Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Advertisement

Nature Communications
  • View all journals
  • Search
  • My Account Login
  • Content Explore content
  • About the journal
  • Publish with us
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed
  1. nature
  2. nature communications
  3. articles
  4. article
Oligomerization-competent PIF4 drives thermomorphogenesis through functional redundancy in transactivation and DNA binding
Download PDF
Download PDF
  • Article
  • Open access
  • Published: 17 March 2026

Oligomerization-competent PIF4 drives thermomorphogenesis through functional redundancy in transactivation and DNA binding

  • Haibo Xiong  ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0002-8787-98091 na1,
  • Abhishesh Bajracharya  ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0002-3114-25331 na1,
  • Ranjeeta Odari  ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0002-8551-67991,
  • Eden E. Bayer  ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0003-3621-40971,
  • Alyssa Stoner  ORCID: orcid.org/0009-0000-4228-306X1,
  • Anupa Wasti  ORCID: orcid.org/0009-0009-8485-65541,
  • Jing Xi  ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0003-0881-23562,3,
  • Scott R. Baerson2,
  • Meng Chen  ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0003-0351-58974 &
  • …
  • Yongjian Qiu  ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0002-1799-63051 

Nature Communications , Article number:  (2026) Cite this article

  • 3233 Accesses

  • 2 Altmetric

  • Metrics details

We are providing an unedited version of this manuscript to give early access to its findings. Before final publication, the manuscript will undergo further editing. Please note there may be errors present which affect the content, and all legal disclaimers apply.

Subjects

  • Plant molecular biology
  • Plant morphogenesis
  • Plant signalling
  • Transcription

Abstract

Plants tailor their architecture to warm temperatures through the central transcription factor PHYTOCHROME-INTERACTING FACTOR 4 (PIF4). Here, we dissect how structured and disordered regions of PIF4 contribute to its function in thermomorphogenesis. A long N-terminal intrinsically disordered region (IDR) enables PIF4 to form low-mobility condensates. Within this IDR, we identify an acidic transactivation domain (TAD) and an extended basic segment that carries a nuclear-localization signal and the canonical basic motif of the basic helix-loop-helix (bHLH) domain. The basic segment is both necessary and sufficient to drive PIF4 condensate formation, while the TAD tunes condensate properties. Strikingly, alanine substitutions that abolish TAD-mediated transactivation, disrupt DNA binding, or greatly reduce phase-separation propensity have no significant effect on thermomorphogenetic hypocotyl elongation. By contrast, substituting twelve basic residues within the basic segment, which disrupts both DNA binding and HLH-mediated oligomerization, abolishes thermo-induced hypocotyl growth. These findings suggest that PIF4’s oligomerization competence contributes significantly to thermomorphogenesis by enabling partner recruitment, allowing DNA-binding and transactivation functions to be supplied in trans.

Similar content being viewed by others

Direct photoresponsive inhibition of a p53-like transcription activation domain in PIF3 by Arabidopsis phytochrome B

Article Open access 23 September 2021

Heat-activated growth of metastable and length-defined DNA fibers expands traditional polymer assembly

Article Open access 23 May 2024

A primordial DNA store and compute engine

Article 22 August 2024

Data availability

The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article/Supplementary material; further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author. Source data are provided with this paper.

References

  1. Jagadish, S. V. K., Way, D. A. & Sharkey, T. D. Plant heat stress: concepts directing future research. Plant Cell Environ. 44, 1992–2005 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Ding, Y. & Yang, S. Surviving and thriving: how plants perceive and respond to temperature stress. Dev. Cell 57, 947–958 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Ludwig, W., Hayes, S., Trenner, J., Delker, C. & Quint, M. On the evolution of plant thermomorphogenesis. J. Exp. Bot. 72, 7345–7358 (2021).

  4. Casal, J. J. & Balasubramanian, S. Thermomorphogenesis. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 70, 321–346 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Delker, C., Quint, M. & Wigge, P. A. Recent advances in understanding thermomorphogenesis signaling. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 68, 102231 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Park, Y.-J., Kim, J. Y., Lee, J.-H., Han, S.-H. & Park, C.-M. External and internal reshaping of plant thermomorphogenesis. Trends Plant Sci. 26, 810–821 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Koini, M. A. et al. High temperature-mediated adaptations in plant architecture require the bHLH transcription factor PIF4. Curr. Biol. 19, 408–413 (2009).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Fiorucci, A.-S. et al. PHYTOCHROME INTERACTING FACTOR 7 is important for early responses to elevated temperature in Arabidopsis seedlings. N. Phytol. 226, 50–58 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Ding, L. et al. Two B-box domain proteins, BBX18 and BBX23, interact with ELF3 and regulate thermomorphogenesis in Arabidopsis. Cell Rep. 25, 1718–1728.e4 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Chandra Malakar, B. et al. BBX24/BBX25 antagonizes the function of thermosensor ELF3 to promote PIF4-mediated thermomorphogenesis in Arabidopsis. Plant Commun. 0, 101391 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Hwang, G. et al. Overexpression of BBX18 promotes thermomorphogenesis through the PRR5-PIF4 pathway. Front. Plant Sci. 12, 782352 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  12. Zhou, Y. et al. TCP transcription factors associate with PHYTOCHROME INTERACTING FACTOR 4 and CRYPTOCHROME 1 to regulate thermomorphogenesis in Arabidopsis thaliana. iScience 15, 600–610 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  13. Han, X. et al. Arabidopsis transcription factor TCP5 controls plant thermomorphogenesis by positively regulating PIF4 activity. iScience 15, 611–622 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  14. Cortijo, S. et al. Transcriptional regulation of the ambient temperature response by H2A.Z nucleosomes and HSF1 transcription factors in arabidopsis. Mol. Plant 10, 1258–1273 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  15. Tan, W. et al. The heat response regulators HSFA1s promote Arabidopsis thermomorphogenesis via stabilizing PIF4 during the day. Sci. Adv. 9, eadh1738 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  16. Li, B. et al. Heat shock factor A1s are required for phytochrome-interacting factor 4-mediated thermomorphogenesis in Arabidopsis. J. Integr. Plant Biol. 66, 20–35 (2024).

  17. Ibañez, C. et al. Brassinosteroids dominate hormonal regulation of plant thermomorphogenesis via BZR1. Curr. Biol. 28, 303–310.e3 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  18. Qiu, Y. Regulation of PIF4-mediated thermosensory growth. Plant Sci. 297, 110541 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  19. Fan, D. et al. A multisensor high-temperature signaling framework for triggering daytime thermomorphogenesis in Arabidopsis. Nat. Commun. 16, 5197 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  20. Raschke, A. et al. Natural variants of ELF3 affect thermomorphogenesis by transcriptionally modulating PIF4-dependent auxin response genes. BMC Plant Biol. 15, 197 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  21. Tian, S. et al. The evening complex component ELF3 recruits H3K4me3 demethylases to repress PHYTOCHROME INTERACTING FACTOR4 and 5 in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 37, koaf014 (2025).

  22. Box, M. S. et al. ELF3 controls thermoresponsive growth in Arabidopsis. Curr. Biol. 25, 194–199 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  23. Jung, J.-H. et al. Phytochromes function as thermosensors in Arabidopsis. Science 354, 886–889 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  24. Jung, J.-H. et al. A prion-like domain in ELF3 functions as a thermosensor in Arabidopsis. Nature 585, 256–260 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  25. Li, Z.-Y. et al. Functions of phytochrome interacting factors (PIFs) in adapting plants to biotic and abiotic stresses. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 25, 2198 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  26. Paik, I., Kathare, P. K., Kim, J.-I. & Huq, E. Expanding roles of PIFs in signal integration from multiple processes. Mol. Plant 10, 1035–1046 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  27. Cai, X. & Huq, E. Shining light on plant growth: recent insights into phytochrome interacting factors. J. Exp. Bot. 76, 646–663 (2025).

  28. Sakuraba, Y. et al. Phytochrome-interacting transcription factors PIF4 and PIF5 induce leaf senescence in Arabidopsis. Nat. Commun. 5, 4636 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  29. Leivar, P. et al. Multiple phytochrome-interacting bHLH transcription factors repress premature seedling photomorphogenesis in darkness. Curr. Biol. 18, 1815–1823 (2008).

    Google Scholar 

  30. Shin, J. et al. Phytochromes promote seedling light responses by inhibiting four negatively-acting phytochrome-interacting factors. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 106, 7660–7665 (2009).

    Google Scholar 

  31. Lee, C.-M. & Thomashow, M. F. Photoperiodic regulation of the C-repeat binding factor (CBF) cold acclimation pathway and freezing tolerance in Arabidopsis thaliana. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 109, 15054–15059 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  32. Li, N., Bo, C., Zhang, Y. & Wang, L. PHYTOCHROME INTERACTING FACTORS PIF4 and PIF5 promote heat stress induced leaf senescence in Arabidopsis. J. Exp. Bot. 72, 4577–4589 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  33. Sakuraba, Y., Bülbül, S., Piao, W., Choi, G. & Paek, N.-C. Arabidopsis EARLY FLOWERING3 increases salt tolerance by suppressing salt stress response pathways. Plant J. 92, 1106–1120 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  34. Wang, Z., Perez, V. & Hua, J. Guard cell activity of PIF4 represses disease resistance in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell Environ. 48, 1468–1478 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  35. Zhang, X. et al. Near-infrared light and PIF4 promote plant antiviral defense by enhancing RNA interference. Plant Commun. 5, 100644 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  36. Liu, Z. et al. FLS2-RBOHD-PIF4 module regulates plant response to drought and salt stress. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 23, 1080 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  37. Khanna, R. et al. A novel molecular recognition motif necessary for targeting photoactivated phytochrome signaling to specific basic helix-loop-helix transcription factors. Plant Cell 16, 3033–3044 (2004).

    Google Scholar 

  38. Lambert, S. A. et al. The human transcription factors. Cell 172, 650–665 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  39. Strader, L., Weijers, D. & Wagner, D. Plant transcription factors—being in the right place with the right company. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 65, 102136 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  40. Blanc-Mathieu, R., Dumas, R., Turchi, L., Lucas, J. & Parcy, F. Plant-TFClass: a structural classification for plant transcription factors. Trends Plant Sci. 29, 40–51 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  41. Soto, L. F. et al. Compendium of human transcription factor effector domains. Mol. Cell 82, 514–526 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  42. Morffy, N. et al. Identification of plant transcriptional activation domains. Nature 632, 166–173 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  43. Jolma, A. et al. DNA-binding specificities of human transcription factors. Cell 152, 327–339 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  44. Már, M., Nitsenko, K. & Heidarsson, P. O. Multifunctional intrinsically disordered regions in transcription factors. Chemistry 29, e202203369 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  45. Miao, J. & Chong, S. Roles of intrinsically disordered protein regions in transcriptional regulation and genome organization. Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev. 90, 102285 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  46. Boija, A. et al. Transcription factors activate genes through the phase-separation capacity of their activation domains. Cell 175, 1842–1855.e16 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  47. Funnell, A. P. W. & Crossley, M. Homo- and heterodimerization in transcriptional regulation. Adv. Exp. Med. Biol. 747, 105–121 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  48. Frank, F., Liu, X. & Ortlund, E. A. Glucocorticoid receptor condensates link DNA-dependent receptor dimerization and transcriptional transactivation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 118, e2024685118 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  49. Mignon, K. et al. DNA-binding and dimerization of the SOG1 NAC domain are functionally linked with its ability to undergo liquid-liquid phase separation. Nucleic Acids Res. 54, gkaf1522 (2026).

  50. Toledo-Ortiz, G., Huq, E. & Quail, P. H. The Arabidopsis basic/helix-loop-helix transcription factor family. Plant Cell 15, 1749–1770 (2003).

    Google Scholar 

  51. Vayssières, A., Huettel, B., Franzen, R., Richter, R. & Chai, J. PIF4 enhances DNA binding of CDF2 to co-regulate target gene expression and promote Arabidopsis hypocotyl cell elongation. Nat. Plants 8, 1082–1093 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  52. Bu, Q., Castillon, A., Chen, F., Zhu, L. & Huq, E. Dimerization and blue light regulation of PIF1 interacting bHLH proteins in Arabidopsis. Plant Mol. Biol. 77, 501–511 (2011).

    Google Scholar 

  53. Sun, J., Qi, L., Li, Y., Chu, J. & Li, C. PIF4-mediated activation of YUCCA8 expression integrates temperature into the auxin pathway in regulating Arabidopsis hypocotyl growth. PLoS Genet. 8, e1002594 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  54. Zhu, J.-Y., Oh, E., Wang, T. & Wang, Z.-Y. TOC1–PIF4 interaction mediates the circadian gating of thermoresponsive growth in Arabidopsis. Nat. Commun. 7, 13692 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  55. Bajracharya, A. et al. PHYTOCHROME-INTERACTING FACTOR 4/HEMERA-mediated thermosensory growth requires the Mediator subunit MED14. Plant Physiol. 190, 2706–2721 (2022).

  56. Shapulatov, U. et al. The Mediator complex subunit MED25 interacts with HDA9 and PIF4 to regulate thermomorphogenesis. Plant Physiol. 192, 582–600 (2023).

  57. Yoo, C. Y. et al. Direct photoresponsive inhibition of a p53-like transcription activation domain in PIF3 by Arabidopsis phytochrome B. Nat. Commun. 12, 1–16 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  58. Huai, J. et al. JASMONATE ZIM-domain protein 3 regulates photomorphogenesis and thermomorphogenesis through inhibiting PIF4 in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol. 195, 2274–2288 (2024).

  59. Luo, F. et al. A Phytochrome B-PIF4-MYC2/MYC4 module inhibits secondary cell wall thickening in response to shaded light. Plant Commun. 3, 100416 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  60. Peng, M. et al. Activation and memory of the heat shock response is mediated by prion-like domains of sensory HSFs in Arabidopsis. Mol. Plant 18, 457–467 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  61. Xie, Y. et al. Phytochrome B inhibits the activity of phytochrome-interacting factor 7 involving phase separation. Cell Rep. 42, 113562 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  62. Erdős, G., Pajkos, M. & Dosztányi, Z. IUPred3: prediction of protein disorder enhanced with unambiguous experimental annotation and visualization of evolutionary conservation. Nucleic Acids Res. 49, W297–W303 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  63. Chong, S. et al. Imaging dynamic and selective low-complexity domain interactions that control gene transcription. Science 361, eaar2555 (2018).

  64. Trojanowski, J. et al. Transcription activation is enhanced by multivalent interactions independent of phase separation. Mol. Cell 82, 1878–1893.e10 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  65. Dalton, J. C., Bätz, U., Liu, J., Curie, G. L. & Quail, P. H. A modified reverse one-hybrid screen identifies transcriptional activation domains in PHYTOCHROME-INTERACTING FACTOR 3. Front. Plant Sci. 7, 881 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  66. Hope, I. A. & Struhl, K. Functional dissection of a eukaryotic transcriptional activator protein, GCN4 of yeast. Cell 46, 885–894 (1986).

    Google Scholar 

  67. Hope, I. A., Mahadevan, S. & Struhl, K. Structural and functional characterization of the short acidic transcriptional activation region of yeast GCN4 protein. Nature 333, 635–640 (1988).

    Google Scholar 

  68. Staller, M. V. et al. Directed mutational scanning reveals a balance between acidic and hydrophobic residues in strong human activation domains. Cell Syst. 13, 334–345.e5 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  69. Staller, M. V. et al. A high-throughput mutational scan of an intrinsically disordered acidic transcriptional activation domain. Cell Syst. 6, 444–455.e6 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  70. Kotha, S. R. & Staller, M. Clusters of acidic and hydrophobic residues can predict acidic transcriptional activation domains from protein sequence. Genetics 225, iyad131 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  71. Hong, Y. et al. Hydrophobicity of arginine leads to reentrant liquid-liquid phase separation behaviors of arginine-rich proteins. Nat. Commun. 13, 7326 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  72. Vernon, R. M. et al. Pi-Pi contacts are an overlooked protein feature relevant to phase separation. Elife 7, e31486 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  73. Voronova, A. & Baltimore, D. Mutations that disrupt DNA binding and dimer formation in the E47 helix-loop-helix protein map to distinct domains. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 87, 4722–4726 (1990).

    Google Scholar 

  74. Ferré-D’Amaré, A. R., Pognonec, P., Roeder, R. G. & Burley, S. K. Structure and function of the b/HLH/Z domain of USF. EMBO J. 13, 180–189 (1994).

    Google Scholar 

  75. Al-Sady, B., Kikis, E. A., Monte, E. & Quail, P. H. Mechanistic duality of transcription factor function in phytochrome signaling. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 105, 2232–2237 (2008).

    Google Scholar 

  76. Udupa, A., Kotha, S. R. & Staller, M. V. Commonly asked questions about transcriptional activation domains. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 84, 102732 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  77. Erijman, A. et al. A high-throughput screen for transcription activation domains reveals their sequence features and permits prediction by deep learning. Mol. Cell 78, 890–902.e6 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  78. Sanborn, A. L. et al. Simple biochemical features underlie transcriptional activation domain diversity and dynamic, fuzzy binding to Mediator. Elife 10, e68068 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  79. Arnold, C. D. et al. A high-throughput method to identify trans-activation domains within transcription factor sequences. EMBO J. 37, e98896 (2018).

  80. Hummel, N. F. C. et al. The trans-regulatory landscape of gene networks in plants. Cell Syst. 14, 501–511.e4 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  81. Smith, N. C. & Matthews, J. M. DNA-binding, multivalent interactions and phase separation in transcriptional activation. Aust. J. Chem. 76, 351–360 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  82. Davis, R. L., Cheng, P., Lassar, A. & Weintraub, H. The MyoD DNA binding domain contains a recognition code for muscle-specific gene activation. Cell 60, 733–746 (1990).

    Google Scholar 

  83. Hao, Y., Oh, E., Choi, G., Liang, Z. & Wang, Z.-Y. Interactions between HLH and bHLH factors modulate light-regulated plant development. Mol. Plant 5, 688–697 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  84. Roig-Villanova, I. et al. Interaction of shade avoidance and auxin responses: a role for two novel atypical bHLH proteins. EMBO J. 26, 4756–4767 (2007).

    Google Scholar 

  85. Porcher, C., Liao, E. C., Fujiwara, Y., Zon, L. I. & Orkin, S. H. Specification of hematopoietic and vascular development by the bHLH transcription factor SCL without direct DNA binding. Development 126, 4603–4615 (1999).

    Google Scholar 

  86. Amoutzias, G. D., Robertson, D. L., Van de Peer, Y. & Oliver, S. G. Choose your partners: dimerization in eukaryotic transcription factors. Trends Biochem. Sci. 33, 220–229 (2008).

    Google Scholar 

  87. Ortega, E. et al. Transcription factor dimerization activates the p300 acetyltransferase. Nature 562, 538–544 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  88. Hinde, E. et al. Quantifying the dynamics of the oligomeric transcription factor STAT3 by pair correlation of molecular brightness. Nat. Commun. 7, 1–14 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  89. Sayou, C. et al. A SAM oligomerization domain shapes the genomic binding landscape of the LEAFY transcription factor. Nat. Commun. 7, 11222 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  90. Shimizu, S. et al. Multimerization of the GATA4 transcription factor regulates transcriptional activity and cardiomyocyte hypertrophic response. Int. J. Biol. Sci. 18, 1079–1095 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  91. Minucci, S. et al. Oligomerization of RAR and AML1 transcription factors as a novel mechanism of oncogenic activation. Mol. Cell 5, 811–820 (2000).

    Google Scholar 

  92. Stenger, J. E. et al. p53 oligomerization and DNA looping are linked with transcriptional activation. EMBO J. 13, 6011–6020 (1994).

    Google Scholar 

  93. Qiu, Y., Li, M., Kim, R. J.-A., Moore, C. M. & Chen, M. Daytime temperature is sensed by phytochrome B in Arabidopsis through a transcriptional activator HEMERA. Nat. Commun. 10, 140 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  94. Jin, H., Lin, J. & Zhu, Z. PIF4 and HOOKLESS1 impinge on common transcriptome and isoform regulation in thermomorphogenesis. Plant Commun. 1, 100034 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  95. Huai, J. et al. SEUSS and PIF4 coordinately regulate light and temperature signaling pathways to control plant growth. Mol. Plant 11, 928–942 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  96. Zhou, N. et al. Histone methylation readers MRG1/2 interact with PIF4 to promote thermomorphogenesis in Arabidopsis. Cell Rep. 43, 113726 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  97. Kim, J., Lee, H., Lee, H. G. & Seo, P. J. Get closer and make hotspots: liquid–liquid phase separation in plants. EMBO Rep. 22, e51656 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  98. Ryu, K., Park, G. & Cho, W.-K. Emerging insights into transcriptional condensates. Exp. Mol. Med. 56, 820–826 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  99. Powers, S. K. et al. Nucleo-cytoplasmic partitioning of ARF proteins controls auxin responses in Arabidopsis thaliana. Mol. Cell 76, 177–190.e5 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  100. Poudyal, M. et al. Intermolecular interactions underlie protein/peptide phase separation irrespective of sequence and structure at crowded milieu. Nat. Commun. 14, 6199 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  101. Hannon, C. E. & Eisen, M. B. Intrinsic protein disorder is insufficient to drive subnuclear clustering in embryonic transcription factors. Elife 12, RP88221 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  102. Kim, H., Lee, N., Kim, Y. & Choi, G. The phytochrome-interacting factor genes PIF1 and PIF4 are functionally diversified due to divergence of promoters and proteins. Plant Cell 36, 2778–2797 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank all the Qiu lab members for their critical comments and suggestions regarding the manuscript. This work was supported by the National Science Foundation (NSF) grants IOS-2200200 and IOS-2239963 to Y.Q., and the National Institutes of Health (NIH) grant R01GM087388 to M.C. The work related to the confocal microscope was supported by an Institutional Development Award (IDeA) from the National Institute of General Medical Sciences (NIGMS) of the NIH under award number P20GM130460 to the Imaging Research Core of the Glycoscience Center of Research Excellence (GlyCORE) at the University of Mississippi. We would like to thank Drs. Gregg Roman, Ruofan Cao, and John Adams in the Imaging Research Core of GlyCORE at the University of Mississippi for their assistance with using the Leica SP8 Inverted Confocal Microscope.

Author information

Author notes
  1. These authors contributed equally: Haibo Xiong, Abhishesh Bajracharya.

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Biology, University of Mississippi, University, MS, USA

    Haibo Xiong, Abhishesh Bajracharya, Ranjeeta Odari, Eden E. Bayer, Alyssa Stoner, Anupa Wasti & Yongjian Qiu

  2. Natural Products Utilization Research Unit, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, University, MS, USA

    Jing Xi & Scott R. Baerson

  3. National Center for Natural Products Research, School of Pharmacy, University of Mississippi, University, MS, USA

    Jing Xi

  4. Department of Botany and Plant Sciences, Institute for Integrative Genome Biology, University of California, Riverside, CA, USA

    Meng Chen

Authors
  1. Haibo Xiong
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Abhishesh Bajracharya
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Ranjeeta Odari
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Eden E. Bayer
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Alyssa Stoner
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Anupa Wasti
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Jing Xi
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Scott R. Baerson
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Meng Chen
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  10. Yongjian Qiu
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

Y.Q. initiated the project in M.C.’s laboratory; Y.Q., H.X., and A.B. conceived the original research plan; Y.Q., S.R.B., and J.X. supervised the experiments; H.X., A.B., R.O., E.E.B, A.S., A.W., J.X., and Y.Q. performed the experiments; H.X., A.B., R.O., J.X., and Y.Q. analyzed the data; M.C. provided instructions, materials, and facilities on the completion of yeast-related data in Fig. 2b and Supplementary Fig. 1; Y.Q., H.X., and A.B. wrote the article with the contributions from all authors; all authors approved the submitted version.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yongjian Qiu.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Peer review

Peer review information

Nature Communications thanks Ziqiang Zhu, and the other, anonymous, reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work. A peer review file is available.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Information (download PDF )

Reporting Summary (download PDF )

Transparent Peer Review file (download PDF )

Source data

Source Data (download XLSX )

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if you modified the licensed material. You do not have permission under this licence to share adapted material derived from this article or parts of it. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Xiong, H., Bajracharya, A., Odari, R. et al. Oligomerization-competent PIF4 drives thermomorphogenesis through functional redundancy in transactivation and DNA binding. Nat Commun (2026). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-026-70748-x

Download citation

  • Received: 04 August 2025

  • Accepted: 03 March 2026

  • Published: 17 March 2026

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-026-70748-x

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

Download PDF

Advertisement

Explore content

  • Research articles
  • Reviews & Analysis
  • News & Comment
  • Videos
  • Collections
  • Subjects
  • Follow us on Facebook
  • Follow us on X
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed

About the journal

  • Aims & Scope
  • Editors
  • Journal Information
  • Open Access Fees and Funding
  • Calls for Papers
  • Editorial Values Statement
  • Journal Metrics
  • Editors' Highlights
  • Contact
  • Editorial policies
  • Top Articles

Publish with us

  • For authors
  • For Reviewers
  • Language editing services
  • Open access funding
  • Submit manuscript

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

  • Explore articles by subject
  • Find a job
  • Guide to authors
  • Editorial policies

Nature Communications (Nat Commun)

ISSN 2041-1723 (online)

nature.com footer links

About Nature Portfolio

  • About us
  • Press releases
  • Press office
  • Contact us

Discover content

  • Journals A-Z
  • Articles by subject
  • protocols.io
  • Nature Index

Publishing policies

  • Nature portfolio policies
  • Open access

Author & Researcher services

  • Reprints & permissions
  • Research data
  • Language editing
  • Scientific editing
  • Nature Masterclasses
  • Research Solutions

Libraries & institutions

  • Librarian service & tools
  • Librarian portal
  • Open research
  • Recommend to library

Advertising & partnerships

  • Advertising
  • Partnerships & Services
  • Media kits
  • Branded content

Professional development

  • Nature Awards
  • Nature Careers
  • Nature Conferences

Regional websites

  • Nature Africa
  • Nature China
  • Nature India
  • Nature Japan
  • Nature Middle East
  • Privacy Policy
  • Use of cookies
  • Legal notice
  • Accessibility statement
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Your US state privacy rights
Springer Nature

© 2026 Springer Nature Limited

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing