Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Advertisement

Nature Communications
  • View all journals
  • Search
  • My Account Login
  • Content Explore content
  • About the journal
  • Publish with us
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed
  1. nature
  2. nature communications
  3. articles
  4. article
Graphene-inspired porous polymer network for ethane/ethylene separation and methane purification
Download PDF
Download PDF
  • Article
  • Open access
  • Published: 27 March 2026

Graphene-inspired porous polymer network for ethane/ethylene separation and methane purification

  • Kelechi Festus1,2,
  • Fuan Guo3,
  • Saif Ullah  ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0001-8836-98624,
  • Sayan Maiti5,
  • Ankit Mondal1,
  • Vladimir Bakhmutov1,
  • Urme Podder1,
  • Aishi Sikdar1,
  • Roknuzzaman Roknuzzaman  ORCID: orcid.org/0009-0005-2887-42065,
  • Hengyu Lin  ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0002-0332-34091,
  • Lei Fang1,
  • Shengqian Ma  ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0002-1897-70695,
  • Timo Thonhauser  ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0003-4771-75114,
  • Hao Wang3,
  • Qingsheng Wang  ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0002-6411-984X2 &
  • …
  • Hong-Cai Zhou  ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0002-9029-37881 

Nature Communications , Article number:  (2026) Cite this article

  • 3082 Accesses

  • 2 Altmetric

  • Metrics details

We are providing an unedited version of this manuscript to give early access to its findings. Before final publication, the manuscript will undergo further editing. Please note there may be errors present which affect the content, and all legal disclaimers apply.

Subjects

  • Energy
  • Graphene
  • Pollution remediation
  • Polymer chemistry
  • Porous materials

Abstract

C2H4 and CH4 are essential for industrial applications. However, contamination with other natural gases is a challenge to their utilization. Although several sorbents have been investigated, their performance remains limited. This study introduces graphene-inspired, PPN-20, a porous polymer network (PPN) capable of separating C2H6/C2H4 and purifying CH4 from a C3H8/C2H6/CH4 mixture in a single step. The ultra-microporosity of PPN-20 enables preferential C-H···π interactions with C2H6 and C3H8. As a result, PPN-20 exhibits a C2H6 and C3H8 uptake of 3.93 mmol/g and 5.98 mmol/g, respectively, at 298 K and 1 bar, representing the highest reported for any PPN. It achieves ideal adsorbed solution theory (IAST) selectivities of 2.2 for C2H6/C2H4, 368.2 for C2H6/CH4, 40.14 for C3H8/C2H6, and 294,336 for C3H8/CH4. This selectivity, to the best of our knowledge, is the highest reported for any PPN in the case of C2H6/C2H4 separation and for any sorbent in the cases of C2H6/CH4, C3H8/C2H6, and C3H8/CH4 separation. Robustness tests, including breakthrough experiments, IAST calculations, etc., demonstrate the reliability of PPN-20. Its exceptional performance is attributed to precisely engineered pore sizes that enhance the trapping of guest molecules. These results will pave the way for the design of PPNs for short-chain hydrocarbon purification.

Similar content being viewed by others

Fully inverse adsorption enables one-step high-purity C2H2 separation from ternary C2 mixtures in a robust porous crystal

Article Open access 18 November 2025

Efficient ethylene purification by a robust ethane-trapping porous organic cage

Article Open access 17 June 2021

Pore configuration control in hybrid azolate ultra-microporous frameworks for sieving propylene from propane

Article 15 November 2024

Data availability

All experimental and computational data supporting the findings of this study are included in the published article, supplementary information, and source data. Upon request, they can also be obtained from the corresponding authors. Source data are provided with this paper.

References

  1. Peter, S. C. Reduction of CO2 to chemicals and fuels: a solution to global warming and energy crisis. ACS Energy Lett. 3, 1557–1561 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Simmer, R. A., Jansen, E. J., Patterson, K. J. & Schnoor, J. L. Climate change and the sea: a major disruption in steady state and the master variables. ACS Environ. Au 3, 195–208 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Xu, W. et al. Globally elevated greenhouse gas emissions from polluted urban rivers. Nat. Sustain. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41893-024-01358-y (2024).

  4. Chang, M. et al. Enhancing CH4 capture from coalbed methane through tuning van der waals affinity within isoreticular al-based metal–organic frameworks. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 14, 25374–25384 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Goller, A., Obenauf, J., Kretschmer, W. P. & Kempe, R. The Highly Controlled and Efficient Polymerization of Ethylene. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 62, e202216464 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Zhang, Y., Kang, X. & Jian, Z. Selective branch formation in ethylene polymerization to access precise ethylene-propylene copolymers. Nat. Commun. 13, 725 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Chen, Z., Leatherman, M. D., Daugulis, O. & Brookhart, M. Nickel-catalyzed copolymerization of ethylene and vinyltrialkoxysilanes: catalytic production of cross-linkable polyethylene and elucidation of the chain-growth mechanism. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 139, 16013–16022 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Wang, S.-M. et al. Ethane/ethylene separations in flexible diamondoid coordination networks via an ethane-induced gate-opening mechanism. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 146, 4153–4161 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Zhang, X. et al. Selective ethane/ethylene separation in a robust microporous hydrogen-bonded organic framework. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 142, 633–640 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Niu, Z. et al. A metal–organic framework based methane nano-trap for the capture of coal-mine methane. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 58, 10138–10141 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Hamedi, H., Karimi, I. A. & Gundersen, T. Optimal cryogenic processes for nitrogen rejection from natural gas. Comput. Chem. Eng. 112, 101–111 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  12. Rufford, T. E. et al. The removal of CO2 and N2 from natural gas: A review of conventional and emerging process technologies. J. Pet. Sci. Eng. 94-95, 123–154 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  13. Sholl, D. S. & Lively, R. P. Seven chemical separations to change the world. Nature 532, 435–437 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  14. Ren, T., Patel, M. & Blok, K. Olefins from conventional and heavy feedstocks: Energy use in steam cracking and alternative processes. Energy 31, 425–451 (2006).

    Google Scholar 

  15. Ghorbanian, K. & AminiMagham, M. Swirl intensity as a control mechanism for methane purification in supersonic gas separators. J. Nat. Gas. Sci. Eng. 83, 103572 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  16. Mohamed, M. H. et al. Designing open metal sites in metal–organic frameworks for paraffin/olefin separations. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 141, 13003–13007 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  17. Amghizar, I., Vandewalle, L. A., Van Geem, K. M. & Marin, G. B. New Trends in Olefin Production. Engineering 3, 171–178 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  18. Corma, A. et al. Crude oil to chemicals: light olefins from crude oil. Catal. Sci. Technol. 7, 12–46 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  19. Liao, P.-Q., Zhang, W.-X., Zhang, J.-P. & Chen, X.-M. Efficient purification of ethene by an ethane-trapping metal-organic framework. Nat. Commun. 6, 8697 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  20. Pillai, R. S., Pinto, M. L., Pires, J., Jorge, M. & Gomes, J. R. B. Understanding Gas Adsorption Selectivity in IRMOF-8 Using Molecular Simulation. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 7, 624–637 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  21. Lv, D. et al. Selective Adsorption of Ethane over Ethylene in PCN-245: Impacts of Interpenetrated Adsorbent. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 10, 8366–8373 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  22. Böhme, U. et al. Ethene/Ethane and Propene/Propane separation via the olefin and paraffin selective metal–organic framework adsorbents CPO-27 and ZIF-8. Langmuir 29, 8592–8600 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  23. Liu, W. et al. Highly robust microporous metal-organic frameworks for efficient ethylene purification under dry and humid conditions. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 62, e202217662 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  24. Gücüyener, C., van den Bergh, J., Gascon, J. & Kapteijn, F. Ethane/Ethene Separation Turned on Its Head: Selective Ethane Adsorption on the Metal−Organic Framework ZIF-7 through a Gate-Opening Mechanism. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 132, 17704–17706 (2010).

    Google Scholar 

  25. Li, J.-R., Kuppler, R. J. & Zhou, H.-C. Selective gas adsorption and separation in metal–organic frameworks. Chem. Soc. Rev. 38, 1477–1504 (2009).

    Google Scholar 

  26. Lin, R.-B. et al. Boosting Ethane/Ethylene Separation within Isoreticular Ultramicroporous Metal–Organic Frameworks. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 140, 12940–12946 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  27. Yang, Y. et al. Ethylene/ethane separation in a stable hydrogen-bonded organic framework through a gating mechanism. Nat. Chem. 13, 933–939 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  28. Su, K., Wang, W., Du, S., Ji, C. & Yuan, D. Efficient ethylene purification by a robust ethane-trapping porous organic cage. Nat. Commun. 12, 3703 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  29. Patel, H. A. et al. Unprecedented high-temperature CO2 selectivity in N2-phobic nanoporous covalent organic polymers. Nat. Commun. 4, 1357 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  30. Kuecken, S. et al. Fast tuning of covalent triazine frameworks for photocatalytic hydrogen evolution. Chem. Commun. 53, 5854–5857 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  31. Zou, L. et al. Porous organic polymers for post-combustion carbon capture. Adv. Mater. 29, 1700229 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  32. Day, G. S. et al. Improving Alkylamine Incorporation in Porous Polymer Networks through Dopant Incorporation. Adv. Sustain. Syst. 3, 1900051 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  33. Lu, W. et al. Sulfonate-Grafted Porous Polymer Networks for Preferential CO2 Adsorption at Low Pressure. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 133, 18126–18129 (2011).

    Google Scholar 

  34. Tang, Y. et al. Porous organic polymers for drug delivery: Hierarchical pore structures, variable morphologies, and biological properties. Biomater. Sci. 10, 5369–5390 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  35. Chang, M., Ren, J., Yang, Q. & Liu, D. A robust calcium-based microporous metal-organic framework for efficient CH4/N2 separation. Chem. Eng. J. 408, 127294 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  36. Chang, M. et al. Separation of CH4/N2 by an ultra-stable metal–organic framework with the highest breakthrough selectivity. AIChE J. 68, e17794 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  37. Vikrant, K., Kumar, V., Kim, K.-H. & Kukkar, D. Metal–organic frameworks (MOFs): potential and challenges for capture and abatement of ammonia. J. Mater. Chem. A 5, 22877–22896 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  38. Guo, Z.-H. et al. Cost-effective synthesis and solution processing of porous polymer networks through methanesulfonic acid-mediated aldol triple condensation. Mater. Chem. Front. 2, 396–401 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  39. Wang, C., Yan, J., Ma, Z. & Wang, Z. Highly efficient separation of ethylene/ethane in microenvironment-modulated microporous polymers. Sep. Purif. Technol. 287, 120580 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  40. Pak, S., Ahn, J. & Kim, H. Synthesis of Saccharide-based Hydrochar with Macroporous Structure for Effective Organic Pollutant Removal. Fibers Polym. 23, 1789–1796 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  41. Besselink, R., Stawski, T. M., Van Driessche, A. E. S. & Benning, L. G. Not just fractal surfaces, but surface fractal aggregates: Derivation of the expression for the structure factor and its applications. J. Chem. Phys. 145, https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4960953 (2016).

  42. Liu, Y., Paskevicius, M., Sofianos, M. V., Parkinson, G. & Li, C.-Z. In situ SAXS studies of the pore development in biochar during gasification. Carbon 172, 454–462 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  43. Myers, A. L. & Prausnitz, J. M. Thermodynamics of mixed-gas adsorption. AIChE J. 11, 121–127 (1965).

    Google Scholar 

  44. Krishna, R. Screening metal–organic frameworks for mixture separations in fixed-bed adsorbers using a combined selectivity/capacity metric. RSC Adv. 7, 35724–35737 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  45. Krishna, R. Metrics for evaluation and screening of metal–organic frameworks for applications in mixture separations. ACS Omega 5, 16987–17004 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  46. Kresse, G. & Furthmüller, J. Efficient iterative schemes for ab initio total-energy calculations using a plane-wave basis set. Phys. Rev. B 54, 11169–11186 (1996).

    Google Scholar 

  47. Kresse, G. & Joubert, D. From ultrasoft pseudopotentials to the projector augmented-wave method. Phys. Rev. B 59, 1758–1775 (1999).

    Google Scholar 

  48. Thonhauser, T. et al. Spin signature of nonlocal correlation binding in metal-organic frameworks. Phys. Rev. Lett. 115, 136402 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the Robert A. Welch Foundation through an Endowed Chair to H.-C.Zhou (grant no. A-0030). H.W. acknowledges the funding from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (grant no. 22478251). Use of the Texas A&M University Soft Matter Facility (RRID: SCR_022482) and contributions of Dr. Peiran Wei and Dr. Jung Ahn are acknowledged. The authors acknowledge the characterization part of this work performed in the Texas A&M University Materials Characterization Core Facility (RRID: SCR_022202).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Chemistry, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, USA

    Kelechi Festus, Ankit Mondal, Vladimir Bakhmutov, Urme Podder, Aishi Sikdar, Hengyu Lin, Lei Fang & Hong-Cai Zhou

  2. Artie McFerrin Department of Chemical Engineering, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, USA

    Kelechi Festus & Qingsheng Wang

  3. Hoffmann Institute of Advanced Materials, Shenzhen Polytechnic University, Shenzhen, China

    Fuan Guo & Hao Wang

  4. Department of Physics and Center for Functional Materials, Wake Forest University, Winston-Salem, NC, USA

    Saif Ullah & Timo Thonhauser

  5. Department of Chemistry, University of North Texas, Denton, TX, USA

    Sayan Maiti, Roknuzzaman Roknuzzaman & Shengqian Ma

Authors
  1. Kelechi Festus
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Fuan Guo
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Saif Ullah
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Sayan Maiti
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Ankit Mondal
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Vladimir Bakhmutov
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Urme Podder
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Aishi Sikdar
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Roknuzzaman Roknuzzaman
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  10. Hengyu Lin
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  11. Lei Fang
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  12. Shengqian Ma
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  13. Timo Thonhauser
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  14. Hao Wang
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  15. Qingsheng Wang
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  16. Hong-Cai Zhou
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

The project was conceived and supervised by K.F., Q.W. and H.-C.Z. K.F. performed the main experiments and characterization of the sorbent. K.F., F.G. and H.W. conducted and analyzed the breakthrough measurement. K.F., H.L. and V.B. did the ss-NMR studies. S.U. and T.T. did the computational studies, and K.F., S.U. and T.T. discussed the results. K.F., S.M. (Sayan Maiti), R.R., L.F. and S.M. (Shengqian Ma) collected and analyzed the gas adsorption data. K.F., S.U., A.M., A.S., U.P., T.T., Q.W. and H.-C.Z. wrote the manuscript.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Qingsheng Wang or Hong-Cai Zhou.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Peer review

Peer review information

Nature Communications thanks Qibin Xia and the other anonymous reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work. A peer review file is available.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Information (download PDF )

Transparent Peer Review file (download PDF )

Source data

Source Data (download ZIP )

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if you modified the licensed material. You do not have permission under this licence to share adapted material derived from this article or parts of it. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Festus, K., Guo, F., Ullah, S. et al. Graphene-inspired porous polymer network for ethane/ethylene separation and methane purification. Nat Commun (2026). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-026-70471-7

Download citation

  • Received: 29 August 2025

  • Accepted: 24 February 2026

  • Published: 27 March 2026

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-026-70471-7

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

Download PDF

Advertisement

Explore content

  • Research articles
  • Reviews & Analysis
  • News & Comment
  • Videos
  • Collections
  • Subjects
  • Follow us on Facebook
  • Follow us on X
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed

About the journal

  • Aims & Scope
  • Editors
  • Journal Information
  • Open Access Fees and Funding
  • Calls for Papers
  • Editorial Values Statement
  • Journal Metrics
  • Editors' Highlights
  • Contact
  • Editorial policies
  • Top Articles

Publish with us

  • For authors
  • For Reviewers
  • Language editing services
  • Open access funding
  • Submit manuscript

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

  • Explore articles by subject
  • Find a job
  • Guide to authors
  • Editorial policies

Nature Communications (Nat Commun)

ISSN 2041-1723 (online)

nature.com footer links

About Nature Portfolio

  • About us
  • Press releases
  • Press office
  • Contact us

Discover content

  • Journals A-Z
  • Articles by subject
  • protocols.io
  • Nature Index

Publishing policies

  • Nature portfolio policies
  • Open access

Author & Researcher services

  • Reprints & permissions
  • Research data
  • Language editing
  • Scientific editing
  • Nature Masterclasses
  • Research Solutions

Libraries & institutions

  • Librarian service & tools
  • Librarian portal
  • Open research
  • Recommend to library

Advertising & partnerships

  • Advertising
  • Partnerships & Services
  • Media kits
  • Branded content

Professional development

  • Nature Awards
  • Nature Careers
  • Nature Conferences

Regional websites

  • Nature Africa
  • Nature China
  • Nature India
  • Nature Japan
  • Nature Middle East
  • Privacy Policy
  • Use of cookies
  • Legal notice
  • Accessibility statement
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Your US state privacy rights
Springer Nature

© 2026 Springer Nature Limited

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing