Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Advertisement

Nature Communications
  • View all journals
  • Search
  • My Account Login
  • Content Explore content
  • About the journal
  • Publish with us
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed
  1. nature
  2. nature communications
  3. articles
  4. article
One-pot co-upcycling of mixed polyolefin waste
Download PDF
Download PDF
  • Article
  • Open access
  • Published: 02 March 2026

One-pot co-upcycling of mixed polyolefin waste

  • Weilin Tu1 na1,
  • Mingyu Chu1 na1,
  • Tianran Yan1,
  • Qingqing Zhang1,
  • Xianpeng Wang1,
  • Liang Zhang  ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0002-3446-31721,
  • Muhan Cao1,
  • Qiao Zhang  ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0001-9682-32951,
  • Mingshan Zhu  ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0002-5926-53832,
  • Mingxiu Zhan  ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0001-7574-78523 &
  • …
  • Jinxing Chen  ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0001-9254-74301 

Nature Communications , Article number:  (2026) Cite this article

  • 3361 Accesses

  • 2 Altmetric

  • Metrics details

We are providing an unedited version of this manuscript to give early access to its findings. Before final publication, the manuscript will undergo further editing. Please note there may be errors present which affect the content, and all legal disclaimers apply.

Subjects

  • Catalysis
  • Sustainability

Abstract

The compositional heterogeneity of post-consumer plastic waste, exemplified by prevalent polyethylene (PE)/polypropylene (PP) mixtures (>50% of the plastic market), severely complicates recycling. Kinetic disparities between PE and PP during chemical recycling create significant conversion gradients, limiting valued product yield and process viability. Here, leveraging strong interfacial coupling between ruthenium oxides and rutile TiO2, we construct highly active, epitaxial RuOx sites enabling efficient one-pot co-conversion of PE/PP mixtures with a high liquid yield of 95.02%, while maintaining a low 0.62% gas yield. Compared to conventional Ru nanoparticles, the epitaxial RuOx structure provides additional dehydrogenation sites for PP activation, which promotes carbon–metal back-donation to weaken C–C bonds, thus exhibiting comparable activation capabilities toward both 3C–2C bond in PP and 2C–2C bond in PE. This unique epitaxial catalyst enables highly efficient co-hydrogenolysis of mixed polyolefins, establishing a practical approach for their upcycling.

Similar content being viewed by others

Efficient solvent- and hydrogen-free upcycling of high-density polyethylene into separable cyclic hydrocarbons

Article 26 June 2023

Polyethylene hydrogenolysis by dilute RuPt alloy to achieve H2-pressure-independent low methane selectivity

Article Open access 04 December 2024

Upcycling polyolefins to methane-free liquid fuel by a Ru1-ZrO2 catalyst

Article Open access 21 March 2025

Data availability

The source data generated in this study are provided in the Source Data file. All data are available from the corresponding author upon request. Source data are provided with this paper.

References

  1. Stegmann, P. et al. Plastic futures and their CO2 emissions. Nature 612, 272–276 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  2. MacLeod, M. et al. The global threat from plastic pollution. Science 373, 61–65 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Sardon, H. & Dove, A. P. Plastics recycling with a difference. Science 360, 380–381 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Zheng, K. et al. Progress and perspective for the conversion of plastic wastes into valuable chemicals. Chem. Soc. Rev. 52, 8–29 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Geyer, R. et al. Production, use, and fate of all plastics ever made. Sci. Adv. 3, e1700782 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Stubbins, A. et al. Plastics in the Earth system. Science 373, 51–55 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Coates, G. W. & Getzler, Y. D. Y. L. Chemical recycling to monomer for an ideal, circular polymer economy. Nat. Rev. Mater. 5, 501–516 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Conk, R. J. et al. Polyolefin waste to light olefins with ethylene and base-metal heterogeneous catalysts. Science 385, 1322–1327 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Hu, P. et al. Stable interfacial ruthenium species for highly efficient polyolefin upcycling. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 146, 7076–7087 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Ellis, L. D. et al. Chemical and biological catalysis for plastics recycling and upcycling. Nat. Catal. 4, 539–556 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Chu, M. Y. et al. Efficient polyolefin upcycling over a single-atom alloy catalyst. CCS Chem 7, 2451–2464 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  12. Sun, J. et al. Catalytic upcycling of polyolefins. Chem. Rev. 124, 9457–9579 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  13. Jehanno, C. et al. Critical advances and future opportunities in upcycling commodity polymers. Nature 603, 803–814 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  14. Chen, S. et al. Ultrasmall amorphous zirconia nanoparticles catalyse polyolefin hydrogenolysis. Nat. Catal. 6, 161–173 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  15. Zhao, M. et al. Enhancing the conversion efficiency of polyethylene to methane through codoping of Mn atoms into Ru centers and CeO2 supports. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 146, 33104–33111 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  16. Wei, T. et al. Catalytic recycling of plastics into value-added products. Nano Res. 17, 9428–9445 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  17. Chu, M. et al. Co-recycling of plastics and other waste materials. Nat. Rev. Clean Technol. 1, 320–332 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  18. Rorrer, J. E. et al. Hydrogenolysis of polypropylene and mixed polyolefin plastic waste over Ru/C to produce liquid alkanes. ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng. 9, 11661–11666 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  19. Xu, Z. et al. Chemical upcycling of polyethylene, polypropylene, and mixtures to high-value surfactants. Science 381, 666–671 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  20. Sullivan, K. P. et al. Mixed plastics waste valorization through tandem chemical oxidation and biological funneling. Science 378, 207–211 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  21. Wang, M. et al. Complete hydrogenolysis of mixed plastic wastes. Nat. Chem. Eng. 1, 376–384 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  22. Shi, Y. et al. Advances and challenges for catalytic recycling and upgrading of real-world mixed plastic waste. ACS Catal. 15, 841–868 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  23. Korley, L. T. J. et al. Toward polymer upcycling—adding value and tackling circularity. Science 373, 66–69 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  24. Clarke, R. W. et al. Dynamic crosslinking compatibilizes immiscible mixed plastics. Nature 616, 731–739 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  25. Zhang, Z. et al. Mixed plastics waste upcycling with a high-stability single-atom Ru catalyst. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 145, 22836–22844 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  26. Wang, C. et al. Polyethylene hydrogenolysis at mild conditions over ruthenium on tungstated zirconia. JACS Au 1, 1422–1434 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  27. Wang, X. et al. Enhancing waste plastic hydrogenolysis on Ru/CeO2 through concurrent incorporation of Fe single atoms and FeOx nanoclusters. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 64, e202506035 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  28. Kots, P. A. et al. Electronic modulation of metal-support interactions improves polypropylene hydrogenolysis over ruthenium catalysts. Nat. Commun. 13, 5186 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  29. Zhao, T. Y. et al. Mechanistic insights into processive polyethylene hydrogenolysis through in situ NMR. Macromolecules 56, 4287–4295 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  30. Hu, Q. et al. Polyethylene hydrogenolysis by dilute RuPt alloy to achieve H2-pressure-independent low methane selectivity. Nat. Commun. 15, 10573 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  31. Nakaji, Y. et al. Low-temperature catalytic upgrading of waste polyolefinic plastics into liquid fuels and waxes. Appl. Catal. B-Environ. 285, 119805 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  32. Kang, Q. et al. Entropy confinement promotes hydrogenolysis activity for polyethylene upcycling. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 62, e202313174 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  33. Chen, L. et al. Efficient and selective dual-pathway polyolefin hydro-conversion over unexpectedly bifunctional M/TiO2-anatase catalysts. Appl. Catal. B-Environ. 335, 122897 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  34. Chen, L. et al. Effect of reaction conditions on the hydrogenolysis of polypropylene and polyethylene into gas and liquid alkanes. React. Chem. Eng. 7, 844–854 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  35. Tamura, M. et al. Structure-activity relationship in hydrogenolysis of polyolefins over Ru/support catalysts. Appl. Catal. B-Environ. 318, 121870 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  36. Tu, W. et al. SMSI-induced charge transfer for selective hydrogenolysis of polyolefins. Appl. Catal. B-Environ. 339, 123122 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  37. Si, X. et al. Ni-catalyzed carbon–carbon bonds cleavage of mixed polyolefin plastic waste. J. Energy Chem. 85, 562–569 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  38. Ma, W. et al. Catalytic hydrogenolysis of polypropylene and polyethylene mixtures: Effect of temperature on liquid alkane components. J. Energy Inst. 115, 101615 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  39. Zichittella, G. et al. Hydrogenolysis of polyethylene and polypropylene into propane over cobalt-based catalysts. JACS Au 2, 2259–2268 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  40. Hackler, R. A. et al. Effect of macro- and microstructures on catalytic hydrogenolysis of polyolefins. Macromolecules 55, 6801–6810 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  41. Flaherty, D. W. et al. Metal-catalyzed C–C bond cleavage in alkanes: effects of methyl substitution on transition-state structures and stability. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 136, 9664–9676 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  42. Hibbitts, D. D. et al. Role of branching on the rate and mechanism of C–C cleavage in alkanes on metal surfaces. ACS Catal. 6, 469–482 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  43. Kim, S. et al. Ru-catalyzed polyethylene hydrogenolysis under quasi-supercritical conditions. JACS Au 5, 1760–1770 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  44. Chu, M. et al. Site-selective polyolefin hydrogenolysis on atomic Ru for methanation suppression and liquid fuel production. Research 6, 0032 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  45. Chen, L. et al. Disordered, sub-nanometer Ru structures on CeO2 are highly efficient and selective catalysts in polymer upcycling by hydrogenolysis. ACS Catal. 12, 4618–4627 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  46. Zhou, J. et al. Interfacial compatibility critically controls Ru/TiO2 metal-support interaction modes in CO2 hydrogenation. Nat. Commun. 13, 327 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  47. O’Sullivan, M. et al. Interface control by chemical and dimensional matching in an oxide heterostructure. Nat. Chem. 8, 347–353 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  48. Tang, X. et al. Significance of epitaxial growth of PtO2 on rutile TiO2 for Pt/TiO2 catalysts. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 146, 3764–3772 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  49. Chen, S. et al. Morphology-engineered highly active and stable Ru/TiO2 catalysts for selective CO methanation. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 58, 10732–10736 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  50. Guo, Y. et al. Low-temperature CO2 methanation over CeO2-supported Ru single atoms, nanoclusters, and nanoparticles competitively tuned by strong metal–support interactions and H-spillover effect. ACS Catal. 8, 6203–6215 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  51. Wang, F. et al. Catalytic behavior of supported Ru nanoparticles on the {100}, {110}, and {111} facets of CeO2. J. Catal. 329, 177–186 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  52. Sanz-Marco, A. et al. Continuous photothermal gas-phase CO2 hydrogenation over highly dispersed Ru-Ni on TiO2. Catal. Today 459, 115440 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  53. Cisneros, S. et al. Oxygen vacancies in Ru/TiO2-drivers of low-temperature CO2 methanation assessed by multimodal operando spectroscopy. iScience 25, 103886 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  54. Hadjiivanov, K. et al. FTIR study of CO interaction with Ru/TiO2 catalysts. J. Catal. 176, 415–425 (1998).

    Google Scholar 

  55. Solymosi, F. & Raskó, J. An infrared study of the influence of CO adsorption on the topology of supported ruthenium. J. Catal. 115, 107–119 (1989).

    Google Scholar 

  56. Zhang, Y. et al. Strong metal-support interaction of Ru on TiO2 derived from the CO-reduction mechanism of RuxTi1–xO2 interphase. ACS Catal. 12, 1697–1705 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  57. Chen, L.-N. et al. Ru nanoparticles supported on partially reduced TiO2 as a highly efficient catalyst for hydrogen evolution. Nano Energy 88, 106211 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  58. Jaydev, S. D. et al. Identifying selective catalysts in polypropylene hydrogenolysis by decoupling scission pathways. Chem Cataly. 3, 100564 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  59. Yan, X. et al. Size control of polymer-stabilized ruthenium nanoparticles by polyol reduction. J. Mater. Chem. 11, 3387–3391 (2001).

    Google Scholar 

  60. Nakagawa, Y. et al. Regioselectivity and reaction mechanism of Ru-catalyzed hydrogenolysis of squalane and model alkanes. ChemSusChem 10, 189–198 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  61. Kresse, G. & Furthmüller, J. Efficiency of ab-initio total energy calculations for metals and semiconductors using a plane-wave basis set. Comput. Mater. Sci. 6, 15–50 (1996).

    Google Scholar 

  62. Kresse, G. & Hafner, J. Ab initio molecular dynamics for liquid metals. Phys. Rev. B 47, 558–561 (1993).

    Google Scholar 

  63. Kresse, G. & Furthmüller, J. Efficient iterative schemes for ab initio total-energy calculations using a plane-wave basis set. Phys. Rev. B 54, 11169–11186 (1996).

    Google Scholar 

  64. Perdew, J. P. et al. Generalized gradient approximation made simple. Phys. Rev. Lett. 77, 3865–3868 (1996).

    Google Scholar 

  65. Blöchl, P. E. Projector augmented-wave method. Phys. Rev. B 50, 17953–17979 (1994).

    Google Scholar 

  66. Grimme, S. et al. A consistent and accurate ab initio parametrization of density functional dispersion correction (DFT-D) for the 94 elements H-Pu. J. Chem. Phys. 132, 154104 (2010).

    Google Scholar 

  67. Woo, T. K. et al. A combined Car−Parrinello QM/MM implementation for ab initio molecular dynamics simulations of extended systems:  Application to transition metal catalysis. J. Phys. Chem. B 101, 7877–7880 (1997).

    Google Scholar 

  68. Jarzynski, C. Nonequilibrium equality for free energy differences. Phys. Rev. Lett. 78, 2690–2693 (1997).

    Google Scholar 

  69. Oberhofer, H. et al. Biased sampling of nonequilibrium trajectories:  Can fast switching simulations outperform conventional free energy calculation methods?. J. Phys. Chem. B 109, 6902–6915 (2005).

    Google Scholar 

  70. Andersen, H. C. Molecular dynamics simulations at constant pressure and/or temperature. J. Chem. Phys. 72, 2384–2393 (1980).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 22376152 to J.C. and No. 42377013 to M.X.Z.), Jiangsu Provincial Fund for Excellent Young Scholars (BK20240154 to J.C.), and Suzhou Frontier Technology Research Advanced Materials Project (SYG202305 to J.C.). M.Z. thanks the support from Zhejiang Provincial Key Research and Development Program (2025C02207). J.C. thanks the support from the Suzhou Key Laboratory of Advanced Photonic Materials, Collaborative Innovation Center of Suzhou Nano Science & Technology, and the 111 Project. We thank the BL13SSW beamline at the Shanghai Synchrotron Radiation Facility (https://cstr.cn/31124.02.SSRF. BL13SSW) for the XAFS experiments support. The authors also thank Dr. Xuefei Weng and Dr. Yifan Li for the technical support for Nano-X from Suzhou Institute of Nano-Tech and Nano-Bionics (SINANO), Chinese Academy of Sciences, and Dr. Xuchun Wang for data curation.

Author information

Author notes
  1. These authors contributed equally: Weilin Tu, Mingyu Chu.

Authors and Affiliations

  1. State Key Laboratory of Bioinspired Interfacial Materials Science, Institute of Functional Nano & Soft Materials (FUNSOM), Soochow University, Suzhou, P. R. China

    Weilin Tu, Mingyu Chu, Tianran Yan, Qingqing Zhang, Xianpeng Wang, Liang Zhang, Muhan Cao, Qiao Zhang & Jinxing Chen

  2. College of Environment and Climate, Jinan University, Guangzhou, P. R. China

    Mingshan Zhu

  3. College of Energy Environment and Safety Engineering, China Jiliang University, Hangzhou, P.R. China

    Mingxiu Zhan

Authors
  1. Weilin Tu
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Mingyu Chu
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Tianran Yan
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Qingqing Zhang
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Xianpeng Wang
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Liang Zhang
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Muhan Cao
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Qiao Zhang
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Mingshan Zhu
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  10. Mingxiu Zhan
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  11. Jinxing Chen
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

Q.Z. and J.C. conceived and supervised the project. W.T. and M.Y.C. carried out the experiments and collected the date. T.Y. and L.Z. contributed to the XAFS measurement and provided analysis. M.X.Z., Q.Q.Z. and X.W. provided the DFT calculation. W.T., M.Y.C. and M.H.C. wrote the manuscript, and M.S.Z., M.X.Z., J.C., and Q.Z. revised it. All the authors contributed to the whole manuscript.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Mingxiu Zhan or Jinxing Chen.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Peer review

Peer review information

Nature Communications thanks the anonymous reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work. A peer review file is available.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Supplementary information (download PDF )

Transparent Peer Review file (download PDF )

Source data

Source data 1 (download XLSX )

Source data 2 (download XLSX )

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if you modified the licensed material. You do not have permission under this licence to share adapted material derived from this article or parts of it. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Tu, W., Chu, M., Yan, T. et al. One-pot co-upcycling of mixed polyolefin waste. Nat Commun (2026). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-026-70104-z

Download citation

  • Received: 20 August 2025

  • Accepted: 13 February 2026

  • Published: 02 March 2026

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-026-70104-z

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

Download PDF

Advertisement

Explore content

  • Research articles
  • Reviews & Analysis
  • News & Comment
  • Videos
  • Collections
  • Subjects
  • Follow us on Facebook
  • Follow us on X
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed

About the journal

  • Aims & Scope
  • Editors
  • Journal Information
  • Open Access Fees and Funding
  • Calls for Papers
  • Editorial Values Statement
  • Journal Metrics
  • Editors' Highlights
  • Contact
  • Editorial policies
  • Top Articles

Publish with us

  • For authors
  • For Reviewers
  • Language editing services
  • Open access funding
  • Submit manuscript

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

  • Explore articles by subject
  • Find a job
  • Guide to authors
  • Editorial policies

Nature Communications (Nat Commun)

ISSN 2041-1723 (online)

nature.com footer links

About Nature Portfolio

  • About us
  • Press releases
  • Press office
  • Contact us

Discover content

  • Journals A-Z
  • Articles by subject
  • protocols.io
  • Nature Index

Publishing policies

  • Nature portfolio policies
  • Open access

Author & Researcher services

  • Reprints & permissions
  • Research data
  • Language editing
  • Scientific editing
  • Nature Masterclasses
  • Research Solutions

Libraries & institutions

  • Librarian service & tools
  • Librarian portal
  • Open research
  • Recommend to library

Advertising & partnerships

  • Advertising
  • Partnerships & Services
  • Media kits
  • Branded content

Professional development

  • Nature Awards
  • Nature Careers
  • Nature Conferences

Regional websites

  • Nature Africa
  • Nature China
  • Nature India
  • Nature Japan
  • Nature Middle East
  • Privacy Policy
  • Use of cookies
  • Legal notice
  • Accessibility statement
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Your US state privacy rights
Springer Nature

© 2026 Springer Nature Limited

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing