Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Advertisement

Nature Communications
  • View all journals
  • Search
  • My Account Login
  • Content Explore content
  • About the journal
  • Publish with us
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed
  1. nature
  2. nature communications
  3. articles
  4. article
In situ synchrotron X-ray scattering reveals organic-mediated scaling mechanisms on desalination membranes
Download PDF
Download PDF
  • Article
  • Open access
  • Published: 10 March 2026

In situ synchrotron X-ray scattering reveals organic-mediated scaling mechanisms on desalination membranes

  • Zimou Feng1 na1,
  • Shu Xu  ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0002-0184-91591,2 na1,
  • Jingjing Cao  ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0003-2945-64421,3,
  • Zhen Ren1,
  • Yi Yang  ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0001-9600-37131,
  • Jin Jiang  ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0003-2355-42444,
  • Xunda Feng  ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0002-4528-07695 &
  • …
  • Xinglin Lu  ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0002-0229-77121,6 

Nature Communications , Article number:  (2026) Cite this article

  • 3296 Accesses

  • Metrics details

We are providing an unedited version of this manuscript to give early access to its findings. Before final publication, the manuscript will undergo further editing. Please note there may be errors present which affect the content, and all legal disclaimers apply.

Subjects

  • Engineering
  • Pollution remediation

Abstract

Inorganic scaling, governed by complex organic–inorganic interactions, presents a pervasive challenge in aqueous environments with broad implications for engineering systems. Using reverse-osmosis (RO) desalination as a model platform, we investigate how mixed organic foulants influence inorganic gypsum scaling at membrane–water interfaces. Representative proteins, humic substances, and polysaccharides are employed as model foulants to reveal their roles in modulating gypsum crystallization behavior. By integrating advanced in situ, time-resolved synchrotron X-ray scattering within the concentration polarization layer—a region typically inaccessible to conventional characterization techniques—with modelling, spectroscopic, and imaging analyses, we track the evolution of gypsum scaling from nanoscale precursors to mature crystals. Our findings reveal that different classes of organic foulants regulate gypsum crystallization through distinct mechanisms, ranging from inhibiting precursor aggregation in the bulk solution to altering interfacial physicochemical properties that govern the kinetics of heterogeneous nucleation and growth. These findings provide molecular-level insights into the coupled dynamics of organic fouling and inorganic scaling, advancing mechanistic understanding of crystallization at functional interfaces. Such insights offer guidance for the rational design of anti-scaling strategies in engineering systems.

Similar content being viewed by others

Additive-specific modulation of non-classical nucleation pathways

Article Open access 22 January 2026

Methylation of reverse osmosis membrane for superior anti-fouling performance via blocking carboxyl groups in polyamide

Article 03 January 2025

Temporal insights into electromagnetic field-tuned scaling pathways of CaCO3 and CaSO4•2H2O during reverse osmosis desalination of real brackish water

Article Open access 09 March 2026

Data availability

The data supporting the findings of the study are included in the main text and supplementary information files.  Source data are provided with this paper.

References

  1. Nancollas, G. & Reddy, M. The kinetics of crystallization of scale-forming minerals. Soc. Pet. Eng. J. 14, 117–126 (1974).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Bottrell, S. H. & Newton, R. J. Reconstruction of changes in global sulfur cycling from marine sulfate isotopes. Earth-Sci. Rev. 75, 59–83 (2006).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Fouke, B. W. et al. Depositional facies and aqueous-solid geochemistry of travertine-depositing hot springs (Angel Terrace, Mammoth Hot Springs, Yellowstone National Park, USA). J. Sediment. Res. 70, 565–585 (2000).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Elimelech, M. & Phillip, W. A. The future of seawater desalination: energy, technology, and the environment. science 333, 712–717 (2011).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Ahmed, M. A., Amin, S. & Mohamed, A. A. Fouling in reverse osmosis membranes: monitoring, characterization, mitigation strategies and future directions. Heliyon 9, e14908 (2023).

  6. McCutcheon, J. R. & Mauter, M. S. Fixing the desalination membrane pipeline. Science 380, 242–244 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Løge, I. A., Anabaraonye, B. U. & Fosbøl, P. L. Growth mechanisms of composite fouling: The impact of substrates on detachment processes. Chem. Eng. J. 446, 137008 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Cai, Y.-H., Burkhardt, C. J. & Schäfer, A. I. Renewable energy powered membrane technology: Impact of osmotic backwash on organic fouling during solar irradiance fluctuation. J. Membr. Sci. 647, 120286 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Ennaceri, H., Fischer, K., Schulze, A. & Moheimani, N. R. Membrane fouling control for sustainable microalgal biodiesel production: A review. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 161, 112335 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Cruz, C., Cisternas, L. A. & Kraslawski, A. Scaling problems and control technologies in industrial operations: Technology Assessment. Sep. Purif. Technol. 207, 20–27 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Meng, J. & Wang, S. Advanced antiscaling interfacial materials toward highly efficient heat energy transfer. Adv. Funct. Mater. 30, 1904796 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  12. Jafari, M. et al. Cost of fouling in full-scale reverse osmosis and nanofiltration installations in the Netherlands. Desalination 500, 114865 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  13. Van de Lisdonk, C., Van Paassen, J. & Schippers, J. Monitoring scaling in nanofiltration and reverse osmosis membrane systems. Desalination 132, 101–108 (2000).

    Google Scholar 

  14. Yin, Y. et al. The use of anti-scalants in gypsum scaling mitigation: Comparison with membrane surface modification and efficiency in combined reverse osmosis and membrane distillation. J. Membr. Sci. 643, 120077 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  15. Hsieh, I.-M. & Malmali, M. Scaling behavior in membrane distillation: Effect of Biopolymers and Antiscalants. Water Res. 255, 121456 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  16. Li, W. et al. Application of high-dose UV irradiation as nanofiltration pretreatment for drinking water production: Organic fouling mitigation and micropollutant removal. Water Res. 266, 122348 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  17. Khan, I. A., Lee, Y. S. & Kim, J.-O. Chemically enhanced pretreatment (CEPT) to reduce irreversible fouling during the clean-in-place process for membranes operating under constant flux and constant pressure filtration. Desalination 549, 116313 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  18. Hoang, T. A. in Water-formed deposits 13-47 (Elsevier, 2022).

  19. Gibbs, J. W. On the equilibrium of heterogeneous substances. Am. J. Sci. 3, 441–458 (1878).

    Google Scholar 

  20. Lee, J., Yang, J., Kwon, S. G. & Hyeon, T. Nonclassical nucleation and growth of inorganic nanoparticles. Nat. Rev. Mater. 1, 1–16 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  21. Van Driessche, A. E., Kellermeier, M., Benning, L. G. & Gebauer, D. in New Perspectives on Mineral Nucleation and Growth (Springer, 2017).

  22. Gebauer, D. & Cölfen, H. Prenucleation clusters and non-classical nucleation. Nano Today 6, 564–584 (2011).

    Google Scholar 

  23. Anklam, M. R. & Firoozabadi, A. An interfacial energy mechanism for the complete inhibition of crystal growth by inhibitor adsorption. J. Chem. Phys. 123, 144708 (2005).

  24. Lin, D. et al. Nanofiltration scaling influenced by coexisting pollutants considering the interaction between ferric coagulant and natural organic macromolecules. Chem. Eng. J. 413, 127403 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  25. Jermann, D., Pronk, W. & Boller, M. Mutual influences between natural organic matter and inorganic particles and their combined effect on ultrafiltration membrane fouling. Environ. Sci. Technol. 42, 9129–9136 (2008).

    Google Scholar 

  26. Ji, J., Qiu, J., Wai, N., Wong, F.-S. & Li, Y. Influence of organic and inorganic flocculants on physical–chemical properties of biomass and membrane-fouling rate. Water Res. 44, 1627–1635 (2010).

    Google Scholar 

  27. Quay, A. N. et al. Combined organic fouling and inorganic scaling in reverse osmosis: role of protein–silica interactions. Environ. Sci. Technol. 52, 9145–9153 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  28. Zhang, Y. et al. Inhibition of crystal nucleation and growth: a review. Cryst. Growth Des. 24, 2645–2665 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  29. Jin, B., Liu, Z. & Tang, R. Recent experimental explorations of non-classical nucleation. CrystEngComm 22, 4057–4073 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  30. Zang, S. et al. Direct observation and control of non-classical crystallization pathways in binary colloidal systems. Nat. Commun. 16, 3645 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  31. Fenter, P. A., Rivers, M. L., Sturchio, N. & Sutton, S. R. Applications of synchrotron radiation in low-temperature geochemistry and environmental science. Vol. 49 (Walter de Gruyter GmbH & Co KG, 2018).

  32. Liu, Y. et al. Progress and challenges in structural, in situ and operando characterization of single-atom catalysts by X-ray based synchrotron radiation techniques. Chem. Soc. Rev. 53, 11850–11887 (2024).

  33. Deng, N. et al. Selenite and selenate sequestration during coprecipitation with barite: insights from mineralization processes of adsorption, nucleation, and growth. Environ. Sci. Technol. 56, 15518–15527 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  34. Stawski, T. M. et al. Formation of calcium sulfate through the aggregation of sub-3 nanometre primary species. Nat. Commun. 7, 11177 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  35. Pauw, B. R. Everything SAXS: small-angle scattering pattern collection and correction. J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 25, 383201 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  36. Li, Y.-W. et al. BL19U2: Small-angle X-ray scattering beamline for biological macromolecules in solution at SSRF. Nucl. Sci. Tech. 31, 117 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  37. Bishnoi, A., Kumar, S. & Joshi, N. in Microscopy methods in nanomaterials characterization 313-337 (Elsevier, 2017).

  38. Toso, S., Baranov, D., Giannini, C., Marras, S. & Manna, L. Wide-angle x-ray diffraction evidence of structural coherence in CsPbBr3 nanocrystal superlattices. ACS Mater. Lett. 1, 272–276 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  39. Yang, Z. et al. Visualization and semiquantitative study of the distribution of major components in wheat straw in mesoscopic scale using fourier transform infrared microspectroscopic imaging. Anal. Chem. 90, 7332–7340 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  40. Luo, W., Arhatari, B., Gray, S. R. & Xie, M. Seeing is believing: Insights from synchrotron infrared mapping for membrane fouling in osmotic membrane bioreactors. Water Res. 137, 355–361 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  41. Xie, M., Luo, W. & Gray, S. R. Synchrotron Fourier transform infrared mapping: A novel approach for membrane fouling characterization. Water Res. 111, 375–381 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  42. Li, S. et al. Synchrotron FTIR mapping of mineralization in a microfluidic device. Lab a Chip 17, 1616–1624 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  43. He, S., Oddo, J. E. & Tomson, M. B. The inhibition of gypsum and barite nucleation in NaCl brines at temperatures from 25 to 90. C. Appl. Geochem. 9, 561–567 (1994).

    Google Scholar 

  44. Huang, X., Li, C., Zuo, K. & Li, Q. Predominant Effect of Material Surface Hydrophobicity on Gypsum Scale Formation. Environ. Sci. Technol. 54, 15395–15404 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  45. Dai, Z. et al. Gypsum scale formation and inhibition kinetics with implications in membrane system. Water Res 225, 119166 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  46. Liu, S. & Nancollas, G. A kinetic and morphological study of the seeded growth of calcium sulfate dihydrate in the presence of additives. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 52, 593–601 (1975).

    Google Scholar 

  47. Cao, T., Rolf, J., Wang, Z., Violet, C. & Elimelech, M. Distinct impacts of natural organic matter and colloidal particles on gypsum crystallization. Water Res. 218, 118500 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  48. Cody, A. & Cody, R. Evidence for micro-biological induction of {101} montmartre twinning of gypsum (CaSO4⋯ 2H2O). J. Cryst. Growth 98, 721–730 (1989).

    Google Scholar 

  49. Cody, A. & Cody, R. SEM and polarization analyzes updating early light microscope studies related to {101} twin formation in gypsum. J. Cryst. growth 98, 731–738 (1989).

    Google Scholar 

  50. He, S., Oddo, J. E. & Tomson, M. B. The nucleation kinetics of calcium sulfate dihydrate in NaCl solutions up to 6 m and 90 C. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 162, 297–303 (1994).

    Google Scholar 

  51. Choi, J. Y., Lee, T., Cheng, Y. & Cohen, Y. Observed crystallization induction time in seeded gypsum crystallization. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 58, 23359–23365 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  52. Van Driessche, A. et al. The role and implications of bassanite as a stable precursor phase to gypsum precipitation. Science 336, 69–72 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  53. Wang, Y.-W., Kim, Y.-Y., Christenson, H. K. & Meldrum, F. C. A new precipitation pathway for calcium sulfate dihydrate (gypsum) via amorphous and hemihydrate intermediates. Chem. Commun. 48, 504–506 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  54. Prosa, T. J., Bauer, B. J., Amis, E. J., Tomalia, D. A. & Scherrenberg, R. A SAXS study of the internal structure of dendritic polymer systems. J. Polym. Sci. Part B: Polym. Phys. 35, 2913–2924 (1997).

    Google Scholar 

  55. Konishi, T. et al. Origin of SAXS intensity in the low-q region during the early stage of polymer crystallization from both the melt and glassy state. Phys. Rev. Mater. 2, 105602 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  56. de Moor, P.-P. E., Beelen, T. P. & van Santen, R. A. SAXS/WAXS study on the formation of precursors and crystallization of silicalite. Microporous Mater. 9, 117–130 (1997).

    Google Scholar 

  57. Rabizadeh, T., Stawski, T. M., Morgan, D. J., Peacock, C. L. & Benning, L. G. The effects of inorganic additives on the nucleation and growth kinetics of calcium sulfate dihydrate crystals. Cryst. Growth Des. 17, 582–589 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  58. Saha, A. et al. New Insights into the transformation of calcium sulfate hemihydrate to gypsum using time-resolved cryogenic transmission electron microscopy. Langmuir 28, 11182–11187 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  59. Tong, T., Wallace, A. F., Zhao, S. & Wang, Z. Mineral scaling in membrane desalination: Mechanisms, mitigation strategies, and feasibility of scaling-resistant membranes. J. Membr. Sci. 579, 52–69 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  60. Horseman, T. et al. Wetting, scaling, and fouling in membrane distillation: state-of-the-art insights on fundamental mechanisms and mitigation strategies. ACS EST Eng. 1, 117–140 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  61. Yin, Y. et al. Which surface is more scaling resistant? A closer look at nucleation theories for heterogeneous gypsum nucleation in aqueous solutions. Environ. Sci. Technol. 56, 16315–16324 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  62. Van Santen, R. The Ostwald step rule. J. Phys. Chem. 88, 5768–5769 (1984).

    Google Scholar 

  63. Hu, C., Wang, X., Qi, Z. & Li, C. The new infrared beamline at NSRL. Infrared Phys. Technol. 105, 103200 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  64. Hua, W.-Q. et al. Time-resolved ultra-small-angle X-ray scattering beamline (BL10U1) at SSRF. Nucl. Sci. Tech. 35, 36 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  65. Zeng, J. et al. Performance on absolute scattering intensity calibration and protein molecular weight determination at BL16B1, a dedicated SAXS beamline at SSRF. J. Synchrotron Radiat. 24, 509–520 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  66. Basham, M. et al. Data analysis workbench (DAWN). J. Synchrotron Radiat. 22, 853–858 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  67. Hopkins, J. B., Gillilan, R. E. & Skou, S. BioXTAS RAW: improvements to a free open-source program for small-angle X-ray scattering data reduction and analysis. J. Appl. Crystallogr. 50, 1545–1553 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  68. Ashiotis, G. et al. The fast azimuthal integration Python library: pyFAI. J. Appl. Crystallogr. 48, 510–519 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We gratefully acknowledge the financial support from the National Science Foundation of China (52170094 and 22576197 to X.L.) and the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (to X.L.). We thank the National Facility for Protein Science in Shanghai of BL19U2 for providing technical support and assistance in SAXS/WAXS measurements. We also thank the Shanghai Synchrotron Radiation Facility of BL10U1 and BL16B1 for the assistance on USAXS/SAXS/WAXS measurements. We thank the National Synchrotron Radiation Laboratory of BL01B for the assistance on infrared mapping measurements. Some material characterization was carried out at the University of Science and Technology of China (USTC) Center for Micro- and Nanoscale Research and Fabrication, the Instruments Center for Physical Science at USTC, and the First Affiliated Hospital of USTC. We are grateful to Mr. Qingbo Xu at USTC for his assistance with the detector calibration for SAXS and WAXS measurements.

Author information

Author notes
  1. These authors contributed equally: Zimou Feng, Shu Xu.

Authors and Affiliations

  1. State Key Laboratory of Advanced Environmental Technology, Department of Environmental Science and Engineering, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei, China

    Zimou Feng, Shu Xu, Jingjing Cao, Zhen Ren, Yi Yang & Xinglin Lu

  2. SCNU Environmental Research Institute, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Chemical Pollution and Environmental Safety & MOE Key Laboratory of Theoretical Chemistry of Environment, School of Environment, South China Normal University, Guangzhou, China

    Shu Xu

  3. College of Textile Science and Engineering, Jiangnan University, Wuxi, China

    Jingjing Cao

  4. Guangdong Basic Research Center of Excellence for Ecological Security and Green Development, Key Laboratory for City Environmental Safety and Green Development of the Ministry of Education, School of Ecology, Environment and Resources, Guangdong University of Technology, Guangzhou, China

    Jin Jiang

  5. State Key Laboratory of Advanced Fiber Materials, Center for Advanced Low-dimension Materials, and College of Materials Sciences and Engineering, Donghua University, Shanghai, China

    Xunda Feng

  6. National Synchrotron Radiation Laboratory, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei, China

    Xinglin Lu

Authors
  1. Zimou Feng
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Shu Xu
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Jingjing Cao
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Zhen Ren
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Yi Yang
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Jin Jiang
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Xunda Feng
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Xinglin Lu
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

X.L. conceived the idea. Z.F. and X.L. designed experiments. Z.F., S.X., and Z.R. performed experiments. J.C. conducted crystallographic analysis. Z.F., S.X., J.C., Y.Y., J.J., X.F., and X.L. contributed to the data interpretation. Z.F., Z.R., and X.L. wrote the first draft. X.L., Z.F., S.X., and Y.Y. revised the manuscript. All the authors discussed the results.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Xinglin Lu.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Peer review

Peer review information

Nature Communications thanks Wenhai Luo, Yuelian Peng, Zhengyang Huo and the other, anonymous, reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work. A peer review file is available.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Information (download PDF )

Transparent Peer Review file (download PDF )

Source data

source data (download XLSX )

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if you modified the licensed material. You do not have permission under this licence to share adapted material derived from this article or parts of it. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Feng, Z., Xu, S., Cao, J. et al. In situ synchrotron X-ray scattering reveals organic-mediated scaling mechanisms on desalination membranes. Nat Commun (2026). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-026-70508-x

Download citation

  • Received: 31 May 2025

  • Accepted: 26 February 2026

  • Published: 10 March 2026

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-026-70508-x

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

Download PDF

Advertisement

Explore content

  • Research articles
  • Reviews & Analysis
  • News & Comment
  • Videos
  • Collections
  • Subjects
  • Follow us on Facebook
  • Follow us on X
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed

About the journal

  • Aims & Scope
  • Editors
  • Journal Information
  • Open Access Fees and Funding
  • Calls for Papers
  • Editorial Values Statement
  • Journal Metrics
  • Editors' Highlights
  • Contact
  • Editorial policies
  • Top Articles

Publish with us

  • For authors
  • For Reviewers
  • Language editing services
  • Open access funding
  • Submit manuscript

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

  • Explore articles by subject
  • Find a job
  • Guide to authors
  • Editorial policies

Nature Communications (Nat Commun)

ISSN 2041-1723 (online)

nature.com footer links

About Nature Portfolio

  • About us
  • Press releases
  • Press office
  • Contact us

Discover content

  • Journals A-Z
  • Articles by subject
  • protocols.io
  • Nature Index

Publishing policies

  • Nature portfolio policies
  • Open access

Author & Researcher services

  • Reprints & permissions
  • Research data
  • Language editing
  • Scientific editing
  • Nature Masterclasses
  • Research Solutions

Libraries & institutions

  • Librarian service & tools
  • Librarian portal
  • Open research
  • Recommend to library

Advertising & partnerships

  • Advertising
  • Partnerships & Services
  • Media kits
  • Branded content

Professional development

  • Nature Awards
  • Nature Careers
  • Nature Conferences

Regional websites

  • Nature Africa
  • Nature China
  • Nature India
  • Nature Japan
  • Nature Middle East
  • Privacy Policy
  • Use of cookies
  • Legal notice
  • Accessibility statement
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Your US state privacy rights
Springer Nature

© 2026 Springer Nature Limited

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing