Correction to: Nature Ecology & Evolution https://doi.org/10.1038/s41559-018-0743-8, published online 17 December 2018.
In the version of this Article originally published, the description of equation 1 in the Methods subsection ‘Biodiversity conservation benefits’ was incorrect.
The following sentence:
‘On the basis of a previous study10, the change in extinction risk (r) for each individual species as a function of habitat area was modelled as follows:
where A0 is the current habitat area, x is additional habitat area that would arise from habitat restoration, and the power z describes the rate of diminishing returns in value of additional area at reducing extinction risk.’
should have read as follows:
‘On the basis of a previous study10, the extinction risk (r) for each individual species as a function of habitat area was modelled as follows:
where A0 is the original habitat area, x is the current habitat area (that could be increased through habitat restoration), and the power z describes the rate of diminishing returns in value of additional area at reducing extinction risk.’
This error has now been corrected.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Strassburg, B.B.N., Beyer, H.L., Crouzeilles, R. et al. Author Correction: Strategic approaches to restoring ecosystems can triple conservation gains and halve costs. Nat Ecol Evol 4, 765 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41559-020-1211-9
Published:
Version of record:
Issue date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41559-020-1211-9