Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Advertisement

Nature Communications
  • View all journals
  • Search
  • My Account Login
  • Content Explore content
  • About the journal
  • Publish with us
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed
  1. nature
  2. nature communications
  3. articles
  4. article
Generalization of fear learning is shaped by inhibitory sensory processing in mice
Download PDF
Download PDF
  • Article
  • Open access
  • Published: 03 April 2026

Generalization of fear learning is shaped by inhibitory sensory processing in mice

  • Alper K. Bakir  ORCID: orcid.org/0009-0004-7403-08751,
  • Ankur A. Gaikwad  ORCID: orcid.org/0009-0003-0679-72091,
  • Natalia Efimova1,
  • Katharina L. L. Clark1,
  • Michelle C. Rosenthal1 &
  • …
  • John P. McGann  ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0003-2233-75041,2,3 

Nature Communications , Article number:  (2026) Cite this article

We are providing an unedited version of this manuscript to give early access to its findings. Before final publication, the manuscript will undergo further editing. Please note there may be errors present which affect the content, and all legal disclaimers apply.

Subjects

  • Fear conditioning
  • Olfactory bulb
  • Sensory processing

Abstract

When an organism learns that a sensory stimulus predicts a threat, the brain’s neural representation of the stimulus somehow incorporates that information into early sensory processing. That altered sensory processing may causally shape the organism’s response to the stimulus. We used contextual fear conditioning in mice to induce odor avoidance that generalized across odors in proportion to their similarity to the conditioning odor. Visualization of odor representations in vivo revealed they were being reshaped by reductions in GABAB receptor-mediated inhibitory signaling in the presynaptic terminals of the olfactory nerve and downstream neurons in proportion to the generalized fear of each odor. Locally blocking GABAB receptors in the olfactory bulb caused mice to switch from generalizing fear in proportion to similarity to instead overgeneralizing fear to all odors equally. Learning-induced sensory plasticity thus plays a causal role in shaping fear generalization.

Data availability

Source data underlying the figures are provided with this paper. Processed datasets and analysis code are available at Zenodo (https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18809357). Raw imaging data are not publicly available due to their large file size and will be made available by the corresponding author upon request. Source data are provided with this paper.

Code availability

Code used for analyzing the data is deposited at Zenodo (https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18809357).

References

  1. Morey, R. A. et al. Fear learning circuitry is biased toward generalization of fear associations in posttraumatic stress disorder. Transl. Psychiatry 5, e700 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Dunsmoor, J. E. & Paz, R. Fear generalization and anxiety: behavioral and neural mechanisms. Biol. Psychiatry 78, 336–343 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Asok, A., Kandel, E. R. & Rayman, J. B. The neurobiology of fear generalization. Front. Behav. Neurosci. 12, 329 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Bar-Haim, Y., Lamy, D., Pergamin, L., Bakermans-Kranenburg, M. J. & van, I. M. H. Threat-related attentional bias in anxious and nonanxious individuals: a meta-analytic study. Psychol. Bull. 133, 1–24 (2007).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Fraunfelter, L., Gerdes, A. B. M. & Alpers, G. W. Fear one, fear them all: a systematic review and meta-analysis of fear generalization in pathological anxiety. Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 139, 104707 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Gerdes, A. B. M., Fraunfelter, L. & Alpers, G. W. Hear it, fear it: fear generalizes from conditioned pictures to semantically related sounds. J. Anxiety Disord. 69, 102174 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Dunsmoor, J. E., Ahs, F. & Labar, K. S. Neurocognitive mechanisms of fear conditioning and vulnerability to anxiety. Front. Hum. Neurosci. 5, 35 (2011).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Dunsmoor, J. E., Kroes, M. C., Braren, S. H. & Phelps, E. A. Threat intensity widens fear generalization gradients. Behav. Neurosci. 131, 168–175 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Lissek, S. et al. Overgeneralization of conditioned fear as a pathogenic marker of panic disorder. Am. J. Psychiatry 167, 47–55 (2010).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Krusemark, E. A. & Li, W. From early sensory specialization to later perceptual generalization: dynamic temporal progression in perceiving individual threats. J. Neurosci. Off. J. Soc. Neurosci. 33, 587–594 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Bieszczad, K. M., Miasnikov, A. A. & Weinberger, N. M. Remodeling sensory cortical maps implants specific behavioral memory. Neuroscience 246, 40–51 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  12. Gdalyahu, A. et al. Associative fear learning enhances sparse network coding in primary sensory cortex. Neuron 75, 121–132 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  13. Sacco, T. & Sacchetti, B. Role of secondary sensory cortices in emotional memory storage and retrieval in rats. Science 329, 649–656 (2010).

    Google Scholar 

  14. Chen, C. F., Barnes, D. C. & Wilson, D. A. Generalized vs. stimulus-specific learned fear differentially modifies stimulus encoding in primary sensory cortex of awake rats. J. Neurophysiol. 106, 3136–3144 (2011).

    Google Scholar 

  15. Schreiner, C. E. & Polley, D. B. Auditory map plasticity: diversity in causes and consequences. Curr. Opin. Neurobiol. 24, 143–156 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  16. Jones, S. V., Choi, D. C., Davis, M. & Ressler, K. J. Learning-dependent structural plasticity in the adult olfactory pathway. J. Neurosci.: Off. J. Soc. Neurosci. 28, 13106–13111 (2008).

    Google Scholar 

  17. Morrison, F. G., Dias, B. G. & Ressler, K. J. Extinction reverses olfactory fear-conditioned increases in neuron number and glomerular size. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 112, 12846–12851 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  18. Galambos, R., Sheatz, G. & Vernier, V. G. Electrophysiological correlates of a conditioned response in cats. Science 123, 376–377 (1956).

    Google Scholar 

  19. Walters, E. T. & Byrne, J. H. Associative conditioning of single sensory neurons suggests a cellular mechanism for learning. Science 219, 405–408 (1983).

    Google Scholar 

  20. Li, W., Howard, J. D., Parrish, T. B. & Gottfried, J. A. Aversive learning enhances perceptual and cortical discrimination of indiscriminable odor cues. Science 319, 1842–1845 (2008).

    Google Scholar 

  21. Clancy, K., Ding, M., Bernat, E., Schmidt, N. B. & Li, W. Restless ‘rest’: intrinsic sensory hyperactivity and disinhibition in post-traumatic stress disorder. Brain: a J. Neurol. 140, 2041–2050 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  22. McGann, J. P. Associative learning and sensory neuroplasticity: How does it happen and what is it good for? Learn. Mem. 22, 567–576 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  23. Guttman, N. & Kalish, H. I. Discriminability and stimulus generalization. J. Exp. Psychol. 51, 79–88 (1956).

    Google Scholar 

  24. Laxmi, T. R., Stork, O. & Pape, H. C. Generalisation of conditioned fear and its behavioural expression in mice. Behav. Brain Res. 145, 89–98 (2003).

    Google Scholar 

  25. Rosenthal, M. C., Bacallao, M. A., Garcia, A. T. & McGann, J. P. High trait anxiety blocks olfactory plasticity induced by aversive learning. Biol. Psychol. 170, 108324 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  26. Cavazzana, A., Poletti, S. C., Guducu, C., Larsson, M. & Hummel, T. Electro-olfactogram responses before and after aversive olfactory conditioning in humans. Neuroscience 373, 199–206 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  27. Ahs, F., Miller, S. S., Gordon, A. R. & Lundstrom, J. N. Aversive learning increases sensory detection sensitivity. Biol. Psychol. 92, 135–141 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  28. Fletcher, M. L. Olfactory aversive conditioning alters olfactory bulb mitral/tufted cell glomerular odor responses. Front. Syst. Neurosci. 6, 16 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  29. Ross, J. M. & Fletcher, M. L. Learning-dependent and -independent enhancement of mitral/tufted cell glomerular odor responses following olfactory fear conditioning in awake mice. J. Neurosci. Off. J. Soc. Neurosci. 38, 4623–4640 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  30. Kass, M. D., Rosenthal, M. C., Pottackal, J. & McGann, J. P. Fear learning enhances neural responses to threat-predictive sensory stimuli. Science 342, 1389–1392 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  31. Bhattarai, J. P., Schreck, M., Moberly, A. H., Luo, W. & Ma, M. Aversive learning increases release probability of olfactory sensory neurons. Curr. Biol. 30, 31–41 (2020).

  32. Kass, M. D. & McGann, J. P. Persistent, generalized hypersensitivity of olfactory bulb interneurons after olfactory fear generalization. Neurobiol. Learn. Mem. 146, 47–57 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  33. Moberly, A. H. et al. Olfactory inputs modulate respiration-related rhythmic activity in the prefrontal cortex and freezing behavior. Nat. Commun. 9, 1528 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  34. Rosenthal, M. C., Bakir, A. K. & McGann, J. P. Generalization and extinction learning alters primary sensory input to the brain. BioRxiv, https://doi.org/10.64898/2026.02.25.708099 (2026).

  35. Mombaerts, P. et al. Visualizing an olfactory sensory map. Cell 87, 675–686 (1996).

    Google Scholar 

  36. Bonino, M., Cantino, D. & Sassoe-Pognetto, M. Cellular and subcellular localization of gamma-aminobutyric acid B receptors in the rat olfactory bulb. Neurosci. Lett. 274, 195–198 (1999).

    Google Scholar 

  37. Aroniadou-Anderjaska, V., Zhou, F. M., Priest, C. A., Ennis, M. & Shipley, M. T. Tonic and synaptically evoked presynaptic inhibition of sensory input to the rat olfactory bulb via GABA(B) heteroreceptors. J. Neurophysiol. 84, 1194–1203 (2000).

    Google Scholar 

  38. Wachowiak, M. et al. Inhibition of olfactory receptor neuron input to olfactory bulb glomeruli mediated by suppression of presynaptic calcium influx. J. Neurophysiol. 94, 2700–2712 (2005).

    Google Scholar 

  39. Margeta-Mitrovic, M., Mitrovic, I., Riley, R. C., Jan, L. Y. & Basbaum, A. I. Immunohistochemical localization of GABA(B) receptors in the rat central nervous system. J. Comp. Neurol. 405, 299–321 (1999).

    Google Scholar 

  40. McGann, J. P. et al. Odorant representations are modulated by intra- but not interglomerular presynaptic inhibition of olfactory sensory neurons. Neuron 48, 1039–1053 (2005).

    Google Scholar 

  41. Murphy, G. J., Darcy, D. P. & Isaacson, J. S. Intraglomerular inhibition: signaling mechanisms of an olfactory microcircuit. Nat. Neurosci. 8, 354–364 (2005).

    Google Scholar 

  42. Pirez, N. & Wachowiak, M. In vivo modulation of sensory input to the olfactory bulb by tonic and activity-dependent presynaptic inhibition of receptor neurons. J. Neurosci. Off. J. Soc. Neurosci. 28, 6360–6371 (2008).

    Google Scholar 

  43. Letzkus, J. J., Wolff, S. B. E. & Lüthi, A. Disinhibition, a circuit mechanism for associative learning and memory. Neuron 88, 264–276 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  44. Wolff, S. B. E. et al. Amygdala interneuron subtypes control fear learning through disinhibition. Nature 509, 453–458 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  45. Letzkus, J. J. et al. A disinhibitory microcircuit for associative fear learning in the auditory cortex. Nature 480, 331–335 (2011).

    Google Scholar 

  46. Akaike, H. A new look at the statistical model identification. IEEE Trans. Autom. Control 19, 716–723 (1974).

    Google Scholar 

  47. Pavlov, I. P. Conditioned Reflexes: an Investigation of the Physiological Activity of the Cerebral Cortex, 142 (Oxford University Press, 1927).

  48. Ghirlanda, S. On elemental and configural models of associative learning. J. Math. Psychol. 64-65, 8–16 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  49. Kass, M. D. et al. Changes in olfactory sensory neuron physiology and olfactory perceptual learning after odorant exposure in adult mice. Chem. Senses 41, 123–133 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  50. Hanson, H. M. Discrimination training effect on stimulus generalization gradient for spectrum stimuli. Science 125, 888–889 (1957).

    Google Scholar 

  51. Hanson, H. M. Effects of discrimination training on stimulus generalization. J. Exp. Psychol. 58, 321 (1959).

    Google Scholar 

  52. Lee, J. C., Hayes, B. K. & Lovibond, P. F. Peak shift and rules in human generalization. J. Exp. Psychol. Learn. Mem. Cogn. 44, 1955 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  53. Sosa, R. & Ramírez, M. N. Conditioned inhibition: historical critiques and controversies in the light of recent advances. J. Exp. Psychol. Anim. Learn. Cogn. 45, 17 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  54. Robinson, J., Whitt, E. J. & Jones, P. M. Familiarity-based stimulus generalization of conditioned suppression. J. Exp. Psychol. Anim. Learn. Cogn. 43, 159 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  55. Panzanelli, P., Lopez-Bendito, G., Lujan, R. & Sassoe-Pognetto, M. Localization and developmental expression of GABA(B) receptors in the rat olfactory bulb. J. Neurocytol. 33, 87–99 (2004).

    Google Scholar 

  56. Kratskin, I. et al. Immunocytochemical localization of the GABAB2 receptor subunit in the glomeruli of the mouse main olfactory bulb. Neurosci. Lett. 402, 121–125 (2006).

    Google Scholar 

  57. Hayar, A. & Ennis, M. Endogenous GABA and glutamate finely tune the bursting of olfactory bulb external tufted cells. J. Neurophysiol. 98, 1052–1056 (2007).

    Google Scholar 

  58. McGaugh, J. L. Involvement of hormonal and neuromodulatory systems in the regulation of memory storage. Annu. Rev. Neurosci. 12, 255–287 (1989).

    Google Scholar 

  59. Kass, M. D. et al. Changes in the neural representation of odorants after olfactory deprivation in the adult mouse olfactory bulb. Chem. Senses 38, 77–89 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  60. Zhou, F. et al. Short-term plasticity in glomerular inhibitory circuits shapes olfactory bulb output. J. Neurophysiol. 123, 1120–1132 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  61. Fletcher, M. L. & Wilson, D. A. Olfactory bulb mitral-tufted cell plasticity: odorant-specific tuning reflects previous odorant exposure. J. Neurosci. 23, 6946–6955 (2003).

    Google Scholar 

  62. Fast, C. D. & McGann, J. P. Amygdalar gating of early sensory processing through interactions with locus coeruleus. J. Neurosci. 37, 3085–3101 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  63. De Saint Jan, D. Target-specific control of olfactory bulb periglomerular cells by GABAergic and cholinergic basal forebrain inputs. Elife 11, e71965 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  64. Yu, B. et al. Cholinergic feedback for modality-and context-specific modulation of sensory representations. Science 38, 1324–1329 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  65. Brunert, D. et al. Cell-type-specific modulation of sensory responses in olfactory bulb circuits by serotonergic projections from the raphe nuclei. J. Neurosci. 36, 6820–6835 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  66. Rothermel, M. et al. Cholinergic inputs from Basal forebrain add an excitatory bias to odor coding in the olfactory bulb. J. Neurosci. 34, 4654–4664 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  67. Boyd, A. M. et al. Broadcasting of cortical activity to the olfactory bulb. Cell Rep. 10, 1032–1039 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  68. McIntyre, J. C. et al. Neuromodulation in chemosensory pathways. Chem. senses 42, 375–379 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  69. Parsa, P. V., D’Souza, R. D. & Vijayaraghavan, S. Signaling between periglomerular cells reveals a bimodal role for GABA in modulating glomerular microcircuitry in the olfactory bulb. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 112, 9478–9483 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  70. Okutani, F., Zhang, J. J., Otsuka, T., Yagi, F. & Kaba, H. Modulation of olfactory learning in young rats through intrabulbar GABA(B) receptors. Eur. J. Neurosci. 18, 2031–2036 (2003).

    Google Scholar 

  71. In ‘t Zandt, E. E., Cansler, H. L., Denson, H. B. & Wesson, D. W. Centrifugal innervation of the olfactory bulb: a reappraisal. eNeuro 6, ENEURO-0390 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  72. Chen, C. & Regehr, W. G. Presynaptic modulation of the retinogeniculate synapse. J. Neurosci. Off. J. Soc. Neurosci. 23, 3130–3135 (2003).

    Google Scholar 

  73. Brenowitz, S., David, J. & Trussell, L. Enhancement of synaptic efficacy by presynaptic GABA(B) receptors. Neuron 20, 135–141 (1998).

    Google Scholar 

  74. Shao, M., Reddaway, R., Hirsch, J. C. & Peusner, K. D. Presynaptic GABA(B) receptors decrease neurotransmitter release in vestibular nuclei neurons during vestibular compensation. Neuroscience 223, 333–354 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  75. Nickell, W. T., Behbehani, M. M. & Shipley, M. T. Evidence for GABAB-mediated inhibition of transmission from the olfactory nerve to mitral cells in the rat olfactory bulb. Brain Res. Bull. 35, 119–123 (1994).

    Google Scholar 

  76. Dunsmoor, J. E., White, A. J. & LaBar, K. S. Conceptual similarity promotes generalization of higher order fear learning. Learn. Mem. 18, 156–160 (2011).

    Google Scholar 

  77. Dunsmoor, J. E., Mitroff, S. R. & LaBar, K. S. Generalization of conditioned fear along a dimension of increasing fear intensity. Learn. Mem. 16, 460–469 (2009).

    Google Scholar 

  78. Dunsmoor, J. E., Martin, A. & LaBar, K. S. Role of conceptual knowledge in learning and retention of conditioned fear. Biol. Psychol. 89, 300–305 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  79. Wisniewski, M. G., Church, B. A. & Mercado, E. 3rd Learning-related shifts in generalization gradients for complex sounds. Learn. Behav. 37, 325–335 (2009).

    Google Scholar 

  80. Wisniewski, M. G., Liu, E. H., Church, B. A. & Mercado, E. 3rd Learning to discriminate frequency modulation rate can benefit and worsen pitch acuity. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 135, EL55–EL60 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  81. Stewart, L. P. & White, P. M. Sensory filtering phenomenology in PTSD. Depress. Anxiety 25, 38–45 (2008).

    Google Scholar 

  82. Wood, K. C., Angeloni, C. F., Oxman, K., Clopath, C. & Geffen, M. N. Neuronal activity in sensory cortex predicts the specificity of learning in mice. Nat. Commun. 13, 1167 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  83. Rosenthal, M. C. et al. An efficient method for quantifying fear conditioning-induced approach/avoidance behavior across multiple olfactory stimuli in mice. BioRxiv https://doi.org/10.64898/2026.02.21.707096 (2026).

    Google Scholar 

  84. Akerboom, J. et al. Optimization of a GCaMP calcium indicator for neural activity imaging. J. Neurosci. Off. J. Soc. Neurosci. 32, 13819–13840 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  85. Chen, T. W. et al. Ultrasensitive fluorescent proteins for imaging neuronal activity. Nature 499, 295–300 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  86. Wachowiak, M. et al. Optical dissection of odor information processing in vivo using GCaMPs expressed in specified cell types of the olfactory bulb. J. Neurosci. Off. J. Soc. Neurosci. 33, 5285–5300 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  87. Guerin, D., Peace, S. T., Didier, A., Linster, C. & Cleland, T. A. Noradrenergic neuromodulation in the olfactory bulb modulates odor habituation and spontaneous discrimination. Behav. Neurosci. 122, 816–826 (2008).

    Google Scholar 

  88. Czarnecki, L. A. et al. Functional rehabilitation of cadmium-induced neurotoxicity despite persistent peripheral pathophysiology in the olfactory system. Toxicol. Sci. Off. J. Soc. Toxicol. 126, 534–544 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  89. Bakir, A. K., & McGann, J. Data and Code for NCOMMS-25-57165A. Zenodo, https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18809358 (2026).

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank David J. Barker, Paul A.S. Breslin, and Louis D. Matzel for their comments on earlier versions of this work. This work was supported by the National Institute of Mental Health and National Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders (R01MH101293, J.P.M.).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Behavioral and Systems Neuroscience, Psychology Department, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, Piscataway, NJ, US

    Alper K. Bakir, Ankur A. Gaikwad, Natalia Efimova, Katharina L. L. Clark, Michelle C. Rosenthal & John P. McGann

  2. Rutgers Center for Cognitive Science, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, Piscataway, NJ, US

    John P. McGann

  3. Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Rutgers Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, New Brunswick, NJ, US

    John P. McGann

Authors
  1. Alper K. Bakir
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Ankur A. Gaikwad
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Natalia Efimova
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Katharina L. L. Clark
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Michelle C. Rosenthal
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  6. John P. McGann
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

A.K.B. and J.P.M. conceptualized the study, designed the experiments and wrote the manuscript. A.K.B. performed the surgeries, experiments, and analyses. A.A.G., N.E., and K.L.L.C. assisted with cannula surgeries, analysis, training, and testing in the open-field arena. M.C.R., A.A.G., and K.L.L.C. contributed to pilot work and development of the open-field setup.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Alper K. Bakir or John P. McGann.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Peer review

Peer review information

Nature Communications thanks Minghong Ma who co-reviewed with Janardhan Bhattarai; and the other, anonymous, reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work. A peer review file is available.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Information (download PDF )

Reporting Summary (download PDF )

Transparent Peer Review file (download PDF )

Source data

Source Data (download XLSX )

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Bakir, A.K., Gaikwad, A.A., Efimova, N. et al. Generalization of fear learning is shaped by inhibitory sensory processing in mice. Nat Commun (2026). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-026-71356-5

Download citation

  • Received: 22 July 2025

  • Accepted: 17 March 2026

  • Published: 03 April 2026

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-026-71356-5

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

Download PDF

Advertisement

Explore content

  • Research articles
  • Reviews & Analysis
  • News & Comment
  • Videos
  • Collections
  • Subjects
  • Follow us on Facebook
  • Follow us on X
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed

About the journal

  • Aims & Scope
  • Editors
  • Journal Information
  • Open Access Fees and Funding
  • Calls for Papers
  • Editorial Values Statement
  • Journal Metrics
  • Editors' Highlights
  • Contact
  • Editorial policies
  • Top Articles

Publish with us

  • For authors
  • For Reviewers
  • Language editing services
  • Open access funding
  • Submit manuscript

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

  • Explore articles by subject
  • Find a job
  • Guide to authors
  • Editorial policies

Nature Communications (Nat Commun)

ISSN 2041-1723 (online)

nature.com footer links

About Nature Portfolio

  • About us
  • Press releases
  • Press office
  • Contact us

Discover content

  • Journals A-Z
  • Articles by subject
  • protocols.io
  • Nature Index

Publishing policies

  • Nature portfolio policies
  • Open access

Author & Researcher services

  • Reprints & permissions
  • Research data
  • Language editing
  • Scientific editing
  • Nature Masterclasses
  • Research Solutions

Libraries & institutions

  • Librarian service & tools
  • Librarian portal
  • Open research
  • Recommend to library

Advertising & partnerships

  • Advertising
  • Partnerships & Services
  • Media kits
  • Branded content

Professional development

  • Nature Awards
  • Nature Careers
  • Nature Conferences

Regional websites

  • Nature Africa
  • Nature China
  • Nature India
  • Nature Japan
  • Nature Middle East
  • Privacy Policy
  • Use of cookies
  • Legal notice
  • Accessibility statement
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Your US state privacy rights
Springer Nature

© 2026 Springer Nature Limited

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing