Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Advertisement

Nature Communications
  • View all journals
  • Search
  • My Account Login
  • Content Explore content
  • About the journal
  • Publish with us
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed
  1. nature
  2. nature communications
  3. articles
  4. article
Phosphoregulation of the novel hemi-arrestin MAPK scaffold Sms1 prevents untimely mating
Download PDF
Download PDF
  • Article
  • Open access
  • Published: 17 March 2026

Phosphoregulation of the novel hemi-arrestin MAPK scaffold Sms1 prevents untimely mating

  • Boris Sieber  ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0002-8145-33641,
  • Laura Merlini  ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0002-8355-95411,
  • Wanlan Li1,
  • Maëlys Besomi  ORCID: orcid.org/0009-0000-5485-70401,
  • Laetitia Michon  ORCID: orcid.org/0009-0006-7671-66801,
  • Sushila Gordon-Lennox1 &
  • …
  • Sophie G. Martin  ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0002-5317-25571 

Nature Communications , Article number:  (2026) Cite this article

  • 1394 Accesses

  • 1 Citations

  • 1 Altmetric

  • Metrics details

We are providing an unedited version of this manuscript to give early access to its findings. Before final publication, the manuscript will undergo further editing. Please note there may be errors present which affect the content, and all legal disclaimers apply.

Subjects

  • Cell polarity
  • Differentiation
  • Extracellular signalling molecules
  • Fungal biology

Abstract

Mitogen-activated protein kinases (MAPK) are ancestral kinases that form essential signalling cascades. However, scaffolds that recruit kinases to subcellular locations and promote signal transduction have only been described in a few species. Notably, no scaffold was thought necessary for the MAPK cascade promoting sexual differentiation in fission yeast. Here, we identify the hemi-arrestin protein Sms1 as a novel scaffold of this MAPK cascade. Interactions with PIP2 and the pheromone receptor–coupled Gα subunit target Sms1 to plasma membrane patches, where it assembles the active cascade by binding each MAP kinase. These interactions are essential for signal transduction and local signal interpretation for polarised growth. Phosphorylation, including by the MAPK itself, antagonises Sms1 membrane translocation, establishing a negative feedback that underlies polarity patch turnover and prevents untimely mating attempts. Thus, Sms1 is a MAPK scaffold with canonical functions despite its distinct structural fold, highlighting convergent evolution of MAPK scaffolds across eukaryotes.

Similar content being viewed by others

Structural basis for MEKK2 dimerization and substrate recognition

Article Open access 29 November 2025

Xbra modulates the activity of linker region phosphorylated Smad1 during Xenopus development

Article Open access 18 April 2024

MAP2K6 remodels chromatin and facilitates reprogramming by activating Gatad2b-phosphorylation dependent heterochromatin loosening

Article 24 November 2021

Data availability

Source data for all western blots and quantitative data are provided with this paper. Proteomic dataset is available in PRIDE (project PXD068764): https://www.ebi.ac.uk/pride/archive/projects/PXD068764. The imaging data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request. Source data are provided with this paper.

References

  1. Avruch, J. MAP kinase pathways: the first twenty years. Biochim. Biophys. Acta. 1773, 1150–1160 (2007).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Kalapos, B. et al. Early evolution of the mitogen-activated protein kinase family in the plant kingdom. Sci. Rep. 9, 4094 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Xu, C. et al. The diversification of evolutionarily conserved MAPK cascades correlates with the evolution of fungal species and the development of lifestyles. Genome Biol. Evol. 9, 311–322 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Widmann, C., Gibson, S., Jarpe, M. B. & Johnson, G. L. Mitogen-activated protein kinase: conservation of a three-kinase module from yeast to human. Physiol. Rev. 79, 143–180 (1999).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Huang, E. J. et al. Refined phylogenetic ortholog inference reveals coevolutionary expansion of the MAPK signaling network through finetuning of pathway specificity. J. Mol. Evol. 93, 423–440 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Park, S. H., Zarrinpar, A. & Lim, W. A. Rewiring MAP kinase pathways using alternative scaffold assembly mechanisms. Science 299, 1061–1064 (2003).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Witzel, F., Maddison, L. & Bluthgen, N. How scaffolds shape MAPK signaling: what we know and opportunities for systems approaches. Front Physiol. 3, 475 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Choi, K. Y., Satterberg, B., Lyons, D. M. & Elion, E. A. Ste5 tethers multiple protein kinases in the MAP kinase cascade required for mating in S. cerevisiae. Cell 78, 499–512 (1994).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Kranz, J. E., Satterberg, B. & Elion, E. A. The MAP kinase Fus3 associates with and phosphorylates the upstream signaling component Ste5. Genes Dev. 8, 313–327 (1994).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Marcus, S., Polverino, A., Barr, M. & Wigler, M. Complexes between STE5 and components of the pheromone-responsive mitogen-activated protein kinase module. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 91, 7762–7766 (1994).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Printen, J. A. & Sprague, G. F. Jr. Protein–protein interactions in the yeast pheromone response pathway: Ste5p interacts with all members of the MAP kinase cascade. Genetics 138, 609–619 (1994).

    Google Scholar 

  12. Frodyma, D., Neilsen, B., Costanzo-Garvey, D., Fisher, K. & Lewis, R. Coordinating ERK signaling via the molecular scaffold Kinase suppressor of Ras. F1000Res 6, 1621 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  13. Gurevich V. V. Arrestins: a small family of multi-functional proteins. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 25, 6284 (2024).

  14. DeFea, K. A. et al. beta-arrestin-dependent endocytosis of proteinase-activated receptor 2 is required for intracellular targeting of activated ERK1/2. J. Cell Biol. 148, 1267–1281 (2000).

    Google Scholar 

  15. Luttrell, L. M. et al. Activation and targeting of extracellular signal-regulated kinases by beta-arrestin scaffolds. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 98, 2449–2454 (2001).

    Google Scholar 

  16. Tohgo, A., Pierce, K. L., Choy, E. W., Lefkowitz, R. J. & Luttrell, L. M. beta-Arrestin scaffolding of the ERK cascade enhances cytosolic ERK activity but inhibits ERK-mediated transcription following angiotensin AT1a receptor stimulation. J. Biol. Chem. 277, 9429–9436 (2002).

    Google Scholar 

  17. Inouye, C., Dhillon, N., Durfee, T., Zambryski, P. C. & Thorner, J. Mutational analysis of STE5 in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae: application of a differential interaction trap assay for examining protein–protein interactions. Genetics 147, 479–492 (1997).

    Google Scholar 

  18. McKay, M. M., Ritt, D. A. & Morrison, D. K. Signaling dynamics of the KSR1 scaffold complex. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 106, 11022–11027 (2009).

    Google Scholar 

  19. Qu C., Park J. Y., Yun M. W., He Q. T., Yang F., et al. Scaffolding mechanism of arrestin-2 in the cRaf/MEK1/ERK signaling cascade. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 118, e2026491118 (2021).

  20. Good, M., Tang, G., Singleton, J., Remenyi, A. & Lim, W. A. The Ste5 scaffold directs mating signaling by catalytically unlocking the Fus3 MAP kinase for activation. Cell 136, 1085–1097 (2009).

    Google Scholar 

  21. Ory, S., Zhou, M., Conrads, T. P., Veenstra, T. D. & Morrison, D. K. Protein phosphatase 2A positively regulates Ras signaling by dephosphorylating KSR1 and Raf-1 on critical 14-3-3 binding sites. Curr. Biol. 13, 1356–1364 (2003).

    Google Scholar 

  22. Zalatan, J. G., Coyle, S. M., Rajan, S., Sidhu, S. S. & Lim, W. A. Conformational control of the Ste5 scaffold protein insulates against MAP kinase misactivation. Science 337, 1218–1222 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  23. Bhattacharyya, R. P. et al. The Ste5 scaffold allosterically modulates signaling output of the yeast mating pathway. Science 311, 822–826 (2006).

    Google Scholar 

  24. Brennan, D. F. et al. A Raf-induced allosteric transition of KSR stimulates phosphorylation of MEK. Nature 472, 366–369 (2011).

    Google Scholar 

  25. Zang, Y., Kahsai, A. W., Pakharukova, N., Huang, L. Y. & Lefkowitz, R. J. The GPCR-beta-arrestin complex allosterically activates C-Raf by binding its amino terminus. J. Biol. Chem. 297, 101369 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  26. Kahsai, A. W. et al. Signal transduction at GPCRs: allosteric activation of the ERK MAPK by beta-arrestin. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 120, e2303794120 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  27. Lavoie, H. et al. MEK drives BRAF activation through allosteric control of KSR proteins. Nature 554, 549–553 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  28. Dhanasekaran, D. N., Kashef, K., Lee, C. M., Xu, H. & Reddy, E. P. Scaffold proteins of MAP-kinase modules. Oncogene 26, 3185–3202 (2007).

    Google Scholar 

  29. Garrenton, L. S., Young, S. L. & Thorner, J. Function of the MAPK scaffold protein, Ste5, requires a cryptic PH domain. Genes Dev. 20, 1946–1958 (2006).

    Google Scholar 

  30. Pryciak, P. M. & Huntress, F. A. Membrane recruitment of the kinase cascade scaffold protein Ste5 by the Gbetagamma complex underlies activation of the yeast pheromone response pathway. Genes Dev. 12, 2684–2697 (1998).

    Google Scholar 

  31. Winters, M. J., Lamson, R. E., Nakanishi, H., Neiman, A. M. & Pryciak, P. M. A membrane binding domain in the ste5 scaffold synergizes with gbetagamma binding to control localization and signaling in pheromone response. Mol. Cell 20, 21–32 (2005).

    Google Scholar 

  32. Eichel, K., Jullie, D. & von Zastrow, M. beta-Arrestin drives MAP kinase signalling from clathrin-coated structures after GPCR dissociation. Nat. Cell Biol. 18, 303–310 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  33. Yin, X. et al. A ceramide-binding C1 domain mediates kinase suppressor of ras membrane translocation. Cell Physiol. Biochem. 24, 219–230 (2009).

    Google Scholar 

  34. Bell, B., Xing, H., Yan, K., Gautam, N. & Muslin, A. J. KSR-1 binds to G-protein betagamma subunits and inhibits beta gamma-induced mitogen-activated protein kinase activation. J. Biol. Chem. 274, 7982–7986 (1999).

    Google Scholar 

  35. Repetto, M. V. et al. CDK and MAPK synergistically regulate signaling dynamics via a shared multi-site phosphorylation region on the scaffold protein Ste5. Mol. Cell 69, 938–952 e936 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  36. Strickfaden, S. C. et al. A mechanism for cell-cycle regulation of MAP kinase signaling in a yeast differentiation pathway. Cell 128, 519–531 (2007).

    Google Scholar 

  37. van Drogen, F. et al. Mechanical stress impairs pheromone signaling via Pkc1-mediated regulation of the MAPK scaffold Ste5. J. Cell Biol. 218, 3117–3133 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  38. Yu, L., Qi, M., Sheff, M. A. & Elion, E. A. Counteractive control of polarized morphogenesis during mating by mitogen-activated protein kinase Fus3 and G1 cyclin-dependent kinase. Mol. Biol. Cell 19, 1739–1752 (2008).

    Google Scholar 

  39. Winters, M. J. & Pryciak, P. M. MAPK modulation of yeast pheromone signaling output and the role of phosphorylation sites in the scaffold protein Ste5. Mol. Biol. Cell 30, 1037–1049 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  40. Cacace, A. M. et al. Identification of constitutive and ras-inducible phosphorylation sites of KSR: implications for 14-3-3 binding, mitogen-activated protein kinase binding, and KSR overexpression. Mol. Cell Biol. 19, 229–240 (1999).

    Google Scholar 

  41. Muller, J., Ory, S., Copeland, T., Piwnica-Worms, H. & Morrison, D. K. C-TAK1 regulates Ras signaling by phosphorylating the MAPK scaffold, KSR1. Mol. Cell 8, 983–993 (2001).

    Google Scholar 

  42. Lin, F. T. et al. Clathrin-mediated endocytosis of the beta-adrenergic receptor is regulated by phosphorylation/dephosphorylation of beta-arrestin1. J. Biol. Chem. 272, 31051–31057 (1997).

    Google Scholar 

  43. Lin, F. T., Miller, W. E., Luttrell, L. M. & Lefkowitz, R. J. Feedback regulation of beta-arrestin1 function by extracellular signal-regulated kinases. J. Biol. Chem. 274, 15971–15974 (1999).

    Google Scholar 

  44. Alvarez, C. E. On the origins of arrestin and rhodopsin. BMC Evol. Biol. 8, 222 (2008).

    Google Scholar 

  45. Cote, P., Sulea, T., Dignard, D., Wu, C. & Whiteway, M. Evolutionary reshaping of fungal mating pathway scaffold proteins. mBio 2, e00230–00210 (2011).

    Google Scholar 

  46. Hughes, D. A., Ashworth, A. & Marshall, C. J. Complementation of byr1 in fission yeast by mammalian MAP kinase kinase requires coexpression of Raf kinase. Nature 364, 349–352 (1993).

    Google Scholar 

  47. Neiman, A. M. et al. Functional homology of protein kinases required for sexual differentiation in Schizosaccharomyces pombe and Saccharomyces cerevisiae suggests a conserved signal transduction module in eukaryotic organisms. Mol. Biol. Cell 4, 107–120 (1993).

    Google Scholar 

  48. Xu, H. P., White, M., Marcus, S. & Wigler, M. Concerted action of RAS and G proteins in the sexual response pathways of Schizosaccharomyces pombe. Mol. Cell Biol. 14, 50–58 (1994).

    Google Scholar 

  49. Davey, J. Fusion of a fission yeast. Yeast 14, 1529–1566 (1998).

    Google Scholar 

  50. Sieber, B., Coronas-Serna, J. M. & Martin, S. G. A focus on yeast mating: from pheromone signaling to cell–cell fusion. Semin Cell Dev. Biol. 133, 83–95 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  51. Merlini, L., Dudin, O. & Martin, S. G. Mate and fuse: how yeast cells do it. Open Biol. 3, 130008 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  52. Hoffman, C. S. Except in every detail: comparing and contrasting G-protein signaling in Saccharomyces cerevisiae and Schizosaccharomyces pombe. Eukaryot. Cell 4, 495–503 (2005).

    Google Scholar 

  53. Hughes, D. A. Control of signal transduction and morphogenesis by Ras. Semin Cell Biol. 6, 89–94 (1995).

    Google Scholar 

  54. Barr, M. M., Tu, H., Van Aelst, L. & Wigler, M. Identification of Ste4 as a potential regulator of Byr2 in the sexual response pathway of Schizosaccharomyces pombe. Mol. Cell Biol. 16, 5597–5603 (1996).

    Google Scholar 

  55. Tu, H., Barr, M., Dong, D. L. & Wigler, M. Multiple regulatory domains on the Byr2 protein kinase. Mol. Cell Biol. 17, 5876–5887 (1997).

    Google Scholar 

  56. Kawamukai, M. Regulation of sexual differentiation initiation in Schizosaccharomyces pombe. Biosci. Biotechnol. Biochem. 88, 475–492 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  57. Mata, J. & Bahler, J. Global roles of Ste11p, cell type, and pheromone in the control of gene expression during early sexual differentiation in fission yeast. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 103, 15517–15522 (2006).

    Google Scholar 

  58. Kjaerulff, S., Lautrup-Larsen, I., Truelsen, S., Pedersen, M. & Nielsen, O. Constitutive activation of the fission yeast pheromone-responsive pathway induces ectopic meiosis and reveals ste11 as a mitogen-activated protein kinase target. Mol. Cell Biol. 25, 2045–2059 (2005).

    Google Scholar 

  59. Vjestica, A. et al. Cell cycle-dependent and independent mating blocks ensure fungal zygote survival and ploidy maintenance. PLoS Biol. 19, e3001067 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  60. Vjestica, A., Merlini, L., Nkosi, P. J. & Martin, S. G. Gamete fusion triggers bipartite transcription factor assembly to block re-fertilization. Nature 560, 397–400 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  61. Bendezu, F. O. & Martin, S. G. Cdc42 explores the cell periphery for mate selection in fission yeast. Curr. Biol. 23, 42–47 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  62. Merlini, L. et al. Local pheromone release from dynamic polarity sites underlies cell–cell pairing during yeast mating. Curr. Biol. 26, 1117–1125 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  63. Dyer, J. M. et al. Tracking shallow chemical gradients by actin-driven wandering of the polarization site. Curr. Biol. 23, 32–41 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  64. McClure, A. W. et al. Role of polarized G protein signaling in tracking pheromone gradients. Dev. Cell 35, 471–482 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  65. Ghose D., Jacobs K., Ramirez S., Elston T., Lew D. Chemotactic movement of a polarity site enables yeast cells to find their mates. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 118, e2025445118 (2021).

  66. Wang, X. et al. Mating yeast cells use an intrinsic polarity site to assemble a pheromone-gradient tracking machine. J. Cell Biol. 218, 3730–3752 (2019).

  67. Merlini, L. et al. Inhibition of Ras activity coordinates cell fusion with cell-cell contact during yeast mating. J. Cell Biol. 217, 1467–1483 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  68. Khalili, B., Merlini, L., Vincenzetti, V., Martin, S. G. & Vavylonis, D. Exploration and stabilization of Ras1 mating zone: a mechanism with positive and negative feedbacks. PLoS Comput. Biol. 14, e1006317 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  69. Dudin, O., Merlini, L. & Martin, S. G. Spatial focalization of pheromone/MAPK signaling triggers commitment to cell–cell fusion. Genes Dev. 30, 2226–2239 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  70. Matsuyama, A., Yabana, N., Watanabe, Y. & Yamamoto, M. Schizosaccharomyces pombe Ste7p is required for both promotion and withholding of the entry to meiosis. Genetics 155, 539–549 (2000).

    Google Scholar 

  71. Vitali D. G., Fonseca D, Carvalho P. The derlin Dfm1 couples retrotranslocation of a folded protein domain to its proteasomal degradation. J. Cell Biol. 223, e202308074 (2024).

  72. Klug, Y. A. et al. Mechanism of lipid droplet formation by the yeast Sei1/Ldb16 Seipin complex. Nat. Commun. 12, 5892 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  73. Kelsall E. J., et al. Constitutively active RAS prolongs Cdc42 signalling while attenuating MAPK signalling during fission yeast mating. Preprint at https://doi.org/10.1101/2025.03.06.641927 (2025).

  74. Jung, K. W., Kim, S. Y., Okagaki, L. H., Nielsen, K. & Bahn, Y. S. Ste50 adaptor protein governs sexual differentiation of Cryptococcus neoformans via the pheromone-response MAPK signaling pathway. Fungal Genet. Biol. 48, 154–165 (2011).

    Google Scholar 

  75. Truckses, D. M., Bloomekatz, J. E. & Thorner, J. The RA domain of Ste50 adaptor protein is required for delivery of Ste11 to the plasma membrane in the filamentous growth signaling pathway of the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol. Cell Biol. 26, 912–928 (2006).

    Google Scholar 

  76. Okazaki, N., Okazaki, K., Tanaka, K. & Okayama, H. The ste4+ gene, essential for sexual differentiation of Schizosaccharomyces pombe, encodes a protein with a leucine zipper motif. Nucleic Acids Res. 19, 7043–7047 (1991).

    Google Scholar 

  77. Obara, T., Nakafuku, M., Yamamoto, M. & Kaziro, Y. Isolation and characterization of a gene encoding a G-protein alpha subunit from Schizosaccharomyces pombe: involvement in mating and sporulation pathways. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 88, 5877–5881 (1991).

    Google Scholar 

  78. Nadin-Davis, S. A. & Nasim, A. A gene that encodes a predicted protein kinase can restore some functions of the ras gene in fission yeast. Embo J. 7, 985–993 (1988).

    Google Scholar 

  79. Aymoz, D., Wosika, V., Durandau, E. & Pelet, S. Real-time quantification of protein expression at the single-cell level via dynamic protein synthesis translocation reporters. Nat. Commun. 7, 11304 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  80. Styrkarsdottir, U., Egel, R. & Nielsen, O. Functional conservation between Schizosaccharomyces pombe ste8 and Saccharomyces cerevisiae STE11 protein kinases in yeast signal transduction. Mol. Gen. Genet. 235, 122–130 (1992).

    Google Scholar 

  81. Anandhakumar, J., Fauquenoy, S., Materne, P., Migeot, V. & Hermand, D. Regulation of entry into gametogenesis by Ste11: the endless game. Biochem. Soc. Trans. 41, 1673–1678 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  82. Ramachander, R. et al. Oligomerization-dependent association of the SAM domains from Schizosaccharomyces pombe Byr2 and Ste4. J. Biol. Chem. 277, 39585–39593 (2002).

    Google Scholar 

  83. Jumper, J. et al. Highly accurate protein structure prediction with AlphaFold. Nature 596, 583–589 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  84. Mirdita, M. et al. ColabFold: making protein folding accessible to all. Nat. Methods 19, 679–682 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  85. Yu Z. Q., Liu X. M., Zhao D., Xu D. D., Du L. L. Visual detection of binary, ternary and quaternary protein interactions in fission yeast using a Pil1 co-tethering assay. J. Cell Sci. 134, jcs258774 (2021).

  86. Holehouse, A. S. & Kragelund, B. B. The molecular basis for cellular function of intrinsically disordered protein regions. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 25, 187–211 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  87. Wright, P. E. & Dyson, H. J. Intrinsically disordered proteins in cellular signalling and regulation. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 16, 18–29 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  88. Xue-Franzen, Y., Holmberg, K. jaerulffS., Wright, C. & Nielsen, A. O. Genomewide identification of pheromone-targeted transcription in fission yeast. BMC Genom. 7, 303 (2006).

    Google Scholar 

  89. Dudin, O. et al. A formin-nucleated actin aster concentrates cell wall hydrolases for cell fusion in fission yeast. J. Cell Biol. 208, 897–911 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  90. Gordon, C., McGurk, G., Wallace, M. & Hastie, N. D. A conditional lethal mutant in the fission yeast 26 S protease subunit mts3+ is defective in metaphase to anaphase transition. J. Biol. Chem. 271, 5704–5711 (1996).

    Google Scholar 

  91. Rothbauer, U. et al. Targeting and tracing antigens in live cells with fluorescent nanobodies. Nat. Methods 3, 887–889 (2006).

    Google Scholar 

  92. Chen, Q., Iverson, T. M. & Gurevich, V. V. Structural basis of arrestin-dependent signal transduction. Trends Biochem. Sci. 43, 412–423 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  93. Yeung, T. et al. Membrane phosphatidylserine regulates surface charge and protein localization. Science 319, 210–213 (2008).

    Google Scholar 

  94. Grimes, J. et al. Plasma membrane preassociation drives beta-arrestin coupling to receptors and activation. Cell 186, 2238–2255 e2220 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  95. Zhang, Y. et al. Phosphatidylinositol 4-phosphate 5-kinase Its3 and calcineurin Ppb1 coordinately regulate cytokinesis in fission yeast. J. Biol. Chem. 275, 35600–35606 (2000).

    Google Scholar 

  96. Gronwald, W. et al. Solution structure of the Ras binding domain of the protein kinase Byr2 from Schizosaccharomyces pombe. Structure 9, 1029–1041 (2001).

    Google Scholar 

  97. Bauman, P., Cheng, Q. C. & Albright, C. F. The Byr2 kinase translocates to the plasma membrane in a Ras1-dependent manner. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 244, 468–474 (1998).

    Google Scholar 

  98. Fukui, Y., Kozasa, T., Kaziro, Y., Takeda, T. & Yamamoto, M. Role of a ras homolog in the life cycle of Schizosaccharomyces pombe. Cell 44, 329–336 (1986).

    Google Scholar 

  99. Nadin-Davis, S. A., Nasim, A. & Beach, D. Involvement of ras in sexual differentiation but not in growth control in fission yeast. Embo J. 5, 2963–2971 (1986).

    Google Scholar 

  100. Hughes, D. A., Fukui, Y. & Yamamoto, M. Homologous activators of Ras in fission and budding yeast. Nature 344, 355–357 (1990).

    Google Scholar 

  101. Ozoe, F. et al. The 14-3-3 proteins Rad24 and Rad25 negatively regulate Byr2 by affecting its localization in Schizosaccharomyces pombe. Mol. Cell Biol. 22, 7105–7119 (2002).

    Google Scholar 

  102. Berard, M., Merlini, L. & Martin, S. G. Proteomic and phosphoproteomic analyses reveal that TORC1 is reactivated by pheromone signaling during sexual reproduction in fission yeast. PLoS Biol. 22, e3002963 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  103. Egel, R. Physiological aspects of conjugation in fission yeast. Planta 98, 89–96 (1971).

    Google Scholar 

  104. Nussinov, R., Tsai, C. J. & Jang, H. Does Ras activate Raf and PI3K allosterically? Front. Oncol. 9, 1231 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  105. Masuda, T., Kariya, K., Shinkai, M., Okada, T. & Kataoka, T. Protein kinase Byr2 is a target of Ras1 in the fission yeast Schizosaccharomyces pombe. J. Biol. Chem. 270, 1979–1982 (1995).

    Google Scholar 

  106. Van Aelst, L., Barr, M., Marcus, S., Polverino, A. & Wigler, M. Complex formation between RAS and RAF and other protein kinases. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 90, 6213–6217 (1993).

    Google Scholar 

  107. Drogen, F. et al. Phosphorylation of the MEKK Ste11p by the PAK-like kinase Ste20p is required for MAP kinase signaling in vivo. Curr. Biol. 10, 630–639 (2000).

    Google Scholar 

  108. Yang, P., Kansra, S., Pimental, R. A., Gilbreth, M. & Marcus, S. Cloning and characterization of shk2, a gene encoding a novel p21-activated protein kinase from fission yeast. J. Biol. Chem. 273, 18481–18489 (1998).

    Google Scholar 

  109. Flatauer, L. J., Zadeh, S. F. & Bardwell, L. Mitogen-activated protein kinases with distinct requirements for Ste5 scaffolding influence signaling specificity in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol. Cell Biol. 25, 1793–1803 (2005).

    Google Scholar 

  110. Coyle, S. M., Flores, J. & Lim, W. A. Exploitation of latent allostery enables the evolution of new modes of MAP kinase regulation. Cell 154, 875–887 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  111. Locasale, J. W., Shaw, A. S. & Chakraborty, A. K. Scaffold proteins confer diverse regulatory properties to protein kinase cascades. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 104, 13307–13312 (2007).

    Google Scholar 

  112. Gallo Castro, D. & Martin, S. G. Differential GAP requirement for Cdc42-GTP polarization during proliferation and sexual reproduction. J. Cell Biol. 217, 4215–4229 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  113. Beach, D., Rodgers, L. & Gould, J. ran1+ controls the transition from mitotic division to meiosis in fission yeast. Curr. Genet. 10, 297–311 (1985).

    Google Scholar 

  114. Kitamura, K. et al. Phosphorylation of Mei2 and Ste11 by Pat1 kinase inhibits sexual differentiation via ubiquitin proteolysis and 14-3-3 protein in fission yeast. Dev. Cell 1, 389–399 (2001).

    Google Scholar 

  115. Choudhury, S., Baradaran-Mashinchi, P. & Torres, M. P. Negative feedback phosphorylation of ggamma subunit Ste18 and the Ste5 scaffold synergistically regulates MAPK activation in yeast. Cell Rep. 23, 1504–1515 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  116. Zbieralski K., Wawrzycka D. α-Arrestins and their functions: from yeast to human health. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 23, 4988 (2022).

  117. DiRusso, C. J., Dashtiahangar, M. & Gilmore, T. D. Scaffold proteins as dynamic integrators of biological processes. J. Biol. Chem. 298, 102628 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  118. Jonkers, W. et al. HAM-5 functions as a MAP kinase scaffold during cell fusion in Neurospora crassa. PLoS Genet. 10, e1004783 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  119. Dettmann, A., Heilig, Y., Valerius, O., Ludwig, S. & Seiler, S. Fungal communication requires the MAK-2 pathway elements STE-20 and RAS-2, the NRC-1 adapter STE-50 and the MAP kinase scaffold HAM-5. PLoS Genet. 10, e1004762 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  120. Shindyalov, I. N. & Bourne, P. E. Protein structure alignment by incremental combinatorial extension (CE) of the optimal path. Protein Eng. 11, 739–747 (1998).

    Google Scholar 

  121. Vjestica, A., Merlini, L., Dudin, O., Bendezu, F. O., & Martin, S. G. Microscopy of fission yeast sexual lifecycle. J. Vis. Exp. 53801 https://doi.org/10.3791/53801 (2016).

  122. Kirillov, A. et al. Segment anything. Preprint at https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2304.02643 (2023).

  123. Thevenaz, P., Ruttimann, U. E. & Unser, M. A pyramid approach to subpixel registration based on intensity. IEEE Trans. Image Process 7, 27–41 (1998).

    Google Scholar 

  124. Lee, T. C., Kashyap, R. L. & Chu, C. N. Building skeleton models via 3-D medial surface axis thinning algorithms. CVGIP: Graph. Models Image Process. 56, 462–478 (1994).

    Google Scholar 

  125. Kulak, N. A., Pichler, G., Paron, I., Nagaraj, N. & Mann, M. Minimal, encapsulated proteomic-sample processing applied to copy-number estimation in eukaryotic cells. Nat. Methods 11, 319–324 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  126. Meier, F. et al. Online parallel accumulation-serial fragmentation (PASEF) with a novel trapped ion mobility mass spectrometer. Mol. Cell Proteom. 17, 2534–2545 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  127. Cox, J. & Mann, M. MaxQuant enables high peptide identification rates, individualized p.p.b.-range mass accuracies and proteome-wide protein quantification. Nat. Biotechnol. 26, 1367–1372 (2008).

    Google Scholar 

  128. Cox, J. et al. Andromeda: a peptide search engine integrated into the MaxQuant environment. J. Proteome. Res. 10, 1794–1805 (2011).

    Google Scholar 

  129. Tyanova, S. et al. The Perseus computational platform for comprehensive analysis of (prote)omics data. Nat. Methods 13, 731–740 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  130. Schwanhausser, B. et al. Global quantification of mammalian gene expression control. Nature 473, 337–342 (2011).

    Google Scholar 

  131. Cox, J. & Mann, M. 1D and 2D annotation enrichment: a statistical method integrating quantitative proteomics with complementary high-throughput data. BMC Bioinforma. 13, S12 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank Prof Li-Lin Du (NIBS, Beijing, China) for the Pil1 plasmids, Dr Serge Pelet (UNIL, Lausanne, Switzerland) for dPSTR reagents, Dr Manfredo Quadroni (UNIL, Lausanne, Switzerland) and the UNIL Protein Analysis Facility for mass spectrometry, Dr Yoel Klug (Oxford University, UK) for the membrane extraction protocol, Prof Aleksandar Vještica (UNIL, Lausanne, Switzerland) for strains and comments on the manuscript and Prof Omaya Dudin (UNIGE, Geneva, Switzerland), Dr Fangfang Lu (Broad Institute, Cambridge, United States) and members of the Martin lab for comments on the manuscript. This work was supported by grants from the Swiss National Science Foundation (#176396 and # 191990) and the European Research Council (SexYeast) to S.G.M.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Molecular and Cellular Biology, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland

    Boris Sieber, Laura Merlini, Wanlan Li, Maëlys Besomi, Laetitia Michon, Sushila Gordon-Lennox & Sophie G. Martin

Authors
  1. Boris Sieber
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Laura Merlini
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Wanlan Li
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Maëlys Besomi
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Laetitia Michon
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Sushila Gordon-Lennox
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Sophie G. Martin
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

Conceptualisation, B.S. and S.G.M.; methodology, B.S. and L.Me.(Laura Merlini); validation, B.S., L.Me., M.B., W. Li and M.B.; software: W.L.; formal analysis, B.S., L.Me. and W.L.; investigation, B.S., L.Me. and M.B.; resources, L.Mi.(Laetitia Michon), S.G-L.; writing—original draft, B.S.; writing—review and editing, B.S., L.Me. and S.G.M.; visualisation, B.S.; supervision, S.G.M.; funding acquisition, S.G.M.; project administration, B.S. and S.G.M.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Boris Sieber or Sophie G. Martin.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Peer review

Peer review information

Nature Communications thanks the anonymous reviewers for their contribution to the peer review of this work. A peer review file is available.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Supplementary information (download PDF )

Description of Additional Supplementary Files (download PDF )

Supp Video 1 (download AVI )

Supp Video 2 (download AVI )

Reporting Summary (download PDF )

Transparent Peer Review file (download PDF )

Source data

Source data (download XLSX )

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Sieber, B., Merlini, L., Li, W. et al. Phosphoregulation of the novel hemi-arrestin MAPK scaffold Sms1 prevents untimely mating. Nat Commun (2026). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-026-70631-9

Download citation

  • Received: 09 November 2025

  • Accepted: 25 February 2026

  • Published: 17 March 2026

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-026-70631-9

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

Download PDF

Advertisement

Explore content

  • Research articles
  • Reviews & Analysis
  • News & Comment
  • Videos
  • Collections
  • Subjects
  • Follow us on Facebook
  • Follow us on X
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed

About the journal

  • Aims & Scope
  • Editors
  • Journal Information
  • Open Access Fees and Funding
  • Calls for Papers
  • Editorial Values Statement
  • Journal Metrics
  • Editors' Highlights
  • Contact
  • Editorial policies
  • Top Articles

Publish with us

  • For authors
  • For Reviewers
  • Language editing services
  • Open access funding
  • Submit manuscript

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

  • Explore articles by subject
  • Find a job
  • Guide to authors
  • Editorial policies

Nature Communications (Nat Commun)

ISSN 2041-1723 (online)

nature.com footer links

About Nature Portfolio

  • About us
  • Press releases
  • Press office
  • Contact us

Discover content

  • Journals A-Z
  • Articles by subject
  • protocols.io
  • Nature Index

Publishing policies

  • Nature portfolio policies
  • Open access

Author & Researcher services

  • Reprints & permissions
  • Research data
  • Language editing
  • Scientific editing
  • Nature Masterclasses
  • Research Solutions

Libraries & institutions

  • Librarian service & tools
  • Librarian portal
  • Open research
  • Recommend to library

Advertising & partnerships

  • Advertising
  • Partnerships & Services
  • Media kits
  • Branded content

Professional development

  • Nature Awards
  • Nature Careers
  • Nature Conferences

Regional websites

  • Nature Africa
  • Nature China
  • Nature India
  • Nature Japan
  • Nature Middle East
  • Privacy Policy
  • Use of cookies
  • Legal notice
  • Accessibility statement
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Your US state privacy rights
Springer Nature

© 2026 Springer Nature Limited

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing