Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Advertisement

Nature Communications
  • View all journals
  • Search
  • My Account Login
  • Content Explore content
  • About the journal
  • Publish with us
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed
  1. nature
  2. nature communications
  3. articles
  4. article
SMG7 and eIF4A constitute a homeostatic module controlling P-body condensation and function of meiotic bodies
Download PDF
Download PDF
  • Article
  • Open access
  • Published: 21 April 2026

SMG7 and eIF4A constitute a homeostatic module controlling P-body condensation and function of meiotic bodies

  • Albert Cairo  ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0002-5859-75971,
  • Neha Shukla1,
  • Sofia Kanavorova1,
  • Jan Skalak1,
  • Pavlina Mikulkova1,
  • Anna Vargova1,
  • David Potesil  ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0003-0390-09041,
  • Zbynek Zdrahal1,
  • Jan Hejatko  ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0002-2622-60461 &
  • …
  • Karel Riha  ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0002-6124-01181 

Nature Communications (2026) Cite this article

  • 4071 Accesses

  • 3 Altmetric

  • Metrics details

We are providing an unedited version of this manuscript to give early access to its findings. Before final publication, the manuscript will undergo further editing. Please note there may be errors present which affect the content, and all legal disclaimers apply.

Subjects

  • Plant cell biology
  • Plant reproduction
  • RNA metabolism

Abstract

Processing bodies (P-bodies) are ribonucleoprotein condensates that regulate RNA processing and storage. Although constitutively present in most cells, their size and composition change dynamically in response to developmental and environmental cues. However, mechanisms governing P-body assembly and remodeling remain poorly understood. Here we show that in Arabidopsis, SMG7 interacts with the eIF4A helicases and recruits them to P-bodies. eIF4As limit P-body condensation and also restrict stress granule (SG) formation under heat stress. We further identify meiotic bodies (M-bodies) as composite RNP granules with a P-body core surrounded by a SG-like shell. The SMG7-eIF4A module regulates the recruitment of the meiosis-specific protein TDM1 into M-bodies, thereby influencing meiotic exit and plant reproduction. Our findings suggest that SMG7 functions as an adaptor protein that recruits client proteins into P-bodies and, together with eIF4A, forms a regulatory module that controls P-body composition and maintains their size homeostasis.

Similar content being viewed by others

The adaptor protein AP-3β disassembles heat-induced stress granules via 19S regulatory particle in Arabidopsis

Article Open access 27 February 2025

Reshaping cancer cell plasticity by P-body dynamics and protein translation

Article Open access 02 January 2026

AtPRMT3-RPS2B promotes ribosome biogenesis and coordinates growth and cold adaptation trade-off

Article Open access 08 October 2024

Data availability

Mass spectrometry proteomics data were deposited to the ProteomeXchange Consortium via PRIDE85 partner repository under dataset identifier PXD061406 and 10.6019/PXD061406. The microscopy data generated in this study have been deposited at the EBI bioimage archive (https://www.ebi.ac.uk/bioimage-archive/) under accession number S-BIAD3172. Source data are provided with this paper.

References

  1. Banani, S. F., Lee, H. O., Hyman, A. A. & Rosen, M. K. Biomolecular condensates: organizers of cellular biochemistry. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 18, 285–298 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Shin, Y. & Brangwynne, C. P. Liquid phase condensation in cell physiology and disease. Science 357, eaaf4382 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Guillen-Boixet, J. et al. RNA-induced conformational switching and clustering of G3BP drive stress granule assembly by condensation. Cell 181, 346–361 e317 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Van Treeck, B. et al. RNA self-assembly contributes to stress granule formation and defining the stress granule transcriptome. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 115, 2734–2739 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Roden, C. & Gladfelter, A. S. RNA contributions to the form and function of biomolecular condensates. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 22, 183–195 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Tauber, D. et al. Modulation of RNA condensation by the DEAD-Box protein eIF4A. Cell 180, 411–426 e416 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Langdon, E. M. et al. mRNA structure determines specificity of a polyQ-driven phase separation. Science 360, 922–927 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Ripin, N., Macedo de Vasconcelos, L., Ugay, D. A. & Parker, R. DDX6 modulates P-body and stress granule assembly, composition, and docking. J. Cell Biol. 223, e202306022 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Ripin, N. & Parker, R. Are stress granules the RNA analogs of misfolded protein aggregates? RNA 28, 67–75 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Ripin, N. & Parker, R. Formation, function, and pathology of RNP granules. Cell 186, 4737–4756 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Trussina, I. et al. G3BP-driven RNP granules promote inhibitory RNA-RNA interactions resolved by DDX3X to regulate mRNA translatability. Mol. Cell 85, 585–601 e511 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  12. Hondele, M. et al. DEAD-box ATPases are global regulators of phase-separated organelles. Nature 573, 144–148 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  13. Merrick, W. C. & Pavitt, G. D. Protein synthesis initiation in eukaryotic cells. Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Biol. 10, a033092 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  14. Lu, W. T., Wilczynska, A., Smith, E. & Bushell, M. The diverse roles of the eIF4A family: you are the company you keep. Biochem. Soc. Trans. 42, 166–172 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  15. Desroches Altamirano, C. et al. eIF4F is a thermo-sensing regulatory node in the translational heat shock response. Mol. Cell 84, 1727–1741 e1712 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  16. Jackson, R. J., Hellen, C. U. & Pestova, T. V. The mechanism of eukaryotic translation initiation and principles of its regulation. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 11, 113–127 (2010).

    Google Scholar 

  17. Luo, Y., Na, Z. & Slavoff, S. A. P-bodies: composition, properties, and functions. Biochemistry 57, 2424–2431 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  18. Chantarachot, T. & Bailey-Serres, J. Polysomes, stress granules, and processing bodies: a dynamic triumvirate controlling cytoplasmic mRNA fate and function. Plant Physiol. 176, 254–269 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  19. Yu, X. et al. Orchestration of processing body dynamics and mRNA decay in immunity. Cell Rep. 28, 2194 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  20. Jang, G. J., Yang, J. Y., Hsieh, H. L. & Wu, S. H. Processing bodies control the selective translation for optimal development of Arabidopsis young seedlings. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 116, 6451–6456 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  21. Liu, C. et al. An actin remodeling role for Arabidopsis processing bodies revealed by their proximity interactome. EMBO J. 42, e111885 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  22. Tong, J. et al. ALBA proteins confer thermotolerance through stabilizing HSF messenger RNAs in cytoplasmic granules. Nat. Plants 8, 778–791 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  23. Cairo, A. et al. Meiotic exit in Arabidopsis is driven by P-body-mediated inhibition of translation. Science 377, 629–634 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  24. Weber, C., Nover, L. & Fauth, M. Plant stress granules and mRNA processing bodies are distinct from heat stress granules. Plant J. 56, 517–530 (2008).

    Google Scholar 

  25. Liu, C. et al. A proxitome-RNA-capture approach reveals that processing bodies repress coregulated hub genes. Plant Cell 36, 559–584 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  26. Maldonado-Bonilla, L. D. Composition and function of P bodies in Arabidopsis thaliana. Front. Plant Sci. 5, 201 (2014).

  27. Hubstenberger, A. et al. P-body purification reveals the condensation of repressed mRNA regulons. Mol. Cell 68, 144–157 e145 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  28. Unterholzner, L. & Izaurralde, E. SMG7 acts as a molecular link between mRNA surveillance and mRNA decay. Mol. Cell 16, 587–596 (2004).

    Google Scholar 

  29. Merai, Z. et al. The late steps of plant nonsense-mediated mRNA decay. Plant J. 73, 50–62 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  30. Fukuhara, N. et al. SMG7 is a 14-3-3-like adaptor in the nonsense-mediated mRNA decay pathway. Mol. Cell 17, 537–547 (2005).

    Google Scholar 

  31. Riehs, N. et al. Arabidopsis SMG7 protein is required for exit from meiosis. J. Cell Sci. 121, 2208–2216 (2008).

    Google Scholar 

  32. Riehs-Kearnan, N., Gloggnitzer, J., Dekrout, B., Jonak, C. & Riha, K. Aberrant growth and lethality of Arabidopsis deficient in nonsense-mediated RNA decay factors is caused by autoimmune-like response. Nucleic Acids Res. 40, 5615–5624 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  33. Obsilova, V. & Obsil, T. Structural insights into the functional roles of 14-3-3 proteins. Front. Mol. Biosci. 9, 1016071 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  34. Gloggnitzer, J. et al. Nonsense-mediated mRNA decay modulates immune receptor levels to regulate plant antibacterial defense. Cell Host Microbe 16, 376–390 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  35. Bush, M. S., Crowe, N., Zheng, T. & Doonan, J. H. The RNA helicase, eIF4A-1, is required for ovule development and cell size homeostasis in Arabidopsis. Plant J. 84, 989–1004 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  36. Koroleva, O. A. et al. Dynamic behavior of Arabidopsis eIF4A-III, putative core protein of exon junction complex: fast relocation to nucleolus and splicing speckles under hypoxia. Plant Cell 21, 1592–1606 (2009).

    Google Scholar 

  37. Capitao, C., Shukla, N., Wandrolova, A., Mittelsten Scheid, O. & Riha, K. Functional characterization of SMG7 paralogs in Arabidopsis thaliana. Front. Plant Sci. 9, 1602 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  38. Heazlewood, J. L. et al. PhosPhAt: a database of phosphorylation sites in Arabidopsis thaliana and a plant-specific phosphorylation site predictor. Nucleic Acids Res. 36, D1015–1021 (2008).

    Google Scholar 

  39. Abramson, J. et al. Accurate structure prediction of biomolecular interactions with AlphaFold 3. Nature 630, 493–500 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  40. Gutierrez-Beltran, E., Moschou, P. N., Smertenko, A. P. & Bozhkov, P. V. Tudor staphylococcal nuclease links formation of stress granules and processing bodies with mRNA catabolism in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 27, 926–943 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  41. Hamada, T. et al. Stress granule formation is induced by a threshold temperature rather than a temperature difference in Arabidopsis. J. Cell Sci. 131, jcs216051 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  42. Mollet, S. et al. Translationally repressed mRNA transiently cycles through stress granules during stress. Mol. Biol. Cell 19, 4469–4479 (2008).

    Google Scholar 

  43. Kedersha, N. et al. Stress granules and processing bodies are dynamically linked sites of mRNP remodeling. J. Cell Biol. 169, 871–884 (2005).

    Google Scholar 

  44. Wilczynska, A., Aigueperse, C., Kress, M., Dautry, F. & Weil, D. The translational regulator CPEB1 provides a link between dcp1 bodies and stress granules. J. Cell Sci. 118, 981–992 (2005).

    Google Scholar 

  45. Kosmacz, M. et al. Protein and metabolite composition of Arabidopsis stress granules. N. Phytol. 222, 1420–1433 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  46. Kedersha, N. L., Gupta, M., Li, W., Miller, I. & Anderson, P. RNA-binding proteins TIA-1 and TIAR link the phosphorylation of eIF-2 alpha to the assembly of mammalian stress granules. J. Cell Biol. 147, 1431–1442 (1999).

    Google Scholar 

  47. Nguyen, C. C. et al. Oligouridylate binding protein 1b plays an integral role in plant heat stress tolerance. Front. Plant Sci. 7, 853 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  48. Chantarachot, T. et al. DHH1/DDX6-like RNA helicases maintain ephemeral half-lives of stress-response mRNAs. Nat. Plants 6, 675–685 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  49. Mugler, C. F. et al. ATPase activity of the DEAD-box protein Dhh1 controls processing body formation. eLife 5, e18746 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  50. Capitao, C. et al. A CENH3 mutation promotes meiotic exit and restores fertility in SMG7-deficient Arabidopsis. PLoS Genet. 17, e1009779 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  51. Tanasa, S. et al. A complex role of Arabidopsis CDKD;3 in meiotic progression and cytokinesis. Plant Direct 7, e477 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  52. Bulankova, P., Riehs-Kearnan, N., Nowack, M. K., Schnittger, A. & Riha, K. Meiotic progression in Arabidopsis is governed by complex regulatory interactions between SMG7, TDM1, and the meiosis I-specific cyclin TAM. Plant Cell 22, 3791–3803 (2010).

    Google Scholar 

  53. Karousis, E. D. & Muhlemann, O. Nonsense-mediated mRNA decay begins where translation ends. Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Biol. 11, a032862 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  54. Raxwal, V. K. & Riha, K. The biological functions of nonsense-mediated mRNA decay in plants: RNA quality control and beyond. Biochem Soc. Trans. 51, 31–39 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  55. Kurosaki, T., Popp, M. W. & Maquat, L. E. Quality and quantity control of gene expression by nonsense-mediated mRNA decay. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 20, 406–420 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  56. Sheth, U. & Parker, R. Targeting of aberrant mRNAs to cytoplasmic processing bodies. Cell 125, 1095–1109 (2006).

    Google Scholar 

  57. Hu, W., Petzold, C., Coller, J. & Baker, K. E. Nonsense-mediated mRNA decapping occurs on polyribosomes in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 17, 244–247 (2010).

    Google Scholar 

  58. Stalder, L. & Muhlemann, O. Processing bodies are not required for mammalian nonsense-mediated mRNA decay. RNA 15, 1265–1273 (2009).

    Google Scholar 

  59. Mergner, J. et al. Mass-spectrometry-based draft of the Arabidopsis proteome. Nature 579, 409–414 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  60. Ferraiuolo, M. A. et al. A role for the eIF4E-binding protein 4E-T in P-body formation and mRNA decay. J. Cell Biol. 170, 913–924 (2005).

    Google Scholar 

  61. Webster, C., Gaut, R. L., Browning, K. S., Ravel, J. M. & Roberts, J. K. Hypoxia enhances phosphorylation of eukaryotic initiation factor 4A in maize root tips. J. Biol. Chem. 266, 23341–23346 (1991).

    Google Scholar 

  62. Gallie, D. R. & Pitto, L. Translational control during recovery from heat shock in the absence of heat shock proteins. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 227, 462–467 (1996).

    Google Scholar 

  63. Safieddine, A. et al. Cell-cycle-dependent mRNA localization in P-bodies. Mol. Cell 84, 4191–4208 e4197 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  64. González-Fuente, M. et al. Bacteria use processing body condensates to attenuate host translation during infection. Preprint at https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/2025.01.09.632196v2 (2025).

  65. Bush, M. S. et al. eIF4A RNA helicase associates with cyclin-dependent protein kinase A in proliferating cells and is modulated by phosphorylation. Plant Physiol. 172, 128–140 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  66. Sofroni, K. et al. CDKD-dependent activation of CDKA;1 controls microtubule dynamics and cytokinesis during meiosis. J. Cell Biol. 219, e201907016 (2020).

  67. Yang, C. et al. The Arabidopsis Cdk1/Cdk2 homolog CDKA;1 controls chromosome axis assembly during plant meiosis. EMBO J. 39, e101625 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  68. De Jaeger-Braet, J. et al. The recruitment of the A-type cyclin TAM to stress granules is crucial for meiotic fidelity under heat. Sci. Adv. 11, eadr5694 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  69. Mimura, M., Ono, S., Somashekar, H. & Nonomura, K. I. Impact of protein domains on the MEL2 granule, a cytoplasmic ribonucleoprotein complex maintaining faithful meiosis progression in rice. N. Phytol. 243, 2235–2250 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  70. Berchowitz, L. E. et al. Regulated formation of an amyloid-like translational repressor governs gametogenesis. Cell 163, 406–418 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  71. Cheng, S. et al. Mammalian oocytes store mRNAs in a mitochondria-associated membraneless compartment. Science 378, eabq4835 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  72. Nelms, B. & Walbot, V. Defining the developmental program leading to meiosis in maize. Science 364, 52–56 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  73. Nelms, B. & Walbot, V. Gametophyte genome activation occurs at pollen mitosis I in maize. Science 375, 424–429 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  74. Saddala, S. et al. Post-transcriptional regulation of meiotic transcripts by the RNA binding protein CDM1 is associated with cytoplasmic condensate assemblies. Preprint at https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/2025.08.17.670746v1 (2025).

  75. Nakagawa, T. et al. Improved Gateway binary vectors: high-performance vectors for creation of fusion constructs in transgenic analysis of plants. Biosci. Biotechnol. Biochem 71, 2095–2100 (2007).

    Google Scholar 

  76. Yoo, S. D., Cho, Y. H. & Sheen, J. Arabidopsis mesophyll protoplasts: a versatile cell system for transient gene expression analysis. Nat. Protoc. 2, 1565–1572 (2007).

    Google Scholar 

  77. Schindelin, J. et al. Fiji: an open-source platform for biological-image analysis. Nat. Methods 9, 676–682 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  78. Voinnet, O., Lederer, C. & Baulcombe, D. C. A viral movement protein prevents spread of the gene silencing signal in Nicotiana benthamiana. Cell 103, 157–167 (2000).

    Google Scholar 

  79. Bajar, B. T., Wang, E. S., Zhang, S., Lin, M. Z. & Chu, J. A guide to fluorescent protein FRET pairs. Sensors 16, 1488 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  80. Alexander, M. P. Differential staining of aborted and nonaborted pollen. Stain Technol. 44, 117–122 (1969).

    Google Scholar 

  81. Valuchova, S. et al. Imaging plant germline differentiation within Arabidopsis flowers by light sheet microscopy. eLife 9, e52546 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  82. Cox, J. & Mann, M. MaxQuant enables high peptide identification rates, individualized p.p.b.-range mass accuracies and proteome-wide protein quantification. Nat. Biotechnol. 26, 1367–1372 (2008).

    Google Scholar 

  83. Cox, J. et al. Andromeda: a peptide search engine integrated into the MaxQuant environment. J. Proteome Res. 10, 1794–1805 (2011).

    Google Scholar 

  84. Goddard, T. D. et al. UCSF ChimeraX: meeting modern challenges in visualization and analysis. Protein Sci. 27, 14–25 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  85. Perez-Riverol, Y. et al. The PRIDE database at 20 years: 2025 update. Nucleic Acids Res. 53, D543–D553 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  86. Dosztanyi, Z. Prediction of protein disorder based on IUPred. Protein Sci. 27, 331–340 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the Czech Science Foundation (EXPRO grant 23-07969X). We thank Richard Stefl for his support and advice with the AF interaction prediction and its structural analysis. We further acknowledge the core facilities of CEITEC Masaryk University for support in obtaining and analyzing scientific data. CELLIM is funded by MEYS CR (LM2023050 Czech-BioImaging), Proteomics Core Facility of CIISB, Instruct-CZ Centre, supported by MEYS CR (LM2023042, CZ.02.01.01/00/23_ 015/0008175, e-INFRA CZ (ID:90254), and Plant Science Core Facility.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Central European Institute of Technology, Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic

    Albert Cairo, Neha Shukla, Sofia Kanavorova, Jan Skalak, Pavlina Mikulkova, Anna Vargova, David Potesil, Zbynek Zdrahal, Jan Hejatko & Karel Riha

Authors
  1. Albert Cairo
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Neha Shukla
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Sofia Kanavorova
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Jan Skalak
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Pavlina Mikulkova
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Anna Vargova
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  7. David Potesil
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Zbynek Zdrahal
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Jan Hejatko
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  10. Karel Riha
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

Conceptualization: A.C. and K.R.; methodology: A.C.; formal analysis: A.C., J.S., and D.P.; investigation, A.C., N.S., S.K., J.S., P.M., A.V., and D.P.; writing—original draft: A.C. and K.R.; writing—review and editing: A.C., N.S., S.K., J.S., P.M., A.V., D.P., Z.Z., J.H., and K.R.; visualization: A.C., J.S., P.M., and K.R.; resources: Z.Z., J.H., and K.R.; supervision, A.C. and K.R.; funding acquisition: K.R.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Albert Cairo or Karel Riha.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Peer review

Peer review information

Nature Communications thanks Xiaoqi Feng and the other anonymous, reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work. A peer review file is available.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Information (download PDF )

Description of Additional Supplementary File (download PDF )

Supplementary Movie 1 (download MP4 )

Reporting Summary (download PDF )

Transparent Peer Review file (download PDF )

Source data

Source data (download XLSX )

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Cairo, A., Shukla, N., Kanavorova, S. et al. SMG7 and eIF4A constitute a homeostatic module controlling P-body condensation and function of meiotic bodies. Nat Commun (2026). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-026-72218-w

Download citation

  • Received: 10 July 2025

  • Accepted: 08 April 2026

  • Published: 21 April 2026

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-026-72218-w

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

Download PDF

Advertisement

Explore content

  • Research articles
  • Reviews & Analysis
  • News & Comment
  • Videos
  • Collections
  • Subjects
  • Follow us on Facebook
  • Follow us on X
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed

About the journal

  • Aims & Scope
  • Editors
  • Journal Information
  • Open Access Fees and Funding
  • Calls for Papers
  • Editorial Values Statement
  • Journal Metrics
  • Editors' Highlights
  • Contact
  • Editorial policies
  • Top Articles

Publish with us

  • For authors
  • For Reviewers
  • Language editing services
  • Open access funding
  • Submit manuscript

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

  • Explore articles by subject
  • Find a job
  • Guide to authors
  • Editorial policies

Nature Communications (Nat Commun)

ISSN 2041-1723 (online)

nature.com footer links

About Nature Portfolio

  • About us
  • Press releases
  • Press office
  • Contact us

Discover content

  • Journals A-Z
  • Articles by subject
  • protocols.io
  • Nature Index

Publishing policies

  • Nature portfolio policies
  • Open access

Author & Researcher services

  • Reprints & permissions
  • Research data
  • Language editing
  • Scientific editing
  • Nature Masterclasses
  • Research Solutions

Libraries & institutions

  • Librarian service & tools
  • Librarian portal
  • Open research
  • Recommend to library

Advertising & partnerships

  • Advertising
  • Partnerships & Services
  • Media kits
  • Branded content

Professional development

  • Nature Awards
  • Nature Careers
  • Nature Conferences

Regional websites

  • Nature Africa
  • Nature China
  • Nature India
  • Nature Japan
  • Nature Middle East
  • Privacy Policy
  • Use of cookies
  • Legal notice
  • Accessibility statement
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Your US state privacy rights
Springer Nature

© 2026 Springer Nature Limited

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing