Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Advertisement

Nature Communications
  • View all journals
  • Search
  • My Account Login
  • Content Explore content
  • About the journal
  • Publish with us
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed
  1. nature
  2. nature communications
  3. articles
  4. article
Microporous MOF for simultaneous high thermodynamic and kinetic synergistic separation of propylene and propane
Download PDF
Download PDF
  • Article
  • Open access
  • Published: 23 March 2026

Microporous MOF for simultaneous high thermodynamic and kinetic synergistic separation of propylene and propane

  • Xue Wang1 na1,
  • Lingxiang Bao2,3 na1,
  • Jing-Hong Li4,
  • Tao Zhao1,
  • Libo Li  ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0001-7147-98385,
  • Shuki Torii  ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0003-2143-10486,
  • Hongwei Chen5,7,
  • Takashi Kamiyama  ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0002-6359-04452,3,
  • Ping Miao  ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0003-1937-17362,3,
  • Rui-Biao Lin  ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0003-3267-220X4,
  • Banglin Chen  ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0001-8707-81158,9 &
  • …
  • Junkuo Gao  ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0001-9778-43121 

Nature Communications , Article number:  (2026) Cite this article

  • 1541 Accesses

  • Metrics details

We are providing an unedited version of this manuscript to give early access to its findings. Before final publication, the manuscript will undergo further editing. Please note there may be errors present which affect the content, and all legal disclaimers apply.

Subjects

  • Chemical engineering
  • Metal–organic frameworks

Abstract

Efficient separation of propylene from propane is a critical yet challenging industrial process. While rigid molecular sieves offer ideal selectivity, their narrow nanopores inherently constrain adsorption capacity and diffusion kinetics due to compromised thermodynamic-kinetic trade-offs. To address this, we report ZSTU-10, a molecular sieve constructed via structure-directing agents. Uniquely, ZSTU-10 features localized sieving gates for selective guest admission, expansive diffusion channels for rapid transport, and central pore cavities for high-capacity storage. This gate-channel-cavity architecture enables the precise exclusion of propane while facilitating the dense packing and fast diffusion of propylene, achieving simultaneous thermodynamic-kinetics optimization in molecular sieving. Static adsorption experiments demonstrate an exceptional propylene uptake (97.7 cm3 cm-3) at 298 K and 1 bar. Time-dependent uptake kinetics revealed a propylene diffusion coefficient (4.29 × 10-9 cm2 s-1) in ZSTU-10 surpassing benchmarks by two orders of magnitude. Dynamic breakthrough experiments demonstrate that ZSTU-10 produces high-purity propylene (99.1%) with a productivity of 37.5 L kg−1 in a single adsorption-desorption cycle.

Similar content being viewed by others

Pore configuration control in hybrid azolate ultra-microporous frameworks for sieving propylene from propane

Article 15 November 2024

Diffusion-rate sieving of propylene and propane mixtures in a cooperatively dynamic porous crystal

Article Open access 04 April 2024

Surface sieving carbon skins for propylene and propane separation

Article 05 June 2024

Data availability

The authors declare that the data supporting the findings of this study are available within the article and Supplementary Information. Crystallographic data for the structures in reported this article have been deposited at the Cambridge Crystallographic Data Center, under deposition numbers CCDC 2424397 (ZSTU-10), 2424398 (ZSTU-11), 2424396 (ZSTU-12), 2424393 (ZSTU-10a), 2424394 (ZSTU-11a), 2424395 (ZSTU-12a), 2424392 (ZSTU-10·C3D6), 2424400 (ZSTU-10b), and 2424399 (ZSTU-10c). Copies of the data can be obtained free of charge via https://www.ccdc.cam.ac.uk/structures/. The PXRD patterns, TGA curves, sorption tests, gas adsorption data, Rietveld refinement of powder X-ray diffraction tests and breakthrough tests that support the findings of this study are provided as a Source Data File (ref. 61. Xue, W (2026): Source data of ZSTU-10, ZSTU-11, and ZSTU-12 that support the findings of this study.xlsx. The source data file has been deposited in Figshare under accession code (https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.30018499). A reporting summary for this article is available as a Supplementary Information file. Source data are provided with this paper.

References

  1. Sholl, D. S. et al. Seven chemical separations to change the world. Nature 532, 435–437 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Jubinville, D. et al. A comprehensive review of global production and recycling methods of polyolefin (PO) based products and their post-recycling applications. Sustain. Mater. Techno. 25, e00188 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Park, Y.-K. et al. Catalytic cracking of lower-valued hydrocarbons for producing light olefins. Catal. Surv. Asia 14, 75–84 (2010).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Balogun, M. L. et al. Ba-Shammakh, M. S. & Hossain, M. M. CO2-assisted oxidative dehydrogenation of propane to propylene over fluidizable MoO3/La2O3-γAl2O3 catalysts. J. CO2 Util. 42, 101329 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Wang, W. et al. Tandem propane dehydrogenation and surface oxidation catalysts for selective propylene synthesis. Science 381, 886–890 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Huang, Y. et al. Delicate softness in a temperature-responsive porous crystal for accelerated sieving of propylene/propane. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 145, 24425–24432 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Wang, H. et al. Designer metal-organic frameworks for size-exclusion-based hydrocarbon separations: progress and challenges. Adv. Mater. 32, 2002603 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Tian, Y.-J. et al. Pore configuration control in hybrid azolate ultra-microporous frameworks for sieving propylene from propane. Nat. Chem. 17, 141–147 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Tian, Y.-J. et al. State of the art, challenges and prospects in metal-organic frameworks for the separation of binary propylene/propane mixtures. Coord. Chem. Rev. 506, 215697 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Ma, B. et al. A zeolitic octahedral metal oxide with ultrahigh porosity for high-temperature and high-humidity alkyne/alkene separation. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 63, 202406374 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Wang, J. et al. Pure silica with ordered silanols for propylene/propane adsorptive separation unraveled by three-dimensional electron diffraction. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 145, 6853–6860 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  12. Grande, C. A. et al. Adsorption of propane and propylene in zeolite 4A honeycomb monolith. Chem. Eng. Sci. 61, 3053–3067 (2006).

    Google Scholar 

  13. Grande, C. A. et al. Propane/propylene separation by pressure swing adsorption using zeolite 4A. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 44, 8815–8829 (2005).

    Google Scholar 

  14. Grande, C. A. et al. Adsorption kinetics of propane and propylene in zeolite 4A. Chem. Eng. Res. Des. 82, 1604–1612 (2004).

    Google Scholar 

  15. Grande, C. A. et al. Adsorption of binary mixtures of propane-propylene in carbon molecular sieve 4A. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 43, 8057–8065 (2004).

    Google Scholar 

  16. Grande, C. A. et al. Crystal size effect in vacuum pressure-swing adsorption for propane/propylene separation. Ing. Eng. Chem. Res. 43, 7557–7565 (2004).

    Google Scholar 

  17. Liu, Z. et al. Advanced carbon molecular sieve membranes derived from molecularly engineered cross-linkable copolyimide for gas separations. Nat. Mater. 22, 109–116 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  18. Du, S. et al. Probing sub-5 Ångstrom micropores in carbon for precise light olefin/paraffin separation. Nat. Commun. 14, 1197 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  19. Wang, Y. et al. Construction of fluorinated propane-trap in metal-organic frameworks for record polymer-grade propylene production under high humidity conditions. Adv. Mater. 35, 2207955 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  20. Xia, W. et al. Bioinspired recognition in metal-organic frameworks enabling precise sieving separation of fluorinated propylene and propane mixtures. Nat. Commun. 15, 8716 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  21. Xia, W. et al. Temperature-dependent molecular sieving of fluorinated propane/propylene mixtures by a flexible- robust metal- organic framework. Sci. Adv. 10, eadj6473 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  22. Bonneau, M. et al. Tunable acetylene sorption by flexible catenated metal-organic frameworks. Nat. Chem. 14, 816–822 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  23. Wang, J. et al. Optimizing pore space for flexible-robust metal–organic framework to boost trace acetylene removal. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 142, 9744–9751 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  24. Furukawa, H. et al. The chemistry and applications of metal-organic frameworks. Science 341, 1230444 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  25. Zhang, X.-W. et al. Tuning the gating energy barrier of a metal-organic framework for molecular sieving. Chem 7, 1006–1019 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  26. Wang, X. et al. Programmed pore engineering in an isoreticular triazole-MOF series for one-step ethylene separation. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 65, e22675 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  27. Bloch, E. D. et al. Hydrocarbon separations in a metal-organic framework with open iron(Ⅱ) coordination sites. Science 335, 1606–1610 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  28. Chai, Y. et al. Control of zeolite pore interior for chemoselective alkyne/olefin separations. Science 368, 1002–1006 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  29. Liu, Q. et al. Inverse CO2/C2H2 separation with MFU-4 and selectivity reversal via postsynthetic ligand exchange. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 62, e202218854 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  30. Yang, M. et al. Efficient separation of butane isomers via ZIF-8 slurry on laboratory- and pilot-scale. Nat. Commun. 13, 4792 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  31. Su, Y. et al. Separating water isotopologues using diffusion-regulatory porous materials. Nature 611, 289–294 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  32. Luo, J. et al. Kinetic sieving separation of a gating macrocyclic crystal for the purification of propylene. Chem 10, 3148–3158 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  33. Lin, J. Y. S. Molecular sieves for gas separation. Science 353, 121–122 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  34. Xie, Y. et al. Optimal binding affinity for sieving separation of propylene from propane in an oxyfluoride anion-based metal–organic framework. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 145, 2386–2394 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  35. Zeng, H. et al. Orthogonal-array dynamic molecular sieving of propylene/propane mixtures. Nature 595, 542–548 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  36. Liu, J. et al. Temperature-regulated synthesis of carbonate-pillared zinc-triazolate frameworks for precise molecular recognition. Nat. Commun. 16, 11424 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  37. Wang, H. et al. Tailor-made microporous metal-organic frameworks for the full separation of propane from propylene through selective size exclusion. Adv. Mater. 30, 1805088 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  38. Liang, B. et al. An ultramicroporous metal-organic framework for high sieving separation of propylene from propane. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 142, 17795–17801 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  39. Wang, Y. et al. Selective aerobic oxidation of a metal–organic framework boosts thermodynamic and kinetic propylene/propane selectivity. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 58, 7692–7696 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  40. Nugent, P. et al. Porous materials with optimal adsorption thermodynamics and kinetics for co2 separation. Nature 495, 80–84 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  41. Qi, D. ing et al. Exploiting equilibrium-kinetic synergetic effect for separation of ethylene and ethane in a microporous metal-organic framework. Sci. Adv. 6, eaaz4322 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  42. Huang, X. et al. Quasi-discrete pore engineering via ligand racemization in metal–organic frameworks for thermodynamic–kinetic synergistic separation of propylene and propane. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 146, 617–626 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  43. Oktavian, R. et al. Gas adsorption and framework flexibility of CALF-20 explored via experiments and simulations. Nat. Commun. 15, 3898 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  44. Wang, J. H. et al. Optimal host-guest fit in metal-organic frameworks to achieve record C2H2 packing density for trace acetylene capture. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 65, e24692 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  45. Yu, L. et al. Pore distortion in a metal-organic framework for regulated separation of propane and propylene. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 143, 19300–19305 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  46. Cadiau, A. et al. A metal-organic framework–based splitter for separating propylene from propane. Science 353, 137–140 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  47. Deng, Z. et al. Green and scalable preparation of an isomeric CALF-20 adsorbent with tailored pore size for molecular sieving of propylene from propane. Small Methods 9, 202400838 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  48. Dong, Q. et al. Confining water nanotubes in a Cu10O13-based metal–organic framework for propylene/propane separation with record-high selectivity. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 145, 8043–8051 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  49. Chen, Y. et al. Ultramicroporous hydrogen-bonded organic framework material with a thermoregulatory gating effect for record propylene separation. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 144, 17033–17040 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  50. Geier, S. J. et al. Selective adsorption of ethylene over ethane and propylene over propane in the metal-organic frameworks M2(dobdc) (M = Mg, Mn, Fe, Co, Ni, Zn). Chem. Sci. 4, 2054–2061 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  51. Ding, Q. et al. Separation of propylene and propane with a microporous metal–organic framework via equilibrium-kinetic synergetic effect. AlChE J. 67, e17094 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  52. Yuan, Y. F. et al. Wiggling mesopores kinetically amplify the adsorptive separation of propylene/propane. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 60, 19063–19067 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  53. Grande, C. A. et al. Vacuum pressure swing adsorption to produce polymer-grade propylene. Sep. Sci. Technol. 45, 1252–1259 (2010).

    Google Scholar 

  54. Chen, Y. et al. Separation of propylene and propane with pillar-layer metal–organic frameworks by exploiting thermodynamic-kinetic synergetic effect. Chem. Eng. J. 431, 133284 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  55. Grande, C. A. et al. Adsorption of propane and propylene onto carbon molecular sieve. Carbon 41, 2533–2545 (2003).

    Google Scholar 

  56. Fernandez, C. A. et al. Switching Kr/Xe selectivity with temperature in a metal–organic framework. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 134, 9046–9049 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  57. Ma, S. et al. A mesh-adjustable molecular sieve for general use in gas separation. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 46, 2458–2462 (2007).

    Google Scholar 

  58. Gu, C. et al. Design and control of gas diffusion process in a nanoporous soft crystal. Science 363, 387–391 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  59. Su, Y. et al. Diffusion-rate sieving of propylene and propane mixtures in a cooperatively dynamic porous crystal. Nat. Commun. 15, 2898 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  60. Cui, J. et al. A molecular sieve with ultrafast adsorption kinetics for propylene separation. Science 383, 179–183 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  61. Wang, X. et al. Source data of ZSTU-10, ZSTU-11, and ZSTU-12 that support the findings of this study. Data sets. figshare https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.30018499 (2026).

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 22378366 (J.G.), 22375221 (R.B.L.) and W2431013 (B.C.)), the Outstanding Graduate Thesis Development Fund (No. LW-YP2024006 (X.W.)), the Guangdong Basic and Applied Basic Research Foundation (No. 2023B0303000003 (P. M.), 2023A1515110785 (L. X. B.), 2023B1515120060 (P. M.), 2024B1515120045 (P. M.)), and Guangdong Innovative & Entrepreneurial Research Team Program (2021ZT09C539 (P. M.)). The authors appreciate the neutron beamtime at SuperHRPD of J-PARC (Proposal No.2022B0332) and TREND at the CSNS. The authors thank Prof. Kazuhiro Mori, Dr. Toru Ishigaki, Dr. Zhenhong Tan, Dr. Wu Xie, and Dr. Wenhai Ji for their kind support on the neutron scattering experiments.

Author information

Author notes
  1. These authors contributed equally: Xue Wang, Lingxiang Bao.

Authors and Affiliations

  1. China-Uzbekistan Joint Laboratory on Advanced Porous Materials, State Key Laboratory of Bio-based Fiber Materials, School of Materials Science and Engineering, Zhejiang Sci-Tech University, Hangzhou, China

    Xue Wang, Tao Zhao & Junkuo Gao

  2. Spallation Neutron Source Science Center, Dongguan, China

    Lingxiang Bao, Takashi Kamiyama & Ping Miao

  3. Institute of High Energy Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China

    Lingxiang Bao, Takashi Kamiyama & Ping Miao

  4. MOE Key Laboratory of Bioinorganic and Synthetic Chemistry, GBRCE for Functional Molecular Engineering, School of Chemistry, IGCME, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, China

    Jing-Hong Li & Rui-Biao Lin

  5. College of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Taiyuan University of Technology, Taiyuan, China

    Libo Li & Hongwei Chen

  6. Institute of Materials Structure Science, High Energy Accelerator Research Organization (KEK), Tokai, Ibaraki, Japan

    Shuki Torii

  7. State Key Laboratory of Porous Materials for Separation and Conversion, Southwest Institute of Chemical Co., Ltd, Chengdu, China

    Hongwei Chen

  8. Fujian Provincial Key Laboratory of Polymer Materials, College of Chemistry and Materials Science, Fujian Normal University, Fuzhou, China

    Banglin Chen

  9. Key Laboratory of the Ministry of Education for Advanced Catalysis Materials, College of Chemistry and Materials Science, Zhejiang Normal University, Jinhua, China

    Banglin Chen

Authors
  1. Xue Wang
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Lingxiang Bao
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Jing-Hong Li
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Tao Zhao
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Libo Li
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Shuki Torii
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Hongwei Chen
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Takashi Kamiyama
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Ping Miao
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  10. Rui-Biao Lin
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  11. Banglin Chen
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  12. Junkuo Gao
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

X.W. performed the experiments associated with material synthesis, data analysis and prepared the first version of the manuscript. L.B. refined the single-crystal X-ray diffraction data and revised the manuscript. L.B., S.T., T.K., and P.M. performed the neutron powder diffraction experiments and related data analysis. T.Z. performed the gas adsorption experiments. H.C. and L.L. measured the fixed-bed breakthrough tests. X.W., T.Z., and J.L. analyzed the structural data. P.M., R.-B.L., B.C., and J.G. directed and supervised the project. J.G. conceived and designed the research. All authors discussed the results and commented on the manuscript.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Ping Miao, Rui-Biao Lin, Banglin Chen or Junkuo Gao.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Peer review

Peer review information

Nature Communications thanks Xiu-Yuan Li, Weishen Yang and the other anonymous reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work. A peer review file is available.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Information file (download PDF )

Transparent Peer Review file (download PDF )

Source data

Source data (download ZIP )

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if you modified the licensed material. You do not have permission under this licence to share adapted material derived from this article or parts of it. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wang, X., Bao, L., Li, JH. et al. Microporous MOF for simultaneous high thermodynamic and kinetic synergistic separation of propylene and propane. Nat Commun (2026). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-026-71104-9

Download citation

  • Received: 10 September 2025

  • Accepted: 12 March 2026

  • Published: 23 March 2026

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-026-71104-9

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

Download PDF

Advertisement

Explore content

  • Research articles
  • Reviews & Analysis
  • News & Comment
  • Videos
  • Collections
  • Subjects
  • Follow us on Facebook
  • Follow us on X
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed

About the journal

  • Aims & Scope
  • Editors
  • Journal Information
  • Open Access Fees and Funding
  • Calls for Papers
  • Editorial Values Statement
  • Journal Metrics
  • Editors' Highlights
  • Contact
  • Editorial policies
  • Top Articles

Publish with us

  • For authors
  • For Reviewers
  • Language editing services
  • Open access funding
  • Submit manuscript

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

  • Explore articles by subject
  • Find a job
  • Guide to authors
  • Editorial policies

Nature Communications (Nat Commun)

ISSN 2041-1723 (online)

nature.com footer links

About Nature Portfolio

  • About us
  • Press releases
  • Press office
  • Contact us

Discover content

  • Journals A-Z
  • Articles by subject
  • protocols.io
  • Nature Index

Publishing policies

  • Nature portfolio policies
  • Open access

Author & Researcher services

  • Reprints & permissions
  • Research data
  • Language editing
  • Scientific editing
  • Nature Masterclasses
  • Research Solutions

Libraries & institutions

  • Librarian service & tools
  • Librarian portal
  • Open research
  • Recommend to library

Advertising & partnerships

  • Advertising
  • Partnerships & Services
  • Media kits
  • Branded content

Professional development

  • Nature Awards
  • Nature Careers
  • Nature Conferences

Regional websites

  • Nature Africa
  • Nature China
  • Nature India
  • Nature Japan
  • Nature Middle East
  • Privacy Policy
  • Use of cookies
  • Legal notice
  • Accessibility statement
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Your US state privacy rights
Springer Nature

© 2026 Springer Nature Limited

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing