Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Advertisement

Nature Communications
  • View all journals
  • Search
  • My Account Login
  • Content Explore content
  • About the journal
  • Publish with us
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed
  1. nature
  2. nature communications
  3. articles
  4. article
Combining xQTL and genome-wide association studies from diverse populations improves druggable gene discovery
Download PDF
Download PDF
  • Article
  • Open access
  • Published: 14 February 2026

Combining xQTL and genome-wide association studies from diverse populations improves druggable gene discovery

  • Noah Lorincz-Comi1,2,
  • Wenqiang Song1,2,
  • Xin Chen1,2,
  • Isabela Rivera Paz1,2,
  • Yuan Hou1,2,
  • Yadi Zhou1,2,
  • Jielin Xu1,2,
  • William Martin  ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0003-0616-04621,2,
  • John Barnard  ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0003-2403-82683,
  • Andrew A. Pieper4,5,6,7,8,9,
  • Jonathan L. Haines  ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0002-4351-472810,
  • Mina K. Chung11,12,13 &
  • …
  • Feixiong Cheng  ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0002-1736-28471,2,13 

Nature Communications , Article number:  (2026) Cite this article

We are providing an unedited version of this manuscript to give early access to its findings. Before final publication, the manuscript will undergo further editing. Please note there may be errors present which affect the content, and all legal disclaimers apply.

Subjects

  • Genome informatics
  • Genome-wide association studies
  • Quantitative trait

Abstract

Repurposing existing medicines to target disease-associated genes represents a promising strategy for developing effective treatments for complex diseases. However, progress has been hindered by a lack of viable candidate drug targets identified through genome-wide association studies. Gene-based association tests provide a more powerful alternative to traditional SNP-based methods, yet current approaches often fail to leverage shared heritability across populations and to effectively integrate functional genomic data. To address these challenges, we develop GenT and its various extensions, comprising a framework of gene-based tests utilizing summary-level data from genome-wide association studies. Using GenT, we identify 16, 15, 35, and 83 candidate genes linked to Alzheimer’s disease, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, major depression, and schizophrenia, respectively, not detected by Genome-Wide Association Studies (GWAS). Additionally, we use our multi-ancestry gene-based test (MuGenT) to identify 28 candidate genes associated with type 2 diabetes. By integrating brain expression and protein quantitative trait loci into our analysis, we identify 43 candidate genes associated with Alzheimer’s disease that have supporting xQTL evidence. We also perform experimental assays to demonstrate that the NTRK1 inhibitor GW441756 significantly reduces tau hyper-phosphorylation (including p-tau181 and p-tau217) in Alzheimer’s disease patient-derived iPSC neurons, providing mechanistic support for our predictions.

Data availability

Supporting Data are available from Zenodo [https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18121206]. We provided gene-based association test results from GenT for AD, ALS, MDD, SCZ in Supporting Data 1-4; multi-ancestry gene-based association testing with MuGenT for T2D in Supporting Data 5; gene-based population heterogeneity testing with MuGenT-PH for T2D in Supporting Data 6; brain eQTL- and pQTL-integrated gene-based association testing for AD in Supporting Data 7 and 8, respectively; and all fine-mapped SNPs for AD, ALS, MDD, SCZ, and all T2D populations in Supporting Data 9−17. We created a web application (https://nlorinczcomi.shinyapps.io/gent/) to interactively query and download all gene-based association test and fine-mapping results with GenT and SuSiE for the 32 phenotypes listed in Supporting Data 18. Fine-mapped GenT results for five complex diseases are provided in Supporting Data 19-23. In our main analyses, GWAS summary statistics were downloaded from public repositories. AD GWAS summary statistics are under accession code GCST90027158; GWAS summary statistics for SCZ are available on Figshare [https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.19426775]; GWAS summary statistics for ALS are available under accession code GCST90027164; GWAS summary statistics for MDD are available on https://datashare.ed.ac.uk/handle/10283/3203; GWAS summary statistics for T2D are available from https://www.diagram-consortium.org/downloads.html (accession label: “Multi-ancestry GWAS meta-analysis summary statistics”). All other repositories from which we downloaded GWAS summary statistics for phenotypes whose GenT results are presented at (https://nlorinczcomi.shinyapps.io/gent/) are available in Supporting Data 18. GWAS summary statistics for xQTL in cortex, cerebellum, frontal cortex, hippocampus, and spinal cord tissues were downloaded from the ‘eQTL Tissue-Specific All SNP Gene Associations’ section of (https://gtexportal.org/home/downloads/adult-gtex/qtl) (v8). ROSMAP data are available at the AD Knowledge portal under restricted access: https://adknowledgeportal.synapse.org. Supplementary Figs. 1–33 provide additional simulation and real data analysis examples to further demonstrate and evaluate the performance of our gene-based testing approaches. Supplementary Figs. 34–37 provide additional diagnostic results for MuGenT testing in T2D. Supplementary Figs. 38–51 display locus-specific plots for a set of genes which were significant in xGenT testing with AD. Supplementary Figs. 52–68 display their local genetic correlations across multiple phenotypes and GTEx v8 tissues, and Supplementary Figs. 69–84 display the distributions of their eQTL effect sizes across all GTEx tissues. Supplementary Fig. 85 demonstrates between-ancestry heterogeneity of LD patterns in the KIF11 locus. Supplementary Fig. 86 displays a cross-tissue network of local genetic correlations in the RIPK2 locus. Supplementary Fig. 87 shows cell-type specific expression of three candidate AD-associated genes using ROSMAP data and identified with xGenT, and Supplementary Fig. 88 shows a set of protein-protein interactions involving NTRK1. Source Data are provided with this article. Source data are provided with this paper.

Code availability

All code used to generate our simulation and real data analysis results is available at (https://github.com/noahlorinczcomi/gent_analysis) and is deposited in Zenodo [https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17449888]. We have created an R package for researchers to apply GenT, MuGenT, MuGenT-PH, MuGenT-Pleio, MuGenT-Sel, and xGenT to their own data which is available from (https://github.com/noahlorinczcomi/gent), where tutorials are available. The R package we used for data analysis is available from Zenodo [https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17449854]. We made all summary gene-based association testing and fine-mapping results from analyses from 32 phenotypes available for query and download from (https://nlorinczcomi.shinyapps.io/gent).

References

  1. Claussnitzer, M. et al. A brief history of human disease genetics. Nature 577, 179–189 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Uffelmann, E. et al. Genome-wide association studies. Nat. Rev. Meth. Prim. 1, 59 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Tam, V. et al. Benefits and limitations of genome-wide association studies. Nat. Rev. Genet. 20, 467–484 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Gusev, A. et al. Integrative approaches for large-scale transcriptome-wide association studies. Nat. Genet. 48, 245–252 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Zhu, Z. et al. Integration of summary data from GWAS and eQTL studies predicts complex trait gene targets. Nat. Genet. 48, 481–487 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Farh, K. K. H. et al. Genetic and epigenetic fine mapping of causal autoimmune disease variants. Nature 518, 337–343 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Reay, W. R. et al. Advancing the use of genome-wide association studies for drug repurposing. Nat. Rev. Genet. 22, 658–671 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Lago, S. G. et al. The druggable schizophrenia genome: from repurposing opportunities to unexplored drug targets. NPJ Gen. Med. 7, 25 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Qi, H. et al. New “drugs and targets” in the GWAS era of bipolar disorder. Bipolar Disord. 25, 410–421 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Huang, H. et al. Gene-based tests of association. PLoS Genet 7, e1002177 (2011).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Lamparter, D. et al. Fast and rigorous computation of gene and pathway scores from SNP-based summary statistics. PLoS Comput. Biol. 12, e1004714 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  12. de Leeuw, C. A. et al. MAGMA: generalized gene-set analysis of GWAS data. PLoS Comput. Biol. 11, e1004219 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  13. Vsevolozhskaya, O. A. et al. DOT: Gene-set analysis by combining decorrelated association statistics. PLoS Comput. Biol. 16, e1007819 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  14. Liu, J. Z. et al. A versatile gene-based test for genome-wide association studies. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 87, 139–145 (2010).

    Google Scholar 

  15. Berrandou, T. E. et al. LDAK-GBAT: fast and powerful gene-based association testing using summary statistics. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 110, 23–29 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  16. Zhang, W. et al. Partitioning gene-based variance of complex traits by gene score regression. PLoS One 15, e0237657 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  17. Hof, J. P. et al. LDAK-KVIK performs fast and powerful mixed-model association analysis of quantitative and binary phenotypes. Nat. Genet 57, 2116–2123 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  18. Hecker, J. et al. Reporting correct p values in VEGAS analyses. Twin Res. Hum. Genet. 20, 257–259 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  19. Yurko, R. et al. H-MAGMA, inheriting a shaky statistical foundation, yields excess false positives. Ann. Hum. Genet. 85, 97–100 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  20. Barbeira, A. N. et al. Exploring the phenotypic consequences of tissue specific gene expression variation inferred from GWAS summary statistics. Nat. Comms. 9, 1825 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  21. Gerring, Z. F. et al. A gene co-expression network-based analysis of multiple brain tissues reveals novel genes and molecular pathways underlying major depression. PLoS Genet 15, e1008245 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  22. Gkatzionis, A. et al. Statistical methods for cis-Mendelian randomization with two-sample summary-level data. Genet. Epidemiol. 47, 3–25 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  23. 1000 Genomes Project Consortium. A global reference for human genetic variation. Nature. 526, 68 (2015).

  24. Gaulton, A. et al. The ChEMBL database in 2017. NAR 45, D945–D954 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  25. Gilson, M. K. et al. BindingDB in 2015: a public database for medicinal chemistry, computational chemistry and systems pharmacology. Nucleic Acids Res 44, D1045–D1053 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  26. Harding, S. D. et al. The IUPHAR/BPS guide to PHARMACOLOGY in 2022: curating pharmacology for COVID−19, malaria and antibacterials. Nucleic Acids Res 50, D1282–D1294 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  27. Wishart, D. S. et al. DrugBank 5.0: a major update to the DrugBank database for 2018. Nucleic Acids Res 46, D1074–D1082 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  28. Zou, Y. et al. Fine-mapping from summary data with the “Sum of Single Effects” model. PLoS Genet 18, e1010299 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  29. Kosoy, R. et al. Genetics of the human microglia regulome refines Alzheimer’s disease risk loci. Nat. Genet. 54, 1145–1154 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  30. Phan, K. et al. Multiple pathways of lipid dysregulation in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Brain Comms 5, 340 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  31. Zhen, L. et al. EphB2 deficiency induces depression-like behaviors and memory impairment: involvement of NMDA 2B receptor dependent signaling. Front. Pharmacol. 9, 862 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  32. Choi, S. J. et al. A schizophrenia-related deletion leads to KCNQ2-dependent abnormal dopaminergic modulation of prefrontal cortical interneuron activity. Cereb. Cortex. 28, 2175–2191 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  33. Brown, B. C. et al. Transethnic genetic-correlation estimates from summary statistics. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 99, 76–88 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  34. Ortiz, R. et al. Type 2 diabetes and cardiometabolic risk may be associated with increase in DNA methylation of FKBP5. Clin. Epigenet. 10, 1–8 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  35. Huang, Q. Y. et al. Cdc42: a novel regulator of insulin secretion and diabetes-associated diseases. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 20, 179 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  36. Bellenguez, C. et al. New insights into the genetic etiology of Alzheimer’s disease and related dementias. Nat. Genet. 54, 412–436 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  37. Bennett, D. A. et al. Religious orders study and rush memory and aging project. J. Alz. Dis. 64, S161–S189 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  38. Nagele, R. G. et al. Contribution of glial cells to the development of amyloid plaques in Alzheimer’s disease. Neurobiol. Aging 25, 663–674 (2004).

    Google Scholar 

  39. Uddin, M. S. et al. Glial cells in Alzheimer’s disease: from neuropathological changes to therapeutic implications. Ageing Res. Rev. 78, 101622 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  40. The UniProt Consortium. UniProt: the Universal Protein Knowledgebase in 2023. Nucleic Acids Res. 51, 523–531 (2023).

  41. Savas, J. N. et al. Amyloid accumulation drives proteome-wide alterations in mouse models of Alzheimer’s disease-like pathology. Cell Rep. 21, 2614–2627 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  42. Magistri, M. et al. Transcriptomics profiling of Alzheimer’s disease reveal neurovascular defects, altered amyloid-β homeostasis, and deregulated expression of long noncoding RNAs. J. Alzheimer’s. Dis. 48, 647–665 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  43. Zhou, Y. et al. AlzGPS: a genome-wide positioning systems platform to catalyze multi-omics for Alzheimer’s drug discovery. Alzheimer’s. Res. Ther. 13, 1–13 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  44. Liu, K. et al. Human peripheral blood-derived mesenchymal stem cells with NTRK1 over-expression enhance repairing capability in a rat model of Parkinson’s disease. Cytotech 70, 1291–1299 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  45. Cozza, A. et al. SNPs in neurotrophin system genes and Alzheimer’s disease in an Italian population. J. Alzheimer’s. Dis. 15, 61–70 (2008).

    Google Scholar 

  46. Hall, B. E. et al. Transcriptome analysis of rheumatoid arthritis uncovers genes linked to inflammation-induced pain. Sci. Rep. 14, 25893 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  47. de Frutos Lucas, J. et al. Investigating neurotrophin genetics and hippocampal volume. bioRxiv https://doi.org/10.1101/2022.01.01.474700 (2022).

  48. Yang, K. et al. NTRK1 knockdown induces mouse cognitive impairment and hippocampal neuronal damage through mitophagy suppression via inactivating the AMPK/ULK1/FUNDC1 pathway. Cell Death Discov. 9, 404–419 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  49. Raney, B. J. et al. The UCSC genome browser database: 2024 update. Nucleic Acids Res 52, 1082–1088 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  50. Maccioni, R. B. et al. The protein kinase cdk5: structural aspects, roles in neurogenesis and involvement in Alzheimer’s pathology. Eur. J. Biochem. 268, 1518–1527 (2001).

    Google Scholar 

  51. Liu, S. L. et al. The role of Cdk5 in Alzheimer’s disease. Mol. Neurobiol. 53, 4328–4342 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  52. Wehrman, T. et al. Structural and mechanistic insights into nerve growth factor interactions with the TrkA and p75 receptors. Neuron 53, 25–38 (2007).

    Google Scholar 

  53. Uhlén, M. et al. Tissue-based map of the human proteome. Science 347, 1260419 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  54. Sondka, Z. et al. The COSMIC Cancer Gene Census: describing genetic dysfunction across all human cancers. Nat. Rev. Cancers 18, 696–705 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  55. Indo, Y. Molecular basis of congenital insensitivity to pain with anhidrosis (CIPA): mutations and polymorphisms in TRKA (NTRK1) gene encoding the receptor tyrosine kinase for nerve growth factor. Hum. Mutat. 18, 462–471 (2001).

    Google Scholar 

  56. Sjöstedt, E. et al. An atlas of the protein-coding genes in the human, pig, and mouse brain. Science. 367, eaay5947 (2020).

  57. Wang, S. et al. TREM2 drives microglia response to amyloid-β via SYK-dependent and-independent pathways. Cell 185, 4153–4169 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  58. Hampel, H. et al. The amyloid-β pathway in Alzheimer’s disease. Mol. Psychiat. 26, 5481–5503 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  59. Davies, G. et al. Genetic contributions to variation in general cognitive function: a meta-analysis of genome-wide association studies in the CHARGE consortium (N= 53,949). Mol. Psychiat. 20, 183–192 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  60. Demenais, F. et al. Multiancestry association study identifies new asthma risk loci that colocalize with immune-cell enhancer marks. Nat. Genet. 50, 42–53 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  61. Allaire, P. et al. Genetic and clinical determinants of telomere length. HGG Advances. 4, 100201 (2023).

  62. Pickrell, J. K. et al. Detection and interpretation of shared genetic influences on 42 human traits. Nat. Genet. 48, 709–717 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  63. Sakaue, S. et al. A cross-population atlas of genetic associations for 220 human phenotypes. Nat. Genet. 53, 1415–1424 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  64. Richard, S. et al. Thyroid hormone action during GABAergic neuron maturation: The quest for mechanisms. Front. Endocrin. 14, 1–13 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  65. Jones, P. et al. Child developmental risk factors for adult schizophrenia in the British 1946 birth cohort. Lancet 344, 1398–1402 (1994).

    Google Scholar 

  66. Murray, R. M. et al. 30 years on: how the neurodevelopmental hypothesis of schizophrenia morphed into the developmental risk factor model of psychosis. Schiz. Bull. 43, 1190–1196 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  67. Janoutová, J. et al. Epidemiology and risk factors of schizophrenia. Neuroendo. Lett. 37, 1–8 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  68. Eyles, D. W. How do established developmental risk-factors for schizophrenia change the way the brain develops? Transl. Psychiat. 11, 158 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  69. Pereira, M. J. et al. FKBP5 expression in human adipose tissue increases following dexamethasone exposure and is associated with insulin resistance. Metabolism 63, 1198–1208 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  70. Sidibeh, C. O. et al. FKBP5 expression in human adipose tissue: potential role in glucose and lipid metabolism, adipogenesis and type 2 diabetes. Endocrine 62, 116–128 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  71. Agam, G. et al. The Role of FKBPs in Complex Disorders: Neuropsychiatric Diseases, Cancer, and Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus. Cells 13, 801 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  72. Nielsen, J. B. et al. Loss-of-function genomic variants highlight potential therapeutic targets for cardiovascular disease. Nat. Comms. 11, 6417 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  73. Warren, H. R. et al. Genome-wide association analysis identifies novel blood pressure loci and offers biological insights into cardiovascular risk. Nat. Genet. 49, 403–415 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  74. Saunders, G. R. et al. Genetic diversity fuels gene discovery for tobacco and alcohol use. Nature 612, 720–724 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  75. Leng, K. et al. CRISPRi screens in human iPSC-derived astrocytes elucidate regulators of distinct inflammatory reactive states. Nat. Neuro. 25, 1528–1542 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  76. Belongie, K. J. et al. Identification of novel biomarkers to monitor β-cell function and enable early detection of type 2 diabetes risk. PLoS One 12, e0182932 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  77. Kipp, A. et al. Glomeruli proteome analysis reveals early differences between pre-existing and de-novo type 2 diabetes in human renal allografts. Nephrol. Dial. Transplant. 36, 143–003 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  78. Alam, C. M. et al. M. Keratin 8 modulates β-cell stress responses and normoglycaemia. J. Cell Sci. 126, 5635–5644 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  79. Lopez-Ramirez, O. et al. The role of acid sensing ion channels in the cardiovascular function. Front. Physiol. 14, 1194948 (2023).

  80. Newberry, E. P. et al. Impaired hepatic very low-density lipoprotein secretion promotes tumorigenesis and is accelerated with Fabp1 deletion. Am. J. Pathol. 194, 958–974 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  81. Tian, R. et al. CRISPR interference-based platform for multimodal genetic screens in human iPSC-derived neurons. Neuron 104, 239–255 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  82. Gomez-Isla, T. et al. Connections and Cognitive Impairment In Alzheimer’s Disease. In Connections, cognition and Alzheimer’s disease. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 49–166 (1997).

  83. Heneka, M. T. et al. Neuroinflammation in Alzheimer’s disease. Lancet Neurol. 14, 388–405 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  84. Mendes, T. K. et al. Investigating the role of RIO protein kinases in Caenorhabditis elegans. PLoS One 10, e0117444 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  85. Kaur, D. et al. Activation of microglia and astrocytes: a roadway to neuroinflammation and Alzheimer’s disease. Inflammopharmacology 27, 663–677 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  86. Lorincz-Comi, N. J. et al. Bayesian inference of genetic pleiotropy identifies drug targets and repurposable medicines for human complex diseases. medRxiv https://doi.org/10.1101/2025.03.17.25324106 (2025).

  87. Chang, C. C. et al. Second-generation PLINK: rising to the challenge of larger and richer datasets. Gigascience 4, s13742–015 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  88. Trubetskoy, V. et al. Mapping genomic loci implicates genes and synaptic biology in schizophrenia. Nature 604, 502–508 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  89. Howard, D. M. et al. Genome-wide meta-analysis of depression identifies 102 independent variants and highlights the importance of the prefrontal brain regions. Nat. Neurosci. 22, 343–352 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  90. Van Rheenen, W. et al. Common and rare variant association analyses in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis identify 15 risk loci with distinct genetic architectures and neuron-specific biology. Nat. Genet. 53, 1636–1648 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  91. Suzuki, K. et al. Genetic drivers of heterogeneity in type 2 diabetes pathophysiology. Nature 627, 347–357 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  92. GTEx Consortium. The GTEx Consortium atlas of genetic regulatory effects across human tissues. Science 369, 1318–1330 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  93. Zhou, Y. et al. The Alzheimer’s Cell Atlas (TACA): A single-cell molecular map for translational therapeutics accelerator in Alzheimer’s disease. Alzheimer’s. Dement 8, e12350 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  94. Ochoa, D. et al. The next-generation Open Targets Platform: reimagined, redesigned, rebuilt. Nucleic Acids Res 51, D1353–D1359 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  95. Yang, J. J. et al. TIGA: target illumination GWAS analytics. Bioinformatics 37, 3865–3873 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  96. Piñero, J. et al. DisGeNET: a comprehensive platform integrating information on human disease-associated genes and variants. Nucleic Acids Res 45, D833–D839 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  97. Greenfest-Allen, E. et al. NIAGADS Alzheimer’s GenomicsDB: A resource for exploring Alzheimer’s disease genetic and genomic knowledge. Alzheimer’s. Dement 20, 1123–1136 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  98. Covo, S. et al. A novel single-gamma approximation to the sum of independent gamma variables, and a generalization to infinitely divisible distributions. Elec. J. Stat. 8, 894–926 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  99. Stewart, T. et al. A simple approximation to the convolution of gamma distributions. Cent. Discussion Pap. 70, 1–26 (2007).

    Google Scholar 

  100. Jiang, L. et al. Powerful and robust inference of complex phenotypes’ causal genes with dependent expression quantitative loci by a median-based Mendelian randomization. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 109, 838–856 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  101. Galwey, N. W. A new measure of the effective number of tests, a practical tool for comparing families of non-independent significance tests. Genet. Epidemiol. 33, 559–568 (2009).

    Google Scholar 

  102. Wang, G. et al. A simple new approach to variable selection in regression, with application to genetic fine mapping. JRSSB: Stat. Method. 82, 1273–1300 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  103. R Core Team. *R: A language and environment for statistical computing*. R Foundation for Statistical Computing. https://www.R-project.org/ (2023).

  104. Li, M. X. et al. GATES: a rapid and powerful gene-based association test using extended Simes procedure. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 88, 283–293 (2011).

    Google Scholar 

  105. Liu, Y. et al. ACAT: a fast and powerful p value combination method for rare-variant analysis in sequencing studies. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 104, 410–421 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  106. Lorincz-Comi, N. Exact set-based hypothesis testing of correlated normal statistics using a distributional equivalence in a high-dimensional space. https://github.com/noahlorinczcomi/exset (2025).

  107. Watanabe, K. et al. Functional mapping and annotation of genetic associations with FUMA. Nat. Comms. 8, 1826–1837 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  108. Lorincz-Comi, N. et al. MRBEE: A bias-corrected multivariable Mendelian randomization method. HGG Advances. 5, 100290 (2024).

  109. Kollo, T. et al. Advanced Multivariate Statistics With Matrices. Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands (2005).

  110. Yavorska, O. O. et al. MendelianRandomization: an R package for performing Mendelian randomization analyses using summarized data. Int. J. Epidemiol. 46, 1734–1739 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  111. Wood, E. R. et al. Discovery and in vitro evaluation of potent TrkA kinase inhibitors: oxindole and aza-oxindoles. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 14, 953–957 (2004).

    Google Scholar 

  112. Selleck Chemicals. GW441756, Catalog No. S2891. https://www.selleckchem.com/products/gw-441756.html#s_ref (2025).

  113. Parra Bravo, C. et al. Cellular and pathological functions of tau. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell. Biol. 25, 845–864 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  114. Gohel, D. et al. Sildenafil as a candidate drug for Alzheimer’s disease: real-world patient data observation and mechanistic observations from patient-induced pluripotent stem cell-derived neurons. J. Alzheimers Dis. 98, 643–657 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the National Institute on Aging (NIA) under Award Number U01AG073323, R01AG066707, R01AG084250, R01AG076448, R01AG082118, R01AG092462, R01AG092591, RF1AG082211, and R33AG083003, the National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NINDS) under Award Number RF1NS133812, National Institutes of Health (NIH) under Award Number 1OT2OD038083-01, the Alzheimer’s Association award (ALZDISCOVERY−1051936), the Alzheimer’s Drug Discovery Foundation (ADDF), and Dr. Keyhan and Dr. Jafar Mobasseri Endowed Chair for Innovative Research to F.C. This work was supported in part by the Rebecca E. Barchas, MD, Professorship in Translational Psychiatry, the Valor Foundation, Project 19PABH134580006-AHA/Allen Initiative in Brain Health and Cognitive Impairment, the Elizabeth Ring Mather & William Gwinn Mather Fund, S. Livingston Samuel Mather Trust, and the Louis Stokes VA Medical Center resources and facilities to A.A.P. This work was supported in part by National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI) under Award Number P01HL158501 to M.K.C. and F.C. This work was also supported by Global Center for Pathogen and Human Health Research Postdoc Fellowship.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Cleveland Clinic Genome Center, Cleveland Clinic Research, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA

    Noah Lorincz-Comi, Wenqiang Song, Xin Chen, Isabela Rivera Paz, Yuan Hou, Yadi Zhou, Jielin Xu, William Martin & Feixiong Cheng

  2. Department of Genomic Science and Systems Biology, Cleveland Clinic Research, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA

    Noah Lorincz-Comi, Wenqiang Song, Xin Chen, Isabela Rivera Paz, Yuan Hou, Yadi Zhou, Jielin Xu, William Martin & Feixiong Cheng

  3. Department of Quantitative Health Sciences, Cleveland Clinic Research, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA

    John Barnard

  4. Department of Psychiatry, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, USA

    Andrew A. Pieper

  5. Brain Health Medicines Center, Harrington Discovery Institute, University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, Cleveland, OH, USA

    Andrew A. Pieper

  6. Geriatric Psychiatry, GRECC, Louis Stokes Cleveland VA Medical Center, Cleveland, OH, USA

    Andrew A. Pieper

  7. Institute for Transformative Molecular Medicine, School of Medicine, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, USA

    Andrew A. Pieper

  8. Department of Pathology, Case Western Reserve University, School of Medicine, Cleveland, OH, 44106, USA

    Andrew A. Pieper

  9. Department of Neurosciences, Case Western Reserve University, School of Medicine, Cleveland, OH, 44106, USA

    Andrew A. Pieper

  10. Department of Population & Quantitative Health Sciences, Cleveland Institute for Computational Biology, Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, Ohio, USA

    Jonathan L. Haines

  11. Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Heart, Vascular & Thoracic Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA

    Mina K. Chung

  12. Department of Cardiovascular and Metabolic Sciences, Cleveland Clinic Research, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA

    Mina K. Chung

  13. Department of Molecular Medicine, Cleveland Clinic Lerner College of Medicine, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, USA

    Mina K. Chung & Feixiong Cheng

Authors
  1. Noah Lorincz-Comi
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Wenqiang Song
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Xin Chen
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Isabela Rivera Paz
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Yuan Hou
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Yadi Zhou
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Jielin Xu
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  8. William Martin
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  9. John Barnard
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  10. Andrew A. Pieper
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  11. Jonathan L. Haines
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  12. Mina K. Chung
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  13. Feixiong Cheng
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

N.L.C. and F.C. conceived the study design. N.L.C. developed the methodology, performed the formal analysis, and wrote the original draft. Y.Z., J.Z., and W.M. created a visualization. W.S., I.R.P., and X.C. performed experiments. F.C. supervised all activities, provided all resources, and reviewed and edited the manuscript. Y.H., A.P., J.B., J.H., and M.C. edited the manuscript. All authors approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Feixiong Cheng.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

All authors declare no competing financial and non-financial interests.

Peer review

Peer review information

Nature Communications thanks Junhao Wen, Chunyu Liu and the other anonymous reviewer for their contribution to the peer review of this work. A peer review file is available.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Information

Description of Additional Supplementary Files

Supporting Data 1-23

Reporting Summary

Transparent Peer Review file

Source data

Source Data

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if you modified the licensed material. You do not have permission under this licence to share adapted material derived from this article or parts of it. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Lorincz-Comi, N., Song, W., Chen, X. et al. Combining xQTL and genome-wide association studies from diverse populations improves druggable gene discovery. Nat Commun (2026). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-026-69236-z

Download citation

  • Received: 19 May 2025

  • Accepted: 22 January 2026

  • Published: 14 February 2026

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-026-69236-z

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

Download PDF

Advertisement

Explore content

  • Research articles
  • Reviews & Analysis
  • News & Comment
  • Videos
  • Collections
  • Subjects
  • Follow us on Facebook
  • Follow us on X
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed

About the journal

  • Aims & Scope
  • Editors
  • Journal Information
  • Open Access Fees and Funding
  • Calls for Papers
  • Editorial Values Statement
  • Journal Metrics
  • Editors' Highlights
  • Contact
  • Editorial policies
  • Top Articles

Publish with us

  • For authors
  • For Reviewers
  • Language editing services
  • Open access funding
  • Submit manuscript

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

  • Explore articles by subject
  • Find a job
  • Guide to authors
  • Editorial policies

Nature Communications (Nat Commun)

ISSN 2041-1723 (online)

nature.com sitemap

About Nature Portfolio

  • About us
  • Press releases
  • Press office
  • Contact us

Discover content

  • Journals A-Z
  • Articles by subject
  • protocols.io
  • Nature Index

Publishing policies

  • Nature portfolio policies
  • Open access

Author & Researcher services

  • Reprints & permissions
  • Research data
  • Language editing
  • Scientific editing
  • Nature Masterclasses
  • Research Solutions

Libraries & institutions

  • Librarian service & tools
  • Librarian portal
  • Open research
  • Recommend to library

Advertising & partnerships

  • Advertising
  • Partnerships & Services
  • Media kits
  • Branded content

Professional development

  • Nature Awards
  • Nature Careers
  • Nature Conferences

Regional websites

  • Nature Africa
  • Nature China
  • Nature India
  • Nature Japan
  • Nature Middle East
  • Privacy Policy
  • Use of cookies
  • Legal notice
  • Accessibility statement
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Your US state privacy rights
Springer Nature

© 2026 Springer Nature Limited

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing