Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Advertisement

Nature Communications
  • View all journals
  • Search
  • My Account Login
  • Content Explore content
  • About the journal
  • Publish with us
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed
  1. nature
  2. nature communications
  3. articles
  4. article
Skeletal editing via multi-step engineering of a modular polyketide synthase
Download PDF
Download PDF
  • Article
  • Open access
  • Published: 08 April 2026

Skeletal editing via multi-step engineering of a modular polyketide synthase

  • Kei Kudo  ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0001-7500-94621 na1,
  • Takuya Hashimoto  ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0002-6261-453X1 na1,
  • Takayoshi Awakawa  ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0003-2575-31752,3 na1,
  • Lihan Zhang  ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0003-4364-62424,5,6 na1,
  • Takehiro Nishimura  ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0002-6600-91937 nAff10,
  • Junko Hashimoto  ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0002-3831-18468,
  • Ikuko Kozone8,
  • Noritaka Kagaya7,
  • Hikaru Suenaga  ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0003-2218-92731,
  • Adrian T. Keatinge-Clay  ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0002-4358-76289,
  • Ikuro Abe  ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0002-3640-888X2 &
  • …
  • Kazuo Shin-ya  ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0002-4702-06611 

Nature Communications , Article number:  (2026) Cite this article

  • 3203 Accesses

  • 6 Altmetric

  • Metrics details

We are providing an unedited version of this manuscript to give early access to its findings. Before final publication, the manuscript will undergo further editing. Please note there may be errors present which affect the content, and all legal disclaimers apply.

Subjects

  • Biosynthesis
  • Drug discovery and development
  • Genetic engineering
  • Natural product synthesis
  • Protein design

Abstract

Assembly line biosynthesis creates numerous structurally diverse natural products using a common modular synthetic strategy. The collinearity between the architectures of modular polyketide synthases (PKS) and the structures of their polyketide products would seem to render these biosynthetic machineries excellent platforms for designer biosynthesis, yet reliable strategies to reprogram these assembly lines without diminishing their activities have not been identified. Here, as a best practice for PKS engineering, we demonstrate the reprogramming of the mediomycin PKS without significant loss of productivity. Using in vitro CRISPR/Cas9 gene editing followed by heterologous expression, we reconstruct an inaccessible drug lead of the fibrinogen receptor, tetrafibricin, at 82 ± 3 mg/L yield, retaining 26% productivity after five-step module editing using an evolution-supported cut site, downstream of the acyltransferase domain. A macrocyclic aminopolyol is also accessed through thioesterase swapping. These results pave the way toward the rational reprogramming of PKSs to access desired complex organic molecules.

Similar content being viewed by others

Enzymology of assembly line synthesis by modular polyketide synthases

Article 13 March 2023

Plug-and-play engineering of modular polyketide synthases

Article 18 April 2025

Structural basis for intermodular communication in assembly-line polyketide biosynthesis

Article 23 August 2024

Data availability

All data supporting the findings of the study are available from the corresponding author upon request. Source data are provided with this paper.

References

  1. Fischbach, M. A. & Walsh, C. T. Assembly-line enzymology for polyketide and nonribosomal peptide antibiotics: logic, machinery, and mechanisms. Chem. Rev. 106, 3468–3496 (2006).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Staunton, J. & Weissman, K. J. Polyketide biosynthesis: a millennium review. Nat. Prod. Rep. 18, 380–416 (2001).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Herbst, D. A., Townsend, C. A. & Maier, T. The architectures of iterative type I PKs and FAS. Nat. Prod. Rep. 35, 1046–1069 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Paiva, P. et al. Animal fatty acid synthase: a chemical nanofactory. Chem. Rev. 121, 9502–9553 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Khosla, C. Harnessing the biosynthetic potential of modular polyketide synthases. Chem. Rev. 97, 2577–2590 (1997).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Keatinge-Clay, A. T. The structures of type I polyketide synthases. Nat. Prod. Rep. 29, 1050–1073 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Katsuyama, Y. & Miyanaga, A. Recent advances in the structural biology of modular polyketide synthases and nonribosomal peptide synthetases. Curr. Opin. Chem. Biol. 71, 102223 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Grininger, M. Enzymology of assembly line synthesis by modular polyketide synthases. Nat. Chem. Biol. 19, 401–415 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Ranganathan, A. et al. Knowledge-based design of bimodular and trimodular polyketide synthases based on domain and module swaps: a route to simple statin analogues. Chem. Biol. 6, 731–741 (1999).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Menzella, H. G. et al. Combinatorial polyketide biosynthesis by de novo design and rearrangement of modular polyketide synthase genes. Nat. Biotechnol. 23, 1171–1176 (2005).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Walker, M. C. et al. Expanding the fluorine chemistry of living systems using engineered polyketide synthase pathways. Science 341, 1089–1094 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  12. Peng, H., Ishida, K., Sugimoto, Y., Jenke-Kodama, H. & Hertweck, C. Emulating evolutionary processes to morph aureothin-type modular polyketide synthases and associated oxygenases. Nat. Commun. 10, 3918 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  13. Kudo, K. et al. In vitro cas9-assisted editing of modular polyketide synthase genes to produce desired natural product derivatives. Nat. Commun. 11, 4022 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  14. Su, L. et al. Engineering the stambomycin modular polyketide synthase yields 37-membered mini-stambomycins. Nat. Commun. 13, 515 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  15. Cane, D. E., Walsh, C. T. & Khosla, C. Harnessing the biosynthetic code: combinations, permutations, and mutations. Science 282, 63–68 (1998).

    Google Scholar 

  16. Weissman, K. J. Genetic engineering of modular PKSs: from combinatorial biosynthesis to synthetic biology. Nat. Prod. Rep. 33, 203–230 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  17. Klaus, M. & Grininger, M. Engineering strategies for rational polyketide synthase design. Nat. Prod. Rep. 35, 1070–1081 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  18. Donadio, S., Staver, M. J., McAlpine, J. B., Swanson, S. J. & Katz, L. Modular organization of genes required for complex polyketide biosynthesis. Science 252, 675–679 (1991).

    Google Scholar 

  19. Zhang, L. et al. Characterization of giant modular PKSs provides insight into genetic mechanism for structural diversification of aminopolyol polyketides. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 56, 1740–1745 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  20. Grote, M. et al. Identification of crucial bottlenecks in engineered polyketide biosynthesis. Org. Biomol. Chem. 17, 6374–6385 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  21. Hirsch, M., Fitzgerald, B. J. & Keatinge-Clay, A. T. How cis-acyltransferase assembly-line ketosynthases gatekeep for processed polyketide intermediates. ACS Chem. Biol. 16, 2515–2526 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  22. Ray, K. A., Saif, N. & Keatinge-Clay, A. T. Modular polyketide synthase ketosynthases collaborate with upstream dehydratases to install double bonds. Chem. Commun. 60, 8712–8715 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  23. Klaus, M. et al. Protein-protein interactions, not substrate recognition, dominate the turnover of chimeric assembly line polyketide synthases. J. Biol. Chem. 291, 16404–16415 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  24. Klaus, M., Buyachuihan, L. & Grininger, M. Ketosynthase domain constrains the design of polyketide synthases. ACS Chem. Biol. 15, 2422–2432 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  25. Mabesoone, M. F. J. et al. Evolution-guided engineering of trans-acyltransferase polyketide synthases. Science 383, 1312–1317 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  26. Yi, D., Wakeel, M. A. & Agarwal, V. Gatekeeping activity of collinear ketosynthase domains limits product diversity for engineered type I polyketide synthases. Biochemistry 63, 2240–2244 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  27. Yuzawa, S. et al. Comprehensive in vitro analysis of acyltransferase domain exchanges in modular polyketide synthases and its application for short-chain ketone production. ACS Synth. Biol. 6, 139–147 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  28. Medema, M. H., Cimermancic, P., Sali, A., Takano, E. & Fischbach, M. A. A systematic computational analysis of biosynthetic gene cluster evolution: Lessons for engineering biosynthesis. PLoS Comput. Biol. 10, e1004016 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  29. Bozhuyuk, K. A. J. et al. De novo design and engineering of non-ribosomal peptide synthetases. Nat. Chem. 10, 275–281 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  30. Tang, Y., Kim, C. Y., Mathews, I. I., Cane, D. E. & Khosla, C. The 2.7-angstrom crystal structure of a 194-kDa homodimeric fragment of the 6-deoxyerythronolide B synthase. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 103, 11124–11129 (2006).

    Google Scholar 

  31. Cogan, D. P. et al. Mapping the catalytic conformations of an assembly-line polyketide synthase module. Science 374, 729–734 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  32. Bagde, S. R., Mathews, I. I., Fromme, J. C. & Kim, C. Y. Modular polyketide synthase contains two reaction chambers that operate asynchronously. Science 374, 723–729 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  33. Kamiyama, T. et al. Tetrafibricin, a novel fibrinogen receptor antagonist. Ii. Structural elucidation. J. Antibiot. 46, 1047–1054 (1993).

    Google Scholar 

  34. Kamiyama, T. et al. Tetrafibricin, a novel fibrinogen receptor antagonist. I. Taxonomy, fermentation, isolation, characterization and biological activities. J. Antibiot. 46, 1039–1046 (1993).

    Google Scholar 

  35. Friedrich, R. M. & Friestad, G. K. Inspirations from tetrafibricin and related polyketides: New methods and strategies for 1,5-polyol synthesis. Nat. Prod. Rep. 37, 1229–1261 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  36. Sun, F., Xu, S., Jiang, F. & Liu, W. Genomic-driven discovery of an amidinohydrolase involved in the biosynthesis of mediomycin A. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 102, 2225–2234 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  37. Ridley, C. P., Lee, H. Y. & Khosla, C. Evolution of polyketide synthases in bacteria. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 105, 4595–4600 (2008).

    Google Scholar 

  38. Gokhale, R. S., Hunziker, D., Cane, D. E. & Khosla, C. Mechanism and specificity of the terminal thioesterase domain from the erythromycin polyketide synthase. Chem. Biol. 6, 117–125 (1999).

    Google Scholar 

  39. Miyazawa, T., Hirsch, M., Zhang, Z. & Keatinge-Clay, A. T. An in vitro platform for engineering and harnessing modular polyketide synthases. Nat. Commun. 11, 80 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  40. Ray, K. A. et al. Assessing and harnessing updated polyketide synthase modules through combinatorial engineering. Nat. Commun. 15, 6485 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  41. Yuzawa, S. et al. Short-chain ketone production by engineered polyketide synthases in streptomyces albus. Nat. Commun. 9, 4569 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  42. Zhang, J., Bista, R., Miyazawa, T. & Keatinge-Clay, A. T. Boosting titers of engineered triketide and tetraketide synthases to record levels through t7 promoter tuning. Metab. Eng. 78, 93–98 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  43. Miyazawa, T., Fitzgerald, B. J. & Keatinge-Clay, A. T. Preparative production of an enantiomeric pair by engineered polyketide synthases. Chem. Commun. (Camb.) 57, 8762–8765 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  44. Hagen, A. et al. Engineering a polyketide synthase for in vitro production of adipic acid. ACS Synth. Biol. 5, 21–27 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  45. Huang, Z. et al. Plug-and-play engineering of modular polyketide synthases. Nat. Chem. Biol. 21, 1361–1367 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  46. Englund, E. et al. Nature communicationsbiosensor guided polyketide synthases engineering for optimization of domain exchange boundaries. Nat. Commun. 14, 4871 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  47. Itoh, H. & Inoue, M. Comprehensive structure-activity relationship studies of macrocyclic natural products enabled by their total syntheses. Chem. Rev. 119, 10002–10031 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  48. Buyachuihan, L., Stegemann, F. & Grininger, M. How acyl carrier proteins (acps) direct fatty acid and polyketide biosynthesis. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 63, e202312476 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  49. Tran, L., Broadhurst, R. W., Tosin, M., Cavalli, A. & Weissman, K. J. Insights into protein-protein and enzyme-substrate interactions in modular polyketide synthases. Chem. Biol. 17, 705–716 (2010).

    Google Scholar 

  50. Cortes, J. et al. Repositioning of a domain in a modular polyketide synthase to promote specific chain cleavage. Science 268, 1487–1489 (1995).

    Google Scholar 

  51. Kao, C. M., Luo, G. L., Katz, L., Cane, D. E. & Khosla, C. Manipulation of macrolide ring size by directed mutagenesis of a modular polyketide synthase. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 117, 9105–9106 (1995).

    Google Scholar 

  52. Menzella, H. G., Carney, J. R. & Santi, D. V. Rational design and assembly of synthetic trimodular polyketide synthases. Chem. Biol. 14, 143–151 (2007).

    Google Scholar 

  53. Hansen, D. A., Koch, A. A. & Sherman, D. H. Identification of a thioesterase bottleneck in the pikromycin pathway through full-module processing of unnatural pentaketides. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 139, 13450–13455 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  54. Kudo, K. et al. Capability of a large bacterial artificial chromosome clone harboring multiple biosynthetic gene clusters for the production of diverse compounds. J. Antibiot. 77, 288–298 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  55. Kudo, K., Nishimura, T., Miyako, K., Suenaga, H. & Shin-Ya, K. A new cannabigerolic acid derivative and its unprenylated precursor produced through the reconstitution of cannabinoid biosynthesis in streptomyces. J. Antibiot. 78, 126–130 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  56. Katoh, K. & Standley, D. M. Mafft multiple sequence alignment software version 7: Improvements in performance and usability. Mol. Biol. Evol. 30, 772–780 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  57. Price, M. N., Dehal, P. S. & Arkin, A. P. Fasttree 2–approximately maximum-likelihood trees for large alignments. PLoS ONE 5, e9490 (2010).

    Google Scholar 

  58. Sievers, F. et al. Fast, scalable generation of high-quality protein multiple sequence alignments using clustal omega. Mol. Syst. Biol. 7, 539 (2011).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by Japan Agency for Medical Research and Development (AMED) grant JP19ae0101045 (KS), Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (JSPS) KAKENHI grant JP23H05474 (KS), JSPS KAKENHI grant JP23H04569 (KK), and NIH grant GM145992 (ATK). We also thanks Drs. Toshio Nagashima, Huiping Zhang, and Yoshitaka Ishii (Riken) for measurement of NMR spectra at RIKEN Yokohama.

Author information

Author notes
  1. Takehiro Nishimura

    Present address: Faculty of Pharmacy, Keio University, Tokyo, Japan

  2. These authors contributed equally: Kei Kudo, Takuya Hashimoto, Takayoshi Awakawa, Lihan Zhang.

Authors and Affiliations

  1. National Institute of Advanced Industrial Science and Technology (AIST), Tokyo, Japan

    Kei Kudo, Takuya Hashimoto, Hikaru Suenaga & Kazuo Shin-ya

  2. Graduate School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan

    Takayoshi Awakawa & Ikuro Abe

  3. RIKEN, Center for Sustainable Resource Sciences, Saitama, Japan

    Takayoshi Awakawa

  4. Department of Chemistry, School of Science and Research Center for Industries of the Future, Zhejiang Key Laboratory of Precise Synthesis of Functional Molecules, Westlake University, Hangzhou, China

    Lihan Zhang

  5. Institute of Natural Sciences, Westlake Institute for Advanced Study, Hangzhou, China

    Lihan Zhang

  6. Westlake Laboratory of Life Sciences and Biomedicine, Hangzhou, China

    Lihan Zhang

  7. Technology Research Association for Next Generation Natural Products Chemistry, Tokyo, Japan

    Takehiro Nishimura & Noritaka Kagaya

  8. Japan Biological Informatics Consortium (JBIC), Tokyo, Japan

    Junko Hashimoto & Ikuko Kozone

  9. Department of Molecular Biosciences, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, USA

    Adrian T. Keatinge-Clay

Authors
  1. Kei Kudo
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Takuya Hashimoto
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Takayoshi Awakawa
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Lihan Zhang
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Takehiro Nishimura
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Junko Hashimoto
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Ikuko Kozone
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Noritaka Kagaya
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Hikaru Suenaga
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  10. Adrian T. Keatinge-Clay
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  11. Ikuro Abe
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  12. Kazuo Shin-ya
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

All authors contributed to the writing of the paper. Conceptualization: K.K., T.H., T.A., L.Z., A.T.K., I.A., K.S. Methodology: K.K., T.H., L.Z., K.S. Investigation: K.K., T.H., T.A., T.N., J.H., I.K, N.K. Visualization: K.K., T.A., L.Z., T.N., N.K. Funding acquisition: K.K., K.S. Project administration: K.S. Supervision: H.S., I.A., K.S. Writing – original draft: K.K., L.Z. Writing – review & editing: K.K., T.A., L.Z., A.T.K., K.S.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kazuo Shin-ya.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Peer review

Peer review information

Nature Communications thanks Kira Weissman, Martin Grininger and the other anonymous reviewer for their contribution to the peer review of this work. [A peer review file is available].

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

SupplementaryInformation (download PDF )

Description of Additional Supplementary Files (download PDF )

Supplementary Data 1 (download XLSX )

Supplementary Data 2 (download PDF )

Reporting Summary (download PDF )

Transparent Peer Review file (download PDF )

Source data

Source Data (download XLSX )

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if you modified the licensed material. You do not have permission under this licence to share adapted material derived from this article or parts of it. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kudo, K., Hashimoto, T., Awakawa, T. et al. Skeletal editing via multi-step engineering of a modular polyketide synthase. Nat Commun (2026). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-026-71501-0

Download citation

  • Received: 28 November 2025

  • Accepted: 23 March 2026

  • Published: 08 April 2026

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-026-71501-0

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

Download PDF

Advertisement

Explore content

  • Research articles
  • Reviews & Analysis
  • News & Comment
  • Videos
  • Collections
  • Subjects
  • Follow us on Facebook
  • Follow us on X
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed

About the journal

  • Aims & Scope
  • Editors
  • Journal Information
  • Open Access Fees and Funding
  • Calls for Papers
  • Editorial Values Statement
  • Journal Metrics
  • Editors' Highlights
  • Contact
  • Editorial policies
  • Top Articles

Publish with us

  • For authors
  • For Reviewers
  • Language editing services
  • Open access funding
  • Submit manuscript

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

  • Explore articles by subject
  • Find a job
  • Guide to authors
  • Editorial policies

Nature Communications (Nat Commun)

ISSN 2041-1723 (online)

nature.com footer links

About Nature Portfolio

  • About us
  • Press releases
  • Press office
  • Contact us

Discover content

  • Journals A-Z
  • Articles by subject
  • protocols.io
  • Nature Index

Publishing policies

  • Nature portfolio policies
  • Open access

Author & Researcher services

  • Reprints & permissions
  • Research data
  • Language editing
  • Scientific editing
  • Nature Masterclasses
  • Research Solutions

Libraries & institutions

  • Librarian service & tools
  • Librarian portal
  • Open research
  • Recommend to library

Advertising & partnerships

  • Advertising
  • Partnerships & Services
  • Media kits
  • Branded content

Professional development

  • Nature Awards
  • Nature Careers
  • Nature Conferences

Regional websites

  • Nature Africa
  • Nature China
  • Nature India
  • Nature Japan
  • Nature Middle East
  • Privacy Policy
  • Use of cookies
  • Legal notice
  • Accessibility statement
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Your US state privacy rights
Springer Nature

© 2026 Springer Nature Limited

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing