Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Advertisement

Nature Communications
  • View all journals
  • Search
  • My Account Login
  • Content Explore content
  • About the journal
  • Publish with us
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed
  1. nature
  2. nature communications
  3. articles
  4. article
Structural basis for pH-responsive amino acid transport via SLC7A4.
Download PDF
Download PDF
  • Article
  • Open access
  • Published: 28 March 2026

Structural basis for pH-responsive amino acid transport via SLC7A4.

  • Dimitrios Kolokouris  ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0003-4101-26921,2,3,
  • Anuja Bothra  ORCID: orcid.org/0009-0007-8006-04071,2,
  • Takafumi Kato1,2,
  • Yi C. Zeng  ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0001-9964-09291,2,
  • Simon Lichtinger  ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0002-0643-67241,3,
  • Joanne L. Parker  ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0003-2964-27201,2,
  • Philip C. Biggin  ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0001-5100-88361,3 &
  • …
  • Simon Newstead  ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0001-7432-22701,2 

Nature Communications , Article number:  (2026) Cite this article

  • 2849 Accesses

  • Metrics details

We are providing an unedited version of this manuscript to give early access to its findings. Before final publication, the manuscript will undergo further editing. Please note there may be errors present which affect the content, and all legal disclaimers apply.

Subjects

  • Cryoelectron microscopy
  • Membrane proteins
  • Permeation and transport

Abstract

The transport of amino acids across cell membranes is essential for metabolism, neuronal signalling, and immune system function. The amino acid polyamine organocation (APC) superfamily controls amino acid transport via mechanisms including amino acid exchange, facilitative diffusion, and sodium- or proton-coupled transport. Although many mammalian APC members functioning as exchangers and sodium-coupled systems have been identified, the mechanisms underlying pH-regulated amino acid transport in mammalian cells remain unclear. Here, we show that the plasma membrane amino acid transporter SLC7A4 is regulated by low extracellular pH and functions as a leucine transporter in human cells. Using Cryo-EM structures of the plant homologue, CAT4, from Arabidopsis thaliana in outward-open apo and L-ornithine-bound states, as well as transport assays and molecular dynamics simulations based on homology models of the human transporter, we identify residues responsible for amino acid selectivity that supports an allosteric mechanism linking ligand recognition to pH regulation. This mechanism is consistent with an evolutionary link to proton-coupled prokaryotic homologues. Overall, our findings provide a structural and functional basis for pH-gated leucine transport by the human SLC7A4 transporter and provides a framework for understanding amino acid selectivity within the wider SLC7 family.

Similar content being viewed by others

Quantitative modelling of amino acid transport and homeostasis in mammalian cells

Article Open access 06 September 2021

Structural informatic study of determined and AlphaFold2 predicted molecular structures of 13 human solute carrier transporters and their water-soluble QTY variants

Article Open access 22 November 2022

Phenotypic profiling of solute carriers characterizes serine transport in cancer

Article Open access 08 December 2023

Data availability

Atomic coordinates for SLC7A4 have been deposited in the Protein Data Bank under accession codes: 9HJK (Apo with Syb), 9SP8 (L-Orn with Syb) and 9SQH (Apo without Syb). The cryo-EM maps have been deposited in the Electron Microscopy Data Bank (EMDB) under accession codes: EMD-52217, EMD-55065 and EMD-55110. Source data are provided with this paper.

Code availability

The processed molecular dynamics simulations trajectories have been uploaded to Zenodo: (https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17184930).

References

  1. Broer, S. & Gauthier-Coles, G. Amino acid homeostasis in mammalian cells with a focus on amino acid transport. J. Nutr. 152, 16–28 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Wang, W. & Zou, W. Amino acids and their transporters in T cell immunity and cancer therapy. Mol. Cell 80, 384–395 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Cui, Z., Joiner, A. M. N., Jansen, R. M. & Hurley, J. H. Amino acid sensing and lysosomal signaling complexes. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 79, 102544 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Bar-Peled, L. & Sabatini, D. M. Regulation of mTORC1 by amino acids. Trends Cell Biol. 24, 400–406 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Yuan, H. et al. Lysine catabolism reprograms tumour immunity through histone crotonylation. Nature 617, 818–826 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Hosios, A. M. et al. Amino acids rather than glucose account for the majority of cell mass in proliferating mammalian cells. Dev. Cell 36, 540–549 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Lieu, E. L., Nguyen, T., Rhyne, S. & Kim, J. Amino acids in cancer. Exp. Mol. Med 52, 15–30 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Kandasamy, P., Gyimesi, G., Kanai, Y. & Hediger, M. A. Amino acid transporters revisited: New views in health and disease. Trends Biochem Sci. 43, 752–789 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Verrey, F. et al. CATs and HATs: the SLC7 family of amino acid transporters. Pflug. Arch. 447, 532–542 (2004).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Jin, C. et al. Pharmacological and structural insights into nanvuranlat, a selective LAT1 (SLC7A5) inhibitor, and its N-acetyl metabolite with implications for cancer therapy. Sci. Rep. 15, 2903 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Markowicz-Piasecka, M., Huttunen, J., Montaser, A. & Huttunen, K. M. Hemocompatible LAT1-inhibitor can induce apoptosis in cancer cells without affecting brain amino acid homeostasis. Apoptosis 25, 426–440 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  12. Kim, C. S. et al. BCH, an inhibitor of system L amino acid transporters, induces apoptosis in cancer cells. Biol. Pharm. Bull. 31, 1096–1100 (2008).

    Google Scholar 

  13. Yun, D. W. et al. JPH203, an L-type amino acid transporter 1-selective compound, induces apoptosis of YD-38 human oral cancer cells. J. Pharm. Sci. 124, 208–217 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  14. Stockwell, B. R. et al. Ferroptosis: a regulated cell death nexus linking metabolism, redox biology, and disease. Cell 171, 273–285 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  15. Tarlungeanu, D. C. et al. Impaired amino acid transport at the blood brain barrier is a cause of autism spectrum disorder. Cell 167, 1481–1494 e18 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  16. Puris, E., Gynther, M., Auriola, S. & Huttunen, K. M. L-Type amino acid transporter 1 as a target for drug delivery. Pharm. Res 37, 88 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  17. Closs, E. I., Boissel, J. P., Habermeier, A. & Rotmann, A. Structure and function of cationic amino acid transporters (CATs). J. Membr. Biol. 213, 67–77 (2006).

    Google Scholar 

  18. Vastermark, A., Wollwage, S., Houle, M. E., Rio, R. & Saier, M. H. Jr Expansion of the APC superfamily of secondary carriers. Proteins 82, 2797–2811 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  19. Shi, Y. Common folds and transport mechanisms of secondary active transporters. Annu Rev. Biophys. 42, 51–72 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  20. Yamashita, A., Singh, S. K., Kawate, T., Jin, Y. & Gouaux, E. Crystal structure of a bacterial homologue of Na+/Cl-dependent neurotransmitter transporters. Nature 437, 215–223 (2005).

    Google Scholar 

  21. Forrest, L. R. Structural symmetry in membrane proteins. Annu Rev. Biophys. 44, 311–337 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  22. Lee, Y. et al. Structural basis of anticancer drug recognition and amino acid transport by LAT1. Nat. Commun. 16, 1635 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  23. Li, Y. et al. Cryo-EM structure of the human Asc-1 transporter complex. Nat. Commun. 15, 3036 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  24. Dai, L. et al. Structural basis for the substrate recognition and transport mechanism of the human y(+)LAT1-4F2hc transporter complex. Sci. Adv. 11, eadq0558 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  25. Dai, L. et al. Structural insights into the human system y(+)L amino acid transporter complex. Structure 33, 1224–1232 e5 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  26. Yan, R. et al. Cryo-EM structure of the human heteromeric amino acid transporter b(0,+)AT-rBAT. Sci. Adv. 6, eaay6379 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  27. Yan, R., Zhou, J., Li, Y., Lei, J. & Zhou, Q. Structural insight into the substrate recognition and transport mechanism of the human LAT2-4F2hc complex. Cell Discov. 6, 82 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  28. Yan, R., Zhao, X., Lei, J. & Zhou, Q. Structure of the human LAT1-4F2hc heteromeric amino acid transporter complex. Nature 568, 127–130 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  29. Parker, J. L. et al. Molecular basis for redox control by the human cystine/glutamate antiporter system xc-. Nat. Commun. 12, 7147 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  30. Rosell, A. et al. Structural bases for the interaction and stabilization of the human amino acid transporter LAT2 with its ancillary protein 4F2hc. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 111, 2966–2971 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  31. Boll, M., Daniel, H. & Gasnier, B. The SLC36 family: proton-coupled transporters for the absorption of selected amino acids from extracellular and intracellular proteolysis. Pflügers Arch.: Eur. J. Physiol. 447, 776–779 (2004).

    Google Scholar 

  32. Fan, S. J. & Goberdhan, D. C. I. PATs and SNATs: amino acid sensors in disguise. Front Pharm. 9, 640 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  33. Jungnickel, K. E. J., Parker, J. L. & Newstead, S. Structural basis for amino acid transport by the CAT family of SLC7 transporters. Nat. Commun. 9, 550 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  34. Wolf, S. et al. Expression of solute carrier 7A4 (SLC7A4) in the plasma membrane is not sufficient to mediate amino acid transport activity. Biochem J. 364, 767–775 (2002).

    Google Scholar 

  35. Wu, Z., Alibay, I., Newstead, S. & Biggin, P. C. Proton Control of Transitions in an Amino Acid Transporter. Biophys. J. 117, 1342–1351 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  36. Tao, Y. et al. Structure of a eukaryotic SWEET transporter in a homotrimeric complex. Nature 527, 259–263 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  37. Vekony, N., Wolf, S., Boissel, J. P., Gnauert, K. & Closs, E. I. Human cationic amino acid transporter hCAT-3 is preferentially expressed in peripheral tissues. Biochemistry 40, 12387–12394 (2001).

    Google Scholar 

  38. Closs, E. I., Graf, P., Habermeier, A., Cunningham, J. M. & Forstermann, U. Human cationic amino acid transporters hCAT-1, hCAT-2A, and hCAT-2B: three related carriers with distinct transport properties. Biochemistry 36, 6462–6468 (1997).

    Google Scholar 

  39. Su, Y. H., Frommer, W. B. & Ludewig, U. Molecular and functional characterization of a family of amino acid transporters from Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol. 136, 3104–3113 (2004).

    Google Scholar 

  40. Schiöth, H. B., Roshanbin, S., Hägglund, M. G. A. & Fredriksson, R. Evolutionary origin of amino acid transporter families SLC32, SLC36 and SLC38 and physiological, pathological and therapeutic aspects. Mol. Asp. Med. 34, 571–585 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  41. Hammes, U. Z., Nielsen, E., Honaas, L. A., Taylor, C. G. & Schachtman, D. P. AtCAT6, a sink-tissue-localized transporter for essential amino acids in Arabidopsis. Plant J. 48, 414–426 (2006).

    Google Scholar 

  42. Carter, C. et al. The vegetative vacuole proteome of Arabidopsis thaliana reveals predicted and unexpected proteins. Plant Cell 16, 3285–3303 (2004).

    Google Scholar 

  43. Yang, H., Postel, S., Kemmerling, B. & Ludewig, U. Altered growth and improved resistance of Arabidopsis against Pseudomonas syringae by overexpression of the basic amino acid transporter AtCAT1. Plant Cell Environ. 37, 1404–1414 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  44. Okumoto, S. & Pilot, G. Amino acid export in plants: a missing link in nitrogen cycling. Mol. Plant 4, 453–463 (2011).

    Google Scholar 

  45. Hammes, U. Z., Meier, S., Dietrich, D., Ward, J. M. & Rentsch, D. Functional properties of the arabidopsis peptide transporters AtPTR1 and AtPTR5. J. Biol. Chem. 285, 39710–39717 (2010).

    Google Scholar 

  46. Sperandeo, M. P. et al. The gene encoding a cationic amino acid transporter (SLC7A4) maps to the region deleted in the velocardiofacial syndrome. Genomics 49, 230–236 (1998).

    Google Scholar 

  47. Xia, L. et al. Structural insights into cationic amino acid transport and viral receptor engagement by CAT1. Nat. Commun. 17, 1108 (2025).

  48. Ye, M. et al. Amino acid and viral binding by the high-affinity Cationic Amino acid Transporter 1 (CAT1) from Mus musculus. Nat. Commun. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-026-69421-0 (2026).

  49. Xie, Y. et al. Structures and an activation mechanism of human potassium-chloride cotransporters. Sci. Adv. 6, eabc5883 (2020).

  50. Yang, X., Wang, Q. & Cao, E. Structure of the human cation-chloride cotransporter NKCC1 determined by single-particle electron cryo-microscopy. Nat. Commun. 11, 1016 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  51. Jeckelmann, J. M. et al. Structure, function and pharmacology of SLC7 family members and homologues. Chim. (Aarau) 76, 1011–1018 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  52. Dickens, D. et al. Modulation of LAT1 (SLC7A5) transporter activity and stability by membrane cholesterol. Sci. Rep. 7, 43580 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  53. Scanga, R. et al. Impact of 7-ketocholesterol on the function and stability of the LAT1 transporter. Biochem Pharm. 239, 117075 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  54. Hutchinson, K. & Schlessinger, A. Comprehensive characterization of LAT1 cholesterol-binding sites. J. Chem. Theory Comput 20, 3349–3358 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  55. Lee, Y. et al. Cryo-EM structure of the human L-type amino acid transporter 1 in complex with glycoprotein CD98hc. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 26, 510–517 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  56. Yan, R. et al. Mechanism of substrate transport and inhibition of the human LAT1-4F2hc amino acid transporter. Cell Discov. 7, 16 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  57. Yang, H. et al. Structural insights into the substrate transport mechanism of the amino acid transporter complex. J. Biol. Chem. 301, 110569 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  58. Krishnamurthy, H. & Gouaux, E. X-ray structures of LeuT in substrate-free outward-open and apo inward-open states. Nature 481, 469–474 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  59. Gao, X. et al. Mechanism of substrate recognition and transport by an amino acid antiporter. Nature 463, 828–832 (2010).

    Google Scholar 

  60. Errasti-Murugarren, E. et al. L amino acid transporter structure and molecular bases for the asymmetry of substrate interaction. Nat. Commun. 10, 1807 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  61. Bansal, M., Kumar, S. & Velavan, R. HELANAL: a program to characterize helix geometry in proteins. J. Biomol. Struct. Dyn. 17, 811–819 (2000).

    Google Scholar 

  62. Wiedmer, T. et al. Metabolic mapping of the human solute carrier superfamily. Mol. Syst. Biol. 21, 560–598 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  63. Yang, H., Krebs, M., Stierhof, Y. D. & Ludewig, U. Characterization of the putative amino acid transporter genes AtCAT2, 3 &4: the tonoplast localized AtCAT2 regulates soluble leaf amino acids. J. Plant Physiol. 171, 594–601 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  64. Winter, G., Todd, C. D., Trovato, M., Forlani, G. & Funck, D. Physiological implications of arginine metabolism in plants. Front Plant Sci. 6, 534 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  65. Blazquez, M. A. Polyamines: their role in plant development and stress. Annu Rev. Plant Biol. 75, 95–117 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  66. Shaffer, P. L., Goehring, A., Shankaranarayanan, A. & Gouaux, E. Structure and mechanism of a Na+-independent amino acid transporter. Sci. (N. Y., NY) 325, 1010–1014 (2009).

    Google Scholar 

  67. Kratochvil, H. T. et al. Transient water wires mediate selective proton transport in designed channel proteins. Nat. Chem. 15, 1012–1021 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  68. Nayak, S. R. et al. Cryo-EM structure of GABA transporter 1 reveals substrate recognition and transport mechanism. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 30, 1023–1032 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  69. Fang, Y. et al. Structure of a prokaryotic virtual proton pump at 3.2 A resolution. Nature 460, 1040–1043 (2009).

    Google Scholar 

  70. Olsson, M. H. M., Sondergaard, C. R., Rostkowski, M. & Jensen, J. H. PROPKA3: consistent treatment of internal and surface residues in empirical pK(a) predictions. J. Chem. Theory Comput. 7, 525–537 (2011).

    Google Scholar 

  71. Rullo-Tubau, J. et al. Structure and mechanisms of transport of human Asc1/CD98hc amino acid transporter. Nat. Commun. 15, 2986 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  72. Wiedmer, T. et al. Accelerating SLC transporter research: streamlining knowledge and validated tools. Clin. Pharm. Ther. 112, 439–442 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  73. Goldmann, U. et al. Data- and knowledge-derived functional landscape of human solute carriers. Mol. Syst. Biol. 21, 599–631 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  74. Jansson, T. Amino acid transporters in the human placenta. Pediatr. Res 49, 141–147 (2001).

    Google Scholar 

  75. Christensen, H. L. et al. The choroid plexus sodium-bicarbonate cotransporter NBCe2 regulates mouse cerebrospinal fluid pH. J. Physiol. 596, 4709–4728 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  76. Bernardino, R. L., Carrageta, D. F., Sousa, M., Alves, M. G. & Oliveira, P. F. pH and male fertility: making sense on pH homeodynamics throughout the male reproductive tract. Cell Mol. Life Sci. 76, 3783–3800 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  77. Parker, J. L. & Newstead, S. Method to increase the yield of eukaryotic membrane protein expression in Saccharomyces cerevisiae for structural and functional studies. Protein Sci. 23, 1309–1314 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  78. Drew, D. et al. GFP-based optimization scheme for the overexpression and purification of eukaryotic membrane proteins in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Nat. Protoc. 3, 784–798 (2008).

    Google Scholar 

  79. Zimmermann, I. et al. Generation of synthetic nanobodies against delicate proteins. Nat. Protoc. 15, 1707–1741 (2020).

  80. Caesar, J. et al. SIMPLE 3.0. Stream single-particle cryo-EM analysis in real time. J. Struct. Biol. X 4, 100040 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  81. Punjani, A., Rubinstein, J. L., Fleet, D. J. & Brubaker, M. A. cryoSPARC: algorithms for rapid unsupervised cryo-EM structure determination. Nat. Methods 14, 290–296 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  82. Zivanov, J. et al. New tools for automated high-resolution cryo-EM structure determination in RELION-3. Elife 7, e42166 (2018).

  83. Mirdita, M. et al. ColabFold: making protein folding accessible to all. Nat. Methods 19, 679–682 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  84. Emsley, P. Tools for ligand validation in Coot. Acta Crystallogr D. Struct. Biol. 73, 203–210 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  85. Afonine, P. V. et al. Real-space refinement in PHENIX for cryo-EM and crystallography. Acta Crystallogr D. Struct. Biol. 74, 531–544 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  86. Long, F. et al. AceDRG: a stereochemical description generator for ligands. Acta Crystallogr D. Struct. Biol. 73, 112–122 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  87. Croll, T. I. ISOLDE: a physically realistic environment for model building into low-resolution electron-density maps. Acta Crystallogr D. Struct. Biol. 74, 519–530 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  88. Pettersen, E. F. et al. UCSF ChimeraX: structure visualization for researchers, educators, and developers. Protein Sci. 30, 70–82 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  89. Parker, J. L., Mindell, J. A. & Newstead, S. Thermodynamic evidence for a dual transport mechanism in a POT peptide transporter. Elife 3, e04273 (2014).

  90. Eswar, N. et al. Comparative protein structure modeling using Modeller. Curr. Protoc. Bioinformatics. 5, Unit-5 6 (2006).

  91. Wu, E. L. et al. CHARMM-GUI Membrane Builder toward realistic biological membrane simulations. J. Comput Chem. 35, 1997–2004 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  92. Lindorff-Larsen, K. et al. Improved side-chain torsion potentials for the Amber ff99SB protein force field. Proteins 78, 1950–1958 (2010).

    Google Scholar 

  93. Jämbeck, J. P. M. & Lyubartsev, A. P. An extension and further validation of an all-atomistic force field for biological membranes. J. Chem. Theory Comput. 8, 2938–2948 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  94. Horn, A. H. A consistent force field parameter set for zwitterionic amino acid residues. J. Mol. Model 20, 2478 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  95. Sousa da Silva, A. W. & Vranken, W. F. ACPYPE - AnteChamber PYthon Parser interfacE. BMC Res Notes 5, 367 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  96. Jorgensen, W. L., Chandrasekhar, J., Madura, J. D., Impey, R. W. & Klein, M. L. Comparison of simple potential functions for simulating liquid water. J. Chem. Phys. 79, 926–935 (1983).

    Google Scholar 

  97. Abraham, M. J. et al. GROMACS: high performance molecular simulations through multi-level parallelism from laptops to supercomputers. SoftwareX 1-2, 19–25 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  98. Essmann, U. et al. A smooth particle mesh Ewald method. J. Chem. Phys. 103, 8577–8593 (1995).

    Google Scholar 

  99. Berendsen, H. J., Postma, J. P. M., van Gunsteren, W. F., DiNola, A. & Haak, J. R. Molecular dynamics with coupling to an external bath. J. Chem. Phys. 81, 3684–3690 (1984).

    Google Scholar 

  100. Parrinello, M. & Rahman, A. Polymorphic transitions in single crystals: a new molecular dynamics method. J. Appl. Phys. 52, 7182–7190 (1981).

    Google Scholar 

  101. Bussi, G., Donadio, D. & Parrinello, M. Canonical sampling through velocity rescaling. J. Chem. Phys. 126, 014101(2007).

  102. Michaud-Agrawal, N., Denning, E. J., Woolf, T. B. & Beckstein, O. MDAnalysis: a toolkit for the analysis of molecular dynamics simulations. J. Comput Chem. 32, 2319–2327 (2011).

    Google Scholar 

  103. Bouysset, C. & Fiorucci, S. ProLIF: a library to encode molecular interactions as fingerprints. J. Cheminform 13, 72 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This research was supported by Wellcome awards (215519/Z/19/Z & 219531/Z/19/Z) to SN and UKRI BBSRC award BB/Z517215/1 to JLP and SN. Computing was supported via the Advanced Research Computing facility, Oxford, the EPSRC ARCHER2 UK National Supercomputing Service and JADE (EP/X035603/1), granted via the High-End Computing Consortium for Biomolecular Simulation (HECBioSim-https://www.hecbiosim.ac.uk), supported by EPSRC (EP/X035603/1) to PCB. DK was supported by a BBSRC studentship (BB/ M011224/1) and an Onassis Foundation PhD scholarship award (F ZO 035-1/2018-2019). AB was supported by a BBSRC studentship (BB/T008784/1). The authors gratefully acknowledge the Micron Bioimaging Facility for their support & assistance in this work.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Biochemistry, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK

    Dimitrios Kolokouris, Anuja Bothra, Takafumi Kato, Yi C. Zeng, Simon Lichtinger, Joanne L. Parker, Philip C. Biggin & Simon Newstead

  2. Kavli Institute for Nanoscience Discovery, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK

    Dimitrios Kolokouris, Anuja Bothra, Takafumi Kato, Yi C. Zeng, Joanne L. Parker & Simon Newstead

  3. Structural Bioinformatics and Computational Biochemistry, Department of Biochemistry, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK

    Dimitrios Kolokouris, Simon Lichtinger & Philip C. Biggin

Authors
  1. Dimitrios Kolokouris
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Anuja Bothra
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Takafumi Kato
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Yi C. Zeng
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Simon Lichtinger
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Joanne L. Parker
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Philip C. Biggin
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Simon Newstead
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

D.K., J.L.P. and S.N. conceived the project. D.K. and A.B. performed all cloning, protein preparation and transport assays. D.K., T.K. and Y.C.Z performed all cryo-EM sample processing, data collection and image analysis. D.K. and S.N. constructed the atomic models with assistance from Y.C.Z. D.K., S.L. and P.C.B. performed all molecular dynamics simulations and analysis. D.K. and S.N. wrote the manuscript and prepared figures with contributions and discussions from J.L.P.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Simon Newstead.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Peer review

Peer review information

Nature Communications thanks Marcel Bermudez and the other, anonymous, reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work. A peer review file is available.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Information (download PDF )

Reporting Summary (download PDF )

Transparent Peer Review file (download PDF )

Source data

Source Data (download XLSX )

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kolokouris, D., Bothra, A., Kato, T. et al. Structural basis for pH-responsive amino acid transport via SLC7A4.. Nat Commun (2026). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-026-70956-5

Download citation

  • Received: 26 September 2025

  • Accepted: 06 March 2026

  • Published: 28 March 2026

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-026-70956-5

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

Download PDF

Advertisement

Explore content

  • Research articles
  • Reviews & Analysis
  • News & Comment
  • Videos
  • Collections
  • Subjects
  • Follow us on Facebook
  • Follow us on X
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed

About the journal

  • Aims & Scope
  • Editors
  • Journal Information
  • Open Access Fees and Funding
  • Calls for Papers
  • Editorial Values Statement
  • Journal Metrics
  • Editors' Highlights
  • Contact
  • Editorial policies
  • Top Articles

Publish with us

  • For authors
  • For Reviewers
  • Language editing services
  • Open access funding
  • Submit manuscript

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

  • Explore articles by subject
  • Find a job
  • Guide to authors
  • Editorial policies

Nature Communications (Nat Commun)

ISSN 2041-1723 (online)

nature.com footer links

About Nature Portfolio

  • About us
  • Press releases
  • Press office
  • Contact us

Discover content

  • Journals A-Z
  • Articles by subject
  • protocols.io
  • Nature Index

Publishing policies

  • Nature portfolio policies
  • Open access

Author & Researcher services

  • Reprints & permissions
  • Research data
  • Language editing
  • Scientific editing
  • Nature Masterclasses
  • Research Solutions

Libraries & institutions

  • Librarian service & tools
  • Librarian portal
  • Open research
  • Recommend to library

Advertising & partnerships

  • Advertising
  • Partnerships & Services
  • Media kits
  • Branded content

Professional development

  • Nature Awards
  • Nature Careers
  • Nature Conferences

Regional websites

  • Nature Africa
  • Nature China
  • Nature India
  • Nature Japan
  • Nature Middle East
  • Privacy Policy
  • Use of cookies
  • Legal notice
  • Accessibility statement
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Your US state privacy rights
Springer Nature

© 2026 Springer Nature Limited

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing