Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Advertisement

Nature Communications
  • View all journals
  • Search
  • My Account Login
  • Content Explore content
  • About the journal
  • Publish with us
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed
  1. nature
  2. nature communications
  3. articles
  4. article
Immune-deficient bacteria serve as gateways to genetic exchange and microbial evolution
Download PDF
Download PDF
  • Article
  • Open access
  • Published: 01 April 2026

Immune-deficient bacteria serve as gateways to genetic exchange and microbial evolution

  • Wendy Figueroa  ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0003-0882-51061,2 na1,
  • Akshay Sabnis1,2 na1,
  • Rodrigo Ibarra-Chávez  ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0002-9056-30553,4,
  • Jamie Gorzynski  ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0002-4921-97895,
  • J. Ross Fitzgerald  ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0002-9233-84685 &
  • …
  • José R. Penadés  ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0002-6439-52621,2,6 

Nature Communications (2026) Cite this article

  • 3395 Accesses

  • 30 Altmetric

  • Metrics details

We are providing an unedited version of this manuscript to give early access to its findings. Before final publication, the manuscript will undergo further editing. Please note there may be errors present which affect the content, and all legal disclaimers apply.

Subjects

  • Bacterial evolution
  • Bacterial genes
  • Pathogens
  • Phage biology

Abstract

Horizontal gene transfer plays a key role in bacterial evolution, yet its efficiency under natural conditions, especially between genetically distinct strains, remains unclear. Using Staphylococcus aureus as a model, we found that gene transfer via various mechanisms is significantly restricted between strains from different clonal complexes (CCs), with the notable exception of lateral transduction, which occurs at high frequency. Interestingly, some strains exhibited a promiscuous ability to accept diverse mobile genetic elements. These strains were defective in key immune defences, specifically the Type I restriction-modification systems that normally protect against foreign DNA. A broader analysis revealed that such immune-deficient mutants are widespread within S. aureus populations. Our study uncovered a trade-off that may account for their persistence in nature: although these mutants are more susceptible to phage attack, they gain an evolutionary advantage by acquiring new genes - such as those conferring antibiotic resistance - which would enhance survival under selective pressure. These immune-deficient cells act as gateways for foreign DNA, which, once integrated and advantageous, can spread within the same CC. Our findings highlight the role of immune-deficient bacteria in facilitating the emergence of novel virulence factors and antibiotic resistance, emphasising their importance in shaping bacterial evolution.

Similar content being viewed by others

The defensome of complex bacterial communities

Article Open access 08 March 2024

Staphylococcus aureus ST764-SCCmecII high-risk clone in bloodstream infections revealed through national genomic surveillance integrating clinical data

Article Open access 19 March 2025

Immune-mediated competition benefits protective microbes over pathogens in a novel host species

Article Open access 09 November 2022

Data availability

The genomics data generated in this study have been deposited in the GenBank database under accession code BioProject ID PRJNA1177260. The experimental data generated in this study are provided in the Source data file. Source data are provided with this paper.

References

  1. Griffith, F. The significance of pneumococcal types. J. Hyg. 27, 113–159 (1928).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Avery, oT., Macleod, cM. & Mccarty, m Studies on the chemical nature of the substance inducing transformation of pneumococcal types: induction of transformation by a desoxyribonucleic acid fraction isolated from pneumococcus type III. J. Exp. Med. 79, 137–158 (1944).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Johnston, C., Martin, B., Fichant, G., Polard, P. & Claverys, J.-P. Bacterial transformation: distribution, shared mechanisms and divergent control. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 12, 181–196 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Blokesch, M. Natural competence for transformation. Curr. Biol. 26, R1126–R1130 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Lederberg, J. & Tatum, E. L. Gene recombination in Escherichia coli. Nature 158, 558 (1946).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Waksman, G. Molecular basis of conjugation-mediated DNA transfer by Gram-negative bacteria. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 90, 102978 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Zinder, N. D. & Lederberg, J. Genetic exchange in Salmonella. J. Bacteriol. 64, 679–699 (1952).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Brüssow, H., Canchaya, C. & Hardt, W.-D. Phages and the evolution of bacterial pathogens: from genomic rearrangements to lysogenic conversion. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 68, 560–602 (2004).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Johnson, C. M. & Grossman, A. D. Integrative and conjugative elements (ICEs): what they do and how they work. Annu. Rev. Genet. 49, 577–601 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Ramsay, J. P. & Firth, N. Diverse mobilization strategies facilitate transfer of non-conjugative mobile genetic elements. Curr. Opin. Microbiol. 38, 1–9 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Coluzzi, C., Garcillán-Barcia, M. P., de la Cruz, F. & Rocha, E. P. C. Evolution of plasmid mobility: origin and fate of conjugative and nonconjugative plasmids. Mol. Biol. Evol. 39, msac115 (2022).

  12. Penadés, J. R., Seed, K. D., Chen, J., Bikard, D. & Rocha, E. P. C. Genetics, ecology and evolution of phage satellites. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41579-025-01156-z (2025).

  13. Doron, S. et al. Systematic discovery of antiphage defense systems in the microbial pangenome. Science 359, eaar4120 (2018).

  14. Bernheim, A. & Sorek, R. The pan-immune system of bacteria: antiviral defence as a community resource. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 18, 113–119 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  15. Fillol-Salom, A. et al. Bacteriophages benefit from mobilizing pathogenicity islands encoding immune systems against competitors. Cell 185, 3248–3262.e20 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  16. Humphrey, S. et al. Bacterial chromosomal mobility via lateral transduction exceeds that of classical mobile genetic elements. Nat. Commun. 12, 6509 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  17. Fitzgerald, J. R. & Holden, M. T. G. Genomics of natural populations of Staphylococcus aureus. Annu. Rev. Microbiol. 70, 459–478 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  18. Waldron, D. E. & Lindsay, J. A. Sau1: a novel lineage-specific type I restriction-modification system that blocks horizontal gene transfer into Staphylococcus aureus and between S. aureus isolates of different lineages. J. Bacteriol. 188, 5578–5585 (2006).

    Google Scholar 

  19. Christie, G. E. et al. The complete genomes of Staphylococcus aureus bacteriophages 80 and 80α-implications for the specificity of SaPI mobilization. Virology 407, 381–390 (2010).

    Google Scholar 

  20. Fitzgerald, J. R. et al. Characterization of a putative pathogenicity island from bovine Staphylococcus aureus encoding multiple superantigens. J. Bacteriol. 183, 63–70 (2001).

    Google Scholar 

  21. Laddaga, R. A., Chu, L., Misra, T. K. & Silver, S. Nucleotide sequence and expression of the mercurial-resistance operon from Staphylococcus aureus plasmid pI258. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 84, 5106–5110 (1987).

    Google Scholar 

  22. Caryl, J. A. & O’Neill, A. J. Complete nucleotide sequence of pGO1, the prototype conjugative plasmid from the staphylococci. Plasmid 62, 35–38 (2009).

    Google Scholar 

  23. Chen, J. et al. Genome hypermobility by lateral transduction. Science 362, 207–212 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  24. Fillol-Salom, A. et al. Phage-inducible chromosomal islands are ubiquitous within the bacterial universe. ISME J. 12, 2114–2128 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  25. Martínez-Rubio, R. et al. Phage-inducible islands in the Gram-positive cocci. ISME J. 11, 1029–1042 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  26. Ubeda, C. et al. SaPI operon I is required for SaPI packaging and is controlled by LexA. Mol. Microbiol. 65, 41–50 (2007).

    Google Scholar 

  27. Tormo, M. A. et al. Staphylococcus aureus pathogenicity island DNA is packaged in particles composed of phage proteins. J. Bacteriol. 190, 2434–2440 (2008).

    Google Scholar 

  28. Iandolo, J. J. et al. Comparative analysis of the genomes of the temperate bacteriophages phi 11, phi 12 and phi 13 of Staphylococcus aureus 8325. Gene 289, 109–118 (2002).

    Google Scholar 

  29. Narita, S. et al. Phage conversion of Panton-Valentine leukocidin in Staphylococcus aureus: molecular analysis of a PVL-converting phage, phiSLT. Gene 268, 195–206 (2001).

    Google Scholar 

  30. Viana, D. et al. Adaptation of Staphylococcus aureus to ruminant and equine hosts involves SaPI-carried variants of von Willebrand factor-binding protein. Mol. Microbiol. 77, 1583–1594 (2010).

    Google Scholar 

  31. Ibarra-Chávez, R., Brady, A., Chen, J., Penadés, J. R. & Haag, A. F. Phage-inducible chromosomal islands promote genetic variability by blocking phage reproduction and protecting transductants from phage lysis. PLoS Genet. 18, e1010146 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  32. Chee, M. S. J. et al. Dual pathogenicity island transfer by piggybacking lateral transduction. Cell 186, 3414–3426 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  33. Projan, S. J. et al. Comparative sequence and functional analysis of pT181 and pC221, cognate plasmid replicons from Staphylococcus aureus. Mol. Genom. Genet. 199, 452–464 (1985).

    Google Scholar 

  34. Gómez-Sanz, E., Zarazaga, M., Kadlec, K., Schwarz, S. & Torres, C. Chromosomal integration of the novel plasmid pUR3912 from methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus ST398 of human origin. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. 19, E519–E522 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  35. Yui Eto, K. et al. Evolution of a 72-kilobase cointegrant, conjugative multiresistance plasmid in community-associated methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus isolates from the early 1990s. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 63, 10–1128 (2019).

  36. Moller, A. G., Lindsay, J. A. & Read, T. D. Determinants of phage host range in species. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 85, e00209–e00219 (2019).

  37. Roberts, G. A. et al. Impact of target site distribution for type I restriction enzymes on the evolution of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) populations. Nucleic Acids Res. 41, 7472–7484 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  38. Park, S. et al. A longitudinal census of the bacterial community in raw milk correlated with Staphylococcus aureus clinical mastitis infections in dairy cattle. Anim. Microbiome 4, 59 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  39. Feil, E. J. et al. How clonal is Staphylococcus aureus? J. Bacteriol. 185, 3307–3316 (2003).

    Google Scholar 

  40. Cooper, L. P. et al. DNA target recognition domains in the type I restriction and modification systems of Staphylococcus aureus. Nucleic Acids Res. 45, 3395–3406 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  41. Oliveira, P. H., Touchon, M. & Rocha, E. P. C. The interplay of restriction-modification systems with mobile genetic elements and their prokaryotic hosts. Nucleic Acids Res. 42, 10618–10631 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  42. Oliveira, P. H., Touchon, M. & Rocha, E. P. C. Regulation of genetic flux between bacteria by restriction-modification systems. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 113, 5658–5663 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  43. Roberts, R. J., Vincze, T., Posfai, J. & Macelis, D. REBASE: a database for DNA restriction and modification: enzymes, genes and genomes. Nucleic Acids Res. 51, D629–D630 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  44. McCarthy, A. J. & Lindsay, J. A. The distribution of plasmids that carry virulence and resistance genes in Staphylococcus aureus is lineage associated. BMC Microbiol. 12, 104 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  45. McCarthy, A. J. & Lindsay, J. A. Genetic variation in Staphylococcus aureus surface and immune evasion genes is lineage associated: implications for vaccine design and host-pathogen interactions. BMC Microbiol. 10, 173 (2010).

    Google Scholar 

  46. Dimitriu, T., Szczelkun, M. D. & Westra, E. R. Various plasmid strategies limit the effect of bacterial restriction-modification systems against conjugation. Nucleic Acids Res. 52, 12976–12986 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  47. Campbell, A. Episomes. In: King, R.C. (eds) Bacteria, Bacteriophages, and Fungi. Springer, Boston, MA. (1974).

  48. Manning, K. A. & Dokland, T. The gp44 ejection protein of bacteriophage 80α binds to the ends of the genome and protects it from degradation. Viruses 12, 563 (2020).

  49. Sheng, Y. et al. Insertion sequence transposition inactivates CRISPR-Cas immunity. Nat. Commun. 14, 4366 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  50. Dionisio, F., Matic, I., Radman, M., Rodrigues, O. R. & Taddei, F. Plasmids spread very fast in heterogeneous bacterial communities. Genetics 162, 1525–1532 (2002).

    Google Scholar 

  51. Jiang, W. et al. Dealing with the evolutionary downside of CRISPR immunity: bacteria and beneficial plasmids. PLoS Genet. 9, e1003844 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  52. Gandon, S. & Vale, P. F. The evolution of resistance against good and bad infections. J. Evol. Biol. 27, 303–312 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  53. Dimitriu, T., Szczelkun, M. D. & Westra, E. R. Evolutionary ecology and interplay of prokaryotic innate and adaptive immune systems. Curr. Biol. 30, R1189–R1202 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  54. Ramiro-Martínez, P., de Quinto, I., Gama, J. A. & Rodríguez-Beltrán, J. Universal rules govern plasmid copy number. Nat. Commun. 16, 6022 (2025).

  55. Loenen, W. A. M., Dryden, D. T. F., Raleigh, E. A., Wilson, G. G. & Murray, N. E. Highlights of the DNA cutters: a short history of the restriction enzymes. Nucleic Acids Res. 42, 3–19 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  56. Casadesús, J. & Low, D. Epigenetic gene regulation in the bacterial world. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 70, 830–856 (2006).

    Google Scholar 

  57. Sánchez-Romero, M. A., Cota, I. & Casadesús, J. DNA methylation in bacteria: from the methyl group to the methylome. Curr. Opin. Microbiol. 25, 9–16 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  58. Mohammadi-Kambs, M., Hölz, K., Somoza, M. M. & Ott, A. Hamming distance as a concept in DNA molecular recognition. ACS Omega 2, 1302–1308 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  59. Wang, C., Kao, W.-H. & Hsiao, C. K. Using hamming distance as information for SNP-sets clustering and testing in disease association studies. PLoS ONE 10, e0135918 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  60. Blair, J. E. & Carr, M. The bacteriophage typing of staphylococci. J. Infect. Dis. 93, 1–13 (1953).

    Google Scholar 

  61. Gorzynski, J. et al. Bacterial defence systems drive the evolution of intra-species lineages. Cell Rep. 45, 116957 (2026).

  62. Payne, L. J. et al. PADLOC: a web server for the identification of antiviral defence systems in microbial genomes. Nucleic Acids Res. 50, W541–W550 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  63. Tesson, F. et al. Systematic and quantitative view of the antiviral arsenal of prokaryotes. Nat. Commun. 13, 2561 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  64. Hunt, M. et al. Circlator: automated circularization of genome assemblies using long sequencing reads. Genome Biol. 16, 294 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  65. Bushnell, B., Rood, J. & Singer, E. BBMerge-accurate paired shotgun read merging via overlap. PLoS ONE 12, e0185056 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  66. Seemann, T. Prokka: rapid prokaryotic genome annotation. Bioinformatics 30, 2068–2069 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  67. Tonkin-Hill, G. et al. Producing polished prokaryotic pangenomes with the panaroo pipeline. Genome Biol. 21, 180 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  68. Katz, L. S. et al. Mashtree: a rapid comparison of whole genome sequence files. J. Open Source Softw. 4, 10–21105 (2019).

  69. Arnaud, M., Chastanet, A. & Débarbouillé, M. New vector for efficient allelic replacement in naturally nontransformable, low-GC-content, gram-positive bacteria. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 70, 6887–6891 (2004).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank Prof Luca G. Guardabassi for gifting us the strains used in this study as recipients. We would like to thank Lorrie Maccario for her assistance with library preparation and hybrid assemblies. This work was supported by grants MR/X020223/1, MR/M003876/1, MR/V000772/1 and MR/S00940X/1 from the Medical Research Council (UK), BB/V002376/1 and BB/V009583/1 from the Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council (BBSRC, UK), EP/X026671/1 from the Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EPSRC, UK), and ERC-2023-SyG Project 101118890—TalkingPhages to J.R.P., a research grant (VIL58733-Weaponizable satellites) from VILLUM FONDEN to R.I.-C, and grant BB/W014920/1 from the Biological Sciences Research Council, and the Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council institute strategic grant BBS/E/D/20002173 to J.R.F.

Author information

Author notes
  1. These authors contributed equally: Wendy Figueroa, Akshay Sabnis.

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Infectious Disease, Imperial College London, London, UK

    Wendy Figueroa, Akshay Sabnis & José R. Penadés

  2. Centre for Bacterial Resistance Biology, Imperial College London, London, UK

    Wendy Figueroa, Akshay Sabnis & José R. Penadés

  3. Section of Microbiology, Department of Biology, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark

    Rodrigo Ibarra-Chávez

  4. Center for Evolutionary Hologenomics, Globe Institute, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark

    Rodrigo Ibarra-Chávez

  5. The Roslin Institute, Royal (Dick) School of Veterinary Studies, The University of Edinburgh, Easter Bush Campus, Edinburgh, UK

    Jamie Gorzynski & J. Ross Fitzgerald

  6. Veterinary School, Universidad CEU Cardenal Herrera, Alfara del Patriarca, Spain

    José R. Penadés

Authors
  1. Wendy Figueroa
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Akshay Sabnis
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Rodrigo Ibarra-Chávez
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Jamie Gorzynski
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  5. J. Ross Fitzgerald
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  6. José R. Penadés
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

J.R.P. conceived the study; W.F., A.S. and R.I.C. conducted the experiments; W.F., J.G. performed the bioinformatics analyses; W.F., A.S., J.G., J.R.F. and J.R.P. analysed the data; W.F. made all figures, J.R.P. wrote the manuscript with inputs from all the authors.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to José R. Penadés.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Peer review

Peer review information

Nature Communications thanks the anonymous reviewers for their contribution to the peer review of this work. A peer review file is available.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Information (download PDF )

Reporting Summary (download PDF )

Transparent Peer Review File (download PDF )

Source data

Source Data (download XLSX )

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Figueroa, W., Sabnis, A., Ibarra-Chávez, R. et al. Immune-deficient bacteria serve as gateways to genetic exchange and microbial evolution. Nat Commun (2026). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-026-71467-z

Download citation

  • Received: 22 April 2025

  • Accepted: 16 March 2026

  • Published: 01 April 2026

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-026-71467-z

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

Download PDF

Advertisement

Explore content

  • Research articles
  • Reviews & Analysis
  • News & Comment
  • Videos
  • Collections
  • Subjects
  • Follow us on Facebook
  • Follow us on X
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed

About the journal

  • Aims & Scope
  • Editors
  • Journal Information
  • Open Access Fees and Funding
  • Calls for Papers
  • Editorial Values Statement
  • Journal Metrics
  • Editors' Highlights
  • Contact
  • Editorial policies
  • Top Articles

Publish with us

  • For authors
  • For Reviewers
  • Language editing services
  • Open access funding
  • Submit manuscript

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

  • Explore articles by subject
  • Find a job
  • Guide to authors
  • Editorial policies

Nature Communications (Nat Commun)

ISSN 2041-1723 (online)

nature.com footer links

About Nature Portfolio

  • About us
  • Press releases
  • Press office
  • Contact us

Discover content

  • Journals A-Z
  • Articles by subject
  • protocols.io
  • Nature Index

Publishing policies

  • Nature portfolio policies
  • Open access

Author & Researcher services

  • Reprints & permissions
  • Research data
  • Language editing
  • Scientific editing
  • Nature Masterclasses
  • Research Solutions

Libraries & institutions

  • Librarian service & tools
  • Librarian portal
  • Open research
  • Recommend to library

Advertising & partnerships

  • Advertising
  • Partnerships & Services
  • Media kits
  • Branded content

Professional development

  • Nature Awards
  • Nature Careers
  • Nature Conferences

Regional websites

  • Nature Africa
  • Nature China
  • Nature India
  • Nature Japan
  • Nature Middle East
  • Privacy Policy
  • Use of cookies
  • Legal notice
  • Accessibility statement
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Your US state privacy rights
Springer Nature

© 2026 Springer Nature Limited

Nature Briefing Microbiology

Sign up for the Nature Briefing: Microbiology newsletter — what matters in microbiology research, free to your inbox weekly.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing: Microbiology