of fluid-filled porous solids and its application to overthrust faulting. GSA Bull. 70, 115–166 (1959).

    Google Scholar 

  58. Sibson, R. H. Implications of fault-valve behaviour for rupture nucleation and recurrence. Tectonophysics 211, 283–293 (1992).

    Google Scholar 

  59. Sibson, R. H. Crustal stress, faulting and fluid flow. Geol. Soc. Lond. Spec. Publ. 78, 69–84 (1994).

    Google Scholar 

  60. Zamani, N. et al. Unraveling carbonate fault dynamics, from friction to decarbonation, through the 1959 Mw 7.2 earthquake in Montana. Sci. Rep. 15, 8625 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  61. Zamani, N. et al. Record of seismic slip in carbonates: Insights from the Venere Fault during the 1915 Avezzano earthquake (Mw 7.0), Central Italy. J. Struct. Geol. 197, 105421 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  62. Fellin, M. G. et al. Transition from slab roll-back to slab break-off in the central Apennines, Italy: Constraints from the stratigraphic and thermochronologic record. GSA Bull. 134, 1916–1930 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  63. Doebelin, N. & Kleeberg, R. Profex: a graphical user interface for the Rietveld refinement program BGMN. J. Appl. Crystallogr. 48, 1573–1580 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  64. Demurtas, M. et al. Frictional properties and microstructural evolution of dry and wet calcite–dolomite gouges. Solid Earth 12, 595–612 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  65. Böttcher, N. et al. Comparison of equations of state for carbon dioxide for numerical simulations. IAHS Publ 355, 252–260 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  66. Oleksak, R. P. & Rouillard, F. Materials performance in CO2 and supercritical CO2. Compr. Nucl. Mater. 4, 422–451 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  67. Bakker, R. J. Package FLUIDS 1. Computer programs for analysis of fluid inclusion data and for modelling bulk fluid properties. Chem. Geol. 194, 3–23 (2003).

    Google Scholar 

  68. Rodriguez-Navarro, C. et al. Thermal decomposition of calcite: mechanisms of formation and textural evolution of CaO nanocrystals. Am. Mineral. 94, 578–593 (2009).

    Google Scholar 

  69. Lemmon, E. W. et al. Thermophysical properties of fluid systems. In: (eds Linstrom, P. J., Mallard, W. G.) NIST Chemistry WebBook, NIST Standard Reference Database Number 69. (http://webbook.nist.gov) p 20899. (National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg MD, 2005).

Download references

Acknowledgements

This study was carried out within the RETURN Extended Partnership and received funding from the European Union Next-GenerationEU (National Recovery and Resilience Plan—NRRP, Mission 4, Component 2, Investment 1.3—D.D. 1243 2/8/2022, PE0000005). We thank M. Mercuri and F. Agosta for their support during sampling along the Mt. Capo di Serre Fault. We thank E. Spagnuolo and C. Marone for helpful discussions on experimental seismic faulting in carbonates.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Dipartimento di Scienze della Terra, Sapienza Università di Roma, Roma, Italy

    Manuel Curzi, Luca Aldega & Eugenio Carminati

  2. Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche, IGAG-CNR, Roma, Italy

    Andrea Billi

  3. Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche, IGG-CNR, Pisa, Italy

    Ilaria Baneschi & Chiara Boschi

  4. Istituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia, Palermo, Italy

    Antonio Caracausi

  5. Certema S.c.a.r.l., Borgo Santa Rita, Cinigiano, GR, Italy

    Andrea Cavallo

  6. Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche, IGG-CNR, Florence, Italy

    Giovanni Ruggieri

Authors
  1. Manuel Curzi
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Andrea Billi
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Luca Aldega
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Ilaria Baneschi
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Chiara Boschi
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Antonio Caracausi
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Andrea Cavallo
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Giovanni Ruggieri
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Eugenio Carminati
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

The study was conceived collaboratively by all authors. M.C., A.B., and E.C. leading the project. M.C., A.B., and E.C. conducted fieldwork and sampling. M.C., A.B., A. Cavallo, and E.C. performed optical and FESEM analyses. L.A. carried out the XRD analysis. C.B. and I.B. conducted stable isotope analyses. M.C. led the final modeling with contributions from all authors. C.B., I.B., A. Caracausi, and G.R. advised geochemical aspects of final modeling. M.C. processed preliminary and final images, integrating feedback from the team. M.C. and A.B. drafted the paper, incorporated feedback from all authors, and, with their input, finalized the text. E.C. secured project funding.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Manuel Curzi.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Peer review

Peer review information

Nature Communications thanks Vincent Famin, Nina Zamani, and Eric Ferré for their contribution to the peer review of this work. A peer review file is available.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Supplementary information

Transparent Peer Review file

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if you modified the licensed material. You do not have permission under this licence to share adapted material derived from this article or parts of it. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Curzi, M., Billi, A., Aldega, L. et al. Earthquake dynamics sustained by seismic CO2. Nat Commun (2026). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-026-69174-w

Download citation

  • Received: 10 April 2025

  • Accepted: 23 January 2026

  • Published: 14 February 2026

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-026-69174-w

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

Download PDF

Advertisement

Explore content

  • Research articles
  • Reviews & Analysis
  • News & Comment
  • Videos
  • Collections
  • Subjects
  • Follow us on Facebook
  • Follow us on X
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed

About the journal

  • Aims & Scope
  • Editors
  • Journal Information
  • Open Access Fees and Funding
  • Calls for Papers
  • Editorial Values Statement
  • Journal Metrics
  • Editors' Highlights
  • Contact
  • Editorial policies
  • Top Articles

Publish with us

  • For authors
  • For Reviewers
  • Language editing services
  • Open access funding
  • Submit manuscript

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

  • Explore articles by subject
  • Find a job
  • Guide to authors
  • Editorial policies

Nature Communications (Nat Commun)

ISSN 2041-1723 (online)

nature.com sitemap

About Nature Portfolio

  • About us
  • Press releases
  • Press office
  • Contact us

Discover content

  • Journals A-Z
  • Articles by subject
  • protocols.io
  • Nature Index

Publishing policies

  • Nature portfolio policies
  • Open access

Author & Researcher services

  • Reprints & permissions
  • Research data
  • Language editing
  • Scientific editing
  • Nature Masterclasses
  • Research Solutions

Libraries & institutions

  • Librarian service & tools
  • Librarian portal
  • Open research
  • Recommend to library

Advertising & partnerships

  • Advertising
  • Partnerships & Services
  • Media kits
  • Branded content

Professional development

  • Nature Awards
  • Nature Careers
  • Nature Conferences

Regional websites

  • Nature Africa
  • Nature China
  • Nature India
  • Nature Japan
  • Nature Middle East
  • Privacy Policy
  • Use of cookies
  • Legal notice
  • Accessibility statement
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Your US state privacy rights
Springer Nature

© 2026 Springer Nature Limited

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing