Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Advertisement

Nature Communications
  • View all journals
  • Search
  • My Account Login
  • Content Explore content
  • About the journal
  • Publish with us
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed
  1. nature
  2. nature communications
  3. articles
  4. article
Root wounds facilitate the uptake of microplastics in crop plants
Download PDF
Download PDF
  • Article
  • Open access
  • Published: 05 March 2026

Root wounds facilitate the uptake of microplastics in crop plants

  • Jingjing Yin  ORCID: orcid.org/0009-0004-7144-67951,
  • Xiaozun Li  ORCID: orcid.org/0009-0001-9142-88081,
  • Feng Cui  ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0001-8330-885X2,
  • Yang Yu  ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0002-5109-935X1,
  • Baoshan Xing  ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0003-2028-12953,
  • Fayuan Wang  ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0003-1345-256X4 &
  • …
  • Guoxin Xu  ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0002-9328-05601 

Nature Communications , Article number:  (2026) Cite this article

  • 3595 Accesses

  • 1 Citations

  • 4 Altmetric

  • Metrics details

We are providing an unedited version of this manuscript to give early access to its findings. Before final publication, the manuscript will undergo further editing. Please note there may be errors present which affect the content, and all legal disclaimers apply.

Subjects

  • Ecology
  • Environmental sciences

Abstract

Microplastics can be absorbed by plant roots and enter the food chain. Throughout the plant life cycle, roots frequently encounter various physical injuries. However, whether these prevalent injuries serve as critical pathways for microplastics entry into plants remains unknown. Here, we demonstrate that both shallowly wounded roots (injuries limited to the cortex) and unwounded roots exhibit effective resistance to the penetration of microplastics. In contrast, deep wounds (injuries extending to the stele) in roots provide a rapid pathway for microplastics to enter crops such as taro (Colocasia esculenta) and maize (Zea mays). Microplastics are rapidly transported upward via wound-exposed xylem vessels in both vermiculite and soil culture conditions. When 20% of the roots were subjected to deep wounds and exposed to vermiculite containing 50 mg kg−1 of polystyrene microplastics, the accumulation levels in taro corms reached 161.1 ± 26.4 (1 μm) and 135.6 ± 24.9 (5 μm) items g−1, while in maize stems reached 503.4 ± 147.4 (1 μm) and 222.3 ± 63.8 (5 μm) items g−1. Our findings provide substantial evidence that root wounds facilitate the uptake, translocation, and accumulation of microplastics in crops, underscoring the urgent need for proper farming practices to prevent root injuries and enhance food safety.

Similar content being viewed by others

Microplastics and plant health: a comprehensive review of sources, distribution, toxicity, and remediation

Article Open access 12 August 2025

Assessment of physiological stress on plants grown in soil contaminated with microplastics

Article Open access 10 October 2025

Plants forage for soil patches free of plastic pollution but cannot bag the profits

Article Open access 28 October 2023

Data availability

All data generated or analysed during this study are included in the Article and its Supplementary Information. Source data are provided with this paper.

References

  1. Hartmann, N. B. et al. Are we speaking the same language? Recommendations for a definition and categorization framework for plastic debris. Environ. Sci. Technol. 53, 1039–1047 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Gigault, J. et al. Nanoplastics are neither microplastics nor engineered nanoparticles. Nat. Nanotechnol. 16, 501–507 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Rochman, C. M. Microplastics research—from sink to source. Science 360, 28–29 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Thompson, R. C. et al. Twenty years of microplastics pollution research—what have we learned? Science 386, eadl2746 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Kedzierski, M., Cirederf-Boulant, D., Palazot, M., Yvin, M. & Bruzaud, S. Continents of plastics: an estimate of the stock of microplastics in agricultural soils. Sci. Total Environ. 880, 163294 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Wang, Y., Hou, P., Liu, K., Hayat, K. & Liu, W. Depth distribution of nano-and microplastics and their contribution to carbon storage in Chinese agricultural soils. Sci. Total Environ. 913, 169709 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Wang, F., Wang, Q., Adams, C. A., Sun, Y. & Zhang, S. Effects of microplastics on soil properties: current knowledge and future perspectives. J. Hazard. Mater. 424, 127531 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Wang, F. et al. Micro(nano)plastics and terrestrial plants: Up-to-date knowledge on uptake, translocation, and phytotoxicity. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 185, 106503 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Wang, F., Pei, L., Zhang, S., Sun, J. & Han, L. Microplastics affect ecosystem multifunctionality: Increasing evidence from soil enzyme activities. Land Degrad. Dev. 35, 4379–4405 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Zhou, Y. et al. Nanoplastics alter ecosystem multifunctionality and may increase global warming potential. Glob. Chang. Biol. 29, 3895–3909 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Chen, L. et al. Micro/nanoplastics pollution poses a potential threat to soil health. Glob. Chang. Biol. 30, e17470 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  12. Azeem, I. et al. Microplastic and nanoplastic interactions with plant species: trends, meta-analysis, and perspectives. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. 9, 482–492 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  13. Zantis, L. J. et al. Nano- and microplastics commonly cause adverse impacts on plants at environmentally relevant levels: A systematic review. Sci. Total Environ. 867, 161211 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  14. Yu, Z., Xu, X., Guo, L., Jin, R. & Lu, Y. Uptake and transport of micro/nanoplastics in terrestrial plants: Detection, mechanisms, and influencing factors. Sci. Total Environ. 907, 168155 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  15. Winiarska, E., Jutel, M. & Zemelka-Wiacek, M. The potential impact of nano-and microplastics on human health: Understanding human health risks. Environ. Res. 251, 118535 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  16. Schwab, F., Rothen-Rutishauser, B. & Petri-Fink, A. When plants and plastic interact. Nat. Nanotechnol. 15, 729–730 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  17. Taylor, S. E. et al. Polystyrene nano-and microplastic accumulation at Arabidopsis and wheat root cap cells, but no evidence for uptake into roots. Environ. Sci: Nano 7, 1942–1953 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  18. Gao, D. et al. Polystyrene nanoplastics’ accumulation in roots induces adverse physiological and molecular effects in water spinach Ipomoea aquatica Forsk. Sci. Total Environ. 872, 162278 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  19. Li, L. et al. Effective uptake of submicrometre plastics by crop plants via a crack-entry mode. Nat. Sustain. 3, 929–937 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  20. Omary, M., Matosevich, R. & Efroni, I. Systemic control of plant regeneration and wound repair. N. Phytol. 237, 408–413 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  21. Wang, J. et al. Tillage and irrigation increase wheat root systems at deep soil layer and grain yields in lime concretion black soil. Sci. Rep. 11, 6394 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  22. Hu, C. et al. Root pruning enhances wheat yield, harvest index and water-use efficiency in semiarid area. Field Crop. Res. 230, 62–71 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  23. Geisler, D. & Ferree, D. C. Response of plants to root pruning. Hort. Rev. 6, 155–188 (1984).

    Google Scholar 

  24. Johnson, S. N., Erb, M. & Hartley, S. E. Roots under attack: contrasting plant responses to below- and aboveground insect herbivory. N. Phytol. 210, 413–418 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  25. Bigras, F. J. & Dumais, D. Root-freezing damage in the containerized nursery: impact on plantation sites – A review. New For 30, 167–184 (2005).

  26. Gardiner, B., Berry, P. & Moulia, B. Wind impacts on plant growth, mechanics and damage. Plant Sci. 245, 94–118 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  27. Bostock, R. & Stermer, B. Perspectives on wound healing in resistance to pathogens. Annu. Rev. Phytopathol. 27, 343–371 (1989).

    Google Scholar 

  28. Wu, J. et al. Polystyrene microplastic interaction with Oryza sativa: toxicity and metabolic mechanism. Environ. Sci. Nano 8, 3699–3710 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  29. Urbina, M. A., Correa, F., Aburto, F. & Ferrio, J. P. Adsorption of polyethylene microbeads and physiological effects on hydroponic maize. Sci. Total Environ. 741, 140216 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  30. Benfey, P. N. & Scheres, B. Root development. Curr. Biol. 10, R813–R815 (2000).

    Google Scholar 

  31. Liu, T. & Kreszies, T. The exodermis: A forgotten but promising apoplastic barrier. J. Plant Physiol. 290, 154118 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  32. Kreszies, T., Schreiber, L. & Ranathunge, K. Suberized transport barriers in Arabidopsis, barley and rice roots: From the model plant to crop species. J. Plant Physiol. 227, 75–83 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  33. Perumalla, C. J., Peterson, C. A. & Enstone, D. E. A survey of angiosperm species to detect hypodermal Casparian bands. I. Roots with a uniseriate hypodermis and epidermis. Bot. J. Linn. Soc. 103, 93–112 (1990).

    Google Scholar 

  34. Venturas, M. D., Sperry, J. S. & Hacke, U. G. Plant xylem hydraulics: what we understand, current research, and future challenges. J. Integr. Plant Biol. 59, 356–389 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  35. Sun, X.-D. et al. Differentially charged nanoplastics demonstrate distinct accumulation in Arabidopsis thaliana. Nat. Nanotechnol. 15, 755–760 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  36. Liu, Y., Guo, R., Zhang, S., Sun, Y. & Wang, F. Uptake and translocation of nano/microplastics by rice seedlings: Evidence from a hydroponic experiment. J. Hazard. Mater. 421, 126700 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  37. Pérez-Reverón, R. et al. Nanoplastics in the soil environment: analytical methods, occurrence, fate and ecological implications. Environ. Pollut. 317, 120788 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  38. Kamon, E. & Ohtani, M. Xylem vessel cell differentiation: a best model for new integrative cell biology? Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 64, 102135 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  39. Shi, H., Liu, Y., Ding, A., Wang, W. & Sun, Y. Induced defense strategies of plants against Ralstonia solanacearum. Front. Microbiol. 14, 1059799 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  40. Ušák, D., Haluška, S. & Pleskot, R. Callose synthesis at the center point of plant development—an evolutionary insight. Plant Physiol. 193, 54–69 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  41. Kang, Q., Zhang, K., Dekker, S. C. & Mao, J. Microplastics in soils: a comprehensive review. Sci. Total Environ. 960, 178298 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  42. Ourgaud, M. et al. Identification and quantification of microplastics in the marine environment using the laser direct infrared (LDIR) technique. Environ. Sci. Technol. 56, 9999–10009 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  43. Zhao, J. et al. Microplastic fragmentation by rotifers in aquatic ecosystems contributes to global nanoplastic pollution. Nat. Nanotechnol. 19, 406–414 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  44. Ziemann, S. et al. Novel release mechanism of microplastics and nanoplastics by environmentally relevant sand abrasion. Environ. Sci. Technol. 59, 20684–20694 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  45. Kounina, A. et al. The global apparel industry is a significant yet overlooked source of plastic leakage. Nat. Commun. 15, 5022 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  46. Järlskog, I. et al. Concentrations of tire wear microplastics and other traffic-derived non-exhaust particles in the road environment. Environ. Int. 170, 107618 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  47. Weithmann, N. et al. Organic fertilizer as a vehicle for the entry of microplastic into the environment. Sci. Adv. 4, eaap8060 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  48. Li, Q., Bogush, A., Van De Wiel, M., Wu, P. & Holtzman, R. Microplastics transport in soils: A critical review. Earth Sci. Rev. 264, 105108 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  49. Zhang, H., Huang, Y., An, S. & Zhu, Z. A review of microplastics in soil: distribution within pedosphere compartments, environmental fate, and effects. Water Air Soil Pollut. 233, 380 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  50. Ren, S. et al. Potential sources and occurrence of macro-plastics and microplastics pollution in farmland soils: A typical case of China. Crit. Rev. Env. Sci. Tec. 54, 533–556 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  51. Jiang, M. et al. Evidence and impacts of nanoplastic accumulation on crop grains. Adv. Sci. 9, e2202336 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  52. Yin, J., Zhu, T., Li, X., Wang, F. & Xu, G. Phytoremediation of microplastics by water hyacinth. Environ. Sci. Ecotechnol. 24, 100540 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  53. Xu, G., Li, X., Zhu, T., Wang, F. & Yin, J. When nano- and microplastics meet taro (Colocasia esculenta) roots: their size-dependent adsorption, penetration, and promotion on secondary wall reinforcement. Environ. Sci. Technol. 59, 8345–8356 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This research was supported by the Agricultural Science & Technology Innovation Project of Shandong Academy of Agricultural Sciences (CXGC2026A07 and CXGC2026C31 to G.X.), the Key R&D Program of Shandong Province (2022LZGC024 to J.Y.), and Shandong Provincial Natural Science Foundation (ZR2023MC044 to F.C.).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Institute of Wetland Agriculture and Ecology, Shandong Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Ji’nan, Shandong Province, China

    Jingjing Yin, Xiaozun Li, Yang Yu & Guoxin Xu

  2. Institute of Crop Germplasm Resources, Shandong Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Ji’nan, Shandong Province, China

    Feng Cui

  3. Stockbridge School of Agriculture, University of Massachusetts, Amherst, MA, USA

    Baoshan Xing

  4. College of Environment and Safety Engineering, Qingdao University of Science and Technology, Qingdao, Shandong Province, China

    Fayuan Wang

Authors
  1. Jingjing Yin
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Xiaozun Li
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Feng Cui
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Yang Yu
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Baoshan Xing
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Fayuan Wang
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Guoxin Xu
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

G.X. and F.W. conceived the idea, designed the project, analysed the data, and prepared the manuscript together. J.Y. and G.X. conducted all the experiments and wrote the original manuscript. X.L. and F.C. prepared the plant. Y.Y. helped with the manuscript revision and data analysis. B.X. provided guidance on experimental methods and participated in writing and revising the final manuscript.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Baoshan Xing, Fayuan Wang or Guoxin Xu.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Peer review

Peer review information

Nature Communications thanks the anonymous reviewers for their contribution to the peer review of this work. A peer review file is available.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Supplementary information (download PDF )

Peer Review file (download PDF )

Reporting Summary (download PDF )

Source data

Source Data (download XLSX )

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if you modified the licensed material. You do not have permission under this licence to share adapted material derived from this article or parts of it. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Yin, J., Li, X., Cui, F. et al. Root wounds facilitate the uptake of microplastics in crop plants. Nat Commun (2026). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-026-70273-x

Download citation

  • Received: 07 May 2025

  • Accepted: 24 February 2026

  • Published: 05 March 2026

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-026-70273-x

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

Download PDF

Advertisement

Explore content

  • Research articles
  • Reviews & Analysis
  • News & Comment
  • Videos
  • Collections
  • Subjects
  • Follow us on Facebook
  • Follow us on X
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed

About the journal

  • Aims & Scope
  • Editors
  • Journal Information
  • Open Access Fees and Funding
  • Calls for Papers
  • Editorial Values Statement
  • Journal Metrics
  • Editors' Highlights
  • Contact
  • Editorial policies
  • Top Articles

Publish with us

  • For authors
  • For Reviewers
  • Language editing services
  • Open access funding
  • Submit manuscript

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

  • Explore articles by subject
  • Find a job
  • Guide to authors
  • Editorial policies

Nature Communications (Nat Commun)

ISSN 2041-1723 (online)

nature.com footer links

About Nature Portfolio

  • About us
  • Press releases
  • Press office
  • Contact us

Discover content

  • Journals A-Z
  • Articles by subject
  • protocols.io
  • Nature Index

Publishing policies

  • Nature portfolio policies
  • Open access

Author & Researcher services

  • Reprints & permissions
  • Research data
  • Language editing
  • Scientific editing
  • Nature Masterclasses
  • Research Solutions

Libraries & institutions

  • Librarian service & tools
  • Librarian portal
  • Open research
  • Recommend to library

Advertising & partnerships

  • Advertising
  • Partnerships & Services
  • Media kits
  • Branded content

Professional development

  • Nature Awards
  • Nature Careers
  • Nature Conferences

Regional websites

  • Nature Africa
  • Nature China
  • Nature India
  • Nature Japan
  • Nature Middle East
  • Privacy Policy
  • Use of cookies
  • Legal notice
  • Accessibility statement
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Your US state privacy rights
Springer Nature

© 2026 Springer Nature Limited

Nature Briefing Anthropocene

Sign up for the Nature Briefing: Anthropocene newsletter — what matters in anthropocene research, free to your inbox weekly.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing: Anthropocene