Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Advertisement

Nature Communications
  • View all journals
  • Search
  • My Account Login
  • Content Explore content
  • About the journal
  • Publish with us
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed
  1. nature
  2. nature communications
  3. articles
  4. article
Brachiopod genome unveils the evolution of BMP signalling in bilaterian body patterning
Download PDF
Download PDF
  • Article
  • Open access
  • Published: 12 March 2026

Brachiopod genome unveils the evolution of BMP signalling in bilaterian body patterning

  • Thomas D. Lewin1,
  • Tosuke Sakagami1,
  • Keisuke Shimizu2,
  • Li-Jung Kao1,
  • Yi-Ling Chiu1,
  • Isabel Jiah-Yih Liao1,
  • Mu-En Chen1,
  • Kanako Hisata3,
  • Kazuyoshi Endo4,
  • Noriyuki Satoh  ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0002-4480-35723,
  • Peter W. H. Holland  ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0003-1533-93765,
  • Yue Him Wong6 &
  • …
  • Yi-Jyun Luo  ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0002-3418-31461 

Nature Communications , Article number:  (2026) Cite this article

  • 1924 Accesses

  • 1 Altmetric

  • Metrics details

We are providing an unedited version of this manuscript to give early access to its findings. Before final publication, the manuscript will undergo further editing. Please note there may be errors present which affect the content, and all legal disclaimers apply.

Subjects

  • Comparative genomics
  • Evolutionary developmental biology
  • Evolutionary genetics

Abstract

The molecular control and ancestral state of dorsal–ventral patterning within spiralians remain unclear due to the remarkable diversity across species. Here we present a chromosome-level genome for the brachiopod Lingula anatina and apply functional transcriptomics to study dorsal–ventral patterning under BMP signalling control. We uncover asymmetrical activation of BMP signalling at the dorsal side of the gastrula, governed by ventral chordin expression and a ‘seesaw’ of BMP ligands. Using small-molecule drugs and recombinant proteins, we show that high BMP activity inhibits genes typically associated with neural patterning during gastrula and larval stages, similar to deuterostomes and non-spiralian protostomes. Our findings suggest deep conservation of this mechanism across all three major bilaterian clades, supported by striking similarities in BMP-regulated gene sets between brachiopods and Xenopus. We argue that the spiralian ancestor retained the ancestral bilaterian mechanism, although downstream network components have undergone developmental system drift.

Similar content being viewed by others

A collagenous extracellular matrix regulates germline gene expression in the sea star embryo

Article Open access 21 October 2025

Time-integrated BMP signaling determines fate in a stem cell model for early human development

Article Open access 17 February 2024

DPYSL2/CRMP2 isoform B knockout in human iPSC-derived glutamatergic neurons confirms its role in mTOR signaling and neurodevelopmental disorders

Article 21 July 2023

Data availability

Genome sequencing and RNA sequencing datasets are accessible through NCBI BioProject under accession number PRJNA1068743. The L. anatina genome is made available on NCBI with the accession GCA_051362555.1 [https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/datasets/genome/GCA_051362555.1/]. A L. anatina genome browser with a BLAST function is available at https://marinegenomics.oist.jp/lan_3_0/viewer/info?project_id=124. The genome sequence, gene models, and functional annotations from UniProt, Pfam, InterProScan, EggNOG and KOfam are also available at this location. Genomic, transcriptomic and imaging data from this study, including the genome assembly, gene annotations, repeat annotations, gene expression matrices and original Zeiss LSM imaging files, are available on Zenodo (https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.16916709). Source data are provided with this paper.

Code availability

Code for analyses in this study is available on GitHub (https://github.com/symgenoevolab/lingula_genome) and Zenodo (https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18591213).

References

  1. De Robertis, E. M. & Sasai, Y. A common plan for dorsoventral patterning in Bilateria. Nature 380, 37–40 (1996).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Ferguson, E. L. Conservation of dorsal-ventral patterning in arthropods and chordates. Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev. 6, 424–431 (1996).

    Google Scholar 

  3. De Robertis, E. M. Evo-devo: variations on ancestral themes. Cell 132, 185–195 (2008).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Sasai, Y., Lu, B., Steinbeisser, H. & De Robertis, E. M. Regulation of neural induction by the Chd and Bmp-4 antagonistic patterning signals in Xenopus. Nature 377, 757 (1995).

    Google Scholar 

  5. De Robertis, E. M. & Kuroda, H. Dorsal-ventral patterning and neural induction in Xenopus embryos. Annu. Rev. Cell Dev. Biol. 20, 285–308 (2004).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Sasai, Y. et al. Xenopus chordin: a novel dorsalizing factor activated by organizer-specific homeobox genes. Cell 79, 779–790 (1994).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Piccolo, S., Sasai, Y., Lu, B. & De Robertis, E. M. Dorsoventral patterning in Xenopus: inhibition of ventral signals by direct binding of chordin to BMP-4. Cell 86, 589–598 (1996).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Smith, W. C. & Harland, R. M. Expression cloning of noggin, a new dorsalizing factor localized to the Spemann organizer in Xenopus embryos. Cell 70, 829–840 (1992).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Zimmerman, L. B., Jesús-Escobar, J. M. & Harland, R. M. The Spemann organizer signal noggin binds and inactivates bone morphogenetic protein 4. Cell 86, 599–606 (1996).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Ray, R. P., Arora, K., Nüsslein-Volhard, C. & Gelbart, W. M. The control of cell fate along the dorsal–ventral axis of the Drosophila embryo. Development 113, 35–54 (1991).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Ferguson, E. L. & Anderson, K. V. Decapentaplegic acts as a morphogen to organize dorsal-ventral pattern in the Drosophila embryo. Cell 71, 451–461 (1992).

    Google Scholar 

  12. Srinivasan, S., Rashka, K. E. & Bier, E. Creation of a Sog morphogen gradient in the Drosophila embryo. Dev. Cell 2, 91–101 (2002).

    Google Scholar 

  13. Lynch, J. A. & Roth, S. The evolution of dorsal–ventral patterning mechanisms in insects. Genes Dev. 25, 107–118 (2011).

    Google Scholar 

  14. Lowe, C. J. et al. Dorsoventral patterning in hemichordates: insights into early chordate evolution. PLoS Biol. 4, e291 (2006).

    Google Scholar 

  15. Yu, J. K. et al. Axial patterning in cephalochordates and the evolution of the organizer. Nature 445, 613–617 (2007).

    Google Scholar 

  16. Lapraz, F., Besnardeau, L. & Lepage, T. Patterning of the dorsal–ventral axis in echinoderms: insights into the evolution of the BMP–chordin signaling network. PLoS Biol. 7, e1000248 (2009).

    Google Scholar 

  17. Arendt, D. & Nübler-Jung, K. Inversion of dorsoventral axis? Nature 371, 26 (1994).

    Google Scholar 

  18. Shimmi, O., Umulis, D., Othmer, H. & O’Connor, M. B. Facilitated transport of a Dpp/Scw heterodimer by Sog/Tsg leads to robust patterning of the Drosophila blastoderm embryo. Cell 120, 873–886 (2005).

    Google Scholar 

  19. Little, S. C. & Mullins, M. C. Bone morphogenetic protein heterodimers assemble heteromeric type I receptor complexes to pattern the dorsoventral axis. Nat. Cell Biol. 11, 637–643 (2009).

    Google Scholar 

  20. Bauer, M., Aguilar, G., Wharton, K. A., Matsuda, S. & Affolter, M. Heterodimerization-dependent secretion of bone morphogenetic proteins in Drosophila. Dev. Cell 58, 645–659 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  21. Aono, A. et al. Potent ectopic bone-inducing activity of bone morphogenetic protein-4/7 heterodimer. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 210, 670–677 (1995).

    Google Scholar 

  22. Nishimatsu, S. & Thomsen, G. H. Ventral mesoderm induction and patterning by bone morphogenetic protein heterodimers in Xenopus embryos. Mech. Dev. 74, 75–88 (1998).

    Google Scholar 

  23. Massagué, J., Attisano, L. & Wrana, J. L. The TGF-beta family and its composite receptors. Trends Cell Biol. 4, 172–178 (1994).

    Google Scholar 

  24. Hoodless, P. A. MADR1, a MAD-related protein that functions in BMP2 signaling pathways. Cell 85, 489–500 (1996).

    Google Scholar 

  25. Nguyen, M., Park, S., Marqués, G. & Arora, K. Interpretation of a BMP activity gradient in Drosophila embryos depends on synergistic signaling by two type I receptors, SAX and TKV. Cell 95, 495–506 (1998).

    Google Scholar 

  26. Wrana, J. L., Attisano, L., Wieser, R., Ventura, F. & Massagué, J. Mechanism of activation of the TGF-beta receptor. Nature 370, 341–347 (1994).

    Google Scholar 

  27. Liu, F. et al. A human mad protein acting as a BMP-regulated transcriptional activator. Nature 381, 620–623 (1996).

    Google Scholar 

  28. Kretzschmar, M., Liu, F., Hata, A., Doody, J. & Massagué, J. The TGF-beta family mediator Smad1 is phosphorylated directly and activated functionally by the BMP receptor kinase. Genes Dev. 11, 984–995 (1997).

    Google Scholar 

  29. Genikhovich, G. et al. Axis patterning by BMPs: cnidarian network reveals evolutionary constraints. Cell Rep. 10, 1646–1654 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  30. Eldar, A. et al. Robustness of the BMP morphogen gradient in Drosophila embryonic patterning. Nature 419, 304–308 (2002).

    Google Scholar 

  31. Ben-Zvi, D., Shilo, B.-Z., Fainsod, A. & Barkai, N. Scaling of the BMP activation gradient in Xenopus embryos. Nature 453, 1205–1211 (2008).

    Google Scholar 

  32. Mizutani, C. M. et al. Formation of the BMP activity gradient in the Drosophila embryo. Dev. Cell 8, 915–924 (2005).

    Google Scholar 

  33. Johnston, R. D. & Gelbart, W. M. Decapentaplegic transcripts are localized along the dorsal–ventral axis of the Drosophila embryo. EMBO J. 6, 2785–2791 (1987).

    Google Scholar 

  34. Arora, K., Levine, M. S. & O’Connor, M. B. The screw gene encodes a ubiquitously expressed member of the TGF-beta family required for specification of dorsal cell fates in the Drosophila embryo. Genes Dev. 8, 2588–2601 (1994).

    Google Scholar 

  35. Reversade, B. & De Robertis, E. M. Regulation of ADMP and BMP2/4/7 at opposite embryonic poles generates a self-regulating morphogenetic field. Cell 123, 1147–1160 (2005).

    Google Scholar 

  36. Inomata, H., Haraguchi, T. & Sasai, Y. Robust stability of the embryonic axial pattern requires a secreted scaffold for chordin degradation. Cell 134, 854–865 (2008).

    Google Scholar 

  37. Plouhinec, J.-L., Zakin, L. & De Robertis, E. M. Systems control of BMP morphogen flow in vertebrate embryos. Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev. 21, 696–703 (2011).

    Google Scholar 

  38. Lapraz, F., Haillot, E. & Lepage, T. A deuterostome origin of the Spemann organiser suggested by nodal and ADMPs functions in echinoderms. Nat. Commun. 6, 8927 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  39. Finnerty, J. R., Pang, K., Burton, P., Paulson, D. & Martindale, M. Q. Origins of bilateral symmetry: Hox and dpp expression in a sea anemone. Science 304, 1335–1337 (2004).

    Google Scholar 

  40. Matus, D. Q. et al. Molecular evidence for deep evolutionary roots of bilaterality in animal development. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 103, 11195–11200 (2006).

    Google Scholar 

  41. Saina, M., Genikhovich, G., Renfer, E. & Technau, U. BMPs and chordin regulate patterning of the directive axis in a sea anemone. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 106, 18592–18597 (2009).

    Google Scholar 

  42. Mörsdorf, D., Knabl, P. & Genikhovich, G. Highly conserved and extremely evolvable: BMP signalling in secondary axis patterning of cnidaria and Bilateria. Dev. Genes Evol. 234, 1–19 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  43. Genikhovich, G. & Technau, U. On the evolution of bilaterality. Development 144, 3392–3404 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  44. Lowe, C. J., Clarke, D. N., Medeiros, D. M., Rokhsar, D. S. & Gerhart, J. The deuterostome context of chordate origins. Nature 520, 456–465 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  45. Su, Y. H. et al. BMP controls dorsoventral and neural patterning in indirect-developing hemichordates providing insight into a possible origin of chordates. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 116, 12925–12932 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  46. Bier, E. & De Robertis, E. M. BMP gradients: a paradigm for morphogen-mediated developmental patterning. Science 348, aaa5838 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  47. Lyons, D. C., Perry, K. J., Batzel, G. & Henry, J. Q. BMP signaling plays a role in anterior-neural/head development, but not organizer activity, in the gastropod Crepidula fornicata. Dev. Biol. 463, 135–157 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  48. Webster, N. B., Corbet, M., Sur, A. & Meyer, N. P. Role of BMP signaling during early development of the annelid Capitella teleta. Dev. Biol. 478, 183–204 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  49. Kuo, D.-H., Shankland, M. & Weisblat, D. A. Regional differences in BMP-dependence of dorsoventral patterning in the leech Helobdella. Dev. Biol. 368, 86–94 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  50. Lanza, A. R. & Seaver, E. C. Activin/nodal signaling mediates dorsal-ventral axis formation before third quartet formation in embryos of the annelid Chaetopterus pergamentaceus. EvoDevo 11, 17 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  51. Webster, N. B. & Meyer, N. P. Capitella teleta gets left out: possible evolutionary shift causes loss of left tissues rather than increased neural tissue from dominant-negative BMPR1. Neural Dev. 19, 4 (2024).

  52. Lanza, A. R. & Seaver, E. C. Functional evidence that activin/nodal signaling is required for establishing the dorsal–ventral axis in the annelid Capitella teleta. Development 147, dev189373 (2020).

  53. Martín-Zamora, F. M. et al. Annelid functional genomics reveal the origins of bilaterian life cycles. Nature 615, 105–110 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  54. Kenny, N. J. et al. The Lophotrochozoan TGF-β signalling cassette-diversification and conservation in a key signalling pathway. Int. J. Dev. Biol. 58, 533–549 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  55. Lambert, J. D., Johnson, A. B., Hudson, C. N. & Chan, A. Dpp/BMP2-4 mediates signaling from the D-quadrant organizer in a spiralian embryo. Curr. Biol. 26, 2003–2010 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  56. Tan, S., Huan, P. & Liu, B. Molluskan dorsal–ventral patterning relying on BMP2/4 and chordin provides insights into spiralian development and evolution. Mol. Biol. Evol. 39, msab322 (2022).

  57. Carrillo-Baltodano A. M. et al. Developmental system drift in dorsoventral patterning is linked to transitions to autonomous development in Annelida. Preprint at bioRxiv https://doi.org/10.1101/2025.05.29.656861 (2025).

  58. Martín-Durán, J. M., Passamaneck, Y. J., Martindale, M. Q. & Hejnol, A. The developmental basis for the recurrent evolution of deuterostomy and protostomy. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 1, 5 (2016).

  59. Luo, Y.-J. et al. The Lingula genome provides insights into brachiopod evolution and the origin of phosphate biomineralization. Nat. Commun. 6, 8301 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  60. Simakov, O. et al. Insights into bilaterian evolution from three spiralian genomes. Nature 493, 526–531 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  61. Kenny, N. J. et al. The gene-rich genome of the scallop Pecten maximus. Gigascience 9, giaa037 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  62. Kwiatkowski, D. et al. The genome sequence of the bootlace worm, Lineus longissimus (Gunnerus, 1770). Wellcome Open Res. 6, 272 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  63. Nishizawa, A., Sarashina, I., Tsujimoto, Y., IIjima, M. & Endo, K. Artificial fertilization, early development and chromosome numbers in the brachiopod Lingula anatina. Spec. Pap. Palaeontol. 84, 309–316 (2010).

    Google Scholar 

  64. Nesnidal, M. P., Helmkampf, M., Bruchhaus, I. & Hausdorf, B. Compositional heterogeneity and phylogenomic inference of metazoan relationships. Mol. Biol. Evol. 27, 2095–2104 (2010).

    Google Scholar 

  65. Nesnidal, M. P. et al. New phylogenomic data support the monophyly of Lophophorata and an ectoproct–phoronid clade and indicate that polyzoa and kryptrochozoa are caused by systematic bias. BMC Evol. Biol. 13, 253 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  66. Laumer, C. E. et al. Spiralian phylogeny informs the evolution of microscopic lineages. Curr. Biol. 25, 2000–2006 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  67. Luo, Y.-J. et al. Nemertean and phoronid genomes reveal lophotrochozoan evolution and the origin of bilaterian heads. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 2, 141–151 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  68. Santagata, S. Genes with evidence of positive selection as potentially related to coloniality and the evolution of morphological features among the lophophorates and entoprocts. J. Exp. Zool. B Mol. Dev. Evol. 336, 267–280 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  69. Marlétaz, F., Peijnenburg, K. T. C. A., Goto, T., Satoh, N. & Rokhsar, D. S. A new spiralian phylogeny places the enigmatic arrow worms among gnathiferans. Curr. Biol. 29, 312–318.e3 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  70. Zverkov, O. A. et al. Dicyemida and orthonectida: two stories of body plan simplification. Front. Genet. 10, 443 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  71. Lewin, T. D. et al. Phoronid genome supports a monophyletic Lophophorata. Curr. Biol. 35, 5633–5645 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  72. Khalturin, K. et al. Polyzoa is back: the effect of complete gene sets on the placement of Ectoprocta and Entoprocta. Sci. Adv. 8, eabo4400 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  73. Laumer, C. E. et al. Revisiting metazoan phylogeny with genomic sampling of all phyla. Proc. Biol. Sci. 286, 20190831 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  74. Affolter, M., Marty, T., Vigano, M. A. & Jaźwińska, A. Nuclear interpretation of Dpp signaling in Drosophila. EMBO J. 20, 3298–3305 (2001).

    Google Scholar 

  75. Lapraz, F. et al. RTK and TGF-beta signaling pathways genes in the sea urchin genome. Dev. Biol. 300, 132–152 (2006).

    Google Scholar 

  76. Holtzhausen, A. et al. Novel bone morphogenetic protein signaling through Smad2 and Smad3 to regulate cancer progression and development. FASEB J. 28, 1248–1267 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  77. Gaviño, M. A. & Reddien, P. W. A Bmp/Admp regulatory circuit controls maintenance and regeneration of dorsal–ventral polarity in planarians. Curr. Biol. 21, 294–299 (2011).

    Google Scholar 

  78. Ko, B. J. et al. Widespread false gene gains caused by duplication errors in genome assemblies. Genome Biol. 23, 205 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  79. Rhie, A. et al. Towards complete and error-free genome assemblies of all vertebrate species. Nature 592, 737–746 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  80. Simakov, O. et al. Deeply conserved synteny resolves early events in vertebrate evolution. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 4, 820–830 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  81. Simakov, O. et al. Deeply conserved synteny and the evolution of metazoan chromosomes. Sci. Adv. 8, eabi5884 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  82. Lewin, T. D., Liao, I. J.-Y. & Luo, Y.-J. Annelid comparative genomics and the evolution of massive lineage-specific genome rearrangement in bilaterians. Mol. Biol. Evol. 41, msae172 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  83. Lewin, T. D., Liao, I. J.-Y. & Luo, Y.-J. Conservation of bilaterian genome structure is the exception, not the rule. Genome Biol. 26, 247 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  84. Bishop, J. et al. The genome sequence of the sea mat, Membranipora membranacea (Linnaeus, 1767). Wellcome Open Res. 8, 38 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  85. Lewin, T. D. et al. Fusion, fission, and scrambling of the bilaterian genome in bryozoa. Genome Res. 35, 78–92 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  86. Cuny, G. D. et al. Structure-activity relationship study of bone morphogenetic protein (BMP) signaling inhibitors. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 18, 4388–4392 (2008).

    Google Scholar 

  87. Sanvitale, C. E. et al. A new class of small molecule inhibitor of BMP signaling. PLoS ONE 8, e62721 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  88. Luo, Y.-J. & Su, Y.-H. Opposing nodal and BMP signals regulate left–right asymmetry in the sea urchin larva. PLoS Biol. 10, 1001402 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  89. Panchision, D. M. et al. Sequential actions of BMP receptors control neural precursor cell production and fate. Genes Dev. 15, 2094–2110 (2001).

    Google Scholar 

  90. Lawson, K. A. et al. Bmp4 is required for the generation of primordial germ cells in the mouse embryo. Genes Dev. 13, 424–436 (1999).

    Google Scholar 

  91. Hogan, B. L. Bone morphogenetic proteins: multifunctional regulators of vertebrate development. Genes Dev. 10, 1580–1594 (1996).

    Google Scholar 

  92. Yatsu, N. On the development of Lingula anatina. J. Coll. Sci. Imp. Univ. Tokyo 17, 1 (1902).

    Google Scholar 

  93. Pascale, A., Amadio, M. & Quattrone, A. Defining a neuron: neuronal ELAV proteins. Cell. Mol. Life Sci. 65, 128–140 (2008).

    Google Scholar 

  94. Robinow, S. & White, K. The locus elav of Drosophila melanogaster is expressed in neurons at all developmental stages. Dev. Biol. 126, 294–303 (1988).

    Google Scholar 

  95. Acampora, D. et al. Forebrain and midbrain regions are deleted in Otx2-/- mutants due to a defective anterior neuroectoderm specification during gastrulation. Development 121, 3279–3290 (1995).

    Google Scholar 

  96. Pevny, L. & Placzek, M. SOX genes and neural progenitor identity. Curr. Opin. Neurobiol. 15, 7–13 (2005).

    Google Scholar 

  97. Bradford, D., Cole, S. J. & Cooper, H. M. Netrin-1: diversity in development. Int. J. Biochem. Cell Biol. 41, 487–493 (2009).

    Google Scholar 

  98. Zhang, X. et al. Pax6 is a human neuroectoderm cell fate determinant. Cell Stem Cell 7, 90–100 (2010).

    Google Scholar 

  99. Takebayashi-Suzuki, K., Kitayama, A., Terasaka-Iioka, C., Ueno, N. & Suzuki, A. The forkhead transcription factor FoxB1 regulates the dorsal–ventral and anterior–posterior patterning of the ectoderm during early Xenopus embryogenesis. Dev. Biol. 360, 11–29 (2011).

    Google Scholar 

  100. Yao, S. et al. Anaplastic lymphoma kinase is required for neurogenesis in the developing central nervous system of zebrafish. PLoS ONE 8, e63757 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  101. Range, R. Specification and positioning of the anterior neuroectoderm in deuterostome embryos. Genesis 52, 222–234 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  102. Biehs, B., François, V. & Bier, E. The Drosophila short gastrulation gene prevents Dpp from autoactivating and suppressing neurogenesis in the neuroectoderm. Genes Dev. 10, 2922–2934 (1996).

    Google Scholar 

  103. Kelman, Z. PCNA: structure, functions and interactions. Oncogene 14, 629–640 (1997).

    Google Scholar 

  104. Heichman, K. A. & Roberts, J. M. CDC16 controls initiation at chromosome replication origins. Mol. Cell 1, 457–463 (1998).

    Google Scholar 

  105. Paunesku, T. et al. Proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA): ringmaster of the genome. Int. J. Radiat. Biol. 77, 1007–1021 (2001).

    Google Scholar 

  106. Cimprich, K. A. & Cortez, D. ATR: an essential regulator of genome integrity. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 9, 616–627 (2008).

    Google Scholar 

  107. Murakami, T. et al. Stable interaction between the human proliferating cell nuclear antigen loader complex Ctf18-replication factor C (RFC) and DNA polymerase epsilon is mediated by the cohesion-specific subunits, Ctf18, Dcc1, and Ctf8. J. Biol. Chem. 285, 34608–34615 (2010).

    Google Scholar 

  108. Hoitsma, N. M. et al. Structure and function relationships in mammalian DNA polymerases. Cell. Mol. Life Sci. 77, 35–59 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  109. Bochman, M. L. & Schwacha, A. The Mcm complex: unwinding the mechanism of a replicative helicase. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 73, 652–683 (2009).

    Google Scholar 

  110. Gross, R. E. et al. Bone morphogenetic proteins promote astroglial lineage commitment by mammalian subventricular zone progenitor cells. Neuron 17, 595–606 (1996).

    Google Scholar 

  111. Fainsod, A., Steinbeisser, H. & De Robertis, E. M. On the function of BMP-4 in patterning the marginal zone of the Xenopus embryo. EMBO J. 13, 5015–5025 (1994).

    Google Scholar 

  112. Moser, M. et al. BMPER, a novel endothelial cell precursor-derived protein, antagonizes bone morphogenetic protein signaling and endothelial cell differentiation. Mol. Cell. Biol. 23, 5664–5679 (2003).

    Google Scholar 

  113. Oelgeschläger, M., Larraín, J., Geissert, D. & De Robertis, E. M. The evolutionarily conserved BMP-binding protein twisted gastrulation promotes BMP signalling. Nature 405, 757–763 (2000).

    Google Scholar 

  114. Larraín, J. et al. Proteolytic cleavage of chordin as a switch for the dual activities of twisted gastrulation in BMP signaling. Development 128, 4439–4447 (2001).

    Google Scholar 

  115. Oelgeschläger, M. et al. The pro-BMP activity of twisted gastrulation is independent of BMP binding. Development 130, 4047–4056 (2003).

    Google Scholar 

  116. Onichtchouk, D. et al. Silencing of TGF-beta signalling by the pseudoreceptor BAMBI. Nature 401, 480–485 (1999).

    Google Scholar 

  117. Moos, M. Jr, Wang, S. & Krinks, M. Anti-dorsalizing morphogenetic protein is a novel TGF-beta homolog expressed in the Spemann organizer. Development 121, 4293–4301 (1995).

    Google Scholar 

  118. Hemmati-Brivanlou, A., Kelly, O. G. & Melton, D. A. Follistatin, an antagonist of activin, is expressed in the Spemann organizer and displays direct neuralizing activity. Cell 77, 283–295 (1994).

    Google Scholar 

  119. Dosch, R. & Niehrs, C. Requirement for anti-dorsalizing morphogenetic protein in organizer patterning. Mech. Dev. 90, 195–203 (2000).

    Google Scholar 

  120. Suzuki, A. et al. A truncated bone morphogenetic protein receptor affects dorsal–ventral patterning in the early Xenopus embryo. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 91, 10255–10259 (1994).

    Google Scholar 

  121. Ambrosio, A. L. et al. Crossveinless-2 Is a BMP feedback inhibitor that binds chordin/BMP to regulate Xenopus embryonic patterning. Dev. Cell 15, 248–260 (2008).

    Google Scholar 

  122. Domazet-Lošo, T. & Tautz, D. A phylogenetically based transcriptome age index mirrors ontogenetic divergence patterns. Nature 468, 815–818 (2010).

    Google Scholar 

  123. Srivastava, M., Mazza-Curll, K. L., Wolfswinkel, J. C. & Reddien, P. W. Whole-body acoel regeneration is controlled by Wnt and Bmp-Admp signaling. Curr. Biol. 24, 1107–1113 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  124. True, J. R. & Haag, E. S. Developmental system drift and flexibility in evolutionary trajectories. Evol. Dev. 3, 109–119 (2001).

    Google Scholar 

  125. Wang, Y.-C. & Ferguson, E. L. Spatial bistability of Dpp-receptor interactions during Drosophila dorsal–ventral patterning. Nature 434, 229–234 (2005).

    Google Scholar 

  126. Le Petillon, Y. et al. Nodal/activin pathway is a conserved neural induction signal in chordates. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 1, 1192–1200 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  127. Garcia-Fernàndez, J., D’Aniello, S. & Escrivà, H. Organizing chordates with an organizer. BioEssays 29, 619–624 (2007).

    Google Scholar 

  128. Kraus, Y., Fritzenwanker, J. H., Genikhovich, G. & Technau, U. The blastoporal organiser of a sea anemone. Curr. Biol. 17, R874–R876 (2007).

    Google Scholar 

  129. Kraus, Y., Aman, A., Technau, U. & Genikhovich, G. Pre-bilaterian origin of the blastoporal axial organizer. Nat. Commun. 7, 11694 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  130. Knabl, P., Ordoñez, J. F., Montenegro Cabrera, J. D., Wollesen, T. & Genikhovich, G. The anti-neural role of BMP signaling is a side effect of its global function in dorsoventral patterning. Preprint at bioRxiv https://doi.org/10.1101/2025.06.08.658475 (2025).

  131. Martín-Durán, J. M. et al. Convergent evolution of bilaterian nerve cords. Nature 553, 45–50 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  132. Martín-Durán, J. M. & Hejnol, A. A developmental perspective on the evolution of the nervous system. Dev. Biol. 475, 181–192 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  133. Kuo, D.-H. & Weisblat, D. A. A new molecular logic for BMP-mediated dorsoventral patterning in the leech Helobdella. Curr. Biol. 21, 1282–1288 (2011).

    Google Scholar 

  134. Nielsen, C. Some aspects of spiralian development. Acta Zool. 91, 20–28 (2010).

    Google Scholar 

  135. Hejnol, A. A twist in time—the evolution of spiral cleavage in the light of animal phylogeny. Integr. Comp. Biol. 50, 695–706 (2010).

    Google Scholar 

  136. Henry, J. Q. Spiralian model systems. Int. J. Dev. Biol. 58, 389–401 (2014).

  137. Amiel, A. R., Henry, J. Q. & Seaver, E. C. An organizing activity is required for head patterning and cell fate specification in the polychaete annelid Capitella teleta: new insights into cell-cell signaling in Lophotrochozoa. Dev. Biol. 379, 107–122 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  138. van den Biggelaar, J. A. Development of dorsoventral polarity and mesentoblast determination in Patella vulgata. J. Morphol. 154, 157–186 (1977).

    Google Scholar 

  139. Lanza, A. R. & Seaver, E. C. An organizing role for the TGF-β signaling pathway in axes formation of the annelid Capitella teleta. Dev. Biol. 435, 26–40 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  140. Lambert, J. D. Developmental patterns in spiralian embryos. Curr. Biol. 20, 72–77 (2010).

    Google Scholar 

  141. Martín-Durán, J. M. & Marlétaz, F. Unravelling spiral cleavage. Development 147, dev181081 (2020).

  142. Henry, J. J. & Martindale, M. Q. Conservation and innovation in spiralian development. Hydrobiologia 402, 255–265 (1999).

    Google Scholar 

  143. Seaver, E. C. Variation in spiralian development: insights from polychaetes. Int. J. Dev. Biol. 58, 457–467 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  144. Tagawa, K., Nishino, A., Humphreys, T. & Satoh, N. The spawning and early development of the Hawaiian acorn worm (hemichordate), Ptychodera flava. Zool. Sci. 15, 85–91 (1998).

    Google Scholar 

  145. Andrews, S. FastQC: a quality control tool for high throughput sequence data. http://www.bioinformatics.babraham.ac.uk/projects/fastqc/ (2010).

  146. Bolger, A. M., Lohse, M. & Usadel, B. Trimmomatic: a flexible trimmer for Illumina sequence data. Bioinformatics 30, 2114–2120 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  147. Dobin, A. et al. STAR: ultrafast universal RNA-seq aligner. Bioinformatics 29, 15–21 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  148. Bray, N. L., Pimentel, H., Melsted, P. & Pachter, L. Near-optimal probabilistic RNA-seq quantification. Nat. Biotechnol. 34, 525–527 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  149. Cheng, H., Concepcion, G. T., Feng, X., Zhang, H. & Li, H. Haplotype-resolved de novo assembly using phased assembly graphs with hifiasm. Nat. Methods 18, 170–175 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  150. Guan, D. et al. Identifying and removing haplotypic duplication in primary genome assemblies. Bioinformatics 36, 2896–2898 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  151. Rao, S. S. et al. A 3D map of the human genome at kilobase resolution reveals principles of chromatin looping. Cell 159, 1665–1680 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  152. Burton, J. N. et al. Chromosome-scale scaffolding of de novo genome assemblies based on chromatin interactions. Nat. Biotechnol. 31, 1119–1125 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  153. Vasimuddin, M., Misra, S., Li, H. & Aluru, S. Efficient architecture-aware acceleration of BWA-MEM for multicore systems. In Proc. International Parallel and Distributed Processing Symposium 314–324 (IEEE, 2019).

  154. Durand, N. C. et al. Juicer provides a one-click system for analyzing loop-resolution Hi-C experiments. Cell Syst. 3, 95–98 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  155. Dudchenko, O. et al. De novo assembly of the Aedes aegypti genome using Hi-C yields chromosome-length scaffolds. Science 356, 92–95 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  156. Durand, N. C. et al. Juicebox provides a visualization system for Hi-C contact maps with unlimited zoom. Cell Syst. 3, 99–101 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  157. Buchfink, B., Reuter, K. & Drost, H.-G. Sensitive protein alignments at tree-of-life scale using DIAMOND. Nat. Methods 18, 366–368 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  158. Kim, D., Paggi, J. M., Park, C., Bennett, C. & Salzberg, S. L. Graph-based genome alignment and genotyping with HISAT2 and HISAT-genotype. Nat. Biotechnol. 37, 907–915 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  159. Challis, R., Richards, E., Rajan, J., Cochrane, G. & Blaxter, M. B. Interactive quality assessment of genome assemblies. G3 10, 1361–1374 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  160. Flynn, J. M. et al. RepeatModeler2 for automated genomic discovery of transposable element families. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 117, 9451–9457 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  161. Price, A. L., Jones, N. C. & Pevzner, P. A. De novo identification of repeat families in large genomes. Bioinformatics 21, 351–358 (2005).

    Google Scholar 

  162. Bao, Z. & Eddy, S. R. Automated de novo identification of repeat sequence families in sequenced genomes. Genome Res. 12, 1269–1276 (2002).

    Google Scholar 

  163. Ellinghaus, D., Kurtz, S. & Willhoeft, U. LTRharvest, an efficient and flexible software for de novo detection of LTR retrotransposons. BMC Bioinform. 9, 18 (2008).

    Google Scholar 

  164. Ou, S. & Jiang, N. LTR_retriever: a highly accurate and sensitive program for identification of long terminal repeat retrotransposons. Plant Physiol. 176, 1410–1422 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  165. Hoff, K. J., Lomsadze, A., Borodovsky, M. & Stanke, M. Whole-genome annotation with BRAKER. Methods Mol. Biol. 1962, 65–95 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  166. Brůna, T., Hoff, K. J., Lomsadze, A., Stanke, M. & Borodovsky, M. BRAKER2: automatic eukaryotic genome annotation with GeneMark-EP+ and AUGUSTUS supported by a protein database. NAR Genom. Bioinform. 3, lqaa108 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  167. Hoff, K. J., Lange, S., Lomsadze, A., Borodovsky, M. & Stanke, M. B. Unsupervised RNA-seq-based genome annotation with GeneMark-ET and AUGUSTUS. Bioinformatics 32, 767–769 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  168. Li, H. et al. The sequence alignment/map format and SAMtools. Bioinformatics 25, 2078–2079 (2009).

    Google Scholar 

  169. Barnett, D. W., Garrison, E. K., Quinlan, A. R., Strömberg, M. P. & Marth, G. T. BamTools: a C++ API and toolkit for analyzing and managing BAM files. Bioinformatics 27, 1691–1692 (2011).

    Google Scholar 

  170. Lomsadze, A., Burns, P. D. & Borodovsky, M. Integration of mapped RNA-Seq reads into automatic training of eukaryotic gene finding algorithm. Nucleic Acids Res. 42, e119 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  171. Buchfink, B., Xie, C. & Huson, D. H. Fast and sensitive protein alignment using DIAMOND. Nat. Methods 12, 59–60 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  172. Stanke, M., Diekhans, M., Baertsch, R. & Haussler, D. Using native and syntenically mapped cDNA alignments to improve de novo gene finding. Bioinformatics 24, 637–644 (2008).

    Google Scholar 

  173. Stanke, M., Schöffmann, O., Morgenstern, B. & Waack, S. Gene prediction in eukaryotes with a generalized hidden Markov model that uses hints from external sources. BMC Bioinforma. 7, 62 (2006).

    Google Scholar 

  174. Smit, A. F. A., Hubley, R. & Green, P. RepeatMasker Open-4.0. http://www.repeatmasker.org (2015).

  175. Simão, F. A., Waterhouse, R. M., Ioannidis, P., Kriventseva, E. V. & Zdobnov, E. M. BUSCO: assessing genome assembly and annotation completeness with single-copy orthologs. Bioinformatics 31, 3210–3212 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  176. Jones, P. et al. InterProScan 5: genome-scale protein function classification. Bioinformatics 30, 1236–1240 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  177. Aramaki, T. et al. KofamKOALA: KEGG ortholog assignment based on profile HMM and adaptive score threshold. Bioinformatics 36, 2251–2252 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  178. Huerta-Cepas, J. et al. eggNOG 5.0: a hierarchical, functionally and phylogenetically annotated orthology resource based on 5090 organisms and 2502 viruses. Nucleic Acids Res. 47, 309–314 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  179. Cantalapiedra, C. P., Hernández-Plaza, A., Letunic, I., Bork, P. & Huerta-Cepas, J. eggNOG-mapper v2: functional annotation, orthology assignments, and domain prediction at the metagenomic scale. Mol. Biol. Evol. 38, 5825–5829 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  180. Emms, D. M. & Kelly, S. OrthoFinder: phylogenetic orthology inference for comparative genomics. Genome Biol. 20, 238 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  181. Hao, Z. et al. RIdeogram: drawing SVG graphics to visualize and map genome-wide data on the idiograms. PeerJ Comput. Sci. 6, e251 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  182. Steenwyk, J. L. et al. OrthoSNAP: a tree splitting and pruning algorithm for retrieving single-copy orthologs from gene family trees. PLoS Biol. 20, e3001827 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  183. Katoh, K. & Standley, D. M. MAFFT multiple sequence alignment software version 7: improvements in performance and usability. Mol. Biol. Evol. 30, 772–780 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  184. Katoh, K., Misawa, K., Kuma, K.-I. & Miyata, T. MAFFT: a novel method for rapid multiple sequence alignment based on fast Fourier transform. Nucleic Acids Res 30, 3059–3066 (2002).

    Google Scholar 

  185. Steenwyk, J. L. et al. ClipKIT: a multiple sequence alignment trimming software for accurate phylogenomic inference. PLoS Biol. 18, e3001007 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  186. Minh, B. Q. et al. IQ-TREE 2: new models and efficient methods for phylogenetic inference in the genomic era. Mol. Biol. Evol. 37, 1530–1534 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  187. Kalyaanamoorthy, S., Minh, B. Q., Wong, T. K. F., Haeseler, A. & Jermiin, L. S. ModelFinder: fast model selection for accurate phylogenetic estimates. Nat. Methods 14, 587–589 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  188. Hoang, D. T., Chernomor, O., Haeseler, A., Minh, B. Q. & Vinh, L. S. UFBoot2: improving the ultrafast bootstrap approximation. Mol. Biol. Evol. 35, 518–522 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  189. Steenwyk, J. L. et al. PhyKIT: a broadly applicable UNIX shell toolkit for processing and analyzing phylogenomic data. Bioinformatics 37, 2325–2331 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  190. Mendes, F. K., Vanderpool, D., Fulton, B. & Hahn, M. W. CAFE 5 models variation in evolutionary rates among gene families. Bioinformatics 36, 5516–5518 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  191. Vences, M. et al. iTaxoTools 0.1: kickstarting a specimen-based software toolkit for taxonomists. Megataxa 6, 77–92 (2021).

  192. Sanderson, M. J. r8s: inferring absolute rates of molecular evolution and divergence times in the absence of a molecular clock. Bioinformatics 19, 301–302 (2003).

    Google Scholar 

  193. Yu, P. B. et al. Dorsomorphin inhibits BMP signals required for embryogenesis and iron metabolism. Nat. Chem. Biol. 4, 33–41 (2008).

    Google Scholar 

  194. Yu, P. B. et al. BMP type I receptor inhibition reduces heterotopic ossification. Nat. Med. 14, 1363–1369 (2008).

    Google Scholar 

  195. Haas, B. J. et al. De novo transcript sequence reconstruction from RNA-seq using the Trinity platform for reference generation and analysis. Nat. Protoc. 8, 1494–1512 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  196. Robinson, M. D., McCarthy, D. J. & Smyth, G. K. edgeR: a Bioconductor package for differential expression analysis of digital gene expression data. Bioinformatics 26, 139–140 (2010).

    Google Scholar 

  197. Law, C. W., Chen, Y., Shi, W. & Smyth, G. K. voom: precision weights unlock linear model analysis tools for RNA-seq read counts. Genome Biol. 15, R29 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  198. UniProt Consortium UniProt: the universal protein knowledgebase in 2023. Nucleic Acids Res. 51, 523–531 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  199. Domazet-Loso, T., Brajković, J. & Tautz, D. A phylostratigraphy approach to uncover the genomic history of major adaptations in metazoan lineages. Trends Genet. 23, 533–539 (2007).

    Google Scholar 

  200. Barrera-Redondo, J., Lotharukpong, J. S., Drost, H.-G. & Coelho, S. M. Uncovering gene-family founder events during major evolutionary transitions in animals, plants and fungi using GenEra. Genome Biol. 24, 54 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  201. Drost, H.-G., Gabel, A., Liu, J., Quint, M. & Grosse, I. myTAI: evolutionary transcriptomics with R. Bioinformatics 34, 1589–1590 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We acknowledge the permission from Amami City, Kagoshima, Japan, for collecting L. anatina specimens. We thank Ryo Koyanagi in the OIST DNA Sequencing Section for his support of RNA sequencing and Asuka Sentoku for support with the embryonic experiment at the University of Ryukyu. We also thank Keisuke Nakashima for a gift of chitin-binding probes and Jr-Kai Yu for support with microscopy. We are grateful to Konstantin Khalturin for facilitating the shipment of fixed embryos from Japan to the USA and to D. Marcela Bolaños for handling the shipment from the USA to Taiwan. This work was supported in part by multiple funding sources over the past decade, including a Japan Society for the Promotion of Science Grant-in-Aid for JSPS Research Fellows (15J01101), a Royal Society Newton International Fellowship (NIF\R1\201315), an Academia Sinica Career Development Award (AS-CDA-112-L06), an Academia Sinica Grand Challenge Program Seed Grant (AS-GCS-114-L08), and National Science and Technology Council Research Project Grants (113-2311-B-001-026 and 114-2311-B-001-024-MY3) to Y.-J.L., T.S. was supported by a JSPS Overseas Research Fellowship. Y.H.W. was supported by the Innovation Team Project of Universities in Guangdong Province (2023KCXTD028) and the National Natural Science Foundation of China General Program (42276104). We thank the Symbiosis Genomics and Evolution Lab members for their assistance and support, and three anonymous reviewers for their insightful comments.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Biodiversity Research Center, Academia Sinica, Taipei, Taiwan

    Thomas D. Lewin, Tosuke Sakagami, Li-Jung Kao, Yi-Ling Chiu, Isabel Jiah-Yih Liao, Mu-En Chen & Yi-Jyun Luo

  2. Research Institute for Global Change, Japan Agency for Marine Science and Technology, Kanagawa, Japan

    Keisuke Shimizu

  3. Marine Genomics Unit, Okinawa Institute of Science and Technology Graduate University, Okinawa, Japan

    Kanako Hisata & Noriyuki Satoh

  4. Department of Earth and Planetary Science, Graduate School of Sciences, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan

    Kazuyoshi Endo

  5. Department of Biology, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK

    Peter W. H. Holland

  6. Institute for Advanced Study, Shenzhen University, Shenzhen, China

    Yue Him Wong

Authors
  1. Thomas D. Lewin
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Tosuke Sakagami
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Keisuke Shimizu
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Li-Jung Kao
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Yi-Ling Chiu
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Isabel Jiah-Yih Liao
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Mu-En Chen
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Kanako Hisata
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Kazuyoshi Endo
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  10. Noriyuki Satoh
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  11. Peter W. H. Holland
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  12. Yue Him Wong
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  13. Yi-Jyun Luo
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

T.D.L., Y.-J.L. conceived the project. K.S., K.E., N.S. and Y.-J.L. collected specimens. Y.H.W. sequenced the chromosome-scale genome and tissue transcriptomes. T.D.L. and M.-E.C. annotated the genomes. Y.-J.L. conducted embryonic experiments and functional transcriptomics. T.S., K.S., L.-J.K., Y.-L.C. and Y.-J.L. performed whole mount in situ hybridisation. T.D.L., I.J.-Y.L. and Y.-J.L. prepared code for GitHub. K.H. prepared the genome browser. T.D.L. and Y.-J.L. analysed data and wrote the manuscript. K.E., P.W.H.H. and Y.H.W. discussed the results and edited the manuscript. All authors contributed to the revision of the manuscript.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Yue Him Wong or Yi-Jyun Luo.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Peer review

Peer review information

Nature Communications thanks Néva Meyer and the other anonymous reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work. A peer review file is available.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Information (download PDF )

Peer Review File (download PDF )

Description of Additional Supplementary Files (download PDF )

Supplementary Data 1–40 (download XLSX )

Reporting Summary (download PDF )

Source data

Source Data (download XLSX )

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Lewin, T.D., Sakagami, T., Shimizu, K. et al. Brachiopod genome unveils the evolution of BMP signalling in bilaterian body patterning. Nat Commun (2026). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-026-70403-5

Download citation

  • Received: 03 June 2024

  • Accepted: 25 February 2026

  • Published: 12 March 2026

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-026-70403-5

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

Download PDF

Advertisement

Explore content

  • Research articles
  • Reviews & Analysis
  • News & Comment
  • Videos
  • Collections
  • Subjects
  • Follow us on Facebook
  • Follow us on X
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed

About the journal

  • Aims & Scope
  • Editors
  • Journal Information
  • Open Access Fees and Funding
  • Calls for Papers
  • Editorial Values Statement
  • Journal Metrics
  • Editors' Highlights
  • Contact
  • Editorial policies
  • Top Articles

Publish with us

  • For authors
  • For Reviewers
  • Language editing services
  • Open access funding
  • Submit manuscript

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

  • Explore articles by subject
  • Find a job
  • Guide to authors
  • Editorial policies

Nature Communications (Nat Commun)

ISSN 2041-1723 (online)

nature.com footer links

About Nature Portfolio

  • About us
  • Press releases
  • Press office
  • Contact us

Discover content

  • Journals A-Z
  • Articles by subject
  • protocols.io
  • Nature Index

Publishing policies

  • Nature portfolio policies
  • Open access

Author & Researcher services

  • Reprints & permissions
  • Research data
  • Language editing
  • Scientific editing
  • Nature Masterclasses
  • Research Solutions

Libraries & institutions

  • Librarian service & tools
  • Librarian portal
  • Open research
  • Recommend to library

Advertising & partnerships

  • Advertising
  • Partnerships & Services
  • Media kits
  • Branded content

Professional development

  • Nature Awards
  • Nature Careers
  • Nature Conferences

Regional websites

  • Nature Africa
  • Nature China
  • Nature India
  • Nature Japan
  • Nature Middle East
  • Privacy Policy
  • Use of cookies
  • Legal notice
  • Accessibility statement
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Your US state privacy rights
Springer Nature

© 2026 Springer Nature Limited

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing