Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Advertisement

Nature Communications
  • View all journals
  • Search
  • My Account Login
  • Content Explore content
  • About the journal
  • Publish with us
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed
  1. nature
  2. nature communications
  3. articles
  4. article
Small-molecule binding and sensing with a designed protein family
Download PDF
Download PDF
  • Article
  • Open access
  • Published: 28 March 2026

Small-molecule binding and sensing with a designed protein family

  • Gyu Rie Lee1,2,3,4 na1,
  • Samuel J. Pellock  ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0002-7557-79851,2 na1,
  • Christoffer Norn1,2 na1,
  • Doug Tischer  ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0003-3633-55421,2,
  • Justas Dauparas  ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0002-0030-144X1,2,
  • Ivan Anishchenko  ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0003-3645-20441,2,
  • Jaron A. M. Mercer5,6,7,8,
  • Alex Kang  ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0001-5487-04991,2,
  • Asim K. Bera  ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0001-9473-29121,2,
  • Hannah Nguyen  ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0001-9696-40041,2,
  • Evans Brackenbrough1,2,
  • Banumathi Sankaran  ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0002-3266-81319,
  • Inna Goreshnik1,2,
  • Dionne Vafeados  ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0002-2560-89071,2,
  • Nicole Roullier  ORCID: orcid.org/0009-0004-8430-95381,2,
  • Hannah L. Han  ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0002-4787-51681,2,
  • Brian Coventry  ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0002-6910-62551,2,3,
  • Hugh K. Haddox1,2,
  • David R. Liu  ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0002-9943-75575,6,7,
  • Andy Hsien-Wei Yeh  ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0002-9023-776X10 &
  • …
  • David Baker  ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0001-7896-62171,2,3 

Nature Communications , Article number:  (2026) Cite this article

  • 2535 Accesses

  • 7 Altmetric

  • Metrics details

We are providing an unedited version of this manuscript to give early access to its findings. Before final publication, the manuscript will undergo further editing. Please note there may be errors present which affect the content, and all legal disclaimers apply.

Subjects

  • Biosensors
  • Machine learning
  • Protein design
  • Sensors and probes

Abstract

The de novo design of small-molecule–binding proteins holds great promise as a potential tool to develop sensors on-demand for arbitrary small molecules. Here we combine deep learning and physics-based methods to generate a family of proteins with diverse and designable pocket geometries, which we employ to computationally design binders for six small-molecule targets. Biophysical characterization of the designed binders reveals nanomolar to low micromolar binding affinities and atomic-level design accuracy. Additionally, we use a cortisol binder to design a chemically induced dimerization (CID) system that enables the construction of a biosensor for cortisol detection. The approach described here demonstrates the potential of the NTF2 fold and deep learning-based protein design in sensor development, paving the way for future platforms to design binders and sensors for small molecules across analytical, environmental, and biomedical applications.

Similar content being viewed by others

Design of protein-binding proteins from the target structure alone

Article 24 March 2022

De novo design of protein interactions with learned surface fingerprints

Article Open access 26 April 2023

Improving de novo protein binder design with deep learning

Article Open access 06 May 2023

Data availability

The X-ray crystallographic structure data generated in this study have been deposited in the Protein Data Bank under the accession IDs 8UQF, 8VFQ, and 8VEZ, corresponding to the cortisol-binding protein and the apixaban-binding proteins, respectively. The deep sequencing data have been deposited in the NCBI database with the accession ID PRJNA1356499. Source data are provided with this paper.

Code availability

The design scripts developed in this study have been deposited on Zenodo [https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17847477].

References

  1. Stanton, B. Z., Chory, E. J. & Crabtree, G. R. Chemically induced proximity in biology and medicine. Science 359 (2018).

  2. Glasgow, A. A. et al. Computational design of a modular protein sense-response system. Science 366, 1024–1028 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Taylor, N. D. et al. Engineering an allosteric transcription factor to respond to new ligands. Nat. Methods 13, 177–183 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Tinberg, C. E. et al. Computational design of ligand-binding proteins with high affinity and selectivity. Nature 501, 212–216 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Bick, M. J. et al. Computational design of environmental sensors for the potent opioid fentanyl. Elife 6 (2017).

  6. Beltrán, J. et al. Rapid biosensor development using plant hormone receptors as reprogrammable scaffolds. Nat. Biotechnol. 40, 1855–1861 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Dou, J. et al. De novo design of a fluorescence-activating β-barrel. Nature 561, 485–491 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Polizzi, N. F. et al. De novo design of a hyperstable non-natural protein–ligand complex with sub-Å accuracy. Nat. Chem. 9, 1157–1164 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Polizzi, N. F. & DeGrado, W. F. A defined structural unit enables de novo design of small-molecule-binding proteins. Science 369, 1227–1233 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Cochran, F. V. et al. Computational de novo design and characterization of a four-helix bundle protein that selectively binds a nonbiological cofactor. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 127, 1346–1347 (2005).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Farid, T. A. et al. Elementary tetrahelical protein design for diverse oxidoreductase functions. Nat. Chem. Biol. 9, 826–833 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  12. An, L. et al. Binding and sensing diverse small molecules using shape-complementary pseudocycles. Science 385, 276–282 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  13. Klima, J. C. et al. Incorporation of sensing modalities into de novo designed fluorescence-activating proteins. Nat. Commun. 12, 856 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  14. Basanta, B. et al. An enumerative algorithm for de novo design of proteins with diverse pocket structures. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 117, 22135–22145 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  15. Pan, X. & Kortemme, T. De novo protein fold families expand the designable ligand binding site space. PLoS Comput. Biol. 17, e1009620 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  16. Dou, J. et al. Sampling and energy evaluation challenges in ligand binding protein design. Protein Sci 26, 2426–2437 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  17. Eberhardt, R. Y. et al. Filling out the structural map of the NTF2-like superfamily. BMC Bioinformatics 14, 327 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  18. Bullock, T. L., Clarkson, D. W., Kent, H. M. & Stewart, M. The 1.6 Å Resolution Crystal Structure of Nuclear Transport Factor 2 (NTF2). J. Mol. Biol. 260, 422–431 (1996).

    Google Scholar 

  19. Yeh, A. H.-W. et al. De novo design of luciferases using deep learning. Nature 614, 774–780 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  20. Dauparas, J. et al. Robust deep learning-based protein sequence design using ProteinMPNN. Science 378, 49–56 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  21. Jumper, J. et al. Highly accurate protein structure prediction with AlphaFold. Nature 596, 583–589 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  22. Hellhammer, D. H., Wüst, S. & Kudielka, B. M. Salivary cortisol as a biomarker in stress research. Psychoneuroendocrinology 34, 163–171 (2009).

    Google Scholar 

  23. Hanley, J. P. Warfarin reversal. J. Clin. Pathol. 57, 1132–1139 (2004).

    Google Scholar 

  24. Bom, A. et al. A novel concept of reversing neuromuscular block: chemical encapsulation of rocuronium bromide by a cyclodextrin-based synthetic host. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed Engl. 41, 266–270 (2002).

    Google Scholar 

  25. Lu, G. et al. A specific antidote for reversal of anticoagulation by direct and indirect inhibitors of coagulation factor Xa. Nat. Med. 19, 446–451 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  26. Mathijssen, R. H. J. et al. Irinotecan pharmacokinetics-pharmacodynamics: the clinical relevance of prolonged exposure to SN-38. Br. J. Cancer 87, 144–150 (2002).

    Google Scholar 

  27. Morejón García, G. et al. Generation of monoclonal antibodies against 17α-hydroxyprogesterone for newborn screening of congenital adrenal hyperplasia. Clin. Chim. Acta 485, 311–315 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  28. Boyken, S. E. et al. De novo design of protein homo-oligomers with modular hydrogen-bond network-mediated specificity. Science 352, 680–687 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  29. Basanta, B. et al. Introduction of a polar core into the de novo designed protein Top7. Protein Sci 25, 1299–1307 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  30. Cao, L. et al. Design of protein-binding proteins from the target structure alone. Nature 605, 551–560 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  31. Krishna, R. et al. Generalized biomolecular modeling and design with RoseTTAFold All-Atom. Science 384, eadl2528 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  32. Wicky, B. I. M. et al. Hallucinating symmetric protein assemblies. Science 378, 56–61 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  33. Laudat, M. H. et al. Salivary cortisol measurement: a practical approach to assess pituitary-adrenal function. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 66, 343–348 (1988).

    Google Scholar 

  34. Yanovski, J. A., Cutler, G. B. Jr, Chrousos, G. P. & Nieman, L. K. The dexamethasone-suppressed corticotropin-releasing hormone stimulation test differentiates mild Cushing’s disease from normal physiology. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 83, 348–352 (1998).

    Google Scholar 

  35. Park, H., Zhou, G., Baek, M., Baker, D. & DiMaio, F. Force Field Optimization Guided by Small Molecule Crystal Lattice Data Enables Consistent Sub-Angstrom Protein–Ligand Docking. J. Chem. Theory Comput. 17, 2000–2010 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  36. Tamara, S., den Boer, M. A. & Heck, A. J. R. High-resolution native mass spectrometry. Chem. Rev. 122, 7269–7326 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  37. Dixon, A. S. et al. NanoLuc Complementation Reporter Optimized for Accurate Measurement of Protein Interactions in Cells. ACS Chem. Biol. 11, 400–408 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  38. Landrum, G. RDKit: A software suite for cheminformatics, computational chemistry, and predictive modeling. http://www.rdkit.org/RDKit_Overview.pdf.

  39. Wang, J., Wang, W., Kollman, P. A. & Case, D. A. Automatic atom type and bond type perception in molecular mechanical calculations. J. Mol. Graph. Model. 25, 247–260 (2006).

    Google Scholar 

  40. Bannwarth, C. et al. Extended tight-binding quantum chemistry methods. Wiley Interdiscip. Rev. Comput. Mol. Sci. 11 (2021).

  41. Cole, J. C., Korb, O., McCabe, P., Read, M. G. & Taylor, R. Knowledge-Based Conformer Generation Using the Cambridge Structural Database. J. Chem. Inf. Model. 58, 615–629 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  42. Tosco, P., Stiefl, N. & Landrum, G. Bringing the MMFF force field to the RDKit: implementation and validation. J. Cheminform. 6, 37 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  43. Zubatyuk, R., Smith, J. S., Leszczynski, J. & Isayev, O. Accurate and transferable multitask prediction of chemical properties with an atoms-in-molecules neural network. Sci Adv 5, eaav6490 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  44. Maguire, J. B. et al. Perturbing the energy landscape for improved packing during computational protein design. Proteins 89, 436–449 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  45. Lee, G. R. et al. Design scripts for “Small-molecule binding and sensing with a designed protein family”. Zenodo. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17847477 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  46. Leaver-Fay, A. et al. ROSETTA3: an object-oriented software suite for the simulation and design of macromolecules. Methods Enzymol 487, 545–574 (2011).

    Google Scholar 

  47. Tyka, M. D. et al. Alternate states of proteins revealed by detailed energy landscape mapping. J. Mol. Biol. 405, 607–618 (2011).

    Google Scholar 

  48. Klein, J. C. et al. Multiplex pairwise assembly of array-derived DNA oligonucleotides. Nucleic Acids Res 44, e43 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  49. Benatuil, L., Perez, J. M., Belk, J. & Hsieh, C.-M. An improved yeast transformation method for the generation of very large human antibody libraries. Protein Eng. Des. Sel. 23, 155–159 (2010).

    Google Scholar 

  50. Gietz, R. D. & Schiestl, R. H. Large-scale high-efficiency yeast transformation using the LiAc/SS carrier DNA/PEG method. Nat. Protoc. 2, 38–41 (2007).

    Google Scholar 

  51. Jacobs, T. M., Yumerefendi, H., Kuhlman, B. & Leaver-Fay, A. SwiftLib: rapid degenerate-codon-library optimization through dynamic programming. Nucleic Acids Res 43, e34 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  52. Zhang, J., Kobert, K., Flouri, T. & Stamatakis, A. PEAR: a fast and accurate Illumina Paired-End reAd mergeR. Bioinformatics 30, 614–620 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  53. Rubin, A. F. et al. Correction to: A statistical framework for analyzing deep mutational scanning data. Genome Biol 19, 17 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  54. Qian, J. et al. Accelerating protein design by scaling experimental characterization. bioRxiv https://doi.org/10.1101/2025.08.05.668824 (2025).

  55. Dang, B. et al. SNAC-tag for sequence-specific chemical protein cleavage. Nat. Methods 16, 319–322 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  56. Kabsch, W. XDS. Acta Crystallogr. D Biol. Crystallogr. 66, 125–132 (2010).

    Google Scholar 

  57. Liebschner, D. et al. Macromolecular structure determination using X-rays, neutrons and electrons: recent developments in Phenix. Acta Crystallogr D Struct Biol 75, 861–877 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  58. Emsley, P. & Cowtan, K. Coot: model-building tools for molecular graphics. Acta Crystallogr. D Biol. Crystallogr. 60, 2126–2132 (2004).

    Google Scholar 

  59. Williams, C. J. et al. MolProbity: More and better reference data for improved all-atom structure validation. Protein Sci 27, 293–315 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  60. Zhang, Y. & Skolnick, J. TM-align: a protein structure alignment algorithm based on the TM-score. Nucleic Acids Res 33, 2302–2309 (2005).

    Google Scholar 

  61. Bennett, N. R. et al. Improving de novo protein binder design with deep learning. Nat. Commun. 14, 2625 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  62. Marty, M. T. et al. Bayesian deconvolution of mass and ion mobility spectra: from binary interactions to polydisperse ensembles. Anal. Chem. 87, 4370–4376 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank B. Basanta for useful discussions on generating NTF2 scaffolds for binder design. This research was supported by the National Institute on Aging (R01AG063845 to I.G., N.R., and B.C.;R01CA240339 to I.G. and N.R.;R0AI160052 to A.B.); the Open Philanthropy Project Improving Protein Design Fund (to G.R.L., S.J.P., D.T., J.D., A.B., H.N., I.G., and B.C.); the Washington Research Foundation, Innovation Fellows Program (to G.R.L.); a Washington Research Foundation Fellowship (S.J.P.); the NIH Pathway to Independence Award R00EB031913 (A.H.-W.Y.); Department of Defense, Defense Threat Reduction Agency (HDTRA1-21-1-0007 to I.A.;HDTRA1-21-1-0038 to I.G.;HDTRA1-19-1-0003 to S.J.P., G.R.L., and D.T.); the Audacious Project at the Institute for Protein Design (A.K., A.B., H.N., H.H.); Microsoft (D.T., J.D., and I.A.); Howard Hughes Medical Institute (G.R.L., D.B., A.B., I.A., and D.R.L.); the Air Force Office of Scientific Research (FA9550-18-1-0297 to S.P.); Novo Nordisk Foundation (NNF18OC0030446 to C.N.); the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) (Contract No. 75N93022C00036 and HHSN272201700059C to I.A.); the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency program Harnessing Enzymatic Activity for Lifesaving Remedies (HEALR) under award HR0011-21-2-0012 (to A.B. and I.G.); National Science Foundation grant CHE-1629214 (A.B.); Spark Therapeutics (I.A.); Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation (#OPP1156262 to A.K. and H.N.); AMGEN (I.G.); NovoNordisk (I.G.); the Nordstrom Barrier Institute for Protein Design Directors Fund (I.G.); Dr. Eric and Ms. Wendy Schmidt, and Schmidt Futures funding from Eric and Wendy Schmidt by recommendation of the Schmidt Futures program (I.G.); R35GM118062 (D.R.L); R01EB031172 (D.R.L.); R01EB027793 (D.R.L.); a Ruth L. Kirchstein National Science Research Award Postdoctoral Fellowship (F32 GM133088 to J.A.M.M.). Crystallographic data were collected at the APS and ALS. Advanced Photon Source (APS) Northeastern Collaborative Access Team beamline 24ID-C, is funded by the National Institute of General Medical Sciences from the National Institutes of Health (P30 GM124165). This research used resources of the Advanced Photon Source, a U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office of Science User Facility operated for the DOE Office of Science by Argonne National Laboratory under Contract No. DE-AC02-06CH11357. The Advanced Light Source (ALS) is supported by the Director, Office of Science, Office of 20 Basic Energy Sciences and US Department of Energy under contract number DE-AC02- 05CH11231. The Berkeley Center for Structural Biology is supported in part by the National Institutes of Health (NIH), National Institute of General Medical Sciences. Native mass spectrometry measurements were provided by the NIH-funded Resource for Native Mass Spectrometry Guided Structural Biology at The Ohio State University (NIH P41 GM128577 awarded to Vicki Wysocki).

Author information

Author notes
  1. These authors contributed equally: Gyu Rie Lee, Samuel J. Pellock, Christoffer Norn.

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Biochemistry, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA

    Gyu Rie Lee, Samuel J. Pellock, Christoffer Norn, Doug Tischer, Justas Dauparas, Ivan Anishchenko, Alex Kang, Asim K. Bera, Hannah Nguyen, Evans Brackenbrough, Inna Goreshnik, Dionne Vafeados, Nicole Roullier, Hannah L. Han, Brian Coventry, Hugh K. Haddox & David Baker

  2. Institute for Protein Design, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA

    Gyu Rie Lee, Samuel J. Pellock, Christoffer Norn, Doug Tischer, Justas Dauparas, Ivan Anishchenko, Alex Kang, Asim K. Bera, Hannah Nguyen, Evans Brackenbrough, Inna Goreshnik, Dionne Vafeados, Nicole Roullier, Hannah L. Han, Brian Coventry, Hugh K. Haddox & David Baker

  3. Howard Hughes Medical Institute, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA

    Gyu Rie Lee, Brian Coventry & David Baker

  4. Department of Biological Sciences, Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology, Daejeon, Republic of Korea

    Gyu Rie Lee

  5. Merkin Institute of Transformative Technologies in Healthcare, Broad Institute of Harvard and MIT, Cambridge, MA, USA

    Jaron A. M. Mercer & David R. Liu

  6. Department of Chemistry and Chemical Biology, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA, USA

    Jaron A. M. Mercer & David R. Liu

  7. Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA, USA

    Jaron A. M. Mercer & David R. Liu

  8. Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, University of California Santa Cruz, Santa Cruz, CA, USA

    Jaron A. M. Mercer

  9. Berkeley Center for Structural Biology, Molecular Biophysics and Integrated Bioimaging, Lawrence Berkeley Laboratory, 1 Cyclotron Road, Berkeley, CA, USA

    Banumathi Sankaran

  10. Department of Biomolecular Engineering, University of California Santa Cruz, Santa Cruz, CA, USA

    Andy Hsien-Wei Yeh

Authors
  1. Gyu Rie Lee
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Samuel J. Pellock
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Christoffer Norn
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Doug Tischer
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Justas Dauparas
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Ivan Anishchenko
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Jaron A. M. Mercer
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Alex Kang
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Asim K. Bera
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  10. Hannah Nguyen
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  11. Evans Brackenbrough
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  12. Banumathi Sankaran
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  13. Inna Goreshnik
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  14. Dionne Vafeados
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  15. Nicole Roullier
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  16. Hannah L. Han
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  17. Brian Coventry
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  18. Hugh K. Haddox
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  19. David R. Liu
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  20. Andy Hsien-Wei Yeh
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  21. David Baker
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

D.B. supervised research. G.R.L., S.J.P., and C.N. conceptualized the small-molecule binder design project and performed analysis on binder screening and characterization data. G.R.L. contributed computational metrics for design approach 1, developed the design approach 2 pipeline, experimentally characterized the designs, and participated in LigandMPNN development. S.J.P. redesigned NTF2 scaffolds, formulated design approach 1, and experimentally characterized the designs. C.N. developed the design approach 1 pipeline. A.H-W.Y. conceptualized and characterized the design of chemical-induced dimerizations. S.J.P. and G.R.L. assisted with designing and characterizing cortisol-induced dimers. G.R.L., S.J.P., A.H-W.Y., and D.B. wrote the manuscript. D.T. and I.A. contributed to NTF2 scaffold design. J.D. provided LigandMPNN. J.A.M.M. performed the synthesis of biotinylated ligands under D.R.L.’s supervision. S.J.P., A.K., A.B., and H.N. performed crystallography experiments, data collection, and determined the crystal structure of the cortisol binder. G.R.L., S.J.P., A.K., A.B., E.B., and B.S. performed crystallography experiments, data collection, and determined the crystal structure of the apixaban binder. I.G., D.V., and N.R. helped with yeast library assembly and deep sequencing. H.L.H. assisted with protein purification and BLI experiments. B.C. provided guidance on miniprotein design for the cortisol-induced dimerization system. H.K.H. helped with NGS data analysis.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Andy Hsien-Wei Yeh or David Baker.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

G.R.L., S.J.P., C.N., A.H-W.Y., and D.B. are co-inventors on several provisional patent applications submitted by the University of Washington pertaining to the designed protein sequences generated in this work (application numbers: US 63/599,194 and PCT 18/945,961). The remaining authors declare no competing interests.

Peer review

Peer review information

Nature Communications thanks the anonymous reviewers for their contribution to the peer review of this work. A peer review file is available.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Information (download PDF )

Reporting Summary (download PDF )

Transparent Peer Review file (download PDF )

Source data

Source Data (download ZIP )

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Lee, G.R., Pellock, S.J., Norn, C. et al. Small-molecule binding and sensing with a designed protein family. Nat Commun (2026). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-026-70953-8

Download citation

  • Received: 06 August 2024

  • Accepted: 10 March 2026

  • Published: 28 March 2026

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-026-70953-8

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

Download PDF

Advertisement

Explore content

  • Research articles
  • Reviews & Analysis
  • News & Comment
  • Videos
  • Collections
  • Subjects
  • Follow us on Facebook
  • Follow us on X
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed

About the journal

  • Aims & Scope
  • Editors
  • Journal Information
  • Open Access Fees and Funding
  • Calls for Papers
  • Editorial Values Statement
  • Journal Metrics
  • Editors' Highlights
  • Contact
  • Editorial policies
  • Top Articles

Publish with us

  • For authors
  • For Reviewers
  • Language editing services
  • Open access funding
  • Submit manuscript

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

  • Explore articles by subject
  • Find a job
  • Guide to authors
  • Editorial policies

Nature Communications (Nat Commun)

ISSN 2041-1723 (online)

nature.com footer links

About Nature Portfolio

  • About us
  • Press releases
  • Press office
  • Contact us

Discover content

  • Journals A-Z
  • Articles by subject
  • protocols.io
  • Nature Index

Publishing policies

  • Nature portfolio policies
  • Open access

Author & Researcher services

  • Reprints & permissions
  • Research data
  • Language editing
  • Scientific editing
  • Nature Masterclasses
  • Research Solutions

Libraries & institutions

  • Librarian service & tools
  • Librarian portal
  • Open research
  • Recommend to library

Advertising & partnerships

  • Advertising
  • Partnerships & Services
  • Media kits
  • Branded content

Professional development

  • Nature Awards
  • Nature Careers
  • Nature Conferences

Regional websites

  • Nature Africa
  • Nature China
  • Nature India
  • Nature Japan
  • Nature Middle East
  • Privacy Policy
  • Use of cookies
  • Legal notice
  • Accessibility statement
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Your US state privacy rights
Springer Nature

© 2026 Springer Nature Limited

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing