Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Advertisement

Nature Communications
  • View all journals
  • Search
  • My Account Login
  • Content Explore content
  • About the journal
  • Publish with us
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed
  1. nature
  2. nature communications
  3. articles
  4. article
Reversible DNA condensation drives natural transformation
Download PDF
Download PDF
  • Article
  • Open access
  • Published: 19 March 2026

Reversible DNA condensation drives natural transformation

  • Joshua I. Santiago1,
  • Ishtiyaq Ahmed2,
  • Jeanette Hahn2,3,
  • Abigail Rubino1,
  • Heonhwa Choi1,
  • Guy Adami  ORCID: orcid.org/0009-0002-7476-74341,
  • David Dubnau  ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0001-9713-61202,3,
  • Matthew B. Neiditch  ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0002-7039-44692 &
  • …
  • Keith J. Mickolajczyk  ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0001-9445-03251 

Nature Communications , Article number:  (2026) Cite this article

  • 1972 Accesses

  • 7 Altmetric

  • Metrics details

We are providing an unedited version of this manuscript to give early access to its findings. Before final publication, the manuscript will undergo further editing. Please note there may be errors present which affect the content, and all legal disclaimers apply.

Subjects

  • Bacterial genetics
  • DNA
  • Molecular modelling
  • Single-molecule biophysics

Abstract

Natural transformation drives the spread of antibiotic resistance among bacteria. The DNA receptor ComEA is essential for transporting external transforming DNA into the periplasm by an unknown mechanism. Here, single-molecule optical tweezers and electron microscopy approaches show that Geobacillus stearothermophilus ComEA forms dynamic oligomers on DNA that can switch between two conformations depending on local concentration. When ComEA sparsely decorates DNA, it forms bridging oligomers that condense the DNA to generate sub-pN pulling forces. When ComEA more fully decorates DNA, it forms non-bridging oligomers that decondense DNA and cannot generate force. Mutating ComEA to favor either bridging or non-bridging conformations causes transformation deficiency in Bacillus subtilis, meaning condensation and decondensation each play mechanistic roles. Our results show that ComEA reversibly condenses DNA during natural transformation, first producing force to pull DNA into the periplasm and then abating force production to promote transport into the cytoplasm.

Similar content being viewed by others

Structure-function studies reveal ComEA contains an oligomerization domain essential for transformation in gram-positive bacteria

Article Open access 13 December 2022

Force generation by protein–DNA co-condensation

Article Open access 08 July 2021

A genetic circuit on a single DNA molecule as an autonomous dissipative nanodevice

Article Open access 29 January 2024

Data availability

All data supporting the findings in this paper are provided in the main manuscript and its Supplementary files. Source data are provided within the source data file. Source data are provided with this paper.

References

  1. Dubnau, D. & Blokesch, M. Mechanisms of DNA uptake by naturally competent bacteria. Annu. Rev. Genet. 53, 217–237 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Johnston, C., Martin, B., Fichant, G., Polard, P. & Claverys, J. Bacterial transformation: distribution, shared mechanisms and divergent control. Nat. Rev. Micro Biol. 12, 181–196 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Mell, J. C. & Redfield, R. J. Natural competence and the evolution of DNA uptake specificity. J. Bacteriol. 196, 1471–1483 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Winter, M., Buckling, A., Harms, K., Johnsen, P. J. & Vos, M. Antimicrobial resistance acquisition via natural transformation: context is everything. Curr. Opin. Microbiol. 64, 133–138 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Laxminarayan, R. et al. Antibiotic resistance—the need for global solutions. Lancet Infect. Dis. 13, 1057–1098 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Chen, I., Christie, P. J. & Dubnau, D. The ins and outs of DNA transfer in bacteria. Science 310, 1456–1460 (2005).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Damke, P. P. et al. ComFC mediates transport and handling of single-stranded DNA during natural transformation. Nat. Commun. 13, 1961 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Diallo, A. et al. Bacterial transformation: ComFA is a DNA-dependent ATPase that forms complexes with ComFC and DprA. Mol. Microbiol. 105, 741–754 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Provvedi, R. & Dubnau, D. ComEA is a DNA receptor for transformation of competent Bacillus subtilis. Mol. Microbiol. 31, 271–280 (1999).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Inamine, G. S. & Dubnau, D. ComEA, a Bacillus subtilis integral membrane protein required for genetic transformation, is needed for both DNA binding and transport. J. Bacteriol. 177, 3045–3051 (1995).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Gangel, H. et al. Concerted spatio-temporal dynamics of imported DNA and ComE DNA uptake protein during gonococcal transformation. PLoS Pathog. 10, e1004043 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  12. Seitz, P. et al. ComEA is essential for the transfer of external DNA into the periplasm in naturally transformable Vibrio cholerae cells. PLoS Genet. 10, e1004066 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  13. Seitz, P. & Blokesch, M. DNA transport across the outer and inner membranes of naturally transformable Vibrio cholerae is spatially but not temporally coupled. mBio 5, 01409–01414 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  14. Takeno, M., Taguchi, H. & Akamatsu, T. Role of ComEA in DNA uptake during transformation of competent Bacillus subtilis. J. Biosci. Bioeng. 113, 689–693 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  15. Hahn, J., DeSantis, M. & Dubnau, D. Mechanisms of transforming DNA uptake to the periplasm of Bacillus subtilis. mBio 12, 01061–21 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  16. Ahmed, I. et al. Structure-function studies reveal ComEA contains an oligomerization domain essential for transformation in gram-positive bacteria. Nat. Commun. 13, 7724 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  17. Odijk, T. Stiff chains and filaments under tension. Macromolecules 28, 7016–7018 (1995).

    Google Scholar 

  18. Baumann, C. G., Smith, S. B., Bloomfield, V. A. & Bustamante, C. Ionic effects on the elasticity of single DNA molecules. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 94, 6185–6190 (1997).

    Google Scholar 

  19. Chemla, Y. R. et al. Mechanism of force generation of a viral DNA packaging motor. Cell 122, 683–692 (2005).

    Google Scholar 

  20. Bustamante, C., Marko, J. F., Siggia, E. D. & Smith, S. Entropic elasticity of λ-phage DNA. Science 265, 1599–1600 (1994).

    Google Scholar 

  21. Liphardt, J., Onoa, B., Smith, S. B., Tinoco Jr, I. & Bustamante, C. Reversible unfolding of single RNA molecules by mechanical force. Science 292, 733–737 (2001).

    Google Scholar 

  22. Bennink, M. L. et al. Unfolding individual nucleosomes by stretching single chromatin fibers with optical tweezers. Nat. Struct. Biol. 8, 606–610 (2001).

    Google Scholar 

  23. Foroutannejad, S. et al. The cofactor-dependent folding mechanism of Drosophila cryptochrome revealed by single-molecule pulling experiments. Nat. Commun. 14, 1057 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  24. Hao, Y., Canavan, C., Taylor, S. S. & Maillard, R. A. Integrated method to attach DNA handles and functionally select proteins to study folding and protein-ligand interactions with optical tweezers. Sci. Rep. 7, 10843 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  25. Mickolajczyk, K. J., Olinares, P. D. B., Chait, B. T., Liu, S. & Kapoor, T. M. The MIDAS domain of AAA mechanoenzyme Mdn1 forms catch bonds with two different substrates. eLife 11, e73534 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  26. Smith, S. B., Cui, Y. & Bustamante, C. Overstretching B-DNA: the elastic response of individual double-stranded and single-stranded DNA molecules. Science 271, 795–799 (1996).

    Google Scholar 

  27. van Mameren, J. et al. Unraveling the structure of DNA during overstretching by using multicolor, single-molecule fluorescence imaging. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 106, 18231–18236 (2009).

    Google Scholar 

  28. Burghard-Schrod, M., Kilb, A., Krämer, K. & Graumann, P. L. Single-molecule dynamics of DNA receptor ComEA, membrane permease ComEC, and taken-Up DNA in competent Bacillus subtilis cells. J. Bacteriol. 204, 572 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  29. Peskin, C. S., Odell, G. M. & Oster, G. F. Cellular motions and thermal fluctuations: the Brownian ratchet. Biophys. J. 65, 316–324 (1993).

    Google Scholar 

  30. Uhl, M. & Seifert, U. Force-dependent diffusion coefficient of molecular Brownian ratchets. Phys. Rev. E 98, 022402 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  31. Rohde, M. The Gram-positive bacterial cell wall. Microbiol. Spectr. 7, gpp3–gpp2018 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  32. Dorman, C. J. H-NS: a universal regulator for a dynamic genome. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2, 391–400 (2004).

    Google Scholar 

  33. Wien, F. et al. Amyloid-like DNA bridging: a new mode of DNA shaping. Nucleic Acids Res. 53, gkaf169 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  34. Chen, J. M. et al. Lsr2 of Mycobacterium tuberculosis is a DNA-bridging protein. Nucleic Acids Res. 36, 2123–2135 (2008).

    Google Scholar 

  35. Erkelens, A. M. et al. The B. subtilis Rok protein is an atypical H-NS-like protein irresponsive to physico-chemical cues. Nucleic Acids Res. 50, 12166–12185 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  36. Harju, J. & Broedersz, C. P. Physical models of bacterial chromosomes. Mol. Microbiol. 123, 143–153 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  37. Graham, T. G. et al. ParB spreading requires DNA bridging. Genes Dev. 28, 1228–1238 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  38. Schumacher, M. A., Piro, K. M. & Xu, W. Insight into F plasmid DNA segregation revealed by structures of SopB and SopB–DNA complexes. Nucleic Acids Res. 38, 4514–4526 (2010).

    Google Scholar 

  39. Krämer, H. et al. lac repressor forms loops with linear DNA carrying two suitably spaced lac operators. EMBO J. 6, 1481 (1987).

    Google Scholar 

  40. Lobell, R. B. & Schleif, R. F. DNA looping and unlooping by AraC protein. Science 250, 528–532 (1990).

    Google Scholar 

  41. Ryu, J. et al. Bridging-induced phase separation induced by cohesin SMC protein complexes. Sci. Adv. 7, eabe5905 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  42. Umland, T. C., Wei, S., Craigie, R. & Davies, D. R. Structural basis of DNA bridging by barrier-to-autointegration factor. Biochemistry 39, 9130–9138 (2000).

    Google Scholar 

  43. Skoko, D. et al. Barrier-to-autointegration factor (BAF) condenses DNA by looping. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 106, 16610–16615 (2009).

    Google Scholar 

  44. Bell, N. A. & Molloy, J. E. Single-molecule force spectroscopy reveals binding and bridging dynamics of PARP1 and PARP2 at DNA double-strand breaks. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 120, e2214209120 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  45. Gien, H. et al. HIV-1 nucleocapsid protein binds double-stranded DNA in multiple modes to regulate compaction and capsid uncoating. Viruses 14, 235 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  46. Van den Broek, B. et al. Visualizing the formation and collapse of DNA toroids. Biophys. J. 98, 1902–1910 (2010).

    Google Scholar 

  47. Taylor, J. A. et al. Specific and non-specific interactions of ParB with DNA: implications for chromosome segregation. Nucleic Acids Res. 43, 719–731 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  48. Tišma, M. et al. Dynamic ParB–DNA interactions initiate and maintain a partition condensate for bacterial chromosome segregation. Nucleic Acids Res. 51, 11856–11875 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  49. Keenholtz, R. A. et al. Oligomerization and ATP stimulate condensin-mediated DNA compaction. Sci. Rep. 7, 1–13 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  50. Ganji, M. et al. Real-time imaging of DNA loop extrusion by condensin. Science 360, 102–105 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  51. Strick, T. R., Kawaguchi, T. & Hirano, T. Real-time detection of single-molecule DNA compaction by condensin I. Curr. Biol. 14, 874–880 (2004).

    Google Scholar 

  52. Wu, M. et al. Human topoisomerase iiα promotes chromatin condensation via a phase transition. Preprint at bioRxiv https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/2024.10.15.618281v1.full (2024).

  53. Joyeux, M. Role of salt valency in the switch of H-NS proteins between DNA-bridging and DNA-stiffening modes. Biophys. J. 114, 2317–2325 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  54. Amit, R., Oppenheim, A. B. & Stavans, J. Increased bending rigidity of single DNA molecules by H-NS, a temperature and osmolarity sensor. Biophys. J. 84, 2467–2473 (2003).

    Google Scholar 

  55. Liu, Y., Chen, H., Kenney, L. J. & Yan, J. A divalent switch drives H-NS/DNA-binding conformations between stiffening and bridging modes. Genes Dev. 24, 339–344 (2010).

    Google Scholar 

  56. Smith, S. B., Cui, Y. & Bustamante, C. in Methods in Enzymology 134–162 (Elsevier, 2003).

  57. Gieseler, J. et al. Optical tweezers—from calibration to applications: a tutorial. Adv. Opt. Photonics 13, 74–241 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  58. Mickolajczyk, K. J. et al. Long-range intramolecular allostery and regulation in the dynein-like AAA protein Mdn1. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 117, 18459–18469 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  59. Mickolajczyk, K. J. et al. Force-dependent stimulation of RNA unwinding by SARS-CoV-2 nsp13 helicase. Biophys. J. 120, 1020–1030 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  60. Gao, X. et al. Functional characterization of core components of the Bacillus subtilis cyclic-di-GMP signaling pathway. J. Bacteriol. 195, 4782–4792 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  61. Albano, M., Hahn, J. & Dubnau, D. Expression of competence genes in Bacillus subtilis. J. Bacteriol. 169, 3110–3117 (1987).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank members of the Mickolajczyk, Neiditch, and Dubnau Labs for useful discussions. We thank Rajesh Patel for his technical knowledge and the RWJMS Core EM facility that he manages. J.S. was supported by Rutgers IRACDA K12 GM093854 from the NIH. Support for this work was provided by the National Institutes of Health through grants R01GM057720 (M.B.N. and D.D.) and R35GM157075 (K.J.M.). Additional support was provided by a Busch Biomedical Grant from the Office for Research at Rutgers (K.J.M.).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, Rutgers University, Piscataway, NJ, USA

    Joshua I. Santiago, Abigail Rubino, Heonhwa Choi, Guy Adami & Keith J. Mickolajczyk

  2. Department of Microbiology, Biochemistry, and Molecular Genetics, New Jersey Medical School, Rutgers Biomedical Health Sciences, Newark, NJ, USA

    Ishtiyaq Ahmed, Jeanette Hahn, David Dubnau & Matthew B. Neiditch

  3. Public Health Research Institute, Rutgers Biomedical Health Sciences, Newark, NJ, USA

    Jeanette Hahn & David Dubnau

Authors
  1. Joshua I. Santiago
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Ishtiyaq Ahmed
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Jeanette Hahn
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Abigail Rubino
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Heonhwa Choi
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Guy Adami
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  7. David Dubnau
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Matthew B. Neiditch
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Keith J. Mickolajczyk
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

M.B.N., D.D., and K.J.M. conceived of the project. J.S., G.A., and K.J.M. carried out optical tweezer data acquisition and analysis. J.M., H.C., and A.R. carried out fluorescence polarization and electron microscopy experiments. I.A. prepared recombinant protein samples with guidance from M.B. J.H. carried out B. subtilis experiments with guidance from D.D. K.J.M. wrote the paper together with M.B.N. and D.D., and with input from all authors.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to David Dubnau, Matthew B. Neiditch or Keith J. Mickolajczyk.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Info (download PDF )

Reporting Summary (download PDF )

Transparent Peer Review file (download PDF )

Source data

Source Data (download XLSX )

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Santiago, J.I., Ahmed, I., Hahn, J. et al. Reversible DNA condensation drives natural transformation. Nat Commun (2026). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-026-70559-0

Download citation

  • Received: 24 September 2025

  • Accepted: 19 February 2026

  • Published: 19 March 2026

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-026-70559-0

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

Download PDF

Advertisement

Explore content

  • Research articles
  • Reviews & Analysis
  • News & Comment
  • Videos
  • Collections
  • Subjects
  • Follow us on Facebook
  • Follow us on X
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed

About the journal

  • Aims & Scope
  • Editors
  • Journal Information
  • Open Access Fees and Funding
  • Calls for Papers
  • Editorial Values Statement
  • Journal Metrics
  • Editors' Highlights
  • Contact
  • Editorial policies
  • Top Articles

Publish with us

  • For authors
  • For Reviewers
  • Language editing services
  • Open access funding
  • Submit manuscript

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

  • Explore articles by subject
  • Find a job
  • Guide to authors
  • Editorial policies

Nature Communications (Nat Commun)

ISSN 2041-1723 (online)

nature.com footer links

About Nature Portfolio

  • About us
  • Press releases
  • Press office
  • Contact us

Discover content

  • Journals A-Z
  • Articles by subject
  • protocols.io
  • Nature Index

Publishing policies

  • Nature portfolio policies
  • Open access

Author & Researcher services

  • Reprints & permissions
  • Research data
  • Language editing
  • Scientific editing
  • Nature Masterclasses
  • Research Solutions

Libraries & institutions

  • Librarian service & tools
  • Librarian portal
  • Open research
  • Recommend to library

Advertising & partnerships

  • Advertising
  • Partnerships & Services
  • Media kits
  • Branded content

Professional development

  • Nature Awards
  • Nature Careers
  • Nature Conferences

Regional websites

  • Nature Africa
  • Nature China
  • Nature India
  • Nature Japan
  • Nature Middle East
  • Privacy Policy
  • Use of cookies
  • Legal notice
  • Accessibility statement
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Your US state privacy rights
Springer Nature

© 2026 Springer Nature Limited

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing