Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Advertisement

Nature Communications
  • View all journals
  • Search
  • My Account Login
  • Content Explore content
  • About the journal
  • Publish with us
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed
  1. nature
  2. nature communications
  3. articles
  4. article
Quantifying the trade-off between spring phenology and lethal frost risk: a meta-analysis
Download PDF
Download PDF
  • Article
  • Open access
  • Published: 05 March 2026

Quantifying the trade-off between spring phenology and lethal frost risk: a meta-analysis

  • Zhengjie Yan1,
  • Cheng Chen1,
  • Yue Liu1,
  • Yujiang Li  ORCID: orcid.org/0009-0007-8941-04771,
  • Huiying Liu  ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0001-8903-61032,
  • Hao Wang  ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0001-9115-12903,
  • Tao Yan1,
  • Xin Jing  ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0002-7146-71801,
  • Shuai Ren4,
  • Hongbiao Zi1,
  • Yan Shi1,
  • Tao Wang  ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0002-1323-86975 &
  • …
  • Jin-Sheng He  ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0001-5081-35691,6 

Nature Communications , Article number:  (2026) Cite this article

  • 2088 Accesses

  • 7 Altmetric

  • Metrics details

We are providing an unedited version of this manuscript to give early access to its findings. Before final publication, the manuscript will undergo further editing. Please note there may be errors present which affect the content, and all legal disclaimers apply.

Subjects

  • Evolutionary ecology
  • Phenology

Abstract

The timing of spring phenology represents a critical trade-off between growing season extension and frost risk avoidance, the balance of which governs plant fitness and shapes plant species’ distributions. However, few quantitative assessments exist, indicating that this trade-off is largely untested empirically. Here, we present a global meta-analysis encompassing 193 plant species across 126 study sites, finding consistently high freezing resistance (to −12 °C) with remarkably low lethal frost risk (safety margin of 17 °C) during spring emergence. Under projected climate warming scenarios, predictions indicate that advances in spring phenology do not affect the lethal frost risk under light and moderate warming scenarios. This is likely due to the reduced temperature sensitivity, consistent with trade-off predictions. By contrast, in the high-warming scenario, the freezing safety margin is predicted to expand (by ~1.7 °C), resulting in a lower lethal frost risk. This expansion may compensate for the diminished freezing resistance predicted under extreme warming. Our findings challenge the conventional view that simple environmental factors moderate spring phenology, and highlight the necessity of incorporating biotic factors (e.g., freezing resistance) and biotic processes (e.g., early growth versus frost risk trade-offs) into next-generation phenological models to enhance prediction accuracy under climate change.

Similar content being viewed by others

Acquisitive plants exhibit stronger phenological shifts in response to warming: insights from meta-analysis and long-term monitoring

Article Open access 26 March 2026

Phenological response to climatic change depends on spring warming velocity

Article Open access 28 October 2024

Late spring frost delays tree spring phenology by reducing photosynthetic productivity

Article 06 January 2025

Data availability

All data used in this study are available and stored in Figshare repository: https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.2887707278. All data supporting the results are available as follows: WorldClim Database, www.worldclim.com; Climatic Research Unit (CRU TS Version 4.06), crudata.uea.ac.uk; USDA Plants Database, plants.usda.gov; China Flora/Fauna Handbook (CFH search), www.cfh.ac.cn; Future climatic data with three Shared Socioeconomic Pathways (SSP1-2.6, SSP2-4.5, and SSP5-8.5) derived from Coupled Model Inter-Comparison Project Phase 6 (CMIP6), esgf-node.llnl.gov/ projects/cmip6/. Source data are provided with this paper.

Code availability

All figures generate, models and statistical background were performed using R 4.4.2 and MATLAB R2022b, the complete codes used to generate the results reported in this study are available in the Figshare repository: https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.2887707278.

References

  1. Richardson, A. D. et al. Climate change, phenology, and phenological control of vegetation feedbacks to the climate system. Agric. Meteorol. 169, 156–173 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Piao, S. L. et al. Plant phenology and global climate change: current progresses and challenges. Glob. Chang Biol. 25, 1922–1940 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Lieth, H. Phenology and Seasonality Modeling Vol. 444 (Springer Verlag, Berlin, 1974).

  4. Fu, Y. H. et al. Recent spring phenology shifts in western Central Europe based on multiscale observations. Glob. Ecol. Biogeogr. 23, 1255–1263 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Guo, J. et al. Meta-analytic and experimental evidence that warmer climate leads to shift from advanced to delayed spring phenology. Agric. Meteorol. 342, 109721 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Vitasse, Y., Lenz, A. & Körner, C. The interaction between freezing tolerance and phenology in temperate deciduous trees. Front Plant Sci. 5, 541 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Vitasse, Y., Lenz, A., Hoch, G. & Körner, C. Earlier leaf-out rather than difference in freezing resistance puts juvenile trees at greater risk of damage than adult trees. J. Ecol. 102, 981–988 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Vitra, A., Lenz, A. & Vitasse, Y. Frost hardening and dehardening potential in temperate trees from winter to budburst. N. Phytol. 216, 113–123 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Lenz, A., Hoch, G., Vitasse, Y. & Körner, C. European deciduous trees exhibit similar safety margins against damage by spring freeze events along elevational gradients. N. Phytol. 200, 1166–1175 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Lenz, A., Hoch, G. & Vitasse, Y. Fast acclimation of freezing resistance suggests no influence of winter minimum temperature on the range limit of European beech. Tree Physiol. 36, 490–501 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Lee, B. R. & Ibáñez, I. Improved phenological escape can help temperate tree seedlings maintain demographic performance under climate change conditions. Glob. Chang Biol. 27, 3883–3897 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  12. Buermann, W. et al. Widespread seasonal compensation effects of spring warming on northern plant productivity. Nature 562, 110–114 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  13. Lee, B. R. & Ibáñez, I. Spring phenological escape is critical for the survival of temperate tree seedlings. Funct. Ecol. 35, 1848–1861 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  14. Vitasse, Y. et al. Ontogenic changes rather than difference in temperature cause understory trees to leaf out earlier. N. Phytol. 198, 149–155 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  15. Yan, Z. J. et al. No slowdown of growing season extension with warming in a permafrost- affected meadow on the Tibetan Plateau. J. Ecol. 112, 1774–1786 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  16. Zi, H. B. et al. Simulated climate warming decreases fruit number but increases seed mass. Glob. Chang Biol. 29, 841–855 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  17. Chamberlain, C. J. & Wolkovich, E. M. Late spring freezes coupled with warming winters alter temperate tree phenology and growth. N. Phytol. 231, 987–995 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  18. Körner, C. Plant adaptation to cold climates. F1000Res 5, 2769 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  19. Grossman, J. J. Phenological physiology: seasonal patterns of plant stress tolerance in a changing climate. N. Phytol. 237, 1508–1524 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  20. Neuner, G. Frost resistance in alpine woody plants. Front. Plant Sci. 5, 654 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  21. Liu, Q. et al. Extension of the growing season increases vegetation exposure to frost. Nat. Commun. 9, 426 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  22. Zohner, C. M. et al. Late-spring frost risk between 1959 and 2017 decreased in North America but increased in Europe and Asia. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 117, 12192–12200 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  23. Ma, Q. Q., Huang, J. G., Hänninen, H. & Berninger, F. Divergent trends in the risk of spring frost damage to trees in Europe with recent warming. Glob. Chang Biol. 25, 351–360 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  24. Wang, J. M. et al. Late spring frost delays tree spring phenology by reducing photosynthetic productivity. Nat. Clim. Change 15, 201–209 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  25. Qiu, H. Y. et al. Flowering in the Northern Hemisphere is delayed by frost after leaf-out. Nat. Commun. 15, 9123 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  26. Richardson, A. D. et al. Ecosystem warming extends vegetation activity but heightens vulnerability to cold temperatures. Nature 560, 368–371 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  27. Kovaleski, A. P., Reisch, B. I. & Londo, J. P. Deacclimation kinetics as a quantitative phenotype for delineating the dormancy transition and thermal efficiency for budbreak in Vitis species. AoB PLANTS 10, ply066 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  28. North, M., Workmaster, B. A. & Atucha, A. Effects of chill unit accumulation and temperature on woody plant deacclimation kinetics. Physiol. Plant. 174, e13717 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  29. Hu, Z., Lin, S., Wang, H. & Dai, J. Seasonal variations of cold hardiness and dormancy depth in five temperate woody plants in China. Front. Glob. Change 5, 1061191 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  30. Ettinger, A. K. et al. Winter temperatures predominate in spring phenological responses to warming. Nat. Clim. Chang. 10, 1137–U119 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  31. Wang, H. J. et al. Overestimation of the effect of climatic warming on spring phenology due to misrepresentation of chilling. Nat. Commun. 11, 4945 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  32. Zhang, G. Review on methods for measuring frost hardiness in woody plants abroad. World Res. 18, 16–22 (2005).

    Google Scholar 

  33. Blumstein, M., Gersony, J., Martínez-Vilalta, J. & Sala, A. Global variation in nonstructural carbohydrate stores in response to climate. Glob. Chang Biol. 29, 1854–1869 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  34. Tan, X. Q. et al. Characterization of the difference between day and night temperatures on the growth, photosynthesis, and metabolite accumulation of tea seedlings. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 24, 6718 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  35. Ouyang, L., Leus, L., Keyser, E. D. & Labeke, M. C. V. Temperature is an important driver for cold acclimation in garden roses. Sci. Hortic. 296, 110905 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  36. Vyse, K., Pagter, M., Zuther, E. & Hincha, D. K. De-acclimation after cold acclimation—a crucial, but widely neglected part of plant winter survival. J. Exp. Bot. 70, 4595–4604 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  37. Malyshev, A. V., Henry, H. A. L. & Kreyling, J. Relative effects of temperature vs. photoperiod on growth and cold acclimation of northern and southern ecotypes of the grass Arrhenatherum elatius. Environ. Exp. Bot. 106, 189–196 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  38. Sierra-Almeida, A., Cavieres, L. A. & Bravo, L. A. Freezing resistance of high-elevation plant species is not related to their height or growth-form in the Central Chilean Andes. Environ. Exp. Bot. 69, 273–278 (2010).

    Google Scholar 

  39. Zohner, C. M., Rockinger, A. & Renner, S. S. Increased autumn productivity permits temperate trees to compensate for spring frost damage. N. Phytol. 221, 789–795 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  40. Wang, S. P. et al. Asymmetric sensitivity of first flowering date to warming and cooling in alpine plants. Ecology 95, 3387–3398 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  41. Wang, J. & Liu, D. S. Vegetation green-up date is more sensitive to permafrost degradation than climate change in spring across the northern permafrost region. Glob. Chang Biol. 28, 1569–1582 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  42. Gamhewa, H. et al. The duration of high spring light for understorey plants: Contrasting responses to spatial and temporal temperature variation. J. Ecol. 113, 2526–2538 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  43. Bennie, J., Kubin, E., Wiltshire, A., Huntley, B. & Baxter, R. Predicting spatial and temporal patterns of bud-burst and spring frost risk in north-west Europe: the implications of local adaptation to climate. Glob. Chang Biol. 16, 1503–1514 (2010).

    Google Scholar 

  44. Fu, Y. S. H. et al. Declining global warming effects on the phenology of spring leaf unfolding. Nature 526, 104–107 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  45. Körner, C. & Basler, D. Phenology under global warming. Science 327, 1461–1462 (2010).

    Google Scholar 

  46. Augspurger, C. K. Reconstructing patterns of temperature, phenology, and frost damage over 124 years: spring damage risk is increasing. Ecology 94, 41–50 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  47. Chuine, I., Morin, X. & Bugmann, H. Warming, photoperiods, and tree phenology. Science 329, 277–278 (2010).

    Google Scholar 

  48. Menzel, A. & Fabian, P. Growing season extended in Europe. Nature 397, 659–659 (1999).

    Google Scholar 

  49. Fu, Y. S. H. et al. Increased heat requirement for leaf flushing in temperate woody species over 1980-2012: effects of chilling, precipitation and insolation. Glob. Chang Biol. 21, 2687–2697 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  50. Sierra-Almeida, A., Cavieres, L. A. & Bravo, L. A. Warmer temperatures affect the in situ freezing resistance of the Antarctic vascular plants. Front. Plant Sci. 9, 1456 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  51. Tao, Z. X., Xu, Y. J., Ge, Q. S., Dai, J. H. & Wang, H. J. Reduced frost hardiness in temperate woody species due to climate warming: a model-based analysis. Clim. Change 165, 35 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  52. Visakorpi, K. et al. Leaf-level resistance to frost, drought and heat covaries across European temperate tree seedlings. J. Ecol. 112, 559–574 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  53. Ren, S. et al. Projected soil carbon loss with warming in constrained Earth system models. Nat. Commun. 15, 102 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  54. Qi, Q. et al. More sensitive microbial responses to the interactive effects of warming and altered precipitation in subsoil than topsoil of an alpine grassland ecosystem. Glob. Chang Biol. 30, e17487 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  55. Zhu, E. X. et al. Inactive and inefficient: warming and drought effect on microbial carbon processing in alpine grassland at depth. Glob. Chang Biol. 27, 2241–2253 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  56. Liu, H. Y. Shifting plant species composition in response to climate change stabilizes grassland primary production. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 115, 4051–4056 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  57. Wisniewski, M., Nassuth, A. & Arora, R. Cold hardiness in trees: a mini-review. Front. Plant Sci. 9, 1394 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  58. Repo, T., Wu, D. X. & Hänninen, H. Autumn cold acclimation of shoots does not explain the northern distribution limit of three southern exotic tree species in Finland. Environ. Exp. Bot. 188, 104526 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  59. Rubio-Cuadrado, A. et al. Differential response of oak and beech to late frost damage: an integrated analysis from organ to forest. Agric. Meteorol. 297, 108243 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  60. Fu, Y. S. H., Campioli, M., Oijen, M. V., Deckmyn, G. & Janssens, I. A. Bayesian comparison of six different temperature-based budburst models for four temperate tree species. Ecol. Model. 230, 92–100 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  61. Piao, S. L. et al. Leaf onset in the northern hemisphere triggered by daytime mltemperature. Nat. Commun. 6, 6911 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  62. Hänninen, H. Modelling bud dormancy release in trees from cool and temperate regions. Acta Forestalia Fennica 213, 1–47 (1990).

    Google Scholar 

  63. Fu, Y. S. H. et al. Three times greater weight of daytime than of night-time temperature on leaf unfolding phenology in temperate trees. N. Phytol. 212, 590–597 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  64. Richardson, E. A., Seeley, S. D. & Walker, D. R. A model for estimating the completion of rest for Redhaven and Elberta peach trees. Hortscience 9, 331–332 (1974).

    Google Scholar 

  65. Luedeling, E., Zhang, M., Luedeling, V. & Girvetz, E. H. Sensitivity of winter chill models for fruit and nut trees to climatic changes expected in California’s Central Valley. Agr. Ecosyst. Environ. 133, 23–31 (2009).

    Google Scholar 

  66. Zhang, H., Liu, S., Regnier, P. & Yuan, W. New insights on plant phenological response to temperature revealed from long-term widespread observations in China. Glob. Change Biol. 24, 2066–2078 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  67. Blomberg, S. P., Garland, T. & Ives, A. R. Testing for phylogenetic signal in comparative data: Behavioral traits are more labile. Evolution 57, 717–745 (2003).

    Google Scholar 

  68. Bai, L. et al. Contrasting responses of flowering phenology in C3 and C4 plants shape grassland community structure under global change. Ecol 106, e70139 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  69. Sugihara, G. et al. Detecting causality in complex ecosystems. Sci 338, 496–500 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  70. Clark, A. T. et al. Spatial convergent cross mapping to detect causal relationships from short time series. Ecol 96, 1174–1181 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  71. Liu, H. Y., Lu, C. Y., Wang, S. D., Ren, F. & Wang, H. Climate warming extends growing season but not reproductive phase of terrestrial plants. Glob. Ecol. Biogeogr. 30, 950–960 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  72. Veroniki, A. A. et al. Methods to estimate the between-study variance and its uncertainty in meta-analysis. Res. Synth. Methods 7, 55–79 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  73. Breiman, L. et al. Classification and Regression Trees (Routledge, 2017).

  74. Song, B. et al. Global analysis of floral longevity reveals latitudinal gradients and biotic and abiotic correlates. N. Phytol. 235, 2054–2065 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  75. Muff, S., Nilsen, E. B., O’Hara, R. B. & Nater, C. R. Rewriting results sections in the language of evidence. Trends Ecol. Evol. 37, 203–210 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  76. Liu, H. Y. et al. Phenological mismatches between above- and belowground plant responses to climate warming. Nat. Clim. Change 12, 97–102 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  77. R Core Team. R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing (2021).

  78. Yan, Z. J. et al. Supporting data for ‘Quantifying the trade-off between spring phenology and lethal frost risk: a global meta-analysis.’ Figshare https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.28877072 (2025).

  79. Xie, J. M. et al. Tree Visualization By One Table (tvBOT): a web application for visualizing, modifying and annotating phylogenetic trees. Nucleic Acids Res. 51, W587–W592 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We sincerely thank the editor and the anonymous reviewers for their insightful comments that substantially improved this paper. This research was financially sponsored by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 32130065 to J.-S.H.), National Key Research and Development Program Project (Grant No. 2022YFF0801902 to J.-S.H.).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. State Key Laboratory of Herbage Improvement and Grassland Agro-Ecosystems, College of Pastoral Agriculture Science and Technology, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, China

    Zhengjie Yan, Cheng Chen, Yue Liu, Yujiang Li, Tao Yan, Xin Jing, Hongbiao Zi, Yan Shi & Jin-Sheng He

  2. Zhejiang Tiantong Forest Ecosystem National Observation and Research Station, Institute of Eco-Chongming, Zhejiang Zhoushan Island Ecosystem Observation and Research Station, School of Ecological and Environmental Sciences, East China Normal University, Shanghai, China

    Huiying Liu

  3. State Key Laboratory of Herbage Improvement and Grassland Agro-ecosystems, College of Ecology, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, China

    Hao Wang

  4. Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, USA

    Shuai Ren

  5. State Key Laboratory of Tibetan Plateau Earth System, Environment and Resources (TPESER), Institute of Tibetan Plateau Research, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China

    Tao Wang

  6. Institute of Ecology, College of Urban and Environmental Sciences, and Key Laboratory for Earth Surface Processes of the Ministry of Education, Peking University, Beijing, China

    Jin-Sheng He

Authors
  1. Zhengjie Yan
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Cheng Chen
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Yue Liu
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Yujiang Li
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Huiying Liu
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Hao Wang
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Tao Yan
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Xin Jing
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Shuai Ren
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  10. Hongbiao Zi
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  11. Yan Shi
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  12. Tao Wang
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  13. Jin-Sheng He
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

Z.J.Y. and J.-S.H. conceived the study. Z.J.Y. mobilized and processed data for the meta-analysis. Z.J.Y., Y.L., and Y.J.L. performed all analyses. Z.J.Y. wrote the first version of the paper. C.C., H.Y.L., H.W., T.Y., X.J., S.R., H.B.Z., Y.S., T.W., and J.-S.H. contributed to revisions of the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final version.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jin-Sheng He.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Peer review

Peer review information

Nature Communications thanks Écio Diniz and the other, anonymous, reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work. A peer review file is available.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Supplementary information (download PDF )

Peer Review file (download PDF )

Description of Additional Supplementary Files (download PDF )

Supplementary Data 1 (download PDF )

Reporting Summary (download PDF )

Source data

Source Data (download XLSX )

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if you modified the licensed material. You do not have permission under this licence to share adapted material derived from this article or parts of it. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Yan, Z., Chen, C., Liu, Y. et al. Quantifying the trade-off between spring phenology and lethal frost risk: a meta-analysis. Nat Commun (2026). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-026-70187-8

Download citation

  • Received: 14 May 2025

  • Accepted: 20 February 2026

  • Published: 05 March 2026

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-026-70187-8

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

Download PDF

Advertisement

Explore content

  • Research articles
  • Reviews & Analysis
  • News & Comment
  • Videos
  • Collections
  • Subjects
  • Follow us on Facebook
  • Follow us on X
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed

About the journal

  • Aims & Scope
  • Editors
  • Journal Information
  • Open Access Fees and Funding
  • Calls for Papers
  • Editorial Values Statement
  • Journal Metrics
  • Editors' Highlights
  • Contact
  • Editorial policies
  • Top Articles

Publish with us

  • For authors
  • For Reviewers
  • Language editing services
  • Open access funding
  • Submit manuscript

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

  • Explore articles by subject
  • Find a job
  • Guide to authors
  • Editorial policies

Nature Communications (Nat Commun)

ISSN 2041-1723 (online)

nature.com footer links

About Nature Portfolio

  • About us
  • Press releases
  • Press office
  • Contact us

Discover content

  • Journals A-Z
  • Articles by subject
  • protocols.io
  • Nature Index

Publishing policies

  • Nature portfolio policies
  • Open access

Author & Researcher services

  • Reprints & permissions
  • Research data
  • Language editing
  • Scientific editing
  • Nature Masterclasses
  • Research Solutions

Libraries & institutions

  • Librarian service & tools
  • Librarian portal
  • Open research
  • Recommend to library

Advertising & partnerships

  • Advertising
  • Partnerships & Services
  • Media kits
  • Branded content

Professional development

  • Nature Awards
  • Nature Careers
  • Nature Conferences

Regional websites

  • Nature Africa
  • Nature China
  • Nature India
  • Nature Japan
  • Nature Middle East
  • Privacy Policy
  • Use of cookies
  • Legal notice
  • Accessibility statement
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Your US state privacy rights
Springer Nature

© 2026 Springer Nature Limited

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing