Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Advertisement

Nature Communications
  • View all journals
  • Search
  • My Account Login
  • Content Explore content
  • About the journal
  • Publish with us
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed
  1. nature
  2. nature communications
  3. articles
  4. article
Single-cell phenotypic heterogeneity shapes quorum signaling dynamics in Pseudomonas aeruginosa
Download PDF
Download PDF
  • Article
  • Open access
  • Published: 31 March 2026

Single-cell phenotypic heterogeneity shapes quorum signaling dynamics in Pseudomonas aeruginosa

  • Danielle G. Lange  ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0001-7622-81141,
  • Vadim Litvinov  ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0003-3287-41431 &
  • Daniel Dar  ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0002-6650-54881 

Nature Communications , Article number:  (2026) Cite this article

  • 325 Accesses

  • Metrics details

We are providing an unedited version of this manuscript to give early access to its findings. Before final publication, the manuscript will undergo further editing. Please note there may be errors present which affect the content, and all legal disclaimers apply.

Subjects

  • Bacterial systems biology
  • Microbial communities
  • Pathogens
  • Transcriptomics

Abstract

Quorum sensing (QS) coordinates collective bacterial behavior, yet how individuality arises within a system built to unify action remains unclear. Using imaging-transcriptomics, we profile the QS response of Pseudomonas aeruginosa at single-cell resolution and uncover heterogeneity across all stages of QS. We find that most cells cooperate, but their contributions vary widely due to transcriptional noise. In contrast, expression of QS signal synthases, particularly in the Las and PQS systems, shows extreme cell-cell variability indicative of active differentiation. We show that cellular memory from prior growth cycles shapes QS dynamics by generating signaling-primed cells, yet it does not influence the de novo formation of hypersignaling cells. This differentiation is robust to exogenous autoinducers and conserved across diverse lab and clinical isolates. Together, our findings reveal a deliberately heterogeneous entry point embedded within an otherwise synchronizing program, shedding light on how individuality shapes cooperation and conflict in bacterial populations.

Data availability

Source data are provided with this paper and were also deposited in figshare (https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.30752288). Source data are provided in this paper.

Code availability

The code used in the study was deposited in figshare (https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.30752288).

References

  1. Whiteley, M., Diggle, S. P. & Greenberg, E. P. Progress in and promise of bacterial quorum sensing research. Nature 551, 313–320 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Abisado, R. G., Benomar, S., Klaus, J. R., Dandekar, A. A. & Chandler, J. R. Bacterial quorum sensing and microbial community interactions. MBio 9, https://doi.org/10.1128/mbio.02331-17 (2018).

  3. Papenfort, K. & Bassler, B. L. Quorum sensing signal-response systems in Gram-negative bacteria. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 14, 576–588 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Rattray, J. B. et al. Bacterial quorum sensing allows graded and bimodal cellular responses to variations in population density. MBio. 13, e0074522 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Jayakumar, P., Thomas, S. A., Brown, S. P. & Kümmerli, R. Collective decision-making in Pseudomonas aeruginosa involves transient segregation of quorum-sensing activities across cells. Curr. Biol. 32, 5250–5261 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Ackermann, M. A functional perspective on phenotypic heterogeneity in microorganisms. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 13, 497–508 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Elowitz, M. B., Levine, A. J., Siggia, E. D. & Swain, P. S. Stochastic gene expression in a single cell. Science 297, 1183–1186 (2002).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Eldar, A. & Elowitz, M. B. Functional roles for noise in genetic circuits. Nature 467, 167–173 (2010).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Veening, J.-W., Smits, W. K. & Kuipers, O. P. Bistability, epigenetics, and bet-hedging in bacteria. Annu. Rev. Microbiol. 62, 193–210 (2008).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Diggle, S. P., Griffin, A. S., Campbell, G. S. & West, S. A. Cooperation and conflict in quorum-sensing bacterial populations. Nature 450, 411–414 (2007).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Ruparell, A. et al. The fitness burden imposed by synthesising quorum sensing signals. Sci. Rep. 6, 33101 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  12. Mund, A., Diggle, S. P. & Harrison, F. The fitness of Pseudomonas aeruginosa quorum sensing signal cheats is influenced by the diffusivity of the environment. MBio 8, e00353–17 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  13. Striednig, B. & Hilbi, H. Bacterial quorum sensing and phenotypic heterogeneity: how the collective shapes the individual. Trends Microbiol. 30, 379–389 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  14. Bettenworth, V. et al. Phenotypic heterogeneity in bacterial quorum sensing systems. J. Mol. Biol. 431, 4530–4546 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  15. Miranda, S. W., Asfahl, K. L., Dandekar, A. A. & Greenberg, E. P. Pseudomonas aeruginosa quorum sensing. in Pseudomonas Aeruginosa: Biology, Pathogenesis and Control Strategies (Springer International Publishing, Cham, 2022).

  16. Lee, J. & Zhang, L. The hierarchy quorum sensing network in Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Protein Cell 6, 26–41 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  17. Dar, D., Dar, N., Cai, L. & Newman, D. K. Spatial transcriptomics of planktonic and sessile bacterial populations at single-cell resolution. Science 373, https://doi.org/10.1126/science.abi4882 (2021).

  18. Schuster, M., Lostroh, C. P., Ogi, T. & Greenberg, E. P. Identification, timing, and signal specificity of Pseudomonas aeruginosa quorum-controlled genes: a transcriptome analysis. J. Bacteriol. 185, 2066–2079 (2003).

    Google Scholar 

  19. Wagner, V. E., Bushnell, D., Passador, L., Brooks, A. I. & Iglewski, B. H. Microarray analysis of Pseudomonas aeruginosa quorum-sensing regulons: Effects of growth phase and environment. J. Bacteriol. 185, 2080–2095 (2003).

    Google Scholar 

  20. Klumpp, S., Zhang, Z. & Hwa, T. Growth rate-dependent global effects on gene expression in bacteria. Cell 139, 1366–1375 (2009).

    Google Scholar 

  21. Chen, H., Shiroguchi, K., Ge, H. & Xie, X. S. Genome-wide study of mRNA degradation and transcript elongation in Escherichia coli. Mol. Syst. Biol. 11, 808 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  22. Mellini, M. et al. RsaL-driven negative regulation promotes heterogeneity in Pseudomonas aeruginosa quorum sensing. MBio e0203923 https://doi.org/10.1128/mbio.02039-23 (2023).

  23. Pesci, E. C., Pearson, J. P., Seed, P. C. & Iglewski, B. H. Regulation of las and rhl quorum sensing in Pseudomonas aeruginosa. J. Bacteriol. 179, 3127–3132 (1997).

    Google Scholar 

  24. Schuster, M., Li, C., Smith, P. & Kuttler, C. Parameters, architecture and emergent properties of the Pseudomonas aeruginosa LasI/LasR quorum-sensing circuit. J. R. Soc. Interface 20, 20220825 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  25. Venturi, V. Regulation of quorum sensing in Pseudomonas. FEMS Microbiol. Rev. 30, 274–291 (2006).

    Google Scholar 

  26. Urchueguía, A. et al. Genome-wide gene expression noise in Escherichia coli is condition-dependent and determined by propagation of noise through the regulatory network. PLoS Biol. 19, e3001491 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  27. Silander, O. K. et al. A genome-wide analysis of promoter-mediated phenotypic noise in Escherichia coli. PLoS Genet. 8, e1002443 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  28. Taniguchi, Y. et al. Quantifying E. coli proteome and transcriptome with single-molecule sensitivity in single cells. Science 329, 533–538 (2010).

    Google Scholar 

  29. Laventie, B.-J. et al. A surface-induced asymmetric program promotes tissue colonization by pseudomonas aeruginosa. Cell Host Microbe 25, 140–152.e6 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  30. Lin, C. K., Lee, D. S. W., McKeithen-Mead, S., Emonet, T. & Kazmierczak, B. A primed subpopulation of bacteria enables rapid expression of the type 3 secretion system in Pseudomonas aeruginosa. MBio 12, e0083121 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  31. Martin, D. W., Schurr, M. J., Yu, H. & Deretic, V. Analysis of promoters controlled by the putative sigma factor AlgU regulating conversion to mucoidy in Pseudomonas aeruginosa: relationship to sigma E and stress response. J. Bacteriol. 176, 6688–6696 (1994).

    Google Scholar 

  32. Rampioni, G. et al. RsaL provides quorum sensing homeostasis and functions as a global regulator of gene expression in Pseudomonas aeruginosa: RsaL and quorum sensing homeostasis. Mol. Microbiol. 66, 1557–1565 (2007).

    Google Scholar 

  33. Chugani, S. et al. Strain-dependent diversity in the Pseudomonas aeruginosa quorum-sensing regulon. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 109, E2823–E2831 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  34. Ostovar, G. & Boedicker, J. Q. Phenotypic memory in quorum sensing. PLoS Comput. Biol. 20, e1011696 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  35. Pradhan, B. B. & Chatterjee, S. Reversible non-genetic phenotypic heterogeneity in bacterial quorum sensing. Mol. Microbiol. 92, 557–569 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  36. Garmyn, D. et al. Evidence of autoinduction heterogeneity via expression of the Agr system of Listeria monocytogenes at the single-cell level. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 77, 6286–6289 (2011).

    Google Scholar 

  37. Bischofs, I. B., Hug, J. A., Liu, A. W., Wolf, D. M. & Arkin, A. P. Complexity in bacterial cell-cell communication: quorum signal integration and subpopulation signaling in the Bacillus subtilis phosphorelay. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 106, 6459–6464 (2009).

    Google Scholar 

  38. Kotte, O., Volkmer, B., Radzikowski, J. L. & Heinemann, M. Phenotypic bistability in Escherichia coli’s central carbon metabolism. Mol. Syst. Biol. 10, 736 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  39. Kaplan, Y. et al. Observation of universal ageing dynamics in antibiotic persistence. Nature 600, 290–294 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  40. Sappington, K. J., Dandekar, A. A., Oinuma, K.-I. & Greenberg, E. P. Reversible signal binding by the Pseudomonas aeruginosa quorum-sensing signal receptor LasR. MBio 2, e00011–e00011 (2011).

    Google Scholar 

  41. Bettenworth, V. et al. Frequency modulation of a bacterial quorum sensing response. Nat. Commun. 13, 2772 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  42. Keller, L. & Surette, M. G. Communication in bacteria: an ecological and evolutionary perspective. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 4, 249–258 (2006).

    Google Scholar 

  43. Boedicker, J. Q., Vincent, M. E. & Ismagilov, R. F. Microfluidic confinement of single cells of bacteria in small volumes initiates high-density behavior of quorum sensing and growth and reveals its variability. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed Engl. 48, 5908–5911 (2009).

    Google Scholar 

  44. Anetzberger, C., Schell, U. & Jung, K. Single cell analysis of Vibrio harveyi uncovers functional heterogeneity in response to quorum sensing signals. BMC Microbiol. 12, 209 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  45. Redfield, R. J. Is quorum sensing a side effect of diffusion sensing? Trends Microbiol. 10, 365–370 (2002).

    Google Scholar 

  46. Cárcamo-Oyarce, G., Lumjiaktase, P., Kümmerli, R. & Eberl, L. Quorum sensing triggers the stochastic escape of individual cells from Pseudomonas putida biofilms. Nat. Commun. 6, 5945 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  47. Nadell, C. D., Drescher, K. & Foster, K. R. Spatial structure, cooperation and competition in biofilms. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 14, 589–600 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  48. McNulty, R. et al. Probe-based bacterial single-cell RNA sequencing predicts toxin regulation. Nat. Microbiol. 8, 934–945 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  49. Kuchina, A. et al. Microbial single-cell RNA sequencing by split-pool barcoding. Science 371, https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aba5257 (2021).

  50. Imdahl, F., Vafadarnejad, E., Homberger, C., Saliba, A.-E. & Vogel, J. Single-cell RNA-sequencing reports growth-condition-specific global transcriptomes of individual bacteria. Nat. Microbiol. 5, 1202–1206 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  51. Blattman, S. B., Jiang, W., Oikonomou, P. & Tavazoie, S. Prokaryotic single-cell RNA sequencing by in situ combinatorial indexing. Nat. Microbiol. 5, 1192–1201 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  52. Sarfatis, A., Wang, Y., Twumasi-Ankrah, N. & Moffitt, J. R. Highly multiplexed spatial transcriptomics in bacteria. Science 387, eadr0932 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  53. Oshri, R. D., Zrihen, K. S., Shner, I., Omer Bendori, S. & Eldar, A. Selection for increased quorum-sensing cooperation in Pseudomonas aeruginosa through the shut-down of a drug resistance pump. ISME J. 12, 2458–2469 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  54. Lombardi, C. et al. Structural and Functional Characterization of the Type Three Secretion System (T3SS) Needle of Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Front. Microbiol. 10, 573 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  55. Choi, K.-H. et al. A Tn7-based broad-range bacterial cloning and expression system. Nat. Methods 2, 443–448 (2005).

    Google Scholar 

  56. Fraikin, N., Couturier, A., Mercier, R. & Lesterlin, C. A palette of bright and photostable monomeric fluorescent proteins for bacterial time-lapse imaging. Sci. Adv. 11, eads6201 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  57. Choi, K.-H., Kumar, A. & Schweizer, H. P. A 10-min method for preparation of highly electrocompetent Pseudomonas aeruginosa cells: application for DNA fragment transfer between chromosomes and plasmid transformation. J. Microbiol. Methods 64, 391–397 (2006).

    Google Scholar 

  58. Pachitariu, M. & Stringer, C. Cellpose 2.0: how to train your own model. Nat. Methods 19, 1634–1641 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank Dianne Newman, Avigdor Eldar, David Zeevi, Roy Jacobson, Irit Sherman, Nadav Hen and Zohar Persky for critically reading and commenting on the manuscript. We thank Zohar Persky for assistance and support with par-seqFISH. We also thank Avigdor Eldar for the P. aeruginosa PAO1 PG strain and Viviana Job for the CHA isolate. D.D. was supported by the ERC-StG program (grant no. 101117863) and the Israel Science Foundation (personal grant 2227/22).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Plant and Environmental Sciences, Weizmann Institute of Science, Rehovot, Israel

    Danielle G. Lange, Vadim Litvinov & Daniel Dar

Authors
  1. Danielle G. Lange
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Vadim Litvinov
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Daniel Dar
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

D.D. and D.G.L. conceived the study. Experiments were carried out by D.G.L. and computational analysis performed by D.G.L. and V.L. The manuscript was written and revised by D.D. and D.G.L. D.D. supervised the work.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Daniel Dar.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Peer review

Peer review information

Nature Communications thanks Antoine-Emmanuel Saliba and the other anonymous reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work. A peer review file is available.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Supplementary information (download PDF )

Description of Additional Supplementary File (download PDF )

Supplementary Dataset 1 (download XLSX )

Supplementary Dataset 2 (download XLSX )

Supplementary Dataset 3 (download XLSX )

Supplementary Dataset 4 (download XLSX )

Reporting summary (download PDF )

Transparent Peer Review file (download PDF )

Source data

Source data per panel (download XLSX )

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if you modified the licensed material. You do not have permission under this licence to share adapted material derived from this article or parts of it. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Lange, D.G., Litvinov, V. & Dar, D. Single-cell phenotypic heterogeneity shapes quorum signaling dynamics in Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Nat Commun (2026). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-026-71109-4

Download citation

  • Received: 25 June 2025

  • Accepted: 12 March 2026

  • Published: 31 March 2026

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-026-71109-4

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

Download PDF

Advertisement

Explore content

  • Research articles
  • Reviews & Analysis
  • News & Comment
  • Videos
  • Collections
  • Subjects
  • Follow us on Facebook
  • Follow us on X
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed

About the journal

  • Aims & Scope
  • Editors
  • Journal Information
  • Open Access Fees and Funding
  • Calls for Papers
  • Editorial Values Statement
  • Journal Metrics
  • Editors' Highlights
  • Contact
  • Editorial policies
  • Top Articles

Publish with us

  • For authors
  • For Reviewers
  • Language editing services
  • Open access funding
  • Submit manuscript

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

  • Explore articles by subject
  • Find a job
  • Guide to authors
  • Editorial policies

Nature Communications (Nat Commun)

ISSN 2041-1723 (online)

nature.com footer links

About Nature Portfolio

  • About us
  • Press releases
  • Press office
  • Contact us

Discover content

  • Journals A-Z
  • Articles by subject
  • protocols.io
  • Nature Index

Publishing policies

  • Nature portfolio policies
  • Open access

Author & Researcher services

  • Reprints & permissions
  • Research data
  • Language editing
  • Scientific editing
  • Nature Masterclasses
  • Research Solutions

Libraries & institutions

  • Librarian service & tools
  • Librarian portal
  • Open research
  • Recommend to library

Advertising & partnerships

  • Advertising
  • Partnerships & Services
  • Media kits
  • Branded content

Professional development

  • Nature Awards
  • Nature Careers
  • Nature Conferences

Regional websites

  • Nature Africa
  • Nature China
  • Nature India
  • Nature Japan
  • Nature Middle East
  • Privacy Policy
  • Use of cookies
  • Legal notice
  • Accessibility statement
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Your US state privacy rights
Springer Nature

© 2026 Springer Nature Limited

Nature Briefing Microbiology

Sign up for the Nature Briefing: Microbiology newsletter — what matters in microbiology research, free to your inbox weekly.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing: Microbiology