Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Advertisement

Nature Communications
  • View all journals
  • Search
  • My Account Login
  • Content Explore content
  • About the journal
  • Publish with us
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed
  1. nature
  2. nature communications
  3. articles
  4. article
Structural basis for the assembly and translocation of the Vip1-Vip2 insecticidal toxin from Bacillus thuringiensis
Download PDF
Download PDF
  • Article
  • Open access
  • Published: 30 March 2026

Structural basis for the assembly and translocation of the Vip1-Vip2 insecticidal toxin from Bacillus thuringiensis

  • Ting Zhao1 na1,
  • Zeyu Wang  ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0003-0087-81232 na1,
  • Jing Ren1,3,4,
  • Xianle Han2,
  • Linpeng Li1,3,4,
  • Zheng Liu  ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0002-6842-62731,3,4,
  • Jie Zhang  ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0001-9524-46702 &
  • …
  • Peng Chen  ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0002-6356-76831,3,4 

Nature Communications , Article number:  (2026) Cite this article

  • 1096 Accesses

  • 1 Altmetric

  • Metrics details

We are providing an unedited version of this manuscript to give early access to its findings. Before final publication, the manuscript will undergo further editing. Please note there may be errors present which affect the content, and all legal disclaimers apply.

Subjects

  • Bacterial structural biology
  • Bacterial toxins
  • Cryoelectron microscopy

Abstract

Insecticidal toxins from Bacillus thuringiensis (Bt) have been extensively and successfully used in genetically engineered crops for decades but continue to face challenges from the adaptive resistance in the insect population. The Bt binary toxin Vip1Ad1(Vip1) and Vip2Ag1(Vip2), a promising next-generation candidate gene combination for transgenic crops, have demonstrated high efficacy against the destructive coleopteran pest white grubs, however, their mode of action remains largely elusive. In this study, we report cryo-EM structures of the heptameric Vip1-pore and Vip2-bound Vip1-pore complex, capturing a series of putative assembly-related intermediates that suggest a binary toxin assembly and translocation pathway. Together with structure-guided mutagenesis, these data provide insights into a sequential assembly of binary complex and a sequence-independent translocation mechanism. Proof-of-principle experiments showed successful delivery of a desired protein cargo into host cells based on the mini-Vip2-Vip1 pore system, paving the way for developing much needed extracellular pesticidal protein delivery platforms. These findings not only clarify the assembly and translocation mechanism of the binary insecticidal toxin pair but also offer an excellent alternative model to investigate human-pathogenic pore-forming toxins because of its similarity and biosafety.

Similar content being viewed by others

Cryo-EM structures of an insecticidal Bt toxin reveal its mechanism of action on the membrane

Article Open access 14 May 2021

In vivo competition assays between Vip3 proteins confirm the occurrence of shared binding sites in Spodoptera littoralis

Article Open access 17 March 2022

Mosquitocidal toxin-like islands in Bacillus thuringiensis S2160-1 revealed by complete-genome sequence and MS proteomic analysis

Article Open access 02 July 2024

Data availability

Cryo-EM maps were deposited to the Electron Microscopy Data Bank (https://www.ebi.ac.uk/emdb/) under accession codes EMD-65010 (Vip1 heptameric pore), EMD-65009 (Vip2 bound heptameric pore complex), EMD-65007 (1:5 (Vip2:Vip1) complex). The corresponding coordinates were deposited to the Protein Data Bank (https://www.rcsb.org/) under accession codes 9VEK (Vip1 heptameric pore), 9VEJ (Vip2 bound heptameric pore complex), 9VEG (1:5 (Vip2:Vip1) complex). All other published PDB codes cited in this paper are 6SMS, 7YVQ and 1QS1. All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in this article. Source data are provided as a Source Data file. Source data are provided with this paper.

References

  1. Pardo-López, L., Soberón, M. & Bravo, A. Bacillus thuringiensis insecticidal three-domain Cry toxins: mode of action, insect resistance and consequences for crop protection. FEMS Microbiol. Rev. 37, 3–22 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Chakroun, M., Banyuls, N., Bel, Y., Escriche, B. & Ferré, J. Bacterial vegetative insecticidal proteins (Vip) from entomopathogenic bacteria. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 80, 329–350 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Li, J., Carroll, J. & Ellar, D. J. Crystal structure of insecticidal δ-endotoxin from Bacillus thuringiensis at 2.5 Å resolution. Nature 353, 815–821 (1991).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Badran, A. H. et al. Continuous evolution of Bacillus thuringiensis toxins overcomes insect resistance. Nature 533, 58–63 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Soberón, M. et al. Engineering modified bt toxins to counter insect resistance. Science 318, 1640–1642 (2007).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Ye, Z. et al. Too much of a good thing: Lessons from compromised rootworm Bt maize in the US Corn Belt. Science 387, 984–989 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Warren, G.W. Advances in Insect Control: the Role of Transgenic Plants (eds. Carozzi, N.B. & Koziel, M.G.), 109–121 (CRC Press, 1997).

  8. Syed, T. et al. Current insights on vegetative insecticidal proteins (Vip) as next generation pest killers. Toxins 12, 522 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Han, S., Craig, J. A., Putnam, C. D., Carozzi, N. B. & Tainer, J. A. Evolution and mechanism from structures of an ADP-ribosylating toxin and NAD complex. Nat. Struct. Biol. 6, 932–936 (1999).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Crickmore, N. et al. Revision of the nomenclature for the Bacillus thuringiensis pesticidal crystal proteins. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 62, 807–813 (1998).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Bi, Y. et al. Genomic sequencing identifies novel Bacillus thuringiensis Vip1/Vip2 binary and Cry8 toxins that have high toxicity to Scarabaeoidea larvae. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 99, 753–760 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  12. Suzuki, T. et al. Editorial: plant-pest interactions volume III: coleoptera and lepidoptera. Front. Plant Sci. 12, 730290 (2021).

  13. Gibert, M. et al. Differential requirement for the translocation of clostridial binary toxins: Iota toxin requires a membrane potential gradient. FEBS Lett. 581, 1287–1296 (2007).

    Google Scholar 

  14. Knapp, O., Benz, R. & Popoff, M. R. Pore-forming activity of clostridial binary toxins. Biochim. Biophys. Acta (BBA) Biomembr. 1858, 512–525 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  15. Barbut, F. et al. Clinical features of Clostridium difficile-associated diarrhoea due to binary toxin (actin-specific ADP-ribosyltransferase)-producing strains. J. Med. Microbiol. 54, 181–185 (2005).

    Google Scholar 

  16. Chellapandi, P. & Prisilla, A. Structure, function and evolution of Clostridium botulinum C2 and C3 toxins: insight to poultry and veterinary vaccines. Curr. Protein Pept. Sci. 18, 412–424 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  17. Nagahama, M., Kobayashi, K. & Takehara, M. Cathepsin release from lysosomes promotes endocytosis of Clostridium perfringens iota-toxin. Toxins 13, 721 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  18. Papatheodorou, P. et al. Identification of the Cellular Receptor of Clostridium spiroforme Toxin. Infect. Immun. 80, 1418–1423 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  19. Hardenbrook, N. J. et al. Atomic structures of anthrax toxin protective antigen channels bound to partially unfolded lethal and edema factors. Nat. Commun. 11, 840 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  20. Jucovic, M., Walters, F. S., Warren, G. W., Palekar, N. V. & Chen, J. S. From enzyme to zymogen: engineering Vip2, an ADP-ribosyltransferase from Bacillus cereus, for conditional toxicity. Protein Eng., Des. Sel. 21, 631–638 (2008).

    Google Scholar 

  21. Wynia-Smith, S. L., Brown, M. J., Chirichella, G., Kemalyan, G. & Krantz, B. A. Electrostatic ratchet in the protective antigen channel promotes anthrax toxin translocation. J. Biol. Chem. 287, 43753–43764 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  22. Yamada, T. et al. Cryo-EM structures reveal translocational unfolding in the clostridial binary iota toxin complex. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 27, 288–296 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  23. Sheedlo, M. J., Anderson, D. M., Thomas, A. K. & Lacy, D. B. Structural elucidation of the Clostridioides difficile transferase toxin reveals a single-site binding mode for the enzyme. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 117, 201920555 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  24. Kawamoto, A. et al. Cryo-EM structures of the translocational binary toxin complex CDTa-bound CDTb-pore from Clostridioides difficile. Nat. Commun. 13, 6119 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  25. Krantz, B. et al. A phenylalanine clamp catalyzes protein translocation through the anthrax toxin pore. Science 309, 777–781 (2005).

    Google Scholar 

  26. Wang, K. et al. Lignocellulose degradation in Protaetia brevitarsis larvae digestive tract: refining on a tightly designed microbial fermentation production line. Microbiome 10, 90 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  27. Jiang, J., Pentelute, B. L., Collier, R. J. & Zhou, Z. H. Atomic structure of anthrax protective antigen pore elucidates toxin translocation. Nature 521, 545–549 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  28. Barth, H., Aktories, K., Popoff, M. R. & Stiles, B. G. Binary bacterial toxins: biochemistry, biology, and applications of common Clostridium and Bacillus proteins. Microbiol Mol. Biol. Rev. 68, 373–402 (2004).

    Google Scholar 

  29. Knapp, O. et al. Residues involved in the pore-forming activity of the Clostridium perfringens iota toxin. Cell Microbiol 17, 288–302 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  30. Larburu, N., Adams, C. J., Chen, C.-S., Nowak, P. R. & Ali, M. M. U. Mechanism of Hsp70 specialized interactions in protein translocation and the unfolded protein response. Open Biol. 10, 200089 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  31. Schopf, F. H., Biebl, M. M. & Buchner, J. The HSP90 chaperone machinery. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 18, 345–360 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  32. Kato, Y. et al. HSP70 and HSP90 differentially regulate translocation of extracellular antigen to the cytosol for cross-presentation. Autoimmune Dis. 2012, 745962 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  33. Geng, J. et al. Bacillus thuringiensis Vip1 functions as a receptor of Vip2 toxin for binary insecticidal activity against Holotrichia parallela. Toxins 11, 440 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  34. Thoren, K. L. & Krantz, B. A. The unfolding story of anthrax toxin translocation. Mol. Microbiol. 80, 588–595 (2011).

    Google Scholar 

  35. Feld, G. K. et al. Structural basis for the unfolding of anthrax lethal factor by protective antigen oligomers. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 17, 1383–1390 (2010).

    Google Scholar 

  36. Brown, M. J., Thoren, K. L. & Krantz, B. A. Role of the α clamp in the protein translocation mechanism of anthrax toxin. J. Mol. Biol. 427, 3340–3349 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  37. Collier, R. J. Membrane translocation by anthrax toxin. Mol. Asp. Med. 30, 413–422 (2009).

    Google Scholar 

  38. Krantz, B. A., Finkelstein, A. & Collier, R. J. Protein translocation through the anthrax toxin transmembrane pore is driven by a proton gradient. J. Mol. Biol. 355, 968–979 (2006).

    Google Scholar 

  39. Brown, M. J., Thoren, K. L. & Krantz, B. A. Charge requirements for proton gradient-driven translocation of anthrax toxin*. J. Biol. Chem. 286, 23189–23199 (2011).

    Google Scholar 

  40. Das, D. & Krantz, B. A. Peptide- and proton-driven allosteric clamps catalyze anthrax toxin translocation across membranes. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 113, 9611–9616 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  41. Leuber, M., Orlik, F., Schiffler, B., Sickmann, A. & Benz, R. Vegetative insecticidal protein (Vip1Ac) of Bacillus thuringiensis HD201: evidence for oligomer and channel formation. Biochemistry 45, 283–288 (2006).

    Google Scholar 

  42. Robert, X. & Gouet, P. Deciphering key features in protein structures with the new ENDscript server. Nucleic Acids Res. 42, W320–W324 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  43. Ashkenazy, H. et al. ConSurf 2016: an improved methodology to estimate and visualize evolutionary conservation in macromolecules. Nucleic Acids Res. 44, W344–W350 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  44. Yariv, B. et al. Using evolutionary data to make sense of macromolecules with a “face-lifted” ConSurf. Protein Sci. 32, e4582 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  45. Crickmore, N. et al. BPPRC. (Bacterial Pesticidal Protein Resource Center, https://www.bpprc.org).

  46. Ritter, A. T. et al. ESCRT-mediated membrane repair protects tumor-derived cells against T cell attack. Science 376, 377–382 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  47. Schrank, B. R. et al. An antibody–toxin conjugate targeting CD47 linked to the bacterial toxin listeriolysin O for cancer immunotherapy. Nat. Cancer 6, 511–527 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  48. Woida, P. J. & Satchell, K. J. F. The Vibrio cholerae MARTX toxin silences the inflammatory response to cytoskeletal damage before inducing actin cytoskeleton collapse. Sci. Signal. 13, eaaw9447 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  49. Koo, S., Cheley, S. & Bayley, H. Redirecting Pore Assembly of Staphylococcal α-Hemolysin by Protein Engineering. ACS Cent. Sci. 5, 629–639 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  50. Hermansen, S., Linke, D. & Leo, J.C. Chapter Four - Transmembrane β-barrel proteins of bacteria: From structure to function. in Advances in Protein Chemistry and Structural Biology, Vol. 128 (ed. Donev, R.) 113–161 (Academic Press, 2022).

  51. Waterhouse, A. et al. SWISS-MODEL: homology modelling of protein structures and complexes. Nucleic Acids Res. 46, W296–W303 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  52. Emsley, P., Lohkamp, B., Scott, W.G. & Cowtan, K. Features and development of Coot. Acta Crystallogr, D: Biol. Crystallogr. 66, 486–501 (2010).

  53. Pettersen, E. F. et al. UCSF Chimera—a visualization system for exploratory research and analysis. J. Comput. Chem. 25, 1605–1612 (2004).

    Google Scholar 

  54. Afonine, P.V., Poon, B.K., Read, R.J., Sobolev, O.V. & Adams, P.D. Real-space refinement in PHENIX for cryo-EM and crystallography. Acta Crystallogr. D Struct. Biol. 74, 531–544 (2018).

  55. Hink, W. F. Established insect cell line from the cabbage looper, Trichoplusia ni. Nature 226, 466–467 (1970).

    Google Scholar 

  56. Mi, L. et al. Enterobacter strain IPPBiotE33 displays a synergistic effect with Bacillus thuringiensis Bt185. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 24, 14193 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  57. Zhao, H., Brautigam, C. A., Ghirlando, R. & Schuck, P. Overview of current methods in sedimentation velocity and sedimentation equilibrium analytical ultracentrifugation. Curr. Protoc. Protein Sci. 71, 20.12.1–20.12.49 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  58. Schuck, P., Perugini, M. A., Gonzales, N. R., Howlett, G. J. & Schubert, D. Size-distribution analysis of proteins by analytical ultracentrifugation: strategies and application to model systems. Biophys. J. 82, 1096–1111 (2002).

    Google Scholar 

  59. Wang, Z. et al. JAK/STAT signaling regulated intestinal regeneration defends insect pests against pore-forming toxins produced by Bacillus thuringiensis. PLoS Pathog. 20, e1011823 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  60. Jiang, S. et al. Generic Diagramming Platform (GDP): a comprehensive database of high-quality biomedical graphics. Nucleic Acids Res. 53, D1670–D1676 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank Ms. Danyang Li and Xiangning Li from the Core Facility of Wuhan. University for their assistance with the cryo-EM data collection, thank Prof. Changyou Li and Dr. Guiling Zheng from Qingdao Agricultural University to supply H.parallela HP9-2 Cells, thank Prof. Qing Yang, Prof. Changlong Shu and Dr. Lili Geng from Institute of Plant Protection, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences for their technical guidance about the insecticidal bioassay. We thank Dr. Qing Chang for providing AUC support at Biomolecule Preparation and Characterization Platform of the Technology Center for Protein Research, Tsinghua University. We thank Derek Duong, Dr. Linfeng Gao, and Dr. Baohua Chen for improving the language and style of the manuscript. This work is supported by grants from Natural Science Foundation of Wuhan (grant number 2024040801020228) for Z.L., Provincial Natural Science Foundation of China (grant number 2024AFB026) for Z.L., a startup fund from Wuhan University awarded to P.C., and Innovation Program of Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences (CAAS-CSCB-202401 and CAAS-ZDRW202304 to Z.W.).

Author information

Author notes
  1. These authors contributed equally: Ting Zhao, Zeyu Wang.

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University, Taikang Center for Life and Medical Sciences, School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Wuhan University, Wuhan, China

    Ting Zhao, Jing Ren, Linpeng Li, Zheng Liu & Peng Chen

  2. State Key Laboratory for Biology of Plant Diseases and Insect Pests, Institute of Plant Protection, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing, China

    Zeyu Wang, Xianle Han & Jie Zhang

  3. Clinical Medicine Research Center for Minimally Invasive Procedure of Hepatobiliary & Pancreatic Diseases of Hubei Province, Hubei, China

    Jing Ren, Linpeng Li, Zheng Liu & Peng Chen

  4. Key Laboratory of Combinatorial Biosynthesis and Drug Discovery, Ministry of Education and School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Wuhan University, Wuhan, China

    Jing Ren, Linpeng Li, Zheng Liu & Peng Chen

Authors
  1. Ting Zhao
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Zeyu Wang
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Jing Ren
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Xianle Han
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Linpeng Li
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Zheng Liu
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Jie Zhang
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Peng Chen
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

Conceptualization: T.Z. and P.C. Methodology: T.Z., J.R., L.L., Z.L., and Z.W. Investigation: T.Z., J.R., L.L., Z.W., and X.H. Writing: T.Z., Z.W., and P.C. Supervision: J.Z. and P.C. Funding acquisition: Z.L., Z.W., and P.C.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Jie Zhang or Peng Chen.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Peer review

Peer review information

Nature Communications thanks Nicholas Waterfield and the other, anonymous, reviewers for their contribution to the peer review of this work. A peer review file is available.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Information (download PDF )

Description of Additional Supplementary Files (download PDF )

Supplementary Movie 1 (download MP4 )

Supplementary Movie 2 (download MP4 )

Reporting Summary (download PDF )

Transparent Peer Review file (download PDF )

Source data

Source Data (download XLSX )

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if you modified the licensed material. You do not have permission under this licence to share adapted material derived from this article or parts of it. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zhao, T., Wang, Z., Ren, J. et al. Structural basis for the assembly and translocation of the Vip1-Vip2 insecticidal toxin from Bacillus thuringiensis. Nat Commun (2026). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-026-71211-7

Download citation

  • Received: 15 August 2025

  • Accepted: 17 March 2026

  • Published: 30 March 2026

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-026-71211-7

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

Download PDF

Advertisement

Explore content

  • Research articles
  • Reviews & Analysis
  • News & Comment
  • Videos
  • Collections
  • Subjects
  • Follow us on Facebook
  • Follow us on X
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed

About the journal

  • Aims & Scope
  • Editors
  • Journal Information
  • Open Access Fees and Funding
  • Calls for Papers
  • Editorial Values Statement
  • Journal Metrics
  • Editors' Highlights
  • Contact
  • Editorial policies
  • Top Articles

Publish with us

  • For authors
  • For Reviewers
  • Language editing services
  • Open access funding
  • Submit manuscript

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

  • Explore articles by subject
  • Find a job
  • Guide to authors
  • Editorial policies

Nature Communications (Nat Commun)

ISSN 2041-1723 (online)

nature.com footer links

About Nature Portfolio

  • About us
  • Press releases
  • Press office
  • Contact us

Discover content

  • Journals A-Z
  • Articles by subject
  • protocols.io
  • Nature Index

Publishing policies

  • Nature portfolio policies
  • Open access

Author & Researcher services

  • Reprints & permissions
  • Research data
  • Language editing
  • Scientific editing
  • Nature Masterclasses
  • Research Solutions

Libraries & institutions

  • Librarian service & tools
  • Librarian portal
  • Open research
  • Recommend to library

Advertising & partnerships

  • Advertising
  • Partnerships & Services
  • Media kits
  • Branded content

Professional development

  • Nature Awards
  • Nature Careers
  • Nature Conferences

Regional websites

  • Nature Africa
  • Nature China
  • Nature India
  • Nature Japan
  • Nature Middle East
  • Privacy Policy
  • Use of cookies
  • Legal notice
  • Accessibility statement
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Your US state privacy rights
Springer Nature

© 2026 Springer Nature Limited

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing