Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Advertisement

Nature Communications
  • View all journals
  • Search
  • My Account Login
  • Content Explore content
  • About the journal
  • Publish with us
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed
  1. nature
  2. nature communications
  3. articles
  4. article
Negative feedback regulation of STING signaling by TAX1BP1-directed Golgiphagy
Download PDF
Download PDF
  • Article
  • Open access
  • Published: 11 February 2026

Negative feedback regulation of STING signaling by TAX1BP1-directed Golgiphagy

  • Sujit Suklabaidya1 na1,
  • Suchitra Mohanty1,2 na1,
  • Irene E. Reider1,
  • Jesse White1,3,
  • Dominic Colter1,
  • Sarah M. McCormick4,5,
  • Noula Shembade6,
  • Young Bong Choi4,
  • Christopher C. Norbury1 &
  • …
  • Edward W. Harhaj  ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0003-1197-67651 

Nature Communications , Article number:  (2026) Cite this article

We are providing an unedited version of this manuscript to give early access to its findings. Before final publication, the manuscript will undergo further editing. Please note there may be errors present which affect the content, and all legal disclaimers apply.

Subjects

  • Macroautophagy
  • Monocytes and macrophages
  • Pattern recognition receptors

Abstract

The cGAS-STING pathway is a critical regulator of type I Interferon (IFN) and inflammation upon cytosolic DNA-sensing. cGAS-STING signaling termination is regulated by lysosomal-mediated degradation of STING; however, the mechanisms controlling the inhibitory targeting of STING are incompletely understood. Here, we identify the selective autophagy receptor TAX1BP1 as a negative regulator of the cGAS-STING pathway. TAX1BP1-deficient macrophages activated by cGAS or STING agonists accumulate higher-order STING aggregates, exhibit heightened STING signaling, and increased production of type I IFN and proinflammatory cytokines. Mechanistically, TAX1BP1 promotes STING degradation through microautophagy by facilitating the interaction of STING with the ESCRT-0 protein HGS. Furthermore, STING activation is associated with the swelling and fragmentation of the Golgi apparatus, and TAX1BP1 and p62/SQSTM1 are essential for the autophagic degradation of fragmented Golgi (Golgiphagy). Our findings suggest that STING activation at the Golgi is coupled to its downregulation by Golgiphagy to restrict innate immune responses.

Similar content being viewed by others

Interruption of post-Golgi STING trafficking activates tonic interferon signaling

Article Open access 15 November 2022

Multifaceted functions of STING in human health and disease: from molecular mechanism to targeted strategy

Article Open access 23 December 2022

STING signalling is terminated through ESCRT-dependent microautophagy of vesicles originating from recycling endosomes

Article Open access 13 March 2023

Data availability

All data are included in the Supplementary Information or available from the authors, as are unique reagents used in this Article. The raw numbers for charts and graphs are available in the Source Data file whenever possible. Source data are provided with this paper.

References

  1. Zhang, X., Bai, X. C. & Chen, Z. J. Structures and mechanisms in the cGAS-STING innate immunity pathway. Immunity 53, 43–53 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Sun, L., Wu, J., Du, F., Chen, X. & Chen, Z. J. Cyclic GMP-AMP synthase is a cytosolic DNA sensor that activates the type I interferon pathway. Science 339, 786–791 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Ishikawa, H. & Barber, G. N. STING is an endoplasmic reticulum adaptor that facilitates innate immune signalling. Nature 455, 674–678 (2008).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Ishikawa, H., Ma, Z. & Barber, G. N. STING regulates intracellular DNA-mediated, type I interferon-dependent innate immunity. Nature 461, 788–792 (2009).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Jeltema, D., Abbott, K. & Yan, N. STING trafficking as a new dimension of immune signaling. J Exp. Med. 220 (2023).

  6. Liu, S. et al. Phosphorylation of innate immune adaptor proteins MAVS, STING, and TRIF induces IRF3 activation. Science 347, aaa2630 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Prabakaran, T. et al. Attenuation of cGAS-STING signaling is mediated by a p62/SQSTM1-dependent autophagy pathway activated by TBK1. EMBO J. 37 e97858 (2018).

  8. Gui, X. et al. Autophagy induction via STING trafficking is a primordial function of the cGAS pathway. Nature 567, 262–266 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Liu, D. et al. STING directly activates autophagy to tune the innate immune response. Cell Death Differ. 26, 1735–1749 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Liu, Y. et al. Clathrin-associated AP-1 controls termination of STING signalling. Nature 610, 761–767 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Kuchitsu, Y. et al. STING signalling is terminated through ESCRT-dependent microautophagy of vesicles originating from recycling endosomes. Nat. Cell Biol. 25, 453–466 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  12. Gentili, M. et al. ESCRT-dependent STING degradation inhibits steady-state and cGAMP-induced signalling. Nat. Commun. 14, 611 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  13. Balka, K. R. et al. Termination of STING responses is mediated via ESCRT-dependent degradation. EMBO J. 42, e112712 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  14. De Valck, D. et al. The zinc finger protein A20 interacts with a novel anti-apoptotic protein which is cleaved by specific caspases. Oncogene 18, 4182–4190 (1999).

    Google Scholar 

  15. Ling, L. & Goeddel, D. V. T6BP, a TRAF6-interacting protein involved in IL-1 signaling. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 97, 9567–9572 (2000).

    Google Scholar 

  16. Shembade, N., Harhaj, N. S., Liebl, D. J. & Harhaj, E. W. Essential role for TAX1BP1 in the termination of TNF-alpha-, IL-1- and LPS-mediated NF-kappaB and JNK signaling. EMBO J. 26, 3910–3922 (2007).

    Google Scholar 

  17. Parvatiyar, K., Barber, G. N. & Harhaj, E. W. TAX1BP1 and A20 inhibit antiviral signaling by targeting TBK1-IKKi kinases. J. Biol. Chem. 285, 14999–15009 (2010).

    Google Scholar 

  18. White, J., Suklabaidya, S., Vo, M. T., Choi, Y. B. & Harhaj, E. W. Multifaceted roles of TAX1BP1 in autophagy. Autophagy 19, 44–53 (2022).

  19. Choi, Y. B., Shembade, N., Parvatiyar, K., Balachandran, S. & Harhaj, E. W. TAX1BP1 restrains virus-induced apoptosis by facilitating itch-mediated degradation of the mitochondrial adaptor MAVS. Mol. Cell Biol. 37, e00422-16 (2017).

  20. White, J. et al. Phosphorylation of the selective autophagy receptor TAX1BP1 by TBK1 and IKBKE/IKKi promotes ATG8-family protein-dependent clearance of MAVS aggregates. Autophagy 21, 160–77 (2024).

  21. Yang, Q. et al. TRIM32-TAX1BP1-dependent selective autophagic degradation of TRIF negatively regulates TLR3/4-mediated innate immune responses. PLoS Pathog. 13, e1006600 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  22. Samie, M. et al. Selective autophagy of the adaptor TRIF regulates innate inflammatory signaling. Nat. Immunol. 19, 246–254 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  23. Qian, T. et al. Decreased TAX1BP1 participates in systemic lupus erythematosus by regulating monocyte/macrophage function. Int. Immunol. 35, 483–495 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  24. Newman, A. C. et al. TBK1 kinase addiction in lung cancer cells is mediated via autophagy of Tax1bp1/Ndp52 and non-canonical NF-kappaB signalling. PLoS ONE 7, e50672 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  25. Tumbarello, D. A. et al. Autophagy receptors link myosin VI to autophagosomes to mediate Tom1-dependent autophagosome maturation and fusion with the lysosome. Nat. Cell Biol. 14, 1024–1035 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  26. Tumbarello, D. A. et al. The autophagy receptor TAX1BP1 and the molecular motor myosin VI are required for clearance of Salmonella typhimurium by autophagy. PLoS Pathog. 11, e1005174 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  27. Iha, H. et al. Inflammatory cardiac valvulitis in TAX1BP1-deficient mice through selective NF-kappaB activation. EMBO J. 27, 629–641 (2008).

    Google Scholar 

  28. Uccellini, M. B. & Garcia-Sastre, A. ISRE-reporter mouse reveals high basal and induced type I IFN responses in inflammatory monocytes. Cell Rep. 25, 2784–2796.e2783 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  29. Reinert, L. S. et al. Sensing of HSV-1 by the cGAS-STING pathway in microglia orchestrates antiviral defence in the CNS. Nat. Commun. 7, 13348 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  30. Christensen, M. H. et al. HSV-1 ICP27 targets the TBK1-activated STING signalsome to inhibit virus-induced type I IFN expression. EMBO J. 35, 1385–1399 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  31. Yum, S., Li, M., Fang, Y. & Chen, Z. J. TBK1 recruitment to STING activates both IRF3 and NF-kappaB that mediate immune defense against tumors and viral infections. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 118, e2100225118 (2021).

  32. Abe, T. & Barber, G. N. Cytosolic-DNA-mediated, STING-dependent proinflammatory gene induction necessitates canonical NF-kappaB activation through TBK1. J. Virol. 88, 5328–5341 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  33. Balka, K. R. et al. TBK1 and IKKepsilon act redundantly to mediate STING-induced NF-kappaB responses in myeloid cells. Cell Rep. 31, 107492 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  34. Fischer, T. D., Wang, C., Padman, B. S., Lazarou, M. & Youle, R. J. STING induces LC3B lipidation onto single-membrane vesicles via the V-ATPase and ATG16L1-WD40 domain. J. Cell Biol. 219, e202009128 (2020).

  35. Vo, M. T., Smith, B. J., Nicholas, J. & Choi, Y. B. Activation of NIX-mediated mitophagy by an interferon regulatory factor homologue of human herpesvirus. Nat. Commun. 10, 3203 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  36. Sarraf, S. A. et al. Loss of TAX1BP1-directed autophagy results in protein aggregate accumulation in the brain. Mol. Cell 80, 779–795.e710 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  37. Shen, D. et al. Novel cell- and tissue-based assays for detecting misfolded and aggregated protein accumulation within aggresomes and inclusion bodies. Cell Biochem. Biophys. 60, 173–185 (2011).

    Google Scholar 

  38. Li, Z. et al. PPM1A regulates antiviral signaling by antagonizing TBK1-mediated STING phosphorylation and aggregation. PLoS Pathog. 11, e1004783 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  39. Qin, F. et al. Listerin promotes cGAS protein degradation through the ESCRT pathway to negatively regulate cGAS-mediated immune response. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 120, e2308853120 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  40. Ohnstad, A. E. et al. Receptor-mediated clustering of FIP200 bypasses the role of LC3 lipidation in autophagy. EMBO J. 39, e104948 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  41. Bauer, B., Idinger, J., Schuschnig, M., Ferrari, L. & Martens, S. Recruitment of autophagy initiator TAX1BP1 advances aggrephagy from cargo collection to sequestration. EMBO J. 43, 5910–5940 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  42. Fang, D., Xie, H., Hu, T., Shan, H. & Li, M. Binding features and functions of ATG3. Front. Cell Dev. Biol. 9, 685625 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  43. Hara, T. et al. FIP200, a ULK-interacting protein, is required for autophagosome formation in mammalian cells. J. Cell Biol. 181, 497–510 (2008).

    Google Scholar 

  44. Xun, J. et al. A conserved ion channel function of STING mediates noncanonical autophagy and cell death. EMBO Rep. 25, 544–69 (2024).

  45. Liu, B. et al. Human STING is a proton channel. Science 381, 508–514 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  46. Xu, R. H. et al. Sequential activation of two pathogen-sensing pathways required for type I interferon expression and resistance to an acute DNA virus infection. Immunity 43, 1148–1159 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  47. Wong, E. B., Montoya, B., Ferez, M., Stotesbury, C. & Sigal, L. J. Resistance to ectromelia virus infection requires cGAS in bone marrow-derived cells which can be bypassed with cGAMP therapy. PLoS Pathog. 15, e1008239 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  48. Konno, H., Konno, K. & Barber, G. N. Cyclic dinucleotides trigger ULK1 (ATG1) phosphorylation of STING to prevent sustained innate immune signaling. Cell 155, 688–698 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  49. Li, T. et al. Phosphorylation and chromatin tethering prevent cGAS activation during mitosis. Science 371 (2021).

  50. Xu, P. et al. The CRL5-SPSB3 ubiquitin ligase targets nuclear cGAS for degradation. Nature 627, 873–879 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  51. Decout, A., Katz, J. D., Venkatraman, S. & Ablasser, A. The cGAS-STING pathway as a therapeutic target in inflammatory diseases. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 21, 548–569 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  52. Gulen, M. F. et al. cGAS-STING drives ageing-related inflammation and neurodegeneration. Nature 620, 374–380 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  53. Zhang, R. et al. TAX1BP1-dependent autophagic degradation of STING1 impairs anti-tumor immunity. Autophagy 21, 1802–1823 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  54. Nthiga, T. M. et al. Regulation of Golgi turnover by CALCOCO1-mediated selective autophagy. J. Cell Biol. 220, e202006128 (2021).

  55. Hickey, K. L. et al. Proteome census upon nutrient stress reveals Golgiphagy membrane receptors. Nature 623, 167–174 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  56. Kitta, S. et al. YIPF3 and YIPF4 regulate autophagic turnover of the Golgi apparatus. EMBO J. 43, 2954–78 (2024).

  57. Kemmoku, H. et al. Single-molecule localization microscopy reveals STING clustering at the trans-Golgi network through palmitoylation-dependent accumulation of cholesterol. Nat. Commun. 15, 220 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  58. Pankiv, S. et al. p62/SQSTM1 binds directly to Atg8/LC3 to facilitate degradation of ubiquitinated protein aggregates by autophagy. J. Biol. Chem. 282, 24131–24145 (2007).

    Google Scholar 

  59. Turco, E. et al. Reconstitution defines the roles of p62, NBR1 and TAX1BP1 in ubiquitin condensate formation and autophagy initiation. Nat. Commun. 12, 5212 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  60. Shembade, N., Ma, A. & Harhaj, E. W. Inhibition of NF-kappaB signaling by A20 through disruption of ubiquitin enzyme complexes. Science 327, 1135–1139 (2010).

    Google Scholar 

  61. Lazarou, M. et al. The ubiquitin kinase PINK1 recruits autophagy receptors to induce mitophagy. Nature 524, 309–314 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  62. Gonugunta, V. K. et al. Trafficking-mediated STING degradation requires sorting to acidified endolysosomes and can be targeted to enhance anti-tumor response. Cell Rep. 21, 3234–3242 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  63. Choi, C. Y., Vo, M. T., Nicholas, J. & Choi, Y. B. Autophagy-competent mitochondrial translation elongation factor TUFM inhibits caspase-8-mediated apoptosis. Cell Death Differ. 29, 451–464 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  64. Mohanty, S. et al. The E3/E4 ubiquitin conjugation factor UBE4B interacts with and ubiquitinates the HTLV-1 tax oncoprotein to promote NF-kappaB activation. PLoS Pathog. 16, e1008504 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  65. Taylor, M. P., Kobiler, O. & Enquist, L. W. Alphaherpesvirus axon-to-cell spread involves limited virion transmission. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 109, 17046–17051 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  66. Sei, J. J. et al. Peptide-MHC-I from endogenous antigen outnumber those from exogenous antigen, irrespective of APC phenotype or activation. PLoS Pathog. 11, e1004941 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank Dr. John Wills (Penn State College of Medicine) and Lynn Enquist (Princeton University) for HSV-1 YFP, Dr. Richard Youle (National Institutes of Health) for TAX1BP1-KO HeLa cells, Dr. Nan Yan (UT Southwestern) for STING-eGFP plasmid and Dr. Adolfo García-Sastre (Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai) for Mx-1 GFP mice. We thank John Tawil for the critical reading of the manuscript. We also acknowledge Dr. Loic Dragin for initial contributions to this project. We thank Dr. Han Chen for assistance with TEM studies. The experiments in this manuscript used the Penn State College of Medicine Advanced Light Microscopy Core, TEM Core and the Flow Cytometry Core. The Advanced Light Microscopy Core (RRID: SCR_022526), the TEM Core (RRID:SCR_021200) and Flow Cytometry Core (RRID:SCR_021134), services and instruments used in this project were funded, in part, by the Pennsylvania State University College of Medicine via the Office of the Vice Dean of Research and Graduate Students and the Pennsylvania Department of Health using Tobacco Settlement Funds (CURE). The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the University or the College of Medicine. The Pennsylvania Department of Health specifically disclaims responsibility for any analyses, interpretations, or conclusions. This work was supported by NIH grant R01 AI162815 (to E.W.H.).

Author information

Author notes
  1. These authors contributed equally: Sujit Suklabaidya, Suchitra Mohanty.

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Cell and Biological Systems, Penn State College School of Medicine, Hershey, PA, USA

    Sujit Suklabaidya, Suchitra Mohanty, Irene E. Reider, Jesse White, Dominic Colter, Christopher C. Norbury & Edward W. Harhaj

  2. Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA

    Suchitra Mohanty

  3. Harvard Medical School, Brigham and Women’s Hospital Channing Laboratory, Boston, MA, USA

    Jesse White

  4. Department of Oncology, Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA

    Sarah M. McCormick & Young Bong Choi

  5. Natea Inc, San Carlos, CA, USA

    Sarah M. McCormick

  6. Department of Microbiology and Immunology, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL, USA

    Noula Shembade

Authors
  1. Sujit Suklabaidya
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Suchitra Mohanty
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Irene E. Reider
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Jesse White
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Dominic Colter
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Sarah M. McCormick
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Noula Shembade
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Young Bong Choi
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Christopher C. Norbury
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  10. Edward W. Harhaj
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

S.S., S.M., C.C.N. and E.W.H. designed the experiments. S.S. and S.M. performed most of the experiments. I.E.R. and C.C.N. performed the Ectromelia infections in mice. S.S., S.M., J.W., C.C.N. and E.W.H. analyzed the data. Y.B.C. and S.M.M. performed initial experiments and Y.B.C. also performed the NanoBiT assays and generated the Golgiphagy reporter. N.S. contributed to the generation of Tax1bp1fl/fl mice. D.C. performed bioinformatics analysis. E.W.H. and S.S. wrote the manuscript. S.S., S.M., J.W., Y.B.C. and C.C.N. edited the manuscript. E.W.H. conceived and supervised the project and acquired funding for it. All authors reviewed and approved the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Edward W. Harhaj.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Peer review

Peer review information

Nature Communications thanks Zhi Jian Chen who co-reviewed with Jing Zhang; Terje Johansen, and the other, anonymous, reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work. A peer review file is available.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Information

Transparent Peer Review file

Reporting Summary

Source data

Source Data

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if you modified the licensed material. You do not have permission under this licence to share adapted material derived from this article or parts of it. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Suklabaidya, S., Mohanty, S., Reider, I.E. et al. Negative feedback regulation of STING signaling by TAX1BP1-directed Golgiphagy. Nat Commun (2026). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-026-69422-z

Download citation

  • Received: 03 October 2024

  • Accepted: 27 January 2026

  • Published: 11 February 2026

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-026-69422-z

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

Download PDF

Advertisement

Explore content

  • Research articles
  • Reviews & Analysis
  • News & Comment
  • Videos
  • Collections
  • Subjects
  • Follow us on Facebook
  • Follow us on X
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed

About the journal

  • Aims & Scope
  • Editors
  • Journal Information
  • Open Access Fees and Funding
  • Calls for Papers
  • Editorial Values Statement
  • Journal Metrics
  • Editors' Highlights
  • Contact
  • Editorial policies
  • Top Articles

Publish with us

  • For authors
  • For Reviewers
  • Language editing services
  • Open access funding
  • Submit manuscript

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

  • Explore articles by subject
  • Find a job
  • Guide to authors
  • Editorial policies

Nature Communications (Nat Commun)

ISSN 2041-1723 (online)

nature.com sitemap

About Nature Portfolio

  • About us
  • Press releases
  • Press office
  • Contact us

Discover content

  • Journals A-Z
  • Articles by subject
  • protocols.io
  • Nature Index

Publishing policies

  • Nature portfolio policies
  • Open access

Author & Researcher services

  • Reprints & permissions
  • Research data
  • Language editing
  • Scientific editing
  • Nature Masterclasses
  • Research Solutions

Libraries & institutions

  • Librarian service & tools
  • Librarian portal
  • Open research
  • Recommend to library

Advertising & partnerships

  • Advertising
  • Partnerships & Services
  • Media kits
  • Branded content

Professional development

  • Nature Awards
  • Nature Careers
  • Nature Conferences

Regional websites

  • Nature Africa
  • Nature China
  • Nature India
  • Nature Japan
  • Nature Middle East
  • Privacy Policy
  • Use of cookies
  • Legal notice
  • Accessibility statement
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Your US state privacy rights
Springer Nature

© 2026 Springer Nature Limited

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing