Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Advertisement

Nature Communications
  • View all journals
  • Search
  • My Account Login
  • Content Explore content
  • About the journal
  • Publish with us
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed
  1. nature
  2. nature communications
  3. articles
  4. article
Biological traits predict species’ time-varying responses to multiple global change drivers
Download PDF
Download PDF
  • Article
  • Open access
  • Published: 14 March 2026

Biological traits predict species’ time-varying responses to multiple global change drivers

  • Takehiro Sasaki  ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0001-8727-91521,2,
  • Yuki Iwachido1,3,
  • Orlando Lam-Gordillo  ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0001-6805-62604,5,
  • Katie M. Cook  ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0002-2401-35224,
  • Emily J. Douglas  ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0002-9728-69434,
  • Rebecca V. Gladstone-Gallagher  ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0002-1745-20846,
  • Barry Greenfield4,
  • Sarah Hailes4,
  • Kelly Carter4,
  • Naohiro I. Ishii7,8,
  • Yoshiki Takayama1,2,
  • Shinji Shimode1,2,
  • Maiko Kagami1,2,
  • Judi E. Hewitt6,
  • Simon F. Thrush  ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0002-4005-38826 &
  • …
  • Andrew M. Lohrer  ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0002-3893-65392,4 

Nature Communications , Article number:  (2026) Cite this article

  • 2528 Accesses

  • 10 Altmetric

  • Metrics details

We are providing an unedited version of this manuscript to give early access to its findings. Before final publication, the manuscript will undergo further editing. Please note there may be errors present which affect the content, and all legal disclaimers apply.

Subjects

  • Climate-change ecology
  • Ecosystem ecology
  • Marine biology

Abstract

Multiple drivers of global change are causing rapid biodiversity loss worldwide. However, predicting species’ trajectories remains challenging due to the dynamic and state-dependent nature of ecological responses in real-world ecosystems. Here, we leverage nonlinear time series analysis of a multi-decadal, high-resolution dataset encompassing climate, freshwater, and sediment variables, alongside estuarine macroinvertebrate abundance. Our analysis shows that key biological traits, including body size, mobility, and lifespan predict the mean and variability of the time-varying sensitivity of species to specific environmental drivers. Species with smaller body sizes or lower mobility exhibit consistently negative responses to warming. The temporal variability of species sensitivity, an aspect often overlooked in previous studies of species’ environmental responses, is strongly associated with lifespan, with shorter-lived species showing greater fluctuations over time. These findings did not always align with results from controlled laboratory or short-term field experiments, highlighting the complex, state-dependent responses of species shaped by multiple drivers of global change. We introduce a framework that links biological traits to long-term environmental responses, providing a predictive basis for trait–sensitivity relationships.

Similar content being viewed by others

Quantifying the effects of response diversity dynamics on ecosystem stability

Article Open access 17 March 2026

Ocean warming and acidification adjust inter- and intra-specific variability in the functional trait expression of polar invertebrates

Article Open access 01 July 2024

Meta-analysis-derived estimates of stressor–response associations for riverine organism groups

Article Open access 11 November 2025

Data availability

The full-time series raw data analyzed in this study were provided with permission from Auckland Council, Waikato Regional Council, and Earth Sciences New Zealand and are subject to data use agreements; therefore, they are not publicly available. The supplementary data required for the essential steps in the analyses and for reproducing the results have been deposited in figshare106. Requests for access to the original data should be directed to the corresponding authors, who will coordinate with the data providers in accordance with the data use agreements.

Code availability

The code required to reproduce the results of this study, together with the supplementary dataset, has been deposited in figshare106.

References

  1. Komatsu, K. J. et al. Global change effects on plant communities are magnified by time and the number of global change factors imposed. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 116, 17867–17873 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Rillig, M. C. et al. The role of multiple global change factors in driving soil functions and microbial biodiversity. Science 366, 886–890 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Rillig, M. C. et al. Increasing the number of stressors reduces soil ecosystem services worldwide. Nat. Clim. Chang. 13, 478–483 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Reich, P. B. et al. Synergistic effects of four climate change drivers on terrestrial carbon cycling. Nat. Geosci. 13, 787–793 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Henn, J. J. et al. Long-term alpine plant responses to global change drivers depend on functional traits. Ecol. Lett. 27, e14518 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Ushio, M. et al. Fluctuating interaction network and time-varying stability of a natural fish community. Nature 554, 360–363 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Sasaki, T. et al. Dryland sensitivity to climate change and variability using nonlinear dynamics. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 120, e2305050120 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Deyle, E. R. et al. Predicting climate effects on Pacific sardine. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 110, 6430–6435 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Gallagher, R. V. et al. A guide to using species trait data in conservation. One Earth 4, 927–936 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Schleuning, M. et al. Trait-based assessments of climate-change impacts on interacting species. Trends Ecol. Evol. 35, 319–328 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Green, S. J., Brookson, C. B., Hardy, N. A. & Crowder, L. B. Trait-based approaches to global change ecology: moving from description to prediction. Proc. Biol. Sci. 289, 20220071 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  12. Pacifici, M. et al. Species’ traits influenced their response to recent climate change. Nat. Clim. Chang. 7, 205–208 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  13. Wilcox, K. R. et al. Plant traits related to precipitation sensitivity of species and communities in semiarid shortgrass prairie. N. Phytol. 229, 2007–2019 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  14. Thrush, S. F., Hewitt, J. E. & Cummings, V. J. Muddy waters: elevating sediment input to coastal and estuarine habitats. Front. Ecol. Environ. 2, 299–306 (2004).

    Google Scholar 

  15. Lohrer, A., Thrush, S. & Gibbs, M. Bioturbators enhance ecosystem function through complex biogeochemical interactions. Nature 431, 1092–1095 (2004).

    Google Scholar 

  16. Griffiths, J. R. et al. The importance of benthic-pelagic coupling for marine ecosystem functioning in a changing world. Glob. Chang. Biol. 23, 2179–2196 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  17. Costanza, R., Michael Kemp, W. & Boynton, W. R. Predictability, scale, and biodiversity in coastal and estuarine ecosystems: implications for management. Ambio 88, 96 (1993).

    Google Scholar 

  18. Bulmer, R. H. et al. Blue carbon habitats in Aotearoa New Zealand—opportunities for conservation, restoration, and carbon sequestration. Restor. Ecol. 32, e14225 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  19. Robins, P. E. et al. Impact of climate change on UK estuaries: a review of past trends and potential projections. Estuar. Coast. Shelf Sci. 169, 119–135 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  20. Clark, D. E. et al. Influence of land-derived stressors and environmental variability on compositional turnover and diversity of estuarine benthic communities. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 666, 1–18 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  21. Pelletier, M. et al. Benthic macroinvertebrate community response to environmental changes over seven decades in an urbanized estuary in the northeastern United States. Mar. Environ. Res. 169, 105323 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  22. Smith, K. E. et al. Biological impacts of marine heatwaves. Ann. Rev. Mar. Sci. 15, 119–145 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  23. Hewitt, J. E., Ellis, J. I. & Thrush, S. F. Multiple stressors, nonlinear effects and the implications of climate change impacts on marine coastal ecosystems. Glob. Chang. Biol. 22, 2665–2675 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  24. Lenoir, J. et al. Species better track climate warming in the oceans than on land. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 4, 1044–1059 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  25. Pinsky, M., Eikeset, A. M., McCauley, D., Payne, J. & Sunday, J. Greater vulnerability to warming of marine versus terrestrial ectotherms. Nature 569, 108–111 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  26. Sunday, J., Bates, A. & Dulvy, N. Thermal tolerance and the global redistribution of animals. Nat. Clim. Change 2, 686–690 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  27. Pinsky, M. L., Selden, R. L. & Kitchel, Z. J. Climate-driven shifts in marine species ranges: Scaling from organisms to communities. Ann. Rev. Mar. Sci. 12, 153–179 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  28. Winther, J.-G. et al. Integrated ocean management for a sustainable ocean economy. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 4, 1451–1458 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  29. Sugihara, G. et al. Detecting causality in complex ecosystems. Science 338, 496–500 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  30. Deyle, E. R., Maher, M. C., Hernandez, R. D., Basu, S. & Sugihara, G. Global environmental drivers of influenza. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 113, 13081–13086 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  31. Chang, C. W., Ushio, M. & Hsieh, C. H. Empirical dynamic modeling for beginners. Ecol. Res. 32, 785–796 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  32. Ye, H. et al. Equation-free mechanistic ecosystem forecasting using empirical dynamic modeling. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 112, E1569–E1576 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  33. Grace, J. B. et al. Causal interpretations can be based on mechanistic knowledge. J. Ecol. 113, 3084–3098 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  34. Sugihara, G., Grenfell, B. T., May, R. M. & Tong, H. Nonlinear forecasting for the classification of natural time series. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. Ser. A 348, 477–495 (1994).

    Google Scholar 

  35. Cenci, S., Sugihara, G. & Saavedra, S. Regularized S-map for inference and forecasting with noisy ecological time series. Methods Ecol. Evol. 10, 650–660 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  36. Hsieh, C.-H., Glaser, S. M., Lucas, A. J. & Sugihara, G. Distinguishing random environmental fluctuations from ecological catastrophes for the North Pacific Ocean. Nature 435, 336–340 (2005).

    Google Scholar 

  37. Craine, J. M. et al. Timing of climate variability and grassland productivity. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 109, 3401–3405 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  38. Chang, C.-W. et al. Reconstructing large interaction networks from empirical time series data. Ecol. Lett. 24, 2763–2774 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  39. Lam-Gordillo, O., Lohrer, A., Hewitt, J. & Dittmann, S. NZTD—The New Zealand Trait Database for shallow-water marine benthic invertebrates. Sci. Data 10, 502 (2023).

  40. Bolam, S. G., Cooper, K. & Downie, A.-L. Mapping marine benthic biological traits to facilitate future sustainable development. Ecol. Appl. 33, e2905 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  41. Morim, T., Henriques, S., Vasconcelos, R. & Dolbeth, M. A roadmap to define and select aquatic biological traits at different scales of analysis. Sci. Rep. 13, 22947 (2023).

  42. McLaverty, C., Dinesen, G. E., Gislason, H., Brooks, M. E. & Eigaard, O. R. Biological traits of benthic macrofauna show sizebased differences in response to bottom trawling intensity. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 671, 1–19 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  43. Millien, V. et al. Ecotypic variation in the context of global climate change: revisiting the rules. Ecol. Lett. 9, 853–869 (2006).

    Google Scholar 

  44. Verberk, W. C. E. P. et al. Shrinking body sizes in response to warming: explanations for the temperature-size rule with special emphasis on the role of oxygen. Biol. Rev. 96, 247–268 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  45. Lauchlan, S. S. & Nagelkerken, I. Species range shifts along multistressor mosaics in estuarine environments under future climate. Fish. Fish. (Oxf.) 21, 32–46 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  46. Forster, J., Hirst, A. G. & Atkinson, D. Warming-induced reductions in body size are greater in aquatic than terrestrial species. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 109, 19310–19314 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  47. Peck, L. S., Clark, M. S., Morley, S. A., Massey, A. & Rossetti, H. Animal temperature limits and ecological relevance: effects of size, activity and rates of change. Funct. Ecol. 23, 248–256 (2009).

    Google Scholar 

  48. Deutsch, C. et al. Impact of warming on aquatic body sizes explained by metabolic scaling from microbes to macrofauna. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 119, e2201345119 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  49. Bonacina, L., Fasano, F., Mezzanotte, V. & Fornaroli, R. Effects of water temperature on freshwater macroinvertebrates: a systematic review. Biol. Rev. 98, 191–221 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  50. Scapini, F., Innocenti Degli, E. & Defeo, O. Behavioral adaptations of sandy beach macrofauna in face of climate change impacts: a conceptual framework. Estuar. Coast. Shelf Sci. 225, 106236 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  51. Boscolo-Galazzo, F., Crichton, K. A., Barker, S. & Pearson, P. N. Temperature dependency of metabolic rates in the upper ocean: a positive feedback to global climate change? Glob. Planet. Change 170, 201–212 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  52. Solokas, M. A. et al. Shrinking body size and climate warming: many freshwater salmonids do not follow the rule. Glob. Chang. Biol. 29, 2478–2492 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  53. Nelson, D. et al. Experimental whole-stream warming alters community size structure. Glob. Chang. Biol. 23, 2618–2628 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  54. Waples, R. S. & Audzijonyte, A. Fishery-induced evolution provides insights into adaptive responses of marine species to climate change. Front. Ecol. Environ. 14, 217–224 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  55. Chessman, B. C. Identifying species at risk from climate change: traits predict the drought vulnerability of freshwater fishes. Biol. Conserv. 160, 40–49 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  56. Rubalcaba, J. G. Metabolic responses to cold and warm extremes in the ocean. PLoS Biol. 22, e3002479 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  57. Dayem, K. E., Noone, D. C. & Molnar, P. Tropical western Pacific warm pool and maritime continent precipitation rates and their contrasting relationships with the Walker Circulation. J. Geophys. Res. 112, D06101 (2007).

    Google Scholar 

  58. Arbi, I., Liu, S., Zhang, J., Wu, Y. & Huang, X. Detection of terrigenous and marine organic matter flow into a eutrophic semi-enclosed bay by δ13C and δ15N of intertidal macrobenthos and basal food sources. Sci. Total Environ. 613, 847–860 (2018). 614.

    Google Scholar 

  59. Szczepanek, M., Silberberger, M. J., Koziorowska-Makuch, K., Nobili, E. & Kędra, M. The response of coastal macrobenthic food-web structure to seasonal and regional variability in organic matter properties. Ecol. Indic. 132, 108326 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  60. Huot, Y. et al. Relationship between photosynthetic parameters and different proxies of phytoplankton biomass in the subtropical ocean. Biogeosciences 4, 853–868 (2007).

    Google Scholar 

  61. Thrush, S. F. et al. Habitat change in estuaries: predicting broad-scale responses of intertidal macrofauna to sediment mud content. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 263, 101–112 (2003).

    Google Scholar 

  62. Lohrer, A. M., Hewitt, J. E. & Thrush, S. F. Assessing far-field effects of terrigenous sediment loading in the coastal marine environment. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 315, 13–18 (2006).

    Google Scholar 

  63. Lohrer, A. M. et al. Terrestrially derived sediment: response of marine macrobenthic communities to thin terrigenous deposits. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 273, 121–138 (2004).

    Google Scholar 

  64. Lohrer, A. M. et al. Deposition of terrigenous sediment on subtidal marine macrobenthos: response of two contrasting community types. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 307, 115–125 (2006).

    Google Scholar 

  65. Ellis, J. et al. Predicting macrofaunal species distributions in estuarine gradients using logistic regression and classification systems. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 316, 69–83 (2006).

    Google Scholar 

  66. Anderson, M. J. Animal-sediment relationships re-visited: Characterising species’ distributions along an environmental gradient using canonical analysis and quantile regression splines. J. Exp. Mar. Bio. Ecol. 366, 16–27 (2008).

    Google Scholar 

  67. Pennock, C. A., Budy, P., Atkinson, C. L. & Barrett, N. Effects of increased temperature on arctic slimy sculpin Cottus cognatus is mediated by food availability: Implications for climate change. Freshw. Biol. 66, 549–561 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  68. Lamb, R. W., Smith, F. & Witman, J. D. Consumer mobility predicts impacts of herbivory across an environmental stress gradient. Ecology 101, e02910 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  69. Beauchard, O., Veríssimo, H., Queirós, A. M. & Herman, P. M. J. The use of multiple biological traits in marine community ecology and its potential in ecological indicator development. Ecol. Indic. 76, 81–96 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  70. Krause, J. R., Roden, A., Briceño, H. & Fourqurean, J. W. Climate oscillations drive nutrient availability and seagrass abundance at a regional scale. Limnol. Oceanogr. https://doi.org/10.1002/lno.12787 (2025)

  71. Basterretxea, G., Font-Muñoz, J. S., Hernández-Carrasco, I. & Sañudo-Wilhelmy, S. A. Global variability of high-nutrient low-chlorophyll regions using neural networks and wavelet coherence analysis. Ocean Sci. 19, 973–990 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  72. Pruett, J. L. et al. Life-stage-dependent effects of multiple flood-associated stressors on a coastal foundational species. Ecosphere 13, e4343 (2022).

  73. Pineda, M. C. et al. Tough adults, frail babies: an analysis of stress sensitivity across early life-history stages of widely introduced marine invertebrates. PLoS ONE 7, e46672 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  74. Carpenter, S. R. & Brock, W. A. Rising variance: a leading indicator of ecological transition: variance and ecological transition. Ecol. Lett. 9, 311–318 (2006).

    Google Scholar 

  75. Scheffer, M. et al. Anticipating critical transitions. Science 338, 344–348 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  76. Cohen, J. E., Jonsson, T. & Carpenter, S. R. Ecological community description using the food web, species abundance, and body size. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 100, 1781–1786 (2003).

    Google Scholar 

  77. Senti, T. & Gifford, M. Seasonal and taxonomic variation in arthropod macronutrient content. Food Webs 38, e00328 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  78. Lam-Gordillo, O., Baring, R. & Dittmann, S. Taxonomic and functional patterns of benthic communities in southern temperate tidal flats. Front. Mar. Sci. 8, 723749 (2021).

  79. Ross, S. R. P.-J. & Sasaki, T. Limited theoretical and empirical evidence that response diversity determines the resilience of ecosystems to environmental change. Ecol. Res. https://doi.org/10.1111/1440-1703.12434 (2023)

  80. LaDeau, S. L., Han, B. A., Rosi-Marshall, E. J. & Weathers, K. C. The next decade of big data in ecosystem science. Ecosystems 20, 274–283 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  81. Hampton, S. E. et al. Big data and the future of ecology. Front. Ecol. Environ. 11, 156–162 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  82. Thrush, S. F. et al. The Many Uses and Values of Estuarine Ecosystems. Ecosystem Services in New Zealand–conditions and Trends. (Manaaki Whenua Press, Lincoln, New Zealand, 2013) pp 226–237.

  83. Hewitt, J. & Gibbs, M. Assessment of the Estuarine Ecological Monitoring Programme to 2010 (2012).

  84. Lam-Gordillo, O. et al. Climatic, oceanic, freshwater, and local environmental drivers of New Zealand estuarine macroinvertebrates. Mar. Environ. Res. 197, 106472 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  85. Hyndman, R. obJ. & Khandakar, Y. easmin Automatic time series forecasting: the forecast Package for R. J. Stat. Softw. 27, 22 (2008).

    Google Scholar 

  86. Ministry for the Environment of New Zealand. Resource Management Act 1991. (1991).

  87. Douglas, E. J. et al. Macrofaunal functional diversity provides resilience to nutrient enrichment in coastal sediments. Ecosystems 20, 1324–1336 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  88. Lam-Gordillo, O. et al. Integrating rapid habitat mapping with community metrics and functional traits to assess estuarine ecological conditions: a New Zealand case study. Mar. Pollut. Bull. 206, 116717 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  89. Greenfield, B. L. et al. Protocol for the identification of Benthic Estuarine and marine macroinvertebrates: a guide for parataxonomists. C-SIG Coastal Taxonomic Resource Tool https://www.coastalsociety.org.nz/content/view/publications/c-sig-species-heys-coastal-taxonomic-resource-tool/ (2023).

  90. Hewitt, J. E., Hailes, S. F., Greenfield, B. L. Protocol for Processing, Identification and Quality Assurance of New Zealand Marine Benthic Invertebrate Samples. Prepared for Northland Regional Council 36 (2014).

  91. Whitehead, A. L. & Booker, D. J. Communicating biophysical conditions across New Zealand’s rivers using an interactive webtool. N. Z. J. Mar. Freshw. Res. 53, 278–287 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  92. Whitehead, A., Fraser, C. & Snelder, T. Spatial Modelling of River Water-Quality State: Incorporating Monitoring Data From 2016 to 2020. (NIWA Client Report 2022).

  93. Bandaragoda, C., Tarboton, D. G. & Woods, R. Application of TOPNET in the distributed model intercomparison project. J. Hydrol. (Amst.) 298, 178–201 (2004).

    Google Scholar 

  94. Douglas, E. J. et al. Sedimentary environment influences ecosystem response to nutrient enrichment. Estuaries Coast 41, 1994–2008 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  95. Knap, A. H., Michaels, A., Close, A. R. & Ducklow, H. Protocols for the Joint Global Ocean Flux Study (JGOFS) Core Measurements (1996).

  96. Douglas, E. J., Lohrer, A. M. & Pilditch, C. A. Biodiversity breakpoints along stress gradients in estuaries and associated shifts in ecosystem interactions. Sci. Rep. 9, 17567 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  97. Clark, T. et al. Spatial convergent cross mapping to detect causal relationships from short time series. Ecology 96, 1174–1181 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  98. Takens, F. Dynamical Systems and Turbulence. (Springer-Verlag, 1981) pp 366–381.

  99. Merz, E. et al. Disruption of ecological networks in lakes by climate change and nutrient fluctuations. Nat. Clim. Chang. 13, 389–396 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  100. Chang, C.-W. et al. Causal networks of phytoplankton diversity and biomass are modulated by environmental context. Nat. Commun. 13, 1140 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  101. Dittmann, S. et al. Drought and flood effects on macrobenthic communities in the estuary of Australia’s largest river system. Estuar. Coast. Shelf Sci. 165, 36–51 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  102. Ye, H., Deyle, E. R., Gilarranz, L. J. & Sugihara, G. Distinguishing time-delayed causal interactions using convergent cross mapping. Sci. Rep. 5, 1–9 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  103. Wilson, D. J. The harmonic mean p-value for combining dependent tests. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 116, 1195–1200 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  104. Ye, H., Clark, A., Deyle, E. & Sugihara, G. rEDM: an R package for Empirical Dynamic Modeling. 1–23 (2019).

  105. R Development Core Team. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing (2024).

  106. Sasaki, T. & Lohrer, A. M. Supplementary data and codes for the article: Biological traits predict species’ time-varying responses to multiple global change drivers. figshare https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.31245691 (2026).

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank the Auckland Council and the Waikato Regional Council for funding and their commitment to long-term macroinvertebrate monitoring in New Zealand estuaries. We gratefully acknowledge the field teams and Earth Sciences New Zealand parataxonomists for generating consistently robust time series datasets. This work was financially supported by bilateral collaboration project between New Zealand and Japan grant JPJSBP120241001 (T.S. and A.M.L.) from the Royal Society of New Zealand and the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology of Japan, Joint Research Program of Arid Land Research Center, Tottori University grant 06B2005 (T.S.), Asahi Glass Foundation (T.S.), New Zealand’s Strategic Science Investment Funding grant C01X0703 (A.M.L., O.L.G., and E.J.D.), and JST, CREST, Japan grant JPMJCR24J2 (M.K., S.S., and Y.T.).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Graduate School of Environment and Information Sciences, Yokohama National University, Yokohama, Japan

    Takehiro Sasaki, Yuki Iwachido, Yoshiki Takayama, Shinji Shimode & Maiko Kagami

  2. Institute for Multidisciplinary Sciences, Yokohama National University, Yokohama, Japan

    Takehiro Sasaki, Yoshiki Takayama, Shinji Shimode, Maiko Kagami & Andrew M. Lohrer

  3. Tokyo Metropolitan Research Institute for Environmental Protection, Tokyo, Japan

    Yuki Iwachido

  4. Earth Sciences New Zealand, Hamilton, New Zealand

    Orlando Lam-Gordillo, Katie M. Cook, Emily J. Douglas, Barry Greenfield, Sarah Hailes, Kelly Carter & Andrew M. Lohrer

  5. College of Science and Engineering, Flinders University, Adelaide, Australia

    Orlando Lam-Gordillo

  6. University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand

    Rebecca V. Gladstone-Gallagher, Judi E. Hewitt & Simon F. Thrush

  7. Arid Land Research Center, Tottori University, Tottori, Japan

    Naohiro I. Ishii

  8. Center for Environmental and Societal Sustainability, Gifu University, Gifu, Japan

    Naohiro I. Ishii

Authors
  1. Takehiro Sasaki
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Yuki Iwachido
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Orlando Lam-Gordillo
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Katie M. Cook
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Emily J. Douglas
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Rebecca V. Gladstone-Gallagher
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Barry Greenfield
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Sarah Hailes
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Kelly Carter
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  10. Naohiro I. Ishii
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  11. Yoshiki Takayama
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  12. Shinji Shimode
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  13. Maiko Kagami
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  14. Judi E. Hewitt
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  15. Simon F. Thrush
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  16. Andrew M. Lohrer
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

T.S., Y.I., O.L.G., K.M.C., E.J.D., R.V.G.G., B.G., S.H., K.C., N.I.I., Y.T., S.S., M.K., J.E.H., S.F.T., and A.M.L. contributed to the conceptualization of the study. Data curation was performed by O.L.G., Y.I., and T.S. Formal analyses were conducted by T.S. and Y.I. The original draft of the paper was written by T.S., Y.I., O.L.G., and A.M.L. T.S., Y.I., O.L.G., K.M.C., E.J.D., R.V.G.G., B.G., S.H., K.C., N.I.I., Y.T., S.S., M.K., J.E.H., S.F.T., and A.M.L. contributed to reviewing and editing the paper.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Takehiro Sasaki or Andrew M. Lohrer.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Peer review

Peer review information

Nature Communications thanks Leon Barmuta, who co-reviewed with Bridget Ellen White, and the other, anonymous, reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work. A peer review file is available.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Information (download PDF )

Reporting summary (download PDF )

Transparent Peer Review file (download PDF )

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if you modified the licensed material. You do not have permission under this licence to share adapted material derived from this article or parts of it. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Sasaki, T., Iwachido, Y., Lam-Gordillo, O. et al. Biological traits predict species’ time-varying responses to multiple global change drivers. Nat Commun (2026). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-026-70606-w

Download citation

  • Received: 06 August 2025

  • Accepted: 27 February 2026

  • Published: 14 March 2026

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-026-70606-w

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

Download PDF

Advertisement

Explore content

  • Research articles
  • Reviews & Analysis
  • News & Comment
  • Videos
  • Collections
  • Subjects
  • Follow us on Facebook
  • Follow us on X
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed

About the journal

  • Aims & Scope
  • Editors
  • Journal Information
  • Open Access Fees and Funding
  • Calls for Papers
  • Editorial Values Statement
  • Journal Metrics
  • Editors' Highlights
  • Contact
  • Editorial policies
  • Top Articles

Publish with us

  • For authors
  • For Reviewers
  • Language editing services
  • Open access funding
  • Submit manuscript

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

  • Explore articles by subject
  • Find a job
  • Guide to authors
  • Editorial policies

Nature Communications (Nat Commun)

ISSN 2041-1723 (online)

nature.com footer links

About Nature Portfolio

  • About us
  • Press releases
  • Press office
  • Contact us

Discover content

  • Journals A-Z
  • Articles by subject
  • protocols.io
  • Nature Index

Publishing policies

  • Nature portfolio policies
  • Open access

Author & Researcher services

  • Reprints & permissions
  • Research data
  • Language editing
  • Scientific editing
  • Nature Masterclasses
  • Research Solutions

Libraries & institutions

  • Librarian service & tools
  • Librarian portal
  • Open research
  • Recommend to library

Advertising & partnerships

  • Advertising
  • Partnerships & Services
  • Media kits
  • Branded content

Professional development

  • Nature Awards
  • Nature Careers
  • Nature Conferences

Regional websites

  • Nature Africa
  • Nature China
  • Nature India
  • Nature Japan
  • Nature Middle East
  • Privacy Policy
  • Use of cookies
  • Legal notice
  • Accessibility statement
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Your US state privacy rights
Springer Nature

© 2026 Springer Nature Limited

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing