Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Advertisement

Nature Communications
  • View all journals
  • Search
  • My Account Login
  • Content Explore content
  • About the journal
  • Publish with us
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed
  1. nature
  2. nature communications
  3. articles
  4. article
Unveiling the thermodynamic-kinetic trade-off effect on acid sites in zeolite-catalyzed alcohol dehydration
Download PDF
Download PDF
  • Article
  • Open access
  • Published: 09 March 2026

Unveiling the thermodynamic-kinetic trade-off effect on acid sites in zeolite-catalyzed alcohol dehydration

  • Min Hu  ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0001-7096-93411 na1,
  • Yueying Chu  ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0002-6069-53721 na1,
  • Chao Wang  ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0002-6079-23911,
  • Wenjin Cai  ORCID: orcid.org/0009-0001-1290-79321,2,
  • Qiang Wang  ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0001-7741-37331,
  • Jun Xu  ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0003-2741-381X1 &
  • …
  • Feng Deng  ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0002-6461-71521 

Nature Communications , Article number:  (2026) Cite this article

  • 1969 Accesses

  • Metrics details

We are providing an unedited version of this manuscript to give early access to its findings. Before final publication, the manuscript will undergo further editing. Please note there may be errors present which affect the content, and all legal disclaimers apply.

Subjects

  • Heterogeneous catalysis
  • Solid-state NMR

Abstract

Understanding the distinct roles of Brønsted and Lewis acid sites remains a great challenge in designing zeolite catalysts, as their coexistence often obscures mechanistic understanding. Here, we combine solid-state NMR spectroscopy with density functional theory to elucidate the site-specific pathways of ethanol dehydration to ethylene over ZSM-5 zeolite. Two key intermediates are identified: chemisorbed ethanol on Lewis acid sites (LAS) and surface ethoxy species on Brønsted acid sites (BAS), both formed via -OH activation followed by β-H elimination to yield ethylene. Comparative analysis reveals a thermodynamic–kinetic trade-off between the two sites. LAS facilitates low-temperature -OH activation but exhibits high barriers for β-H elimination, limiting ethylene formation. In contrast, BAS requires higher activation energy for -OH activation but enables more facile β-H elimination, promoting ethylene production. This intrinsic trade-off, governed by the thermodynamics of -OH activation, provides a mechanistic basis for understanding and tuning alcohol dehydration on zeolite acid sites.

Similar content being viewed by others

Unveiling the Brønsted acid mechanism for Meerwein–Ponndorf–Verley reduction in methanol conversion over ZSM-5

Article Open access 09 October 2024

Methylations with methanol via bioinspired catalytic C–O bond cleavage

Article Open access 01 July 2025

Elemental zoning enhances mass transport in zeolite catalysts for methanol to hydrocarbons

Article 16 March 2023

Data availability

All data supporting the findings of this study are available within the article and Supplementary Information files. All data are available from the corresponding author upon request. Source data are provided in this paper.

References

  1. Yarulina, I., Chowdhury, A. D., Meirer, F., Weckhuysen, B. M. & Gascon, J. Recent trends and fundamental insights in the methanol-to-hydrocarbons process. Nat. Catal. 1, 398–411 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Tian, P., Wei, Y., Ye, M. & Liu, Z. Methanol to olefins (MTO): from fundamentals to commercialization. ACS Catal. 5, 1922–1938 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Zhang, M. & Yu, Y. Dehydration of Ethanol to Ethylene. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 52, 9505–9514 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Ouayloul, L., Agirrezabal-Telleria, I., Sebastien, P. & El Doukkali, M. Trend and progress in catalysis for ethylene production from bioethanol using ZSM-5. ACS Catal 14, 17360–17397 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Cai, W. et al. Unveiling the Brønsted acid mechanism for Meerwein–Ponndorf–Verley reduction in methanol conversion over ZSM-5. Nat. Commun. 15, 8736 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  6. He, L. et al. Catalytic conversion of ethanol to oxygen-containing value-added chemicals. ACS Catal. 13, 11291–11304 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Pfriem, N. et al. Role of the ionic environment in enhancing the activity of reacting molecules in zeolite pores. Science 372, 952–957 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Qi, L. et al. Ethanol conversion to butadiene over isolated zinc and yttrium sites grafted onto dealuminated beta zeolite. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 142, 14674–14687 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Chowdhury, A. D. et al. Unraveling the homologation reaction sequence of the zeolite-catalyzed ethanol-to-hydrocarbons process. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 58, 3908–3912 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Sun, J. & Wang, Y. Recent advances in catalytic conversion of ethanol to chemicals. ACS Catal. 4, 1078–1090 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Le Van Mao, R., Nguyen, T. M. & McLaughlin, G. P. The bioethanol-to-ethylene (B.E.T.E.) process. Appl. Catal. 48, 265–277 (1989).

    Google Scholar 

  12. Xin, H. et al. Catalytic dehydration of ethanol over post-treated ZSM-5 zeolites. J. Catal. 312, 204–215 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  13. Zhang, Q., Yu, J. & Corma, A. Applications of zeolites to C1 chemistry: recent advances, challenges, and opportunities. Adv. Mater. 32, 2002927 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  14. Bryant, D. E. & Kranich, W. L. Dehydration of alcohols over zeolite catalysts. J. Catal. 8, 8–13 (1967).

    Google Scholar 

  15. Van Speybroeck, V. et al. Advances in theory and their application within the field of zeolite chemistry. Chem. Soc. Rev. 44, 7044–7111 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  16. Olsbye, U. et al. Conversion of methanol to hydrocarbons: how zeolite cavity and pore size controls product selectivity. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 51, 5810–5831 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  17. Yarulina, I. et al. Structure-performance descriptors and the role of Lewis acidity in the methanol-to-propylene process. Nat. Chem. 10, 804–812 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  18. Arora, S. S., Ieskens, D. L. S. N., Malek, A. & Bhan, A. Lifetime improvement in methanol-to-olefins catalysis over chabazite materials by high-pressure H2 co-feeds. Nat. Catal. 1, 666–672 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  19. Zeng, S. et al. Revealing the roles of hydrocarbon pool mechanism in ethanol-to-hydrocarbons reaction. J. Catal. 413, 517–526 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  20. Zhao, S. et al. Synergy of extraframework Al3+ cations and brønsted acid sites on hierarchical ZSM-5 zeolites for butanol-to-olefin conversion. J. Phys. Chem. C 125, 11665–11676 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  21. Xu, J., Wang, Q. & Deng, F. Metal active sites and their catalytic functions in zeolites: insights from solid-state NMR spectroscopy. Acc. Chem. Res. 52, 2179–2189 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  22. Ravi, M., Sushkevich, V. L. & van Bokhoven, J. A. Towards a better understanding of Lewis acidic aluminium in zeolites. Nat. Mater. 19, 1047–1056 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  23. Yakimov, A. V. et al. Structure and framework association of Lewis acid sites in MOR zeolite. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 144, 10377–10385 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  24. Ravi, M., Sushkevich, V. L. & van Bokhoven, J. A. Lewis acidity inherent to the framework of zeolite mordenite. J. Phys. Chem. C 123, 15139–15144 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  25. Li, S. H. et al. Bronsted/Lewis acid synergy in dealuminated HY zeolite: A combined solid-state NMR and theoretical calculation study. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 129, 11161–11171 (2007).

    Google Scholar 

  26. Yu, Z. et al. Brønsted/Lewis acid synergy in H–ZSM-5 and H–MOR zeolites studied by 1H and 27Al DQ-MAS solid-state NMR spectroscopy. J. Phys. Chem. C 115, 22320–22327 (2011).

    Google Scholar 

  27. Mezari, B., Magusin, P. C. M. M., Almutairi, S. M. T., Pidko, E. A. & Hensen, E. J. M. Nature of enhanced brønsted acidity induced by extraframework aluminum in an ultrastabilized faujasite zeolite: an in situ NMR study. J. Phys. Chem. C 125, 9050–9059 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  28. Schroeder, C., Hansen, M. R. & Koller, H. Ultrastabilization of zeolite Y transforms bronsted-bronsted acid pairs into bronsted-lewis acid pairs. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 57, 14281–14285 (2018).

  29. Perea, D. E. et al. Determining the location and nearest neighbours of aluminium in zeolites with atom probe tomography. Nat. Commun. 6, 7589 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  30. Kondo, J. N., Ito, K., Yoda, E., Wakabayashi, F. & Domen, K. An ethoxy intermediate in ethanol dehydration on brønsted acid sites in zeolite. J. Phys. Chem. B 109, 10969–10972 (2005).

    Google Scholar 

  31. Kondo, J. N. et al. Activation energies for the reaction of ethoxy species to ethene over zeolites. J. Phys. Chem. C 114, 20107–20113 (2010).

    Google Scholar 

  32. Zhou, X. et al. Observation of an oxonium ion intermediate in ethanol dehydration to ethene on zeolite. Nat. Commun. 10, 1961 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  33. Van der Borght, K. et al. Insights into the reaction mechanism of ethanol conversion into hydrocarbons on H-ZSM-5. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 55, 12817–12821 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  34. Wang, Z. et al. Insight into three-coordinate aluminum species on ethanol-to-olefin conversion over ZSM-5 zeolites. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 58, 18061–18068 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  35. Kiricsi, I. et al. Progress toward understanding Zeolite.beta. acidity: An IR and 27Al NMR spectroscopic study. J. Phys. Chem. 98, 4627–4634 (1994).

    Google Scholar 

  36. Vimont, A., Thibault-Starzyk, F. & Lavalley, J. C. Infrared spectroscopic study of the acidobasic properties of beta zeolite. J. Phys. Chem. B 104, 286–291 (2000).

    Google Scholar 

  37. Christiansen, M. A., Mpourmpakis, G. & Vlachos, D. G. Density functional theory-computed mechanisms of ethylene and diethyl ether formation from ethanol on γ-Al2O3(100). ACS Catal. 3, 1965–1975 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  38. Wang, C. et al. Extra-framework aluminum-assisted initial C-C bond formation in methanol-to-olefins conversion on zeolite H-ZSM-5. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 57, 10197–10201 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  39. Xin, S. et al. The acidic nature of “NMR-invisible” tri-coordinated framework aluminum species in zeolites. Chem. Sci. 10, 10159–10169 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  40. Hu, M. et al. Unravelling the reactivity of framework Lewis acid sites towards methanol activation on H-ZSM-5 zeolite with solid-state NMR spectroscopy. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 61, e202207400 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  41. Zeng, S. et al. Investigation of ethanol conversion on H-ZSM-5 zeolite by in situ solid-state NMR. Energy Fuels 35, 12319–12328 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  42. Wang, W., Jiao, J., Jiang, Y., Ray, S. S. & Hunger, M. Formation and decomposition of surface ethoxy species on acidic zeolite Y. ChemPhysChem 6, 1467–1469 (2005).

    Google Scholar 

  43. Pourpoint, F. et al. Measurement of aluminum–carbon distances using S-RESPDOR NMR experiments. ChemPhysChem 13, 3605–3615 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  44. Wang, C. et al. Direct detection of supramolecular reaction centers in the methanolto- olefins conversion over zeolite H-ZSM-5 by C-13-Al-27 solid-state NMR spectroscopy. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 55, 2507–2511 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  45. Haw, J. F. et al. In situ NMR investigations of heterogeneous catalysis with samples prepared under standard reaction conditions. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 37, 948–949 (1998).

    Google Scholar 

  46. Brinkmann, A. & Kentgens, A. P. M. Proton-selective 17O−H distance measurements in fast magic-angle-spinning solid-state NMR spectroscopy for the determination of hydrogen bond lengths. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 128, 14758–14759 (2006).

    Google Scholar 

  47. Bak, M., Rasmussen, J. T. & Nielsen, N. C. SIMPSON: A General simulation program for solid-state NMR spectroscopy. J. Magn. Reson. 147, 296–330 (2000).

    Google Scholar 

  48. Bak, M. & Nielsen, N. C. REPULSION, A novel approach to efficient powder averaging in solid-state NMR. J. Magn. Reson. 125, 132–139 (1997).

    Google Scholar 

  49. Jarrin, T., de Bruin, T. & Chizallet, C. Impact of point defects, external surfaces sites, and Si/Al ratio on Al–O bonds hydrolysis kinetics at the initiation of faujasite dealumination. ACS Catal. 14, 1639–1652 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  50. Balcom, H., Hoffman, A. J., Locht, H. & Hibbitts, D. Brønsted acid strength does not change for bulk and external sites of MFI except for Al substitution where silanol groups form. ACS Catal. 13, 4470–4487 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  51. Simperler, A. et al. Probing the acid strength of brønsted acidic zeolites with acetonitrile:  an atomistic and quantum chemical study. J. Phys. Chem. B 108, 7152–7161 (2004).

    Google Scholar 

  52. Chu, Y., Yi, X., Li, C., Sun, X. & Zheng, A. Brønsted/lewis acid sites synergistically promote the initial C–C bond formation in the MTO reaction. Chem. Sci. 9, 6470–6479 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  53. Ghorbanpour, A., Rimer, J. D. & Grabow, L. C. Periodic, vdW-corrected density functional theory investigation of the effect of Al siting in H-ZSM-5 on chemisorption properties and site-specific acidity. Catal. Commun. 52, 98–102 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  54. Chai, J.-D. & Head-Gordon, M. Long-range corrected hybrid density functionals with damped atom–atom dispersion corrections. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 10, 6615–6620 (2008).

    Google Scholar 

  55. Chu, Y., Lo, A.-Y., Wang, C. & Deng, F. Origin of high selectivity of dimethyl ether carbonylation in the 8-membered ring channel of mordenite zeolite. J. Phys. Chem. C 123, 15503–15512 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the National Key R&D Program of China (2023YFB4103600), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (22225205, 22422207, 22320102002, 22127801, U25A20551), the Strategic Priority Research Program of the Chinese Academy of Sciences (XDB0540000), the Youth Innovation Promotion Association of the Chinese Academy of Sciences (2021329), Hubei International Scientific and Technological Cooperation program (2024EHA043, SH2303), and the Young Top-notch Talent Cultivation Program of Hubei Province.

Author information

Author notes
  1. These authors contributed equally: Min Hu, Yueying Chu.

Authors and Affiliations

  1. National Center for Magnetic Resonance in Wuhan, State Key Laboratory of Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy and Imaging, Wuhan Institute of Physics and Mathematics, Innovation Academy for Precision Measurement Science and Technology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Wuhan, China

    Min Hu, Yueying Chu, Chao Wang, Wenjin Cai, Qiang Wang, Jun Xu & Feng Deng

  2. University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China

    Wenjin Cai

Authors
  1. Min Hu
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Yueying Chu
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Chao Wang
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Wenjin Cai
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Qiang Wang
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Jun Xu
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Feng Deng
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

M.H., W.J.C., and C.W. conducted the catalysts preparation, characterization, and catalytic testing; Y.Y.C. performed the DFT calculations; M.H. and Q.W. carried out the solid-state NMR experiments; M.H., Y.Y.C., C.W., J.X., and F.D wrote the manuscript; and C.W. and J.X. designed and directed the project. All authors discussed the results and commented on the manuscript.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Chao Wang or Jun Xu.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Peer review

Peer review information

Nature Communications thanks Kim Larmier, and the other anonymous reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work. A peer review file is available.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Information (download PDF )

Transparent Peer Review file (download PDF )

Source data

Source Data (download XLSX )

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if you modified the licensed material. You do not have permission under this licence to share adapted material derived from this article or parts of it. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Hu, M., Chu, Y., Wang, C. et al. Unveiling the thermodynamic-kinetic trade-off effect on acid sites in zeolite-catalyzed alcohol dehydration. Nat Commun (2026). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-026-70418-y

Download citation

  • Received: 24 February 2025

  • Accepted: 26 February 2026

  • Published: 09 March 2026

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-026-70418-y

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

Download PDF

Advertisement

Explore content

  • Research articles
  • Reviews & Analysis
  • News & Comment
  • Videos
  • Collections
  • Subjects
  • Follow us on Facebook
  • Follow us on X
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed

About the journal

  • Aims & Scope
  • Editors
  • Journal Information
  • Open Access Fees and Funding
  • Calls for Papers
  • Editorial Values Statement
  • Journal Metrics
  • Editors' Highlights
  • Contact
  • Editorial policies
  • Top Articles

Publish with us

  • For authors
  • For Reviewers
  • Language editing services
  • Open access funding
  • Submit manuscript

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

  • Explore articles by subject
  • Find a job
  • Guide to authors
  • Editorial policies

Nature Communications (Nat Commun)

ISSN 2041-1723 (online)

nature.com footer links

About Nature Portfolio

  • About us
  • Press releases
  • Press office
  • Contact us

Discover content

  • Journals A-Z
  • Articles by subject
  • protocols.io
  • Nature Index

Publishing policies

  • Nature portfolio policies
  • Open access

Author & Researcher services

  • Reprints & permissions
  • Research data
  • Language editing
  • Scientific editing
  • Nature Masterclasses
  • Research Solutions

Libraries & institutions

  • Librarian service & tools
  • Librarian portal
  • Open research
  • Recommend to library

Advertising & partnerships

  • Advertising
  • Partnerships & Services
  • Media kits
  • Branded content

Professional development

  • Nature Awards
  • Nature Careers
  • Nature Conferences

Regional websites

  • Nature Africa
  • Nature China
  • Nature India
  • Nature Japan
  • Nature Middle East
  • Privacy Policy
  • Use of cookies
  • Legal notice
  • Accessibility statement
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Your US state privacy rights
Springer Nature

© 2026 Springer Nature Limited

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing