Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Advertisement

Nature Communications
  • View all journals
  • Search
  • My Account Login
  • Content Explore content
  • About the journal
  • Publish with us
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed
  1. nature
  2. nature communications
  3. articles
  4. article
Breaking the rate limiting barrier in lithium||sulfur batteries via spin state engineering
Download PDF
Download PDF
  • Article
  • Open access
  • Published: 24 March 2026

Breaking the rate limiting barrier in lithium||sulfur batteries via spin state engineering

  • Qingbin Jiang1 na1,
  • Huifang Xu1 na1,
  • Xinyu Ye2 na1,
  • Lingwen Liu1,2,
  • Kwan San Hui  ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0001-7089-75873,
  • Chao Wu4,
  • Kang Gao1,
  • Kaitong Sun  ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0002-0045-67751,
  • Haifeng Li  ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0001-8186-11251,
  • Yunshan Zheng1,
  • Cheng-zong Yuan1,
  • Zhongliang Li5,
  • Mingdeng Wei6,
  • Chenyang Zha  ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0002-7491-91461,
  • Jie Zeng  ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0002-8812-02987,8,
  • Mingkai Liu  ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0001-9060-848X8,
  • Yuanmiao Sun  ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0003-4650-52262,
  • Hui-Ming Cheng  ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0002-5387-42412,9,10 &
  • …
  • Kwun Nam Hui  ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0002-3008-85711 

Nature Communications (2026) Cite this article

  • 4799 Accesses

  • 1 Citations

  • 2 Altmetric

  • Metrics details

We are providing an unedited version of this manuscript to give early access to its findings. Before final publication, the manuscript will undergo further editing. Please note there may be errors present which affect the content, and all legal disclaimers apply.

Subjects

  • Batteries
  • Energy

Abstract

Elucidating the mechanisms governing sulfur redox reactions is important for the development of high-energy-density Li||S batteries. Despite progress, the kinetics of the solid-solid conversion from Li2S2 to Li2S remain poorly understood. This work demonstrates that spin-state transitions within reaction intermediates are the key factor of the sluggish kinetics. Guided by density functional theory and machine-learning-assisted catalyst screening, we find a negative correlation between the spin moment of the catalyst and the Gibbs free energy barrier for the Li2S2 to Li2S conversion. Among a series of dual-metal doped catalysts, a Co,Ni-doped MoS2 catalyst, with its high spin moment, modulates the spin states of the reactants, reducing the high free-energy barrier associated with spin-state transitions. Therefore, Li||S batteries incorporating this catalyst show accelerated sulfur conversion, particularly during solid-solid transitions, suppressed polysulfide shuttling, and have stable electrochemical performance. A pouch cell achieves a capacity of 13.2 Ah and a specific energy of 435 Wh kg-1. These findings show mechanistic understanding into the role of spin moments in sulfur conversion, enabling to design efficient and durable catalysts for Li||S batteries.

Similar content being viewed by others

Breaking insulating barriers in solid-phase conversion reactions with dual-atom catalysts for high-energy lithium batteries

Article 15 April 2026

Machine learning-based design of electrocatalytic materials towards high-energy lithium||sulfur batteries development

Article Open access 29 September 2024

Manipulating Li2S2/Li2S mixed discharge products of all-solid-state lithium sulfur batteries for improved cycle life

Article Open access 12 October 2023

Data availability

All data supporting the findings of this study are provided within the article and its Supplementary Information. The data underlying the graphs in the main Figures and Supplementary Figs. are provided in the Source Data file associated with this paper. Source data are provided with this paper.

Code availability

The codes of machine learning models and data processing used in this study are available on Zenodo62 and at: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18681112.

References

  1. Manthiram, A. et al. Rechargeable lithium-sulfur batteries. Chem. Rev. 114, 11751–11787 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Bruce, P. G. et al. Li-O2 and Li-S batteries with high energy storage. Nat. Mater. 11, 19–29 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Ji, X. L., Lee, K. T. & Nazar, L. F. A highly ordered nanostructured carbon-sulphur cathode for lithium-sulphur batteries. Nat. Mater. 8, 500–506 (2009).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Pang, Q. et al. Advances in lithium-sulfur batteries based on multifunctional cathodes and electrolytes. Nat. Energy 1, 16132 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Liu, R. L. et al. Establishing reaction networks in the 16-electron sulfur reduction reaction. Nature 626, 98–104 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Zhou, S. Y. et al. Visualizing interfacial collective reaction behaviour of Li-S batteries. Nature 621, 75–81 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Xue, W. J. et al. Intercalation-conversion hybrid cathodes enabling Li-S full-cell architectures with jointly superior gravimetric and volumetric energy densities. Nat. Energy 4, 374–382 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Li, H. et al. Developing high-power Li||S batteries via transition metal/carbon nanocomposite electrocatalyst engineering. Nat. Nanotechnol. 19, 792–799 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Zhou, L. et al. Host materials anchoring polysulfides in Li-S batteries reviewed. Adv. Energy Mater. 11, 2001304 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Chen, Y. et al. Advances in lithium-sulfur batteries: from academic research to commercial viability. Adv. Mater. 33, 2003666 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Fan, F. Y., Carter, W. C. & Chiang, Y. M. Mechanism and kinetics of Li2S precipitation in lithium-sulfur batteries. Adv. Mater. 27, 5203–5209 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  12. Peng, L. L. et al. A fundamental look at electrocatalytic sulfur reduction reaction. Nat. Catal. 3, 762–770 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  13. Shen, Z. H. et al. Cation-doped ZnS catalysts for polysulfide conversion in lithium-sulfur batteries. Nat. Catal. 5, 555–563 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  14. Hua, W. X. et al. Optimizing the p charge of S in p-block metal sulfides for sulfur reduction electrocatalysis. Nat. Catal. 6, 174–184 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  15. Xu, H. F. et al. Integrating conductivity, immobility, and catalytic ability into high-N carbon/graphene sheets as an effective sulfur host. Adv. Mater. 32, 1906357 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  16. Jiang, Q. et al. Breaking the passivation effect for MnO2 catalysts in Li-S batteries by anion-cation doping. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 63, e202408474 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  17. Yao, W. Q. et al. P-doped NiTe2 with Te-vacancies in lithium-sulfur batteries prevents shuttling and promotes polysulfide conversion. Adv. Mater. 34, 2106370 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  18. Zhang, Y. et al. d-p Hybridization-induced “trapping-coupling-conversion” enables high-efficiency Nb single-atom catalysis for Li-S batteries. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 145, 1728–1739 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  19. Han, Z. Y. et al. Engineering d-p orbital hybridization in single-atom metal-embedded three-dimensional electrodes for Li-S batteries. Adv. Mater. 33, 2105947 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  20. Wang, T. et al. Heterostructures regulating lithium polysulfides for advanced lithium-sulfur batteries. Adv. Mater. 35, 2303520 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  21. Zhou, T. H. et al. Twinborn TiO2-TiN heterostructures enabling smooth trapping-diffusion-conversion of polysulfides towards ultralong life lithium-sulfur batteries. Energy Environ. Sci. 10, 1694–1703 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  22. Wang, W. et al. Atomic-level design rules of metal-cation-doped catalysts: manipulating electron affinity/ionic radius of doped cations for accelerating sulfur redox kinetics in Li-S batteries. Energy Environ. Sci. 16, 2669–2683 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  23. Zhao, C. H. et al. Highly active and stable oxygen vacancies via sulfur modification for efficient catalysis in lithium-sulfur batteries. Energy Environ. Sci. 16, 5490–5499 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  24. Xu, H. F. et al. Fundamentally manipulating the electronic structure of polar bifunctional catalysts for lithium-sulfur batteries: heterojunction design versus doping engineering. Adv. Sci. 11, 2307995 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  25. Wang, B. et al. Hafnium diboride spherical superstructure born of 5d-metal Hf-MOF-iInduced p orbital activity of B atom and enhanced kinetics of sulfur cathode reaction. Adv. Energy Mater. 13, 2300590 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  26. Zhao, C. et al. A high-energy and long-cycling lithium-sulfur pouch cell via a macroporous catalytic cathode with double-end binding sites. Nat. Nanotechnol. 16, 166–173 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  27. Guo, Y. et al. Engineering a deficient-coordinated single-atom indium electrocatalyst for fast redox conversion in practical 500 W h kg-1-level pouch lithium-sulfur batteries. Energy Environ. Sci. 16, 5274–5283 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  28. Yang, Q. et al. Chlorine bridge bond-enabled binuclear copper complex for electrocatalyzing lithium-sulfur reactions. Nat. Commun. 15, 3231 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  29. Fang, M. et al. Effective screening descriptor for MXenes to enhance sulfur reduction in lithium-sulfur batteries. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 145, 12601–12608 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  30. Yi, Z. L. et al. Uncovering electrocatalytic conversion mechanisms from Li2S2 to Li2S: generalization of computational hydrogen electrode. Energy Storage Mater. 47, 327–335 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  31. Feng, S. et al. An electrocatalytic model of the sulfur reduction reaction in lithium-sulfur batteries. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 61, e202211448 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  32. Kumar, P. et al. High-density cobalt single-atom catalysts for enhanced oxygen evolution reaction. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 145, 8052–8063 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  33. Zhang, X. et al. Developing Ni single-atom sites in carbon nitride for efficient photocatalytic H2O2 production. Nat. Commun. 14, 7115 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  34. Zhang, Z. M. et al. Probing electrolyte effects on cation-enhanced CO2 reduction on copper in acidic media. Nat. Catal. 7, 807–817 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  35. Su, L. X. et al. Insight into intermediate behaviors and design strategies of platinum group metal-based alkaline hydrogen oxidation catalysts. Adv. Mater. 37, 2414628 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  36. Sun, Y. M. et al. Spin-related electron transfer and orbital interactions in oxygen electrocatalysis. Adv. Mater. 32, 2003297 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  37. Shafirovich, V. & Lymar, S. V. Nitroxyl and its anion in aqueous solutions: Spin states, protic equilibria, and reactivities toward oxygen and nitric oxide. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 99, 7340–7345 (2002).

    Google Scholar 

  38. Ford, P. C. & Miranda, K. M. The solution chemistry of nitric oxide and other reactive nitrogen species. Nitric Oxide-Biol. Chem. 103, 31–46 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  39. Li, H. et al. Regulating the spin state configuration in bimetallic phosphorus trisulfides for promoting sulfur redox kinetics. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 145, 22516–22526 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  40. Yan, R. et al. Origin and acceleration of insoluble Li2S2-Li2S reduction catalysis in ferromagnetic atoms-based lithium-sulfur battery cathodes. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 62, 2215414 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  41. Wan, W. C. et al. Mechanistic insight into the active centers of single/dual-atom Ni/Fe-based oxygen electrocatalysts. Nat. Commun. 12, 5589 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  42. Dai, J. et al. Spin polarized Fe1-Ti pairs for highly efficient electroreduction nitrate to ammonia. Nat. Commun. 15, 88 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  43. Ren, X. et al. Spin-polarized oxygen evolution reaction under magnetic field. Nat. Commun. 12, 2608 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  44. Li, Q. et al. High spin-state modulation of catalytic centers by weak ligand field for promoting sulfur redox reaction in lithium-sulfur batteries. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 64, 2416176 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  45. Gracia, J., Sharpe, R. & Munarriz, J. Principles determining the activity of magnetic oxides for electron transfer reactions. J. Catal. 361, 331–338 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  46. Liang, Y. C. et al. Enhancement of electrocatalytic oxygen evolution by chiral molecular functionalization of hybrid 2D electrodes. Nat. Commun. 13, 3356 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  47. Sun, T. et al. Ferromagnetic single-atom spin catalyst for boosting water splitting. Nat. Nanotechnol. 18, 763–771 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  48. Meng, X. Y. et al. Distance synergy of MoS2-confined rhodium atoms for highly efficient hydrogen evolution. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 59, 10502–10507 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  49. Ge, J. M. et al. Dual-metallic single Ru and Ni atoms decoration of MoS2 for high-efficiency hydrogen production. Appl. Catal. B Environ. 298, 120557 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  50. Zhou, L. et al. Sulfur reduction reaction in lithium-sulfur batteries: mechanisms, catalysts, and characterization. Adv. Energy Mater. 12, 2202094 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  51. Han, Z. Y. et al. Machine-learning-assisted design of a binary descriptor to decipher electronic and structural effects on sulfur reduction kinetics. Nat. Catal. 6, 1073–1086 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  52. Zhao, M. et al. Redox comediation with organopolysulfides in working lithium-sulfur batteries. Chem. 6, 3297–3311 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  53. Niu, C. J. et al. High-energy lithium metal pouch cells with limited anode swelling and long stable cycles. Nat. Energy 4, 551–559 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  54. Zhao, C. et al. A high-energy and long-cycling lithium-sulfur pouch cell via a macroporous catalytic cathode with double-end binding sites. Nat. Nanotechnol. 16, 166 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  55. Huang, Y. Y. et al. Sulfur cathodes with self-organized cellulose nanofibers in stable Ah-Level, >300 Wh kg-1 lithium-sulfur cells. Adv. Energy Mater 12, 2202474 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  56. Zhao, C. X. et al. Semi-immobilized molecular electrocatalysts for high-performance lithium-sulfur batteries. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 143, 19865–19872 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  57. Shi, L. L. et al. Reaction heterogeneity in practical high-energy lithium-sulfur pouch cells. Energy Environ. Sci. 13, 3620–3632 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  58. Song, Y. W. et al. Cationic lithium polysulfides in lithium-sulfur batteries. Chem. 8, 3031–3050 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  59. Yao, W. Q. et al. Dynamic intercalation-conversion site supported ultrathin 2D mesoporous SnO2/SnSe2 hybrid as bifunctional polysulfide immobilizer and lithium regulator for lithium-sulfur chemistry. ACS Nano 16, 10783–10797 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  60. Huang, Z. M. et al. Multifunctional ultrathin Ti3C2Tx MXene@CuCo2O4 /PE separator for ultra-high-energy-density and large-capacity lithium-sulfur pouch cells. Adv. Mater. 37, 2410318 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  61. Qu, C. et al. LiNO3-free electrolyte for Li-S battery: a solvent of choice with low Ksp of polysulfide and low dendrite of lithium. Nano Energy 39, 262–272 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  62. Ye, X. Data and code for “Breaking the rate limiting barrier in lithium||sulfur batteries via spin state engineering https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18681112 (2026).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the Science and Technology Development Fund (FDCT) of Macao S.A.R (0046/2019/AFJ, 0007/2021/AGJ, 0070/2023/AFJ, and 0022/2023/RIB1), Multi-Year Research Grants (File no. MYRG-GRG2024-00166-IAPME and MYRG-GRG2025-00136-IAPME) from the Research Services and Knowledge Transfer Office at the University of Macau, the Science and Technology Innovation Committee of Shenzhen Municipality (SGCX20250526152800001), the SIAT International Joint Lab Project, Shenzhen Science and Technology Program (KQTD20221101093647058), the funding provided by Prince Mohammad Bin Fahd University, and the High-Performance Computing Cluster (HPCC) of Information and Communication Technology Office (ICTO) at University of Macau.

Author information

Author notes
  1. These authors contributed equally: Qingbin Jiang, Huifang Xu, Xinyu Ye.

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Joint Key Laboratory of the Ministry of Education, Institute of Applied Physics and Materials Engineering, University of Macau, Avenida da Universidade, Macau SAR, PR China

    Qingbin Jiang, Huifang Xu, Lingwen Liu, Kang Gao, Kaitong Sun, Haifeng Li, Yunshan Zheng, Cheng-zong Yuan, Chenyang Zha & Kwun Nam Hui

  2. Shenzhen Institutes of Advanced Technology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shenzhen, PR China

    Xinyu Ye, Lingwen Liu, Yuanmiao Sun & Hui-Ming Cheng

  3. Department of Mechanical Engineering, College of Engineering, Prince Mohammad Bin Fahd University, Al Khobar, Saudi Arabia

    Kwan San Hui

  4. Institute of Sustainability for Chemicals, Energy and Environment (ISCE2), A*STAR, Singapore, Republic of Singapore

    Chao Wu

  5. Changsha Institute of Mining and Metallurgy Testing Technology Co. Ltd, Changsha, PR China

    Zhongliang Li

  6. Fujian Key Lab Electrochem Energy Storage Mat, Fuzhou University, Fuzhou, PR China

    Mingdeng Wei

  7. Department of Chemical Physics, University of Sciences and Technology of China, Hefei, PR China

    Jie Zeng

  8. School of Chemistry & Chemical Engineering, Anhui University of Technology, Ma’anshan, PR China

    Jie Zeng & Mingkai Liu

  9. Faculty of Materials Science and Energy Engineering, Shenzhen University of Advanced Technology, Shenzhen, PR China

    Hui-Ming Cheng

  10. Shenyang National Laboratory for Materials Science, Institute of Metal Research, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shenyang, PR China

    Hui-Ming Cheng

Authors
  1. Qingbin Jiang
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Huifang Xu
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Xinyu Ye
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Lingwen Liu
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Kwan San Hui
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Chao Wu
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Kang Gao
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Kaitong Sun
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Haifeng Li
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  10. Yunshan Zheng
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  11. Cheng-zong Yuan
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  12. Zhongliang Li
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  13. Mingdeng Wei
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  14. Chenyang Zha
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  15. Jie Zeng
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  16. Mingkai Liu
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  17. Yuanmiao Sun
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  18. Hui-Ming Cheng
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  19. Kwun Nam Hui
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

K.-N.H., K.-S.H., Y.-M.S., and H.-M.C. conceived and supervised this work. Q.-B.J., H.-F.X. planned the synthesis, tested the catalysts, electrochemical data, and wrote the paper with the assistance of L.-W.L., K.G., C.-Y.Z., Y.-S.Z., M.-D.W., J.Z, M.-K.L., and C.-Z.Y. H.-F.X. and Y.-M.S. carried out theoretical calculations. X.-Y.Y. carried out the machine learning simulations. C.W. carried out XAS. Z.-L.L. tested the pouch cells. K.-T.S. and H.-F.L. carried out the temperature-dependent magnetic susceptibility measurement and the M-T data analysis. All authors participated in the analysis of experimental data and discussion of the results, as well as in the writing and revision of the manuscript.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Kwan San Hui, Yuanmiao Sun, Hui-Ming Cheng or Kwun Nam Hui.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Peer review

Peer review information

Nature Communications thanks Hao Chen, Jinjin Li and Zhipeng Ma for their contribution to the peer review of this work. A peer review file is available.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Information (download PDF )

Peer Review File (download PDF )

Description of Additional Supplementary Files (download PDF )

Supplementary Data 1-11 (download ZIP )

Source data

Source Data (download XLSX )

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if you modified the licensed material. You do not have permission under this licence to share adapted material derived from this article or parts of it. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Jiang, Q., Xu, H., Ye, X. et al. Breaking the rate limiting barrier in lithium||sulfur batteries via spin state engineering. Nat Commun (2026). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-026-70974-3

Download citation

  • Received: 15 August 2025

  • Accepted: 10 March 2026

  • Published: 24 March 2026

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-026-70974-3

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

Download PDF

Advertisement

Explore content

  • Research articles
  • Reviews & Analysis
  • News & Comment
  • Videos
  • Collections
  • Subjects
  • Follow us on Facebook
  • Follow us on X
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed

About the journal

  • Aims & Scope
  • Editors
  • Journal Information
  • Open Access Fees and Funding
  • Calls for Papers
  • Editorial Values Statement
  • Journal Metrics
  • Editors' Highlights
  • Contact
  • Editorial policies
  • Top Articles

Publish with us

  • For authors
  • For Reviewers
  • Language editing services
  • Open access funding
  • Submit manuscript

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

  • Explore articles by subject
  • Find a job
  • Guide to authors
  • Editorial policies

Nature Communications (Nat Commun)

ISSN 2041-1723 (online)

nature.com footer links

About Nature Portfolio

  • About us
  • Press releases
  • Press office
  • Contact us

Discover content

  • Journals A-Z
  • Articles by subject
  • protocols.io
  • Nature Index

Publishing policies

  • Nature portfolio policies
  • Open access

Author & Researcher services

  • Reprints & permissions
  • Research data
  • Language editing
  • Scientific editing
  • Nature Masterclasses
  • Research Solutions

Libraries & institutions

  • Librarian service & tools
  • Librarian portal
  • Open research
  • Recommend to library

Advertising & partnerships

  • Advertising
  • Partnerships & Services
  • Media kits
  • Branded content

Professional development

  • Nature Awards
  • Nature Careers
  • Nature Conferences

Regional websites

  • Nature Africa
  • Nature China
  • Nature India
  • Nature Japan
  • Nature Middle East
  • Privacy Policy
  • Use of cookies
  • Legal notice
  • Accessibility statement
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Your US state privacy rights
Springer Nature

© 2026 Springer Nature Limited

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing