Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Advertisement

Nature Communications
  • View all journals
  • Search
  • My Account Login
  • Content Explore content
  • About the journal
  • Publish with us
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed
  1. nature
  2. nature communications
  3. articles
  4. article
An epithelial morphogenetic program for maximal urine concentration
Download PDF
Download PDF
  • Article
  • Open access
  • Published: 21 March 2026

An epithelial morphogenetic program for maximal urine concentration

  • Jane N. Warshaw1,2,
  • Sunhee Oh1,2,
  • Christopher P. Chaney  ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0002-4144-41802,
  • Bryanna L. Felan1,2,
  • Jacqueline B. Pham1,2,
  • Chitkale Hiremath1,2,
  • Kenya Geshow1,2,
  • Hao Liu2,
  • Alejandra M. Rivera  ORCID: orcid.org/0009-0004-2323-25221,2,
  • Rain Wong1,2,
  • Song Zhang  ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0002-9364-40533,
  • Kevin M. Dean  ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0003-0839-23204,
  • Reto P. Fiolka  ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0002-4636-50004,
  • Michael T. Dellinger5,6,
  • Jonathan M. Whittamore7,
  • Thomas J. Carroll  ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0002-8322-49282,6 &
  • …
  • Denise K. Marciano  ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0003-0612-46641,2 

Nature Communications , Article number:  (2026) Cite this article

  • 3205 Accesses

  • Metrics details

We are providing an unedited version of this manuscript to give early access to its findings. Before final publication, the manuscript will undergo further editing. Please note there may be errors present which affect the content, and all legal disclaimers apply.

Subjects

  • Morphogenesis
  • Nephrons
  • Tight junctions

Abstract

Mammals achieve the highest urine concentrations of any vertebrate, a feat that hinges on generating steep osmotic gradients within the renal medulla. Interestingly, the region with the highest osmolality, the inner medulla, is unique to mammals. Among the nephron’s segments, the ascending thin limb (aTL) is the sole element exclusive to this zone and is thought to mediate passive salt reabsorption. However, the architecture and functional impact of the aTL have remained obscure. Here we uncover an unexpected morphogenetic program in the aTL, characterized by extensive apical-junctional interdigitations that greatly increase cell-to-cell contact area. Integrating single-nucleus transcriptomics with high-resolution imaging, we identify claudin-10b, a tight junction protein and paracellular cation pore, as a central driver of this architecture. Inducible deletion of claudin-10b specifically in the aTL abolishes membrane interdigitations and markedly reduces urine-concentrating ability, thereby establishing a direct link between segment-specific epithelial morphology and whole-organ function. Claudin-10b proves necessary for interdigitation formation, acting through transcellular adhesion and interaction with the tight-junction scaffold ZO1. These findings offer definitive evidence that the inner medulla and aTL are essential for maximal urinary concentration, while revealing a non-canonical, morphogenetic role for claudin-10b.

Similar content being viewed by others

Tight junction channel regulation by interclaudin interference

Article Open access 30 June 2022

Effects of anserine on oxidative stress and on cell barrier integrity in methylmalonic aciduria

Article Open access 25 September 2025

Human peritoneal tight junction, transporter and channel expression in health and kidney failure, and associated solute transport

Article Open access 13 October 2023

Data availability

The single nucleus RNA sequencing data generated in this study have been deposited in the Gene Expression Omnibus database under accession code GSE295103. The processed mean expression data and differential gene expression analysis are available in Supplementary Data 1–7. All other data supporting this study is available from the corresponding author upon request. Source data are provided with this paper.

References

  1. Dantzler, W. H., Layton, A. T., Layton, H. E. & Pannabecker, T. L. Urine-concentrating mechanism in the inner medulla: function of the thin limbs of the loops of Henle. Clin. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol. 9, 1781–1789 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Sands, J. M. & Layton, H. E. Advances in understanding the urine-concentrating mechanism. Annu. Rev. Physiol. 76, 387–409 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Rocha, A. S. & Kokko, J. P. Sodium chloride and water transport in the medullary thick ascending limb of Henle. Evidence for active chloride transport. J. Clin. Invest. 52, 612–623 (1973).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Igarashi, P., Vanden Heuvel, G. B., Payne, J. A. & Forbush, B. 3rd Cloning, embryonic expression, and alternative splicing of a murine kidney-specific Na-K-Cl cotransporter. Am. J. Physiol. 269, F405–F418 (1995).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Imai, M. & Kokko, J. P. Sodium chloride, urea, and water transport in the thin ascending limb of Henle. Generation of osmotic gradients by passive diffusion of solutes. J. Clin. Invest. 53, 393–402 (1974).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Takahashi, N. et al. Characterization of Na+ transport across the cell membranes of the ascending thin limb of Henle’s loop. Kidney Int. 47, 789–794 (1995).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Kokko, J. P. & Rector, F. C. Jr. Countercurrent multiplication system without active transport in inner medulla. Kidney Int. 2, 214–223 (1972).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Yoshitomi, K., Kondo, Y. & Imai, M. Evidence for conductive Cl- pathways across the cell membranes of the thin ascending limb of Henle’s loop. J. Clin. Invest. 82, 866–871 (1988).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Uchida, S. & Marumo, F. Severely impaired urine-concentrating ability in mice lacking the CLC-K1 chloride channel. Exp. Nephrol. 8, 361–365 (2000).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Matsumura, Y. et al. Overt nephrogenic diabetes insipidus in mice lacking the CLC-K1 chloride channel. Nat. Genet 21, 95–98 (1999).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Lin, M. H. et al. Impairment in renal medulla development underlies salt wasting in Clc-k2 channel deficiency. JCI Insight https://doi.org/10.1172/jci.insight.151039 (2021).

  12. Wigle, J. T. & Oliver, G. Prox1 function is required for the development of the murine lymphatic system. Cell 98, 769–778 (1999).

    Google Scholar 

  13. Kim, Y.-M. et al. Role of Prox1 in the transforming ascending thin limb of Henle’s loop during mouse kidney development. PLoS ONE 10, e0127429 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  14. Srinivasan, R. S. et al. Lineage tracing demonstrates the venous origin of the mammalian lymphatic vasculature. Genes Dev. 21, 2422–2432 (2007).

    Google Scholar 

  15. Uchida, S. et al. Localization and functional characterization of rat kidney-specific chloride channel, ClC-K1. J. Clin. Invest. 95, 104–113 (1995).

    Google Scholar 

  16. Chakraborty, T. et al. Light-sheet microscopy of cleared tissues with isotropic, subcellular resolution. Nat. Methods 16, 1109–1113 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  17. Sonntag, S. R. et al. Diuretic state affects ascending thin limb tight junctions. Am. J. Physiol. Ren. Physiol. 314, F190–F195 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  18. Ransick, A. et al. Single-cell profiling reveals sex, lineage, and regional diversity in the mouse kidney. Dev. Cell 51, 399–413 e397 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  19. CZI Cell Science Program, et al. CZ CELLxGENE Discover: a single-cell data platform for scalable exploration, analysis and modeling of aggregated data. Nucleic Acids Res. 53, D886–D900 (2025).

  20. Van Itallie, C. M. & Anderson, J. M. Claudins and epithelial paracellular transport. Annu. Rev. Physiol. 68, 403–429 (2006).

    Google Scholar 

  21. Itoh, M. et al. Direct binding of three tight junction-associated MAGUKs, ZO-1, ZO-2, and ZO-3, with the COOH termini of claudins. J. Cell Biol. 147, 1351–1363 (1999).

    Google Scholar 

  22. Van Itallie, C. M. et al. Two splice variants of claudin-10 in the kidney create paracellular pores with different ion selectivities. Am. J. Physiol. Ren. Physiol. 291, F1288–F1299 (2006).

    Google Scholar 

  23. Gunzel, D. et al. Claudin-10 exists in six alternatively spliced isoforms that exhibit distinct localization and function. J. Cell Sci. 122, 1507–1517 (2009).

    Google Scholar 

  24. Otani, T. et al. Claudins and JAM-A coordinately regulate tight junction formation and epithelial polarity. J. Cell Biol. 218, 3372–3396 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  25. Miyazaki, S. et al. Mechanism of interdigitation formation at apical boundary of MDCK cell. iScience 26, 106594 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  26. Furuse, M. et al. Reconstitution of functional tight junctions with individual claudin subtypes in epithelial cells. Cell Struct. Funct. 48, 1–17 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  27. Morita, K., Furuse, M., Fujimoto, K. & Tsukita, S. Claudin multigene family encoding four-transmembrane domain protein components of tight junction strands. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 96, 511–516 (1999).

    Google Scholar 

  28. Krause, G. et al. Structure and function of extracellular claudin domains. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 1165, 34–43 (2009).

    Google Scholar 

  29. Hempel, C. et al. Assembly of tight junction strands: claudin-10b and claudin-3 form homo-tetrameric building blocks that polymerise in a channel-independent manner. J. Mol. Biol. 432, 2405–2427 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  30. Piontek, J. et al. Formation of tight junction: determinants of homophilic interaction between classic claudins. FASEB J. 22, 146–158 (2008).

    Google Scholar 

  31. Yu, A. S. et al. Molecular basis for cation selectivity in claudin-2-based paracellular pores: identification of an electrostatic interaction site. J. Gen. Physiol. 133, 111–127 (2009).

    Google Scholar 

  32. Van Itallie, C., Rahner, C. & Anderson, J. M. Regulated expression of claudin-4 decreases paracellular conductance through a selective decrease in sodium permeability. J. Clin. Invest. 107, 1319–1327 (2001).

    Google Scholar 

  33. Van Itallie, C. M., Lidman, K. F., Tietgens, A. J. & Anderson, J. M. Newly synthesized claudins but not occludin are added to the basal side of the tight junction. Mol. Biol. Cell 30, 1406–1424 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  34. Tokuda, S., Higashi, T. & Furuse, M. ZO-1 knockout by TALEN-mediated gene targeting in MDCK cells: involvement of ZO-1 in the regulation of cytoskeleton and cell shape. PLoS ONE 9, e104994 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  35. Hancock, J. F., Paterson, H. & Marshall, C. J. A polybasic domain or palmitoylation is required in addition to the CAAX motif to localize p21ras to the plasma membrane. Cell 63, 133–139 (1990).

    Google Scholar 

  36. Klar, J. et al. Altered paracellular cation permeability due to a rare CLDN10B variant causes anhidrosis and kidney damage. PLoS Genet. 13, e1006897 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  37. Milatz, S. A novel claudinopathy based on claudin-10 mutations. Int. J. Mol. Sci. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms20215396 (2019).

  38. Fu, Y., Gu, Y., Zheng, Z., Wasteneys, G. & Yang, Z. Arabidopsis interdigitating cell growth requires two antagonistic pathways with opposing action on cell morphogenesis. Cell 120, 687–700 (2005).

    Google Scholar 

  39. Schoofs, H. et al. Dynamic cytoskeletal regulation of cell shape supports resilience of lymphatic endothelium. Nature 641, 465–475 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  40. Ansel, M., Ramachandran, K., Dey, G. & Brunet, T. Origin and evolution of microvilli. Biol. Cell 116, e2400054 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  41. Derderian, C., Canales, G. I. & Reiter, J. F. Seriously cilia: a tiny organelle illuminates evolution, disease, and intercellular communication. Dev. Cell 58, 1333–1349 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  42. Mattila, P. K. & Lappalainen, P. Filopodia: molecular architecture and cellular functions. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 9, 446–454 (2008).

    Google Scholar 

  43. Yamada, E. The fine structure of the renal glomerulus of the mouse. J. Biophys. Biochem. Cytol. 1, 551–566 (1955).

    Google Scholar 

  44. Scott, R. P. & Quaggin, S. E. Review series: the cell biology of renal filtration. J. Cell Biol. 209, 199–210 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  45. Holzman, L. B. et al. Nephrin localizes to the slit pore of the glomerular epithelial cell. Kidney Int. 56, 1481–1491 (1999).

    Google Scholar 

  46. Gunzel, D. & Yu, A. S. Claudins and the modulation of tight junction permeability. Physiol. Rev. 93, 525–569 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  47. Kubota, K. et al. Ca(2+)-independent cell-adhesion activity of claudins, a family of integral membrane proteins localized at tight junctions. Curr. Biol. 9, 1035–1038 (1999).

    Google Scholar 

  48. Quintanova, C. et al. Unrecognized role of claudin-10b in basolateral membrane infoldings of the thick ascending limb. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 1517, 266–278 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  49. van der Veen, R. E. et al. Claudin-4 polymerizes after a small extracellular claudin-3-like substitution. J. Biol. Chem. 300, 107693 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  50. Spadaro, D. et al. Tension-dependent stretching activates ZO-1 to control the junctional localization of its interactors. Curr. Biol. 27, 3783–3795 e3788 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  51. Schwayer, C. et al. Mechanosensation of tight junctions depends on ZO-1 phase separation and flow. Cell 179, 937–952 e918 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  52. Quadros, R. M. et al. Easi-CRISPR: a robust method for one-step generation of mice carrying conditional and insertion alleles using long ssDNA donors and CRISPR ribonucleoproteins. Genome Biol. 18, 92 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  53. Lun, A. T. L., Pages, H. & Smith, M. L. beachmat: a bioconductor C++ API for accessing high-throughput biological data from a variety of R matrix types. PLoS Comput. Biol. 14, e1006135 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  54. Lun, A. T., Bach, K. & Marioni, J. C. Pooling across cells to normalize single-cell RNA sequencing data with many zero counts. Genome Biol. 17, 75 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  55. Xu, C. & Su, Z. Identification of cell types from single-cell transcriptomes using a novel clustering method. Bioinformatics 31, 1974–1980 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  56. Haghverdi, L., Buttner, M., Wolf, F. A., Buettner, F. & Theis, F. J. Diffusion pseudotime robustly reconstructs lineage branching. Nat. Methods 13, 845–848 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  57. van Dijk, D. et al. Recovering gene interactions from single-cell data using data diffusion. Cell 174, 716–729 e727 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  58. Chaney, C. P., Drake, K. A. & Carroll, T. J. Integration of multiple, diverse methods to identify biologically significant marker genes. J. Mol. Biol. 434, 167754 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  59. Finak, G. et al. MAST: a flexible statistical framework for assessing transcriptional changes and characterizing heterogeneity in single-cell RNA sequencing data. Genome Biol. 16, 278 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  60. Liberzon, A. et al. The molecular signatures database (MSigDB) hallmark gene set collection. Cell Syst. 1, 417–425 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  61. Sergushichev, A. A. An algorithm for fast preranked gene set enrichment analysis using cumulative statistic calculation. Preprint at bioRxiv https://doi.org/10.1101/060012 (2016).

  62. Aibar, S. et al. SCENIC: single-cell regulatory network inference and clustering. Nat. Methods 14, 1083–1086 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  63. Marciano, D. K. et al. p120 catenin is required for normal renal tubulogenesis and glomerulogenesis. Development 138, 2099–2109 (2011).

    Google Scholar 

  64. Mostov, K. E. & Deitcher, D. L. Polymeric immunoglobulin receptor expressed in MDCK cells transcytoses IgA. Cell 46, 613–621 (1986).

    Google Scholar 

  65. Belardi, B. et al. A weak link with actin organizes tight junctions to control epithelial permeability. Dev. Cell 54, 792–804 e797 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  66. Yu, A. S. Electrophysiological characterization of claudin ion permeability using stably transfected epithelial cell lines. Methods Mol. Biol. 762, 27–41 (2011).

    Google Scholar 

  67. Gao, L. et al. Afadin orients cell division to position the tubule lumen in developing renal tubules. Development 144, 3511–3520 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  68. Liu, H. et al. Heterozygous mutation of Vegfr3 reduces renal lymphatics without renal dysfunction. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol. 32, 3099–3113 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank the UTSW O’Brien Kidney Research Core, CRI Transgenic Core, McDermott Sequencing Core, and Mineral Metabolism Core. We thank Elizabeth Chen, D.J. Pan, Josh Mendell, and Don Hilgemann (UTSW) for helpful suggestions. We thank Mikio Furuse (National Institute for Physiological Sciences) and Tetsu Otani (Tokyo Metropolitan University) for cell lines and suggestions. This work was funded by NIH R01DK118032 (D.K.M.), R01DK141873 (D.K.M.), RM1GM145399 (K.M.D.) and R35GM133522 (R.F.).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Cell Biology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA

    Jane N. Warshaw, Sunhee Oh, Bryanna L. Felan, Jacqueline B. Pham, Chitkale Hiremath, Kenya Geshow, Alejandra M. Rivera, Rain Wong & Denise K. Marciano

  2. Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Nephrology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA

    Jane N. Warshaw, Sunhee Oh, Christopher P. Chaney, Bryanna L. Felan, Jacqueline B. Pham, Chitkale Hiremath, Kenya Geshow, Hao Liu, Alejandra M. Rivera, Rain Wong, Thomas J. Carroll & Denise K. Marciano

  3. Department of Health Data Science and Biostatistics, Peter O’Donnell Jr. School of Public Health, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA

    Song Zhang

  4. Lyda Hill Department of Bioinformatics, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA

    Kevin M. Dean & Reto P. Fiolka

  5. Department of Surgery, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA

    Michael T. Dellinger

  6. Department of Molecular Biology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA

    Michael T. Dellinger & Thomas J. Carroll

  7. The Charles and Jane Pak Center for Mineral Metabolism and Clinical Research, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA

    Jonathan M. Whittamore

Authors
  1. Jane N. Warshaw
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Sunhee Oh
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Christopher P. Chaney
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Bryanna L. Felan
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Jacqueline B. Pham
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Chitkale Hiremath
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Kenya Geshow
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Hao Liu
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Alejandra M. Rivera
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  10. Rain Wong
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  11. Song Zhang
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  12. Kevin M. Dean
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  13. Reto P. Fiolka
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  14. Michael T. Dellinger
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  15. Jonathan M. Whittamore
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  16. Thomas J. Carroll
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  17. Denise K. Marciano
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

J.N.W., M.T.D., T.J.C., and D.K.M. conceptualized the study and designed experiments. J.N.W., S.O., B.L.F., J.B.P., C.H., K.G., H.L., A.M.R., and J.M.W. conducted experiments. J.N.W., B.L.F., J.B.P., K.G., and A.M.R. executed mouse studies. J.N.W. and S.O. generated and analyzed cell lines. J.N.W. conducted immunofluorescence and confocal imaging. J.N.W., S.O., C.H., R.W., S.Z., and D.K.M. analyzed data. C.P.C. executed the single nucleus RNA sequencing bioinformatic analysis. B.L.F., H.L., K.M.D., and R.P.F. collected light sheet microscopy images. J.N.W. and D.K.M. wrote the manuscript. All authors reviewed and revised the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Denise K. Marciano.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

K.M.D. and R.P.F. hold a patent for the axially scanned light-sheet microscope that is currently licensed by Intelligent Imaging Innovations, Inc. and subsequently sub-licensed by Life Canvas Technologies, but do not have any investment interests or financial stakes in these companies. K.M.D. has an investment interest in Discovery Imaging Systems, LLC. All other authors have no competing interests.

Peer review

Peer review information

Nature Communications thanks Vidhi Dalal, Benjamin Humphreys, and the other, anonymous, reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work. A peer review file is available.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Information (download PDF )

Description of Additional Supplementary Files (download PDF )

Supplementary Data 1

Supplementary Data 2

Supplementary Data 3

Supplementary Data 4

Supplementary Data 5

Supplementary Data 6

Supplementary Data 7

Supplementary Movie 1 (download MOV )

Supplementary Movie 2 (download MOV )

Supplementary Movie 3 (download MOV )

Supplementary Movie 4 (download MOV )

Supplementary Movie 5 (download MOV )

Supplementary Movie 6 (download MOV )

Reporting Summary (download PDF )

Transparent Peer Review file (download PDF )

Source data

Source Data (download XLSX )

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if you modified the licensed material. You do not have permission under this licence to share adapted material derived from this article or parts of it. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Warshaw, J.N., Oh, S., Chaney, C.P. et al. An epithelial morphogenetic program for maximal urine concentration. Nat Commun (2026). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-026-70938-7

Download citation

  • Received: 15 July 2025

  • Accepted: 06 March 2026

  • Published: 21 March 2026

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-026-70938-7

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

Download PDF

Advertisement

Explore content

  • Research articles
  • Reviews & Analysis
  • News & Comment
  • Videos
  • Collections
  • Subjects
  • Follow us on Facebook
  • Follow us on X
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed

About the journal

  • Aims & Scope
  • Editors
  • Journal Information
  • Open Access Fees and Funding
  • Calls for Papers
  • Editorial Values Statement
  • Journal Metrics
  • Editors' Highlights
  • Contact
  • Editorial policies
  • Top Articles

Publish with us

  • For authors
  • For Reviewers
  • Language editing services
  • Open access funding
  • Submit manuscript

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

  • Explore articles by subject
  • Find a job
  • Guide to authors
  • Editorial policies

Nature Communications (Nat Commun)

ISSN 2041-1723 (online)

nature.com footer links

About Nature Portfolio

  • About us
  • Press releases
  • Press office
  • Contact us

Discover content

  • Journals A-Z
  • Articles by subject
  • protocols.io
  • Nature Index

Publishing policies

  • Nature portfolio policies
  • Open access

Author & Researcher services

  • Reprints & permissions
  • Research data
  • Language editing
  • Scientific editing
  • Nature Masterclasses
  • Research Solutions

Libraries & institutions

  • Librarian service & tools
  • Librarian portal
  • Open research
  • Recommend to library

Advertising & partnerships

  • Advertising
  • Partnerships & Services
  • Media kits
  • Branded content

Professional development

  • Nature Awards
  • Nature Careers
  • Nature Conferences

Regional websites

  • Nature Africa
  • Nature China
  • Nature India
  • Nature Japan
  • Nature Middle East
  • Privacy Policy
  • Use of cookies
  • Legal notice
  • Accessibility statement
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Your US state privacy rights
Springer Nature

© 2026 Springer Nature Limited

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing