Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Advertisement

Nature Communications
  • View all journals
  • Search
  • My Account Login
  • Content Explore content
  • About the journal
  • Publish with us
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed
  1. nature
  2. nature communications
  3. articles
  4. article
RESCUE: recovery of unattributed expression patterns in spatial transcriptomics
Download PDF
Download PDF
  • Article
  • Open access
  • Published: 10 April 2026

RESCUE: recovery of unattributed expression patterns in spatial transcriptomics

  • Young Joo Lee1,
  • Seokjin Yeo2,
  • Alex W. Schrader  ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0003-0235-79033,
  • JuYeon Lee3,
  • Ian M. Traniello4,
  • Marisa Asadian  ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0002-3554-22783,
  • Amy Cash Ahmed5,
  • Gene E. Robinson  ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0003-4828-40685,6,7,
  • Hee-Sun Han  ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0003-3616-291X2,3,5,6 &
  • …
  • Sihai Dave Zhao  ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0001-5980-50711,5 

Nature Communications (2026) Cite this article

  • 3158 Accesses

  • Metrics details

We are providing an unedited version of this manuscript to give early access to its findings. Before final publication, the manuscript will undergo further editing. Please note there may be errors present which affect the content, and all legal disclaimers apply.

Subjects

  • Computational models
  • Statistical methods

Abstract

Spatial transcriptomics (ST) enables gene expression profiling while preserving the spatial architecture of intact tissue. Analyzing ST data often proceeds by first extracting cell-level information, typically through cell segmentation or cell-type deconvolution. However, a critical oversight has been that a substantial portion of molecular expression is systematically lost or unannotated by these methods. This lost expression can arise from diverse and biologically important sources like fragile or underrepresented cell types, subcellular structures like neurites, and extracellular expression. These omissions can result in biased analyses and incorrect or incomplete biological interpretations. We describe a new computational method, RESCUE, that can recover the unattributed spatial expression patterns missed by existing ST analysis methods and enable robust inference even when reference is incomplete. We validate RESCUE using MERFISH data from the honey bee brain and apply it to multiple ST datasets to demonstrate how it can reveal novel insights into complex tissue biology.

Similar content being viewed by others

Systematic comparison of sequencing-based spatial transcriptomic methods

Article Open access 04 July 2024

Deciphering tissue structure and function using spatial transcriptomics

Article Open access 10 March 2022

Construction of a 3D whole organism spatial atlas by joint modelling of multiple slices with deep neural networks

Article 19 October 2023

Data availability

The honey bee brain MERFISH data used in this study is deposited in our GitHub repository: https://github.com/brunoyjlee/RESCUE/tree/main/data. The honey bee brain scRNA-seq data48 is available at https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.16832518. The human breast cancer dataset5 is available via GEO with accession ID GSE243280. The human DLPFC dataset60 is available at https://github.com/LieberInstitute/spatialLIBD. The cichlid fish brain dataset61 is available via GEO with accession ID GSE217619. Source data are provided with this paper.

Code availability

RESCUE is available as an R package at https://github.com/brunoyjlee/RESCUE. Codes for the version of RESCUE used in this paper are also deposited at Zenodo88 (https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18965449).

References

  1. Rao, A., Barkley, D., França, G. S. & Yanai, I. Exploring tissue architecture using spatial transcriptomics. Nature 596, 211–220 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Moses, L. & Pachter, L. Museum of spatial transcriptomics. Nat. Methods 19, 534–546 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Chen, K. H., Boettiger, A. N., Moffitt, J. R., Wang, S. & Zhuang, X. Spatially resolved, highly multiplexed RNA profiling in single cells. Science https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aaa6090 (2015).

  4. Nagendran, M. et al. 1457 Visium HD enables spatially resolved, single-cell scale resolution mapping of FFPE human breast cancer tissue. J. Immunother. Cancer 11, A1620–A1620 (2023).

  5. Janesick, A. et al. High resolution mapping of the tumor microenvironment using integrated single-cell, spatial and in situ analysis. Nat. Commun. 14, 8353 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Stringer, C., Wang, T., Michaelos, M. & Pachitariu, M. Cellpose: a generalist algorithm for cellular segmentation. Nat. Methods 18, 100–106 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Petukhov, V. et al. Cell segmentation in imaging-based spatial transcriptomics. Nat. Biotechnol. 40, 345–354 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Polański, K. et al. Bin2cell reconstructs cells from high resolution Visium HD data. Bioinformatics 40, btae546 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Ståhl, P. L. et al. Visualization and analysis of gene expression in tissue sections by spatial transcriptomics. Science 353, 78–82 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Rodriques, S. G. et al. Slide-seq: a scalable technology for measuring genome-wide expression at high spatial resolution. Science 363, 1463–1467 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Stickels, R. R. et al. Highly sensitive spatial transcriptomics at near-cellular resolution with Slide-seqV2. Nat. Biotechnol. 39, 313–319 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  12. Elosua-Bayes, M., Nieto, P., Mereu, E., Gut, I. & Heyn, H. SPOTlight: seeded NMF regression to deconvolute spatial transcriptomics spots with single-cell transcriptomes. Nucleic Acids Res. 49, e50 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  13. Cable, D. M. et al. Robust decomposition of cell type mixtures in spatial transcriptomics. Nat. Biotechnol. 40, 517–526 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  14. Ma, Y. & Zhou, X. Spatially informed cell-type deconvolution for spatial transcriptomics. Nat. Biotechnol. 40, 1349–1359 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  15. Zhou, Z., Zhong, Y., Zhang, Z. & Ren, X. Spatial transcriptomics deconvolution at single-cell resolution using Redeconve. Nat. Commun. 14, 7930 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  16. Liu, Z., Wu, D., Zhai, W. & Ma, L. SONAR enables cell type deconvolution with spatially weighted Poisson-Gamma model for spatial transcriptomics. Nat. Commun. 14, 4727 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  17. Si, Y. et al. FICTURE: scalable segmentation-free analysis of submicron-resolution spatial transcriptomics. Nat. Methods 21, 1843–1854 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  18. Mitchel, J., Gao, T., Petukhov, V., Cole, E. & Kharchenko, P. V. Impact of segmentation errors in analysis of spatial transcriptomics. Nat. Genet. 58, 434–444 (2026).

  19. Nguyen, H., Nguyen, H., Tran, D., Draghici, S. & Nguyen, T. Fourteen years of cellular deconvolution: methodology, applications, technical evaluation and outstanding challenges. Nucleic Acids Res. 52, 4761–4783 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  20. Garmire, L. X. et al. Challenges and perspectives in computational deconvolution of genomics data. Nat. Methods 21, 391–400 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  21. Gaspard-Boulinc, L. C., Gortana, L., Walter, T., Barillot, E. & Cavalli, F. M. G. Cell-type deconvolution methods for spatial transcriptomics. Nat. Rev. Genet. 1–19 https://doi.org/10.1038/s41576-025-00845-y (2015).

  22. Ament, S. A. & Poulopoulos, A. The brain’s dark transcriptome: sequencing RNA in distal compartments of neurons and glia. Curr. Opin. Neurobiol. 81, 102725 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  23. Ivich, A. et al. Missing cell types in single-cell references impact deconvolution of bulk data but are detectable. Genome Biol. 26, 86 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  24. Han, J. et al. Single-cell sequencing unveils key contributions of immune cell populations in cancer-associated adipose wasting. Cell Discov. 8, 122 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  25. Fetit, R. et al. Characterizing neutrophil subtypes in cancer using scRNA sequencing demonstrates the importance of IL1β/CXCR2 axis in generation of metastasis-specific neutrophils. Cancer Res. Commun. 4, 588–606 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  26. Sutton, M. A. et al. Miniature neurotransmission stabilizes synaptic function via tonic suppression of local dendritic protein synthesis. Cell 125, 785–799 (2006).

    Google Scholar 

  27. Cajigas, I. J. et al. The local transcriptome in the synaptic neuropil revealed by deep sequencing and high-resolution imaging. Neuron 74, 453–466 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  28. Hafner, A.-S., Donlin-Asp, P. G., Leitch, B., Herzog, E. & Schuman, E. M. Local protein synthesis is a ubiquitous feature of neuronal pre- and postsynaptic compartments. Science 364, eaau3644 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  29. Glock, C. et al. The translatome of neuronal cell bodies, dendrites, and axons. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 118, e2113929118 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  30. von Kügelgen, N. & Chekulaeva, M. Conservation of a core neurite transcriptome across neuronal types and species. WIREs RNA 11, e1590 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  31. Lee, K.-W., Kim, H.-J., Sung, J.-J., Park, K.-S. & Kim, M. Defective neurite outgrowth in aphidicolin/cAMP-induced motor neurons expressing mutant Cu/Zn superoxide dismutase. Int. J. Dev. Neurosci. 20, 521–526 (2002).

    Google Scholar 

  32. Markmiller, S. et al. Persistent mRNA localization defects and cell death in ALS neurons caused by transient cellular stress. Cell Rep. 36, 109685 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  33. Buxbaum, A. R., Haimovich, G. & Singer, R. H. In the right place at the right time: visualizing and understanding mRNA localization. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 16, 95–109 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  34. Gandalovičová, A., Vomastek, T., Rosel, D. & Brábek, J. Cell polarity signaling in the plasticity of cancer cell invasiveness. Oncotarget 7, 25022–25049 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  35. Backlund, M. et al. Plasticity of nuclear and cytoplasmic stress responses of RNA-binding proteins. Nucleic Acids Res. 48, 4725–4740 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  36. Apicco, D. J. et al. Reducing the RNA binding protein TIA1 protects against tau-mediated neurodegeneration in vivo. Nat. Neurosci. 21, 72–80 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  37. Wolozin, B. & Ivanov, P. Stress granules and neurodegeneration. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 20, 649–666 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  38. Ridder, K. et al. Extracellular vesicle-mediated transfer of functional RNA in the tumor microenvironment. OncoImmunology 4, e1008371 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  39. Li, I. & Nabet, B. Y. Exosomes in the tumor microenvironment as mediators of cancer therapy resistance. Mol. Cancer 18, 32 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  40. O’Brien, K., Breyne, K., Ughetto, S., Laurent, L. C. & Breakefield, X. O. RNA delivery by extracellular vesicles in mammalian cells and its applications. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 21, 585–606 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  41. Landry, F. J. & Findlay, S. R. Purification of human basophils by negative selection. J. Immunol. Methods 63, 329–336 (1983).

    Google Scholar 

  42. Hansel, T. T. et al. Purification of human blood eosinophils by negative selection using immunomagnetic beads. J. Immunol. Methods 122, 97–103 (1989).

    Google Scholar 

  43. Hansel, T. T. et al. An improved immunomagnetic procedure for the isolation of highly purified human blood eosinophils. J. Immunol. Methods 145, 105–110 (1991).

    Google Scholar 

  44. Munoz, N. M. & Leff, A. R. Highly purified selective isolation of eosinophils from human peripheral blood by negative immunomagnetic selection. Nat. Protoc. 1, 2613–2620 (2006).

    Google Scholar 

  45. She, Y. & Owen, A. B. Outlier detection using nonconvex penalized regression. J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 106, 626–639 (2011).

    Google Scholar 

  46. Lee, Y., MacEachern, S. N. & Jung, Y. Regularization of case-specific parameters for robustness and efficiency. Stat. Sci. 27, 350–372 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  47. Kong, D., Bondell, H. D. & Wu, Y. Fully efficient robust estimation, outlier detection and variable selection via penalized regression. Stat. Sin. 28, 1031–1052 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  48. Traniello, I. M. et al. Single-cell dissection of aggression in honeybee colonies. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 7, 1232–1244 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  49. Lin, L. I.-K. A concordance correlation coefficient to evaluate reproducibility. Biometrics 45, 255–268 (1989).

    Google Scholar 

  50. Kumar, A. et al. Intracellular spatial transcriptomic analysis toolkit (InSTAnT). Nat. Commun. 15, 7794 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  51. Kim, Y. et al. SpaceExpress enables differential spatial transcriptomics with natural coordinate systems. 2024.12.19.628720 Preprint at https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.12.19.628720 (2025).

  52. Yeo, S., Schrader, A. W., Lee, J., Asadian, M. & Han, H.-S. Spot-based global registration for subpixel stitching of single-molecule resolution images for tissue-scale spatial transcriptomics. Anal. Chem. 96, 6517–6522 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  53. Wang, G. et al. Spatial organization of the transcriptome in individual neurons. 2020.12.07.414060 Preprint at https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.12.07.414060 (2020).

  54. Moffitt, J. R. et al. High-performance multiplexed fluorescence in situ hybridization in culture and tissue with matrix imprinting and clearing. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 113, 14456–14461 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  55. Wang, G., Moffitt, J. R. & Zhuang, X. Multiplexed imaging of high-density libraries of RNAs with MERFISH and expansion microscopy. Sci. Rep. 8, 4847 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  56. Khaledian, B., Thibes, L. & Shimono, Y. Adipocyte regulation of cancer stem cells. Cancer Sci. 114, 4134–4144 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  57. Hu, X. et al. Decorin-mediated suppression of tumorigenesis, invasion, and metastasis in inflammatory breast cancer. Commun. Biol. 4, 72 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  58. Cai, R. et al. Primary breast tumor induced extracellular matrix remodeling in premetastatic lungs. Sci. Rep. 13, 18566 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  59. de Freitas Oliveira-Tore, C. et al. Non-canonical extracellular complement pathways and the complosome paradigm in cancer: a scoping review. Front. Immunol. 16, 1519465 (2025).

  60. Maynard, K. R. et al. Transcriptome-scale spatial gene expression in the human dorsolateral prefrontal cortex. Nat. Neurosci. 24, 425–436 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  61. Johnson, Z. V. et al. Cellular profiling of a recently-evolved social behavior in cichlid fishes. Nat. Commun. 14, 4891 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  62. Lake, B. B. et al. A comparative strategy for single-nucleus and single-cell transcriptomes confirms accuracy in predicted cell-type expression from nuclear RNA. Sci. Rep. 7, 6031 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  63. Habib, N. et al. Massively parallel single-nucleus RNA-seq with DroNc-seq. Nat. Methods 14, 955–958 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  64. DeFelipe, J. et al. Cortical white matter: beyond the pale remarks, main conclusions and discussion. Front. Neuroanat. 4, 1692 (2010).

    Google Scholar 

  65. Ritchie, M. E. et al. limma powers differential expression analyses for RNA-sequencing and microarray studies. Nucleic Acids Res. 43, e47 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  66. Sakers, K. et al. Astrocytes locally translate transcripts in their peripheral processes. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 114, E3830–E3838 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  67. Jiang, T. et al. The lncRNA MALAT1/miR-30/Spastin Axis Regulates Hippocampal Neurite Outgrowth. Front. Cell. Neurosci. 14, 555747 (2020).

  68. Overly, C. C., Rieff, H. I. & Hollenbeck, P. J. Organelle motility and metabolism in axons vs dendrites of cultured hippocampal neurons. J. Cell Sci. 109, 971–980 (1996).

    Google Scholar 

  69. Harris, J. J., Jolivet, R. & Attwell, D. Synaptic energy use and supply. Neuron 75, 762–777 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  70. Than-Trong, E. & Bally-Cuif, L. Radial glia and neural progenitors in the adult zebrafish central nervous system. Glia 63, 1406–1428 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  71. Miranda-Negrón, Y. & García-Arrarás, J. E. Radial glia and radial glia-like cells: Their role in neurogenesis and regeneration. Front. Neurosci. 16, 1006037 (2022).

  72. Zhu, J., Sun, S. & Zhou, X. SPARK-X: non-parametric modeling enables scalable and robust detection of spatial expression patterns for large spatial transcriptomic studies. Genome Biol. 22, 184 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  73. Abramsson, A. et al. The zebrafish amyloid precursor protein-b is required for motor neuron guidance and synapse formation. Dev. Biol. 381, 377–388 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  74. Newman, M., Ebrahimie, E. & Lardelli, M. Using the zebrafish model for Alzheimer’s disease research. Front. Genet. 5, 189 (2014).

  75. Haenisch, C. et al. The neuronal growth and regeneration associated Cntn1 (F3/F11/Contactin) gene is duplicated in fish: expression during development and retinal axon regeneration. Mol. Cell. Neurosci. 28, 361–374 (2005).

    Google Scholar 

  76. Eiraku, M. et al. DNER acts as a neuron-specific Notch ligand during Bergmann glial development. Nat. Neurosci. 8, 873–880 (2005).

    Google Scholar 

  77. Díaz-Ramos, À., Roig-Borrellas, A., García-Melero, A. & López-Alemany, R. α-Enolase, a multifunctional protein: its role on pathophysiological situations. BioMed. Res. Int. 2012, 156795 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  78. Zhou, Z., Li, X., Wright, J., Candès, E. & Ma, Y. Stable principal component pursuit. in 2010 IEEE International Symposium on Information Theory 1518–1522 https://doi.org/10.1109/ISIT.2010.5513535 (2010).

  79. Mateos, G. & Giannakis, G. B. Robust PCA as bilinear decomposition with outlier-sparsity regularization. Trans. Sig. Proc. 60, 5176–5190 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  80. Manabe, R. et al. Transcriptome-based systematic identification of extracellular matrix proteins. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 105, 12849–12854 (2008).

    Google Scholar 

  81. Giannakis, G. B., Mateos, G., Farahmand, S., Kekatos, V. & Zhu, H. USPACOR: Universal sparsity-controlling outlier rejection. in 2011 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP) 1952–1955 https://doi.org/10.1109/ICASSP.2011.5946891 (2011).

  82. Huang, P., Cai, M., Lu, X., McKennan, C. & Wang, J. Accurate estimation of rare cell-type fractions from tissue omics data via hierarchical deconvolution. Ann. Appl. Stat. 18, 1178–1194 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  83. Zhong, Y. & Liu, Z. Gene expression deconvolution in linear space. Nat. Methods 9, 8–9 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  84. Hicks, S. C., Townes, F. W., Teng, M. & Irizarry, R. A. Missing data and technical variability in single-cell RNA-sequencing experiments. Biostatistics 19, 562–578 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  85. Townes, F. W., Hicks, S. C., Aryee, M. J. & Irizarry, R. A. Feature selection and dimension reduction for single-cell RNA-Seq based on a multinomial model. Genome Biol. 20, 295 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  86. Mu, X. et al. Single-nucleus and spatial transcriptomics identify brain landscape of gene regulatory networks associated with behavioral maturation in honeybees. Nat. Commun. 16, 3343 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  87. Butler, A., Hoffman, P., Smibert, P., Papalexi, E. & Satija, R. Integrating single-cell transcriptomic data across different conditions, technologies, and species. Nat. Biotechnol. 36, 411–420 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  88. Lee, Y. J. et al. RESCUE: recovery of unattributed expression patterns in spatial transcriptomics. Zenodo https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18965449.

  89. Yu, G., Wang, L.-G., Han, Y. & He, Q.-Y. clusterProfiler: an R package for comparing biological themes among gene clusters. OMICS A J. Integr. Biol. 16, 284–287 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank Dr. Tina Barbasch on valuable discussions on the analysis of fish brain data. Funding: This work was supported by the National Institutes of Health (R21HG013180 to H.-S.H. and S.D.Z., R35GM147420 to H.-S.H. and R01AT013189 to S.D.Z.).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Statistics, University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL, USA

    Young Joo Lee & Sihai Dave Zhao

  2. Department of Bioengineering, University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL, USA

    Seokjin Yeo & Hee-Sun Han

  3. Department of Chemistry, University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL, USA

    Alex W. Schrader, JuYeon Lee, Marisa Asadian & Hee-Sun Han

  4. Lewis-Sigler Institute for Integrative Genomics, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ, USA

    Ian M. Traniello

  5. Carl R. Woese Institute of Genomic Biology, University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL, USA

    Amy Cash Ahmed, Gene E. Robinson, Hee-Sun Han & Sihai Dave Zhao

  6. Neuroscience Program, University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL, USA

    Gene E. Robinson & Hee-Sun Han

  7. Department of Entomology, University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL, USA

    Gene E. Robinson

Authors
  1. Young Joo Lee
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Seokjin Yeo
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Alex W. Schrader
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  4. JuYeon Lee
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Ian M. Traniello
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Marisa Asadian
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Amy Cash Ahmed
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Gene E. Robinson
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Hee-Sun Han
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  10. Sihai Dave Zhao
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

Y.J.L., H.-S.H., and S.D.Z. conceptualized the problem and developed the methodology. Y.J.L. performed the numerical studies, interpreted the results, and developed the software. S.Y. and A.W.S. performed data processing and cell segmentation on honey bee MERFISH data. J.L. and M.A. generated honey bee MERFISH dataset. J.L. and I.M.T. selected the gene panel for honey bee MERFISH experiments. I.M.T. and A.C.A. collected honey bee brains. Y.J.L., H.-S.H., and S.D.Z. wrote the manuscript with feedback from G.E.R. H.-S.H. and S.D.Z. supervised the project.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Hee-Sun Han or Sihai Dave Zhao.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Peer review

Peer review information

Nature Communications thanks Guoqiang Li and the other, anonymous, reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work. A peer review file is available.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Information (download PDF )

Transparent Peer Review file (download PDF )

Reporting Summary (download PDF )

Description of Additional Supplementary Files (download PDF )

Supplementary Data 1 (download XLSX )

Source data

Source Data (download XLSX )

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if you modified the licensed material. You do not have permission under this licence to share adapted material derived from this article or parts of it. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Lee, Y.J., Yeo, S., Schrader, A.W. et al. RESCUE: recovery of unattributed expression patterns in spatial transcriptomics. Nat Commun (2026). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-026-71720-5

Download citation

  • Received: 17 September 2025

  • Accepted: 26 March 2026

  • Published: 10 April 2026

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-026-71720-5

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

Download PDF

Advertisement

Explore content

  • Research articles
  • Reviews & Analysis
  • News & Comment
  • Videos
  • Collections
  • Subjects
  • Follow us on Facebook
  • Follow us on X
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed

About the journal

  • Aims & Scope
  • Editors
  • Journal Information
  • Open Access Fees and Funding
  • Calls for Papers
  • Editorial Values Statement
  • Journal Metrics
  • Editors' Highlights
  • Contact
  • Editorial policies
  • Top Articles

Publish with us

  • For authors
  • For Reviewers
  • Language editing services
  • Open access funding
  • Submit manuscript

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

  • Explore articles by subject
  • Find a job
  • Guide to authors
  • Editorial policies

Nature Communications (Nat Commun)

ISSN 2041-1723 (online)

nature.com footer links

About Nature Portfolio

  • About us
  • Press releases
  • Press office
  • Contact us

Discover content

  • Journals A-Z
  • Articles by subject
  • protocols.io
  • Nature Index

Publishing policies

  • Nature portfolio policies
  • Open access

Author & Researcher services

  • Reprints & permissions
  • Research data
  • Language editing
  • Scientific editing
  • Nature Masterclasses
  • Research Solutions

Libraries & institutions

  • Librarian service & tools
  • Librarian portal
  • Open research
  • Recommend to library

Advertising & partnerships

  • Advertising
  • Partnerships & Services
  • Media kits
  • Branded content

Professional development

  • Nature Awards
  • Nature Careers
  • Nature Conferences

Regional websites

  • Nature Africa
  • Nature China
  • Nature India
  • Nature Japan
  • Nature Middle East
  • Privacy Policy
  • Use of cookies
  • Legal notice
  • Accessibility statement
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Your US state privacy rights
Springer Nature

© 2026 Springer Nature Limited

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing