Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Advertisement

Nature Communications
  • View all journals
  • Search
  • My Account Login
  • Content Explore content
  • About the journal
  • Publish with us
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed
  1. nature
  2. nature communications
  3. articles
  4. article
Nucleophagy is promoted by two autophagy receptors and inhibited by chromatin-nuclear envelope tethering in fission yeast
Download PDF
Download PDF
  • Article
  • Open access
  • Published: 31 March 2026

Nucleophagy is promoted by two autophagy receptors and inhibited by chromatin-nuclear envelope tethering in fission yeast

  • Zhu-Hui Ma  ORCID: orcid.org/0009-0007-2259-30611,
  • Zhao-Qian Pan1,
  • Zhao-Di Jiang  ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0001-9480-69421,2,
  • Guang-Can Shao1,
  • Yu Hua  ORCID: orcid.org/0009-0008-3577-86011,
  • Fang Suo1,
  • Chen-Xi Zou1,
  • Yi-Feng Jiang3,
  • Meng-Qiu Dong  ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0002-6094-11821,2 &
  • …
  • Li-Lin Du  ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0002-1028-73971,2 

Nature Communications (2026) Cite this article

  • 3800 Accesses

  • 1 Altmetric

  • Metrics details

We are providing an unedited version of this manuscript to give early access to its findings. Before final publication, the manuscript will undergo further editing. Please note there may be errors present which affect the content, and all legal disclaimers apply.

Subjects

  • Cellular imaging
  • Macroautophagy
  • Nucleus

Abstract

Selective autophagy of the nucleus, known as nucleophagy, targets nuclear components for degradation. The molecular mechanisms underlying nucleophagy remain inadequately understood. In this study, we identify a nucleophagy receptor, Npr1, in the fission yeast Schizosaccharomyces pombe. Npr1 is an Atg8-binding multi-transmembrane protein localized to the outer nuclear membrane. It functions redundantly with another autophagy receptor, Epr1, to promote nitrogen starvation-induced nucleophagy. In the absence of both Npr1 and Epr1, starved cells exhibit abnormal nuclear morphology and reduced survival. During nucleophagy, the nuclear envelope (NE) forms outward protrusions where Atg8 co-localizes with Npr1 and/or Epr1. These protrusions subsequently detach from the NE, resulting in the formation of autophagosomes that contain nucleophagy cargo. Notably, artificially enhancing chromatin association with the inner nuclear membrane leads to NE protrusions that fail to detach, thereby aborting nucleophagy. Our findings provide mechanistic insights into nucleophagy and suggest that abortive nucleophagy protects chromatin from degradation.

Similar content being viewed by others

Nuclease–NTPase antiphage defence systems use conserved molecular features to control bacterial immunity

Article 27 April 2026

A quantitative ultrastructural timeline of nuclear autophagy reveals a role for dynamin-like protein 1 at the nuclear envelope

Article 07 February 2025

Nucleoporin PNET1 coordinates mitotic nuclear pore complex dynamics for rapid cell division

Article 31 January 2025

Data availability

The authors declare that all data supporting the findings of this study are available within the paper and its supplementary information files. Source data are provided with this paper.

References

  1. Klionsky, D. J. et al. How shall I eat thee? Autophagy 3, 413–416 (2007).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Xie, Z. & Klionsky, D. J. Autophagosome formation: core machinery and adaptations. Nat. Cell Biol. 9, 1102–1109 (2007).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Ohsumi, Y. Historical landmarks of autophagy research. Cell Res. 24, 9–23 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Nakatogawa, H. Mechanisms governing autophagosome biogenesis. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 21, 439–458 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Melia, T. J., Lystad, A. H. & Simonsen, A. Autophagosome biogenesis: from membrane growth to closure. J. Cell Biol. 219, e202002085 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Mizushima, N. & Komatsu, M. Autophagy: renovation of cells and tissues. Cell 147, 728–741 (2011).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Johansen, T. & Lamark, T. Selective autophagy: ATG8 family proteins, LIR motifs and cargo receptors. J. Mol. Biol. 432, 80–103 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Noda, N. N., Ohsumi, Y. & Inagaki, F. Atg8-family interacting motif crucial for selective autophagy. FEBS Lett. 584, 1379–1385 (2010).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Birgisdottir, ÅB., Lamark, T. & Johansen, T. The LIR motif–crucial for selective autophagy. J. Cell Sci. 126, 3237–3247 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Zaffagnini, G. & Martens, S. Mechanisms of selective autophagy. J. Mol. Biol. 428, 1714–1724 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Gatica, D., Lahiri, V. & Klionsky, D. J. Cargo recognition and degradation by selective autophagy. Nat. Cell Biol. 20, 233–242 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  12. Mochida, K. et al. Receptor-mediated selective autophagy degrades the endoplasmic reticulum and the nucleus. Nature 522, 359–362 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  13. Mochida, K. et al. Atg39 links and deforms the outer and inner nuclear membranes in selective autophagy of the nucleus. J. Cell Biol. 221, e202103178 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  14. Lee, C.-W. et al. Selective autophagy degrades nuclear pore complexes. Nat. Cell Biol. 22, 159–166 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  15. Tomioka, Y. et al. TORC1 inactivation stimulates autophagy of nucleoporin and nuclear pore complexes. J. Cell Biol. 219, e201910063 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  16. Chandra, S. et al. Atg39 selectively captures inner nuclear membrane into lumenal vesicles for delivery to the autophagosome. J. Cell Biol. 220, e202103030 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  17. Takeda, E. et al. Receptor-mediated cargo hitchhiking on bulk autophagy. EMBO J. 43, 3116–3140 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  18. Zhao, D. et al. A UPR-induced soluble ER-phagy receptor acts with VAPs to confer ER stress resistance. Mol. Cell 79, 963–977.e3 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  19. Zou, C.-X. et al. The ortholog of human REEP1-4 is required for autophagosomal enclosure of ER-phagy/nucleophagy cargos in fission yeast. PLoS Biol. 21, e3002372 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  20. Branon, T. C. et al. Efficient proximity labeling in living cells and organisms with TurboID. Nat. Biotechnol. 36, 880–887 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  21. Hayashi, A. et al. Localization of gene products using a chromosomally tagged GFP-fusion library in the fission yeast Schizosaccharomyces pombe. Genes Cells 14, 217–225 (2009).

    Google Scholar 

  22. Dobson, L., Reményi, I. & Tusnády, G. E. CCTOP: a consensus constrained TOPology prediction web server. Nucleic Acids Res. 43, W408–W412 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  23. Cabantous, S., Terwilliger, T. C. & Waldo, G. S. Protein tagging and detection with engineered self-assembling fragments of green fluorescent protein. Nat. Biotechnol. 23, 102–107 (2005).

    Google Scholar 

  24. Smoyer, C. J. et al. Analysis of membrane proteins localizing to the inner nuclear envelope in living cells. J. Cell Biol. 215, 575–590 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  25. Kamiyama, D. et al. Versatile protein tagging in cells with split fluorescent protein. Nat. Commun. 7, 11046 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  26. Jiang, Z. et al. Genetically encoded tags for direct synthesis of EM-visible gold nanoparticles in cells. Nat. Methods 17, 937–946 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  27. Ibrahim, T. et al. AlphaFold2-multimer guided high-accuracy prediction of typical and atypical ATG8-binding motifs. PLoS Biol. 21, e3001962 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  28. Evans, R. et al. Protein complex prediction with AlphaFold-Multimer. Preprint at https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.10.04.463034 (2021).

  29. Wu, F. et al. Structural basis of the differential function of the two C. elegans Atg8 homologs, LGG-1 and LGG-2, in autophagy. Mol. Cell 60, 914–929 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  30. Yu, Z.-Q. et al. Atg38-Atg8 interaction in fission yeast establishes a positive feedback loop to promote autophagy. Autophagy 16, 2036–2051 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  31. Mannino, P. J. et al. A quantitative ultrastructural timeline of nuclear autophagy reveals a role for dynamin-like protein 1 at the nuclear envelope. Nat. Cell Biol. 27, 464–476 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  32. Sun, L.-L. et al. Global analysis of fission yeast mating genes reveals new autophagy factors. PLoS Genet. 9, e1003715 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  33. Xie, Z., Nair, U. & Klionsky, D. J. Atg8 controls phagophore expansion during autophagosome formation. Mol. Biol. Cell 19, 3290–3298 (2008).

    Google Scholar 

  34. Matsuhara, H. & Yamamoto, A. Autophagy is required for efficient meiosis progression and proper meiotic chromosome segregation in fission yeast. Genes Cells 21, 65–87 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  35. Hirano, Y. et al. Lem2 is retained at the nuclear envelope through its interaction with Bqt4 in fission yeast. Genes Cells 23, 122–135 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  36. Hu, C. et al. Structural insights into chromosome attachment to the nuclear envelope by an inner nuclear membrane protein Bqt4 in fission yeast. Nucleic Acids Res. 47, 1573–1584 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  37. Chikashige, Y. et al. Membrane proteins Bqt3 and-4 anchor telomeres to the nuclear envelope to ensure chromosomal bouquet formation. J. Cell Biol. 187, 413–427 (2009).

    Google Scholar 

  38. Garabedian, M. V. et al. The double-bromodomain proteins Bdf1 and Bdf2 modulate chromatin structure to regulate S-phase stress response in Schizosaccharomyces pombe. Genetics 190, 487–500 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  39. Kalichuk, V. et al. The archaeal “7 kDa DNA-binding” proteins: extended characterization of an old gifted family. Sci. Rep. 6, 37274 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  40. Dhalluin, C. et al. Structure and ligand of a histone acetyltransferase bromodomain. Nature 399, 491–496 (1999).

    Google Scholar 

  41. Su, S. et al. Crystal structures of the chromosomal proteins Sso7d/Sac7d bound to DNA containing TG mismatched base-pairs. J. Mol. Biol. 303, 395–403 (2000).

    Google Scholar 

  42. Le, T. K. et al. A ubiquitin–proteasome pathway degrades the inner nuclear membrane protein Bqt4 to maintain nuclear membrane homeostasis. J. Cell Sci. 136, jcs260930 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  43. Meinema, A. C. et al. Long unfolded linkers facilitate membrane protein import through the nuclear pore complex. Science 333, 90–93 (2011).

    Google Scholar 

  44. Shen, X.-X. et al. Genome-scale phylogeny and contrasting modes of genome evolution in the fungal phylum Ascomycota. Sci. Adv. 6, eabd0079 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  45. Rutherford, K. M., Lera-Ramírez, M. & Wood, V. PomBase: a global core biodata resource—growth, collaboration, and sustainability. Genetics 227, iyae007 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  46. Li, Z., Mochida, K. & Nakatogawa, H. Macronucleophagy maintains cell viability under nitrogen starvation by modulating micronucleophagy. Nat. Commun. 15, 10670 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  47. Forsburg, S. L. & Rhind, N. Basic methods for fission yeast. Yeast 23, 173–183 (2006).

    Google Scholar 

  48. Bähler, J. et al. Heterologous modules for efficient and versatile PCR-based gene targeting in Schizosaccharomyces pombe. Yeast 14, 943–951 (1998).

    Google Scholar 

  49. Wei, Y., Wang, H.-T., Zhai, Y., Russell, P. & Du, L.-L. Mdb1, a fission yeast homolog of human MDC1, modulates DNA damage response and mitotic spindle function. PLoS One 9, e97028 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  50. Vještica, A. et al. A toolbox of stable integration vectors in the fission yeast Schizosaccharomyces pombe. J. Cell Sci. 133, jcs240754 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  51. Pan, Z.-Q., Yang, Y.-S., Du, L.-L. Pil1 co-tethering assay to detect protein–protein interactions in the fission yeast Schizosaccharomyces pombe. Methods Mol. Biol. 2862, 93–102 (2025).

  52. Hua, Y. et al. A meiotic driver hijacks an epigenetic reader to disrupt mitosis in noncarrier offspring. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 121, e2408347121 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  53. Chi, H. et al. Comprehensive identification of peptides in tandem mass spectra using an efficient open search engine. Nat. Biotechnol. 36, 1059–1061 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  54. Huang, X. et al. Fast, long-term, super-resolution imaging with Hessian structured illumination microscopy. Nat. Biotechnol. 36, 451–459 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  55. Schindelin, J. et al. Fiji: an open-source platform for biological-image analysis. Nat. Methods 9, 676–682 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  56. Tran, P., Paoletti, A. & Chang, F. Imaging green fluorescent protein fusions in living fission yeast cells. Methods 33, 220–225 (2004).

    Google Scholar 

  57. Klement, E., Gyula, P. & Viczián, A. Detection of phytochrome phosphorylation in plants. Methods Mol. Biol. 2026, 41–67 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  58. McDonald J. H. Handbook of Biological Statistics, 3rd edn (Sparky House Publishing, 2014).

  59. Kaiser, C. A. & Schekman, R. Distinct sets of SEC genes govern transport vesicle formation and fusion early in the secretory pathway. Cell 61, 723–733 (1990).

    Google Scholar 

  60. Sehnal, D. et al. Mol* viewer: modern web app for 3D visualization and analysis of large biomolecular structures. Nucleic Acids Res. 49, W431–W437 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We are grateful to Ying Liu and He-Xia Luo of the NIBS EM Facility for their assistance with EM analysis. We also thank Wen-Yi Huang, Yin-Hua Lin, and Ke Du of Guangzhou Computational Super-Resolution Biotech Co., Ltd. for their support in live-cell imaging with their super-resolution microscope (HIS-SIM). Additionally, we thank Yi-Feng Jiang, Zhen-Hua Zhang, and Hao Zhang of the ZEISS Microscopy Customer Center in Beijing, as well as Eric Ho of Dragonfly, for their help with FIB-SEM analysis. We extend our gratitude to Meng-Li Shi for her assistance in drawing the models shown in Fig. 7g. This work was supported by the National Key R&D Program of China (2024YFA0917400 to L.-L.D.) and other grants from the Ministry of Science and Technology of China, the Beijing municipal government, and Tsinghua University to M.-Q.D. and L.-L.D.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. National Institute of Biological Sciences, Beijing, China

    Zhu-Hui Ma, Zhao-Qian Pan, Zhao-Di Jiang, Guang-Can Shao, Yu Hua, Fang Suo, Chen-Xi Zou, Meng-Qiu Dong & Li-Lin Du

  2. Tsinghua Institute of Multidisciplinary Biomedical Research, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China

    Zhao-Di Jiang, Meng-Qiu Dong & Li-Lin Du

  3. ZEISS Microscopy Customer Center, Beijing Laboratory, Beijing, China

    Yi-Feng Jiang

Authors
  1. Zhu-Hui Ma
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Zhao-Qian Pan
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Zhao-Di Jiang
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Guang-Can Shao
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Yu Hua
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Fang Suo
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Chen-Xi Zou
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Yi-Feng Jiang
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Meng-Qiu Dong
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  10. Li-Lin Du
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

Conceptualization: Z.-H.M. and L.-L.D. Methodology and investigation: Z.-H.M., Z.-Q.P., Z.-D.J., G.-C.S., Y.H., F.S., C.-X.Z., Y.-F.J., M.-Q.D., and L.-L.D. Writing—original draft: Z.-H.M. and L.-L.D. Writing—review and editing: Z.-H.M. and L.-L.D. Funding acquisition: M.-Q.D. and L.-L.D.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Li-Lin Du.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Peer review

Peer review information

Nature Communications thanks the anonymous reviewers for their contribution to the peer review of this work. A peer review file is available.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Information (download PDF )

Description of Additional Supplementary Files (download PDF )

Supplementary Data 1 (download XLSX )

Supplementary Data 2 (download XLSX )

Supplementary Data 3 (download XLSX )

Supplementary Movie 1 (download MOV )

Supplementary Movie 2 (download MOV )

Supplementary Movie 3 (download MOV )

Reporting Summary (download PDF )

Transparent Peer Review file (download PDF )

Source data

Source Data (download XLSX )

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ma, ZH., Pan, ZQ., Jiang, ZD. et al. Nucleophagy is promoted by two autophagy receptors and inhibited by chromatin-nuclear envelope tethering in fission yeast. Nat Commun (2026). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-026-71237-x

Download citation

  • Received: 05 April 2025

  • Accepted: 16 March 2026

  • Published: 31 March 2026

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-026-71237-x

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

Download PDF

Advertisement

Explore content

  • Research articles
  • Reviews & Analysis
  • News & Comment
  • Videos
  • Collections
  • Subjects
  • Follow us on Facebook
  • Follow us on X
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed

About the journal

  • Aims & Scope
  • Editors
  • Journal Information
  • Open Access Fees and Funding
  • Calls for Papers
  • Editorial Values Statement
  • Journal Metrics
  • Editors' Highlights
  • Contact
  • Editorial policies
  • Top Articles

Publish with us

  • For authors
  • For Reviewers
  • Language editing services
  • Open access funding
  • Submit manuscript

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

  • Explore articles by subject
  • Find a job
  • Guide to authors
  • Editorial policies

Nature Communications (Nat Commun)

ISSN 2041-1723 (online)

nature.com footer links

About Nature Portfolio

  • About us
  • Press releases
  • Press office
  • Contact us

Discover content

  • Journals A-Z
  • Articles by subject
  • protocols.io
  • Nature Index

Publishing policies

  • Nature portfolio policies
  • Open access

Author & Researcher services

  • Reprints & permissions
  • Research data
  • Language editing
  • Scientific editing
  • Nature Masterclasses
  • Research Solutions

Libraries & institutions

  • Librarian service & tools
  • Librarian portal
  • Open research
  • Recommend to library

Advertising & partnerships

  • Advertising
  • Partnerships & Services
  • Media kits
  • Branded content

Professional development

  • Nature Awards
  • Nature Careers
  • Nature Conferences

Regional websites

  • Nature Africa
  • Nature China
  • Nature India
  • Nature Japan
  • Nature Middle East
  • Privacy Policy
  • Use of cookies
  • Legal notice
  • Accessibility statement
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Your US state privacy rights
Springer Nature

© 2026 Springer Nature Limited

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing