Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Advertisement

Nature Communications
  • View all journals
  • Search
  • My Account Login
  • Content Explore content
  • About the journal
  • Publish with us
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed
  1. nature
  2. nature communications
  3. articles
  4. article
A single viral enzyme drives tRNA-dependent hypermodification of DNA at adenine
Download PDF
Download PDF
  • Article
  • Open access
  • Published: 03 April 2026

A single viral enzyme drives tRNA-dependent hypermodification of DNA at adenine

  • Rebekah M. B. Silva1 na1,
  • Anton Slyvka2 na1,
  • Yan-Jiun Lee1,
  • Chudi Guan1,
  • Sean R. Lund1,
  • Elisabeth A. Raleigh  ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0003-0745-99251,
  • Krzysztof Skowronek  ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0001-9973-70852,
  • Michael S. Kuska1,
  • Matthias Bochtler  ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0001-7884-44632,3 &
  • …
  • Peter R. Weigele  ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0003-3696-45411 

Nature Communications , Article number:  (2026) Cite this article

We are providing an unedited version of this manuscript to give early access to its findings. Before final publication, the manuscript will undergo further editing. Please note there may be errors present which affect the content, and all legal disclaimers apply.

Subjects

  • Bacteriophages
  • DNA
  • Enzyme mechanisms
  • X-ray crystallography

Abstract

Nucleic acid modifying enzymes drive diverse defense and counter-defense measures in the evolutionary arms race between viruses and their cellular hosts. Abundant and widespread bacterial viruses (bacteriophage or phage) encode for biosynthetic pathways that install elaborate DNA hypermodifications which protect their genomic DNA from host endonucleases. Here, we establish the molecular basis for the multistep biosynthesis of 6-aminocarboxymethyl-2ʹ-deoxyadenosine (6-NcmdA), a nucleobase hypermodification found in the virion DNA of bacteriophage Mu that leads to restriction evasion in the context of phage-host conflicts. In the first step, we show that Mu-encoded Mom enzyme catalyzes the formation of 6-NcmdA by transferring glycine from charged tRNAGly to the N6 position of adenine within double-stranded DNA. We uncover a second step where the glycyl-dA intermediate undergoes an on-base rearrangement to form 6-NcmdA. Examination of the proposed reaction pathways by quantum chemical calculations confirms the instability of acyl exocyclic groups at N6-adenine and reveals an energetically favorable orientation of 6-NcmdA that restores canonical base pairing. An X-ray structure confirms Mom is a member of the GNAT superfamily and suggests binding sites for both tRNA and DNA. Guided by the Mom structure and patterns of sequence conservation across metagenomic space, we show residues R111 and S124 are essential for catalysis. This work demonstrates that the Mom enzyme defines a new category of acetyltransferases utilizing charged tRNA to modify DNA.

Data availability

The final model of the structure solved in this work was deposited in the Protein Data Bank under accession code 8BV8. ORCA output files for all energy minimizations of educts, products, and the spirocyclic intermediate, as well as ORCA output files for the saddle points/transition states, and the corresponding PDB files (translated from the ORCA files using Avogadro) are made available in a Zip drive. A sequencing read archive (SRA) containing BAM files produced by the PacBio SMRT sequencing platform and extended to include kinetic data for the modification motif analysis in this work can be obtained at NCBI Bioproject PRJNA1406289. Metagenome information for Mom Homolog A can be found at https://img.jgi.doe.gov/cgi-bin/m/main.cgi?section=TaxonDetail&page=taxonDetail&taxon_oid=3300002484. Metagenome information for Mom Homolog B can be found at https://img.jgi.doe.gov/cgi-bin/m/main.cgi?section=TaxonDetail&page=taxonDetail&taxon_oid=2872672955. All other data supporting the findings of this work are available within the Article, Supplementary Information, or from the corresponding author(s) upon request. Source data are provided with this paper.

References

  1. Isaev, A. B., Musharova, O. S. & Severinov, K. V. Microbial arsenal of antiviral defenses—part I. Biochemistry. 86, 319–337 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Isaev, A. B., Musharova, O. S. & Severinov, K. V. Microbial arsenal of antiviral defenses. Part II. Biochemistry. 86, 449–470 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Hall, R. H. N6-(δ2-Isopentenyl)adenosine: chemical reactions, biosynthesis, metabolism, and significance to the structure and function of †RNA. Prog. Nucleic Acid Res. 10, 57–86 (1970).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Warren, R. A. J. Modified bases in bacteriophage DNAs. Annu. Rev. Microbiol. 34, 137–158 (1980).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Gommers-Ampt, J. H. & Borst, P. Hypermodified bases in DNA. FASEB J. 9, 1034–1042 (1995).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Weigele, P. & Raleigh, E. A. Biosynthesis and function of modified bases in bacteria and their viruses. Chem. Rev. 116, 12655–12687 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Parker, M. J., Lee, Y.-J., Weigele, P. R. & Saleh, L. 5-Methylpyrimidines and their modifications in DNA. In Comprehensive Natural Products III 465–488 (Elsevier, 2020).

  8. Hutinet, G., Lee, Y.-J., de Crécy-Lagard, V. & Weigele, P. R. Hypermodified DNA in viruses of E. coli and Salmonella. EcoSal Plus. 9, eESP-0028-2019 (2021).

  9. Flodman, K. et al. Type II restriction of bacteriophage DNA with 5hmdU-derived base modifications. Front. Microbiol. 10, 584 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Flodman, K., Corrêa, I. R., Dai, N., Weigele, P. & Xu, S. In vitro type II restriction of bacteriophage DNA with modified pyrimidines. Front. Microbiol. 11, 604618 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Hall, R. H. The Modified Nucleosides in Nucleic Acids. (Columbia University Press, 1971).

  12. Galburt, E. A., Pelletier, J., Wilson, G. & Stoddard, B. L. Structure of a tRNA repair enzyme and molecular biology workhorse T4 polynucleotide kinase. Structure. 10, 1249–1260 (2002).

    Google Scholar 

  13. Shuman, S. DNA ligases: progress and prospects*. J. Biol. Chem. 284, 17365–17369 (2009).

    Google Scholar 

  14. Doudna, J. A. & Charpentier, E. The new frontier of genome engineering with CRISPR-Cas9. Science. 346, 1258096 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  15. Symonds, N., Toussaint, A., Van de Putte, P. & Howe, M. M. Phage Mu (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, NY, 1988).

  16. Allet, B. & Bukhari, A. I. Analysis of bacteriophage Mu and λ-Mu hybrid DNAs by specific endonucleases. J. Mol. Biol. 92, 529–540 (1975).

    Google Scholar 

  17. Toussaint, A. The DNA modification function of temperate phage Mu-1. Virology 70, 17–27 (1976).

    Google Scholar 

  18. Hattman, S. Unusual modification of bacteriophage Mu DNA. J. Virol. 32, 468–475 (1979).

    Google Scholar 

  19. Khatoon, H. & Bukhari, A. I. Bacteriophage Mu-induced modification of DNA is dependent upon a host function. J. Bacteriol. 136, 423–428 (1978).

    Google Scholar 

  20. Hattman, S. Specificity of the bacteriophage Mu mom+ -controlled DNA modification. J. Virol. 34, 277–279 (1980).

    Google Scholar 

  21. Swinton, D. et al. Purification and characterization of the unusual deoxynucleoside, a-N-(9-fi-D-2’-deoxyribofuranosylpurin-6-yl)glycinamide, specified. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 80, 7400–7404 (1983).

  22. Toussaint, A. My life with Mu. Bacteriophage. 5, e1034336 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  23. Karambelkar, S. et al. Emergence of a novel immune-evasion strategy from an ancestral protein fold in bacteriophage Mu. Nucleic Acids Res. 48, 5294–5305 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  24. Newton, R. P., Kingston, E. E. & Overton, A. Identification of novel nucleotides found in the red seaweed Porphyra umbilicalis. Rapid Commun. Mass Spectrom. 9, 305–311 (1995).

    Google Scholar 

  25. Strzelecka, D., Chmielinski, S., Bednarek, S., Jemielity, J. & Kowalska, J. Analysis of mononucleotides by tandem mass spectrometry: investigation of fragmentation pathways for phosphate- and ribose-modified nucleotide analogues. Sci. Rep. 7, 8931 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  26. Kahmann, R., Seiler, A., Wulczyn, F. G. & Pfaff, E. The mom gene of bacteriophage Mu: a unique regulatory scheme to control a lethal function. Gene. 39, 61–70 (1985).

    Google Scholar 

  27. Krüger, D. H. & Bickle, T. A. Bacteriophage survival: multiple mechanisms for avoiding the deoxyribonucleic acid restriction systems of their hosts. Microbiol. Rev. 47, 345–360 (1983).

    Google Scholar 

  28. Kaminska, K. H. & Bujnicki, J. M. Bacteriophage Mu Mom protein responsible for DNA modification is a new member of the acyltransferase superfamily. Cell Cycle. 7, 120–121 (2008).

    Google Scholar 

  29. Iyer, L. M., Tahiliani, M., Rao, A. & Aravind, L. Prediction of novel families of enzymes involved in oxidative and other complex modifications of bases in nucleic acids. Cell Cycle. 8, 1698–1710 (2009).

    Google Scholar 

  30. Iyer, L. M., Zhang, D. & Aravind, L. Adenine methylation in eukaryotes: apprehending the complex evolutionary history and functional potential of an epigenetic modification. Bioessays. 38, 27–40 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  31. Iyer, L. M., Anantharaman, V., Krishnan, A., Burroughs, A. M. & Aravind, L. Jumbo phages: a comparative genomic overview of core functions and adaptions for biological conflicts. Viruses. 13, 63 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  32. Lee, Y.-J. et al. Identification and biosynthesis of thymidine hypermodifications in the genomic DNA of widespread bacterial viruses. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 115, E3116–E3125 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  33. Lee, Y.-J. et al. Pathways of thymidine hypermodification. Nucleic Acids Res. 50, 3001–3017 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  34. Shimizu, Y. & Ueda, T. Cell-free protein production, methods and protocols. Methods Mol. Biol. 607, 11–21 (2009).

    Google Scholar 

  35. Tuckey, C., Asahara, H., Zhou, Y. & Chong, S. Protein synthesis using a reconstituted cell-free system. Curr. Protoc. Mol. Biol. 108, 16.31.1–16.31.22 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  36. Burckhardt, R. M. & Escalante-Semerena, J. C. Small-molecule acetylation by GCN5-related N-acetyltransferases in bacteria. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. R 84, https://doi.org/10.1128/mmbr.00090-19 (2020).

  37. Favrot, L., Blanchard, J. S. & Vergnolle, O. Bacterial GCN5-related N-acetyltransferases: from resistance to regulation. Biochemistry. 55, 989–1002 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  38. Baumgartner, J. T. et al. Gcn5-related N-acetyltransferases (GNATs) with a catalytic serine residue can play ping-pong too. Front. Mol. Biosci. 8, 646046 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  39. Ostrem, D. L. & Berg, P. Glycyl transfer ribonucleic acid synthetase from Escherichia coli: purification, properties, and substrate binding. Biochemistry 13, 1338–1348 (1974).

    Google Scholar 

  40. Toth, M. J. & Schimmel, P. Deletions in the large (beta) subunit of a hetero-oligomeric aminoacyl-tRNA synthetase. J. Biol. Chem. 265, 1000–1004 (1990).

    Google Scholar 

  41. Valencia-Sánchez, M. I. et al. Structural insights into the polyphyletic origins of glycyl tRNA synthetases. J. Biol. Chem. 291, 14430–14446 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  42. Gomez, M. A. R. & Ibba, M. Aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases. RNA 26, rna.071720.119 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  43. Ju, Y. et al. X-shaped structure of bacterial heterotetrameric tRNA synthetase suggests cryptic prokaryote functions and a rationale for synthetase classifications. Nucleic Acids Res. 49, 10106–10119 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  44. Grünberg, S. et al. Enhanced expression and purification of nucleotide-specific ribonucleases MC1 and Cusativin. Protein Expr. Purif. 190, 105987 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  45. Wolf, E. J. et al. Human RNase 4 improves mRNA sequence characterization by LC–MS/MS. Nucleic Acids Res. 50, e106–e106 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  46. Wolf, E. J., Dai, N., Chan, S.-H. & Corrêa, I. R. Selective characterization of mRNA 5′ end-capping by DNA probe-directed enrichment with site-specific endoribonucleases. ACS Pharmacol. Transl. Sci. 6, 1692–1702 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  47. Sprinzl, M. & Cramer, F. Site of aminoacylation of tRNAs from Escherichia coli with respect to the 2’- or 3’-hydroxyl group of the terminal adenosine. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 72, 3049–3053 (1975).

    Google Scholar 

  48. Asahara, H. & Uhlenbeck, O. C. The tRNA specificity of thermus thermophilus EF-Tu. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 99, 3499–3504 (2002).

    Google Scholar 

  49. Walker, S. E. & Fredrick, K. Preparation and evaluation of acylated tRNAs. Methods. 44, 81–86 (2008).

    Google Scholar 

  50. Gamper, H. & Hou, Y.-M. A label-free assay for aminoacylation of tRNA. Genes 11, 1173 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  51. Xu, X. et al. MenT nucleotidyltransferase toxins extend tRNA acceptor stems and can be inhibited by asymmetrical antitoxin binding. Nat. Commun. 14, 4644 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  52. Chan, P. P. & Lowe, T. M. GtRNAdb: a database of transfer RNA genes detected in genomic sequence. Nucleic Acids Res. 37, D93–D97 (2009).

    Google Scholar 

  53. Chan, P. P. & Lowe, T. M. GtRNAdb 2.0: an expanded database of transfer RNA genes identified in complete and draft genomes. Nucleic Acids Res. 44, D184–D189 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  54. Leiva, L. E. et al. Modulation of Escherichia coli translation by the specific inactivation of tRNAGly under oxidative stress. Front. Genet. 11, 856 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  55. Stewart, T. S., Roberts, R. J. & Strominger, J. L. Novel species of tRNA. Nature. 230, 36–38 (1971).

    Google Scholar 

  56. Roberts, R. J. Structures of two glycyl-tRNAs from Staphylococcus epidermidis. Nat. N. Biol. 237, 44–45 (1972).

    Google Scholar 

  57. Beebe, K., de Pouplana, L. R. & Schimmel, P. Elucidation of tRNA-dependent editing by a class II tRNA synthetase and significance for cell viability. EMBO J. 22, 668–675 (2003).

    Google Scholar 

  58. Pasman, Z. et al. Substrate specificity and catalysis by the editing active site of alanyl-tRNA synthetase from Escherichia coli. Biochemistry. 50, 1474–1482 (2011).

    Google Scholar 

  59. Kavoor, A., Kelly, P. & Ibba, M. Escherichia coli alanyl-tRNA synthetase maintains proofreading activity and translational accuracy under oxidative stress. J. Biol. Chem. 298, 101601 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  60. Fonvielle, M. et al. Aminoacyl-tRNA recognition by the FemX Wv transferase for bacterial cell wall synthesis. Nucleic Acids Res. 37, 1589–1601 (2009).

    Google Scholar 

  61. Villet, R. et al. Idiosyncratic features in tRNAs participating in bacterial cell wall synthesis. Nucleic Acids Res. 35, 6870–6883 (2007).

    Google Scholar 

  62. Bikmetov, D. et al. GNAT toxins evolve toward narrow tRNA target specificities. Nucleic Acids Res. 50, 5807–5817 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  63. Vetting, M. W. et al. Structure and functions of the GNAT superfamily of acetyltransferases. Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 433, 212–226 (2005).

    Google Scholar 

  64. Ud-Din, A. I. M. S., Tikhomirova, A. & Roujeinikova, A. Structure and functional diversity of GCN5-related N-acetyltransferases (GNAT). Int. J. Mol. Sci. 17, 1018 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  65. Bochtler, M. & Fernandes, H. DNA adenine methylation in eukaryotes: enzymatic mark or a form of DNA damage? Bioessays 43, 2000243 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  66. Fu, D., Calvo, J. A. & Samson, L. D. Balancing repair and tolerance of DNA damage caused by alkylating agents. Nat. Rev. Cancer. 12, 104–120 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  67. Xu, G.-L. & Bochtler, M. Reversal of nucleobase methylation by dioxygenases. Nat. Chem. Biol. 16, 1160–1169 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  68. Macon, J. B. & Wolfenden, R. 1-Methyladenosine. Dimroth rearrangement and reversible reduction. Biochemistry. 7, 3453–3458 (1968).

    Google Scholar 

  69. Ashry, E. S. H. E., Nadeem, S., Shah, M. R. & Kilany, Y. E. Chapter 5- Recent advances in the Dimroth rearrangement: a valuable tool for the synthesis of heterocycles. Advances in Heterocyclic Chemistry 101, 161–228 (Academic Press, 2010).

  70. Neese, F., Wennmohs, F., Becker, U. & Riplinger, C. The ORCA quantum chemistry program package. J. Chem. Phys. 152, 224108 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  71. McCoy, A. J. et al. Phaser crystallographic software. J. Appl. Crystallogr. 40, 658–674 (2007).

    Google Scholar 

  72. Emsley, P., Lohkamp, B., Scott, W. G. & Cowtan, K. Features and development of Coot. Acta Crystallogr. Sect. D. 66, 486–501 (2010).

    Google Scholar 

  73. Jumper, J. et al. Highly accurate protein structure prediction with AlphaFold. Nature. 596, 583–589 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  74. Holm, L. Dali server: structural unification of protein families. Nucleic Acids Res. 50, W210–W215 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  75. Laskowski, R. A., Jabłońska, J., Pravda, L., Vařeková, R. S. & Thornton, J. M. PDBsum: structural summaries of PDB entries. Protein Sci. Publ. Protein Soc. 27, 129–134 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  76. Cheverton, A. M. et al. A Salmonella toxin promotes persister formation through acetylation of tRNA. Mol. Cell. 63, 86–96 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  77. Krissinel, E. & Henrick, K. Inference of macromolecular assemblies from crystalline state. J. Mol. Biol. 372, 774–797 (2007).

    Google Scholar 

  78. Abramson, J. et al. Accurate structure prediction of biomolecular interactions with AlphaFold 3. Nature 630, 493–500 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  79. Yashiro, Y., Zhang, C., Sakaguchi, Y., Suzuki, T. & Tomita, K. Molecular basis of glycyl-tRNAGly acetylation by TacT from Salmonella typhimurium. Cell Rep. 37, 110130 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  80. Hall, R. H. Isolation of N 6 -(Aminoacyl)adenosine from Yeast Ribonucleic Acid. Biochemistry 3, 769–773 (1964).

    Google Scholar 

  81. Chheda, G. B. & Hall, R. H. Aminoacyl nucleosides. III. A novel rearangement: conversion of N6-(α-Aminoacyl) adenines into N-(6-Purinyl)amino Acids. Biochemistry. 5, 2082–2091 (1966).

  82. Chheda, G. B., Hall, R. H. & Tanna, P. M. Aminoacyl nucleosides. V. Mechanism of the rearrangement of N6-(α-aminoacyl)adenines into N-(6-purinyl)amino acids. J. Org. Chem. 34, 3498–3502 (1969).

  83. Masurier, N. et al. Synthesis of peptide-adenine conjugates as a new tool for monitoring protease activity. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2019, 176–183 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  84. Lindahl, T. Instability and decay of the primary structure of DNA. Nature 362, 709–715 (1993).

    Google Scholar 

  85. Moutiez, M., Belin, P. & Gondry, M. Aminoacyl-tRNA-utilizing enzymes in natural product biosynthesis. Chem. Rev. 117, 5578–5618 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  86. Hattman, S. Unusual transcriptional and translational regulation of the bacteriophage Mu mom operon. Pharmacol. Ther. 84, 367–388 (1999).

    Google Scholar 

  87. Chimnaronk, S. et al. RNA helicase module in an acetyltransferase that modifies a specific tRNA anticodon. EMBO J. 28, 1362–1373 (2009).

    Google Scholar 

  88. Huang, B., Johansson, M. J. O. & Byström, A. S. An early step in wobble uridine tRNA modification requires the Elongator complex. RNA. 11, 424–436 (2005).

    Google Scholar 

  89. Dauden, M. I. et al. Architecture of the yeast Elongator complex. EMBO Rep. 18, 264–279 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  90. Lee, Y.-J. & Weigele, P. R. Detection of modified bases in bacteriophage genomic DNA. Methods Mol. Biol. 2198, 53–66 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  91. Li, D., Liu, C.-M., Luo, R., Sadakane, K. & Lam, T.-W. MEGAHIT: an ultra-fast single-node solution for large and complex metagenomics assembly via succinct de Bruijn graph. Bioinformatics 31, 1674–1676 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  92. Parker, M. J., Weigele, P. R. & Saleh, L. Insights into the biochemistry, evolution, and biotechnological applications of the ten-eleven translocation (TET) enzymes. Biochemistry. 58, 450–467 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  93. Burke, E. J. et al. Phage-encoded ten-eleven translocation dioxygenase (TET) is active in C5-cytosine hypermodification in DNA. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 118, e2026742118 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  94. Cavaluzzi, M. J. & Borer, P. N. Revised UV extinction coefficients for nucleoside-5′-monophosphates and unpaired DNA and RNA. Nucleic Acids Res. 32, e13–e13 (2004).

    Google Scholar 

  95. Dunn, D. B. & Hall, R. H. Handbook of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology 269–358 (C.R.C. Press, 2010).

  96. Francois, C. J. L., Jang, Y. H., Cagin, T., Goddard, W. A. & Sowers, L. C. Conformation and proton configuration of pyrimidine deoxynucleoside oxidation damage products in water. Chem. Res Toxicol. 13, 462–470 (2000).

    Google Scholar 

  97. Milo, R., Jorgensen, P., Moran, U., Weber, G. & Springer, M. BioNumbers—the database of key numbers in molecular and cell biology. Nucleic Acids Res. 38, D750–D753 (2010).

    Google Scholar 

  98. Tanner, N., Ong, J., Slayton, E., Maduzia, L. L. & Russello, S. V. RNase inhibitors. US Patent App. 18/509,899, 2024 USPTO US20240150770A1 (2024).

  99. Edwards, A. L., Garst, A. D. & Batey, R. T. Determining structures of RNA aptamers and riboswitches by X-ray crystallography. Methods Mol. Biol. 535, 135–163 (2009).

    Google Scholar 

  100. Quinlivan, E. P. & Gregory, J. F. DNA digestion to deoxyribonucleoside: a simplified one-step procedure. Anal. Biochem. 373, 383–385 (2008).

    Google Scholar 

  101. Sprinzl, M., Sternbach, H., Haar, F. V. D. & Cramer, F. Enzymatic Incorporation of ATP and CTP analogues into the 3′ End of tRNA. Eur. J. Biochem. 81, 579–589 (1977).

    Google Scholar 

  102. Katoh, T. & Suga, H. Flexizyme-catalyzed synthesis of 3′-aminoacyl-NH-tRNAs. Nucleic Acids Res. 47, e54 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  103. Kent, A. D. et al. Thioesters support efficient protein biosynthesis by the ribosome. ACS Cent. Sci. 11, 404–412 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  104. Krug, M., Weiss, M. S., Heinemann, U. & Mueller, U. XDSAPP: a graphical user interface for the convenient processing of diffraction data using XDS. J. Appl. Crystallogr. 45, 568–572 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  105. Liebschner, D. et al. Macromolecular structure determination using X-rays, neutrons and electrons: recent developments in Phenix. Acta Crystallogr. Sect. D 75, 861–877 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  106. Pettersen, E. F. et al. UCSF ChimeraX: structure visualization for researchers, educators, and developers. Protein Sci. 30, 70–82 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  107. Gibrat, J.-F., Madej, T. & Bryant, S. H. Surprising similarities in structure comparison. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 6, 377–385 (1996).

    Google Scholar 

  108. Eddy, S. R. Accelerated profile HMM searches. PLoS Comput. Biol. 7, e1002195 (2011).

    Google Scholar 

  109. Paez-Espino, D. et al. IMG/VR v.2.0: an integrated data management and analysis system for cultivated and environmental viral genomes. Nucleic Acids Res. 47, D678–D686 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  110. Gregory, A. C. et al. Marine DNA viral macro- and microdiversity from pole to pole. Cell. 177, 1109–1123.e14 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  111. Seemann, T. Prokka: rapid prokaryotic genome annotation. Bioinformatics 30, 2068–2069 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  112. Arkin, A. P. et al. KBase: the United States Department of Energy Systems Biology Knowledgebase. Nat. Biotechnol. 36, 566–569 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  113. El-Gebali, S. et al. The Pfam protein families database in 2019. Nucleic Acids Res. 47, D427–D432 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  114. Gerlt, J. A. et al. Enzyme Function Initiative-Enzyme Similarity Tool (EFI-EST): a web tool for generating protein sequence similarity networks. Biochim. Biophys. Acta Proteins Proteom. 1854, 1019–1037 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  115. O’Toole, K. H., Imperiali, B. & Allen, K. N. Glycoconjugate pathway connections revealed by sequence similarity network analysis of the monotopic phosphoglycosyl transferases. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 118, e2018289118 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  116. Shannon, P. et al. Cytoscape: a software environment for integrated models of biomolecular interaction networks. Genome Res. 13, 2498–2504 (2003).

    Google Scholar 

  117. Mirdita, M. et al. ColabFold: making protein folding accessible to all. Nat. Methods 19, 679–682 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  118. LLC, S. & DeLano, W. PyMOL (2020).

  119. Francklyn, C. S. & Minajigi, A. tRNA as an active chemical scaffold for diverse chemical transformations. FEBS Lett. 584, 366–375 (2010).

    Google Scholar 

  120. Ulrich, E. C. & Donk, W. A. van der. Cameo appearances of aminoacyl-tRNA in natural product biosynthesis. Curr. Opin. Chem. Biol. 35, 29–36 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  121. Su, Z., Wilson, B., Kumar, P. & Dutta, A. Noncanonical roles of tRNAs: tRNA fragments and beyond. Annu. Rev. Genet. 54, 1–23 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  122. Maruyama, C. & Hamano, Y. tRNA-dependent amide bond–forming enzymes in peptide natural product biosynthesis. Curr. Opin. Chem. Biol. 59, 164–171 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  123. Hentchel, K. L. & Escalante-Semerena, J. C. Acylation of biomolecules in prokaryotes: a widespread strategy for the control of biological function and metabolic stress. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. R. 79, 321–346 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  124. Yashiro, Y., Sakaguchi, Y., Suzuki, T. & Tomita, K. Mechanism of aminoacyl-tRNA acetylation by an aminoacyl-tRNA acetyltransferase AtaT from enterohemorrhagic E. coli. Nat. Commun. 11, 5438 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  125. Skiba, M. A. et al. Repurposing the GNAT fold in the initiation of polyketide biosynthesis. Structure. 28, 63–74.e4 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank Johanna Hakanpää and Guillaume Pompidor for access to the PETRA III P11 beamline at DESY, and Dr. Honorata Czapińska, Dr. Elzbieta Nowak, and Michal Pastor for data collection. We gratefully acknowledge Poland's high-performance Infrastructure PLGrid [ACK Cyfronet AGH] for providing computer facilities and support within computational grant no [plgmomylation and plgmomylation2]. Core facility support at IIMCB was aided by IN-MOL-CELL Infrastructure (RRID:SCR_021630) funded by the EU NextGenerationEU under National Recovery and Resilience Plan Horizon Europe (Project 101059801 - RACE) and European Funds for Smart Economy 2021-2027 (FENG) RACE-PRIME project within the International Research Agenda Program Fundacja na rzecz Nauki Polskiej (Foundation for Polish Science) program. The authors are grateful for purified WT GlyRS and WT AlaRS from Corinna Tuckey, Dr. Ying Zhou, Dr. Bradley J. Landgraf, and Dr. Emily Chen, T7 RNA polymerase from Professor Janusz Bujnicki’s lab, a plasmid encoding tRNAGly/GCC from Dr. Haruichi Asahara, and plasmid pRY from Dr. Robert M. Yarrington. We thank Dr. Nan Dai, Dr. Eric J. Wolf, Dr. Edwin E. Escobar, and the Protein Research Mass Spec Facility at NEB for their expertise using intact mass spectrometry to characterize tRNA. We also thank Dr. Andrew P. Sikkema for sharing his methods and expertise regarding WT CCA2, as well as Dr. Esta Tamanaha and James Elliot for sharing immobilized aptamers during purification of CCA2. Critical readings of our manuscript were provided by Dr. Ivan R. Corrêa Jr., Dr. Richard J. Roberts, Dr. Timothy R. Blower, Dr. Gregory J. S. Lohman, and colleagues at NEB/IIMCB. Tashe José provided key feedback on scientific illustrations. We are thankful to Dr. Shweta Karambelkar for sharing her unpublished thesis from the Indian Institute of Science, Bangalore. R.M.B.S., Y.J.L., C.G., E.A.S., S.R.L., and P.R.W. are grateful for the generous support from the Comb Family and New England Biolabs, Inc. without whom this work would not have been possible. M.B. and A.S. are grateful for funding from the Polish National Science Centre (NCN, 2018/30/Q/NZ2/00669) and the Foundation for Polish Science (FNP, POIR.04.04.00-00-5D81/17-00 to M.B. and START 79.2020 to A.S.). Some figures were made using BioRender. We dedicate this work to the memory of Professor Stanley Hattman.

Author information

Author notes
  1. These authors contributed equally: Rebekah M. B. Silva, Anton Slyvka.

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Research Department, New England Biolabs, Inc., Ipswich, MA, USA

    Rebekah M. B. Silva, Yan-Jiun Lee, Chudi Guan, Sean R. Lund, Elisabeth A. Raleigh, Michael S. Kuska & Peter R. Weigele

  2. International Institute of Molecular and Cell Biology in Warsaw, Warsaw, Poland

    Anton Slyvka, Krzysztof Skowronek & Matthias Bochtler

  3. Institute of Biochemistry and Biophysics, Polish Academy of Sciences, Warsaw, Poland

    Matthias Bochtler

Authors
  1. Rebekah M. B. Silva
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Anton Slyvka
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Yan-Jiun Lee
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Chudi Guan
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Sean R. Lund
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Elisabeth A. Raleigh
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Krzysztof Skowronek
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Michael S. Kuska
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Matthias Bochtler
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  10. Peter R. Weigele
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

P.R.W. and M.B. conceptualized the project. R.M.B.S., A.S., and Y.J.L. developed the methodologies used in this study. R.M.B.S., A.S., Y.J.L., C.G., S.R.L., E.A.R., K.S., M.S.K., M.B., and P.R.W. conducted experiments and completed data analysis. R.M.B.S. and A.S. administered the project and managed data visualization. M.B. and P.R.W. supervised the project and secured funding. R.M.B.S., P.R.W., Y.-J.L., A.S., and M.B. wrote the manuscript with support from all the other authors.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Matthias Bochtler or Peter R. Weigele.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

R.M.B.S., Y.-J.L., C.G., E.A.S., S.R.L., M.S.K., and P.R.W. are employees of New England Biolabs, a manufacturer and vendor of molecular biology reagents. This affiliation does not affect the authors’ impartiality, adherence to journal standards and policies, or availability of data. The remaining authors declare no competing interests.

Peer review

Peer review information

Nature Communications thanks anonymous reviewers for their contribution to the peer review of this work. A peer review file is available.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Information (download PDF )

Reporting Summary (download PDF )

Transparent Peer Review file (download PDF )

Source data

Source Data (download XLSX )

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if you modified the licensed material. You do not have permission under this licence to share adapted material derived from this article or parts of it. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Silva, R.M.B., Slyvka, A., Lee, YJ. et al. A single viral enzyme drives tRNA-dependent hypermodification of DNA at adenine. Nat Commun (2026). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-026-70671-1

Download citation

  • Received: 11 August 2023

  • Accepted: 03 March 2026

  • Published: 03 April 2026

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-026-70671-1

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

Download PDF

Advertisement

Explore content

  • Research articles
  • Reviews & Analysis
  • News & Comment
  • Videos
  • Collections
  • Subjects
  • Follow us on Facebook
  • Follow us on X
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed

About the journal

  • Aims & Scope
  • Editors
  • Journal Information
  • Open Access Fees and Funding
  • Calls for Papers
  • Editorial Values Statement
  • Journal Metrics
  • Editors' Highlights
  • Contact
  • Editorial policies
  • Top Articles

Publish with us

  • For authors
  • For Reviewers
  • Language editing services
  • Open access funding
  • Submit manuscript

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

  • Explore articles by subject
  • Find a job
  • Guide to authors
  • Editorial policies

Nature Communications (Nat Commun)

ISSN 2041-1723 (online)

nature.com footer links

About Nature Portfolio

  • About us
  • Press releases
  • Press office
  • Contact us

Discover content

  • Journals A-Z
  • Articles by subject
  • protocols.io
  • Nature Index

Publishing policies

  • Nature portfolio policies
  • Open access

Author & Researcher services

  • Reprints & permissions
  • Research data
  • Language editing
  • Scientific editing
  • Nature Masterclasses
  • Research Solutions

Libraries & institutions

  • Librarian service & tools
  • Librarian portal
  • Open research
  • Recommend to library

Advertising & partnerships

  • Advertising
  • Partnerships & Services
  • Media kits
  • Branded content

Professional development

  • Nature Awards
  • Nature Careers
  • Nature Conferences

Regional websites

  • Nature Africa
  • Nature China
  • Nature India
  • Nature Japan
  • Nature Middle East
  • Privacy Policy
  • Use of cookies
  • Legal notice
  • Accessibility statement
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Your US state privacy rights
Springer Nature

© 2026 Springer Nature Limited

Nature Briefing Microbiology

Sign up for the Nature Briefing: Microbiology newsletter — what matters in microbiology research, free to your inbox weekly.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing: Microbiology