Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Advertisement

Nature Communications
  • View all journals
  • Search
  • My Account Login
  • Content Explore content
  • About the journal
  • Publish with us
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed
  1. nature
  2. nature communications
  3. articles
  4. article
Characterizing gene perturbations in single cells via network divergence analysis
Download PDF
Download PDF
  • Article
  • Open access
  • Published: 11 April 2026

Characterizing gene perturbations in single cells via network divergence analysis

  • Chao Huang  ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0003-1186-09731,2 na1,
  • Yuhan Li1,2 na1,
  • Botao Fa  ORCID: orcid.org/0009-0009-0973-93661,2 na1,
  • Jinglin Zhu3,
  • Zhenni Liu1,2,
  • Yixin Ma  ORCID: orcid.org/0009-0006-9262-88321,2,
  • Zhitao Zhang  ORCID: orcid.org/0009-0009-2012-32631,2,
  • Yungang Xu  ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0002-9834-30064,
  • Qiuran Xu  ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0003-2171-92795 &
  • …
  • Zhengtao Xiao  ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0002-5535-53811,2,6 na2 

Nature Communications (2026) Cite this article

  • 3542 Accesses

  • 1 Altmetric

  • Metrics details

We are providing an unedited version of this manuscript to give early access to its findings. Before final publication, the manuscript will undergo further editing. Please note there may be errors present which affect the content, and all legal disclaimers apply.

Subjects

  • Biochemical networks
  • Gene regulatory networks
  • Systems analysis
  • Systems biology

Abstract

Functional perturbations of genes do not always cause expression changes, but can manifest through network rewiring or context-specific shifts in regulatory activity. However, inferring functional shifts in genes and linking them to the specific cell populations remains challenging, as most current scRNA-seq data analysis focuses either on differential gene expression or on cell abundance/state changes, but rarely associate gene perturbations with particular cell populations. Here we present scDNS, a framework that quantifies gene-specific functional perturbations by measuring information-theoretic divergence between condition-specific gene interaction network configurations. In simulated stress tests and multiple experimental datasets, scDNS prioritizes key regulators and perturbed cell populations, even when expression changes are minimal but network rewiring is pronounced. Applications to immunodeficiency mutations, stimulus responses, and viral infection reveal hidden regulatory programs and heterogeneous responder cell states. In pancreatic cancer, scDNS nominates TIMM44 as a mitochondrial sensitizer enhancing gemcitabine efficacy. Together, scDNS provides a powerful tool for inferring dynamic gene perturbations in single cells.

Similar content being viewed by others

A cell type and state specific gene regulation network inference method for immune regulatory analysis

Article Open access 13 August 2025

Robust identification of perturbed cell types in single-cell RNA-seq data

Article Open access 01 September 2024

Profiling cell identity and tissue architecture with single-cell and spatial transcriptomics

Article 21 August 2024

Data availability

scRNA-seq data from cells carrying triple mutations (TERTC228T, TP53G743A, and PDGFRAD842V)31 were obtained from the NCBI Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) under accession ID GSE229901. scRNA-seq data of DSP-knockout cells29 were obtained from GEO under accession GSE189068. scRNA-seq data of IRF4p.T95R B cells and PBMCs3 were retrieved from GEO under accessions GSE215936 and GSE215938, respectively. PBMC scRNA-seq following IFN-β treatment38 were accessed from NCBI GEO database accession GSE96583. COVID-19 single-nucleus RNA-seq (snRNA-seq) datasets42 were accessed from GEO under accession GSE171524, and PBMC bulk RNA-seq datasets47 were accessed under GSE217948. COVID-19 spatial transcriptomics data45 were obtained from the crost database66 (accession ID VISDS000628). scRNA-seq data of PANC-1 cell lines treated with gemcitabine30 were obtained from GEO under accession GSE186960. Bulk RNA-seq data of PANC-1 cells treated with gemcitabine, MitoBlock-10, or their combination, as well as the phosphoproteomics data of gemcitabine-treated PANC-1 cells, have been deposited in the Genome Sequence Archive under project PRJCA055925. An example dataset has been deposited in Zenodo and is available at https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1876766367. Source data are provided with this paper.

Code availability

scDNS is implemented as an R package and is available on GitHub (https://github.com/xiaolab-xjtu/scDNS), under the CC BY 4.0 license. The specific version of the code associated with this publication is archived in Zenodo and is accessible via https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1876095168.

References

  1. Barabási, A. L. & Oltvai, Z. N. Network biology: understanding the cell’s functional organization. Nat. Rev. Genet. 5, 101–113 (2004).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Kitano, H. Biological robustness. Nat. Rev. Genet. 5, 826–837 (2004).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Fornes, O. et al. A multimorphic mutation in IRF4 causes human autosomal dominant combined immunodeficiency. Sci. Immunol. 8, eade7953 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Urbach, L. et al. TP53 missense-specific transcriptional plasticity drives resistance against cell cycle inhibitors in pancreatic cancer. Sci. Adv. 11, eadu2339 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Yang, W. et al. ERK1/2-dependent phosphorylation and nuclear translocation of PKM2 promotes the Warburg effect. Nat. Cell Biol. 14, 1295–1304 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Badia-I-Mompel, P. et al. Gene regulatory network inference in the era of single-cell multi-omics. Nat. Rev. Genet. 24, 739–754 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Zhang, S. et al. Inference of cell type-specific gene regulatory networks on cell lineages from single cell omic datasets. Nat. Commun. 14, 3064 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Love, M. I., Huber, W. & Anders, S. Moderated estimation of fold change and dispersion for RNA-seq data with DESeq2. Genome Biol. 15, 550 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Pullin, J. M. & McCarthy, D. J. A comparison of marker gene selection methods for single-cell RNA sequencing data. Genome Biol. 25, 56 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Schefzik, R., Flesch, J. & Goncalves, A. Fast identification of differential distributions in single-cell RNA-sequencing data with waddR. Bioinformatics 37, 3204–3211 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Kim, M. C. et al. Method of moments framework for differential expression analysis of single-cell RNA sequencing data. Cell 187, 6393–6410.e6316 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  12. Obradovic, A. et al. Single-cell protein activity analysis identifies recurrence-associated renal tumor macrophages. Cell 184, 2988–3005.e2916 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  13. Aibar, S. et al. SCENIC: single-cell regulatory network inference and clustering. Nat. Methods 14, 1083–1086 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  14. Dann, E., Henderson, N. C., Teichmann, S. A., Morgan, M. D. & Marioni, J. C. Differential abundance testing on single-cell data using k-nearest neighbor graphs. Nat. Biotechnol. 40, 245–253 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  15. Nicol, P. B. et al. Robust identification of perturbed cell types in single-cell RNA-seq data. Nat. Commun. 15, 7610 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  16. Burkhardt, D. B. et al. Quantifying the effect of experimental perturbations at single-cell resolution. Nat. Biotechnol. 39, 619–629 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  17. Skinnider, M. A. et al. Cell type prioritization in single-cell data. Nat. Biotechnol. 39, 30–34 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  18. Veličković, P. et al. Graph attention networks. In International Conference on Learning Representations, (2018).

  19. Han, H. et al. TRRUST v2: an expanded reference database of human and mouse transcriptional regulatory interactions. Nucleic Acids Res. 46, D380–d386 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  20. Badia-I-Mompel, P. et al. decoupleR: ensemble of computational methods to infer biological activities from omics data. Bioinform. Adv. 2, vbac016 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  21. Orchard, S. et al. The MIntAct project-IntAct as a common curation platform for 11 molecular interaction databases. Nucleic Acids Res. 42, D358–D363 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  22. Szklarczyk, D. et al. The STRING database in 2023: protein-protein association networks and functional enrichment analyses for any sequenced genome of interest. Nucleic Acids Res. 51, D638–d646 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  23. Kanehisa, M., Furumichi, M., Sato, Y., Matsuura, Y. & Ishiguro-Watanabe, M. KEGG: biological systems database as a model of the real world. Nucleic Acids Res. 53, D672–d677 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  24. Paull, E. O. et al. Discovering causal pathways linking genomic events to transcriptional states using tied diffusion through interacting events (TieDIE). Bioinformatics 29, 2757–2764 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  25. Grover, A. & Leskovec, J. node2vec: scalable feature learning for networks. Kdd 2016, 855–864 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  26. Veličković, P. et al. Deep graph infomax. In International Conference on Learning Representations, (2019).

  27. Krishnaswamy, S. et al. Conditional density-based analysis of T cell signaling in single-cell data. Science 346, 1250689 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  28. van Dijk, D. et al. Recovering gene interactions from single-cell data using data diffusion. Cell 174, 716–729.e727 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  29. Werder, R. B. et al. CRISPR interference interrogation of COPD GWAS genes reveals the functional significance of desmoplakin in iPSC-derived alveolar epithelial cells. Sci. Adv. 8, eabo6566 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  30. Principe, D. R. et al. Calcium channel blockers potentiate gemcitabine chemotherapy in pancreatic cancer. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 119, e2200143119 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  31. DeSouza, P. A. et al. INSM1 governs a neuronal progenitor state that drives glioblastoma in a human stem cell model. Nat. Commun. 17, 31 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  32. Babushku, T. et al. Notch2 controls developmental fate choices between germinal center and marginal zone B cells upon immunization. Nat. Commun. 15, 1960 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  33. Ochiai, K. et al. Accelerated plasma-cell differentiation in Bach2-deficient mouse B cells is caused by altered IRF4 functions. EMBO J. 43, 1947–1964 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  34. Nera, K. P. et al. Loss of Pax5 promotes plasma cell differentiation. Immunity 24, 283–293 (2006).

    Google Scholar 

  35. Vogel, M. J. et al. FOXO1 repression contributes to block of plasma cell differentiation in classical Hodgkin lymphoma. Blood 124, 3118–3129 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  36. Hamosh, A., Scott, A. F., Amberger, J. S., Bocchini, C. A. & McKusick, V. A. Online Mendelian Inheritance in Man (OMIM), a knowledgebase of human genes and genetic disorders. Nucleic Acids Res. 33, D514–D517 (2005).

    Google Scholar 

  37. Lu, R., Medina, K. L., Lancki, D. W. & Singh, H. IRF-4,8 orchestrate the pre-B-to-B transition in lymphocyte development. Genes Dev. 17, 1703–1708 (2003).

    Google Scholar 

  38. Kang, H. M. et al. Multiplexed droplet single-cell RNA-sequencing using natural genetic variation. Nat. Biotechnol. 36, 89–94 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  39. Shemesh, M., Lochte, S., Piehler, J. & Schreiber, G. IFNAR1 and IFNAR2 play distinct roles in initiating type I interferon-induced JAK-STAT signaling and activating STATs. Sci. Signal 14, eabe4627 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  40. Cai, S. et al. Phase transition of WTAP regulates m6A modification of interferon-stimulated genes. Eilfe 13, (2025).

  41. Then Bergh, F., Dayyani, F. & Ziegler-Heitbrock, L. Impact of type-I-interferon on monocyte subsets and their differentiation to dendritic cells. An in vivo and ex vivo study in multiple sclerosis patients treated with interferon-beta. J. Neuroimmunol. 146, 176–188 (2004).

    Google Scholar 

  42. Melms, J. C. et al. A molecular single-cell lung atlas of lethal COVID-19. Nature 595, 114–119 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  43. Carcaterra, M. & Caruso, C. Alveolar epithelial cell type II as main target of SARS-CoV-2 virus and COVID-19 development via NF-Kb pathway deregulation: a physio-pathological theory. Med. Hypotheses 146, 110412 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  44. Bouhaddou, M. et al. The global phosphorylation landscape of SARS-CoV-2 infection. Cell 182, 685–712.e619 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  45. Mothes, R. et al. Distinct tissue niches direct lung immunopathology via CCL18 and CCL21 in severe COVID-19. Nat. Commun. 14, 791 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  46. McElvaney, O. F. et al. Protease-anti-protease compartmentalization in SARS-CoV-2 ARDS: therapeutic implications. EBioMedicine 77, 103894 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  47. Wang, Y. et al. Blood transcriptome responses in patients correlate with severity of COVID-19 disease. Front. Immunol. 13, 1043219 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  48. Koh, S. B. et al. CHK1 inhibition synergizes with gemcitabine initially by destabilizing the DNA replication apparatus. Cancer Res. 75, 3583–3595 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  49. Gong, D. J., Zhang, J. M., Yu, M., Zhuang, B. & Guo, Q. Q. Inhibition of SIRT1 combined with gemcitabine therapy for pancreatic carcinoma. Clin. Inter. Aging 8, 889–897 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  50. Chen, Y. et al. Succinate dehydrogenase deficiency-driven succinate accumulation induces drug resistance in acute myeloid leukemia via ubiquitin-cullin regulation. Nat. Commun. 15, 9820 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  51. Ting, S. Y., Yan, N. L., Schilke, B. A. & Craig, E. A. Dual interaction of scaffold protein Tim44 of mitochondrial import motor with channel-forming translocase subunit Tim23. Elife https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.23609 (2017).

  52. Werba, G. et al. Single-cell RNA sequencing reveals the effects of chemotherapy on human pancreatic adenocarcinoma and its tumor microenvironment. Nat. Commun. 14, 797 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  53. Liu, F., Gore, A. J., Wilson, J. L. & Korc, M. DUSP1 is a novel target for enhancing pancreatic cancer cell sensitivity to gemcitabine. PLoS ONE 9, e84982 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  54. Zhu, Y. Q. et al. Epigenetic activation of the CMTM6-IGF2BP1-EP300 positive feedback loop drives gemcitabine resistance in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. Adv. Sci. 11, e2406714 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  55. Urabe, M. et al. Mcl-1 expression is a predictive marker of response to gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel for metastatic pancreatic cancer. Sci. Rep. 14, 21953 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  56. Flint, S. M. et al. Leucocyte subset-specific type 1 interferon signatures in SLE and other immune-mediated diseases. RMD Open 2, e000183 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  57. Dai, M., Pei, X. & Wang, X. J. Accurate and fast cell marker gene identification with COSG. Brief Bioinform. https://doi.org/10.1093/bib/bbab579 (2022).

  58. Hao, Y. et al. Integrated analysis of multimodal single-cell data. Cell 184, 3573–3587.e3529 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  59. Korsunsky, I. et al. Fast, sensitive and accurate integration of single-cell data with Harmony. Nat. Methods 16, 1289–1296 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  60. Lachmann, A., Giorgi, F. M., Lopez, G. & Califano, A. ARACNe-AP: gene network reverse engineering through adaptive partitioning inference of mutual information. Bioinformatics 32, 2233–2235 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  61. Alvarez, M. J. et al. Functional characterization of somatic mutations in cancer using network-based inference of protein activity. Nat. Genet. 48, 838–847 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  62. Cao, J. et al. The single-cell transcriptional landscape of mammalian organogenesis. Nature 566, 496–502 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  63. Gulati, G. S. et al. Single-cell transcriptional diversity is a hallmark of developmental potential. Science 367, 405–411 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  64. Colaprico, A. et al. TCGAbiolinks: an R/Bioconductor package for integrative analysis of TCGA data. Nucleic Acids Res. 44, e71 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  65. Therneau, T. M. A Package for Survival Analysis in R. (CRAN, 2024).

  66. Wang, G. et al. CROST: a comprehensive repository of spatial transcriptomics. Nucleic Acids Res. 52, D882–d890 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  67. Huang, C. et al. Characterizing gene perturbations in single cells via network divergence analysis. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18767663 (2026).

  68. Huang, C. et al. Characterizing gene perturbations in single cells via network divergence analysis. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18760951 (2026).

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank Drs. Xuerui Yang, Xianwen Ren, Shiquan Sun, and Zhenhai Du for their constructive discussions. This work was supported by the following funding: National Natural Science Foundation of China (32370706 to Z.X., 32200522 to C.H., 82541006 to Y.X.); “Pioneer” and “Leading Goose” R&D Program of Zhejiang (2025C02060 to Q.X.); Zhejiang Provincial Natural Science Foundation of China (LRG26H160003 to Q.X.); Zhejiang Provincial Special Fund for Supporting Provincial-Level Scientific Research Institutes (00004ACYS202403 to Q.X.); China Postdoctoral Science Foundation (2023M732809 to C.H.) and Shaanxi Province Postdoctoral Support Program (2023BSHEDZZ68 to C.H.); Z.X. acknowledges support from the Youth Innovation Team Project of Xi’an Jiaotong University (xtr052025013, xtr052023008, and xtr052025012), the Qinchuangyuan High-level Innovative Entrepreneurial Talent Project (QCYRCXM-2022-337), and Key Research and Development Plan of Shaanxi Province of China (2024SF-ZDCYL-02-04). We thank OE Biotech Co., Ltd. for their assistance with the phosphoproteomics analysis.

Author information

Author notes
  1. These authors contributed equally: Chao Huang, Yuhan Li, Botao Fa.

  2. Lead contact.

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Institute of Molecular and Translational Medicine (IMTM), Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology (DBMB), Xi’an Jiaotong University Health Science Center, Xi’an, Shaanxi, China

    Chao Huang, Yuhan Li, Botao Fa, Zhenni Liu, Yixin Ma, Zhitao Zhang & Zhengtao Xiao

  2. Key Laboratory of Environment and Genes Related to Diseases, Xi’an Jiaotong University, Ministry of Education, Xi’an, Shaanxi, China

    Chao Huang, Yuhan Li, Botao Fa, Zhenni Liu, Yixin Ma, Zhitao Zhang & Zhengtao Xiao

  3. College of Medicine, Yan’an University, Yan’an, Shaanxi, China

    Jinglin Zhu

  4. Department of Cell Biology and Genetics, School of Basic Medical Sciences, Xi’an Jiaotong University Health Science Center, Xi’an, China

    Yungang Xu

  5. Zhejiang Key Laboratory of Tumor Molecular Diagnosis and Individualized Medicine, Zhejiang Provincial People’s Hospital, Affiliated People’s Hospital, Hangzhou Medical College, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China

    Qiuran Xu

  6. Department of Medical Oncology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Xi’an Jiaotong University, Xi’an, Shaanxi, P.R. China

    Zhengtao Xiao

Authors
  1. Chao Huang
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Yuhan Li
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Botao Fa
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Jinglin Zhu
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Zhenni Liu
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Yixin Ma
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Zhitao Zhang
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Yungang Xu
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Qiuran Xu
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  10. Zhengtao Xiao
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

Z.X. conceived and supervised the study. C.H. implemented the algorithm and performed data analyses with substantial assistance from Y.L., B.F., Y.M., and Z.Z.; Y.L. developed the GAT-based deep learning module under the supervision of Y.X.; J.Z. and Z.L. carried out the experimental validation under the supervision of Q.X.; Q.X. contributed to the revision of the manuscript and provided funding and materials for the experiments. C.H. and Z.X. wrote and revised the manuscript, and all authors reviewed and approved the final version.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Yungang Xu, Qiuran Xu or Zhengtao Xiao.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Peer review

Peer review information

Nature Communications thanks Longda Jiang and Ruidong Xue for their contribution to the peer review of this work. A peer review file is available.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Information (download PDF )

Description of Additional Supplementary Files (download PDF )

Supplementary Data 1 (download XLSX )

Reporting Summary (download PDF )

Transparent Peer Review file (download PDF )

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if you modified the licensed material. You do not have permission under this licence to share adapted material derived from this article or parts of it. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Huang, C., Li, Y., Fa, B. et al. Characterizing gene perturbations in single cells via network divergence analysis. Nat Commun (2026). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-026-71507-8

Download citation

  • Received: 17 November 2025

  • Accepted: 18 March 2026

  • Published: 11 April 2026

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-026-71507-8

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

Download PDF

Advertisement

Explore content

  • Research articles
  • Reviews & Analysis
  • News & Comment
  • Videos
  • Collections
  • Subjects
  • Follow us on Facebook
  • Follow us on X
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed

About the journal

  • Aims & Scope
  • Editors
  • Journal Information
  • Open Access Fees and Funding
  • Calls for Papers
  • Editorial Values Statement
  • Journal Metrics
  • Editors' Highlights
  • Contact
  • Editorial policies
  • Top Articles

Publish with us

  • For authors
  • For Reviewers
  • Language editing services
  • Open access funding
  • Submit manuscript

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

  • Explore articles by subject
  • Find a job
  • Guide to authors
  • Editorial policies

Nature Communications (Nat Commun)

ISSN 2041-1723 (online)

nature.com footer links

About Nature Portfolio

  • About us
  • Press releases
  • Press office
  • Contact us

Discover content

  • Journals A-Z
  • Articles by subject
  • protocols.io
  • Nature Index

Publishing policies

  • Nature portfolio policies
  • Open access

Author & Researcher services

  • Reprints & permissions
  • Research data
  • Language editing
  • Scientific editing
  • Nature Masterclasses
  • Research Solutions

Libraries & institutions

  • Librarian service & tools
  • Librarian portal
  • Open research
  • Recommend to library

Advertising & partnerships

  • Advertising
  • Partnerships & Services
  • Media kits
  • Branded content

Professional development

  • Nature Awards
  • Nature Careers
  • Nature Conferences

Regional websites

  • Nature Africa
  • Nature China
  • Nature India
  • Nature Japan
  • Nature Middle East
  • Privacy Policy
  • Use of cookies
  • Legal notice
  • Accessibility statement
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Your US state privacy rights
Springer Nature

© 2026 Springer Nature Limited

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing