Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Advertisement

Nature Communications
  • View all journals
  • Search
  • My Account Login
  • Content Explore content
  • About the journal
  • Publish with us
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed
  1. nature
  2. nature communications
  3. articles
  4. article
Long-read assembly reveals vast transcriptional complexity in the placenta associated with metabolic and endocrine function
Download PDF
Download PDF
  • Article
  • Open access
  • Published: 02 April 2026

Long-read assembly reveals vast transcriptional complexity in the placenta associated with metabolic and endocrine function

  • Sean T. Bresnahan  ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0001-6685-19301,
  • Hannah E. J. Yong  ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0002-8814-752X2,
  • Aryun Nemani3,
  • William H. Wu3,
  • Sierra Lopez  ORCID: orcid.org/0009-0003-7319-116X4,
  • Jerry Kok Yen Chan5,6,
  • Frédérique White  ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0002-3442-00337,
  • Pierre-Étienne Jacques  ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0002-3961-294X7,
  • Marie-France Hivert  ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0001-7752-25858,9,
  • Shiao-Yng Chan  ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0002-3530-30232,10,
  • Michael I. Love11,
  • Jonathan Y. Huang  ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0002-5901-84032,4,6 na1 &
  • …
  • Arjun Bhattacharya  ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0003-1196-43851,12 na1 

Nature Communications , Article number:  (2026) Cite this article

We are providing an unedited version of this manuscript to give early access to its findings. Before final publication, the manuscript will undergo further editing. Please note there may be errors present which affect the content, and all legal disclaimers apply.

Subjects

  • Gene expression
  • Intrauterine growth
  • Transcriptomics

Abstract

The placenta is critical for fetal development and mediates effects of pregnancy complications on offspring metabolic health yet remains poorly characterized in genomic studies. Existing transcriptomic analyses rely on adult tissue reference annotations, overlooking developmentally important splicing diversity. Using largest-in-class long-read RNA-seq (n = 72), we create a comprehensive placental transcriptome reference identifying 37,661 high-confidence isoforms (14,985 previously unannotated) across 12,302 genes (2,759 previously unannotated). Contrary to characterizations of the placenta as a transcriptomic void, we find transcriptional breadth and complexity comparable to adult tissues, with high splicing diversity of obesity- and growth-related gene transcripts, including 108 distinct CSH1 (placental lactogen) isoforms. Applying this reference to short-read RNA-seq from diverse populations (n = 352) reduced inferential uncertainty in isoform quantification by approximately 30%. We find placental transcription mediated 36% of gestational diabetes mellitus effects on birth weight, with ancestry-specific effects including previously unannotated CSH1 isoforms mediating larger effects in European (24.4%) than Asian (13.4%) populations. These findings illustrate the importance of tissue-matched, long-read annotations for isoform-resolved transcriptomics.

Data availability

Datasets required to reproduce the analyses conducted in this study are available in the associated Supplementary Data or have been deposited in a Zenodo repository under https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18841087. The repository includes the high-confidence placenta and GTEx v9 reference transcriptome GTFs, SQANTI3 classification tables, and the raw and InfRV-adjusted expression matrices for the GUSTO and Gen3G short-read datasets, quantified against each assembly described in this study. Oxford Nanopore long reads generated in this study are publicly accessible through the NCBI Sequence Read Archive (BioProject accession PRJNA1373130). All accessions for validation datasets used in transcriptome annotation filtering are available in Supplementary Dataset 16. An interactive Shiny application for visualizing transcript structures and exploring differential expression and GDM–birth weight mediation results is available at https://github.com/sbresnahan/lr-placenta-transcriptome-viz. GTEx v9 Oxford Nanopore long-read and Illumina short-read sequencing data are available under controlled access via dbGaP (accession phs000424.v9.p2 [https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/projects/gap/cgi-bin/study.cgi?study_id=phs000424.v9.p2]) and on AnVIL (https://anvil.terra.bio/#workspaces/anvil-datastorage/AnVIL_GTEx_V9_hg38), with access granted to authorized researchers for biomedical research purposes as per dbGaP procedures. Short-read data from GTEx tissues were used for isoform quantification and for splice junction validation of transcript models called from the associated long-read data. Illumina short reads from Gen3G, along with associated sample covariates, are available under controlled access via dbGaP (accession phs003151.v1.p1 [https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/projects/gap/cgi-bin/study.cgi?study_id=phs003151.v1.p1]); access requests are reviewed by the Gen3G data access committee, with decisions typically communicated within 4–6 weeks, and approved researchers must sign a data use agreement restricting use to the approved research purpose. Illumina short reads from GUSTO, along with associated sample covariates, are available under restricted access due to privacy and regulatory requirements governing human participant data; access requests should be submitted via https://gustodatavault.sg/about/request-for-data and will be reviewed by the GUSTO data access committee within 4–8 weeks, with approved researchers required to sign a data use agreement limiting use to the specified research purpose and prohibiting participant re-identification. Source data for graphs presented in the main text and supplementary materials are provided with this paper. Source data are provided with this paper.

Code availability

All custom scripts and analysis pipelines used in this study are publicly available at https://github.com/sbresnahan/lr-placenta-transcriptome and archived at https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18841087. This repository includes code for dataset preparation, Oxford Nanopore data processing and transcriptome assembly using ESPRESSO, SQANTI3-based annotation and quality control filtering, and short-read analyses in prospective prebirth cohorts including differential gene and transcript expression, mediation analysis, and GO enrichment analysis.

References

  1. McKay, R. Remarkable role for the placenta. Nature 472, 298–299 (2011).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Baron-Cohen, S. et al. Foetal oestrogens and autism. Mol. Psychiatry 25, 2970–2978 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Thornburg, K. L., O’Tierney, P. F. & Louey, S. Review: the placenta is a programming agent for cardiovascular disease. Placenta 31, S54–S59 (2010).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Ursini, G. et al. Convergence of placenta biology and genetic risk for schizophrenia. Nat. Med. 24, 792–801 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Peng, S. et al. Genetic regulation of the placental transcriptome underlies birth weight and risk of childhood obesity. PLOS Genet. 14, e1007799 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Tedner, S. G., Örtqvist, A. K. & Almqvist, C. Fetal growth and risk of childhood asthma and allergic disease. Clin. Exp. Allergy 42, 1430–1447 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Bronson, S. L. & Bale, T. L. The placenta as a mediator of stress effects on neurodevelopmental reprogramming. Neuropsychopharmacology 41, 207–218 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Stern, C. et al. Placental endocrine activity: adaptation and disruption of maternal glucose metabolism in pregnancy and the influence of fetal sex. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 22, 12722 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Olmos-Ortiz, A. et al. Immunoendocrine dysregulation during gestational diabetes mellitus: the central role of the placenta. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 22, 8087 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Jin, Y., McNicol, I. & Cattini, P. A. A locus control region generates distinct active placental lactogen and inactive growth hormone gene domains in term placenta that are disrupted with obesity. Placenta 164, 64–72 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Lowe, L. P. et al. Hyperglycemia and Adverse Pregnancy Outcome (HAPO) study. Diab. Care 35, 574–580 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  12. Page, K. A. et al. Children exposed to maternal obesity or gestational diabetes mellitus during early fetal development have hypothalamic alterations that predict future weight gain. Diab. Care 42, 1473–1480 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  13. Lacagnina, S. The Developmental Origins of Health and Disease (DOHaD). Am. J. Lifestyle Med. 14, 47–50 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  14. Liu, Z. et al. Large-scale chromatin reorganization reactivates placenta-specific genes that drive cellular aging. Dev. Cell 57, 1347–1368.e12 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  15. Rowan, J. A. et al. Metformin in gestational diabetes: the offspring follow-up (MiG TOFU): body composition and metabolic outcomes at 7–9 years of age. BMJ Open Diab. Res. Care 6, e000456 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  16. Crume, T. L. et al. Association of exposure to diabetes in utero with adiposity and fat distribution in a multiethnic population of youth: the Exploring Perinatal Outcomes among Children (EPOCH) Study. Diabetologia 54, 87–92 (2011).

    Google Scholar 

  17. Pinney, S. E. et al. Exposure to gestational diabetes enriches immune-related pathways in the transcriptome and methylome of human amniocytes. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 105, 3250–3264 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  18. Roadmap Epigenomics Consortium et al. Integrative analysis of 111 reference human epigenomes. Nature 518, 317–330 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  19. Davis, C. A. et al. The Encyclopedia of DNA elements (ENCODE): data portal update. Nucleic Acids Res 46, D794–D801 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  20. The GTEx Consortium Atlas of genetic regulatory effects across human tissues. Science 369, 1318–1330 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  21. Gong, S. et al. The human placenta exhibits a unique transcriptomic void. Cell Rep. 42, 112800 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  22. Ruano, C. S. M. et al. Alternative splicing in normal and pathological human placentas is correlated to genetic variants. Hum. Genet. 140, 827–848 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  23. Gong, S. et al. The RNA landscape of the human placenta in health and disease. Nat. Commun. 12, 2639 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  24. Harrow, J. et al. GENCODE: the reference human genome annotation for the ENCODE Project. Genome Res 22, 1760–1774 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  25. Baldoni, P. L. et al. Dividing out quantification uncertainty allows efficient assessment of differential transcript expression with edgeR. Nucleic Acids Res. 52, e13–e13 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  26. Singh, N. P., Wu, E. Y., Fan, J., Love, M. I. & Patro, R. Tree-based diff erential testing using inferential uncertainty for RNA-seq. Genome Res. 35, 2326–2338 (2025).

  27. Santos Jr, H. P. et al. Evidence for the placenta-brain axis: multi-omic kernel aggregation predicts intellectual and social impairment in children born extremely preterm. Mol. Autism 11, 97 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  28. Soh, S.-E. et al. Insights from the Growing Up in Singapore Towards Healthy Outcomes (GUSTO) Cohort Study. Ann. Nutr. Metab. 64, 218–225 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  29. Guillemette, L. et al. Genetics of Glucose regulation in Gestation and Growth (Gen3G): a prospective prebirth cohort of mother–child pairs in Sherbrooke, Canada. BMJ Open 6, e010031 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  30. Paquette, A. et al. A genome scale transcriptional regulatory model of the human placenta. Sci. Adv. 10, eadf3411 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  31. Tekola-Ayele, F. et al. Placental multi-omics integration identifies candidate functional genes for birthweight. Nat. Commun. 13, 2384 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  32. Saben, J. et al. A comprehensive analysis of the human placenta transcriptome. Placenta 35, 125–131 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  33. Armstrong, D. L. et al. The core transcriptome of mammalian placentas and the divergence of expression with placental shape. Placenta 57, 71–78 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  34. Baker, B. H. et al. Placental transcriptomic signatures of prenatal and preconceptional maternal stress. Mol. Psychiatry 29, 1179–1191 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  35. Bhattacharya, A. et al. Isoform-level transcriptome-wide association uncovers genetic risk mechanisms for neuropsychiatric disorders in the human brain. Nat. Genet. 55, 2117–2128 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  36. Aguzzoli Heberle, B. et al. Mapping medically relevant RNA isoform diversity in the aged human frontal cortex with deep long-read RNA-seq. Nat. Biotechnol. 43, 635–646 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  37. Wen, C. et al. Cross-ancestry atlas of gene, isoform, and splicing regulation in the developing human brain. Science 384, eadh0829 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  38. Gandal, M. J. et al. Transcriptome-wide isoform-level dysregulation in ASD, schizophrenia, and bipolar disorder. Science 362, eaat8127 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  39. Garrido-Martín, D., Borsari, B., Calvo, M., Reverter, F. & Guigó, R. Identification and analysis of splicing quantitative trait loci across multiple tissues in the human genome. Nat. Commun. 12, 727 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  40. Qi, T. et al. Genetic control of RNA splicing and its distinct role in complex trait variation. Nat. Genet. 54, 1355–1363 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  41. Li, Y. I. et al. RNA splicing is a primary link between genetic variation and disease. Science 352, 600–604 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  42. Kirwan, J. P. et al. TNF-alpha is a predictor of insulin resistance in human pregnancy. Diabetes 51, 2207–2213 (2002).

    Google Scholar 

  43. Jain, M., Olsen, H. E., Paten, B. & Akeson, M. The Oxford Nanopore MinION: delivery of nanopore sequencing to the genomics community. Genome Biol. 17, 239 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  44. Wang, Y., Zhao, Y., Bollas, A., Wang, Y. & Au, K. F. Nanopore sequencing technology, bioinformatics and applications. Nat. Biotechnol. 39, 1348–1365 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  45. Leung, S. K. et al. Full-length transcript sequencing of human and mouse cerebral cortex identifies widespread isoform diversity and alternative splicing. Cell Rep. 37, 110022 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  46. Paniagua, A. et al. Evaluation of strategies for evidence-driven genome annotation using long-read RNA-seq. Genome Res. 35, 1053–1064 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  47. Glinos, D. A. et al. Transcriptome variation in human tissues revealed by long-read sequencing. Nature 621, 857–865 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  48. Veiga, D. F. T. et al. A comprehensive long-read isoform analysis platform and sequencing resource for breast cancer. Sci. Adv. 8, eabg6711 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  49. Gao, Y. et al. ESPRESSO: robust discovery and quantification of transcript isoforms from error-prone long-read RNA-seq data. Sci. Adv. 9, eabq5072 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  50. Han, S. W., Jewell, S., Thomas-Tikhonenko, A. & Barash, Y. Contrasting and combining transcriptome complexity captured by short and long RNA sequencing reads. Genome Res 34, 1624–1635 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  51. Mostafavi, H., Spence, J. P., Naqvi, S. & Pritchard, J. K. Systematic differences in discovery of genetic effects on gene expression and complex traits. Nat. Genet. 55, 1866–1875 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  52. Yong, H. E. J. et al. Increasing maternal age associates with lower placental CPT1B mRNA expression and acylcarnitines, particularly in overweight women. Front. Physiol. 14, 1166827 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  53. Gorlova, O., Fedorov, A., Logothetis, C., Amos, C. & Gorlov, I. Genes with a large intronic burden show greater evolutionary conservation on the protein level. BMC Evol. Biol. 14, 50 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  54. Smith, M. A., Gesell, T., Stadler, P. F. & Mattick, J. S. Widespread purifying selection on RNA structure in mammals. Nucleic Acids Res. 41, 8220–8236 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  55. Haerty, W. & Ponting, C. P. Mutations within lncRNAs are effectively selected against in fruitfly but not in human. Genome Biol. 14, R49 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  56. W.-W. Liang, et al. Transcriptome-scale RNA-targeting CRISPR screens reveal essential lncRNAs in human cells. https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.30370171 (2024)

  57. Schüler, A., Ghanbarian, A. T. & Hurst, L. D. Purifying selection on splice-related motifs, not expression level nor RNA folding, explains nearly all constraint on human lincRNAs. Mol. Biol. Evol. 31, 3164–3183 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  58. Palazzo, A. F. & Lee, E. S. Non-coding RNA: what is functional and what is junk? Front. Genet. 6, 2 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  59. Mattick, J. S. et al. Long non-coding RNAs: definitions, functions, challenges and recommendations. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 24, 430–447 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  60. Gonzalez, T. L. et al. High-throughput mRNA-seq atlas of human placenta shows vast transcriptome remodeling from first to third trimester. Biol. Reprod. 110, 936–949 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  61. Männik, J. et al. Differential expression profile of Growth Hormone/Chorionic Somatomammotropin genes in placenta of small- and large-for-gestational-age newborns. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 95, 2433–2442 (2010).

    Google Scholar 

  62. Kang, Y.-J. et al. CPC2: a fast and accurate coding potential calculator based on sequence intrinsic features. Nucleic Acids Res. 45, W12–W16 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  63. Camacho, C. et al. BLAST+: architecture and applications. BMC Bioinforma. 10, 421 (2009).

    Google Scholar 

  64. Lin, Z. et al. Alternative strategy to explore missing proteins with low molecular weight. J. Proteome Res. 18, 4180–4188 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  65. Wei, Y., He, A., Huang, Z., Liu, J. & Li, R. Placental and plasma early predictive biomarkers for gestational diabetes mellitus. PROTEOMICS – Clin. Appl. 16, 2200001 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  66. Rasanen, J. P. et al. Glycosylated fibronectin as a first-trimester biomarker for prediction of gestational diabetes. Obstet. Gynecol. 122, 586–594 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  67. Li, H. W., Cheung, A. N. Y., Tsao, S. W. & Cheung, A. L. M. Expression of E-cadherin and beta-catenin in trophoblastic tissue in normal and pathological pregnancies. Int. J. Gynecol. Pathol. 22, 63–70 (2003).

    Google Scholar 

  68. Lin, J. et al. Proteomic analysis of plasma total exosomes and placenta-derived exosomes in patients with gestational diabetes mellitus in the first and second trimesters. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 24, 713 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  69. Villota, S. D., Toledo-Rodriguez, M. & Leach, L. Compromised barrier integrity of human feto-placental vessels from gestational diabetic pregnancies is related to downregulation of occludin expression. Diabetologia 64, 195–210 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  70. Hannan, N. J., Jones, R. L., White, C. A. & Salamonsen, L. A. The chemokines, CX3CL1, CCL14, and CCL4, Promote human trophoblast migration at the feto-maternal interface1. Biol. Reprod. 74, 896–904 (2006).

    Google Scholar 

  71. Zhu, A., Srivastava, A., Ibrahim, J. G., Patro, R. & Love, M. I. Nonparametric expression analysis using inferential replicate counts. Nucleic Acids Res. 47, e105–e105 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  72. Risso, D., Ngai, J., Speed, T. P. & Dudoit, S. Normalization of RNA-seq data using factor analysis of control genes or samples. Nat. Biotechnol. 32, 896–902 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  73. Zeng, P., Shao, Z. & Zhou, X. Statistical methods for mediation analysis in the era of high-throughput genomics: current successes and future challenges. Comput. Struct. Biotechnol. J. 19, 3209–3224 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  74. Zhao, Y., Lindquist, M. A. & Caffo, B. S. Sparse principal component based high-dimensional mediation analysis. Comput. Stat. Data Anal. 142, 106835 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  75. Hanna, C. W. Placental imprinting: emerging mechanisms and functions. PLOS Genet 16, e1008709 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  76. Yuan, V. et al. Cell-specific characterization of the placental methylome. BMC Genomics 22, 6 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  77. Schroeder, D. I. et al. The human placenta methylome. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 110, 6037–6042 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  78. Schroeder, D. I. et al. Early developmental and evolutionary origins of gene body DNA methylation patterns in mammalian placentas. PLOS Genet 11, e1005442 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  79. Cole, N., Wu, W., Head, S. T., Bresnahan, S. T. & Bhattacharya, A. Quantification method affects replicability of eQTL analysis, colocalization, and TWAS. Preprint at bioRxiv https://doi.org/10.1101/2025.08.20.671303 (2025).

  80. Jacob, A. G. & Smith, C. W. J. Intron retention as a component of regulated gene expression programs. Hum. Genet. 136, 1043–1057 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  81. Alharbi, A. B. et al. Ctcf haploinsufficiency mediates intron retention in a tissue-specific manner. RNA Biol. 18, 93–103 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  82. Ullrich, S. & Guigó, R. Dynamic changes in intron retention are tightly associated with regulation of splicing factors and proliferative activity during B-cell development. Nucleic Acids Res 48, 1327–1340 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  83. Hadar, S., Meller, A., Saida, N. & Shalgi, R. Stress-induced transcriptional readthrough into neighboring genes is linked to intron retention. iScience 25, 105543 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  84. Pabis, K. et al. A concerted increase in readthrough and intron retention drives transposon expression during aging and senescence. eLife 12, RP87811 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  85. Keighley, L. M., Lynch-Sutherland, C. F., Almomani, S. N., Eccles, M. R. & Macaulay, E. C. Unveiling the hidden players: the crucial role of transposable elements in the placenta and their potential contribution to pre-eclampsia. Placenta 141, 57–64 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  86. Frost, J. M. et al. Regulation of human trophoblast gene expression by endogenous retroviruses. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 30, 527–538 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  87. Li, J. et al. Isoform usage as a distinct regulatory layer driving nutrient-responsive metabolic adaptation. Cell Metab. 37, 772–787.e6 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  88. Verta, J.-P. & Jacobs, A. The role of alternative splicing in adaptation and evolution. Trends Ecol. Evol. 37, 299–308 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  89. Huang, J. Y. Leveraging molecular negative controls for effect estimation in non-randomized human health and disease studies: a demonstrative simulation study. ICML 2021 Neglected Assumptions in Causal Inference Workshop (accepted pre-print). (2021).

  90. Sommer, J. et al. Optimal timing for RNA isolation: recommendations for placenta sample collection under clinical conditions. Placenta 161, 52–54 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  91. Bhattacharya, A. et al. Placental genomics mediates genetic associations with complex health traits and disease. Nat. Commun. 13, 706 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  92. Peng, S. et al. Expression quantitative trait loci (eQTLs) in human placentas suggest developmental origins of complex diseases. Hum. Mol. Genet. 26, 3432–3441 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  93. Gardner, A. & Úbeda, F. The meaning of intragenomic conflict. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 1, 1807–1815 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  94. Soliman, H. K. & Coughlan, J. M. United by conflict: convergent signatures of parental conflict in angiosperms and placental mammals. J. Hered. 115, 625–642 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  95. Kobayashi, E. H. et al. Genomic imprinting in human placentation. Reprod. Med. Biol. 21, e12490 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  96. Vincenz, C., Lovett, J. L., Wu, W., Shedden, K. & Strassmann, B. I. Loss of imprinting in human placentas is widespread, coordinated, and predicts birth phenotypes. Mol. Biol. Evol. 37, 429–441 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  97. Pasquesi, G. I. M. et al. Regulation of human interferon signaling by transposon exonization. Cell 187, 7621–7636.e19 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  98. Arribas, Y. A. et al. Transposable element exonization generates a reservoir of evolving and functional protein isoforms. Cell 187, 7603–7620.e22 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  99. Miao, B. et al. Tissue-specific usage of transposable element-derived promoters in mouse development. Genome Biol. 21, 255 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  100. Lee, H. J. et al. Epigenomic analysis reveals prevalent contribution of transposable elements to cis -regulatory elements, tissue-specific expression, and alternative promoters in zebrafish. Genome Res. 32, 1424–1436 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  101. Lynch, V. J. et al. Ancient transposable elements transformed the uterine regulatory landscape and transcriptome during the evolution of mammalian pregnancy. Cell Rep. 10, 551–561 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  102. Fitzgerald, E. et al. Hofbauer cell function in the term placenta associates with adult cardiovascular and depressive outcomes. Nat. Commun. 14, 7120 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  103. Hivert, M.-F. et al. Placental IGFBP1 levels during early pregnancy and the risk of insulin resistance and gestational diabetes. Nat. Med. 30, 1689–1695 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  104. Mak, Q. X. C. et al. Polishing de novo nanopore assemblies of bacteria and eukaryotes with FMLRC2. Mol. Biol. Evol. 40, msad048 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  105. Li, H. New strategies to improve minimap2 alignment accuracy. Bioinformatics 37, 4572–4574 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  106. Li, H. et al. The sequence Alignment/Map format and SAMtools. Bioinformatics 25, 2078–2079 (2009).

    Google Scholar 

  107. R Core Team. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. (R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria, 2024).

  108. Pardo-Palacios, F. J. et al. SQANTI3: curation of long-read transcriptomes for accurate identification of known and novel isoforms. Nat. Methods 21, 793–797 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  109. Haas, B. J. et al. De novo transcript sequence reconstruction from RNA-seq using the Trinity platform for reference generation and analysis. Nat. Protoc. 8, 1494–1512 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  110. Jain, A. & Tuteja, G. TissueEnrich: tissue-specific gene enrichment analysis. Bioinformatics 35, 1966–1967 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  111. Noguchi, S. et al. FANTOM5 CAGE profiles of human and mouse samples. Sci. Data 4, 170112 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  112. You, L. et al. APASdb: a database describing alternative poly(A) sites and selection of heterogeneous cleavage sites downstream of poly(A) signals. Nucleic Acids Res 43, D59–D67 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  113. Zhang, H. PolyA_DB: a database for mammalian mRNA polyadenylation. Nucleic Acids Res 33, D116–D120 (2004).

    Google Scholar 

  114. Dobin, A. et al. STAR: ultrafast universal RNA-seq aligner. Bioinformatics 29, 15–21 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  115. Martin, M. Cutadapt removes adapter sequences from high-throughput sequencing reads. EMBnet. J. 17, 10–12 (2011).

    Google Scholar 

  116. Haberle, V., Forrest, A. R. R., Hayashizaki, Y., Carninci, P. & Lenhard, B. CAGEr: precise TSS data retrieval and high-resolution promoterome mining for integrative analyses. Nucleic Acids Res. 43, e51–e51 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  117. Quinlan, A. R. & Hall, I. M. BEDTools: a flexible suite of utilities for comparing genomic features. Bioinformatics 26, 841–842 (2010).

    Google Scholar 

  118. Yalamanchili, H. K. et al. PolyA-miner: accurate assessment of differential alternative poly-adenylation from 3′Seq data using vector projections and non-negative matrix factorization. Nucleic Acids Res. 48, e69–e69 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  119. Chen, S., Zhou, Y., Chen, Y. & Gu, J. fastp: an ultra-fast all-in-one FASTQ preprocessor. Bioinformatics 34, i884–i890 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  120. Patro, R., Duggal, G., Love, M. I., Irizarry, R. A. & Kingsford, C. Salmon provides fast and bias-aware quantification of transcript expression. Nat. Methods 14, 417–419 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  121. Kille, B., Garrison, E., Treangen, T. J. & Phillippy, A. M. Minmers are a generalization of minimizers that enable unbiased local Jaccard estimation. Bioinformatics 39, btad512 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  122. Soneson, C., Love, M. I. & Robinson, M. D. Differential analyses for RNA-seq: transcript-level estimates improve gene-level inferences. F1000Research 4, 1521 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  123. Love, M. I., Huber, W. & Anders, S. Moderated estimation of fold change and dispersion for RNA-seq data with DESeq2. Genome Biol. 15, 550 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  124. Imai, K., Keele, L. & Tingley, D. A general approach to causal mediation analysis. Psychol. Methods 15, 309–334 (2010).

    Google Scholar 

  125. Tingley, D., Yamamoto, T., Hirose, K., Keele, L. & Imai, K. mediation: R Package for Causal Mediation Analysis. J. Stat. Softw. 59, 1–38 (2014).

  126. Rosseel, Y. lavaan: an R package for structural equation modeling. J. Stat. Softw. 48, 1–36 (2012).

  127. Ben-Shachar, M., Lüdecke, D. & Makowski, D. effectsize: estimation of effect size indices and standardized parameters. J. Open Source Softw. 5, 2815 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  128. Vasimuddin, M., Misra, S., Li, H. & Aluru, S. Efficient Architecture-Aware Acceleration of BWA-MEM for Multicore Systems. in 2019 IEEE International Parallel and Distributed Processing Symposium (IPDPS) 314–324 (IEEE, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, 2019).

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank the GUSTO, Gen3G, and NUH prebirth cohort study participants and their families, and the related staff and study teams, without whom this study would not be possible. We also thank members of both the Bhattacharya and Huang labs for critical reading of our manuscript, and members of the Love lab for feedback on methods. The GUSTO study is supported by the National Research Foundation (NRF) under its Translational and Clinical Research (TCR) Flagship Program (NMRC/TCR/004-NUS/2008 and NMRC/TCR/012-NUHS/2014 to S.-Y.C.) and the Open Fund-Large Collaborative Grant (MOH-000504 to S.-Y.C.) administered by the Singapore Ministry of Health’s National Medical Research Council (NMRC) and the Agency for Science, Technology and Research (A*STAR). Additional funding is provided by the Institute for Human Development and Potential (IHDP), A*STAR. The Gen3G study was initially supported by a Fonds de recherche du Québec—Santé operating grant (20697 to M.-F.H.), Canadian Institute of Health Research (CIHR) operating grants (MOP 115071 to M.-F.H.) and a Diabète Québec grant, and placental short-read RNA sequencing was supported by NICHD (R01HD94150 to M.-F.H.). Placental long-read RNA sequencing was supported by an NMRC Open Fund-Young Individual Research Grant (MOH-000550-00 to J.Y.H.). J.Y.H. was also supported by an A*STAR Human Health and Potential–Prenatal/Early Childhood Grant (H24P2M0002) and Pilot Projects Program funding from the NIMHD RCMI-CC (U24MD015970).

Author information

Author notes
  1. These authors jointly supervised this work: Jonathan Y. Huang, Arjun Bhattacharya.

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Epidemiology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA

    Sean T. Bresnahan & Arjun Bhattacharya

  2. A*STAR Institute for Human Development and Potential, Singapore, Singapore

    Hannah E. J. Yong, Shiao-Yng Chan & Jonathan Y. Huang

  3. Department of BioSciences, Rice University, Houston, TX, USA

    Aryun Nemani & William H. Wu

  4. Department of Public Health Sciences, The University of Hawaiʻi at Mānoa, Honolulu, HI, USA

    Sierra Lopez & Jonathan Y. Huang

  5. KK Women’s and Children’s Hospital, Singapore, Singapore

    Jerry Kok Yen Chan

  6. Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore, Singapore

    Jerry Kok Yen Chan & Jonathan Y. Huang

  7. Department of Biology, Université de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, QC, Canada

    Frédérique White & Pierre-Étienne Jacques

  8. Diabetes Unit, Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA

    Marie-France Hivert

  9. Department of Medicine, Université de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, QC, Canada

    Marie-France Hivert

  10. Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore

    Shiao-Yng Chan

  11. Departments of Genetics & Biostatistics, University of North Carolina—Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA

    Michael I. Love

  12. Institute for Data Science in Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA

    Arjun Bhattacharya

Authors
  1. Sean T. Bresnahan
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Hannah E. J. Yong
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Aryun Nemani
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  4. William H. Wu
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Sierra Lopez
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Jerry Kok Yen Chan
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Frédérique White
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Pierre-Étienne Jacques
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Marie-France Hivert
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  10. Shiao-Yng Chan
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  11. Michael I. Love
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  12. Jonathan Y. Huang
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  13. Arjun Bhattacharya
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

S.T.B., J.Y.H., and A.B. designed the study. M.-F.H. managed the Gen3G study and S.-Y.C. managed the GUSTO study. H.E.J.Y., J.K.Y.C., F.W., and P.-E.J. managed data from these studies. S.T.B. directed bioinformatic and statistical analyses and wrote the initial draft of the manuscript. W.H.W. and S.L. contributed to bioinformatic and statistical analyses. A.N. designed the Shiny app. M.I.L. consulted on bioinformatic and statistical analyses. All authors contributed to the writing and editing of the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sean T. Bresnahan.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Peer review

Peer review information

Nature Communications thanks the anonymous reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work. A peer review file is available.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Information (download PDF )

Description of Additional Supplementary Files (download PDF )

Supplementary Data 1-17 (download ZIP )

Reporting Summary (download PDF )

Transparent Peer Review file (download PDF )

Source data

Source Data (download ZIP )

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if you modified the licensed material. You do not have permission under this licence to share adapted material derived from this article or parts of it. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Bresnahan, S.T., Yong, H.E.J., Nemani, A. et al. Long-read assembly reveals vast transcriptional complexity in the placenta associated with metabolic and endocrine function. Nat Commun (2026). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-026-71303-4

Download citation

  • Received: 02 September 2025

  • Accepted: 19 March 2026

  • Published: 02 April 2026

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-026-71303-4

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

Download PDF

Advertisement

Explore content

  • Research articles
  • Reviews & Analysis
  • News & Comment
  • Videos
  • Collections
  • Subjects
  • Follow us on Facebook
  • Follow us on X
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed

About the journal

  • Aims & Scope
  • Editors
  • Journal Information
  • Open Access Fees and Funding
  • Calls for Papers
  • Editorial Values Statement
  • Journal Metrics
  • Editors' Highlights
  • Contact
  • Editorial policies
  • Top Articles

Publish with us

  • For authors
  • For Reviewers
  • Language editing services
  • Open access funding
  • Submit manuscript

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

  • Explore articles by subject
  • Find a job
  • Guide to authors
  • Editorial policies

Nature Communications (Nat Commun)

ISSN 2041-1723 (online)

nature.com footer links

About Nature Portfolio

  • About us
  • Press releases
  • Press office
  • Contact us

Discover content

  • Journals A-Z
  • Articles by subject
  • protocols.io
  • Nature Index

Publishing policies

  • Nature portfolio policies
  • Open access

Author & Researcher services

  • Reprints & permissions
  • Research data
  • Language editing
  • Scientific editing
  • Nature Masterclasses
  • Research Solutions

Libraries & institutions

  • Librarian service & tools
  • Librarian portal
  • Open research
  • Recommend to library

Advertising & partnerships

  • Advertising
  • Partnerships & Services
  • Media kits
  • Branded content

Professional development

  • Nature Awards
  • Nature Careers
  • Nature Conferences

Regional websites

  • Nature Africa
  • Nature China
  • Nature India
  • Nature Japan
  • Nature Middle East
  • Privacy Policy
  • Use of cookies
  • Legal notice
  • Accessibility statement
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Your US state privacy rights
Springer Nature

© 2026 Springer Nature Limited

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing