Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Advertisement

Nature Communications
  • View all journals
  • Search
  • My Account Login
  • Content Explore content
  • About the journal
  • Publish with us
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed
  1. nature
  2. nature communications
  3. articles
  4. article
Enhanced reward coding and condition-independent dynamics in optogenetically identified corticostriatal neurons in monkeys
Download PDF
Download PDF
  • Article
  • Open access
  • Published: 03 April 2026

Enhanced reward coding and condition-independent dynamics in optogenetically identified corticostriatal neurons in monkeys

  • Adi Hovav-Lixenberg  ORCID: orcid.org/0009-0007-9334-22511,
  • Yirat Henshke  ORCID: orcid.org/0009-0006-0324-38941,
  • Tirzah Kreisel1,
  • Eran Lottem  ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0001-5852-928X1 &
  • …
  • Mati Joshua  ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0003-2602-33341 

Nature Communications , Article number:  (2026) Cite this article

We are providing an unedited version of this manuscript to give early access to its findings. Before final publication, the manuscript will undergo further editing. Please note there may be errors present which affect the content, and all legal disclaimers apply.

Subjects

  • Reward

Abstract

The basal ganglia integrate cortical inputs with dopaminergic signals to potentiate and select actions. The reward-related activity of dopamine neurons is well-studied, but the coding properties of cortical inputs to the basal ganglia remain largely unknown. We examined the activity of neurons in the frontal eye field of monkeys that were optogenetically identified as projecting to the basal ganglia. We found that the projecting neurons contained information about expected rewards and selected actions. The reward-related signal and modulations independent of task condition were stronger in optogenetically identified projecting neurons than in other neurons in the same area. These findings indicate that reward, choice, and sensorimotor information are already integrated into the cortical inputs to the basal ganglia, suggesting that the basal ganglia network integrates reward from both cortical and dopaminergic inputs rather than relying on a dopaminergic source alone.

Data availability

The data supporting the findings of this study are available at Zenodo (DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.18467078). The repository contains the curated and processed datasets required to reproduce analyses and figures reported in the paper. The raw data underlying these datasets can be provided by the corresponding author upon request. Source data are provided with this paper.

Code availability

The code used for data analysis is available from the corresponding authors upon request.

References

  1. Sutton, R. & Barto, A. Reinforcement Learning: an Introduction (MIT press, 2018).

  2. Takahashi, Y., Schoenbaum, G. & Niv, Y. Silencing the critics: understanding the effects of cocaine sensitization on dorsolateral and ventral striatum in the context of an actor/critic model. Front. Neurosci. 2, 86–99 (2008).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Doya, K. Complementary roles of basal ganglia and cerebellum in learning and motor control. Curr. Opin. Neurobiol. 10, 732–739 (2000).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Schultz, W., Dayan, P. & Montague, P. R. A neural substrate of prediction and reward. Science 275, 1593–1599 (1997).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Joshua, M., Adler, A., Mitelman, R., Vaadia, E. & Bergman, H. Midbrain dopaminergic neurons and striatal cholinergic interneurons encode the difference between reward and aversive events at different epochs of probabilistic classical conditioning trials. J. Neurosci. 28, 11673–11684 (2008).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Matsumoto, M. & Hikosaka, O. Two types of dopamine neuron distinctly convey positive and negative motivational signals. Nature 459, 837–841 (2009).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Lammel, S., Ion, D. I., Roeper, J. & Malenka, R. C. Projection-specific modulation of dopamine neuron synapses by aversive and rewarding stimuli. Neuron 70, 855–862 (2011).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Kim, H. R. et al. A unified framework for dopamine signals across timescales. Cell 183, 1600–1616.e25 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Mohebi, A., Wei, W., Pelattini, L., Kim, K. & Berke, J. D. Dopamine transients follow a striatal gradient of reward time horizons. Nat. Neurosci. 27, 737–746 (2024). 2024 27:4.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Engelhard, B. et al. Specialized coding of sensory, motor and cognitive variables in VTA dopamine neurons. Nature 570, 509–513 (2019). 2019 570:7762.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Salinas, A. G. et al. Distinct sub-second dopamine signaling in dorsolateral striatum measured by a genetically-encoded fluorescent sensor. Nat. Commun. 14, 1–16 (2023). 2023 14:1.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Turner, R. S. & DeLong, M. R. Corticostriatal Activity in Primary Motor Cortex of the Macaque. J. Neurosci. 20, 7096–7108 (2000).

    Google Scholar 

  13. Musall, S. et al. Pyramidal cell types drive functionally distinct cortical activity patterns during decision-making. Nat. Neurosci. 26, 495–505 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  14. Roesch, M. R. & Olson, C. R. Impact of expected reward on neuronal activity in prefrontal cortex, frontal and supplementary eye fields and premotor cortex. J. Neurophysiol. 90, 1766–1789 (2003).

    Google Scholar 

  15. Ding, L. & Hikosaka, O. Comparison of Reward Modulation in the Frontal Eye Field and Caudate of the Macaque. J. Neurosci. 26, 6695–6703 (2006).

    Google Scholar 

  16. Raghavan, R. T. & Joshua, M. Dissecting patterns of preparatory activity in the frontal eye fields during pursuit target selection. J. Neurophysiol. 118, 2216–2231 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  17. Lixenberg, A. & Joshua, M. Encoding of reward and decoding movement from the frontal eye field during smooth pursuit eye movements. J. Neurosci. 38, 10515–10524 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  18. Bruce, C. J. & Goldberg, M. E. Primate frontal eye fields. I. Single neurons discharging before saccades. J. Neurophysiol. 53, 603–635 (1985).

    Google Scholar 

  19. Schall, J. D. & Hanes, D. P. Neural basis of saccade target selection in frontal eye field during visual search. Nature 366, 467–469 (1993).

    Google Scholar 

  20. Parthasarathy, H. B., Schall, J. D. & Graybiel, A. M. Distributed but convergent ordering of corticostriatal projections: Analysis of the frontal eye field and the supplementary eye field in the macaque monkey. J. Neurosci. 12, 4468–4488 (1992).

    Google Scholar 

  21. Cui, D. M., Yan, Y. J. & Lynch, J. C. Pursuit subregion of the frontal eye field projects to the caudate nucleus in monkeys. J. Neurophysiol. 89, 2678–2684 (2003).

    Google Scholar 

  22. Kate, M. et al. Eye movements in monkeys with local dopamine depletion in the caudate nucleus. I. Deficits in spontaneous saccades. J. Neurosci. 15, 912–927 (1995).

    Google Scholar 

  23. Bruce, C. J., Goldberg, M. E., Bushnell, M. C. & Stanton, G. B. Primate frontal eye fields. II. Physiological and anatomical correlates of electrically evoked eye movements. J. Neurophysiol. 54, 714–734 (1985).

    Google Scholar 

  24. Schall, J. D. The neural selection and control of saccades by the frontal eye field. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B: Biol. Sci. 357, 1073–1082 (2002).

    Google Scholar 

  25. Lemon, R. Methods for neuronal recording in conscious animals. IBRO Handb. Ser. 4, 56–60 (1984).

    Google Scholar 

  26. Tervo, D. G. R. et al. A Designer AAV Variant Permits Efficient Retrograde Access to Projection. Neurons Neuron 92, 372–382 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  27. Cushnie, A. K. et al. Using rAAV2-retro in rhesus macaques: promise and caveats for circuit manipulation. J. Neurosci. Methods 345, 108859 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  28. Cohen, J. Y., Haesler, S., Vong, L., Lowell, B. B. & Uchida, N. Neuron-type-specific signals for reward and punishment in the ventral tegmental area. Nature 482, 85–88 (2012). 2012 482:7383.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Lima, S. Q., Hromádka, T., Znamenskiy, P. & Zador, A. M. PINP: a new method of tagging neuronal populations for identification during in vivo electrophysiological recording. PLoS ONE 4, e6099 (2009).

    Google Scholar 

  30. Stauffer, W. R. et al. Dopamine neuron-specific optogenetic stimulation in rhesus macaques. Cell 166, 1564–1571 e6 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  31. Larry, N., Zur, G. & Joshua, M. Organization of reward and movement signals in the basal ganglia and cerebellum. Nat. Commun. 15, 1–13 (2024). 2024 15:1.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Olejnik, S. & Algina, J. Measures of effect size for comparative studies: applications, interpretations, and limitations. Contemp. Educ. Psychol. 25, 241–286 (2000).

    Google Scholar 

  33. Siegel, M., Buschman, T. J. & Miller, E. K. Cortical information flow during flexible sensorimotor decisions. Science (1979) 348, 1352–1355 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  34. Buzsáki, G. & Mizuseki, K. The log-dynamic brain: how skewed distributions affect network operations. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 15, 264–278 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  35. Kaufman, M. T. et al. The Largest response component in the motor cortex reflects movement timing but not movement type. eNeuro 3, ENEURO.0085 (2016).

  36. Moore, T. & Armstrong, K. M. Selective gating of visual signals by microstimulation of frontal cortex. Nature 421, 370–373 (2003).

    Google Scholar 

  37. Thompson, K. G., Biscoe, K. L. & Sato, T. R. Neuronal basis of covert spatial attention in the frontal eye field. J. Neurosci. 25, 9479–9487 (2005).

    Google Scholar 

  38. Joshua, M., Tokiyama, S. & Lisberger, S. G. Interactions between target location and reward size modulate the rate of microsaccades in monkeys. J. Neurophysiol. https://doi.org/10.1152/jn.00401.2015 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  39. Glaser, J. I. et al. Role of expected reward in frontal eye field during natural scene search. J. Neurophysiol. 116, 645–657 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  40. Gurney, K., Prescott, T. J. & Redgrave, P. A computational model of action selection in the basal ganglia. I. A new functional anatomy. Biol. Cyber. 84, 401–410 (2001).

    Google Scholar 

  41. Tanaka, M. & Lisberger, S. G. Role of arcuate frontal cortex of monkeys in smooth pursuit eye movements. II. Relation to vector averaging pursuit. J. Neurophysiol. 87, 2700–2714 (2002).

    Google Scholar 

  42. Padoa-Schioppa, C. & Assad, J. A. Neurons in the orbitofrontal cortex encode economic value. Nature 441, 223–226 (2006). 2006 441:7090.

    Google Scholar 

  43. Tremblay, S. et al. An open resource for non-human primate optogenetics. Neuron 108, 1075–1090.e6 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  44. Yu, X. et al. Retrograde optogenetics reveals sensorimotor convergence within a corticotectal pathway of non-human primates. Curr. Biol. 36, 236-242 (2026).

  45. Sajad, A., Godlove, D. C. & Schall, J. D. Cortical microcircuitry of performance monitoring. Nat. Neurosci. 22, 265–274 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  46. Levy, S. et al. Cell-type-specific outcome representation in the primary motor cortex. Neuron 107, 954–971.e9 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  47. Hauser, C. K., Zhu, D., Stanford, T. R. & Salinas, E. Motor selection dynamics in FEF explain the reaction time variance of saccades to single targets. Elife 7, e33456 (2018).

  48. Schall, J. D., Hanes, D. P., Thompson, K. G. & King, D. J. Saccade target selection in frontal eye field of macaque. I. Visual and premovement activation. J. Neurosci. 15, 6905–6918 (1995).

    Google Scholar 

  49. Maunsell, J. H. R. Neuronal representations of cognitive state: Reward or attention? Trends Cogn. Sci. 8, 261–265 (2004).

    Google Scholar 

  50. Mante, V., Sussillo, D., Shenoy, K. V. & Newsome, W. T. Context-dependent computation by recurrent dynamics in prefrontal cortex. Nature 503, 78–84 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  51. Ding, L. & Gold, J. I. Neural correlates of perceptual decision making before, during, and after decision commitment in monkey frontal eye field. Cereb. Cortex 22, 1052–1067 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  52. Balewski, Z. Z., Knudsen, E. B. & Wallis, J. D. Fast and slow contributions to decision-making in corticostriatal circuits. Neuron 110, 2170–2182.e4 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  53. DeLong, M. R. Primate models of movement disorders of basal ganglia origin. Trends Neurosci. 13, 281–285 (1990).

    Google Scholar 

  54. Surmeier, D. J., Ding, J., Day, M., Wang, Z. & Shen, W. D1 and D2 dopamine-receptor modulation of striatal glutamatergic signaling in striatal medium spiny neurons. Trends Neurosci. 30, 228–235 (2007).

    Google Scholar 

  55. Rashbass, C. The relationship between saccadic and smooth tracking eye movements. J. Physiol. 159, 326–338 (1961).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This project received funding from the European Research Council (ERC) under the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation program (grant agreement No. 755745).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Edmond and Lily Safra Center for Brain Sciences (ELSC), The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem, 91904, Israel

    Adi Hovav-Lixenberg, Yirat Henshke, Tirzah Kreisel, Eran Lottem & Mati Joshua

Authors
  1. Adi Hovav-Lixenberg
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Yirat Henshke
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Tirzah Kreisel
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Eran Lottem
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Mati Joshua
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

AHL. and MJ conceived and planned the experiments. AHL and YH collected the data. TK performed preliminary experiments in mice. AHL and MJ, analyzed the data. AHL, EL and MJ interpreted the data. AHL. and MJ wrote the manuscript. All authors read, commented on, and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mati Joshua.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Peer review

Peer review information

Nature Communications thanks the anonymous reviewers for their contribution to the peer review of this work. A peer review file is available.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Information (download DOCX )

Reporting Summary (download PDF )

Transparent Peer Review file (download PDF )

Source data

Source Data (download ZIP )

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if you modified the licensed material. You do not have permission under this licence to share adapted material derived from this article or parts of it. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Hovav-Lixenberg, A., Henshke, Y., Kreisel, T. et al. Enhanced reward coding and condition-independent dynamics in optogenetically identified corticostriatal neurons in monkeys. Nat Commun (2026). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-026-71046-2

Download citation

  • Received: 23 April 2025

  • Accepted: 09 March 2026

  • Published: 03 April 2026

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-026-71046-2

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

Download PDF

Advertisement

Explore content

  • Research articles
  • Reviews & Analysis
  • News & Comment
  • Videos
  • Collections
  • Subjects
  • Follow us on Facebook
  • Follow us on X
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed

About the journal

  • Aims & Scope
  • Editors
  • Journal Information
  • Open Access Fees and Funding
  • Calls for Papers
  • Editorial Values Statement
  • Journal Metrics
  • Editors' Highlights
  • Contact
  • Editorial policies
  • Top Articles

Publish with us

  • For authors
  • For Reviewers
  • Language editing services
  • Open access funding
  • Submit manuscript

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

  • Explore articles by subject
  • Find a job
  • Guide to authors
  • Editorial policies

Nature Communications (Nat Commun)

ISSN 2041-1723 (online)

nature.com footer links

About Nature Portfolio

  • About us
  • Press releases
  • Press office
  • Contact us

Discover content

  • Journals A-Z
  • Articles by subject
  • protocols.io
  • Nature Index

Publishing policies

  • Nature portfolio policies
  • Open access

Author & Researcher services

  • Reprints & permissions
  • Research data
  • Language editing
  • Scientific editing
  • Nature Masterclasses
  • Research Solutions

Libraries & institutions

  • Librarian service & tools
  • Librarian portal
  • Open research
  • Recommend to library

Advertising & partnerships

  • Advertising
  • Partnerships & Services
  • Media kits
  • Branded content

Professional development

  • Nature Awards
  • Nature Careers
  • Nature Conferences

Regional websites

  • Nature Africa
  • Nature China
  • Nature India
  • Nature Japan
  • Nature Middle East
  • Privacy Policy
  • Use of cookies
  • Legal notice
  • Accessibility statement
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Your US state privacy rights
Springer Nature

© 2026 Springer Nature Limited

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing