Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Advertisement

Nature Communications
  • View all journals
  • Search
  • My Account Login
  • Content Explore content
  • About the journal
  • Publish with us
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed
  1. nature
  2. nature communications
  3. articles
  4. article
Whole-proteome phage immunoprecipitation sequencing reveals germ cell tumor–specific immunosignature
Download PDF
Download PDF
  • Article
  • Open access
  • Published: 01 April 2026

Whole-proteome phage immunoprecipitation sequencing reveals germ cell tumor–specific immunosignature

  • M. Bakri Hammami  ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0003-3422-51631,2 na1,
  • Andrew M. Knight1 na1,
  • Haidara Kherbek1,
  • Brian A. Costello3,
  • Silvana B. De Lorenzo1,
  • Bradley C. Leibovich4,
  • John C. Cheville1,
  • Yong Guo5,
  • Reghann G. LaFrance-Corey1,
  • Naveen K. Paramasivan  ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0002-2185-43851,5,
  • Shannon R. Hinson1,
  • Jessica Sagen1,
  • Janet E. Olson  ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0003-4944-77896,
  • Alicia Algeciras-Schimnich  ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0002-4455-62171,
  • Sean J. Pittock1,5,
  • John R. Mills  ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0003-1025-47601,
  • Surendra Dasari  ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0002-7972-35561,6 &
  • …
  • Divyanshu Dubey  ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0001-6865-90451,5 

Nature Communications (2026) Cite this article

  • 3828 Accesses

  • 70 Altmetric

  • Metrics details

We are providing an unedited version of this manuscript to give early access to its findings. Before final publication, the manuscript will undergo further editing. Please note there may be errors present which affect the content, and all legal disclaimers apply.

Subjects

  • Diagnostic markers
  • Germ cell tumours
  • Proteomic analysis
  • Translational immunology

Abstract

Germ cell tumors (GCTs) pose significant diagnostic challenges because of the limited performance of existing tumor markers. Here, we used phage immunoprecipitation sequencing (PhIP-Seq) to develop a unique immunosignature panel to improve diagnosing and differentiating GCT. Using 427 serum samples (150 GCT, 277 controls), we developed and validated an immunosignature panel (GCT-iSIGN) comprising 24 peptides from 16 unique proteins. This panel achieved 93% sensitivity, 99% specificity, and an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.98, identifying 23/24 biomarker-negative GCT cases. A secondary model (Sem-iSIGN), consisting of 17 peptides from five proteins, differentiated seminoma from nonseminoma with 96% specificity, 65% sensitivity, and AUC of 0.77. RNA sequencing data from The Cancer Genome Atlas confirmed differential overexpression of target antigens in testicular cancer. ELISA validation of ERVK7 and LUZP4 and immunohistochemical detection of ERVK7, MUC4, ZNF91, and LUZP4 in tumor tissues supported target expression. This study highlights PhIP-Seq immunoprofiling to identify serum-based immunosignature panels that can serve as biomarkers for GCTs. This approach addresses the shortcomings of conventional markers and offers a scalable, cost-effective tool for improving cancer diagnosis and management.

Similar content being viewed by others

Single-cell analysis unravels divergent gene signatures shaping seminoma stemness and metastasis

Article Open access 07 November 2025

Transcriptome analysis reveals upregulation of immune response pathways at the invasive tumour front of metastatic seminoma germ cell tumours

Article Open access 12 January 2022

Integrated analysis of single-cell and bulk RNA-sequencing reveals a novel signature based on NK cell marker genes to predict prognosis and immunotherapy response in gastric cancer

Article Open access 01 April 2024

Data availability

The raw PhIP-Seq sequencing files (FASTQ format) generated and analyzed during this study are available through Zenodo at https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17478533. Processed enrichment matrices and associated metadata are included within the repository. De-identified clinical information is included in supplementary data 1. Source data are provided with this paper.

Code availability

The complete bioinformatics pipeline used for PhIP-Seq data processing and modeling, including scripts for sequence alignment, enrichment calculation, and classifier development, is publicly available at https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17478533.

References

  1. Cheng, L. et al. Testicular cancer. Nat. Rev. Dis. Primers 4, 29 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Chovanec, M. & Cheng, L. Advances in diagnosis and treatment of testicular cancer. BMJ 379, e070499 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Oldenburg, J. et al. Testicular seminoma and non-seminoma: ESMO-EURACAN Clinical Practice Guideline for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. Ann. Oncol. 33, 362–375 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Network, N. C. C. Testicular cancer (Version 1.2025), <https://www.nccn.org/professionals/physician_gls/pdf/testicular.pdf>.

  5. Dieckmann, K. P. et al. Serum tumour markers in testicular germ cell tumours: frequencies of elevated levels and extents of marker elevation are significantly associated with clinical parameters and with response to treatment. Biomed. Res. Int. 2019, 5030349 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Dieckmann, K. P. et al. MicroRNAs miR-371-3 in serum as diagnostic tools in the management of testicular germ cell tumours. Br. J. Cancer 107, 1754–1760 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Shtricker, A. et al. The value of testicular ultrasound in the prediction of the type and size of testicular tumors. Int. Braz. J. Urol. 41, 655–660 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Aberger, M., Wilson, B., Holzbeierlein, J. M., Griebling, T. L. & Nangia, A. K. Testicular self-examination and testicular cancer: a cost-utility analysis. Cancer Med. 3, 1629–1634 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  9. De Martino, M., Chieffi, P. & Esposito, F. miRNAs and biomarkers in testicular germ cell tumors: an update. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 22, 1380 (2021).

  10. Yodkhunnatham, N., Pandit, K., Puri, D., Yuen, K. L. & Bagrodia, A. MicroRNAs in testicular germ cell tumors: the teratoma challenge. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 25, 2156 (2024).

  11. Huang, Z. et al. PhIP-Seq: methods, applications and challenges. Front. Bioinform. 4, 1424202 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  12. Dubey, D. et al. Leucine Zipper 4 autoantibody: a novel germ cell tumor and paraneoplastic biomarker. Ann. Neurol. 89, 1001–1010 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  13. Mandel-Brehm, C. et al. Kelch-like protein 11 antibodies in seminoma-associated paraneoplastic encephalitis. N. Engl. J. Med. 381, 47–54 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  14. Dubey, D. et al. Identification of caveolae-associated protein 4 autoantibodies as a biomarker of immune-mediated rippling muscle disease in adults. JAMA Neurol. 79, 808–816 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  15. Lange, P. H., McIntire, K. R., Waldmann, T. A., Hakala, T. R. & Fraley, E. E. Serum alpha fetoprotein and human chorionic gonadotropin in the diagnosis and management of nonseminomatous germ-cell testicular cancer. N. Engl. J. Med. 295, 1237–1240 (1976).

    Google Scholar 

  16. Javadpour, N., McIntire, K. R. & Waldmann, T. A. Human chorionic gonadotropin (HCG) and alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) in sera and tumor cells of patients with testicular seminoma: a prospective study. Cancer 42, 2768–2772 (1978).

    Google Scholar 

  17. Masterson, T. A., Rice, K. R. & Beck, S. D. Current and future biologic markers for disease progression and relapse in testicular germ cell tumors: a review. Urol. Oncol. 32, 261–271 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  18. Majewski, M. et al. Misuse of tumor marker levels leads to an insufficient International Germ Cell Consensus Classification (IGCCCG) risk group assignment and impaired treatment. Cancer Med. 12, 16829–16836 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  19. Sundell, G. N. & Tao, S. C. Phage immunoprecipitation and sequencing-a versatile technique for mapping the antibody reactome. Mol. Cell Proteom. 23, 100831 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  20. Meeusen, E., Lim, E. & Mathivanan, S. Secreted tumor antigens - immune biomarkers for diagnosis and therapy. Proteomics 17, 1600442 (2017).

  21. Jiang, H. W. et al. SARS-CoV-2 proteome microarray for global profiling of COVID-19 specific IgG and IgM responses. Nat. Commun. 11, 3581 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  22. Almstrup, K. et al. Application of miRNAs in the diagnosis and monitoring of testicular germ cell tumours. Nat. Rev. Urol. 17, 201–213 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  23. Tavares, N. T., Henrique, R., Jeronimo, C. & Lobo, J. Current role of microRNAs in the diagnosis and clinical management of germ cell tumors. Surg. Pathol. Clin. 18, 91–100 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  24. Nestler, T., Schoch, J., Belge, G. & Dieckmann, K. P. MicroRNA-371a-3p-the novel serum biomarker in testicular germ cell tumors. Cancers 15, 3944 (2023).

  25. Fankhauser, C. D. et al. Detection of recurrences using serum miR-371a-3p during active surveillance in men with stage I testicular germ cell tumours. Br. J. Cancer 126, 1140–1144 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  26. Sykes, J., Kaldany, A. & Jang, T. L. Current and evolving biomarkers in the diagnosis and management of testicular germ cell tumors. J. Clin. Med. 13, 7448 (2024).

  27. Krasic, J. et al. The utility of cfDNA in TGCT patient management: a systematic review. Ther. Adv. Med. Oncol. 14, 17588359221090365 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  28. O’Donovan, B. et al. High-resolution epitope mapping of anti-Hu and anti-Yo autoimmunity by programmable phage display. Brain Commun. 2, fcaa059 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  29. Bourgonje, A. R. et al. Phage-display immunoprecipitation sequencing of the antibody epitope repertoire in inflammatory bowel disease reveals distinct antibody signatures. Immunity 56, 1393–1409 e1396 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  30. Davoudi, S., Ahmadi, T., Papavasilieou, E., Leskov, I. & Sobrin, L. Phage immunoprecipitation sequencing of autoantigens in autoimmune retinopathy. Ocul. Immunol. Inflamm. 26, 417–424 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  31. Rezk, M. et al. Identification of SKOR2 IgG as a novel biomarker of paraneoplastic neurologic syndrome. Front. Immunol. 14, 1243946 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  32. Kherbek, H. et al. Exploring autoantigens in autoimmune limbic encephalitis using phage immunoprecipitation sequencing. J. Neurol. 272, 292 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  33. Dong, X. Y., Yang, X. A., Wang, Y. D. & Chen, W. F. Zinc-finger protein ZNF165 is a novel cancer-testis antigen capable of eliciting antibody response in hepatocellular carcinoma patients. Br. J. Cancer 91, 1566–1570 (2004).

    Google Scholar 

  34. Cox, P. M. & Goding, C. R. Transcription and cancer. Br. J. Cancer 63, 651–662 (1991).

    Google Scholar 

  35. Cassandri, M. et al. Zinc-finger proteins in health and disease. Cell Death Discov. 3, 17071 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  36. Huntley, S. et al. A comprehensive catalog of human KRAB-associated zinc finger genes: insights into the evolutionary history of a large family of transcriptional repressors. Genome Res. 16, 669–677 (2006).

    Google Scholar 

  37. Tommerup, N. & Vissing, H. Isolation and fine mapping of 16 novel human zinc finger-encoding cDNAs identify putative candidate genes for developmental and malignant disorders. Genomics 27, 259–264 (1995).

    Google Scholar 

  38. Imbeault, M., Helleboid, P. Y. & Trono, D. KRAB zinc-finger proteins contribute to the evolution of gene regulatory networks. Nature 543, 550–554 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  39. Ogawa, T. et al. Enhanced expression in seminoma of human zinc finger genes located on chromosome 19. Cancer Genet. Cytogenet. 100, 36–42 (1998).

    Google Scholar 

  40. Hamilton, A. T. et al. Evolutionary expansion and divergence in the ZNF91 subfamily of primate-specific zinc finger genes. Genome Res. 16, 584–594 (2006).

    Google Scholar 

  41. O’Reilly, J. A. et al. Diagnostic potential of zinc finger protein-specific autoantibodies and associated linear B-cell epitopes in colorectal cancer. PLoS ONE 10, e0123469 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  42. Bataller, L., Wade, D. F., Fuller, G. N., Rosenfeld, M. R. & Dalmau, J. Cerebellar degeneration and autoimmunity to zinc-finger proteins of the cerebellum. Neurology 59, 1985–1987 (2002).

    Google Scholar 

  43. Routsias, J. G. et al. Zinc ion dependent B-cell epitope, associated with primary Sjogren’s syndrome, resides within the putative zinc finger domain of Ro60kD autoantigen: physical and immunologic properties. J. Med. Chem. 47, 4327–4334 (2004).

    Google Scholar 

  44. Lee, S. et al. A tumor necrosis factor-alpha-responsive cryptic promoter drives overexpression of the human endogenous retrovirus ERVK-7. J. Biol. Chem. 301, 108568 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  45. Attermann, A. S., Bjerregaard, A. M., Saini, S. K., Gronbaek, K. & Hadrup, S. R. Human endogenous retroviruses and their implication for immunotherapeutics of cancer. Ann. Oncol. 29, 2183–2191 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  46. Kitsou, K., Lagiou, P. & Magiorkinis, G. Human endogenous retroviruses in cancer: Oncogenesis mechanisms and clinical implications. J. Med. Virol. 95, e28350 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  47. Ng, K. W. et al. Antibodies against endogenous retroviruses promote lung cancer immunotherapy. Nature 616, 563–573 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  48. Zavesky, L. et al. Human endogenous retroviruses in breast cancer: altered expression pattern implicates divergent roles in carcinogenesis. Oncology 102, 858–867 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  49. Carraway, K. L. et al. Muc4/sialomucin complex, the intramembrane ErbB2 ligand, in cancer and epithelia: to protect and to survive. Prog. Nucleic Acid Res. Mol. Biol. 71, 149–185 (2002).

    Google Scholar 

  50. Singh, A. P., Chaturvedi, P. & Batra, S. K. Emerging roles of MUC4 in cancer: a novel target for diagnosis and therapy. Cancer Res. 67, 433–436 (2007).

    Google Scholar 

  51. Moniaux, N. et al. Generation and characterization of anti-MUC4 monoclonal antibodies reactive with normal and cancer cells in humans. J. Histochem. Cytochem. 52, 253–261 (2004).

    Google Scholar 

  52. Kirschmann, D. A., Seftor, E. A., Nieva, D. R., Mariano, E. A. & Hendrix, M. J. Differentially expressed genes associated with the metastatic phenotype in breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res. Treat. 55, 127–136 (1999).

    Google Scholar 

  53. Bray, F., Ferlay, J., Devesa, S. S., McGlynn, K. A. & Moller, H. Interpreting the international trends in testicular seminoma and nonseminoma incidence. Nat. Clin. Pract. Urol. 3, 532–543 (2006).

    Google Scholar 

  54. Biermann, K. et al. Genome-wide expression profiling reveals new insights into pathogenesis and progression of testicular germ cell tumors. Cancer Genom. Proteom. 4, 359–367 (2007).

    Google Scholar 

  55. Port, M. et al. Gene expression profiling in seminoma and nonseminoma. J. Clin. Oncol. 23, 58–69 (2005).

    Google Scholar 

  56. Dobbin, K. K. & Song, X. Sample size requirements for training high-dimensional risk predictors. Biostatistics 14, 639–652 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  57. Dobbin, K. K., Zhao, Y. & Simon, R. M. How large a training set is needed to develop a classifier for microarray data? Clin. Cancer Res. 14, 108–114 (2008).

    Google Scholar 

  58. Li, H. & Durbin, R. Fast and accurate short read alignment with Burrows-Wheeler transform. Bioinformatics 25, 1754–1760 (2009).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank Sara Vinje for administrative assistance. We thank Gerard Hebert for editorial assistance. We are grateful to the patients and their families for their participation in this study. This work is supported by Department of Defense (DOD) grant #CA210208 awarded to D.D. (PI), B.A.C., and S.D. (Co-I).

Author information

Author notes
  1. These authors contributed equally: M. Bakri Hammami, Andrew M. Knight.

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA

    M. Bakri Hammami, Andrew M. Knight, Haidara Kherbek, Silvana B. De Lorenzo, John C. Cheville, Reghann G. LaFrance-Corey, Naveen K. Paramasivan, Shannon R. Hinson, Jessica Sagen, Alicia Algeciras-Schimnich, Sean J. Pittock, John R. Mills, Surendra Dasari & Divyanshu Dubey

  2. Department of Hematology and Oncology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL, USA

    M. Bakri Hammami

  3. Department of Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA

    Brian A. Costello

  4. Department of Urology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA

    Bradley C. Leibovich

  5. Department of Neurology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA

    Yong Guo, Naveen K. Paramasivan, Sean J. Pittock & Divyanshu Dubey

  6. Department of Quantitative Health Sciences, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA

    Janet E. Olson & Surendra Dasari

Authors
  1. M. Bakri Hammami
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Andrew M. Knight
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Haidara Kherbek
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Brian A. Costello
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Silvana B. De Lorenzo
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Bradley C. Leibovich
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  7. John C. Cheville
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Yong Guo
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Reghann G. LaFrance-Corey
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  10. Naveen K. Paramasivan
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  11. Shannon R. Hinson
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  12. Jessica Sagen
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  13. Janet E. Olson
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  14. Alicia Algeciras-Schimnich
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  15. Sean J. Pittock
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  16. John R. Mills
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  17. Surendra Dasari
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  18. Divyanshu Dubey
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

Conception and design of the study: A.M.K., S.D., and D.D. Acquisition of data: M.B.H., A.M.K., H.K., B.A.C., S.B.D.L., B.C.L., J.C.C., Y.G., R.G.L.-C., N.K.P., S.R.H., J.S., J.E.O., A.A.-S., S.J.P., J.R.M., S.D., and D.D. Data analysis: M.B.H, A.M.K., S.B.D.L., and S.D. Drafting the manuscript or figures: M.B.H., A.M.K., S.B.D.L., Y.G., J.C.C., N.K.P., and D.D. Study supervision: D.D. All authors reviewed and edited the manuscript and approved the final version of the manuscript for submission.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Divyanshu Dubey.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

A.A.S. has participated on advisory boards for Roche Diagnostics and Fujirebio Diagnostics. She has received speaker honoraria from Roche Diagnostics. S.J.P. reports receiving grants, personal fees paid to Mayo Clinic, and nonfinancial support from Alexion Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and MedImmune, Inc./Viela Bio; receiving personal fees from Genentech/Roche, UCB, and Astellas, outside the submitted work; holding patent 8,889,102 (application 12–678350) issued and patent 9,891,219B2 (application 12–573942) issued. D.D. consulted for UCB, Immunovant, Argenx, Arialys, and Astellas Pharmaceuticals. All compensation for consulting activities is paid directly to Mayo Clinic. He is a named inventor on a filed patent that relates to KLHL11 as a marker of autoimmunity and germ cell tumors. He has patents pending for LUZP4-IgG, cavin-4-IgG, and SKOR2-IgG as markers of neurological autoimmunity. He has received funding from the DOD (CA210208 and PR220430), David J. Tomassoni ALS Research Grant Program, and UCB. The rest of the authors have no competing interests.

Peer review

Peer review information

Nature Communications thanks Vaibhav Upadhyay and the other anonymous reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work. A peer review file is available.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Information (download PDF )

Transparent Peer Review File (download PDF )

Reporting Summary (download PDF )

Description of Additional Supplementary Files (download PDF )

Supplementary Data 1 (download XLSX )

Source data

Source data (download XLSX )

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if you modified the licensed material. You do not have permission under this licence to share adapted material derived from this article or parts of it. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Hammami, M.B., Knight, A.M., Kherbek, H. et al. Whole-proteome phage immunoprecipitation sequencing reveals germ cell tumor–specific immunosignature. Nat Commun (2026). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-026-71174-9

Download citation

  • Received: 20 July 2025

  • Accepted: 10 March 2026

  • Published: 01 April 2026

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-026-71174-9

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

Download PDF

Associated content

Collection

Phages: from biology to the clinic

Advertisement

Explore content

  • Research articles
  • Reviews & Analysis
  • News & Comment
  • Videos
  • Collections
  • Subjects
  • Follow us on Facebook
  • Follow us on X
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed

About the journal

  • Aims & Scope
  • Editors
  • Journal Information
  • Open Access Fees and Funding
  • Calls for Papers
  • Editorial Values Statement
  • Journal Metrics
  • Editors' Highlights
  • Contact
  • Editorial policies
  • Top Articles

Publish with us

  • For authors
  • For Reviewers
  • Language editing services
  • Open access funding
  • Submit manuscript

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

  • Explore articles by subject
  • Find a job
  • Guide to authors
  • Editorial policies

Nature Communications (Nat Commun)

ISSN 2041-1723 (online)

nature.com footer links

About Nature Portfolio

  • About us
  • Press releases
  • Press office
  • Contact us

Discover content

  • Journals A-Z
  • Articles by subject
  • protocols.io
  • Nature Index

Publishing policies

  • Nature portfolio policies
  • Open access

Author & Researcher services

  • Reprints & permissions
  • Research data
  • Language editing
  • Scientific editing
  • Nature Masterclasses
  • Research Solutions

Libraries & institutions

  • Librarian service & tools
  • Librarian portal
  • Open research
  • Recommend to library

Advertising & partnerships

  • Advertising
  • Partnerships & Services
  • Media kits
  • Branded content

Professional development

  • Nature Awards
  • Nature Careers
  • Nature Conferences

Regional websites

  • Nature Africa
  • Nature China
  • Nature India
  • Nature Japan
  • Nature Middle East
  • Privacy Policy
  • Use of cookies
  • Legal notice
  • Accessibility statement
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Your US state privacy rights
Springer Nature

© 2026 Springer Nature Limited

Nature Briefing: Cancer

Sign up for the Nature Briefing: Cancer newsletter — what matters in cancer research, free to your inbox weekly.

Get what matters in cancer research, free to your inbox weekly. Sign up for Nature Briefing: Cancer