Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Advertisement

Nature Communications
  • View all journals
  • Search
  • My Account Login
  • Content Explore content
  • About the journal
  • Publish with us
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed
  1. nature
  2. nature communications
  3. articles
  4. article
Determinants of chromosome-specific telomere lengths among 2573 All of Us participants
Download PDF
Download PDF
  • Article
  • Open access
  • Published: 28 March 2026

Determinants of chromosome-specific telomere lengths among 2573 All of Us participants

  • Niyati Jain1,2,
  • Jiajun Luo3,
  • Yuqing Yang  ORCID: orcid.org/0009-0006-8764-46864,
  • Kathryn Demanelis5,6,
  • Habibul Ahsan1,4,7,
  • Briseis Aschebrook-Kilfoy4,7,
  • Lin S. Chen1 &
  • …
  • Brandon L. Pierce1,2,7,8 

Nature Communications (2026) Cite this article

  • 4836 Accesses

  • 1 Citations

  • 14 Altmetric

  • Metrics details

We are providing an unedited version of this manuscript to give early access to its findings. Before final publication, the manuscript will undergo further editing. Please note there may be errors present which affect the content, and all legal disclaimers apply.

Subjects

  • Bioinformatics
  • Genome
  • Genomic instability
  • Telomeres

Abstract

Telomere length is a biomarker of aging and disease risk. Most human studies have assessed average telomere length, limiting our understanding of variability across chromosome arms. Using long-read sequencing data from >2500 All of Us participants, we estimate chromosome-specific telomere lengths and characterize sources of biological and technical variation. Telomere length varies by chromosome arm, accounting for 9.1% of total variance. Substantial variance (8.9%) in chromosome-specific telomere lengths is attributable to individual, independent of age, suggesting that inter-individual differences in length are established at birth and maintained through life. Age is inversely associated with length for all arms, but longer arms show stronger association. We demonstrate that chromosome-specific telomere estimates enable analysis of disease associations for individual telomeres and for individuals’ shortest telomere. Overall, this work highlights the utility of long-read sequencing for population-scale analysis of chromosome-specific telomere lengths and provides a framework to guide future studies.

Similar content being viewed by others

Genetic architecture of telomere length in 462,666 UK Biobank whole-genome sequences

Article Open access 27 August 2024

High resolution long-read telomere sequencing reveals dynamic mechanisms in aging and cancer

Article Open access 18 June 2024

Telomere function and regulation from mouse models to human ageing and disease

Article 29 November 2024

Data availability

The data generated in this study, including the chromosome-specific TLs from Telogator2 and TelSeq TLs, have been deposited in the community workspace titled Jain_et_al_csTL_Nature_Comm, accessed within the featured workspace collection of the All of Us Researcher Workbench (https://support.researchallofus.org/hc/en-us/articles/360059633052-Featured-Workspaces). Access to this data is available to researchers affiliated with institutions that have signed a Data Use agreement with the All of Us Research program and who have obtained controlled tier access (https://www.researchallofus.org/register/). Supplementary Data 10 includes the list of Human Pangenome Reference Consortium samples analyzed, along with links for accessing the data.

Code availability

The code used to generate chromosome-specific telomere length estimates with Telogator2 is available on GitHub: https://github.com/niyati1211/All-of-Us-chromosome-specific-telomere-lengths84. The code used to produce the main Figures and Supplementary Figs. have been deposited in the community workspace titled Jain_et_al_csTL_Nature_Comm, accessed within the featured workspace collection of the All of Us Researcher Workbench.

References

  1. Blackburn, E. H., Epel, E. S. & Lin, J. Human telomere biology: a contributory and interactive factor in aging, disease risks, and protection. Science 350, 1193–1198 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  2. López-Otín, C., Blasco, M. A., Partridge, L., Serrano, M. & Kroemer, G. The hallmarks of aging. Cell 153, 1194–1217 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Demanelis, K. et al. Determinants of telomere length across human tissues. Science 369, eaaz6876 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Mangino, M. et al. Genome-wide meta-analysis points to CTC1 and ZNF676 as genes regulating telomere homeostasis in humans. Hum. Mol. Genet. 21, 5385–5394 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Li, C. et al. Genome-wide association analysis in humans links nucleotide metabolism to leukocyte telomere length. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 106, 389–404 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Taub, M. A. et al. Genetic determinants of telomere length from 109,122 ancestrally diverse whole-genome sequences in TOPMed. Cell Genom. 2, 100084 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Dorajoo, R. et al. Loci for human leukocyte telomere length in the Singaporean Chinese population and trans-ethnic genetic studies. Nat. Commun. 10, 2491 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Burren, O. S. et al. Genetic architecture of telomere length in 462,666 UK Biobank whole-genome sequences. Nat. Genet. 56, 1832–1840 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Codd, V. et al. Identification of seven loci affecting mean telomere length and their association with disease. Nat. Genet. 45, 422–427 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Delgado, D. A. et al. The contribution of parent-to-offspring transmission of telomeres to the heritability of telomere length in humans. Hum. Genet. 138, 49–60 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Epel, E. S. et al. Accelerated telomere shortening in response to life stress. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 101, 17312–17315 (2004).

    Google Scholar 

  12. Assavanopakun, P., Sapbamrer, R., Kumfu, S., Chattipakorn, N. & Chattipakorn, S. C. Effects of air pollution on telomere length: evidence from in vitro to clinical studies. Environ. Pollut. 312, 120096 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  13. Astuti, Y., Wardhana, A., Watkins, J. & Wulaningsih, W. Cigarette smoking and telomere length: A systematic review of 84 studies and meta-analysis. Environ. Res. 158, 480–489 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  14. Mirabello, L. et al. The association between leukocyte telomere length and cigarette smoking, dietary and physical variables, and risk of prostate cancer. Aging Cell 8, 405–413 (2009).

    Google Scholar 

  15. Müezzinler, A. et al. Smoking habits and leukocyte telomere length dynamics among older adults: Results from the ESTHER cohort. Exp. Gerontol. 70, 18–25 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  16. Rossiello, F., Jurk, D., Passos, J. F. & d’Adda di Fagagna, F. Telomere dysfunction in ageing and age-related diseases. Nat. Cell Biol. 24, 135–147 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  17. Rode, L., Nordestgaard, B. G. & Bojesen, S. E. Peripheral blood leukocyte telomere length and mortality among 64 637 individuals from the general population. J. Natl. Cancer Inst. 107, djv074 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  18. Anic, G. M. et al. Telomere length and risk of melanoma, squamous cell carcinoma, and basal cell carcinoma. Cancer Epidemiol. 37, 434–439 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  19. Rode, L., Nordestgaard, B. G. & Bojesen, S. E. Long telomeres and cancer risk among 95 568 individuals from the general population. Int. J. Epidemiol. 45, 1634–1643 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  20. Xu, Z., Duc, K. D., Holcman, D. & Teixeira, M. T. The length of the shortest telomere as the major determinant of the onset of replicative senescence. Genetics 194, 847–857 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  21. Berardi, P. et al. Both genome instability and replicative senescence stem from the shortest telomere in telomerase-negative cells. Nat. Commun. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-026-70352-z (2026).

  22. Abdallah, P. et al. A two step model for senescence triggered by a single critically short telomere. Nat. Cell Biol. 11, 988–993 (2009).

    Google Scholar 

  23. Hemann, M. T., Strong, M. A., Hao, L. Y. & Greider, C. W. The shortest telomere, not average telomere length, is critical for cell viability and chromosome stability. Cell 107, 67–77 (2001).

    Google Scholar 

  24. Fragkiadaki, P. et al. The Association between Short Telomere Length and Cardiovascular Disease. Cytogenet. Genome Res. 164, 202–210 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  25. Hwang, S. M. et al. Short telomere length and its correlation with gene mutations in myelodysplastic syndrome. J. Hematol. Oncol. 9, 62 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  26. Shin, D. Y. et al. The importance of critically short telomere in myelodysplastic syndrome. Biomark. Res. 10, 79 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  27. O’Callaghan, N. J. & Fenech, M. A quantitative PCR method for measuring absolute telomere length. Biol. Proced. Online 13, 3 (2011).

    Google Scholar 

  28. Cawthon, R. M. Telomere measurement by quantitative PCR. Nucleic Acids Res. 30, e47 (2002).

    Google Scholar 

  29. Kimura, M. et al. Measurement of telomere length by the Southern blot analysis of terminal restriction fragment lengths. Nat. Protoc. 5, 1596–1607 (2010).

    Google Scholar 

  30. Jasmine, F. et al. A novel pooled-sample multiplex luminex assay for high-throughput measurement of relative telomere length. Am. J. Hum. Biol. 30, e23118 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  31. Pierce, B. L. et al. Telomere length measurement by a novel Luminex-based assay: a blinded comparison to Southern blot. Int J. Mol. Epidemiol. Genet. 7, 18–23 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  32. Ding, Z., Mangino, M., Aviv, A., Spector, T. & Durbin, R. Estimating telomere length from whole genome sequence data. Nucleic Acids Res. 42, e75 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  33. Nersisyan, L. & Arakelyan, A. Computel: computation of mean telomere length from whole-genome next-generation sequencing data. PLOS ONE 10, e0125201 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  34. Farmery, J. H. R., Smith, M. L. & Lynch, A. G. Telomerecat: a ploidy-agnostic method for estimating telomere length from whole genome sequencing data. Sci. Rep. 8, 1300 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  35. Lansdorp, P. M. et al. Heterogeneity in telomere length of human chromosomes. Hum. Mol. Genet. 5, 685–691 (1996).

    Google Scholar 

  36. Uppuluri, L., Varapula, D., Young, E., Riethman, H. & Xiao, M. Single-molecule telomere length characterization by optical mapping in nano-channel array: perspective and review on telomere length measurement. Environ. Toxicol. Pharm. 82, 103562 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  37. Jeffet, J., Margalit, S., Michaeli, Y. & Ebenstein, Y. Single-molecule optical genome mapping in nanochannels: multidisciplinarity at the nanoscale. Essays Biochem. 65, 51–66 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  38. McCaffrey, J. et al. High-throughput single-molecule telomere characterization. Genome Res. 27, 1904–1915 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  39. Lai, T. P. et al. A method for measuring the distribution of the shortest telomeres in cells and tissues. Nat. Commun. 8, 1356 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  40. Grigorev, K. et al. Haplotype diversity and sequence heterogeneity of human telomeres. Genome Res. 31, 1269–1279 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  41. Stephens, Z., Ferrer, A., Boardman, L., Iyer, R. K. & Kocher, J. P. A. Telogator: a method for reporting chromosome-specific telomere lengths from long reads. Bioinformatics 38, 1788–1793 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  42. Stephens, Z. & Kocher, J. P. Characterization of telomere variant repeats using long reads enables allele-specific telomere length estimation. BMC Bioinform. 25, 194 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  43. Karimian, K. et al. Human telomere length is chromosome end–specific and conserved across individuals. Science 384, 533–539 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  44. Schmidt, T. T. et al. High resolution long-read telomere sequencing reveals dynamic mechanisms in aging and cancer. Nat. Commun. 15, 5149 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  45. Tham, C. Y. et al. High-throughput telomere length measurement at nucleotide resolution using the PacBio high fidelity sequencing platform. Nat. Commun. 14, 281 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  46. Martens, U. M. et al. Short telomeres on human chromosome 17p. Nat. Genet. 18, 76–80 (1998). PubMed PMID: 9425906.

    Google Scholar 

  47. Graakjaer, J. et al. The pattern of chromosome-specific variations in telomere length in humans is determined by inherited, telomere-near factors and is maintained throughout life. Mech. Ageing Dev. 124, 629–640 (2003).

    Google Scholar 

  48. Londoño-Vallejo, J. A., DerSarkissian, H., Cazes, L. & Thomas, G. Differences in telomere length between homologous chromosomes in humans. Nucleic Acids Res. 29, 3164–3171 (2001).

    Google Scholar 

  49. Mahmoud, M. et al. Utility of long-read sequencing for All of Us. Nat. Commun. 15, 837 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  50. Liao, W. W. et al. A draft human pangenome reference. Nature 617, 312–324 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  51. Guarracino, A. et al. Recombination between heterologous humanacrocentric chromosomes. Nature 617, 335–343 (2023).

  52. Antonarakis, S. E. Short arms of human acrocentric chromosomes and the completion of the human genome sequence. Genome Res. 32, 599–607 (2022).

  53. Burgoyne, P. S. Genetic homology and crossing over in the X and Y chromosomes of mammals. Hum. Genet. 61, 85–90 (1982).

  54. Nakao, T. et al. Genomic, phenomic, and geographic associations of leukocyte telomere length in the United States [Internet]. Preprint at https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.11.02.24316529 (2026).

  55. Zheng, Y. L. et al. High-throughput single telomere analysis using DNA microarray and fluorescent in situ hybridization. Nucleic Acids Res 52, e96 (2024). PubMed PMID: 39291738; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC11514468.

    Google Scholar 

  56. Sholes, S. L. et al. Chromosome-specific telomere lengths and the minimal functional telomere revealed by nanopore sequencing. Genome Res. 32, 616–628 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  57. Tan, K. T., Slevin, M. K., Meyerson, M. & Li, H. Identifying and correcting repeat-calling errors in nanopore sequencing of telomeres. Genome Biol. 23, 180 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  58. Nguyen, L. & Choi, J. Y. Topsicle: a method for estimating telomere length from whole genome long-read sequencing data. Genome Biol. 26, 295 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  59. Marcand, S., Gilson, E. & Shore, D. A protein-counting mechanism for telomere length regulation in yeast. Science 275, 986–990 (1997).

    Google Scholar 

  60. Teplitz, G. M. et al. A mechanism for telomere-specific telomere length regulation. Nucleic Acids Res. 54, gkaf1457 (2026).

  61. Achrem, M., Szućko, I. & Kalinka, A. The epigenetic regulation of centromeres and telomeres in plants and animals. Comp. Cytogenet. 14, 265–311 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  62. Gonzalo, S. et al. DNA methyltransferases control telomere length and telomere recombination in mammalian cells. Nat. Cell Biol. 8, 416–424 (2006).

    Google Scholar 

  63. Graakjaer, J. et al. The relative lengths of individual telomeres are defined in the zygote and strictly maintained during life. Aging Cell 3, 97–102 (2004).

    Google Scholar 

  64. Arnoult, N. et al. Replication timing of human telomeres is chromosome arm–specific, influenced by subtelomeric structures and connected to nuclear localization. PLOS Genet. 6, e1000920 (2010).

    Google Scholar 

  65. Gardner, M. et al. Gender and telomere length: Systematic review and meta-analysis. Exp. Gerontol. 51, 15–27 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  66. Hansen, M. E. B. et al. Shorter telomere length in Europeans than in Africans due to polygenetic adaptation. Hum. Mol. Genet. 25, 2324–2330 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  67. Hunt, S. C. et al. Leukocyte telomeres are longer in African Americans than in whites: the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute Family Heart Study and the Bogalusa Heart Study. Aging Cell 7, 451–458 (2008). PubMed PMID: 18462274; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC2810865.

    Google Scholar 

  68. Deng, Y. et al. Telomere length and the risk of cardiovascular diseases: a Mendelian randomization study. Front. Cardiovasc. Med. 9, 1012615 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  69. Xu, C. et al. Association between leucocyte telomere length and cardiovascular disease in a large general population in the United States. Sci. Rep. 10, 80 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  70. Xing, J. et al. Constitutive short telomere length of chromosome 17p and 12q but not 11q and 2p are associated with an increased risk for esophageal cancer. Cancer Prev. Res. 2, 459–465 (2009).

    Google Scholar 

  71. Alder, J. K. et al. Diagnostic utility of telomere length testing in a hospital-based setting. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 115, E2358–E2365 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  72. Bick, A. G. et al. Genomic data in the All of Us research program. Nature 627, 340–346 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  73. The “All of Us” Research Program. N. Engl. J. Med. 381, 668–676 (2019).

  74. All of Us Research Program Genomic Research Data Quality Report v8 [Internet]. 2025. p. 120. Report: All of Us Curated Data Repository (CDR) release C2024Q3R3. Available from: https://support.researchallofus.org/hc/en-us/articles/29390274413716-All-of-Us-Genomic-Quality-Report

  75. All of Us Research Program Genomic Research Data Quality Report v7 [Internet]. 2024. p. 95. Report: All of Us Curated Data Repository (CDR) release C2022Q4R9. Available from: https://support.researchallofus.org/hc/en-us/articles/4617899955092-All-of-Us-Genomic-Quality-Report-ARCHIVED-C2022Q4R9-CDR-v7

  76. Voss, K., Van der Auwera, G. & Gentry, J. Full-stack genomics pipelining with GATK4 + WDL + Cromwell [version 1; not peer reviewed]. ISCB Comm J; 2017. Available from: https://f1000research.com/slides/6-1381

  77. Cheng, H., Concepcion, G. T., Feng, X., Zhang, H. & Li, H. Haplotype-resolved de novo assembly using phased assembly graphs with hifiasm. Nat. Methods 18, 170–175 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  78. Li, H. et al. The sequence alignment/map format and SAMtools. Bioinformatics 25, 2078–2079 (2009).

    Google Scholar 

  79. Pedersen, B. S. & Quinlan, A. R. Mosdepth: quick coverage calculation for genomes and exomes. Bioinformatics 34, 867–868 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  80. Grolemund, G. & Wickham, H. Dates and times made easy with lubridate. J. Stat. Softw. 40, 1–25 (2011).

    Google Scholar 

  81. Tarasov, A., Vilella, A. J., Cuppen, E., Nijman, I. J. & Prins, P. Sambamba: fast processing of NGS alignment formats. Bioinformatics 31, 2032–2034 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  82. Nakagawa, S. & Schielzeth, H. A general and simple method for obtaining R2 from generalized linear mixed-effects models. Methods Ecol. Evol. 4, 133–142 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  83. Agapito, I. et al. Sex-based disparities with cost-related medication adherence issues in patients with hypertension, ischemic heart disease, and heart failure. J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc. 31, 2924–2931 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  84. Jain, N. et al. Determinants of chromosome-specific telomere lengths among 2,573 All of Us participants. https://github.com/niyati1211/All-of-Us-chromosome-specific-telomere-lengths; https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18868086 (2026).

Download references

Acknowledgements

We gratefully acknowledge All of Us participants, who provided data and biological samples that supported this research. We also thank the National Institutes of Health’s All of Us Research Program for enabling access to the data examined in this study. This work was supported by grants U01HG007601 (to B.L.P.), R35ES028379 (to B.L.P.), 1R01GM154421 (to L.S.C.), 1U01MH139345 (to L.S.C.), P30ES027792 (to H.A.), R03HL172114 (to B.A.), and 1OT2OD036445 (to B.A. and H.A.).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Public Health Sciences, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA

    Niyati Jain, Habibul Ahsan, Lin S. Chen & Brandon L. Pierce

  2. Committee on Genetics, Genomics, Systems Biology, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA

    Niyati Jain & Brandon L. Pierce

  3. Department of Public Health and Medicinal Administration, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Macau, SAR Macau, China

    Jiajun Luo

  4. Institute for Population and Precision Health, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA

    Yuqing Yang, Habibul Ahsan & Briseis Aschebrook-Kilfoy

  5. Department of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA

    Kathryn Demanelis

  6. UPMC Hillman Cancer Center, Pittsburgh, PA, USA

    Kathryn Demanelis

  7. University of Chicago Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA

    Habibul Ahsan, Briseis Aschebrook-Kilfoy & Brandon L. Pierce

  8. Department of Human Genetics, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA

    Brandon L. Pierce

Authors
  1. Niyati Jain
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Jiajun Luo
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Yuqing Yang
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Kathryn Demanelis
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Habibul Ahsan
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Briseis Aschebrook-Kilfoy
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Lin S. Chen
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Brandon L. Pierce
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

N.J. contributed to study conception, performed analyses, interpreted the data, and wrote the main manuscript text.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Brandon L. Pierce.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests

Peer review

Peer review information

Nature Communications thanks the anonymous reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work. A peer review file is available.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Information (download PDF )

Description of Additional Supplementary Files (download PDF )

Supplementary Data 1-10 (download XLSX )

Reporting Summary (download PDF )

Transparent Peer Review file (download PDF )

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Jain, N., Luo, J., Yang, Y. et al. Determinants of chromosome-specific telomere lengths among 2573 All of Us participants. Nat Commun (2026). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-026-71172-x

Download citation

  • Received: 06 August 2025

  • Accepted: 16 March 2026

  • Published: 28 March 2026

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-026-71172-x

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

Download PDF

Advertisement

Explore content

  • Research articles
  • Reviews & Analysis
  • News & Comment
  • Videos
  • Collections
  • Subjects
  • Follow us on Facebook
  • Follow us on X
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed

About the journal

  • Aims & Scope
  • Editors
  • Journal Information
  • Open Access Fees and Funding
  • Calls for Papers
  • Editorial Values Statement
  • Journal Metrics
  • Editors' Highlights
  • Contact
  • Editorial policies
  • Top Articles

Publish with us

  • For authors
  • For Reviewers
  • Language editing services
  • Open access funding
  • Submit manuscript

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

  • Explore articles by subject
  • Find a job
  • Guide to authors
  • Editorial policies

Nature Communications (Nat Commun)

ISSN 2041-1723 (online)

nature.com footer links

About Nature Portfolio

  • About us
  • Press releases
  • Press office
  • Contact us

Discover content

  • Journals A-Z
  • Articles by subject
  • protocols.io
  • Nature Index

Publishing policies

  • Nature portfolio policies
  • Open access

Author & Researcher services

  • Reprints & permissions
  • Research data
  • Language editing
  • Scientific editing
  • Nature Masterclasses
  • Research Solutions

Libraries & institutions

  • Librarian service & tools
  • Librarian portal
  • Open research
  • Recommend to library

Advertising & partnerships

  • Advertising
  • Partnerships & Services
  • Media kits
  • Branded content

Professional development

  • Nature Awards
  • Nature Careers
  • Nature Conferences

Regional websites

  • Nature Africa
  • Nature China
  • Nature India
  • Nature Japan
  • Nature Middle East
  • Privacy Policy
  • Use of cookies
  • Legal notice
  • Accessibility statement
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Your US state privacy rights
Springer Nature

© 2026 Springer Nature Limited

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing