Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Advertisement

Nature Communications
  • View all journals
  • Search
  • My Account Login
  • Content Explore content
  • About the journal
  • Publish with us
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed
  1. nature
  2. nature communications
  3. articles
  4. article
Piezoelectric activation of dual lattice-oxygen mechanism through OH− Grotthuss transport in water electrolysis‏
Download PDF
Download PDF
  • Article
  • Open access
  • Published: 23 March 2026

Piezoelectric activation of dual lattice-oxygen mechanism through OH− Grotthuss transport in water electrolysis‏

  • Yang Li  ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0002-9840-08591 na1,
  • Shuijing Wang1 na1,
  • Mingyue Yuan1,
  • Yu Du2,
  • Yingying Cai1,
  • Tangying Miao1,
  • Jiahui Kou  ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0003-0180-373X1,
  • Shicheng Yan  ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0002-3432-91172 &
  • …
  • Chunhua Lu1 

Nature Communications , Article number:  (2026) Cite this article

  • 1816 Accesses

  • 7 Altmetric

  • Metrics details

We are providing an unedited version of this manuscript to give early access to its findings. Before final publication, the manuscript will undergo further editing. Please note there may be errors present which affect the content, and all legal disclaimers apply.

Subjects

  • Electrocatalysis
  • Hydrogen energy

Abstract

The realization of multi-energy water oxidation systems is impeded by the challenge of integrating multiple energy inputs. Here, we overcome this limitation via ultrasonic pre-treatment of the electrolyte, which triggers a mechano-electrochemical coupling effect through piezoelectric polarization. This process promotes a Grotthuss-type OH− state that weakens O-H bonds and increases the interfacial OH− concentration, thereby influencing the electrochemical reconstruction of Ni(OH)2 to NiOOH and modifying water electrolysis pathways. These changes enhance Ni-O covalency and synergistically activate two low-energy water oxidation pathways on NiOOH involving lattice oxygen: one couples lattice oxygen with adsorbed oxygen, while the other facilitates direct lattice oxygen-oxygen coupling. Both routes bypass the high-energy *OOH intermediate typical of the conventional adsorbate evolution mechanism (*OH → *O → *OOH → O2), with the latter also avoiding *O adsorption entirely. Notably, just one minute of ultrasonic stimulation reduces the overpotential by 222 mV at 100 mA cm-2. This pulsed-energy strategy thus offers an efficient and scalable approach to realizing multi-energy-enhanced water splitting.

Similar content being viewed by others

Iron and oxygen vacancies co-modulated adsorption evolution and lattice oxygen dual-path mechanism for water oxidation

Article Open access 02 October 2025

Reserved charges in a long-lived NiOOH phase drive catalytic water oxidation

Article 15 September 2025

Sequential oxygen evolution and decoupled water splitting via electrochemical redox reaction of nickel hydroxides

Article Open access 18 October 2024

Data availability

The source data generated in this study are provided in the Source Data file. Source data are provided with this paper.

References

  1. Turner, J. A. Sustainable hydrogen production. Science 305, 972–975 (2004).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Shah, A. H. et al. The role of alkali metal cations and platinum-surface hydroxyl in the alkaline hydrogen evolution reaction. Nat. Catal. 5, 923–933 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  3. You, B. et al. Enhancing electrocatalytic water splitting by strain engineering. Adv. Mater. 31, 1807001 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Song, J. et al. A review on fundamentals for designing oxygen evolution electrocatalysts. Chem. Soc. Rev. 49, 2196–2214 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Suen, N. T. et al. Electrocatalysis for the oxygen evolution reaction: recent development and future perspectives. Chem. Soc. Rev. 46, 337–365 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Zhang, K. & Zou, R. Advanced transition metal-based OER electrocatalysts: current status, opportunities, and challenges. Small 17, 2100129 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Song, F. et al. Transition metal oxides as electrocatalysts for the oxygen evolution reaction in alkaline solutions: an application-inspired renaissance. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 140, 7748–7759 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Zhai, P. et al. Regulating electronic states of nitride/hydroxide to accelerate kinetics for oxygen evolution at large current density. Nat. Commun. 14, 1874 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Hu, C. et al. Advanced catalyst design strategies and in-situ characterization techniques for enhancing electrocatalytic activity and stability of oxygen evolution reaction. Electrochem. Energy Rev. 7, 1–20 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Hong, W. T. et al. Charge-transfer-energy-dependent oxygen evolution reaction mechanisms for perovskite oxides. Energy Environ. Sci. 10, 2190–2200 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Liao, Y. et al. Lattice distortion induced Ce-doped NiFe-LDH for efficient oxygen evolution. Chem. Eng. J. 464, 142669 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  12. Liu, R., Wang, Y., Liu, D., Zou, Y. & Wang, S. Water-plasma-enabled exfoliation of ultrathin layered double hydroxide nanosheets with multivacancies for water oxidation. Adv. Mater. 29, 1701546 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  13. Zhang, D. et al. Optimal electrocatalyst design strategies for acidic oxygen evolution. Adv. Sci. 11, 2401975 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  14. Lu, M., Du, Y., Yan, S., Yu, T. & Zou, Z. Thermally stimulated spin switching accelerates water electrolysis. Phys. Rev. Lett. 133, 258001 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  15. Lu, M., Du, Y., Yan, S., Yu, T. & Zou, Z. Thermal suppression of charge disproportionation accelerates interface electron transfer of water electrolysis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 121, e2316054120 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  16. Hu, C., Dong, Y., Shi, Q., Long, R. & Xiong, Y. Catalysis under electric-/magnetic-/electromagnetic-field coupling. Chem. Soc. Rev. 54, 524559 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  17. Xie, F., Du, Y., Lu, M., Yan, S. & Zou, Z. Thermal-stimulated spin disordering accelerates water electrolysis. Energy Environ. Sci. 18, 1972–1983 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  18. Fujishima, A. & Honda, K. Electrochemical photolysis of water at a semiconductor electrode. Nature 238, 37–38 (1972).

    Google Scholar 

  19. Garces-Pineda, F. A., Blasco-Ahicart, M., Nieto-Castro, D., Lopez, N. & Ramon Galan-Mascaros, J. Direct magnetic enhancement of electrocatalytic water oxidation in alkaline media. Nat. Energy 4, 519–525 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  20. Du, Y. et al. Continuous strain tuning of oxygen evolution catalysts with anisotropic thermal expansion. Nat. Commun. 15, 1780 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  21. Liu, D. et al. Heat-triggered ferri-to-paramagnetic transition accelerates redox couple-mediated electrocatalytic water oxidation. Adv. Funct. Mater. 32, 2111234 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  22. Marx, D., Chandra, A. & Tuckerman, M. E. Aqueous basic solutions: hydroxide solvation, structural diffusion, and comparison to the hydrated proton. Chem. Rev. 110, 2174–2216 (2010).

    Google Scholar 

  23. Li, Y. et al. Facilitating the rapid Grotthuss diffusion of OH⁻ in electrolyte for accelerated oxygen evolution reaction. J. Water Process Eng. 66, 106062 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  24. Payaka, A., Yotmanee, P. & Tongraar, A. Characteristics of the “hypercoordination” of hydroxide (OH-) in water: a comparative study of HF/MM and B3LYP/MM MD simulations. J. Mol. Liq. 188, 89–95 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  25. Kronberg, R. & Laasonen, K. Dynamics and surface propensity of H+ and OH- within rigid interfacial water: implications for electrocatalysis. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 12, 10128–10134 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  26. Chandra, A., Tuckerman, M. E. & Marx, D. Connecting solvation shell structure to proton transport kinetics in hydrogen-bonded networks via population correlation functions. Phys. Rev. Lett. 99, 145901 (2007).

    Google Scholar 

  27. Yang, Y. et al. Flexible piezoelectric pressure sensor based on polydopamine-modified BaTiO3/PVDF composite film for human motion monitoring. Sens. Actuators A Phys. 301, 111789 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  28. Kulkarni, N. D. & Kumari, P. Role of rGO on mechanical, thermal, and piezoelectric behaviour of PVDF-BTO nanocomposites for energy harvesting applications. J. Polym. Res. 30, 3449 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  29. Liu, Y. et al. Enhanced piezo-catalytic performance of BaTiO3 nanorods combining highly exposed active crystalline facets and superior deformation capability: water purification and activation mechanism. Chem. Eng. J. 488, 150768 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  30. Davis, J. G., Gierszal, K. P., Wang, P. & Ben-Amotz, D. Water structural transformation at molecular hydrophobic interfaces. Nature 491, 582–585 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  31. Wang, Y.-H. et al. In situ Raman spectroscopy reveals the structure and dissociation of interfacial water. Nature 600, 81–85 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  32. Tao, X. et al. Iron and oxygen vacancies co-modulated adsorption evolution and lattice oxygen dual-path mechanism for water oxidation. Nat. Commun. 16, 8788 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  33. Wu, F. et al. Engineering lattice oxygen regeneration of NiFe layered double hydroxide enhances oxygen evolution catalysis durability. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 64, e202413250 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  34. Bediako, D. K. et al. Structure-activity correlations in a nickel-borate oxygen evolution catalyst. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 134, 6801–6809 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  35. Lo, Y. & Hwang, B. In situ Raman studies on cathodically deposited nickel hydroxide films and electroless Ni-P electrodes in 1 M KOH solution. Langmuir 14, 944–950 (1998).

    Google Scholar 

  36. Chen, D. et al. Probing structural evolution and charge storage mechanism of NiO₂Hₓ electrode materials using in operando resonance Raman spectroscopy. Adv. Sci. 3, 1600045 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  37. Klaus, S., Cai, Y., Louie, M. W., Trotochaud, L. & Bell, A. T. Effects of Fe electrolyte impurities on Ni(OH)₂/NiOOH structure and oxygen evolution activity. J. Phys. Chem. C. 119, 7243–7254 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  38. Zhou, Y.-N., Li, F.-T., Dong, B. & Chai, Y.-M. Double self-reinforced coordination modulation constructing stable Ni4+ for water oxidation. Energy Environ. Sci. 17, 1468–1481 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  39. Yin, Z.-H. et al. Ir single atoms boost metal-oxygen covalency on selenide-derived NiOOH for direct intramolecular oxygen coupling. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 146, 6846–6855 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  40. Wu, Y. et al. Triggering lattice oxygen activation of single-atomic Mo sites anchored on Ni-Fe oxyhydroxides nanoarrays for electrochemical water oxidation. Adv. Mater. 34, 2202523 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  41. Pandya, K. I., Hoffman, R. W., McBreen, J. & O’Grady, W. E. In situ X-ray absorption spectroscopic studies of nickel oxide electrodes. J. Electrochem. Soc. 137, 383–383 (1990).

    Google Scholar 

  42. Ke, L. et al. Carbonate electrolytes manipulate lattice oxygen dynamics of oxyhydroxides toward efficient and durable water oxidation. Nat. Commun. 16, 11241 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  43. Zhang, N. & Chai, Y. Lattice oxygen redox chemistry in solid-state electrocatalysts for water oxidation. Energy Environ. Sci. 14, 4647–4671 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  44. He, L., Song, F., Cao, Y. & Chen, Q. Covalency regulation of high entropy oxyfluoride-rich metal-oxygen bond enhances high rate and long-life performance of sodium-ion batteries under high voltage. Energy Storage Mater. 80, 104370 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  45. Zhao, Y. et al. Designing local electron delocalization in 2D covalent organic frameworks for enhanced sunlight-driven photocatalytic activity. ACS Catal. 14, 3556–3564 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  46. Wang, Y. et al. Gd-induced oxygen vacancy creation activates lattice oxygen oxidation for water electrolysis. Adv. Funct. Mater. 35, 2500118 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  47. Adamu, H. et al. Tuning OER electrocatalysts toward LOM pathway through the lens of multi-descriptor feature selection by artificial intelligence-based approach. ACS Mater. Lett. 5, 299–320 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  48. Dong, H. et al. Spin magnetic effect activates dual-site intramolecular O-O bridging for nickel-iron hydroxide enhanced oxygen evolution catalysis. Adv. Sci. 12, 2415525 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  49. Li, J. et al. Activated Ni-O-Ir enhanced electron transfer for boosting oxygen evolution reaction activity of LaNi1-xIrxO3. Small 18, 2204723 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  50. Lu, Q. et al. Breaking the activity-stability trade-off of RuO2 via metallic Ru bilateral regulation for acidic oxygen evolution reaction. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 64, e202503733 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  51. Zhai, P. et al. Regulating electronic states of nitride/hydroxide to accelerate kinetics for oxygen evolution at large current density. Nat. Commun. 14, 1873 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  52. Grimaud, A. et al. Activating lattice oxygen redox reactions in metal oxides to catalyse oxygen evolution. Nat. Chem. 9, 457–465 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  53. Ren, X., Zhai, Y., Yang, N., Wang, B. & Liu, S. F. Lattice oxygen redox mechanisms in the alkaline oxygen evolution reaction. Adv. Funct. Mater. 34, 2401610 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  54. Wang, X., Zhong, H., Xi, S., Lee, W. S. V. & Xue, J. Understanding of oxygen redox in the oxygen evolution reaction. Adv. Mater. 34, 2107956 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  55. Wang, J., Wolf, R. M., Caldwell, J. W., Kollman, P. A. & Case, D. A. Development and testing of a general amber force field. J. Comput. Chem. 25, 1157–1174 (2004).

    Google Scholar 

  56. Bayly, C. I., Cieplak, P., Cornell, W. & Kollman, P. A. A well-behaved electrostatic potential based method using charge restraints for deriving atomic charges: the RESP model. J. Phys. Chem. 97, 10269–10280 (1993).

    Google Scholar 

  57. Hess, B., Kutzner, C., van der Spoel, D. & Lindahl, E. GROMACS 4: Algorithms for highly efficient, load-balanced, and scalable molecular simulation. J. Chem. Theory Comput. 4, 435–447 (2008).

    Google Scholar 

  58. Berendsen, H. J. C., Postma, J. P. M., Van Gunsteren, W. F., DiNola, A. & Haak, J. R. Molecular dynamics with coupling to an external bath. J. Chem. Phys. 81, 3684–3690 (1984).

    Google Scholar 

  59. Essmann, U., Perera, L., Berkowitz, M. L., Darden, T., Lee, H. & Pedersen, L. G. A smooth particle mesh Ewald method. J. Chem. Phys. 103, 8577–8593 (1995).

    Google Scholar 

  60. Astrakas, L. G., Gousias, C. & Tzaphlidou, M. Structural destabilization of chignolin under the influence of oscillating electric fields. J. Appl. Phys. 111, 074702 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  61. Hess, B., Bekker, H., Berendsen, H. J. C. & Fraaije, J. G. E. M. LINCS: a linear constraint solver for molecular simulations. J. Comput. Chem. 18, 1463–1472 (1997).

    Google Scholar 

  62. Van Gunsteren, W. F. & Berendsen, H. J. C. A leap-frog algorithm for stochastic dynamics. Mol. Simul. 1, 173–185 (1988).

    Google Scholar 

  63. Kresse, G. & Furthmüller, J. Efficiency of ab-initio total energy calculations for metals and semiconductors using a plane-wave basis set. Comput. Mater. Sci. 6, 15–50 (1996).

    Google Scholar 

  64. Perdew, J. P., Burke, K. & Ernzerhof, M. Generalized gradient approximation made simple. Phys. Rev. Lett. 77, 3865–3868 (1996).

    Google Scholar 

  65. Elbaz, Y., Furman, D. & Toroker, M. C. Hydrogen transfer through different crystal phases of nickel oxy/hydroxide. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 20, 25169–25178 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  66. Friebel, D. et al. Identification of highly active Fe sites in (Ni,Fe)OOH for electrocatalytic water splitting. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 137, 1305–1313 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  67. Dronskowski, R. & Blöchl, P. E. Crystal orbital Hamilton populations (COHP): energy-resolved visualization of chemical bonding in solids based on density-functional calculations. J. Phys. Chem. 97, 8617–8624 (1993).

    Google Scholar 

  68. Maintz, S., Deringer, V. L., Tchougréeff, A. L. & Dronskowski, R. LOBSTER: a tool to extract chemical bonding from plane-wave based DFT. J. Comput. Chem. 37, 1030–1035 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was primarily supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China [Grant Nos. 22409089 (Y. L.), 52272082 (J. K.), 52272217 (S. Y.), 51872135 (S. Y.), 51572121 (S. Y.) and 21633004 (S. Y.)], the Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province (No. BK20250031, J. K.), the Scientific and Technological Innovation Project of Carbon Emission Peak and Carbon Neutrality of Jiangsu Province (No. BE2022028-1, S. Y.), and the Priority Academic Program Development of Jiangsu Higher Education Institutions (PAPD, C. L.). The numerical calculations in this paper have been performed on the computing facilities in the High Performance Computing Center (HPCC) of Nanjing University.

Author information

Author notes
  1. These authors contributed equally: Yang Li, Shuijing Wang.

Authors and Affiliations

  1. College of Materials Science and Engineering, State Key Laboratory of Materials-Oriented Chemical Engineering, Jiangsu Collaborative Innovation Center for Advanced Inorganic Function Composites, Jiangsu National Synergetic Innovation Center for Advanced Materials (SICAM), Nanjing Tech University, Nanjing, PR China

    Yang Li, Shuijing Wang, Mingyue Yuan, Yingying Cai, Tangying Miao, Jiahui Kou & Chunhua Lu

  2. Collaborative Innovation Center of Advanced Microstructures, National Laboratory of Solid State Microstructures, College of Engineering and Applied Sciences, Nanjing University, Nanjing, Jiangsu, PR China

    Yu Du & Shicheng Yan

Authors
  1. Yang Li
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Shuijing Wang
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Mingyue Yuan
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Yu Du
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Yingying Cai
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Tangying Miao
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Jiahui Kou
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Shicheng Yan
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Chunhua Lu
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

Y.L., S.Y., and J.K. conceived and designed the research. C.L., J.K., and S.Y. supervised and coordinated the project. Y.L., S.W., and S.Y. wrote the manuscript with critical input from all co-authors. Y.D. performed the theoretical calculations. S.W., M.Y., Y.C., and T.M. performed the experimental work and data collection under Y.L.’s guidance. Y.L., S.W., and M.Y. conducted data analysis and interpretation. All authors participated in manuscript revision and approved the final version.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Jiahui Kou, Shicheng Yan or Chunhua Lu.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Peer review

Peer review information

Nature Communications thanks Siyu Lu, Shichun Mu, and the other anonymous reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work. A peer review file is available.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Information (download PDF )

Description of Additional Supplementary Files (download PDF )

Supplementary Data 1 (download ZIP )

Transparent Peer Review file (download PDF )

Source data

Source Data (download XLSX )

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if you modified the licensed material. You do not have permission under this licence to share adapted material derived from this article or parts of it. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Li, Y., Wang, S., Yuan, M. et al. Piezoelectric activation of dual lattice-oxygen mechanism through OH− Grotthuss transport in water electrolysis‏. Nat Commun (2026). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-026-70979-y

Download citation

  • Received: 22 September 2025

  • Accepted: 09 March 2026

  • Published: 23 March 2026

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-026-70979-y

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

Download PDF

Advertisement

Explore content

  • Research articles
  • Reviews & Analysis
  • News & Comment
  • Videos
  • Collections
  • Subjects
  • Follow us on Facebook
  • Follow us on X
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed

About the journal

  • Aims & Scope
  • Editors
  • Journal Information
  • Open Access Fees and Funding
  • Calls for Papers
  • Editorial Values Statement
  • Journal Metrics
  • Editors' Highlights
  • Contact
  • Editorial policies
  • Top Articles

Publish with us

  • For authors
  • For Reviewers
  • Language editing services
  • Open access funding
  • Submit manuscript

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

  • Explore articles by subject
  • Find a job
  • Guide to authors
  • Editorial policies

Nature Communications (Nat Commun)

ISSN 2041-1723 (online)

nature.com footer links

About Nature Portfolio

  • About us
  • Press releases
  • Press office
  • Contact us

Discover content

  • Journals A-Z
  • Articles by subject
  • protocols.io
  • Nature Index

Publishing policies

  • Nature portfolio policies
  • Open access

Author & Researcher services

  • Reprints & permissions
  • Research data
  • Language editing
  • Scientific editing
  • Nature Masterclasses
  • Research Solutions

Libraries & institutions

  • Librarian service & tools
  • Librarian portal
  • Open research
  • Recommend to library

Advertising & partnerships

  • Advertising
  • Partnerships & Services
  • Media kits
  • Branded content

Professional development

  • Nature Awards
  • Nature Careers
  • Nature Conferences

Regional websites

  • Nature Africa
  • Nature China
  • Nature India
  • Nature Japan
  • Nature Middle East
  • Privacy Policy
  • Use of cookies
  • Legal notice
  • Accessibility statement
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Your US state privacy rights
Springer Nature

© 2026 Springer Nature Limited

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing