Abstract
Mountainous regions, such as the Alps, Appalachians, Andes, and Qingzang Plateau, offer vast renewable energy potential, but geographical and ecological challenges limit conventional overhead transmission lines. Underground alternatives, including gas-insulated lines and cables, provide viable solutions but require comprehensive techno-economic evaluation for sustainable deployment. This study integrates multi-physics analysis, combining electromagnetic, thermal, and fluid dynamics, with lifecycle cost assessment per unit transmission task to compare overhead and underground tunnel transmission systems. Optimized conductor designs and ventilation strategies enhance cable capacity and improve economic performance, particularly in regions with high external costs. Here, we show that underground tunnel based power transmission systems, especially gas-insulated lines, deliver cost-effective, high-capacity transmission solutions for mountainous renewable energy concentrated regions, outperform overhead power transmission infrastructure when external costs, including ecological, landscape, and infrastructure constraints, are significant, thus advancing the goals of sustainable renewable energy integration and net-zero.
Data availability
The datasets generated and analyzed during the current study are available in figshare. https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.3022657971. The repository contains the numerical outputs of the finite-element simulations (electromagnetic, thermal, and ventilation scenarios) and derived results that underpin the figures and tables reported in the main text and Supplementary Information. Source data are provided with this paper.
Code availability
The custom MATLAB and Python codes used for data processing, figure generation, current-carrying capacity calculations, and ventilation optimization are available in figshare. https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.3022656772. The repository includes the complete scripts referenced in the paper together with the input data needed to run them.
References
Khan, M. T. I. & Anwar, S. Natural disasters and foreign exchange reserves: The role of renewable energy and human capital. Renew. Energy 192, 838–848 (2022).
Millstein, D., Wiser, R., Bolinger, M. & Barbose, G. The climate and air-quality benefits of wind and solar power in the United States. Nat. Energy 2, 1–10 (2017).
International Energy Agency (IEA). Renewables 2022 Analysis and Forecast to 2027. (2022).
DeRolph, C. R., McManamay, R. A., Morton, A. M. & Nair, S. S. City energysheds and renewable energy in the United States. Nat. Sustain. 2, 412–420 (2019).
Kumar, R. et al. Renewable energy adoption: Design, development, and assessment of solar tree for the mountainous region. Int. J. Energy Res. 46, 743–759 (2022).
Mulcué-Nieto, L. F. et al. Energy performance assessment of monocrystalline and polycrystalline photovoltaic modules in the tropical mountain climate: The case for Manizales-Colombia. Energy Rep. 6, 2828–2835 (2020).
Kim, K. J., Lee, H. & Koo, Y. Research on local acceptance cost of renewable energy in South Korea: A case study of photovoltaic and wind power projects. Energy Policy 144, 111684 (2020).
Hastik, R. et al. Using the ‘footprint’ approach to examine the potentials and impacts of renewable energy sources in the European Alps. Mt. Res. Dev. 36, 130–140 (2016).
Li, D. et al. High Mountain Asia hydropower systems threatened by climate-driven landscape instability. Nat. Geosci. 15, 520–530 (2022).
Scott, C. A. et al. Renewable electricity production in mountain regions: Toward a people-centered energy transition agenda. Mt. Res. Dev. 43, A1–A8 (2023).
Arnette, A. N. & Zobel, C. W. Spatial analysis of renewable energy potential in the greater southern Appalachian mountains. Renew. Energy 36, 2785–2798 (2011).
Mamani, R. & Hendrick, P. Wind power potential in highlands of the Bolivian Andes: A numerical approach. Energies 15, 1–16 (2022).
Qiu, L., He, L., Lu, H. & Liang, D. Systematic potential analysis on renewable energy centralized co-development at high altitude: A case study in Qinghai-Tibet plateau. Energy Convers. Manag. 267, 115879 (2022).
Zhuang, M. et al. Opportunities for household energy on the Qinghai-Tibet Plateau in line with United Nations’ Sustainable Development Goals. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 144, 110982 (2021).
Qiu, L., He, L., Lu, H. & Liang, D. Pumped hydropower storage potential and its contribution to hybrid renewable energy co-development: A case study in the Qinghai-Tibet Plateau. J. Energy Storage 51, 104447 (2022).
Karim, J. & Hardiantono, D. Potential analysis of renewable energy in Nduga District Papua Mountain Province. MATEC Web Conf. 372, 09001 (2022).
Global Wind Energy Council (GWEC). Global Wind Report 2022. (2022).
International Energy Agency (IEA). The Future of Geothermal Energy. (2024).
Meng, Y., Gao, B., Duan, Y., Wang, Y. & Li, H. Analysis and recommendations on the current state of renewable energy development in Tibet. Sustainability 16, 10974 (2024).
Qin, C. et al. Spatial and temporal patterns of hydropower development on the Qinghai–Tibet Plateau. Sustainability 15, 6688 (2023).
Nabuurs, G.-J. et al. Next-generation information to support a sustainable course for European forests. Nat. Sustain. 2, 815–818 (2019).
Tempesta, T., Vecchiato, D. & Girardi, P. The landscape benefits of the burial of high voltage power lines: A study in rural areas of Italy. Landsc. Urban Plan 126, 53–64 (2014).
Rambonilaza, T., Dubé, J. & Ay, J. S. External costs of high-voltage overhead transmission lines: Evidence from a causal approach in rural France. Environ. Impact Assess. Rev. 109, 107639 (2024).
Klimenta, D. et al. Controlling the thermal environment of underground cable lines using the pavement surface radiation properties. IET Gener. Transm. Distrib. 12, 2968–2976 (2018).
Fenrick, S. A. & Getachew, L. Cost and reliability comparisons of underground and overhead power lines. Uti. Policy 20, 31–37 (2012).
Musa, U., Mati, A. A., Mas’Ud, A. A. & Shehu, G. S. Finite element modeling of fields distributions in a Three-core XLPE cable with multiple cavities. IEEE PES/IAS PowerAfrica 29, 32 (2021).
Martinho, L. B. et al. 3-D finite-element analysis of conductive coupling problems in transmission line rights of way. IEEE Trans. Magn. 50, 1–4 (2014).
Del-Pino-López, J. C., Hatlo, M. & Cruz-Romero, P. On simplified 3D finite element simulations of three-core armored power cables. Energies 11, 3081 (2018).
Wu, L., Jin, Q., Yu, X. & Zhang, B. Electromagnetic-thermal multi-physics coupling simulation of cable joints: Considering contact resistance and typical defects. Front. Energy Res. 12, 1475355 (2024).
Yang, Z., He, D. & Ding, L. The optimization study for electromagnetic radiation with ultrahigh voltage transmission lines. IEEE Trans. Electromagn. Compat. 64, 1480–1492 (2022).
Pilgrim, J. A. Circuit rating methods for high temperature cables. PhD thesis, Univ. Southampton (2011).
Pilgrim, J. A. et al. Rating independent cable circuits in forced-ventilated cable tunnels. IEEE Trans. Power Deliv. 25, 2046–2053 (2010).
Li, Y. et al. Planning of optimal operation scheme for ventilated tunnel fans based on cable conductor temperature. IEEE Trans. Power Deliv. 38, 2563–2572 (2023).
Jia, C., Hu, Y., Dai, L., Shi, C. & Zheng, Y. Optimized ventilation design for high-geothermal tunnels considering worker comfort. Appl. Therm. Eng. 267, 125772 (2025).
Midcontinent Independent System Operator (MISO). Transmission Cost Estimation Guide For MTEP24. (2024).
Paulson Institute. Power Play: China’s Ultra-High Voltage Technology and Global Standards. (2015).
The Institution of Engineering and Technology. A Comparison of Electricity Transmission Technologies: Costs and Characteristics. (2025).
Liu, Z. et al. Key technical parameters of UHV GIL in Sutong utility tunnel project. Power Syst. Technol. 44, 2377–2385 (2020).
U.S. Energy Information Administration, Assessing HVDC Transmission for Impacts of Non-Dispatchable Generation. www.eia.gov (2018).
Yin, J., Wei, Q., Shao, D., Luo, Z. & Ji, L. The impacts of power transmission and transformation projects on ecological corridors and landscape connectivity: a case study of Shandong province. China Sci. Rep. 15, 6709 (2025).
Girardi, P. et al. The External Costs Evaluation for Power Transmission Lines: Focus of Overhead Lines. CIGRÉ Report.
DeSantis, D., James, B. D., Houchins, C., Saur, G. & Lyubovsky, M. Cost of long-distance energy transmission by different carriers. iScience 24, 103495 (2021).
Australian Energy Market Operator. Transmission Cost Report. (AEMO, 2021).
Huang, Q., Habib Khawaja, A., Chen, Y. & Li, J. Magnetic Field Measurement with Applications to Modern Power Grids. (IEEE Press, 2020).
C95.1-2019 - IEEE Standard for Safety Levels with Respect to Human Exposure to Electric, Magnetic, and Electromagnetic Fields, 0 Hz to 300 GHz. (IEEE, 2019).
Bailey, W. H. et al. Synopsis of IEEE Std C95.1TM−2019 ‘IEEE standard for safety levels with respect to human exposure to electric, magnetic, and electromagnetic fields, 0 Hz to 300 GHz. IEEE Access 7, 171346–171356 (2019).
International Commission on Non-Ionizing Radiation Protection. ICNIRP Guidelines for Limiting Exposure to Time-Varying Electric and Magnetic Fields (1 Hz – 100 kHz). Health Phys. 99, 818–836 (2010).
Koch, Hermann. Gas Insulated Transmission Lines (GIL). (IEEE Press, 2015).
C57.12.00-2021 - IEEE Standard for General Requirements for Liquid-Immersed Distribution, Power, and Regulating Transformers. (IEEE, 2022).
Hernández Jiménez, V. J., Castronuovo, E. D. & Sánchez, I. Optimal statistical calculation of power cables disposition in tunnels, for reducing magnetic fields and costs. Int. J. Electr. Power Energy Syst. 103, 360–368 (2018).
Schlemper, H.-D. Design and test of a 1100 kV GIL for tunnel installation. in CIGRÉ-IEC Int. Conf. on EHV and UHV (AC & DC) (2019).
Yang, B., Yao, H. & Wang, F. A review of ventilation and environmental control of underground spaces. Energies 15, 409 (2022).
Li, A. et al. Ventilation and environmental control of underground spaces: A short review. E3S Web Conf. 111, 1–5 (2019).
Zengin Esra, Yousef Bozorgnia & Jonathan P. Stewart. Evaluating the Seismic Vulnerability and Resilience of BART’s Berkeley Hills Tunnel. (ITS, 2025) https://doi.org/10.7922/G22J697K.
Bi, F. et al. A numerical investigation of the behavior of a tunnel with adaptive anti-dislocation measures subjected to the action of fault dislocation. Sci. Rep. 14, 1182 (2024).
Neumann, C. Feasibility analysis of 400 kV Line Hinkley–Seabank as Gas-Insulated Line (GIL) under Consideration of Technical and Economic Issues. Essen 31, (2013).
European Commission. Commission Staff Working Document Impact Assessment Report. (European Commission, 2022).
United States Environmental Protection Agency. Assessment of the Use of Sulfur Hexafluoride (SF6) Gas Insulated Switchgears (GIS) within the Offshore Wind Sector. https://ghgdata.epa.gov/ghgp/main.do (EPA, 2023).
Maxime, P. et al. C4-FN Mixture for High-Voltage Equipment. (Grid Solutions SAS and Hitachi Energy, 2024).
Loizou, L., Chen, L. & Liu, Q. A Comparative Study on the Breakdown Characteristics of SF6 and 20% C3F7CN / 80% CO Gas Mixture in a Coaxial Configuration. in Annu. Rep. Conf. Electr. Insul. Dielectr. Phenom. (CEIDP) 234–237 (IEEE, 2019).
Helbig, D. Sustainable High-Voltage Products Blue Portfolio. (Siemens AG, 2019).
Fan, L., Chen, H., Zhao, S. & Wang, Y. Comparative economic analysis of transmission lines adopted for energy-saving conductors considering life cycle cost. Inventions 9, 75 (2024).
Larsen, P. H. A method to estimate the costs and benefits of undergrounding electricity transmission and distribution lines. Energy Econ. 60, 47–61 (2016).
Teegala, S. K. & Singal, S. K. Economic analysis of power transmission lines using interval mathematics. J. Electr. Eng. Technol. 10, 1471–1479 (2015).
Ramel, C. et al. Integrating ecosystem services within spatial biodiversity conservation prioritization in the Alps. Ecosyst. Serv. 45, 101186 (2020).
Zou, Y. et al. Research on spatial prediction technology for mitigating tunnel inrush disasters under complex geological conditions in China’s Hengduan Mountain Range. Sci. Rep. 15, 1850 (2025).
Donna, R., Guy, D., Daniel, F., Bill, S. & Robin, W. Cost and Constructability of Permafrost Test Sections Along the Alaska Highway, Yukon. in Proc. Annu. Conf. Transp. Assoc. Canada (2009).
High Speed Two A Guide to Tunnelling Costs. https://www.britishtunnelling.org.uk/.
Global Petrol Prices. Electricity Prices. Available at: https://www.globalpetrolprices.com/electricity_prices/.
International Energy Agency. Electricity 2025. (IEA, 2025).
Fan, H. et al. Shared data for article “Bulk electrical power extraction through tunnel transmission technology from renewable energy concentrated zones”. figshare. https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.30226579 (2026).
Fan, H. et al. Codes for data processing and figure generation used in the paper “Bulk electrical power extraction through tunnel transmission technology from renewable energy concentrated zones”. figshare. https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.30226567 (2026).
Acknowledgements
This research is partially supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China(grant no. U23A20651). Q. H.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
Conceptualization, Q.H. and H.F.; Methodology, H.F., Z.Z., and X.T.; Validation, Q.H., Z.Z., A.H.K., and M.S.; Formal Analysis, H.F. and A.H.K.; Investigation, H.F. and Q.H.; Resources, Q.H. and K.L.; Writing—Original Draft, H.F.; Writing—Review & Editing, Q.H., A.H.K., Z.Z., and M.S.; Visualization, H.F., A.H.K., and K.L.; Funding Acquisition, Q.H.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Peer review
Peer review information
Nature Communications thanks Anders Bergman, Illia Diahovchenko and the other, anonymous, reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work. A peer review file is available.
Additional information
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary information
Source data
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if you modified the licensed material. You do not have permission under this licence to share adapted material derived from this article or parts of it. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Fan, H., Huang, Q., Zhang, Z. et al. Bulk electrical power extraction through tunnel transmission technology from renewable energy concentrated zones. Nat Commun (2026). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-026-71221-5
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-026-71221-5