Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Advertisement

Nature Communications
  • View all journals
  • Search
  • My Account Login
  • Content Explore content
  • About the journal
  • Publish with us
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed
  1. nature
  2. nature communications
  3. articles
  4. article
Medullary cavity expansion is mediated by distinct cell populations during fetal bone development
Download PDF
Download PDF
  • Article
  • Open access
  • Published: 14 April 2026

Medullary cavity expansion is mediated by distinct cell populations during fetal bone development

  • Eriko Sumiya  ORCID: orcid.org/0009-0005-7086-32871 nAff15,
  • Kohei Saeki2,
  • Kenta Nakano  ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0003-2617-14683,
  • Chie Kikutake4,
  • Noriko Kurisaki1,
  • Natsuko Nakaima5,
  • Mami Kurumata-Shigeto1,
  • Yumiko Kitada1,
  • Yuka Morioka6 nAff16,
  • Yasuhiro Go  ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0003-4581-03257,8,9,
  • Mikita Suyama  ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0001-9526-31934,
  • Yuki Yoshimura  ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0001-7092-668310 nAff17,
  • Motohito Goto  ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0001-6288-458310,
  • Mamoru Ito  ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0002-5373-822310,
  • Manabu Nakayama  ORCID: orcid.org/0009-0001-0488-166411,
  • Haruhiko Akiyama12,13,
  • Lucie Peduto  ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0003-2414-440714,
  • Tadashi Okamura  ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0001-8457-15613,
  • Yuki Matsushita  ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0001-9577-32495 &
  • …
  • Shinichiro Sawa  ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0002-8850-446X1 

Nature Communications , Article number:  (2026) Cite this article

  • 221 Accesses

  • 8 Altmetric

  • Metrics details

We are providing an unedited version of this manuscript to give early access to its findings. Before final publication, the manuscript will undergo further editing. Please note there may be errors present which affect the content, and all legal disclaimers apply.

Subjects

  • Bone development
  • Development

Abstract

Bone marrow (BM) is the primary site of postnatal hematopoiesis, yet how it is established during embryogenesis remains poorly understood. BM formation is initiated by the invasion of vascular and mesenchymal cells into a preformed cartilage template, generating the primary ossification center (POC). Here, we identify CD55+CD90+ mesenchymal cells as early regulators of osteoclastogenesis within the POC. These cells share a matrix-degrading transcriptional program with FABP5+ septoclasts that localize to the chondro-osseous interface of developing bone. Fate-mapping analyses reveal that CD55+CD90+ cells transiently give rise to septoclasts during perinatal development, whereas osteoclast-supporting activity is subsequently assumed by LepR+ bone marrow stromal cells (BMSCs). During fracture repair, FABP5+ septoclasts and LepR+ BMSCs are redeployed within the callus, indicating reactivation of a developmental osteogenic program. Together, our findings uncover a conserved mechanism that links skeletal remodeling to the establishment of the BM microenvironment required for hematopoiesis.

Similar content being viewed by others

Characterization of mesenchymal stem cells in human fetal bone marrow by single-cell transcriptomic and functional analysis

Article Open access 31 March 2023

Osteogenic differentiation of human mesenchymal stromal cells and fibroblasts differs depending on tissue origin and replicative senescence

Article Open access 07 June 2021

Modeling the chondrocyte-derived osteoblasts formation process reveals its molecular signature and regulation network

Article Open access 09 February 2026

Data availability

Sequencing data that support the findings of this study have been deposited in the Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO): GSE228319 (RNA-seq and scRNA-seq data) [https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/query/acc.cgi?acc=GSE228319], GSE315785 (scRNA-seq data) [https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/query/acc.cgi?acc=GSE315785], GSE154247 (scRNA-seq data) [https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/query/acc.cgi?acc=GSE154247]. All other data supporting the findings of this study are available within the paper and its Supplementary Information files. Source data are provided with this paper.

Code availability

Code used for the analyses is available at Zenodo [https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19034907].

References

  1. Lucas, D. Structural organization of the bone marrow and its role in hematopoiesis. Curr. Opin. Hematol. 28, 36–42 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Tikhonova, A. N., Lasry, A., Austin, R. & Aifantis, I. Cell-by-Cell deconstruction of stem cell niches. Cell Stem Cell 27, 19–34 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Salhotra, A., Shah, H. N., Levi, B. & Longaker, M. T. Mechanisms of bone development and repair. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 21, 696–711 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Coskun, S. et al. Development of the fetal bone marrow niche and regulation of HSC quiescence and homing ability by emerging osteolineage cells. Cell Rep. 9, 581–590 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Maes, C. et al. Osteoblast precursors, but not mature osteoblasts, move into developing and fractured bones along with invading blood vessels. Dev. Cell 19, 329–344 (2010).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Mizoguchi, T. et al. Osterix marks distinct waves of primitive and definitive stromal progenitors during bone marrow development. Dev. Cell 29, 340–349 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Matsushita, Y. et al. The fate of early perichondrial cells in developing bones. Nat. Commun. 13, 7319 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Mesnieres, M. et al. Fetal hematopoietic stem cell homing is controlled by VEGF, regulating the integrity and oxidative status of the stromal-vascular bone marrow niches. Cell Rep. 36, 109618 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Yoshida, H. et al. The murine mutation osteopetrosis is in the coding region of the macrophage colony-stimulating factor gene. Nature 345, 442–444 (1990).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Blair, H. C. & Zaidi, M. Osteoclastic differentiation and function regulated by old and new pathways. Rev. Endocr. Metab. Disord. 7, 23–32 (2006).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Kong, Y. Y. et al. OPGL is a key regulator of osteoclastogenesis, lymphocyte development and lymph-node organogenesis. Nature 397, 315–323 (1999).

    Google Scholar 

  12. Jacome-Galarza, C. E. et al. Developmental origin, functional maintenance and genetic rescue of osteoclasts. Nature 568, 541–545 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  13. Yahara, Y. et al. Erythromyeloid progenitors give rise to a population of osteoclasts that contribute to bone homeostasis and repair. Nat. Cell Biol. 22, 49–59 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  14. Komatsu, N. et al. Plasma cells promote osteoclastogenesis and periarticular bone loss in autoimmune arthritis. J. Clin. Invest 131, e143060 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  15. Nonaka, D. et al. Fibroblast-derived CSF1 maintains colonization of gut mucosal macrophages to resist bacterial infection. Mucosal Immunol. 18, 1113–1123 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  16. Suzuki, E. & Nakayama, M. VCre/VloxP and SCre/SloxP: new site-specific recombination systems for genome engineering. Nucleic Acids Res 39, e49 (2011).

    Google Scholar 

  17. Yoshimura, Y. et al. Novel reporter and deleter mouse strains generated using VCre/VloxP and SCre/SloxP systems, and their system specificity in mice. Transgenic Res 27, 193–201 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  18. Engsig, M. T. et al. Matrix metalloproteinase 9 and vascular endothelial growth factor are essential for osteoclast recruitment into developing long bones. J. Cell Biol. 151, 879–890 (2000).

    Google Scholar 

  19. Inada, M. et al. Critical roles for collagenase-3 (Mmp13) in the development of growth plate cartilage and in endochondral ossification. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 101, 17192–17197 (2004).

    Google Scholar 

  20. Zhou, Z. et al. Impaired endochondral ossification and angiogenesis in mice deficient in membrane-type matrix metalloproteinase I. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 97, 4052–4057 (2000).

    Google Scholar 

  21. Holmbeck, K. et al. MT1-MMP-deficient mice develop dwarfism, osteopenia, arthritis, and connective tissue disease due to inadequate collagen turnover. Cell 99, 81–92 (1999).

    Google Scholar 

  22. Stickens, D. et al. Altered endochondral bone development in matrix metalloproteinase 13-deficient mice. Development 131, 5883–5895 (2004).

    Google Scholar 

  23. Vu, T. H. et al. MMP-9/Gelatinase B Is a Key Regulator of Growth Plate Angiogenesis and Apoptosis of Hypertrophic Chondrocytes. Cell 93, 411–422 (1998).

    Google Scholar 

  24. Okamoto, K. & Takayanagi, H. Osteoimmunology. Cold. Spring Harb. Perspect. Med. 9, a031245 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  25. Nakanishi, R. et al. Osteoblast-targeted expression of Sfrp4 in mice results in low bone mass. J. Bone Min. Res 23, 271–277 (2008).

    Google Scholar 

  26. Sivaraj, K. K. et al. Mesenchymal stromal cell-derived septoclasts resorb cartilage during developmental ossification and fracture healing. Nat. Commun. 13, 571 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  27. Lee, E. R., Lamplugh, L., Shepard, N. L. & Mort, J. S. The septoclast, a cathepsin B-rich cell involved in the resorption of growth plate cartilage. J. Histochem Cytochem 43, 525–536 (1995).

    Google Scholar 

  28. Bando, Y. et al. Expression of epidermal fatty acid binding protein (E-FABP) in septoclasts in the growth plate cartilage of mice. J. Mol. Histol. 45, 507–518 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  29. Claes, L., Recknagel, S. & Ignatius, A. Fracture healing under healthy and inflammatory conditions. Nat. Rev. Rheumatol. 8, 133–143 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  30. Baccin, C. et al. Combined single-cell and spatial transcriptomics reveal the molecular, cellular and spatial bone marrow niche organization. Nat. Cell Biol. 22, 38–48 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  31. Nookaew, I. et al. Refining the identity of mesenchymal cell types associated with murine periosteal and endosteal bone. J. Biol. Chem. 300, 107158 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  32. Hu, Y. et al. RANKL from bone marrow adipose lineage cells promotes osteoclast formation and bone loss. EMBO Rep. 22, e52481 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  33. Lu, J. et al. Bone marrow adipogenic lineage precursors are the major regulators of bone resorption in adult mice. Bone Res 13, 39 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  34. Bando, Y. et al. ETS1 promotes the expression of Ctsb and Mmp13 during the differentiation of septoclasts from pericytes. Cell Tissue Res. 401, 29–42 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  35. Yan, M. et al. Identification of an intronic enhancer regulating RANKL expression in osteocytic cells. Bone Res. 11, 43 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  36. Logan, M. et al. Expression of Cre Recombinase in the developing mouse limb bud driven by a Prxl enhancer. Genesis 33, 77–80 (2002).

    Google Scholar 

  37. Qian, B.-Z. et al. CCL2 recruits inflammatory monocytes to facilitate breast-tumor metastasis. Nature 475, 222–225 (2011).

    Google Scholar 

  38. Madisen, L. et al. A robust and high-throughput Cre reporting and characterization system for the whole mouse brain. Nat. Neurosci. 13, 133–140 (2010).

    Google Scholar 

  39. Rivers, L. E. et al. PDGFRA/NG2 glia generate myelinating oligodendrocytes and piriform projection neurons in adult mice. Nat. Neurosci. 11, 1392–1401 (2008).

    Google Scholar 

  40. Taniguchi, H. et al. A resource of Cre driver lines for genetic targeting of GABAergic neurons in the cerebral cortex. Neuron 71, 995–1013 (2011).

    Google Scholar 

  41. Kalajzic, I. et al. Use of type I collagen green fluorescent protein transgenes to identify subpopulations of cells at different stages of the osteoblast lineage. J. Bone Min. Res 17, 15–25 (2002).

    Google Scholar 

  42. Schonig, K. Stringent doxycycline-dependent control of CRE recombinase in vivo. Nucleic Acids Res. 30, 134e–134e (2002).

    Google Scholar 

  43. Kim, Y. et al. Generation of transgenic mice for conditional overexpression of Sox9. J. Bone Miner. Metab. 29, 123–129 (2011).

    Google Scholar 

  44. Fumoto, T., Takeshita, S., Ito, M. & Ikeda, K. Physiological functions of osteoblast lineage and T cell-derived RANKL in bone homeostasis. J. Bone Miner. Res. 29, 830–842 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  45. Gochi, K. et al. A novel stromal cell source of RANKL during sustained osteoclast activation in disuse osteoporosis. J. Physiol. 604, 1235–1254 (2026).

    Google Scholar 

  46. Dulauroy, S., Di Carlo, S. E., Langa, F., Eberl, G. & Peduto, L. Lineage tracing and genetic ablation of ADAM12(+) perivascular cells identify a major source of profibrotic cells during acute tissue injury. Nat. Med. 18, 1262–1270 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  47. Kim, D., Paggi, J. M., Park, C., Bennett, C. & Salzberg, S. L. Graph-based genome alignment and genotyping with HISAT2 and HISAT-genotype. Nat. Biotechnol. 37, 907–915 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  48. Liao, Y., Smyth, G. K. & Shi, W. featureCounts: an efficient general-purpose program for assigning sequence reads to genomic features. Bioinformatics 30, 923–930 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  49. Love, M. I., Huber, W. & Anders, S. Moderated estimation of fold change and dispersion for RNA-seq data with DESeq2. Genome Biol. 15, 550 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  50. Hao, Y. et al. Integrated analysis of multimodal single-cell data. Cell 184, 3573–3587.e3529 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We thank members of the Sawa lab: D. Nonaka, M. Watanabe, K. Tanaka, M. Kobayashi, T. Furukawa and M. Ezawa for assistance with experiments; A. Yano for contribution to administrative work related to this project. We thank H. Murota, M. Tanaka and K. Kageyama for embryonic engineering of mice. We also thank members of the Research Promotion Unit of the Medical Institute of Bioregulation, Kyushu University, for supporting mouse experiments. We thank H. Ishikawa, K. Ichikawa and T. Akinaga for help with scRNA-seq experiments. We are grateful to M. Shinohara and T. Saito for insightful comments on this work. This work was funded by KAKENHI (17K15588, 21K08417, JP22J40144, and 25K22772), the Naito Foundation, and the Tokyo Biochemical Research Foundation to E.S. S.S was supported by JST Moonshot R&D (JPMJMS2025), Japan Agency for Medical Research and Development (AMED) PRIME (JP19gm6310005), Naito foundation and Takeda Science Foundation, KAKENHI (JP23K27428), the Joint Research of the Exploratory Research Center on Life and Living Systems (ExCELLS) (program No. 20-316) in the National Institutes of Natural Sciences. This work utilized research equipment shared in the MEXT Project for promoting public utilization of advanced research infrastructure (Program for supporting introduction of the new sharing system), grant Number JPMXS0422300222. This work was supported in part by the MEXT Cooperative Research Project Program, Medical Research Center Initiative for High Depth Omics, and the MEXT Promotion of Development of a Joint Usage/Research System Project: Coalition of Universities for Research Excellence Program (CURE) grant number JPMXP1323015486 for MIB, Kyushu University. The infrastructure of the Omics Science Center Secure Information Analysis System, Medical Institute of Bioregulation at Kyushu University, provides a part of the computational resource.

Author information

Author notes
  1. Eriko Sumiya

    Present address: Department of Molecular Therapy, National Institute of Neuroscience, NCNP, Tokyo, Japan

  2. Yuka Morioka

    Present address: Institute for Experimental Animals, Graduate School of Medicine, Kobe University, Kobe, Japan

  3. Yuki Yoshimura

    Present address: Division of Integrative Physiology, Faculty of Medicine, Tottori University, Yonago, Japan

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Division of Mucosal Immunology, Medical Institute of Bioregulation, Kyushu University, Fukuoka, Japan

    Eriko Sumiya, Noriko Kurisaki, Mami Kurumata-Shigeto, Yumiko Kitada & Shinichiro Sawa

  2. Department of Veterinary Medicine, Okayama University of Science, Imabari, Japan

    Kohei Saeki

  3. Department of Laboratory Animal Medicine, National Institute of Global Health and Medicine, Japan Institute for Health Security (JIHS), Tokyo, Japan

    Kenta Nakano & Tadashi Okamura

  4. Division of Bioinformatics, Medical Institute of Bioregulation, Kyushu University, Fukuoka, Japan

    Chie Kikutake & Mikita Suyama

  5. Department of Skeletal Development and Regenerative Biology, Nagasaki University Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Nagasaki, Japan

    Natsuko Nakaima & Yuki Matsushita

  6. Division of Disease Model Innovation, Institute for Genetic Medicine, Hokkaido University, Sapporo, Japan

    Yuka Morioka

  7. Cognitive Genomics Research Group, Exploratory Research Center on Life and Living Systems (ExCELLS), National Institutes of Natural Sciences, Okazaki, Japan

    Yasuhiro Go

  8. Department of System Neuroscience, National Institute for Physiological Science, Okazaki, Japan

    Yasuhiro Go

  9. Graduate School of Information Science, University of Hyogo, Kobe, Japan

    Yasuhiro Go

  10. Central Institute for Experimental Medicine and Life Science (CIEM), Kawasaki, Japan

    Yuki Yoshimura, Motohito Goto & Mamoru Ito

  11. Laboratory of Medical Omics Research, Department of Frontier Research and Development, Kazusa DNA Research Institute, Kisarazu, Japan

    Manabu Nakayama

  12. Department of Orthopedic Surgery, School of Medicine, Gifu University, Gifu, Japan

    Haruhiko Akiyama

  13. Center for One Medicine Innovative Translational Research (COMIT), Gifu University, Gifu, Japan

    Haruhiko Akiyama

  14. Stroma, Inflammation & Tissue Repaire Unit, Institut Pasteur, Paris, 75015, France

    Lucie Peduto

Authors
  1. Eriko Sumiya
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Kohei Saeki
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Kenta Nakano
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Chie Kikutake
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Noriko Kurisaki
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Natsuko Nakaima
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Mami Kurumata-Shigeto
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Yumiko Kitada
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Yuka Morioka
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  10. Yasuhiro Go
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  11. Mikita Suyama
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  12. Yuki Yoshimura
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  13. Motohito Goto
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  14. Mamoru Ito
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  15. Manabu Nakayama
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  16. Haruhiko Akiyama
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  17. Lucie Peduto
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  18. Tadashi Okamura
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  19. Yuki Matsushita
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  20. Shinichiro Sawa
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

E.S. and S.S. designed the project. E.S., S.S., N.N., N.K., M.K.S, Y.K., and Y.M. (Yuka Morioka) performed experiments. E.S., S.S., K.S., and C.K. analyzed the data and prepared figures. K.N., S.S., E.S., M.K.S, Y.K., and T.O. generated novel mouse lines. Y.Y., M.G., M.I., H.A., L.P., and Y.M. (Yuki Matsushita) provided critical mouse lines. M.N. provided experimental material. M.S. and Y.G. provided critical experimental platforms and inputs. E.S. and S.S. wrote the paper. L.P. proofread the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Shinichiro Sawa.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Peer review

Peer review information

Nature Communications thanks Marc Wein and the other anonymous reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work. A peer review file is available.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Information (download PDF )

Peer Review file (download PDF )

Reporting Summary (download PDF )

Source data

Source Data (download XLSX )

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if you modified the licensed material. You do not have permission under this licence to share adapted material derived from this article or parts of it. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Sumiya, E., Saeki, K., Nakano, K. et al. Medullary cavity expansion is mediated by distinct cell populations during fetal bone development. Nat Commun (2026). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-026-71952-5

Download citation

  • Received: 05 March 2025

  • Accepted: 01 April 2026

  • Published: 14 April 2026

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-026-71952-5

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

Download PDF

Advertisement

Explore content

  • Research articles
  • Reviews & Analysis
  • News & Comment
  • Videos
  • Collections
  • Subjects
  • Follow us on Facebook
  • Follow us on X
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed

About the journal

  • Aims & Scope
  • Editors
  • Journal Information
  • Open Access Fees and Funding
  • Calls for Papers
  • Editorial Values Statement
  • Journal Metrics
  • Editors' Highlights
  • Contact
  • Editorial policies
  • Top Articles

Publish with us

  • For authors
  • For Reviewers
  • Language editing services
  • Open access funding
  • Submit manuscript

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

  • Explore articles by subject
  • Find a job
  • Guide to authors
  • Editorial policies

Nature Communications (Nat Commun)

ISSN 2041-1723 (online)

nature.com footer links

About Nature Portfolio

  • About us
  • Press releases
  • Press office
  • Contact us

Discover content

  • Journals A-Z
  • Articles by subject
  • protocols.io
  • Nature Index

Publishing policies

  • Nature portfolio policies
  • Open access

Author & Researcher services

  • Reprints & permissions
  • Research data
  • Language editing
  • Scientific editing
  • Nature Masterclasses
  • Research Solutions

Libraries & institutions

  • Librarian service & tools
  • Librarian portal
  • Open research
  • Recommend to library

Advertising & partnerships

  • Advertising
  • Partnerships & Services
  • Media kits
  • Branded content

Professional development

  • Nature Awards
  • Nature Careers
  • Nature Conferences

Regional websites

  • Nature Africa
  • Nature China
  • Nature India
  • Nature Japan
  • Nature Middle East
  • Privacy Policy
  • Use of cookies
  • Legal notice
  • Accessibility statement
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Your US state privacy rights
Springer Nature

© 2026 Springer Nature Limited

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing